Insider here

[Anonymous No.52847139]

All this will leak before eoy anyway:
50mm staking allocation increase will all go to nodes
Ccip will launch with 3 blue chip projects porting bridges to ccip
Build will continue releasing 2 new projects per month through 2024
Build assets given proportional to Link token staked with the caveat that 1/3 is always considered for cll
Build tokens will be locked for one year from date of announcement with a linear unlocking schedule for another two years thereafter
Extremely valuable/high profile projects will join build for lower % eg 1-2
Part of this deal is that those projects can't sell tokens on open market any other way
Anytrust/Nova AAS will be offered and staked through SDL in 2023
Yes, reddit will literally be pumping your bags with goodgoy points
Chainlink already can talk to corda for POR and will talk through limited applications of ccip
First real world use case will be bank->bank payment triggering blockchain event or transfer
No true bank->dlt liquidity transfer outside of existing institutions at first
Banner institutional use is tokenized pre-ipo liquid equity with CCIP, POR and CanDID

Anything else you want to know

[Anonymous No.52847621]

>>52847139
When does a 5k stacklet make it?

[Anonymous No.52847652]

>>52847139
Who is behind the ridiculous fud and why do they want to suppress links price

[Anonymous No.52847665]

>>52847139
my guess for the projects
arbitrum
optimism
polygon

[Anonymous No.52847763]

>>52847139
>50mm staking allocation increase will all go to nodes

> tfw only staked ~40% of stack
> Was too lazy to bring crypto computer to work to stake for general access

Bros... hold me.

[Anonymous No.52847806]

>>52847139
>Banner institutional use is tokenized pre-ipo liquid equity with CCIP, POR and CanDID

Can you elaborate on this? I dunno what tokenized pre-ipo liquid equity means. They're selling shares Pre-IPO in a streamlined manner?

[Anonymous No.52847928]

>>52847139
>Anything else you want to know
Price sir. Wen price is bigly mooning?

[Anonymous No.52847933]

Inb4 the fud retard writes an essay that isn’t relevant to anything discussed

[Anonymous No.52847945]

>>52847139
>Ccip will launch with 3 blue chip projects porting bridges to ccip

one is obviously Synthetix and their teleporters
what are the other two? not many blue chip projects out there, what would AAVE use it for? I can see CCIP potentially being used to help liquidity issues for these protocols that are split between eth chain/arbitrum/polygon etc etc maybe?

[Anonymous No.52848020]

a lead dev creating a new DEX that will use CCIP said this:

>Once we go cross-chain via CCIP, fees will drop further, since transactions will get committed to a back-bone chain, and only settlement will occur on the target chain.

do you know what he means about a back-bone chain? is this something CCIP/chainlink will do? or is it more related to the dex

[Anonymous No.52848138]

>>52847945
It's Radiant Finance.

You heard it here first.

[Anonymous No.52848191]

>>52847621
If staked about a year
>>52847806
Listen to prosperi dtccs talk at smartcon

[Anonymous No.52848200]

>>52847139
>Insider here
Why did they get rid of the McRib?

[Anonymous No.52848221]

>>52847945
Aave
Arbitrum across all arbitrum types
Between anytrust networks

[Anonymous No.52848242]

>>52848200
Serg making bigmac as dominant at cl

[Anonymous No.52848261]

>>52848200
For me, it's the McChicken. The best fast food sandwich. I even ask for extra McChicken sauce packets and the staff is so friendly and more than willing to oblige.
One time I asked for McChicken sauce packets and they gave me three. I said, "Wow, three for free!" and the nice friendly McDonald's worker laughed and said, "I'm going to call you 3-for-free!".
Now the staff greets me with "hey it's 3-for-free!" and ALWAYS give me three packets. It's such a fun and cool atmosphere at my local McDonald's restaurant, I go there at least 3 times a week for lunch and a large iced coffee with milk instead of cream, 1-2 times for breakfast on the weekend, and maybe once for dinner when I'm in a rush but want a great meal that is affordable, fast, and can match my daily nutritional needs.
I even dip my fries in McChicken sauce, it's delicious! What a great restaurant.

[Anonymous No.52848365]

Will the new staking allocation for nodes fill immediately? Or is the demand not necessarily there and it will be more gradual?
What do you think the approximate amount/worth of build tokens one will receive will be, assuming 7k staked?

[Anonymous No.52848471]

>>52848365
Nodes can fill their own staking allocation
Or lease link from community through SDL
Build assets= .67(amount staked link/total staked link)
Build assets philosophically are paid to cll in exchange for expertise implementing chainlink infrastructure
Cll expertise is paid for by token sales and in turn token holders
Therefore build assets are rightfully theirs

[Anonymous No.52848494]

>>52847139
"insider here"
every time with your larping soulless homosexuals. did your mom not hug you enough as a kid? did your dad hug you TOO much as a kid? why do you soulless homosexuals larp like this? its never legit its always fake and you look like a tiny pp male that will never pleasure a female in life.

[Anonymous No.52848514]

>>52847139
Whoa that's a lot of buzzwords that I don't understand, so I'm gonna believe you

[Anonymous No.52848537]

>>52847139
Chainlink-enabled CBDC when?

[Anonymous No.52848583]

>>52848514
If you don’t understand basic blockchain terminology, I’d suggest reading more or you’re gonna lose everything.

[Anonymous No.52848620]

>>52848494
>(you)

[Anonymous No.52848639]

>>52848583
I'm cold-stored, air-gapped, enough said

[Anonymous No.52848735]

>>52847945
Lol blue chip projects would mean legacy enterprise not crypto shit

[Anonymous No.52848787]

>>52847139
Why hasn't chainlink been integrated as validators to decentralize Arbitrum yet? Is this still even happening?

[Anonymous No.52848837]

>>52848191
>Listen to prosperi dtccs talk at smartcon

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWxfeQA3lI4

This? I'll listen to this then.

[Anonymous No.52848877]

>>52847139
Why does corda need to be fed data from link?

I worked on a lot of Corda projects when I was in IB

[Anonymous No.52848921]

>>52847763
Just sell a pump and you'll make the interest in a day, calm down.

[Anonymous No.52848942]

>>52847139
Goes without saying but this is not an insider. (I would know)

[Anonymous No.52848952]

>>52847139
Thoughts on chainlink’s 4 of 9 multisig? Will they get rid of it?

[Anonymous No.52849048]

>>52848952
Hi Chris, shouldn’t you be door dashing or writing your blog?

[Anonymous No.52849112]

ccip is still in audit so how relase eoy?

[Anonymous No.52849150]

>>52847139
Give some price projos I need to fap

[Anonymous No.52849220]

>>52848735
>Lol blue chip projects would mean legacy enterprise not crypto shit

Lol! thanks for the comment retard! off you go

[Anonymous No.52849259]

Does CCIP make QNT pretty much redundant ? Genuine question

[Anonymous No.52849266]

>>52847945
ENS probably

[Anonymous No.52849290]

>>52849220
You know I'm right

[Anonymous No.52849299]

>>52848837

starting his section now at about 7:30

> last year we [the DTCC] processed 2.4 QUADRILLION dollars worth of securities
> ..It represents all broker 2 broker trades of equities, corporate debt, treasuries, in the US market


NANI THE FUCK

No wonder Chainlink just created the "Transaction value enabled" concept. Imagine charging 0.01% for all that value.

2.4* 1,000,000,000,000,000 *0.0001
2.4*10^15 *10^-3 => 24 Billion

Chainlink's marketcap is current 3.53B. This alone would almost x6 the price without factoring what new transaction value Chainlink will enable with novel use cases.

13:05 Sergey is asking them about tokenization of assets. Jonathan reaffirmed tokenization isn't going away and SWIFT accepted and will be supporting it but with the focus on tokenizing bonds and equities.
14:48 Stephen is giving his views on tokenization. DTCC did a test case via Project Whitney to see how valuable tokenizing equities was for their platform; it was quite successful and informative. They're working on DSM, Digital Securities Management and they're focused on tokenizing assets where the infrastructure is heavily underdeveloped; real estate, art, and pre-IPO equities.

I still don't know what a Pre-IPO equity is. But it seems Chainlink already found a niche to target and create a monopoly on in the traditional financial world to get in everyone's stack. Damn son.I was late to the conference so I came at the end of this talk. I'm glad I'm listening to it now.

[Anonymous No.52849397]

>>52849299

https://rhsfinancial.com/2021/08/11/pre-ipo-stock-options-and-rsus-a-comprehensive-guide/

Okay, glancing over this page, it seems Pre-IPO equities are valueless before the IPO event. Tokenizing these PIEs seems like a natural idea to generate value. Basically traditional companies are going to catch up with crypto projects that create and distribute tokens almost immediately. Damn, crypto is way ahead of the game. But yes, big for crypto.

[Anonymous No.52849398]

>>52847945
Aave, snx, ens

[Anonymous No.52849603]

>>52849397
Pre-IPO equities aren’t valueless; what price would you pay for 1% of SpaceX, for example? Funding rounds will often include buying out of previous holders. Tokenization brings of said private assets brings a mechanism that could be used to price but more likely used for mechanistic efficiency. Idk curious to see how it develops.

[Anonymous No.52849634]

>>52848877
First its the other way
Corda data is the input for blockchain outputs
Safer to start that way
>>52849112
Ccip launch patners already have access on testnets
Audit hell will take however long it takes
>>52849259
Quant is such a scam that they had to have their own employee fake an interview at their paid booth at sibos
Ccip is chainlink developing an interface that swift member banks are confident in security wise
Quant is using tricks like above to scam retail
>>52849299
Thanks for actually taking the time to listen
Heres an even spicier meatball
https://www.dtcc.com/dtcc-connection/articles/2022/march/01/modernizing-the-private-markets-with-dtccs-digital-securities-management-platform
And yes, thats dtcc using ccip

[Anonymous No.52849638]

>>52847139
why does chainlink insist on killing its own investors confidence or is the team really this retarded on optics
specifically why did the team hype up the build rewards and the initial staking only to post a blog right on the day of maximum market fuckery on the recent lows where they say 2 year lock up of tokens and rewards and use wording that pretty much implies the rugging of the build token

on short does sergey hate our guts with a passion or is he bigmac swallowing incompetent at this game

[Anonymous No.52849659]

>>52849603
There is societal friction on both sides
Average investors resent that accreditation is required for early stage hq projects
Hnwis would like liquidity in early stage equity
Its a big win win

[Anonymous No.52849703]

>>52849638
its the former because we forced him to learn the Truth (of racism) which is why he got fat; reason being cognitive dissonance that the Truth he claims to be seeking contradicts his own brainwashing aka liberal democratic values

[Anonymous No.52849762]

>>52849659
So its to bring liquidity to illiquid spaces, neat

[Anonymous No.52849834]

>>52849659
is Chainlink playing a role in the NYIC's new POCs? Swift will be providing interoperability support which CCIP seems like a likely candidate, but is that the extent of the usage?

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20221115005936/en/Members-of-the-U.S.-Banking-Community-Launch-Proof-of-Concept-For-A-Regulated-Digital-Asset-Settlement-Platform

How about project Cedar?

https://www.newyorkfed.org/aboutthefed/nyic/project-cedar

Also:

Project Nexus/Genesis from BiS?

Also:

Pee pee poo poo????

[Anonymous No.52849837]

is link bigger than what we expect from the crumbs over the years or not? The pre-ipo topic suggests the former because crumbs suggested link will be integral in larger markets. Do you suggest holding and if so how long and when to sell?

[Anonymous No.52850015]

>>52849634
>>Heres an even spicier meatball
>https://www.dtcc.com/dtcc-connection/articles/2022/march/01/modernizing-the-private-markets-with-dtccs-digital-securities-management-platform
>And yes, thats dtcc using ccip

Man, while this is no doubt a huge opportunity, I can't help but laugh that these guys feel so far behind the frictionless and seamless nature of Web3. Feels like they're trying to build Uniswap for the traditional financial world, except in the traditional financial world, every company is basically its own blockchain so they'd need a CCIP enabled Uniswap to create a platform that can seamlessly connect these participants.

Damn, I've only been looking at CCIP within the context of Web3. Sounds like the traditional financial industry wants this interface to connect with each other just as much, if not more than Web3. Actually, a lot more than Web3; you don't hear about many people raving about the potential for dapps to work irrespective of their blockchain. I'd imagine this would put a damper on how much someone would value their blockchain of choice.

>>52849603
>Pre-IPO equities aren’t valueless; what price would you pay for 1% of SpaceX, for example?

The impression I got is that there's a ton of regulatory barriers that if you wanted to get in or out of some Pre-IPO equity, your hands are tied so DTCC's DSM platform reduces barriers to make them more liquid.

[Anonymous No.52850050]

>>52849837
This is CCIP within the Web3 space. CCIP within the context of the traditional financial world is 100000x bigger I'd bet.

[Anonymous No.52850079]

>>52849299
A quick bit of maths on this.

2400000000000000 / 1000000000 / 365
(2.4 Quadtrillion) / (1B total supply) / 365 days
=$65753.4246575 a day.

Going further;
$65753.4246575 / 24 / 60 / 60
ANS / 24 hour / 60 mins / 60 seconds
=$0.76103500761 every second.

This means, DTCC needs to have 76 cents of collateral every second, assume settlement occurs instantly (1 second)

[Anonymous No.52850237]

>>52849837
most crumbs are forgotten, anon - but that doesn't mean they haven't been under development and will come to fruition. Whitney and Bletchley, for example. People are also sleeping on the impact baseline will have in integrating enterprise.

There is a reason fudders never mention this stuff. Thy don't even need to, baggies and speculators are in dog-chase-tail phase of market cycle.

If you have even a slight suspicion that you will make a significant amount of money relative to your current lot in life, make damn sure you reign in your mental, emotional and spiritual issues or the money will destroy you. You need to be getting healthy, cutting porn, garbage media, reading good books, finding good friends, and nurturing your soul so that you are raped by your gains in one way or another - a tale as old as time.

[Anonymous No.52850259]

>>52850237
>are raped
AREN'T raped

[Anonymous No.52850362]

>>52847139
are you the insider that said major partners will be revealed with staking?

[Anonymous No.52850372]

>>52847139
Just wanted to say fucking THANK YOU. I've been coming to here for 5+ years and this place has turned into a Link fud bot shithole, but threads like these that pop up every week or two make it worth it. Please keep coming back.

t. 50k Link OG - 14k Staked Forever

[Anonymous No.52850729]

is SDL legit? will it be actually used and gain popularity like UNI?

[Anonymous No.52850801]

>>52850372
Why did this thread die. I post and it dies... Damn.

[Anonymous No.52850964]

>>52850729
desu it looks like lpl holders got raped, but Sergey will probably try to help Johnny save face... somehow.

Why would you ever buy a token whose use was, is to stake... a different token?

[Anonymous No.52851083]

>>52847139
>Chainlink Labs employee leaks fake things to improve sentiment after the Linkpool debacle
>Mentions CCIP

[Anonymous No.52851220]

>>52847139
Can you just let us know when they expect price to go up and what are we looking at 1 year from now in price given your info?

[Anonymous No.52851336]

Wonderful news op.
I wonder if any of these developments will impact the price in anyway.

[Anonymous No.52851411]

>>52847139
>Insider here
stopped reading there

[Anonymous No.52851734]

Will the 7k limit on staking be raised eventually?

[Anonymous No.52851770]

>>52850079
Gonna need a reference here if we're going to go by collateral needed per second or per day.

[Anonymous No.52851848]

he wont be answering this. >>52850362
all you need to know
>>52850801
its dead

[Anonymous No.52852196]

>>52847139
Top thread, thanks OP.
>Build assets= .67(amount staked link/total staked link)
What does this mean? A wallet of 7000 Link will receive 0.67x7000= 4690 tokens of the project?
Surely the supply would need to be factored in? Can you elaborate?
Thanks again

[Anonymous No.52852299]

>>52852196
unfortunately he only told us what we already knew. he just means that 2/3 of build tokens will be distributed evenly based on how much link a wallet has staked, with the other 1/3 going to chainlink. i was hoping he would have an answer for what people actually want to know, like approximately how much he expects the airdrops to be worth etc.

[Anonymous No.52852387]

>>52852299
Lul wut?
> answer for what people actually want to know, like approximately how much he expects the airdrops to be worth etc.

[Anonymous No.52852424]

>>52852387
yeah weird how i thought an insider might give some inside information in an insider thread, and not just what was already readily available

[Anonymous No.52852633]

>>52852424
I don't think anyone could accurately speculate on what you're asking anon desu desu

[Anonymous No.52852677]

>>52852633
idk man, you don't ask you don't fucking get, i just want some fucking hopium christ

[Anonymous No.52852723]

>>52852677
Don't ask any questions unless the have been through a rigorous vetting procedure and possibly some sort of audit, anon! Such impertinence!

[Anonymous No.52852770]

Any nodes you recommend us following or investing time in? Tokens from nodes?

[Anonymous No.52852773]

Only 630 staked, when will I make it.

T 1.2k stacklet

[Anonymous No.52852787]

>>52850050
>Charles Hoskinson
this is what a REAL chain looks like.
Take fucking note!

[Anonymous No.52852850]

what has Linkpool done to you people? Are tey fucked?

[Sage No.52852872]

>>52852723
Spastic

[Anonymous No.52852912]

>this thread
>so much text
>didn't read
GIB RESULTZ SERGEY OR FUCK OFF

[Anonymous No.52853272]

>>52847139
>all this will leak before eoy anyway
This is where your LARP went wrong, OP. Year is almost over, no chance they decide to just give a flurry of amazing updates during holidays when everyone is checked the fuck out.

[Anonymous No.52853384]

>>52853272
He did say leak and not announce, though I still believe this is all larp.

[Anonymous No.52853477]

a larp but a better larp than usual

[Anonymous No.52853494]

>>52853272
No, it makes sense. We'll get a blog post outlining these things stating they'll release next year. Then we'll wait all year not knowing why there were delays, as is tradition.

[Anonymous No.52853533]

>>52853272
>>52853494
none of these insider here threads have been right for a very long time

[Anonymous No.52853654]

>>52847945
Sir this is a larp

[Anonymous No.52854060]

>>52852912
We know you're proud of this meme you made but you don't have to spam it in every thread

[Anonymous No.52854073]

>>52850964
at least they got the whole governance meme now, hopefully that will take off in the future

[Anonymous No.52854390]

>>52847139
What's going on with LPL/SDL

[Anonymous No.52854547]

>>52847139
I staked 14k out of my 20k stack. Will I eventually be able to stake the remaining 6k?

[Anonymous No.52854624]

>>52854060
wrong.

[Anonymous No.52854664]

two more weeks
then we can confirm this is larp thread #5356
we have had JACK SHIT this entire fucking year

[Anonymous No.52854688]

>>52854624
It has been posted with the same filename in every thread

[Anonymous No.52854738]

>>52847139
So why is Jonnie Huxtable removed from the official team page? I know this is a larp to keep people from getting off the ship and sergey never delivers and only wastes his smelly tuna breathe that almost made Jonathan puke.

[Anonymous No.52854960]

>>52854664
we had that fun drum session

[Anonymous No.52855136]

how about I'm not a weak handed faggot
hear me?
hahahahahahahahah

[Anonymous No.52855169]

>>52854688
>you don't have to spam it in every thread
that's what you're wrong about

[Anonymous No.52855353]

the main way to know that it's a larp is that none of the info is anything original, it's all just recycled info and speculation
the giveaway is the corda/por part

[Anonymous No.52855744]

>>52849299
...if SDL (linkpool) capture 5% of Chainlink's .01% of the DTCC pie then SDL market cap of 1.2 bil = $182.00 SDL token price at that point.

Pissed about the "special annoucement" fuckery but when i think about it in this context
kinda feel better.

[Anonymous No.52855904]

>>52855744
If you didn't get into Chainlink's community staking pool, HODL those SDL tokens. The founding nodes are basically gatekeeping access to their pool. It's going to be a doggy dog world when Staking 1.0 comes into play and they're going to try and maximize this next 9-12 months to get the most out of their reputation so that later nodes won't be able to catch up. Whether their game plan will work to keep them on top, I don't know.

I also just realized that assuming insider kun is correct with the other 50M pool going to node operators, I can imagine it'll stay capped at 25M for the community pool but when tokens are unlocked, I can imagine people taking out their Link to sell, which means space for other people to jump in.

So be ready to jump in with a new address if your address is already at the 7K cap. If you can get in Chainlink's community pool, there's no reason to go through a node's staking pool.

[Anonymous No.52855979]

>>52849299
>>52849634
You are sharing valuable information with people that are not worthy of it.

[Anonymous No.52856475]

>>52847139
>3 blue chip projects porting bridges to ccip
Nothingburger as far as demand for the token goes
>2 new projects per month
bull fucking shit

>Anything else you want to know
Will any of this actually pump my now frozen and illiquid bags or are you just fucking us in the ass as usual while get dumped on?

[Anonymous No.52856514]

>>52854960
true

[Anonymous No.52856693]

>>52855744
Nigger, theres 260 million SDL. You need to lay off the fucking copium, 4.6$ per scam.link token in your scenario.
Seriously, is every remaining LINK holder retarded?

[Anonymous No.52856790]

>>52850079
Yeah ya quik mafs on dis is chiks out... What the fuck metric is collateral divided by time supposed to be?

[Anonymous No.52857097]

I am so glad I got my entire stack staked in the chainlink pool. I divided it up into 8 wallets and got them all ready with enough eth for gas , thinking i might be lucky and get 2 or 3 of them staked before the pool filled. Imagine my joy when it didn't fill as fast as i'd feared and I got the entire lot staked. I swear to god that was one of the most satisfying ends to this journey, and i can't imagine what it must be like for those who could have staked but chose not too. That is one move I think they will regret. 2023 is going to be an interesting year for us all.

[Anonymous No.52857230]

>>52857097
Very emotional response to an investment. Sure you're not married?

[Anonymous No.52857524]

>>52857097
>tfw only 28k link staked out of 60k

i hope the staking allocation goes up, at least give some for my 4 wallets already staked. i fucked up

[Anonymous No.52857614]

>>52855979
The only ones who aren't worthy are the ones who don't listen.

>>52857097
I staked 17/40. Had I not been at work, I would have staked another 14K during General Access. Congrats man. I wish I had the testicular fortitude to go all in on staking. I convinced myself to only do 15K and didn't consider if Early Access didn't fill to the brim. Oh well, I'll be waiting to snipe out the spots when weak hands inevitably get shaken out when the staking pool unlocks and Chainlink hits $300 or whatever.

So to those who see $500 or $1000 as their sell point and plan on selling their their staked tokens, just remember;

> you're not getting your spot back.

[Anonymous No.52857718]

>>52857614
Mfw I only staked 7k out of 30 like a best goy

[Anonymous No.52859905]

>>52857718
I admit, this was also running through my head,

> I probably shouldn't be too greedy and leave some space for our other linkbros.

Which lead to my nonchalance for the beginning of General Access. Meanwhile BigFuckOldWhiteWhale had no trouble filling in a full 1M Link by himself.

[Anonymous No.52860690]

OKAY but can someone explain to a simple retardo when a 2k LINK stacklet makes it?

[Anonymous No.52860854]

>>52860690
probably in another two bullruns so 2030

[Anonymous No.52860923]

>>52857614
You are assuming the community pool endures beyond v1.0, this was a bone they threw at us
Doubt it's long term viability

[Anonymous No.52861936]

>>52860923
>doubt its long term viability
Why

[Anonymous No.52862539]

Not sure who's more delusional link baggies or game retards

[Anonymous No.52862624]

>>52847139

[Anonymous No.52862710]

>>52860923
The BUILD program isn't going to be just for a year and community stakers still have a role to play for initiating alerts when nodes mess up. The 4.75% APY won't endure beyond v1.0, but I'm sure the community pool will. What happens when v1.0 comes out and the revenue has to come from somewhere else, only Chainlink can answer that.

[Anonymous No.52862749]

>>52855979
>Anon says what he saw in the HIGHLY WATCHED (among /biz/ linkers) Smartcon talk
>"You are sharing valuable information with people that are not worthy of it."
The talk is not some exclusive content. Go back to twitter pussy.

[Anonymous No.52863174]

Comfy af with 56K Link staked.
Sitting back and just enjoying the ride now. Riches a'plenty en route. Feels good man. Kinda sorry for anyone who didn't Maxstake, but not that sorry.

[Anonymous No.52863205]

>>52863174
you risked a lot, you deserve the rewards

[Anonymous No.52864250]

>>52857718
21/90 here
Dont feel bad fren
Where were going everyones wealthy and free

[Anonymous No.52864317]

Am i the only one who smell curry and see the indian flag when these threads appear?

[Anonymous No.52864343]

>>52864250
OP any more sdl/lpl hopium? thanks fren

[Anonymous No.52864467]

>>52847139
So I missed the staking deadline because of some personal bullshit. Will I ever be able to stake my 1000 Link stack or more again or was this the only opportunity?

[Anonymous No.52864540]

>>52847139
great thread OP. what/when do you think the bottom for LINK will be? looking to buy some more

[Anonymous No.52864541]

>>52864343
yeah, at current rates and a LINK price of $81000 per token you would earn about half a dollar per year if you staked 12500 SDL. that's the best copium you get.

[Anonymous No.52864734]

>>52849634
XRP and QNT are better then chainlink sorry grandpa

[Sanjay pluschain master No.52864812]

>>52847139

no clue what any of that shit means but ok faggot

[Anonymous No.52865078]

>>52864541
there is no hopiuim for SDL. we got robbed

[Anonymous No.52866903]

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/chainlink-automation-is-now-live-on-arbitrum-one-301703078.html

[Anonymous No.52867411]

>>52866903
idk why you guys are hyped on arb. Their is a jew on the team and if past events have taught us anything expect a scam or rug to happen

[Anonymous No.52867497]

>>52847139
Outsider here

This is bullshit.
With the LPL rug pull I have no reason to believe in the "promises" of someone with a track record of hiding delays and his roadmap anymore.
The LINK token has no association ith the Chainlink Labs company the same way as the thief still working for Chainlink decided to rug pull LPL holders.

The original schedule for staking v1.0 gave a 2 years waiting time which they reduced to 1 year for the v0.2 meaning they were optimistic even for that.
You will not get staking v1.0 before 2025 and it won't pump the token price because it will only be used to pretend node operators who are totally corrupt like Linkpool have a stake in the network.

[Anonymous No.52869584]

wait is op not a faggot?

[Anonymous No.52869649]

>>52869584
thanks for posting that

[Anonymous No.52870231]

>>52869584
Why do we get an announcement this important as a discord post?
Why did we not get this message earlier?

Everyone would have understood that it was delayed because of security concerns, but hiding it for half a year left a bad taste.

[Anonymous No.52871590]

nice

[Anonymous No.52871629]

>>52870231
because it's a scam and announcing something officially can get you held accountable.

[Anonymous No.52871703]

How is this thread still alive? This shithole really is dead

[Anonymous No.52872000]

>>52848020
>do you know what he means about a back-bone chain?
Eth will be relegated to a settlement layer, but Eth is expensive and doesn't scale. Arbitrum does. Arbitrum will the backbone chain he is speaking off. Look at the movement, wallets created, and other metrics. Insiders understand this.

[Anonymous No.52872068]

>>52872000
What does this mean for link token price?

[Anonymous No.52872129]

>>52864317
>literal pajeet
lmao stfu paki

[Anonymous No.52872150]

>>52872068
Number will go up. Link is going to do spectacularly over the next few years, only retards disagree.

[Anonymous No.52872193]

>>52872000
>Arbitrum
Didn't Arbitrum backstab Chainlink for the sake of VC funding?

[Anonymous No.52872214]

>>52872193
In a way. They'll still be the settlement layer. Anyone can use Link, it's services, and take advantage of its network effects, including judas cunts. Arbitrum will be massive in the next bullrun and it will build this success off of the back of Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.52872301]

>>52851734
No

[Anonymous No.52872393]

>>52872129
>>52872150
>>52872214
>shut the fuck up paki muslim
>do not redeem token sir, number will go up
>sirs please deposit tokens on layer 2 arbitrum, the bridge being compromised is no problem sirs
Ok pajeet.

[Anonymous No.52872450]

I implore everyone to click on this person's ID so you can get a sense of his sentiment towards Link.
>>52872393
I'll let you make your own mind up as to his intentions.

[Anonymous No.52872476]

>>52872450
>oh noe he says bad thing about chainlink
yes i do and unless sirgay delivers anything that doesn't reek of scam within an acceptable timeframe i will continue to do so.

[Anonymous No.52872495]

>>52872476
You're low IQ trash and add nothing but bitterness and cringe to the board. You are the cancer that is killing /biz/.

[Anonymous No.52872514]

>>52847139
tell me where to park $20k and go away til 2024

[Anonymous No.52872540]

>>52872495
the cancer that is killing biz is shills like (you), scams, paid jannies/mods >>52871851 and the bearmarket.

[Anonymous No.52872639]

>>52847139
shut up you fucking larp
the only insider here is me inside your mom

[Anonymous No.52873359]

>>52869584
Imagine my shock when CCIP is launched in december of 2023...

[Anonymous No.52873776]

>>52872214
>and it will build this success off of the back of Chainlink
this is what parasitic jews do best

[Anonymous No.52875640]

>>52847139
Sounds bearish as fuck

[Anonymous No.52877010]

lol sounds great man, this isn't an empty canister of hopium like the other 1000 insider threads in the past 5 years, right?

would ask for proof but I am sure you "dont want to get in trouble" and/or "get doxxed" and/or "get killed by the great reset consortium"

[Anonymous No.52878755]

>>52863174
How did you get around the staking limit? I know that people used multiple wallets but don't you need a wallet that has had some link since at least 2020?

[Anonymous No.52878875]

>>52878755
Early Access only filled up half the pool. General Access, any address could get in.

[Anonymous No.52878956]

>>52847928
By January we would be out of the bear market. No new ATHs yet though. But watch out for payment related projects like Xpress and coti

[Anonymous No.52879059]

>>52878875
Oh shit, I didn't realise. Oh well, got 7k out 21k staked. Wagmi