[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 1.44 MB, 1067x1051, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52817231 No.52817231 [Reply] [Original]

Maybe some of you here can help me understand this more.

Currently there exists an idea that there is an existential threat to
BTC in the form of BSV. Meaning that there is a possability, at some point in the future, that miners could eventually switch from mining BTC to BSV.

I want to discuss, what factors could influence this event. There are certain mechanisms generally speaking that could effect this shift, including:
- Miner profitability
- demand for on chain services
- demand of microtransactions

These things may very well have an effect however I still remain skeptical that it could result in what SV'ers claim would lead to "Hyper-Bitcoinization". I am fully open to the concept however was wondering if anyone had a more nuanced view?

I don't hold any BSV, however I am open to the idea of putting 5% of my portfolio to hedge against short tail risk.

>> No.52817269

BSV is a scam coin

>> No.52817271

>>52817231
>hyper bitcoinization
>a more nuanced view
What a load of horseshit, there's your nuanced view

>> No.52817308

I would also like to add that the collapse of the BSV futures and future closure of Bittrex futures increases this probablity.

Also please dont mention Craig his "patents" or conspiracy theories. I am purley interested in this from an economic perspective.

>> No.52817379
File: 61 KB, 1849x455, Bitcoin-SV-Block-Details.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52817379

>>52817231
It's already more profitable by a small margin to mine on BSV

>> No.52817413
File: 41 KB, 1880x469, How many Transact6ions.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52817413

>>52817231
and WAY more transactions
https://bsvdata.com/applications

>> No.52817417
File: 35 KB, 594x680, peer to peer for less than pennies.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52817417

>>52817231
and demand on microtransactions

>> No.52819506

We are able to do over 100 K now every second.
Next year will be in the millions.
A transaction can be one Sat.
That is base layer.

There is no Lightning layer. A layer by definition must be within a transaction. To say lightning is a layer is dishonest or ignorant.

https://twitter.com/Dr_CSWright/status/1601163175424294913