[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 31 KB, 554x584, 1670446348652487.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52785609 No.52785609 [Reply] [Original]

Do poolers have rights as investors or did they assume they do? Were Linkpool ever legally obligated to share revenue?

>> No.52785631

yeah they have a right to haircuts

>> No.52786094

>>52785609
ideally we need a canadian anon of the 186

>> No.52786309

>>52785609
https://s3.linkpool.io/LinkPool+Whitepaper.pdf

This is what was promised on the ICO, a way to distribute 25/75 the revenue of staking, not the actual node revenue

Also Jonny rimms horses

>> No.52786713

>>52786309
Is 25/75 still being distributed?

>> No.52786844

>>52785609
Nah no way, Linkpool is a registered company and the equity to that company was never connected to the tokens. The tokens were a free agreement, but they were sold as
>muh code is law
until it wasn't

>> No.52786969

>>52786713
Only 20% of the rewards, but they are stLINK, which is constantly rebased, so it's a bit more

>> No.52787219

>>52786309
>Distributed to Owners
>With the practical example specified in section 4, we can take the result to then calculate an
example revenue generated to the owners, contributors and stakers
>owners
>owners
because they didn't explicitly say token owners, there is reasonable assumption investors could interpret this as company ownership

>> No.52787242

>>52786969
Are you still holding anon?