GDAX/Coinbase Buys

File: 8 KB, 225x225, 4L_Z95fOHsf.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

GDAX/Coinbase Buys Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:01:28 No.5277546 [Reply] [Original]

Buying has been enabled.

NORMIES ARE PUMPING THIS. 4K NOW AND CONTINUING.

I don’t care about this BTV vs BCC/BCH war. I’m in it to make money. The only ones negative about this are the no coiners or the ones that can’t afford to buy anything.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:02:22 No.5277581 >>5277546 BUY HIGH SELL LOW

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:02:25 No.5277584 >>5277546 coinbase still can't buy, only gdax. there's still time.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:05:39 No.5277724

>>5277584
Coinbase is now enabled for buys. I just tried testing it out. Originally it was only GDAX. Coinbase enabled buys.

I called this earlier. They weren’t gonna enabled buys until 5 because of insider trading suspicions. The SEC was monitoring them. As soon as their employees leave the building, they have no control over them. Not to mention the abundance of normies getting out of work as well.

4.3k already

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:07:46 No.5277804 I'm making a killing moving BCH from bittrex to GDAX. Change to eth then rinse and repeat.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:12:19 No.5277983 BTC is finally crashing

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:15:44 No.5278102 >>5277546 any word when btc/bch trading is available? So far this is only exciting for the US

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:22:20 No.5278346 >>5277724 still disable for me

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:23:09 No.5278376 Bitcoin to 10k by EOY! BOTH OF THEM

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:23:57 No.5278404 Still can't buy through coinbase. In US

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:24:30 No.5278422 File: 14 KB, 256x300, trust-me-goyim.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] There is still time time to get in guys. This is just a minor pullback.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:25:07 No.5278444 File: 2.43 MB, 3082x2212, horse plane.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fw-Nn2Cnbp8&feature=youtu.be&t=6408

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:27:26 No.5278556 This shitcoin is unneccessarily ruining the market. Even if it flipped for BCH, you still have to wait over and hour for 6 confirmations, wtf is the point of this shit

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:29:09 No.5278636 SELL WALL @ 4100 REKT WE MOONIN

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:29:55 No.5278672 File: 1.43 MB, 400x400, 1390946617836.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5278376

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:30:56 No.5278708 >>5277546 IT fun watching it because it moves so fast BTC is SLOW as fucking dog shit

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:31:17 No.5278720 >>5278636 IS THIS THE FLIPPENING? OH BOY AND NORMIES AREN'T EVEN ALLOWED IN YET

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:31:59 No.5278742 >>5278720 Flipping like crazy

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:33:04 No.5278788 >>5278556 That's why you buy Ethereum while it's low. Investing in the coin that people are using to move money off the exchange paid off for LTC

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:33:27 No.5278800 >>5277546 we're rich guys, we did it

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:34:41 No.5278846 >>5277546 there are a billion other cunts fomo buying this too you know

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:35:38 No.5278886

>>5277546

Just here to let you guys know buy supporting Bitcoin Cash you're supporting the coin (((they))) impelemented to destroy satoshis original invention because they can't control it. This is just a government controlled mission to take control of bitcoin and crypto. You're basically killing your own market by supporting BCASH.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:36:41 No.5278921 >>5278886 fuck wall street thou

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:38:09 No.5278981 >>5278886 >tells the exact opposite of whats happening in reality ok

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:39:17 No.5279018 >>5277546 get in on the pump faggots were going on a moon mission https://discord.gg/srFAtER

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:39:47 No.5279042 >>5278886 in that case, why is the bitcoin core team so lazy, dilatory and reluctant to implement all the necessary changes to fix this ugly broken mess that bitcoin is?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:42:05 No.5279128 >>5278886 \| \ \| 3 \|

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:43:07 No.5279167

>>5279042

They are actually not, it's the miners who are kind of holding them hostage. Thats because they're offered very lucrative political deals to do so. We're getting played by politics here, I can tell you that. Holding BTC since 2009 by the way. Around 4chan even longer.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:44:03 No.5279220 >>5278886 lmao >corecoin isn't owned by the banks

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:45:27 No.5279274 >>5279167 >holding BTC since 2009 why are you even here? shouldn't you be mega rich?

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:47:38 No.5279364

>>5279274

This is where I came across BTC in the first place, /b/ to be precise, I still like to come here a couple times a week and browse /biz/. And yes, I'm still picking coins and investing, small portions for good projects for idiological reasons obviously.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:48:13 No.5279388

how can you idiots not see the charade

trade the swings as much as you want
but don't be retarded with this flippening bullshit
it's A FORKED CHINESE SCAM!!!!

the books are being autistically pumped by whales/
nothing out of the ordinary from the bcash playbook
BCASH
BCASh
BCASH

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:49:27 No.5279443

>>5278981
Bitmain doesn't want Segwit because it fixes the exploit they use in their patented AsicBoost shit. They're literally shilling BCH because they want to keep people using their hardware. Since using that exploit is more efficient, that hardware is more popular. And that hardware has a backdoor in it[0] that they can use to shutdown miner, which gives Bitmain control over the Bitcoin network.

[0] http://www.antbleed.com/

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:50:46 No.5279488 >>5279167 Mining is shit anyway. If the bitcoin core team wasn't a bunch of pretentious little faggots, they'd switch to POS already and give the chink miners a middle finger

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:50:53 No.5279493 >>5278788 that's not why ltc pumped...

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:53:55 No.5279609

USD/BCH buys have been temporarily suspended. If you were watching the order book at the time, you'd see that within 10 minutes from enabling, they were going to run out of BCH again.Huge sell walls, blanked out in seconds.

When this is enabled, BCH will go to $6K almost instantly.

They are keeping it off for lack of liquidity.

It would be higher than 6k now if they'd have left it on.

If you have BCH, put it on GDAX now and set a sell for $6-8K if you don't want to hold it. It will get filled within 24 hours.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:54:08 No.5279624

>>5279488

I think you didn't understand what Bitcoin was all about in the first place. It was understood and conecepted as a storage of wealth, a sort of digital version of real gold. If you stored your wealth in gold would you transport it on a daily basis? Probably not. Probably not even once a year. That's what bitcoin is about. It was never intended as a payment coin or anything like that. It's a store of value which you store securely and only use and transfer if you really have to. That's where mining makes absolute sense.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:56:54 No.5279703 anyone not american and have "view only, not available in your region" on GDAX for USD BCH?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 17:57:26 No.5279720 >>5278886 That's pretty weak man, you core fucks are desperate now hey?

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:00:30 No.5279839

>>5279624
but it WAS intended as a payment coin, so STFU. besides, everybody knows that mining is an outdated judaic concept that needs to go and leave room for more just and fair means of processing transactions

>>5279703
who cares about that gay exchange, there are tons of alternatives

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:02:13 No.5279901

>>5279167
>>5278886

Literally fucking kill yourself you pathetic LARPing piece of shit. ASIC miners have much more to lose compared to GPU/CPU miners. ASICs do one thing, that's MINE BITCOIN based on the CURRENT MINING ALGORITHM. OTHER THAN THAT, ASICS DO NOTHING. MEANING THAT IF YOU FUCK UP THE NETWORK, MINERS LOSE EVERYTHING, INCENTIVIZING THEM TO KEEP THE NETWORK STRONG.

This is the most aggressive shilling technique and has been aggressively ramped up within the last few days.

They are adapting to the ways in with /pol/ articulates in attempts to act as if they are one of us. This person just blatantly lied about what is happening lmao. Bitcoin Cash is the preservation of Satoshi Nakamoto's original vision. How the fuck can someone even believe this after literally listening to Core developers say that SATOSHI WAS AN IDIOT/SELLOUT/LOSER/DIDNT KNOW WHAT HE WAS DOING.

You are a lying piece of shit and should kill yourself promptly. Hopefully BTC dying will cause that to happen, but we both know you haven't sold a single satoshi's worth of your Bitcoin Cash. Fucking faggot.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:04:01 No.5279965 >>5278886 People that say "bcash" remind me of the same petty cunts that say "Drumpf." That's all you got left.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:04:49 No.5279983 >>5279624 >It was never intended as a payment coin deluded... brainwashed by Core.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:08:23 No.5280098
File: 4 KB, 190x224, gdax.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

If you want proof of what will happen to BCH when buys are reenabled on Coinbase, look at the GDAX history between the times of 13:48 PST and 14:10 PST.

https://status.coinbase.com/

That's the window that buying was enabled, and it went to the moon almost instantly.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:09:51 No.5280136 >>5280098 >That's the window that buying was enabled That's the window where Roger was talking on CNBC about BCH

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:11:13 No.5280184 >>5280098 Mooon

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:11:51 No.5280209 >>5280136 USD buying was suspended at 14:10, the massive pump stopped at exactly 14:10. They were going to run out of BCH.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:13:41 No.5280262

You are calling me a shill while I'm just telling you my point of view. I'm almost fully out of the market anyway since I don't need any more profits or anything. I'm just following whats happening around it and as someone that went with Bitcoin from 2009 to today, keep in mind thats 18 years, I have seen a lot happen and the whole Bcash (I will continue call it that) thing
would have been laughed at back by the old community. Your probably not around long enough to know that anyway. Have fun beeing enslaved by your own cryptocurrency.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:13:43 No.5280264 BCH buys not enabled on Coinbase at the moment, when it enables... MOOOON

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:14:56 No.5280305 >>5280262 8 years obviously, typo.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:15:07 No.5280312 >>5279983 Seriously. This dude probably started researching bitcoin this year.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:16:09 No.5280347

>>5280262
Really? So what you're saying is that Satoshi Nakamoto, the man who CREATED BITCOIN in 2009, who you would have DIRECTLY seen communicate with active users on bitcointalk, is an idiot, correct? You're saying that what Bitcoin Core is turning Bitcoin into, is EXACTLY what Satoshi wanted? You literally are so nervous as to me pointing out your shitty shilling tactic you can't even fucking quote me before replying as fast as possible. Kys faggot. Anyone who believes this lying piece of shit deserves to lose their immovable money.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:17:04 No.5280389 >>5279443 that's bullshit because the "exploit" fix has nothing to do with segwit. and if you look at it that way, all ASICs are "exploits". You should be supporting a scrypt or x11/x13 coin. Or a PoS coin. Because you are contradicting yourself.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:17:33 No.5280406 it makes me sad that I'mm too stupid to understand or profit from any of this

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:18:43 No.5280440 >>528040 Buy BCH the second it's enabled on Coinbase. Sell tomorrow for 100% profit. Pretty easy.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:19:30 No.5280461 >>5280406 1. Buy bitcoin cash right the fuck now 2. Hold for a few years 3. Be rich

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:19:33 No.5280463

>>5280347
Where have I said that he is an idiot?
I think he and Hal who created the coding are geniusses, you're just portraying his vision false since cryptocurrency as a payment was never their vision. They were both 90s cypherpunks. They wanted to disrupt banks and financial institutions by establishing a digital wealth store and thus supporting real fiat cash by leaving the banks out. I have no clue how old you are but if you we're around in the early 90s you would know from what kind of mindset cypherpunks and the first digitalists in the early 2000s would come from.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:19:36 No.5280464 Roger Ver on CNBC Fast Money December 20, 2017 https://youtu.be/L7s7-09-oms

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:19:59 No.5280475 >>5280209 they DID run out of bch, hence the "pump" normies fomo without checking order books. Nobody wants to sell. Checkmate, Core

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:20:07 No.5280480 >>5278376 id be ok with this since i have equal amounts of both

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:20:39 No.5280501

>>5280347
>Satoshi Nakamoto, the man who CREATED BITCOIN in 2009, who you would have DIRECTLY seen communicate with active users on bitcointalk, is an idiot, correct?

Satoshi isn't some holy figure. He's just some guy (or a collection of guys). They don't have to have gotten everything right.

Don't see this as an endorsement of Core, but don't hold Satoshi's words as the gospel

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:20:42 No.5280502 >>5280347 implying that satoshi nakamoto didnt actually want to create bitcoin. he was looking after bcash but didnt have ver's vision to do so

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:21:31 No.5280524

>>5280463
You're literally a twitter faggot. What did you do, go onto every faggot core developers numale beta cuck profile and check for the most used buzzword to come here and tout? If Satoshi is a genius, and you are at the same time supporting Core, you're a fucking retard.

BITCOIN : A PEER TO PEER ELECTRONIC CASH SYSTEM

SUCK A FUCKING COCK RETARD.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:21:52 No.5280541 File: 1.54 MB, 480x264, 1507688878510.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5280464 >"Insider trading is a non-crime" - Roger Ver

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:21:54 No.5280543 >>5279609 its already enabled tardmonkey

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:22:03 No.5280551 File: 33 KB, 540x540, clint.eastwood.cat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5277546 what the fuck are you talking about, мaть твoю блядь? 6:21 PM - 6:22 PM → O: 3,664.97H: 3,679.97L: 3,607.49C: 3,628.89V: 240

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:23:59 No.5280606

>>5280463
>you can do this without your currency being accepted for payments
Jesus dude, have you ever heard of "co-opting" a movement?

Did you really think that wouldn't happen to bitcoin? That's what "Core" is. you being involved from the beginning (allegedly) doesn't stop you from getting blindsided by greed. That's how they always win.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:24:08 No.5280610 >>5280543 Check again dumb fuck. And check the coinbase status page I linked. Update - BCH buys & sells have been temporarily paused. Dec 20, 14:10 PST You'll know when it's reenabled. BCH price will be $6K-$8K.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:25:17 No.5280643 >>5280524 >compiles an insult with every current buzzword insult >accuses of checking for most used buzzwords why are BCH evangelist so aggressive and insulting

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:25:27 No.5280647

>>5278886
>>5279167
>>5279364
>>5279901
>>5280262
>>5280305
>>5280347
>>5280463
>>5280524

For anyone who missed this shitty shilling attempt. The person shilling here actually INTENTIONALLY didn't quote me because they don't want people to understand why ASICs make a network more secure in comparison to shitcoins being mined with GPU and CPUs. There is a considerable stake in the health of the network when buying an ASIC miner, you have to make sure the network survives or your investment is useless. Don't let people like this lie without being reprimanded. Everything this person has said is a contradiction of previous statements, if you believe them you are either incredibly lost and need to study or you're purposely trying to kill Bitcoin.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:25:36 No.5280653

>>5280524

Wow, you act like you're 12. Maybe you should back off the whole cryptocurrency thing a bit and learn how to discuss things properly. Yes, I already understood that you want to make it a "peer to peer electronic cash system" with BCash. But thats not what it was intended to be in the first place. Period. And nobody would have taken a lunatic like Roger Ver serious back then, even though I think he's a clever guy.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:26:47 No.5280704 and when they enable buying again? хyй

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:26:56 No.5280706 File: 81 KB, 1366x768, earns.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5280610 WOAH WHATS ALL THIS

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:27:48 No.5280743 >>5280647 >implying I'm intentionally not quoting you >>5279901 >>5280347 >>5280524 >>5280647 Here you go, I think I forgot to quote you once. I don't get how you can behave like you do. You should grow up.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:28:08 No.5280757 >>5280647 >He thinks PoW is the only way to successfully secure a network Enjoy being left in the dust in a couple years

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:28:50 No.5280782 >>5279901 Thank you for putting this into words that I could not. Underrated post

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:29:12 No.5280799

>>5280706

That's called GDAX, the exchange run by Coinbase. Trading is enabled there, but direct from USD buys on coinbase.com are not.

Check my above post to see what happened when they were enabled for 20 minutes. They didn't have enough BCH to keep the books open.

Check back when it's enabled again. You're about to see some shit.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:29:36 No.5280814 >>5280647 If you x your either z or y how to spot the ideologically subverted

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:29:58 No.5280823 File: 29 KB, 240x273, 1511657433074.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5280647 wojack bambino

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:31:15 No.5280862 File: 5 KB, 326x213, coinb.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5280706

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:31:38 No.5280875

>>5279624
>I think you didn't understand what Bitcoin was all about in the first place. It was understood and conecepted as a storage of wealth
I hope you don't actually believe this you deluded corelet.

"Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
Abstract. A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution."

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:31:49 No.5280880 Anyway, if anyone has some questions about the "old days" here or any crypto related stuff, I'm still around so AMA I guess.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:33:11 No.5280919 When will GDAX enable BTC/BCH trading?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:33:56 No.5280948 >>5280880 GO BACK TO R/BITCOIN AND STAY THERE FAGGOT.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:35:37 No.5280997 >>5280461 ya

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:35:38 No.5281000 >>5280948 Full caps heroes like you would have been banned in an instant back then. Go to bed, wojack bambino.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:36:07 No.5281013 guys when is that sweet normie money piling in? im getting anxious

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:36:19 No.5281020

>>5280262
>out of the market
some of us plan to use bitcoin to buy shit irl not just buy shitcoins on exchanges
>old community
who the fuck do you think you are to claim knowing the old community. if you had a voice and you just let all this coreshit happen go fuck yoursef, if not fuck off

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:37:39 No.5281058 >>5281013 It happened for a brief and glorious moment. They said "temporarily suspended" but I'm getting anxious too.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:38:11 No.5281081 File: 169 KB, 400x416, 1503695721156.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5277546 LET ME FUCKING BUUUYY AAAAAASDGHADGHGDA

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:38:36 No.5281095

>>5281013
i do genuinely think BCH is going to replace BTC entirely. it's everything Bitcoin is but better, has the brand name, is endorsed by major players and original creators. only thing BTC has going for it anymore is the brand name, which is quickly failing as people realize it's a shitty product

BCH has already been put on the major trading sites and is clearly set for the moon. it's the next big coin, and probably will end up being the major #1 most used crypto all around as Bitcoin itself quietly fades into history

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:39:08 No.5281118 >>5281058 oh they stopped it again? why? too volatile? jesus christ. this is getting retarded

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:39:48 No.5281133 >>5281095 >and original creators Craig isn't Satoshi

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:41:01 No.5281160

>>5281133
no, but Satoshi quietly supports BCH and recognizes that Bitcoin has reached the point where it is more of a lumbering brute than the streamlined product it is capable of being. which is why he has allowed the Bitcoin name to be attached to this product, recognizing that it is simply the real, actual "for mass use" version of Bitcoin, which was rushed out and is irreperable

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:41:23 No.5281176 >>5280706 GDAX =/= COINBASE

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:41:24 No.5281178 $4,500 in Korean exchanges

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:42:01 No.5281199 >>5279624 >this is your mind on blockstream

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:42:45 No.5281224

I dont see why they need BCH to sell, they can just make it auto purchase on the BCH/USD pairing on GDAX when someone buys on Coinbase. Sure they would have to move the price so its always on a win price for Coinbase, but it's easy enough to implement.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:43:03 No.5281233 u guys don't really believe about this flippening shit right ? how stupid can someone be

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:43:11 No.5281239 BCH is showing signs of a serious fucking moon in the near future

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:43:45 No.5281258 >>5281118 Yeah, they had it open for about 30 minutes. Price went from 3700-4400 almost immediately and they suspended it. Check the status here: https://status.coinbase.com/

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:44:18 No.5281271 >>5281160 don't claim to know what mistery man does

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:44:35 No.5281288 why won't it fucking moon? it dipped hard why the fuck can't it pump equally hard?

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:44:36 No.5281286

>>5281199
hes right though. Bitcoin is an old, archaic lumbering turd of a coin and even the Chinese and Korean are starting to realize that it just isn't feasible. transfer times are a shit, and everything about it scream "inaccessible" and not a mass product.

BCH?

why do you think it was invented. "MUH NORMIES"

guess what normies are the definition of existence. without normies you are a SHIT

moon time IS coming

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:45:26 No.5281314 >>5281176 You're right, GDAX is the part that makes money, coinbase is the part that loses money If GDAX + Coinbase = 0 Then GDAX + Coinbase -Coinbase = 0 -Coinbase Then GDAX = -Coinbase Therefore GDAX =/= Coinbase

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:45:27 No.5281315

>>5281224

I think that's what a USD buy on coinbase.com does. It places a market order on GDAX.

The "problem" is, they were running out of BCH and the price was skyrocketing, I guess to quickly. The sell book was on track to be empty in an hour at that pace.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:45:47 No.5281333 File: 50 KB, 938x504, Screen Shot 2017-12-20 at 5.45.29 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] still not for sale

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:46:44 No.5281364 >>5281286 I'm actually in favor of BCH. Maybe you should actually read better.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:47:07 No.5281376 >>5281224 ....Yeah, that's how it works already. So coinbase doesn't actually have any thing TO SELL, get it? Price is determined by the market, not coinbase.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:47:07 No.5281377 File: 29 KB, 250x243, 1494469233775.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5281314 IN ENGLISH, DOC!

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:48:08 No.5281418 >>5281315 I doubt they will sell the orderbook, there is around 10,000 BCH on there.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:48:13 No.5281422 File: 41 KB, 480x360, 1513715308332.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5281133 Satoshi literally said increase the blocksize. The "muh small blocks!" initiative was created by these cunts from Blockstream who wanna create sidechains.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:49:10 No.5281465 >>5281376 Are you seriously asking me if I understand my own idea?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:49:56 No.5281491 is it too late to buy? I have about 1k

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:49:57 No.5281493 File: 1.97 MB, 400x535, 1513736366760.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5281377 you first!

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:50:04 No.5281497 >>5281288 Because coinbase keeps putting BCH buys on hold

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:50:17 No.5281505

>>5280389
>that's bullshit because the "exploit" fix has nothing to do with segwit.
AsicBoost does not work with Segwit. It's not an intentional fix, but that's why Bitmain doesn't want Segwit.

>and if you look at it that way, all ASICs are "exploits".
ASICs aren't the problem. It's that it's patented, which gives him control over the market for over a decade.

>You should be supporting a scrypt or x11/x13 coin.
Those also have ASICs so I'm not sure what you're on about.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:51:00 No.5281532 >>5281465 Well at a minimum you don't understand that it's not your idea, so, yeah.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:51:42 No.5281557 >tfw when I justed myself buying at 4.3k

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:52:23 No.5281586 >>5281532 So you cant have an idea that someone else has had? I didn't know that.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:52:54 No.5281601 >>5281557 >>tfw when I justed myself buying at 4.3k It'll be back to 4k or even 5k when coinbase buys are reenabled. Don't worry. I'm thinking maybe even 6K withing 24 hours.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:56:47 No.5281735 >>5281601 More like all those normalfags are going to take the BCH that appeared in their account and sell it.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:56:47 No.5281736

>>5281505
>ASICs aren't the problem. It's that it's patented, which gives him control over the market for over a decade.
Control that he earned by innovating a superior product. Don't like it? Make something better. As long as you aren't reliant on copying his ideas, you should do fine.
>Those also have ASICs so I'm not sure what you're on about.
My mistake, I'm not up to date on PoW shitcoin technology. It doesn't surprise me. There's always going to be at least 1 PoW coin, but I don't think there's much more room in the long term. I'm invested in more innovative projects that hybridize PoW, PoS and P2P systems. See my screenshot for spoilers ;)

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:58:19 No.5281793 bch is a shitcoin and if you try to invest in it for a quick profit you'll probably lose it you're better off buying the insane dip on btc

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 18:59:04 No.5281830 >>5281586 When someone else is already using "your idea" because they came up with it 4 and a half years ago, no. When "your idea" is just you finally realizing how their system works, no. That's not an idea, that is a realization.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:00:06 No.5281864 File: 5 KB, 250x166, 1354993087371s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5281793 >buying btc

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:00:12 No.5281865

>>5281735

Wrong. Those people have been selling already on GDAX. Their coins are almost gone.

When buys were enabled, the price went from 3700-4400 almost instantly and they had to disable buys again.

If they enable buys again today, BCH will be 6K within 24 hours, mark my words.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:00:30 No.5281875

>>5281505
>asicBoost
so core got salty cuz some guys found a way to increase efficency and they wanted to profit off it? call the freedom police quick!
>segwit
break the network into trust nodes that decide what goes on the blockchain instead of habing the freedom to have each transaction treated equaly
>last two points
core locked the comunity out of developing bitcoin and gets to be judge and jury
fud harded valued comunity member

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:00:57 No.5281888 >>5281830 Can you explain how you know that they are doing as I said? If not, fuck off being a moron.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:02:08 No.5281927 >>5281875 >and they wanted to profit off it? >Miner centralization is a-okay

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:02:42 No.5281943 >>5281865 unironically this

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:02:58 No.5281954 >>5281865 I believe you, hopefully the price on binance moons with it. Just bought 650$ worth and set a sell target of .35 HERE WE GO BOYS

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:04:51 No.5282013 >>5281954 always do opposite to what /biz/ says

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:05:32 No.5282030 >>5281927 nigga do you actually believe in the ASICBoost meme? There is no evidence that it really saves that much money, it was just Greg Maxwell lying that he "reverse-engineered" the ASIC chips LUL

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:06:04 No.5282049

>>5281875
>so core got salty cuz some guys found a way to increase efficency and they wanted to profit off it? call the freedom police quick!
The problem isn't that the mining hardware is centralized (that's a problem, but less of one). It's that it's centralized and Bitmain ADDS A BACKDOOR TO THEIR HARDWARE. If the majority of the network is using their ASIC miners, then they can shut them all down with the backdoor, then bring their own ASIC miners online (because they manufacture them) and own the network.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:07:32 No.5282113 >>5282013 They told me to buy antshares back in the day, currently up 7x from that buy. Just don't buy the obvious shill coins, like ark, dgb, bitbean and whatever memes theyre shilling these days.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:08:26 No.5282142 >>5281081 tfw GDAX servers are so swamped right now I can't even create an account >If this is the norm for buy/sell booms on this site i don't even know if i want an account anymore

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:10:07 No.5282204 Normies are literally going out of their ways to buy this shit. Get rekt, BZC is the only one they'll buy for fun.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:10:37 No.5282222 File: 89 KB, 1154x324, bitbeann.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5282113

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:15:29 No.5282422 File: 1.10 MB, 1500x1491, 1513810786227.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5280524

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:16:17 No.5282448 >>5282142 this isn't the norm for me. Huge influx of people since thanksgiving + BCH got added. Usually I don't have these issues.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:18:49 No.5282537 >>5282422 Oh look someone made a jpeg.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:20:19 No.5282588 >>5282448 thanks for the input, I'm really only giving it a shot for these sweet pre-coinbase BCH buys

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:20:54 No.5282611 >>5282422 >Barred from entry to the US But here he is just last month in LA. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQbYToRKgpM

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:21:40 No.5282637 >>5282422 didn't know the us dept of justice was the authority on who can fork btc, the only piece of this stupid pic that is actually relevant.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:21:56 No.5282643 >>5282422 do you actually believe Roger Ver "made" BCH?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:26:55 No.5282799 Imagine being so stupid that you think bcore is the real bitcoin. Lmfao, I'm gonna be laughing so hard in a couple of weeks.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:29:52 No.5282905 >>5281888 THEY FUCKING TELL YOU holy shit, you need me to spoonfeed you this, but I'm the moron?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:31:17 No.5282955 File: 2.38 MB, 2918x2901, vercash.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5282422 fake news

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:31:39 No.5282969 >>5282905 Yes please, can you link to that information?

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:35:00 No.5283107

>>5282969
Yes, but I won't. Just like I wouldn't link directly to the press releases (circa july/august) from GDAX and Coinbase that implied they would support Bitcoin Cash trading if there was significant adoption by the end of the year.

I feel no need to prove facts. I get to do the right thing by informing people of the truth, I get to make money when they don't listen to me, and I get to drink their tears when I am proven right.

It's a pretty sweet gig.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:38:50 No.5283250 >>5283107 I know about the trading being offered, I am saying about coinbase sales being automatically linked to gdax, so that coinbase doesn't have to own any coins. It seems you don't know what I was even talking about.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:38:54 No.5283254 File: 183 KB, 1080x1920, Screenshot_20171221-023543.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5282049 >chinks will be chinks problem solved

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:39:01 No.5283262 >>5280262 >Im already rich i dont care if core makes btc an unusable shitcoin quit larping core is finished

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:39:46 No.5283289 Who are these idiots saying they can't buy it? I can buy it fine on bittrex.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:41:01 No.5283325 >>5283289 Retards. They're saying you can't buy it on Coinbase. You can, however, buy it on GDAX.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:42:15 No.5283378 >>5283289 You can buy it on gdax, binance, bittrex, at least. The price won't move until USD buys are reenabled on coinbase.com

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:44:40 No.5283465 >>5283378 >The price won't move until USD buys are reenabled on coinbase.com Eh, I think it will move up a little from traders buying it in preperation for that.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:44:49 No.5283470 >>5283378 would it be worth buying on coinbase once the stop is lifted? that shit should moon right?

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:45:33 No.5283498

>>5283250
You really are a brainlet, huh?

You know about the trading that is already happening? Then I guess eventually you'll figure out that I'm right about this too, when it shoves itself in your face so obviously that you can't possibly miss it. Coinbase is probably gonna have to give a painfully simplified breakdown of their operations to sate the complaints of this massive influx of simpletons such as yourself. You won't be waiting too long.

I knew the ins and outs of how Coinbase worked before I ever gave them money, over 4 years ago. What's your excuse?

I brought up the trading scenario as an EXAMPLE. If you hear something you don't understand, work on understanding it. Don't try to coerce other's into satisfying your intellectual sloth.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:45:40 No.5283503 >>5283378 As soon as transactions are enabled on Coinbase the BCH toilet is going to get flushed. All those normalfags already have BTC and are just going to sell the BCH they got.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:47:06 No.5283564 >>5283470 >would it be worth buying on coinbase once the stop is lifted? that shit should moon right? Buy it somewhere else now retard. You won't be able to get in quick enough if you wait till then.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:48:12 No.5283596 >>5283465 It did move up, 200% in the last month. That was the buyup prior to the boom. It's been steady at $3500-3700 all day except the brief period where it was enabled on coinbase, where it shot up to 4400 within minutes.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:48:28 No.5283610 >>5283470 rule of thumb: If it's easy, it's not worth it. The opportunity has already passed.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:49:11 No.5283635 >>5283596 Was it cut off or?

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:49:38 No.5283660

>>5283503

I feel sorry for you if you actually believe this.

Normalfags don't have stacks of BCH in their coinbase account. The ones that did sold it on gdax already. Did you see the volume? 100K BCH in 24 hours.

You're in for a very, very rude awakening soon.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:49:51 No.5283672 >>5283503 What BCH? Normies got in after the fork

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:50:17 No.5283686 How can I be automatically notified when coinbase re-enables BCH purchases?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:51:08 No.5283716 File: 19 KB, 907x365, coinb2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5283635 Yes, temporarily disabled. The demand was too high and the buys were eating through the sell book. Huge walls, disappeared in seconds.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:51:40 No.5283738 File: 33 KB, 610x614, STABLE.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5283660 >Did you see the volume? 100K BCH in 24 hours. Yes, it keeps getting pump and dumped.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:52:18 No.5283764

>>5283498
So you explain how they trade by linking me details that they do trade...
I know they trade you fucking moron.
I responded originally because someone said they stopped sales of BCH as they had run out of supply. Considering they have 10k coins in the GDAX orderbook, I thought it would be intelligent to suggest they just sell from the fucking order book.
Then you interject with your 'superior intellect' with utter bullshit that has nothing to do with my original point, but you continue to defend your idiotic posting.

Please fuck off.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:52:25 No.5283772 >>5283686 I have an alert on blockfolio for when it passes 5k so I know it's actually pumping

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:52:55 No.5283794 >>5283686 https://status.coinbase.com/ Check here. The price will move very quickly when it is.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:53:06 No.5283798

>>5283503
but what if normies get their bcash and decide to read up about it and get informed. having learned about the utter bullshit bcore has done to bitcoin and using their normie brain they decide to bury bcore and become active members of the bitcoin comunity

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:53:22 No.5283805 >>5283738 >you can retrade the same coins in a single pump You're a special kind of stupid, aren't ya?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:53:24 No.5283806 >>5283686 >f5 f5 f5 f5 f5 f5 f5 f5 f5 f5 f5 f5

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:54:18 No.5283838 >>5283738 You see that huge peak in the middle of the day on the depth? That's when buys were enabled. When buys go live again, it will go up quickly.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:55:20 No.5283884 >>5283805 >Buy lots of volume at low price >Normalfags FOMO >Dump >Normalfags panic sell >Repeat.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:55:41 No.5283903 >>5283798 Every normie that tests a BCH send will never go back to BTC. I'm expecting BTC/BCH to find balance at 10k, if BTC doesn't just shit the bed entirely. We'll find out within the next 30 days.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:56:26 No.5283923 >>5283903 If that was the case they'd just use Ethereum

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:57:35 No.5283974 >>5283923 BCH fees are cheaper than ethereum. Don't get me wrong, BCH isn't the best thing out there, but it's a hell of a lot better than BTC.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:59:18 No.5284046 >>5283974 LTC is cheaper and faster than both, so by that logic you should flush your scamcoins and join the silver master race.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 19:59:18 No.5284047

>>5283764
>there were 10k coins in the order book when they stopped market buys
>10k coins is enough for 100k volume
>I can't even figure out how information I recieve relates to questions I ask, unless its exactly the answer I was expecting
I can't help you.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:00:32 No.5284084 and when coinbase runs out of BCH again we are dumping right after?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:01:25 No.5284109 >>5284084 Ssh, don't let everyone know the plan.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:02:33 No.5284140 >>5284046 LTC might be around the same price, but it's not faster than BCH. ethereum is fast, but its practically as expensive as core.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:05:25 No.5284241 File: 36 KB, 600x800, 1438913540537.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] after bcash moons from normies buying off of coinbase, what should i trade my bcash into. I'm thinking XRP, XLM, and XMR for a long hodl

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:05:57 No.5284257 >>5284047 I was watching the GDAX site when it went live, they didn't eat into the orderbook much at all, there was 10k coins then and still there is now and they have sold almost 100k BCH. Stop justifying your stupidity.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:06:54 No.5284284 Dont care about the flippening or whatever, just need to know is this shit safe to scalp?, its not gonna dump like last night again is it?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:08:46 No.5284346 >>5284284 It won't dump again once coinbase gets their shit together.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:09:48 No.5284385 >>5284241 I'm moving all my BCH to XMR. I don't give a shit about BCH, but this a good opportunity. BCH to 6K by tomorrow.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:09:56 No.5284389 File: 45 KB, 1663x450, 643678.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] kek

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:11:57 No.5284454
File: 35 KB, 1281x482, A_TOILET.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>5284284
> its not gonna dump like last night again is it?
It's still dumping. Cashfags are praying that it stops when Goybase opens up again. In actuality, those poor normalfags are going to buy BCH with a fucking bank transfer and not receive it for seven goddamn days while being locked into the price and getting dumped on.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:12:07 No.5284463

>>5283794

Ah that makes sense, late to the party poor fag here, bought three hundo this afternoon was watching it slowly fall was confused.

Want to turn a quick flip into some smaller coins, what do you rich warmed-bagel fuckers recommend I pick up once this thing moons?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:13:14 No.5284503 >>5284463 Well since you seem to like scamcoins check out Tether.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:14:20 No.5284534

I'm not sure what to do since I can't access BCH/USD market on GDAX. So far I've just been HODLing my BCH.

I'm planning to sell for BTC and rebuy at a lower ratio, but the normie pump after coinbase enables buys has me worried abpit where to place the buy orders.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:14:32 No.5284544 >>5284503 I dont give a shit about gooks or whatever, I'm in it for ebuxx friendo, should have been doing this ages ago.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:16:34 No.5284600 BCH has been the most guaranteed moon since June.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:18:52 No.5284681 >>5284046 why do retards keep thinking this it's only faster because it's lower volume, the tech is a literal copypasta of btc fucktard

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:19:45 No.5284704 File: 926 KB, 532x560, laugh_anime.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5284681 >the tech is a literal copypasta of btc fucktard

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:20:36 No.5284724 >>5284681 >the tech is a literal copypasta of btc fucktard BCH is even more of a copypasta of BTC than LTC is.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:20:57 No.5284734 this is so dumb, why do I have my money in this when I could be trading real alts instead?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:23:31 No.5284810 >>5284704 other than the mining algo and circulating supply, it is

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:24:01 No.5284824 >>5284503 So salty. Is it because BCH is up 200% this month to BTC's 100%? You ain't seen nothing yet.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:24:02 No.5284825 File: 1.07 MB, 294x216, badgoy!.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5284734 (you) are destined to a be a sheeple goyim so that Jihan Wu can keep a coin around that is highly profitable to mine with the Antbleed vulnerability intact.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:25:09 No.5284863 >actually buying BCH >funding North Korea

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:25:22 No.5284874 People made millions today. Me, I made 32%. Too bad I only had $1500 in.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:26:47 No.5284924
File: 1.12 MB, 500x599, makesmethink.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>5284810
>holy shit it's off by 50 days on the exact same inflation rate and expansion curve
>we have a difficulty adjustment algorithm that pegs us to the profitability of BTC mining
Wow, it's almost as if it's been designed to perfectly mimic BTC except for replacing the vulnerability to Antbleed. If only we had a charismatic loudmouthed moron willing to shill for us 24/7 on every major news network.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:31:53 No.5285092 i just cant fathom how coinbase cant get this shit up and running. like what the fuck are they doing? buys and sells were enabled for a whopping 15 mins today? holy fuck what a joke

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:32:33 No.5285116 >>5284874 I literally bought BCH for 10$k last week when I saw it slowly climbing up. Since I don't sell like a degenerate ADHD moron as soon as it drops 3% I already reaped 150% reward. Easiest money of my life. And the train does not stop yet.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:32:41 No.5285119 It's dropping below 3500 Get ready for them to turn it on after they accumulate

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:34:33 No.5285173 >>5285116 Do you think gdax is going to list bitcoin gold or other forks?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:35:08 No.5285190 >>5285119 it is barely moving however, especially on korean exchanges it sits at 4300$.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:37:45 No.5285276 do you think it will dump after coinbase starts working again?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:37:48 No.5285279 Why the fuck did they turn off trading. Jesus fucking christ. Reeeeeeeeeeeee

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:37:59 No.5285286 You can buy on coinbase again get ready

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:38:58 No.5285313 >>5285190 Everything is inflated on Korean exchanges. Bitcoin is at $19,577.93 on Bithumb.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:40:01 No.5285350 >>5285286 Still saying suspended on https://status.coinbase.com/

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:41:41 No.5285395 >>5277546 Only fools dump for a small profit. Think outside the box.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:42:24 No.5285414 File: 5 KB, 617x147, fuark.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5285350 Must've just been my browser, the yellow warning wasnt there for me a second ago I was ready for the drama, im only holding like $10 worth

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:43:27 No.5285452 >>5285395 where do you think it will head to BCH/BTC in the next 8 hours? I have to put a limit sell order.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:43:55 No.5285471

>>5283903
>Implying they will ever get to test anything

I can hear the normies frantically on their phones with their banks asking where their money yet and why they don't have their Bitcoin Cash, then asking for the Bitcoin Cash hotline to complain, only to realize no such thing exists.

Once their bank transfers go through and they see they've been dumped on, they'll delete Coinbase from their phone and never try Bitcoin or BCash again.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:46:01 No.5285534 >>5285452 It's going to crash hard once it falls below $3,000.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:46:09 No.5285538 >>5282142 >>5282448 Don't worry, we've created a NEW GDAX - GDAX CASH It's exactly the same as GDAX except there are a fraction of people using it right now, so your accounts will be created in seconds! Dump GDAX, get GDAX CASH today!

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:47:47 No.5285599

>>5285276

It will absolutely not dump. For the short time buys were enabled today, it took off hard.

If Coinbase turned on buys right now and left it alone, they would sell out of BCH within the evening. Liquidity is the problem right now, not demand.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:48:42 No.5285637 >>5285599 why did they turn it off?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:49:05 No.5285656 People were buying earlier to get in on the pump and dump because of Roger being on CNBC, even if buys are turned on again it's not gonna shoot up (in fact it's dribbling down, though so is BTC).

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:50:49 No.5285716 File: 21 KB, 651x546, 1452343306927.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5284140 >as expensive as core Nigga what are you smoking? Can i have some of that shit too?

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:51:12 No.5285721

>>5285637

Price was shooting up too fast. Buys were eating through the sell walls in seconds. When it debuted on GDAX last night, it bought through everything all the way up to $9500.

Today it got up to $4400 from $3700 in minutes. I guess they were worried they'd run out again.

So now they're accumulating, letting people deposit.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:52:47 No.5285767 >>5285721 how long ago did they close it? fuck they are scum

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:52:51 No.5285770 >>5284681 Litecoin is double the speed of bitcoin at same volume.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:54:41 No.5285819 >>5277804 Gdax doesn't do bitcoin cash for ether...

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:56:36 No.5285875

>>5285599
I disagree. Even if what you're saying is true, they've only got a short period to do it. It's almost 9:00 PM EST right now. All the boomers will be going to sleep soon. Give it five more hours for the west coast to fall asleep. Once that happens it's game over. Coinbase wont affect anything overnight because the Chinese don't give a fuck about it. Ver's memery can't reach them. They'll most likely dump to capitalize on what was already pumped in by the dumb Laowais. And them the boomers will wake up tomorrow and freak out and sell to cut their losses.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:58:05 No.5285919 >>5285721 >So now they're accumulating, letting people deposit. Pretty sure they just buy off GDAX to fill peoples' orders.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:58:19 No.5285927 >>5278708 It’s up like 7k this month. That’s unprecedented in the finance world. You’re just an impatient shit

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:59:24 No.5285955 >>5285770 I guess I'm the retard then. But how so? How tf does LTC scale better?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 20:59:59 No.5285974 coinbase is trading again

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:00:21 No.5285986 >>5285919 They do. You could watch it happening. The entire history was green. It was glorious. Just huge flashes of green every second until they disabled it.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:02:04 No.5286029 File: 6 KB, 342x225, coinb4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5285974 It isn't. GDAX is trading, and has been all day. When cash buys are turned on coinbase, you will see it take off.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:02:08 No.5286031

I'm usually a lurker but I still don't get this coin, no FUD intended but what /exactly/ does BCash do that doge, lite, feather and the other first gen altcoins do. Even Clams is "faster transactions less fees" compared to bitcoin there's gotta be something else to bitcash right?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:05:07 No.5286102 >>5286031 It was forked from Bitcoin, so if you owned Bitcoin pre-fork, you also have Bitcoin Cash.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:05:46 No.5286128 >>5286031 Nothing special, it's just Bitcoin working as peer to peer electronic cash.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:08:28 No.5286206 >>5286031 Those alts you mention lack the royal blood. BCH is basically the Chad younger brother to decripit, rapidly aging, socially inept perma virgin that is BTC.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:09:37 No.5286248 >>5286031 And it's advantages are expanded further when contrasted with BTC's upcoming roadmap of big banks running the network in a purely centralized manner.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:10:08 No.5286263 coinbase killed the moon mission before it even began. thanks cuckbase.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:10:37 No.5286286 Just a reminder that BCH only goes up when BTC goes down But the good thing is that BTC is in a downtrend

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:10:43 No.5286288 when is the eth/btc flippening coming again?

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:10:48 No.5286290

>>5286102
I'll check my wallets, but uh, Clam also does the "if you owned btc you own clam" thing, it just feels like it's playing by the old rules where you can just clone bitcoin tweak a few numbers and be done and I'm amazed that can still be hyped.

>>5286128
Yeah I mean, it's good that it can be used quicker, is it really intended to kill bitcoin then? Like it's trying to be a fork that takes over what the original project had and improve it? That makes a little more sense now that I think about it.

>>5286206
>>5286248
I guess I see the idea, but then if it's "royal blood" it's trying to sell on isn't that kind of irrelevant because you're basically trying to win the whole "first company in a field wins" thing?

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:11:04 No.5286297

>>5286031
BCH pretty much just did two things: Increase the block size to a max of 8MB and remove the "Replace-by-Fee" feature. The former clears up the transaction backlog, but is a shitty solution because it wont work longterm. They'll have to keep increasing the blocksize until they get to 1 terabyte blocks every ten minutes (seriously) before they can process a similar amount of transactions as Visa. This means that only incredibly wealthy people and big businesses will be able to run full Bitcoin Cash nodes. Removing "Replace-by-Fee" also makes BCH "faster". Replace-by-Fee is what allows you to resend a transaction with a larger fee if you put a low enough fee that it will never complete. It makes things "faster" because it prevents people from double spending (unless someone controls most of the full nodes, as in the 1TB scenario) without waiting for additional confirmations. The problem is that if BCH ever gets saturated to the point that your transaction wont complete without a larger fee you will literally LOSE YOUR MONEY FOREVER in the case of that transaction because you can't resend it.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:11:26 No.5286306 File: 50 KB, 640x360, 20.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5286206 >royal blood >cryptocurrency I wish I could go long cashie delusion.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:18:17 No.5286509 >>5286297 See now that's the explanation I was looking for, thank you anon I see clearer now what they were trying to accomplish and what the risks are.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:18:26 No.5286514 >>5286290 The people who started BCH say they do not intend for it to compete with Bitcoin. They just want peer to peer electronic cash. However pretty much everyone else sees BCH as competing with Bitcoin. I don't support the direct competition.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:19:34 No.5286553 >>5286206 >the royal blood So branding is all anything with Bitcoin in the name has going for it. Slightly less shit garbage is still shit

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:26:01 No.5286759 >>5286306 The royal blood meme is true though, people want "bitcoin", and BCH is a direct fork. >>5286290 As long as it's of royal blood it still has the first mover advantage. >>5286290 Q2 2018 but it will be a BCH / ETH flippening.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:28:56 No.5286852 >>5285955 Litecoin is basically a bitcoin clone with double the size of the blocks. It allows double the speed.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:31:18 No.5286926 >>5286297 >>5286297 Can confirm. Accidentally sent a zero fee, took 4 fucking days to get my BCH.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:33:24 No.5287000

>>5286509
To make matters worse, the only way Bcash can fix the problem they'll have with huge block sizes is to implement something like the Lightning Network, which is what Bitcoin is currently doing. This means that at some point Bcash WILL be deprecated because their transactions will be slower than Lightning, and Lightning will allow Visa levels of transactions without resorting to something ridiculous like 1TB block sizes. Lightning will also allow atomic swaps, which are instant swaps between all coins that support Segwit (e.g. between BTC and LTC). And anyone can run a Lightning node, just like a Bitcoin node. What this means that as soon as Lightning is deployed, nobody will have any use for Bcash anymore. It will be pointless. And both Bitcoin and Litecoin will go to the moon because they'll be easily interchangeable without an exchange.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:36:14 No.5287081 >>5278886 Offchain solutions (i.e. LN) and blocksize fixed at 1 MB are against Satoshi's vision.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:37:13 No.5287115

>>5286926
You're actually lucky there. In the future people will most likely never receive those transactions and their money will just disappear into the void. This is one of the reasons I don't like Ver. Not only is he not a programmer, but he also doesn't understand the reasons Satoshi put some of these things in place. There is a reason for 1MB blocks. It's so you can't fill a huge block with garbage data and flood the network, causing mining nodes to slow down. There's a reason for Replace-by-Fee. It's so people don't lose their fucking money.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:38:47 No.5287166 >>5287081 You should stop trying to interpret a missing/dead man's visions and instead think critically about the problem.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:39:55 No.5287199 >>5286514 So BTC supporters are communists? There's no improvement without competition.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:41:25 No.5287234

>>5286759
Why do people /want/ bitcoin though? Surely every altcoin that does little with the code is a fork, just a fork from earlier, before lots of whales got hold of it. If anything it's probably a point against in my opinion of it, forking in a way to keep the old rich guard in power and potentially double their money just feels like a cynical way to pander to the early bitcoin investers, even though I've been in crypto for years it feels quite unfair to double everyone's money, it fakes all the effort people took to get bitcoin where it was.

>>5287000
>>5287115
Thank you, these posts have been much more insightful than the usual FUD about this coin.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:42:20 No.5287257

>>5286553
Yes, but this is true for Bitcoin too. BCH will work better short term, imo. I know there's the arguement presented here about the effects once blocks get too big: >>5286297, but that's only a problem when and if blocks get this big (and the hardware available at that time may make 1TB blocks peanuts).

BTC on the other doesn't really work well at all currently, so I'm hedging my bets on BCH short term, and will reevaluate as LN nears, though it does seem a rather centralized solution. If hardware keeps pace with BCH's blocks, we may never see the problems that the referenced anon pointed out.

Basically, BTC has problems TODAY, RIGHT NOW, where as BCH does not.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:43:54 No.5287293

>>5287000
That's the ideal situation but the reality is that LN is nowhere close to being possible due to various issues and has a high risk of having to rely on centralized solutions because of those issues.

>There is a reason for 1MB blocks. It's so you can't fill a huge block with garbage data and flood the network
Wow. It's easier to flood the network in fashion with 1MB blocks.

Satoshi talked about how block size should be increased to meet demand.
>Interpret a missing man's vision
He specifically spelled it out, no need for interpretation.

>>5287199
>this car company feels like it doesn't need to compete with this truck company? They're communists lol
BTC and BCH do different things.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:45:09 No.5287357 any chance of BCC buying enabled on coinbase tonight? or think they stop work at 5pm?

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:45:44 No.5287375

>>5287234
Every altcoin is not a fork. Just because they incorporate similar ideas does not make it a fork. A real fork is when BTC decides against something, so a some people go do the thing they decided against (in BCH's case, bigger blocks).

I don't /want/ Bitcoin though, I want reasonable tech that I can actually use to buy coffee casually like ByteBall, anonymous tech like Monero, and sensible platforms like ETH (ByteBall is also a smart contract platform, but less stress tested and battle hardened).

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:45:59 No.5287380

>>5286514
The problem is that switching between coins is a pain in the ass currently. It requires an intermediary exchange, will likely take a long time, and will also cost you money to do so in fees. So people try to focus on one coin as being the dominant coin that everyone uses, with all the others being competition. The Lightning Network will mostly solve this for SegWit coins. Bitcoin and Litecoin wont be competing with eachother anymore because you'll be able to swap them instantly with zero fees. Bcash on the other hand will still require fees for transactions and an exchange to swap coins because it's incompatible with Lightning.

>>5287234
>Why do people /want/ bitcoin though?
Marketing, mostly. Litecoin has been faster than Bitcoin for a very long time because it generates blocks every 2.5 minutes instead of every 10. That's why you get confirmations in a fraction of the time. But people still used Bitcoin because it's what they had heard of and is what is popular. There are definitely altcoins that are technically better.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:47:12 No.5287415 >>5286852 that's silly lol. No one shits on LTC for doing this but BCH gets all the hate?

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:48:13 No.5287445

>>5287257
This is the biggest point. Why the fuck would you deliberately inhibit yourself today because your solution (which works amazingly today) might not scale out in 5-10 years? Implement the obvious fix today, then work on other solutions (like LN)

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:49:16 No.5287482 >>5287415 LTC is not a threat because Charlie Lee is a blockstream cuckold. that dude literally sold all his LTC because he's a pussy.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:50:58 No.5287527

>>5287293
>Satoshi talked about how block size should be increased to meet demand.

Have you read the white paper? Where in the fuck does it even mention block size, let alone increasing it? The white paper is very limited in regards to implementation details you mug.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:52:57 No.5287593 >>5287527 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1347.msg15366#msg15366

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:54:09 No.5287628

>>5287257
>BTC on the other doesn't really work well at all currently
Some of us are angry about this because it was a coordinated effort to make Bitcoin "not work". SegWit is a viable solution. It is already implemented. But people like Ver convinced others it was bad because they wanted to fork Bitcoin and take control. The fact of the matter is, there are only about 5-6 transactions per second happening with Bitcoin currently. SegWit gives it the capacity for 11 transactions per second, so it would have room to double in size before it was limited again. In the meantime, Lightning will be released and solve the issues of transaction speed (instant transactions), privacy (transactions aren't on the blockchain and are private), cost (no transaction fees), and competition (atomic swaps between SegWit coins). SegWit is REQUIRED for this to work. And Ver is trying to prevent SegWit from happening. Coinbase STILL hasn't implemented it. They could easily. The three man team at the literally who service coinmall.com implemented SegWit in ONE DAY. It's intentional on Coinbase and any other exchange that hasn't implemented it, entirely for political purposes.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:54:29 No.5287635

>>5287445
>the fuck would you deliberately inhibit yourself today because your solution (which works amazingly today) might not scale out in 5-10 years? Implement the obvious

Probably because we are not crybaby manlets that want to insure long term decentralization and scaling.

If people actually gave a fuck about spending crypto right now you would see full blocks on alts. You don't. Heck nobody is even using bcash shit is 90% empty. So we are going to hurt the key principle of bitcoin (decentralised) in order to allow people to pay for stuff... when they don't pay for stuff, and nobody accepts the payment method...

ib4 "but they would", they didn't before, they don't with other alts, you can shoulda coulda woulda all day, but you are doing it based on emotion.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:54:48 No.5287643

>>5287445
>Implement the obvious fix today, then work on other solutions (like LN)

I mean I guess their answer is "muh idealogy" (since 1TB blocks would be very centralized in 2017), but still I completely agree and they fucked up pretty badly by not being pragmatic and instead idealistic imo. Especially because block size has remained unchanged since 2009, while hardware performance has accelerated according as predicted by Moore's Law (or whatever the fuck).

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:55:42 No.5287668 I appreciate all the tech talk but please give it to me straight. Will this go to 4k by tomorrow. I need to dump these fucking bags already holy shit

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:57:19 No.5287709 >>5287668 my meme lines show a triangle aka incoming bull run

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:57:24 No.5287713 >>5287668 Yes, but it will go to 100k by Christmas so just hold all your BCH; anyone who says otherwise is a disgusting corecuck and you should pay zero heed to their opinion.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 21:58:40 No.5287754 >>5287593 >https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1347.msg15366#msg15366 >not white paper >literally just says you can do it >thinking even if you found a quote of him saying "we should do it" that the apeal to authority justifies it

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:00:00 No.5287790

>>5287482
I know it's not a threat, just hypocritical of the community.

>>5287628
>a coordinated effort to make Bitcoin "not work"
Being king is going to be competitive. It's kill or be killed, and if it can't defend itself it has every reason to die. Try spamming BCH if/when it's top dawg and see how that goes. The spamming is really a glimpse of how it will perform under higher regular load, which it should be ready for anyway if it's truly the best contestant.

There's a lot of claims in that aren't true, but I'm not even going to bother going into it as it ultimately doesn't matter, since the main concern is what I typed above.

>>5287635
Well, it should at least WORK short term, even if bigger blocks were used as a temporary crutch to keep things flowing unit LN, that'd be leagues better and BCH wouldn't be threatening BTC atm.

And people don't pay for stuff because they can't really, adoption is too low.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:01:36 No.5287828

>>5287415
First off, the other anon is wrong. Litecoin has a blocksize limit of 1MB just like Bitcoin. It also support SegWit like Bitcoin, which ups that to 1.7MB. Litecoin does make blocks quicker though. It makes a new block every 2.5 minutes instead of every 10 minutes like Bitcoin. That's what makes it faster. But that's not why Litecoin was created. It was created around the time ASIC miners were being developed for Bitcoin. Litecoin uses scrypt instead of SHA-256. Scrypt is much more difficult to implement in an ASIC. This allowed people to still use their old mining rigs for a while, until new ASICs were developed for Litecoin. So to make a long story short, people don't shit on Litecoin because it was created to suit a purpose instead of to be disruptive. I wouldn't mind Bcash at all if SegWit didn't exist.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:01:48 No.5287832 File: 266 KB, 869x773, fees.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Cashies cannot refute pic related.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:03:44 No.5287890 >>5287790 To be fair good sir I actually agree. I am not against a 2mb increase on bitcoin. If they came out with a 2mb increase for Jan I'd probably vote yes, if anything to kill off this BCH vs BTC toxic death.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:03:58 No.5287901 >>5287828 do you have a discord or anywhere besides here to talk to you? You're very knowledgeable

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:05:34 No.5287942

>>5287790
>Being king is going to be competitive. It's kill or be killed, and if it can't defend itself it has every reason to die.
I'm aware. I'm also not too concerned. I fully expect the Lightning Network to be the next big step in cryptocurrency adoption and since Bcash is incompatible with it, it's going to lose there.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:06:12 No.5287962 >>5287901 Nope. Most of the time I just shitpost on /a/.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:07:17 No.5287989 >>5287962 mind me asking what your blockfolio looks like?

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:07:22 No.5287992

>>5287832
Just get a bigger boat, nigger. It doesn't increase centralization since the increase is so miniscule and the hardware is so much better than in 2009. Then you have none of the problems listed in the 2-3 paragraphs.

This whole screenshot is retarded. Yeah, people are competing for blockspace, so, bazgina nigger, just make bigger blocks.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:07:43 No.5288005

>>5287754
Moving the goalposts.

For me it's simple. Bitcoin Cash fills a certain need (peer to peer electronic cash) that Bitcoin used to fill originally but doesn't anymore. I don't have a political attachment to it, I use it because it works. If Bitcoin implements a decentralized scaling solution at some point then great, I'll use whichever is better.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:07:51 No.5288010

Market recommendations?

Sorry for the noob post, but someone on here was mentioning earlier today that there are really only 2 markets that are needed to purchase coin (not coinbase, gdax or binance)

This is a fully retarded post, but i think one of them started with a P?

I would like to purchase a few different coins below a dollar, any help is appreciated.

Thanks

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:08:29 No.5288020 >>5287832 LN transactions still need to be settled on chain. So even with LN, we will need a blocksize increase.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:09:13 No.5288038 >>5287828 Ok, so I was right after all, beyond the "new block after every 2.5 minutes". I knew LTC was originally intended as ASIC resistant, but that changed.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:09:16 No.5288039 >>5287942 This. If you want hard evidence of the difference between the communities, look at the hard code. The Bitcoin Core and LN Githubs have new files and commits almost every day, the cashie githubs had their last update 1-2 months ago.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:11:07 No.5288093 can't kill the kill gg cashies get fucked

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:11:58 No.5288131

>>5288010
Poloneix? Hard to decipher what you're trying to ask though.

CoinBase and Gemini are both FIAT off ramps (as in LocalBitcoin, LocalMonero, etc.. But those require meeting in person).

GDAX, Binance, Bittrex and Poloneix are all BTC and alt coin exchanges, but you can't pay with FIAT.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:12:09 No.5288135 >>5288093 can't kill the king* fuck

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:13:01 No.5288161

>>5287992
>miners supply blockspace
>people are competing for blockspace
>increase the size of the block nigger
>this doesn't fuck over the miners
Ok Roger, what happens when you want 0 fees but all 21 million Bitcoin Cash coins are mined? How are you going to pay the miners without fees and block rewards? Oh, you'll just have to hardfork, which isn't a problem at this time since BCH hardforks regularly to increase the block cap, and remove the hard cap of 21 million so that there will always be block rewards for miners, aka Jihan. And now you know why bcash will either face the exact same fee problems as BTC or will give up on being deflationary. Don't believe me, look what they did to dogecoin when fees started getting high - they removed the hard cap on how many dogecoin could ever exist and it became the most inflationary crypto in history.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:15:06 No.5288214

>>5279965
roger is that you lmao
BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:16:22 No.5288260 >>5279901 Lol this idiot believes richard heart is a bitcoin developer LOL Cashiecuck verpuppet BTFO

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:16:33 No.5288267

>>5288020
I'm not opposed to blocksize increases, I'm opposed to saying "fuck the consensus hard fork now" like bcash did - if bcash didn't exist and Jihan and Roger decided to get along instead of being autistic dickheads we probably would have seen segwit2x adopted, making the blocks 2MB and implementing segwit, effectively making the blocks worth 4-8MB size and reducing fees substantially. Instead, Jihan and Roger and co. saw a divisive political wedge they could drive, capitalized on it, and now bcash parades as "satoshi's vision" when all it amounts to is a way for Jihan to ensure his antbleed vulnerability persists on a major blockchain that potentially will never cease to have block rewards, making him and his miners the new central bank of bcash.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:18:36 No.5288335

>>5279901
guess what roger?
BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:20:19 No.5288399 >>5288039 >hard evidence this isn't true at all though

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:22:15 No.5288458 >>5288161 I don't like BCH but this is not a real argument since it will happen when we're all dead

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:22:23 No.5288461 >>5288161 > all 21 million Bitcoin Cash coins are mined When is that scheduled to happen? Like 2140? This is the problem with core, they are looking way too far into the future and not at today or tomorrow.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:24:03 No.5288515 >>5288267 >big banky got his toy, but so did the other boys! big banky vewwy mad! its mine! its not faiw!

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:24:11 No.5288518

>>5288010
BitFlyer is very, very good. It's the only exchange that I'm aware of that support advanced trading methods like trailing stops, IFD, OCO, and IFDOCO. The downside being that it currently only supports BTC. Gemini and itBit are the only other ones I'd use when dealing with Fiat

Cryptopia is also very nice. It supports a wide range of altcoins. Same with Binance.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:24:46 No.5288533

>>5288399
https://github.com/ACINQ/eclair
>9 hours ago
https://github.com/BitcoinUnlimited/BitcoinUnlimited
>1 month ago

How much harder evidence do you need to see the difference between smoke and mirrors and hard code? Should I start highlighting differences between OG bitcoin source code and BCH source code before you acknowledge it's a fork with no developer support?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:26:34 No.5288581 >>5288267 Why do you think BCH's entire market cap is owned by Jihan and Rodger? There are very clear technical merits, stop falling for the BTC-core boogeymans. Not everyone that holds BTC is a saint, believe it or not.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:27:43 No.5288625

>>5288461
>>5288458
>all 21 million are mined in 2140 so it doesn't matter
Yeah, 99.8% or so are mined by the end of 2025. It matters TODAY because when I buy a miner TODAY I expect to keep it online for ~5 years at least, 10 years ideally, which would be 2027. Having hardforks fuck up the reward schedule and my expected earnings is not encouraging, and bcash literally gave miners the bird when it said "we'll just increase the block size if fees get high."

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:28:02 No.5288633 >>5288533 But anon, that's only one of the 5+ or so githubs for BCH.

>>	wang dong Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:28:10 No.5288639 >>5285819 sell it for dollars then buy eth you absolute brainlet

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:29:20 No.5288675 File: 58 KB, 500x500, smi2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5288533 >BitcoinUnlimited

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:30:51 No.5288712

>>5288581
>there are clear technical merits
Like what? Name one.

>>5288633
>hurr it's one of 5
If you're accusing me of cherry picking, I did. The Bitcoin ABC github had its last update 19 days ago, not 1 month ago. If you're saying there are so many githubs and PhD software devs and people working on it - prove it. Those people have to eat, so either someone is paying them to develop on bcash or they don't exist. Cashies like to complain about Blockstream which is one of 3 lightning dev companies, where are the bcash dev companies?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:31:53 No.5288746 >>5288675 https://github.com/Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc My bad it was 16 days.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:34:16 No.5288826 File: 171 KB, 374x347, 1513373615684.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5288131 >GDAX

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:36:52 No.5288902

>>5288712
>name one
Faster transactions and cheaper fees, duh. Also, keeping things onchain aids in keeping the network decentralized, unlike relying on Bank of Blockstream as your solution.

>1 of 5
Yes, cherry picking. Also >>5288746, as you noticed. I didn't say anything about PhDs working on it, but I'd expect there's plenty.

>my arguement is falling apart so I'll ask this anon to prove things he didn't even claim
Yeah, not really interested.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:38:53 No.5288970 >>5288826 I know, I fucked it all up anon.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:42:52 No.5289106

>>5288902
>Also, keeping things onchain aids in keeping the network decentralized
I don't really understand this issue because the Lightning Network is optional. Most people will use it because it has a ton of advantages (e.g. private transactions) but you don't have to if you don't want to. Because most people are using it you will still get the benefits of less congestion.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:45:43 No.5289210

>>5289106
Perhaps it's more idealogical than anything. It's just a move in the wrong direction IMHO.

Like why the Free Software Foundation won't endorse Debian because it has a nonfree version, I won't endorse BTC because it has a centralized option. I know this doesn't matter and it's not a reasonable arguement, but crypto was always intended to be decentralized and it just rustles my freetard jimmies.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:47:10 No.5289255

>>5289210
Do you not use cryptocurrency exchanges? Because those are far, far more centralized than Lightning. If anything, the atomic swap capability of Lightning is a push towards decentralization because you don't need to trust a central exchange with your money to perform a swap.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:54:42 No.5289545

>>5289255
I do, but this doesn't have anything to do with the crypto technology. I'd use a decentralized exchange in a heartbeat if there was a good one available.

I draw a fine line between my idealogy and my investing too, ofc. LN is not the only way toward a decentralized exchange though, for the record. So to call a push toward decentralization for that reason is a bit of a stretch.

Anonymous Wed, Dec 20, 2017 22:59:32 No.5289714

>>5289545
Lightning may not be the only method of decentralizing an exchange, but it also solves a lot of problems along with it. Private transactions are a big one for me. I don't like that my transactions are permanently traceable on the blockchain. So in the end, I think Lightning is the best method that has been proposed thus far. And since it's entirely optional, we can always use something else if it arises. Either way, I'd say it's a huge improvement over trusting an exchange. If you think otherwise, well, go tell that to one of the people that killed themselves over MtGox.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance