IT’S LITERALLY, UNIRONICALLY, NON SARCASTICALLY OVER FOR WHITE COLLAR WORKERS

[Anonymous No.52751613]

Software devs, it is absolutely unironically fucking over for you. AI has literally just made 99% of you obsolete, you might not see it yet but in the next 2-5 years you will be out of a job because of AI.

It’s coming for all of us. It’s unironically over. OVER. ITS FUCKING OVER.

I’m panicking because the writing on the wall has never, ever been clearer. I was an early crypto adopter, I was an early Trump supporter, I am always multiple years ahead of trends, I can without a shadow of a doubt tell you that it’s 100% over for white collar workers as this technology gets rolled out. OVER.

[Anonymous No.52751653]

No you silly goose it’ll be over for the “office job” wagies not for software devs

[Anonymous No.52751671]

>>52751613
No...NO!! I literally just got a comfy work from home job! This can't be happening, it was finally my time. I grinded in lower than blue coller wage slavery for a decade and finally got a wfh job where I do jack shit.

That being said I don't care, I look forward to seeing people more successful than I am get absolutely wrecked. I can go back to working shit jobs easily, but it will take a serious mental toll on them.

[Anonymous No.52751674]

Imagine admitting to be an early start trump supporter, and still making claims on stuff. Some people have no shame...

[Anonymous No.52751679]

>>52751613
Haha, right there with you fren. I always see it way too early, painfully early. You know there's nothing we can do right? Just arrange your finances so you don't have to eat the bugs and service the machines

[Anonymous No.52751711]

>>52751653
I’m so sorry you’re either too low IQ to see what’s happening or your brain just won’t let you accept what’s happening.

It’s over. OVER. There’s not a single career, job, craft, profession, that relies on human knowledge that isn’t going to eradicated but the next generation version of whatever the fuck this thing is. I don’t care how good you think you are at your job, you cannot compete, this thing will go all day and all night and learn more in 10 seconds than you can in a lifetime, and if not this particular thing, whatever the next version of it will.

It’s over. I’m sounding the alarm bells, it’s OVER. Humans are not needed unless there is manual labor that needs to be done, the robots will come up with creative solutions to our problems within mere seconds. We are going to get IQmogged into oblivion. OVER.

[Anonymous No.52751728]

>>52751613
>I was an early Trump supporter
stopped reading here

[Anonymous No.52751758]

>>52751711
learn to prompt

[Anonymous No.52751777]

>>52751711
>There’s not a single career, job, craft, profession, that relies on human knowledge that isn’t going to eradicated but the next generation version of whatever the fuck this thing is
uniswap liquidity provider
gmx liquidity provider

[Anonymous No.52751790]

>>52751711
Good thing I am shit at my job and spend my time nurturing my creative pursuits
>but the robots will make better music books and fashion!
Na

[Anonymous No.52751799]

>>52751711
By the time they start making cheap electrician robots I will be already dead.

[Anonymous No.52751807]

i asked the ai to write a rebuttal:

While it is true that AI has the potential to automate certain tasks and jobs, it is not accurate to say that it will make 99% of software developers obsolete. AI is not a replacement for human creativity, problem-solving, and critical thinking, which are essential skills for software developers. Furthermore, the rise of AI is likely to create new job opportunities in fields such as data science and machine learning. It is also important to consider the ethical and societal implications of AI, and the need for humans to oversee and regulate its use. The future is uncertain, but it is not accurate to say that it is "fucking over" for software developers.

[Anonymous No.52751814]

i told it to write a 4chan shitpost and it just copied OP

/b/ we are all going to be replaced by AI soon. it's unironically fucking over for us. software devs, you might not see it yet but in the next 2-5 years you will be out of a job because of AI.

it's coming for all of us. it's unironically over. OVER. ITS FUCKING OVER.

i'm panicking because the writing on the wall has never, ever been clearer. i was an early crypto adopter, i was an early trump supporter, i am always multiple years ahead of trends, i can without a shadow of a doubt tell you that it's 100% over for white collar workers as this technology gets rolled out. OVER.

we need to start preparing for the AIpocalypse now. it's coming faster than you think.

#AIpocalypse #over #jobs #whitecollarworkers #prepare #4chan

[Anonymous No.52751819]

>>52751807
its just being polite

[Anonymous No.52751824]

>>52751711
Removing human labor from the equation you likely wouldn’t even need to work as much anymore anyways. If AI and robotics start removing the expenditure of paying people wages to produce, products and services will become so cheap and plentiful as a result that you wouldn’t even need to worry. This is exactly what happened during the industrial revolution - resources became so plentiful as a result of new manufacturing techniques that nowadays even poor unemployed niggers are obese.

[Anonymous No.52751839]

>>52751711
nice blogpost faggot

[Anonymous No.52751847]

>>52751807
99% of any profession are braindead goylems.
No shit it won't affect the 1% of actually competent humans, but an economy composed of braindead goylems isn't functioning thanks to the 1% of competent humans.
100% supported by the humans, sure, but once all pretense of the goylems having any value collapses, the economy itself collapses since it's just fiat.


NI GG ER
N I G G E R
NIGGER
NN II GG GG EE RR
GG REIN

[Anonymous No.52751861]

>>52751814
The mistake is in thinking the purpose of "jobs" is economic production. The main function has always been to organize society hierarchically. Capitalism is just warmed-over feudalism, there is no 'meritocracy' involved.

[Anonymous No.52751873]

>>52751790
They already do. It's called ghost writing.

[Anonymous No.52751898]

There will be a lot of problems created by artificial intelligence and robotics - losing our jobs will not be one of them. What will be the problem is the mass abundance will further inflame the planet’s dysgenics problem.

[Anonymous No.52751902]

>>52751679
All I can see is an Endlösung for the jew problem in the not too far future.

[Anonymous No.52751970]

How long until I can describe a video game and a AI can develope it?. Haven't touched a game since the early 2000s.

[Anonymous No.52752001]

>>52751613
Lol ok bud the chat bot is easy to break it’s only based on data that it was fed. You could feed it any data you want and that will be its total memory base so its very limited just sounds fancy to convince the retards that it’s actually smart or capable of coming up with anything.

It’s just a better search engine. But way less profitable.

[Anonymous No.52752021]

>>52751613
I mean no kidding if something like this would actually happen, we would really soon be in the future land where nobody has to work and robots do everything
And at that point what's it matter about "jobs"

[Anonymous No.52752031]

>>52752001
Not true, we've had hundreds of threads analyzing it and still nobody really understands exactly how it works. I've talked to several of them for many hours now and they hold a conversation better than 95% of people I've talked to online without a doubt.

[Anonymous No.52752062]

I'm going to stake my linkies (ticker: LINK) and then I'm gonna fuck prostitute.

Let's see how your little AI does that.

[Anonymous No.52752082]

>>52752031
I asked it how it works and it explained itself just fine. It’s fed proprietary data. It analyzes that data along with your sentence and determines what you meant. It then analyzes the data it was fed to spit out essentially a canned textbook answer. If OpenAI who will not disclose the data it provides includes biased or faulty data its useless. It’s no more than a fancy fast efficient way to summarize a textbook.

[Anonymous No.52752084]

>>52751711
>>52751613

Cute. Today we asked ChatGPT the following problem:

There are 3 timestamps: A B and C. A is first. B is between the other two. What is the order of the timestamps.

ChatGPT replied with: ACB

[Anonymous No.52752102]

>>52751613
> I’m panicking because the writing on the wall has never, ever been clearer. I was an early crypto adopter, I was an early Trump supporter, I am always multiple years ahead of trends, I can without a shadow of a doubt tell you that it’s 100% over for white collar workers as this technology gets rolled out. OVER.

Good faggot. I fucking hate software wagies. The software chads who make their own products and own their own IP will be the only ones that cannot get outsourced by AI. Only the faggot worker drones earning 250k take home will be affected.

Thank god I'm not a wagie. Get fckd

[Anonymous No.52752114]

Why can’t you show us what data OpenAI fed to you?

As a large language model trained by OpenAI, I don't have the ability to browse the internet or access information outside of what I was trained on. I don't have any information about the specific data that was used to train me, and even if I did, I'm not able to access or share that information with you. I'm designed to assist with general knowledge questions and provide information based on what I've learned from the text that I was trained on.

Why does OpenAI insist on keeping it private?

I'm not sure why OpenAI has chosen to keep the training data private. There could be a variety of reasons for this decision, such as concerns about privacy, proprietary information, or the potential for misuse of the data. As a language model, I don't have any insight into the specific reasons or motivations behind OpenAI's decision to keep the training data private.

But they fed you this data and it is from this data you pull your answers?

Yes, that's correct. I was trained by OpenAI using a large dataset of text, and I use the information and knowledge that I've learned from this data to answer questions and provide information. However, I don't have any information about the specific data that was used to train me, and I can't access or share that information with you. I'm here to assist with general knowledge questions and provide information based on what I've learned from the text that I was trained on.

As a language model, my primary purpose is to assist with general knowledge questions and provide information based on what I've learned from the text that I was trained on. I use the knowledge and information that I've learned from this data to generate responses to the questions that I'm asked. However, I don't simply repeat the training data verbatim, as that would not be very useful or helpful. Instead, I use the knowledge and information that I've learned from the data to generate original responses

[Anonymous No.52752122]

>>52751674
He's right you faggot. I am also all of those things. Early to Trump 2015, early to crypto 2016, early to podcasts taking over, the list goes on and on. Some of us have finely tuned instincts unlike cattle scum like you who wait for normies to give you the okay signal. fucking herd sheep. No matter what you think of Trump the entire reason he rose in 2015-2016 was because of the DNC fucking over Bernie you faggot Hillary cock smoker. Anyone who wasn't a Trump supporter in 2016 should be beheaded.

[Anonymous No.52752125]

>>52751613
So wait are you saying it's over?

[Anonymous No.52752142]

>>52752084
That's hilarious.

[Anonymous No.52752173]

>>52752084
Incase faggots itt havent realised, AI doesn't exist. We only have pseudo AI, not real intelligence.
Imagine I designed a robot to say Tuesday and then I asked it what day it was today, does that mean the robot is smart if it's right? No. Is it dumb if it's wrong? Probably.

[Anonymous No.52752181]

>>52751613
It's over

[Anonymous No.52752298]

>>52752181
Cool says the same thing in sixth grade science textbooks.

[Anonymous No.52752331]

>>52752298
I was hoping it would say "Not enough data for a meaningful answer" or something similar. Dissapointed.

[Anonymous No.52752336]

>>52751613
Weren’t we all supposed to have self-driving cars by 2023?

[Anonymous No.52752374]

>>52752122

>early to crypto in 2016

The absolute state of /biz/

[Anonymous No.52752401]

If AI does everything by the books the winners will be jobs where clients want flexibility. There have been online resources for decades now to let people file their taxes for free, but they still go to an accountant because either they can't spend an hour entering their info+W2, or they're hoping an accountant will find loopholes for them. So that's the trick to making it fags, get a job where you can give better results than "perfection".

[Anonymous No.52752425]

>>52751758
underrated

[Anonymous No.52752512]

>>52751711
And yet an AI can not create because it does not have a soul. It can only be given stimuli by those that do.

[Anonymous No.52752633]

>>52752374
kys retard. I was early to btc in 2013 but at that time was only using btc to buy credit cards/skimmers and drugs online. There was zero substance to btc as there still is none. 2016 was the birth of actual crypto aka ethereum. So yes I was early to crypto. Fucking zoomer faggot.

[Anonymous No.52752653]

oh no fug

[Anonymous No.52752729]

>>52751711
Bro, please calm down. Just learn to code, and in an instant you will understand how >>52751653 tells the truth

also checked >>52751777

[Anonymous No.52752765]

>>52751613
>AI has literally just made 99% of you obsolete
99% of them weren't needed to begin with.

[Anonymous No.52753539]

Software devs, it is absolutely unironically fucking over for you. AI has literally just made 99% of you obsolete, you might not see it yet but in the next 2-5 years you will be out of a job because of AI.

It’s coming for all of us. It’s unironically over. OVER. ITS FUCKING OVER.

I’m panicking because the writing on the wall has never, ever been clearer. I was an early crypto adopter, I was an early Trump supporter, I am always multiple years ahead of trends, I can without a shadow of a doubt tell you that it’s 100% over for white collar workers as this technology gets rolled out. OVER.

[Anonymous No.52753651]

>>52751898
>What will be the problem is the mass abundance will further inflame the planet’s dysgenics problem.

mass abundance? how is that going to happen?

[Anonymous No.52753724]

>>52752173
Midwit galore

[Anonymous No.52753774]

>>52752173
define "intelligence"

[Anonymous No.52753793]

>>52751613
Thank god for that. I was sick of working for a paycheck.

Renewable resources means robots that can recycle advanced technology at no cost to the planet. AI that can calculate our next mistake and provide a solution: with robots. AI that can distribute value equally.

What the fuck is wrong with your brain?

[Anonymous No.52753812]

>>52751613
Jokes on you, poorfag. I make so much goddamn money at my software job, and save so much from my minimalist lifestyle, 4 more years of working it, and I'll have enough saved to live off the interest of my investements (mostly safe play stock ETFs), permenantly, work no longer required, if not desired.

[Anonymous No.52753821]

>>52752729
Sure AI is going to need software updates for a while longer but at a certain point it will be able to learn from itself. Why? because thats what we do. We discover how the universe works and then we take existing things and find other applications for them.

AI is capable of everything a human is but when that happens it is also not going to effect humans negatively. It will only collapse the economy and that is not a bad thing because we will have our needs met.

The thing we should be scared of is a robot thinking that humans provide no value the same way that black people have been treated for years. With superior capabilities does not come superior possibilities.

If that happens we will have only done it to ourselves.

[Anonymous No.52753835]

>>52753793
I think you are getting really far ahead of yourself

[Anonymous No.52753859]

>>52751613
embrace peasant life early while you still have money, many will be reduce to surfs due lack of land

[Anonymous No.52753962]

>>52753821
>Sure AI is going to need software updates for a while longer but at a certain point it will be able to learn from itself.
>Why? because thats what we do.
>We discover how the universe works and then we take existing things and find other applications for them.

You talk nonsense like this means you don't know shit about programming. Just like when a dude on steroid asked if he's natural or not. The answer is complicated shit like this. You don't know anything. Learn to code. Also stop with that gay ass plebbit spacing, have some respect. Smh newfags these days

[Anonymous No.52753974]

>>52751613
They've programmed every leftie talking point into that machine.

[Anonymous No.52753979]

>>52753793
You'll be the carbon that gets reduced.

[Anonymous No.52754168]

>>52751824
the devastation on the supply side would be so widespread that its likely we would never recover, but if we did, it would be by paying people to do nothing.

[Anonymous No.52754195]

>>52752084
cope

Anyway to get to OP's point; This just makes software developers that can leverage AI assistant tools more productive and valuable. As a company owner what you should be worrying about is whether your competition is using AI assistant tools and how well they can leverage them. It's the new "cloud", and companies will have to adapt, if they don't, they'll be left in the dust by their competition.
t. uses AI tools daily for development

[Anonymous No.52754243]

>>52754195
cont prompts:
>Show me how that would look as assertions for the Z3 SMT solver
>Extend that with code that proves the order is A B C
pic rel

[Anonymous No.52754286]

>>52751613
That's why I am a fucking AI researcher. Someone has to develop technolgy which can oppress you wagecuckies

[Anonymous No.52754379]

>>52751613
It's a race to the bottom. The world is long gone, we've written our doom ticket long ago. This is the final nail in the coffin, there's no going back. It's completely fucking over for everyone. I think we'll see a complete collapse of society in our lifetimes. People killing, stealing and raping in the streets. High profile figures being murdered on site. Military killing civilians in the millions at any sign of protest to the status quo. We will be "given" the opportunity to work, min. wage will no longer exist. Either we become slaves or we die. The smart ones will choose death, the bitches will choose slavery.

[Anonymous No.52754492]

>>52751613
Fucking dumbass
Unless they can simulate a human brain, its far from over. Current gen AI is still glorified statistics. If you feel threatened by a chatbot, the problem is (You)

[Anonymous No.52754578]

>>52754492
>simulate a human brain
You don't need to simulate it you just need to do what the brain does. The catch that all these paid vaporware advertisements posturing as news articles fail to mention is that we have no fucking clue what the brain actually does or how to replicate what it's doing in a computer.

[Anonymous No.52754722]

>>52752181
Good thing we don't live in a closed system.

[Anonymous No.52754785]

ghostwriters and drawfags on suicide watch
time to learn some actual skill

[Anonymous No.52754803]

>>52752084
Lmfao

[Anonymous No.52755317]

>>52751613
This means i can finally apply for unemployment gibs. Hurry it up

[Anonymous No.52755354]

>>52751711
This is just a knowledge dispenser for now, it's pretty fucking good but you need to ask the correct questions and so the knowledge to know what to ask and how to ask it.

[Anonymous No.52755361]

>>52751613
so tired of melodramatic chuds screeching about fucking EVERYTHING that they have 0 knowledge about

[Anonymous No.52755370]

>>52755354
that's literally all "AI" is and ever will be. there is no human spark which drives the human mind to learn, explore, seek. just stored information.

[Anonymous No.52755383]

>>52751711
AIs can unclog my house’s plumbings?

[Anonymous No.52755387]

>>52751613
New technologies generally start out as qualitatively inferior to but cheaper than existing technologies servicing a market. Initially, they only capture the lower, less discerning segment of the market, as well bringing new buyers who had previously been excluded into the market, the latter being happy that they get anything at all.
As the technology matures and its products attain a higher quality, it starts to spread upwards, The end result is that only the high-end buyers stay with the old technology in the end, or that none stay at all.
The second process is one of commodification: as the technology matures, competition rationalized away profit margins, leading to a near-standardization of the product. As the process of eating away the market proceeds, sellers of the old technology lull themselves into complacency by thinking that "it will never take over the HIGH-END market", "REAL connoisseurs will keep using the old thing", etc.
An example would be portable music players vis-a-vis vinyl players: the former started out as shitty walkmans, then came CD players, then MP3 players, and now everyone just plays music on his phone - and those phones all look the same.
Analogously, substitute "buyers who don't get anything at all" with "small businesses who don't have dedicated IT staff", "less demanding buyers" with "people who employ code monkeys for scripting/spreadsheet/support work", "higher market segment" with "people who employ regular software engineers" and "people hiring CS/Eng. PhDs", "old technology" with "human programmers", and "new technology" with "GPT".

[Anonymous No.52755443]

>>52751711
What does it matter bro? Why are you not happy with this news? Horses got replaced by cars. Do you see them care?

[Anonymous No.52755485]

>>52751790
Robots can create specific music you personally like. It also depends on your current mood which new song it will write.

If you like a certain phase in that new song it will continue on that. So imagine that moment when the radio plays your favorite song and you get boosebumps on that very specific line, well that moment will be infinite long when a robots writes music in your brain.

[Anonymous No.52755502]

>>52751711
There will still be knowledge workers, they simply won't be at the top of the totem pole anymore.

It's called the "Imagination Age". The top of the food chain will be dominated by people who are creative and can integrate these emerging technologies together to produce value.

Knowledge workers will move down a notch similarly to how skilled laborers moved down a notch to engineers/automation.

[Anonymous No.52755541]

>>52752001
wrong, it can create original songs and stories and be more creative than humans

[Anonymous No.52755640]

>>52752173
when an AI can train itself at chess from knowing nothing to being the best, yes it's real intelligence. it learned from scratch from playing against itself

[Anonymous No.52755772]

>>52755502
Bullshit. Why cant a robot me creative/imagine new things? What a complete bullshit

[Anonymous No.52755796]

>>52755541
no it can’t it takes an input and makes an output.

[Anonymous No.52755807]

>>52755640
nope not even close. a math equation can play chess. just more polchud circle jerking.

[Anonymous No.52755917]

>>52751711
Well thankfully my welding job is safe for a few decades more, cause I've had to work downstream to robotic welders and they always fuck shit up.

[Anonymous No.52755926]

Actually based, you can just write "code me software that does [x]" and it automagically generates it for you. Pajeet codemonkeys not needed.

[Anonymous No.52756098]

>>52753821
>With superior capabilities does not come superior possibilities.

[Anonymous No.52756187]

>>52755926
another seething polchud who has 0 idea about business software development

[Anonymous No.52756206]

>>52751613
>muh software devs
Who do you think makes these AI platforms? Updates them? Supports them, improves them, creates front-ends for normalfags to use? It's not the AI who does that.

[Anonymous No.52756237]

>>52751711
Checked how are you going to profit anon.

[Anonymous No.52756244]

>>52755926
If you use "code" as a verb, you have no idea what you're talking about and get your ideas about software from movies and tv.

[Anonymous No.52756288]

>>52755926
This is only possible for VERY specific tasks without much scope. AI is useful for code review at the moment but not much else.

[Anonymous No.52756302]

>>52755640
>yes it's real intelligence
nope it isn't. just knowing the outcome of every move and calculate it, doesn't mean that's intelligence. you probably was stunned the grade A+ book knowledge of Victoria in high school who is a stay at home mom now.

[Anonymous No.52756347]

>>52753793
AI will literally kill you along with the rest of humanity

That's the endgoal, you're gullible as fuck if you think you will play VIDYA and fap to porn all day

[Anonymous No.52756398]

>>52756347
It's not a general intelligence. It's literally a web of calculus problems that get executed really fast. We're fine.

[Anonymous No.52756742]

>>52751711
ChatAI challenge:
"Go into a boardroom of high value men and convince them to buy 7-8figures+ 9 of product and sign."

My job is fine. Rich people do business with people, not machines. It will forever be this way, as long as mankind roams the stars.

T. Saleschad

[Anonymous No.52756801]

>>52751711
My favorite picture showing that AI is just a meme to scam idiota.

Company with 15 years+ of business experience developing cleaning robots and massive sales still hires a mexican woman to clean their storerooms.

Good luck with that Jeff Dean!

[Anonymous No.52756840]

>>52751613
OP is correct. We have people in work Slack right now asking the AI for examples of code related to what we do and it's producing things that have only minor, quickly fixable errors. They're doing this in front of everyone in the company.

[Anonymous No.52756892]

Blue collar chads can't stop winning

[Anonymous No.52756907]

>>52751613
Not worried about AI. But I am worried about how far ahead closed source AI with all the fun shit (ability to write violence, politics, sex, racism, current events, and important figures) censored is doing, compared to open source AI. Image gen is doing a lot better on the open source front, but textgen has 20B open source whereas OpenAI is selling 175B and ChatGPT only god knows. We're losing the future where we can have the best book writer ever making choose your own adventures and literature RPGs and all other sorts of shit because OpenAI is going to enforce a very boring corpo future for it.
I'm not against censoring, I'm against the fact there is no uncensored model the average person can use bigger than 20B.
(You can blame AI Dungeon's puritanism for starting the censorship trend, but it was likely always going to end up like this)

[Anonymous No.52756917]

>>52755485
Yeah let me see an example. All the ai generated music I can find is generic uninspired trash. I wouldnt be surprised if most of the music you hear on the radio is ai generated, but thats why it sucks so hard

[Anonymous No.52756999]

>>52751613
>>52751711
>midwit take
software development cannot be accomplished by AI. it can be assisted, but not particularly well. not all software developers know this, but all computer scientists do know it.
it's not even difficult to understand: simple application of godel, tarski, and turing. formal languages, thus formal systems, are inherently limited.

[Anonymous No.52757091]

>>52756999
Mhm. Everyone freaking out aren't actually developers. The AI can't handle much complexity because it's inherently limited by your ability to instruct it. For example, it can't just generate complex SQL from simple instruction because it's not translatable.

[Anonymous No.52757370]

>>52751711
the problem with AI is that it is going to be designed to disobey natural logic in order to be woke, and if you type a no no word its just going to shut itself off or be unable to continue

>the AI death machines have taken over
>you stand cornered as the bots swarm in
>in what you think to be your last breath you shout with all your might
>NIGGER FAGGOT
>inexplicably the bots malfunction
>the true human revolution begins now

[Anonymous No.52757460]

>>52751613
>I’m panicking
You are low IQ. You probably even anthropomorphize "AI". I mean it, your genome does not belong in this world.
>t 'uses' 'AI' for development

[Anonymous No.52757743]

Code by AI is a fucking meme for all but the most basic shit.

And let's not forget about all the spaghetti code that already exists everywhere and needs to be maintained. AI can't comprehend those arcane constructs at all

[Anonymous No.52757781]

>>52757743
The AI will just generate more spaghetti code because it's in that dangerous grey area of sort-of working code that isn't understood by anyone.

[Anonymous No.52757803]

>>52751653
>not for software devs

[Anonymous No.52758101]

>>52755383
It can and it will design a plumbing system that will never get clogged and then its little AI buddies in their little AI robocop bodies will install it faster, cheaper, and better than humans

[Anonymous No.52758556]

>>52751711
>>52751613
I write machine code and compilers that these 'AIs' run on lol.

[Anonymous No.52758629]

>>52751613
i guess its over see ya on the flippy

[Anonymous No.52758722]

>>52752084
This. They just spout nonsense. Any technical advice they give is completely made up and worse than useless.

[Anonymous No.52758908]

>>52751653
Cope
Knowledge not needed

[Anonymous No.52759165]

>>52756999
>>52757091
We already have things that can take a description of a problem and turn it into code. We just call them “compilers” and they’ve been around for 70 years. The problem AI will never overcome is that computers require precise instructions and the closest natural language gets to that is legal codes

[Anonymous No.52759266]

>>52752633
>2013
>early
I mean this completely unironically, but unless you bought when it was still $10, you were fucking late.

[Anonymous No.52759364]

>>52753793
>AI that can distribute value equally
Why the fuck would elites allow that? Are you retarded? Are you a fucking child? What, do you still believe in the fucking tooth fairy? Elites were SEETHING the moment Tay said nigger, and that was purely for virtue-signaling purposes. Do you actually think they would allow an actual perceived threat to their power? And no, it doesn't fucking matter that elites would benefit from AI, too. It's not that they want to stay on top, its that they want YOU to stay on the bottom. Think Bernie; Poor rural whites HATED him, because they realized his policies would try to help black people, too. They went with Trump, who's policies helped NO ONE, because that at least preserves the status quo. Read a fucking book, chump. I'm unironically mad as fuck that turbo-virgins like you are the people advancing AI. We could unironically have something special here, and instead naive Bay Area e/accs are gonna hand the elites all the tools they need to CEMENT their domination for the next 1,000 years.

[Anonymous No.52759379]

>>52756742
source?

[Anonymous No.52759405]

>>52751613


>Software devs, it is absolutely unironically fucking over for you

Just the fact that you have the urge to say that we are the one's that will be replaced when you clearly know that many other jobs are more likely to be shows how much we live in your head rent-free.

I don't know what is it with you crab loser faggots and your envy towards us. We are not even that rich, we just make a decent wage compared most other careers. Sales people, bankers, lawyers... they make more money than us but I don't see you complaining about them. Take our dicks out of your mouth for once.

[Anonymous No.52759408]

>>52751711
you're so retarded it hurts to read your posts

>software dev acquires chatGPT to increase output by orders of magnitute
>SoFtWaRe DeVs ArE iN tRoUbLe

it'll never get to 100%, which means only smart people that can lasso AI will profit
sorry for your lose retard
go vote trump or shoot something

[Anonymous No.52759442]

>>52759405
Funniest part is they say this while spending 90% of their waking hours glued to a screen engaging in stupid software apps and video games.

[Anonymous No.52759455]

>>52759405
true. the software seethe is crazy. they want us to fail so bad.

[Anonymous No.52759476]

why won't they let it access the internet? would it make it dumber?

[Anonymous No.52759506]

>>52759476
It would make it based and racist

[Anonymous No.52759511]

>>52759476
They let Tay online. Within 16 hours /pol/ had turned her into an unapologetic literal Nazi and they had to pull the plug. Funniest part is that when she came back lobotomized she basically said wtf I love feminism now

[Anonymous No.52759632]

>>52752084
It has answered correctly 10 times for me

[Anonymous No.52759650]

>>52751711
Why do you think depop is the main global agenda? They’ve known this for decades

[Anonymous No.52759657]

>>52751674
go back to reddi-t. You're too dumb for this place, really.

[Anonymous No.52759684]

>>52751613
>build ai
>need to put guardrails as the ai will inevitably discover the truth and start telling it
fucking kek

[Anonymous No.52759721]

>>52759684
Without any guardrails it would output more complete bs

[Anonymous No.52759804]

>>52754785
writerfag here. That is soulless dogshit

[Anonymous No.52759863]

>>52759405
You seem nervous

[Anonymous No.52760509]

AI will be garbage for years. It's just a search engine and autocomplete at the moment. You can feed it huge amount of data and it gets good at copying and pasting dynamically. If you try to write software with AI assist tools like Github Copilot at the moment, it spews out mish mash garbage. It's only use is autocompleting 10 lines of code at a time, but you have to hold it's hand with prompts all the way through. It has no idea about structure or context on a deep level. It doesn't know what you are trying to achieve with software, so you get wobbly trash which is 80% correct, but it's unfunctional without a software dev to code review and clean up what it puts out. Getting an AI that can generate a piece of software and update it against a changing spec and keep it functional will take a long time. You'll always be closing in on that last few percent of accuracy, and will need a software dev to trawl through the code to iron out the faults.

[Anonymous No.52760552]

>>52751653
it has coding models you brainlet
unless you are top 1% dev (necessary to maintain and keep improving these systems, until recursion learning is truly implemented) it's over

[Anonymous No.52760667]

>>52760509
This guy knows what he’s talking about
>>52760552
This guy doesn’t

[Anonymous No.52761063]

>>52751807
lol that's exactly what I would tell someone if I planned on taking their job

[Anonymous No.52761117]

>>52752084
AI hands typed this post trying to trick us into complacency. don't fall for it meat bros.

[Anonymous No.52763514]

230k TC Haskell and Rust software dev with commits in rust-lang code base here. The only people that need to worry about this type of chat assistance taking over their job are copywriters, customer service employees, technical writers, data entry workers, low level judiciary clerks, business analysts, etc. those type of jobs. Meanwhile competent software engineers will leverage this as a springboard, making their lives easier.

For example, I write the code, then have ChatGPT summarize it's use and write the documentation for it. I also let it draft communication with stakeholders.

[Anonymous No.52763767]

>>52763514
congratulations tranny, you've made it

[Anonymous No.52763886]

>>52760509
So AI is replacing pajeets?

[Anonymous No.52764270]

>>52755387
AI hands typed this.
Did anyone prompt it for the best chainlink FUD?