ICP & AVAX friendship thread

[Anonymous No.52740224]

if you hold ICP say something nice about AVAX

if you hold AVAX say something nice about ICP

we are all friends here. i'm tired of all the fighting.

[Anonymous No.52740238]

>>52740224
AVAX and ICP are both scams. ICP is a centralised shitcoin with instant death tokenomics, and AVAX is a roach vapourware scam. Both claim to have solved the trilemma despite obviously failing to do so in just about every way.

[Anonymous No.52740243]

>>52740238
Cope cope cope
AVAX is the future of defi

[Anonymous No.52740247]

What if I hold SOL

[Anonymous No.52740272]

>>52740247
Also a very obvious scam. Never change /biz/

[Anonymous No.52740288]

what is icp? avax has no competitors

[Anonymous No.52740351]

You're an AVAX baggie trying to cling to ICP, same as >>52734511

[Anonymous No.52740366]

>>52740224
Both are scam, I own both
>>52740288
Disgusting low effort and not funny meme

[Anonymous No.52740422]

>>52740366
it is low effort and not meant to be funny yes but it is up to the point :)

[Anonymous No.52740431]

>>52740224
I hold both.

[Anonymous No.52740461]

>>52740224
Well, I only hold AVAX, don't even know what ICP is, or as I'm seeing, was

[Anonymous No.52740475]

>>52740224
Fuck that scam roach chain

[Anonymous No.52740479]

>>52740475
>Mom I posted it again

[Anonymous No.52740499]

>12 replies and not a single friendly post
I worked really hard putting this thread together and you fuckers are ruining it

[Anonymous No.52740515]

>>52740224
I hold AVAX. The only thing I have nice to say to ICP is nice try throwing out that pathetic CryptoLeaks hit piece. I admire the commitment it takes to be willing to sacrifice the last shred of dignity by co-conspiring with the BSV crowd to try and take down your largest competitor.

We will survive anything you throw at us, its in our nature.

[Anonymous No.52740541]

>>52740499
AVAXXeds are obsessed and afraid of ICP. They won't say anything good about it. Why do you think the board has been filled with their shilling and fudding all month long?

[Anonymous No.52740551]

>AVAXXeds are obsessed and afraid of ICP. They won't say anything good about it. Why do you think the board has been filled with their shilling and fudding all month long?

[Anonymous No.52740564]

>>52740551
See? They just can't help it. They are obsessed. If their ghostchain was worth anything they would talk about it instead of trying to fud competitions.
You won't see them discuss their own project because they spend their time flinging shit at ICP to convince themselves that they are good.

[Anonymous No.52740597]

>>52740564
And Avax doesn't do this to Ethereum? Hypocrites.

[Anonymous No.52740618]

>>52740597
If you think AVAX's existence threatens Ethereum in any way shape or form you are even more deluded that I initially anticipated.

[Anonymous No.52740662]

>>52740618
It doesn't and I didn't say it does. I'm saying Avax shills like to FUD Ethereum instead of focusing on their own chain, just like every Ethereum killer.
>initially anticipated
It's my first post? What did you "initially anticipate"?

[Anonymous No.52740724]

>>52740662
>I'm saying Avax shills like to FUD Ethereum instead of focusing on their own chain
So why are you replying to me when that's exactly what I'm saying in my own post? You even worded it in such a way that makes it sound like is ETH fudding AVAX and not the other way around.
>It's my first post? What did you "initially anticipate"?
AVAXoids delusions about their chain. Did you even bother reading the posts you are replying to?

[Anonymous No.52740790]

>>52740224
AVAX ICO buyer here, ICP was an amazingly orchestrated scam.
Also takes skill to be as shameless as they were.

[Anonymous No.52740798]

>>52740724
I might have replied before reading deep enough but ICP does the Eth fudding too so my point stands.

[Anonymous No.52740849]

>>52740798
>ICP does the Eth fudding
That's simply not true. In fact, ICPtards keep babbling about how ICP is a parallel chain to ETH because that's what Vitalik himself said.
If you are actually trying to equate the random 'ICP makes ETH obsolete' from the desperate stream of roach fud you are, indeed, more deluded that I initially anticipated.

[Anonymous No.52741093]

>>52740224
why do icpeople get so upset when i post this guy in their threads? kek

[Anonymous No.52741191]

>>52740515
Cringe. It’s also in your nature to shit in the street and be poor

[Anonymous No.52741208]

>>52741191
Don't pretend that you're not a disgusting pajeet

[Anonymous No.52742139]

>>52741093
Nobody gets upset it's just old and not funny.

Wow you stuck the Dfinity logo over a guy covered in poo, well done, please provide us with some more content that a 6 year old would find funny.

Fucking unfunny retard.

[Anonymous No.52742165]

>>52740224
I hold both, so I will not say anything friendly.
fuck you

[Anonymous No.52742170]

>>52742139
>t. seething tranny with a 3 figure buy in price

[Anonymous No.52742255]

>>52740224
>xtz id

i hold all 3 lol

[Anonymous No.52742278]

>>52740224
Avax is a scam and emin is a scammer

[Anonymous No.52742280]

Fuck both these networks. Polygon shits on both of them.

>verification not required

checked.

[Anonymous No.52742567]

>>52742280

[Anonymous No.52742717]

>>52740515
ICP can't stand the fact that nobody wants to build on that scam chain and everybody realized that by this point. They can't do anything about it rather than making up stuff all over the internet

[Anonymous No.52742969]

>>52742139
Cry more baggie!

[Anonymous No.52743270]

>>52740238
>ICP is a centralized shitcoin with instant death tokenomics
>AVAX is a roach vapourware scam
when the fudder says "scam", you know which one is better

[Anonymous No.52743324]

>>52743270
icp has an actual use case avax is just a meme

[Anonymous No.52743349]

>>52743324
>icp has a use
>avax doesnt
lol how is not allowing the entirety of the crypto-sphere; every coin, every chain to scale infinitely NOT useful? Eth? Fixed. Polgyon? Fixed and secured. BTC? Its now capable of being used as a currency as intended if subnetted. And so on and so on. What does ICP do? "I can MAKe a WebSitE MaOM"

[Anonymous No.52743362]

I only hold AVAX of those two.

Good for you that you seek peace and union in the world, and all that, but for me it is unthinkable to bet on ICP.

Wholesome bait.

[Anonymous No.52743388]

Theres nothing wrong holding either AVAX or ICP as long as you understand what you have. Looking at the threads of bickering it's clear that a lot of avax holders don't know what ICP does and vice versa.

Actually it's pretty clear nobody knows shit about fuck, even about their own coins, and instead of learning more about both people just decide to make shit up and try and shout the loudest until they think they've proven themselves correct.

[Anonymous No.52743470]

>>52743349
AVAX shills go crazy over a validator with a centralized CCP asset, thinks anyone would want to give over everything to another layer of centralized actors that can shut the entire network down if they have downtime or wanted to fuck with cryptards.

[Anonymous No.52743570]

>>52743349
>allowing the entirety of the crypto-sphere; every coin, every chain to scale infinitely NOT useful? Eth? Fixed. Polgyon? Fixed and secured. BTC? Its now capable of being used as a currency as intended if subnetted. And so on and so on

i just dont understand the real world use cases for those either that's why. Maybe NFTs will take off again that's why i own a small stack. I've yet to been redpilled on why we need 5 zillion different L1s

[Anonymous No.52743619]

>>52743570
BECAUSE THEY JUST ARE NEEDED OK!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.52743896]

>>52740288
Alibaba CEO is a fucking idiot in all the sense of the word. Watch his interview with Elon Musk

[Anonymous No.52743913]

>>52740224
I hold AVAX, idgaf about ICP but AVAX's partners ALBT are a good one, kek.

[Anonymous No.52744129]

>>52740224
I only hold IcyPee and Plebbit. How fucked am I?

[Anonymous No.52744330]

>>52743570
Think of it more as there are different VMs/execution environments needed for different things. A lot of the duplicated EVM's avalanche makes obsolete, including ETH itself IMO. But really what avalanche does is it abstracts consensus away from developers. So instead of Solana worry about their shitty broken proof of history crap they could instead run the Solana VM as an avalanche subnet and solve a lot of their downtime and consensus vulnerabilities and just focus on making a really fast parallelized VM. There's bags involved though so this probably won't happen. Therefore you see all these L1s with their own token and a million copies of classical consensus and EVM and they're all bottlenecked by consensus still.

[Anonymous No.52744803]

>>52740224
stfu fucking jeet

[Anonymous No.52744831]

>>52740224
I have a good experience with both coins, even though ICP scared me with its Internet Identity Anchor shit.

[Anonymous No.52744870]

>>52744330
I kind of thought AVAX was cool until they started their shitty subnet nonsense. It's just another side chain bullshit scaling solution which is FAKE AND GAY AND DOESN'T WORK

[Anonymous No.52744980]

>>52744870
Horizontal scaling is pretty much required with blockchain tech. AVAX, ICP, and Cosmos all got this pretty much right.

[Anonymous No.52744995]

>>52744980
horizontal scaling is required when you havn't actually solved the trilemma and are a fucking lying scammer

[Anonymous No.52745123]

>>52744995
You can't solve the trilemma, it's a corollary of the CAP theorem.

[Anonymous No.52745261]

>>52740224
Avax is the most anti-fragile project, since it’s the only one with devs that will survive a nuclear holocaust.

[Anonymous No.52745466]

>>52744995
One chain with infinite TPS doesn't make sense. Even in traditional IT everything isn't run off some omni-server kek. Separation of concerns is just good engineering.
>>52745123
The trilemma doesn't have any sort of analytical or mathematical basis unlike the CAP theorem, it's sort of just an intellectual meme in crypto. Snow consensus actually does "solve" this.
>>52745261
topkek

[Anonymous No.52745505]

>>52745466
>The trilemma doesn't have any sort of analytical or mathematical basis unlike the CAP theorem, it's sort of just an intellectual meme in crypto.
The CAP theorem just means that, when links break in a distributed system, you either have to decide to keep it running and accept inconsistent data, or shut it down. Bitcoin accepts inconsistent data, but designates disconnected parts of the network with less hashpower as the losing one. The basic problem still exists in crypto.
>Snow consensus actually does "solve" this.
Do you have any good intro on it or a QRD?

[Anonymous No.52745596]

I heard about AVAX, but ICP? it's the first time I hear about that coin lmao

[Anonymous No.52745852]

>>52744870
>retard doesnt understand how the Avalanche Consensus works
Top kek what a Laggard

[Anonymous No.52745893]

>>52740224
I intend to buy some avax after I buy all the other stuff I want to buy

[Anonymous No.52745984]

I think ICP will be huge, top 3 market cap, it will look so obvious looking back. Screencap this.

[Anonymous No.52745988]

>>52740224
I hold ICP and must say that AVAX anons are very energetic and charismatic despite the fact that they are shilling a double spend eth fork created by a subhuman roach

[Anonymous No.52746159]

>>52745466
>>52745505
>>52745852

Every AVAX shill is retarded and so apparently none of you understand how your chain (or anything else) works either.
>HURR DURR LET'S JUST MAKE MORE CHAINS CUZ OUR CHAIN IS ONLY 50TPS
>HURR DURR MUH VALIDATOR RENT SEEKING IS TOTALLY SUSTAINABLE

disgusting and retarded. your chain has no traffic on it. your shills invade every other coin thread to screech about your shitty ghostchain. You're nearly as a bad as polygon (another infinite side chain scam).

[Anonymous No.52746623]

>>52745505
Sure but Im just saying those are physical realities whereas the blockchain trilemma is more an observation of the existing systems whenever that phrase was coined. Avalanche doesn't solve the CAP theorem itself obviously.

Essentially it uses subsampling of the network to vote in successive rounds to avoid all to all communication in consensus. It offers a probabilistic guarantee of finality on the current block sort of like bitcoin, however the math works out such that the guarantee probability is 1-e where e is an arbitrary very small number, contrasting to classical consensus which guarantees strictly with a probability of 1 and nakamoto which is a limit function. Once a block is finalized though it's 100% final and irreversible. Essentially what this means is that messaging complexity is only Olog(N) and therefore the number of nodes in the network is decoupled from the performance of the network. Also the way the math works out means that liveness and safety thresholds are decoupled. Currently I believe safety is parametrized to be 80% byzantine. Here's the whitepaper though if you want more details, it's not very long and has all the math: https://assets.website-files.com/5d80307810123f5ffbb34d6e/6009805681b416f34dcae012_Avalanche%20Consensus%20Whitepaper.pdf

[Anonymous No.52747034]

>>52740224
I don't understand why they want harmony between AVAX and ICP after all the crap ICP has done. Leave the niggers who want to support that shit away from AVAX.

[Anonymous No.52747369]

>>52746623
>hey just download this uploaded random pdf

i wouldn't download that especially from random upload sites as pdf can contain a virus.

[Anonymous No.52748193]

>>52740541

>Afraid of ICP

KEK

[Anonymous No.52748305]

>>52742969
I enjoy it and keep buying. The tech is what we need, internal dns and we hosting all on the icp with a unique identity that I use to authenticate with all the websites and dapps. And this is only a fraction but it's what I care about. Not shilling for it though because I'm still buying and don't need to shill to artificially pump my "bags". Do you have any new ones though? I think I've seen every iteration with this guy and it is getting pretty old now that I think about it.

[Anonymous No.52748521]

>>52748305