[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 574 KB, 2520x1680, f9d74a0a14c0a1d97fb1a26b752c7933.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52722171 No.52722171 [Reply] [Original]

My job will unironically be replaced by AGI, it is only a question of building the robots capable of maneuvering itself.

So how do you financially prepare for the AGI Future?

>> No.52722281
File: 1.29 MB, 1624x2458, 3c3538c7f65f73b5a1bb3a7e5c0cd1ec.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52722281

>>52722171
AGI is inevitable because of its immense need—AGI will do all the back-breaking, repetitive toiling that humans are 1) inefficient at doing in the first place and 2) unwilling to do anyway. That is to say that ANY job that can be taught by other people will eventually be replaced with AGI—because if you can teach people to do something, you can "teach" AGI to do it. Teaching people is no different that programming AGI.

The most commonly touted position that is said to be unreplaceable by AGI is that of nursing. The reasoning is simple: you cannot fake human-ness. But I think that false. Clearly with the advent of ChatGPT, it is possible to emulate human-ness. From a more foundational point of view: because humans are bounded by the laws of physics, and that matter is also bounded by the laws of physics, and that matter is composed of all material in the universe, and because humans are built upon matter, it is possible to turn ANY form of matter to emulate human-ness. Thus nursing is absolutely replaceable by AGI. Additionally, no NEET wants to be a nurse anyway.

So what positions are "safe" against AGI? At least, long enough for anons in the world to retire early?