/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.52693219]

December 1st. Staking in t minus 5 days. Have you decided to stake?

[Anonymous No.52693240]

stake and lock my link for a whole year? And for what? A measly %4? Nah.

[Anonymous No.52693340]

only a fucktarded fool would stake
send it to 0$

[Anonymous No.52693353]

>>52693219
No, I will never stake my Link because it's sounds like a fucking scam plus I don't trust Sergey

t. 7k holder

[Anonymous No.52693365]

>>52693240
>%4
>>52693340
>0$

[Anonymous No.52693411]

>staking
>raising funds to dump
lmao

[Anonymous No.52693424]

>>52693219
Yes because Sergey is the love of my life and if he wants my linkies than he shall have them

Also for some reason my staking makes trannies seethe

[Anonymous No.52693451]

Until someone can explicitly state why there's a lockup requirement for v0.1 then no, I don't really feel like staking in its current state. It's just a bad deal all around. Chainlink has given us a paper promise on when the tokens can be withdrawn, and we just have to take their word for it. The inverse of what happened today could happen, where they'll put out a tweet saying
>Due to unexpected delays for staking v0.2, unfortunately withdrawing staked tokens will be pushed back another 6 months
There's absolutely nothing stopping them from doing this. It's more a matter of principle than anything to be honest, I just don't want to enter into this type of agreement with a company that explicitly has built their identity around "TRUTH > TRUST" and having cryptographic guarantees.

[Anonymous No.52693565]

>>52693219
>imagine entrusting your stinkies to this fat fuck
ngmi