W-wait guys

[Anonymous No.52631199]

How the fuck is our athmosphere contained if there is a vacuum all around earth aka space? Can somebody explain?

[Anonymous No.52631206]

Gravity

[Anonymous No.52631208]

>>52631199
Because Caroline's pussy grips the earth's atmosphere into place

[Anonymous No.52631218]

>>52631208
ftx is solvent

[Anonymous No.52631230]

>>52631206
That is absolutely retarded. Think about it anon. How can an athmosphere exist in a vacuum without barrier between the vacuum and the athmosphere. Its not possible.

[Anonymous No.52631232]

>>52631199
Earth is flat

[Anonymous No.52631241]

>>52631199
>space is a vacuum
It’s just a theory and one that’s been proven wrong
That’s why physicists have come up with dark matter, something that holds the universe together
The vacuum theory doesn’t hold up

[Anonymous No.52631250]

>>52631199
Based retard
A vacuum isn't like a vacuum cleaner. It just means there's nothing there. Since there's an atmospheric gradient from the surface upward, there's a smooth transition from the atmosphere into space. But retards hear the word "vacuum" and assume there should be sucking out the atmosphere. That would only happen if there was a large difference in pressure which would need to be equalized. Please read a book.

[Anonymous No.52631251]

>>52631230
Gravity plus ozone layer

[Anonymous No.52631264]

>>52631199
Air molecules are really slow. 0.5km/s do they can't achieve escape velocity of 11km/s. It's all gravity.

[Anonymous No.52631269]

>>52631208
This is the most reasonable answer until now.

[Anonymous No.52631284]

>>52631199
seeing how fucking retarded this board makes me confident that I will succeed. If you can't even mentally reason this out then you are fucked. How obvious does it have to be? Vacuums don't just "suck" everything up. The only reason it's hard to keep a vacuum on earth is because the vacuum is surrounded by "stuff" which wants to be closer to the earth, so the "stuff" tries to fill the void created by the vacuum. The atmosphere is contained because all the "stuff" in the atmosphere wants to go towards the earth while the Vacuum (which is: NOTHING) has no such inclinations.

[Anonymous No.52631289]

>>52631250
This is such a retarded take i dont know what to say, its not possible to have a smooth transition from something (athmosphere) to nothing (vacuum)
>>52631241
This makes the most sense thanks fren
>>52631251
Reddit is down the hall to the left
>>52631264
Go check your brain out anon, you might be tarded

[Anonymous No.52631298]

>>52631284
Youre the retard, it doesnt make sense. Zoom out, there is a vacuum all around our tiny earth, it wouldnt have any Problem at All sucking our athmosphere away.

[Anonymous No.52631301]

>>52631199
A little thing called gravity, anon.

[Anonymous No.52631309]

>>52631230
How can a lake exist without a barrier to the atmosphere?

[Anonymous No.52631325]

>>52631230

The atmosphere has mass and is pulled close to the earth by gravity. You’re trying to equate a small scale delta p scenario to planetary physics, retard.

[Anonymous No.52631328]

>>52631289
Lmao I know you're just trolling but for anyone who actually doesn't know, the "atmosphere" is not just one homogeneous thing. As the elevation increases, the air thins out. Essentially, there are less particles per whatever-unit-you-want^3. Magically, when that number hits 0 (or near as makes no difference), it is now a vacuum (since again, a vacuum is defined by a space containing nothing). Please don't mistake the lack of something (a vacuum) as a physical object.

[Anonymous No.52631330]

>>52631298
Vacuum doesn't suck, anon, it just doesn't push back. Atoms in the atmosphere that take off towards the vacuum aren't stopped by bumping into anything in the vacuum, so if it were not for gravity all the atoms would eventually take off. But gravity pulls them back.

[Anonymous No.52631350]

>>52631298
He’s right
The math behind it says we would be losing our atmosphere at a much higher rate
Scientists can’t explain why the computer simulations don’t add up
They’re introducing “dark matter” as a possibility which is an invisible substance the exists through the whole universe that holds everything together, including planets.
It’s all bullshit explanations at stuff mystics have known forever.
Before 100 years ago scientists called the ether a substance that held the universe together and was invisible. But last century scientists said ether didn’t exist
Now they call dark matter what they used to call ether

[Anonymous No.52631362]

>>52631199
bcoz its spinning really fast like the gravitron when you stick to the wall

[Anonymous No.52631363]

>>52631350

Ah okay,

So once again - it’s the Jews.

[Anonymous No.52631383]

>>52631362
do zoomers know about the gravitron?

[Anonymous No.52631409]

>>52631383
One guy did this at the fair in town. He leaned back too far and rippen through that canvas ceiling above him. I guess it fling him about a block away before he landed in somebody's yard.They still use the same machine, but there's a duct tapped patch over one of those triangles

[Anonymous No.52631507]

>>52631350
The ether was a hypothetical medium through which light could propagate as a wave. Now its just a shitcoin that propagates nothing.

[Anonymous No.52631519]

>>52631350
So ether is not the same the as dark matter at all

[Anonymous No.52631527]

>>52631519
They’re two separate attempts to describe the same thing
Don’t be dense

[Anonymous No.52631535]

>>52631527
No. No they are not.

[Anonymous No.52631556]

>>52631527
Dont be "dense"

I assume thats a dark matter pun?

[Anonymous No.52631560]

>>52631230
Shut the fuck up nigger. So talk about your faggot nerd shit on /sci/

[Anonymous No.52631572]

>>52631298
Again, vacuums don't suck. You are so fucking retarded that you hear the word "Vacuum" and think "oh it's like the thing I use for my floor, it'll suck everything up!". The only reason people think vacuums suck is because 1) In your case you see the word vacuum and stop thinking entirely or 2) they have seen how hard it is to maintain a vacuum on earth.

For case 2: It is difficult to maintain a vacuum on earth because the atoms surrounding the vacuum want to fill the empty space. They want to do this because they are being attracted towards the center of the earth.

There is nothing attracting them to the vacuum outside of space because vacuums have no mass.

>>52631328
Yes,

[Anonymous No.52631593]

>>52631535
>science says ether doesn’t exist
>computers models says there must be a substance like ether
>scientists invent dark matter
Go back you retarded bitch
You act like you know these are two separate things and they’re only theories
No one has actually seen either substance

[Anonymous No.52631631]

Some of it does escape. Helium for example just floats on out, leading to helium shortage here on earth. You are holding helium balloons in your portfolio aren't you anon

[Anonymous No.52631634]

People falsely assume that because there is a pressure gradient as we gain altitude, that it is reasonable to say it follows that this goes down to zero. Completely ridiculous and breaks gas laws of physics. See vid which shows what happens when we suck the air out of a railroad car.
https://youtu.be/Zz95_VvTxZM
Also, to say 'gravity' holds the atmosphere down is beyond retarded when it can't hold down a butterfly. The indoctrination with the spinning ball earth is very deep and it's not easy to wake people up if they're not ready to be.
Ever wonder how the atmosphere stays perfectly above this rotating ball? That would mean the upper atmosphere travels FASTER than the lower atmosphere. How? The whole model is fucking stupid yet here we are.
The truth is they don't want us venturing beyond our containment zone, hence Antartica is shut off and we're told we're on a ball. The idea is reinforced daily on every media outlet. Why? When you wake up you start to realise why.

[Anonymous No.52631646]

Does something have to exist? why can't there just be nothing?

[Anonymous No.52631647]

>>52631289
who told you space was a vacuum cleaner? hahaha thats retarded!
Just because youve heard fag degraus tyson call space a vaccum, doesnt mean it acts like a vacuum cleaner LMAO.
mr scientist here thinks space acts like a vacuum what a faggot

[Anonymous No.52631651]

>>52631634
>flat earther shows up
You guys really are a buzzkill

[Anonymous No.52631657]

>>52631350
You are very dumb.
> we would be losing our atmosphere at a much higher rate
We're not losing it at any rate at all because the atoms in the atmosphere do not reach escape velocity.
> They’re introducing “dark matter” as a possibility
No, they don't need dark matter to explain why the atmosphere stays on the planet. It's gravity. Dumbass.

[Anonymous No.52631667]

>>52631208
In this pic, Grippy looks a tidbit nippy.

[Anonymous No.52631681]

>>52631657
No when you enter in all the accepted mainstream measurements the models fell apart
Planets are literally shredded by the vacuum of space
They have to introduce a material that actually makes up most of the material in the universe because space isn’t more devoid of it
Exactly like ether has been described
This is basic shit you can learn on discovery science you retarded faggot

[Anonymous No.52631687]

>>52631593
The universe was hypothesized to have certain properties, and something called the ether was invented to explain those properties. Those same properties were later discovered not to exist in the universe, so the ether concept was abandoned.
Then, it was discovered that the universe had another, completely different set of properties that have nothing whatsoever to do with those first properties. To explain these properties, scientists made up the concept of dark matter.
The ether and dark matter have this in common: They were both models created by scientists to explain certain properties of the universe.
The difference is they are different models, explaining different properties.

[Anonymous No.52631697]

>>52631687
They explain the same properties
There was no one definition of dark matter or ether
You idiots forget you’re talking about theories
Not facts

[Anonymous No.52631705]

>>52631667
kek
check em

[Anonymous No.52631706]

>>52631681
Are you paid to draw attention from some development (like Doge mooning lol) or do you really believe what you're saying?

[Anonymous No.52631708]

most based thread for at least 3 weeks. thanks op

[Anonymous No.52631718]

>>52631230
god works in mysterious ways :^)

[Anonymous No.52631734]

Reminder that the double slit experiment is proof that we are living in a simulation. The engine doesn’t render particles unless there is an observer.

[Anonymous No.52631736]

>>52631697
Ether was there to provide a medium for light to travel in. Dark matter is there to explain the effects of gravitational forces that we don't know where they emanate from. You do see how those are different things, right?
The ether was supposedly evenly spread everywhere, with no gravitational effects, whereas dark matter is lumped unevenly here and there (like regular matter).

[Anonymous No.52631749]

>>52631734
Another thing you have completely misunderstood. The behavior of a photon is the same regardless of conscious observers, unlike what would be implied by the simulation argument you're making.

[Kai Goulter No.52631755]

>>52631705
Allow me with another tidbit.

Here's your (you).

[Anonymous No.52631768]

>>52631706
It’s fucking science bro
All the famous quantum physicists on tv have said the exact same shit about dark matter
Many of them have even noticed the connection to ether
These ideas aren’t new or original to me
>>52631734
This anon gets it
>>52631736
Those are two different descriptions of the same substance
Light travels through the vacuum of space too
Ether’s gravitational effects is that it held everything together
Stop being a soi boy
Go post your bs on r/science

[Anonymous No.52631776]

>>52631749

This is why everyone is shitting on physicists. They act like they know when nobody in the fucking world understands it at all. And I think you are wrong, I’m not saying consciousness is necessarily a factor.

Fuck you bastard bitch

[Anonymous No.52631793]

>>52631230
>>52631199
shut the fuck up nigger, biztards are not ready for this and most def not deserving

learn to keep your mouth shut if you are early.

[Anonymous No.52631832]

>>52631199
ayy force field tech... they dont want us out

[Anonymous No.52631906]

>>52631651
>nothing to contribute but has to make a comment to feel included in the conversation
Nobody noticed you're thick, it's fine. Just sit quietly. Protip: don't say anything else

[Anonymous No.52631921]

>>52631768
Ether was the idea that there existed a fixed coordinate system in the Universe. Einstein showed that no such privileged frame of reference can exist. Ether as a concept is incompatible with relativity.
Dark matter, on the other hand, is not incompatible with relativity. Does that convince you scientists would not agree with you that they are the same thing?

[Anonymous No.52631930]

The only thing NASA sent to space was your imagination. Space is fake and dinosaurs existed alongside man, if at all.

[Anonymous No.52631962]

>>52631921
Dark matter was invented to fit the concept of the ether into relativity
The theory of relativity is wrong anyway
The speed of light is broken through quantum entanglement
>does that convince you scientists would not agree with you that they are the same thing?
You sound like some mod on Reddit
All scientists don’t agree

[Craig Wright No.52632110]

>>52631199

Same way water stays in a cup sitting on your table, even though it's surrounded by comparatively low density air.

[Anonymous No.52632127]

>>52631962
> All scientists don’t agree
But they do try to agree on definitions.
> The speed of light is broken through quantum entanglement
No. And I think you know that. If not, go check the no-communication theorem on wikipedia.

[Anonymous No.52632141]

>>52632127
Information traveling faster then light is breaking the speed of light
It’s been proven many times
Even Einstein included wormholes in his theory of relativity

[Anonymous No.52632176]

>>52632141
> Information traveling faster then light is breaking the speed of light
It would be, yes. Quantum entanglement does not involve information traveling faster than light. Again, google the no-communication theorem.
> Even Einstein included wormholes in his theory of relativity
Wormholes (so far theoretical objects) do not allow information to travel faster than light. If they did, wormholes would also allow travel back in time, which they don't.

[Anonymous No.52632220]

>>52632176
Guess who looks like a asshole?
https://www.newsweek.com/time-travel-possible-wormhole-black-hole-astrophysicist-715038