BTC can't handle the load

[Anonymous No.52609861]

Think about it. It runs at capacity practically 99% of the time.
Daily:
- BTC 300k tx
- ETH 1.2m tx
- XRP 1.2m tx
- etc

All these trash alt coin chains shouldn't even exist to begin with. It should all run on top of Bitcoin. Literally millions of transactions

[Anonymous No.52611037]

>>52609861
you can run any number of chains on top of bitcoin. only instead of trying to embed all the transaction data you can just simply commit to the arbitrary sized blocks with only 32 bytes of hash.

bsv is hot garbage and makes no sense. it has no network security so it's not even good for storing junk data immutably.

[Anonymous No.52611230]

>>52609861
>arguing over who created the biggest shit coin ever
It's slow.
It's expensive.
It's clunky.
It's not programmable.
It's shit.
It glows.
It chinks.
It 97 percents in five holders.

[Anonymous No.52611591]

>>52611230
who ever said bitcoin is not programmable is a gargantuan faggot who doesn't know what he is talking about. whoever said bitcoin is turing complete is also a gargantuan faggot. there is a clear field in the middle where bitcoin exists.

[Anonymous No.52613068]

>>52611591
Wow, what can you program it to do?

[Anonymous No.52613114]

>>52613068
Make me lose money

[Anonymous No.52614043]

>>52613068
script is the code bitcoin uses and it has an extensive op code library which are similar to machine code.
this means that script is similar to the code that a cpu directly works with, its very powerful.
you can even run loops on it so long as you have enough funds to cover the cost of the loop until completion.
honesty the complete restoration of script in bsv is its greatest advantage that no one is paying attention to. BTC also has script but the devs severely crippled its capabilities by altering how some opcodes work and by disabling others.

[Anonymous No.52614094]

>>52614043
it also has been the part of bitcoin since day-1.

[Anonymous No.52614115]

does this altcoin you call bitcoin have it's own haircomb token?

[Anonymous No.52614134]

>>52614043
>the devs severely crippled its capabilities
that's one retarded way to look at it. but the thing is script was a good idea and a horrible one. there is no formal way to prove certain things about bitcoin script and what combinations of opcodes can do.

simplicity is an effort to build a new script language for bitcoin with basically 9 operations 3x3. this scripting language would have a few properties like you could prove the upper bounds on execution time and prove it will terminate etc... while this simple language can be used to construct higher order "opcodes" called jets that will also bring performance enhancements. it's probably only a matter of years for this to bear fruit. right now fully experimental. but it will be able to do more than bitcoin script ever could.

[Anonymous No.52614148]

>>52614134

will ripemd hash be upgraded to 256bit hash?

[Anonymous No.52614197]

>>52614134
give up you op codes goy, its for the blockchains safety. also give up your freedoms goy, for your own safety of course.
fuck the retard btc devs and their pathetic pussy bitch scared thought process.
BSV has script, unbounded and in its original glory, it hasn't been used to attack and destroy BSV by its enemys, its safe, as it always was intended to be.
BSV combines the huge capabilities of script with the scale needed to use this globally, and yet people still think their unscalable low capacity shitcoins are the future.

[Anonymous No.52614207]

>>52609861
How long do you think a transaction will take next bullrun? A week, 2 weeks?

[Anonymous No.52614230]

>>52614148
what do you mean?

[Anonymous No.52614245]

>>52614197
you gave up decentralization and now the whole bsv crapshow runs in papa calvin's basement. if he pulls the plug it's over nobody else can sync up.

[Anonymous No.52614388]

>>52614245
open bitcoin white paper, ctrl F decentralised... hmmm nothing there, how odd.
its almost as if mass decentralisation isnt important compared to fulfilling bitcoins goal of being p2p digital cash.
at what number of unique nodes is a coin considered decentralised?
does this matter when the majority of all hash power physically resides within the same legal jurisdiction?
if decentralisation is to stop centralised control then why is it that blockstream controls btc with an iron fist?
why is it that ETH solved the DAO hack with centralised intervention?
perhaps decentralisation is the biggest meme of them all

[Anonymous No.52614457]

>>52614388
doesn't matter papyal is more decentralized than bsv. even if you think that's not important, the market has a clear say about it. which is why you are at 0.0024.

[Anonymous No.52614478]

https://www.crypto51.app/

You can 51% attack BSV for 1700 bucks an hour. Imagine bagholding this worthless fucking dogshit holy fuck kek

[Anonymous No.52614485]

>>52614457
i wonder tho what kind of special retard you have to be to think bitcoin offers any invention without decentralization? like how fucked in the brain you have to be to think it is not just a massive inefficiency for absolutely no reason or benefit without high degree of decentralization?

i'm so glad these idiots are gone from bitcoin!

[Anonymous No.52614493]

>>52614478
happened before. calvin just tweeted out what is the "legal" chaintip and nodes had to manually invalidate the heavier chain.

dEcENTraLiZeD

[Anonymous No.52614646]

>>52614493
01G?

[Anonymous No.52614829]

>>52614485
>i wonder tho what kind of special retard you have to be to think bitcoin offers any invention without decentralization?
You are not completely wrong, but the role of decentralisation is exagerated. We use it mostly for robustness (nodes come and go, network keeps going) and to allow micropayments.

The WP literally talks about tiny payments in the abstract, but I guess you didn't read that, either.

Decentralisation is a means to an end, not the end itself.

[Anonymous No.52614843]

Millions transactions by millions of people and they all think they arenthe one to get rich.

Get a real job, go to mcdonalds.

[Anonymous No.52615202]

>>52614829
>nodes come and go, network keeps going
that is no longer true for bsv. if taal's node goes offline there are no other full nodes. and nobody can verify the correct behavior of taal's node either because nobody else can sync up a node. many tried for various reasons like research or to continue previous monitoring.

[Anonymous No.52615222]

>>52614829
>The WP literally talks about tiny payments in the abstract
and? i can send single sats on lightning. you can't send single sats on bsv.

bitcoin always wins.

>Decentralisation is a means to an end, not the end itself.
that is true. decentralization is the only way we know to reach our goals. you lost sight of that from the beginning.

[Anonymous No.52616303]

>>52609861
It's funny you put ripple there when it's running at 1% capacity and fees are 0.00015

[Anonymous No.52617606]

Bitcoin now has infinite tps and no fees.

[Anonymous No.52617803]

>>52614829
how much of a drooling retard one has to be to believe that this psychopathic lawyer is satoshi?

[Anonymous No.52617934]

>>52615222
you can send single sats on bsv, why do you post such blatent lies?
bsv node requirements aren't very high, they recommend an 8 core cpu, 64gb of ram and storage space, all of which is cheap to do, not as cheap as a raspberry pi but then again the performance is magnitudes higher.
they've also just released a light node just for devs which has much lower requirements.
fact is that bsv is a public blockchain and anyone can join the network to build on it or mine on it.
funny how no one addressed the blatent centralisation exhibited by Ethereum or Btc and even BCH. Why are these projects allowed to be entirely centralised, probably so, yet BSV isn't considered decentralised enough? the hypocrisy is hilarious.
the funny thing is that BSV has a locked down protocol, it wont change, set in stone, unlike its competitors where the centralised dev teams chop and change the code like the wind changes direction. Utter silence from the critics regarding this point. All you can do is lie and hurl baseless insults (almost always strawmen) while bsv continues to increase its capability and capacity.

[Anonymous No.52617961]

>>52617934
>you can send single sats on bsv
no you can't because you would need to pay a few hundred sats for fess and you have the dust limit. cuck!

[Anonymous No.52617977]

>>52617961
you're the only hero in this community
they're not worth it
you'll make millionaires and biz doesnt understand enough about cryptography to get it
same other accumulating quantum resistant cryptos getting banned on here
and haircomb is even better because it doesnt need a full chain to itself

[Anonymous No.52618524]

>>52617803

What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you cunt? I'll have you know I have a masters in International Commercial Law and doctorates in Theology and Computer Science. I'm the chairman of the fucking Bitcoin Foundation (BSV). I've been involved with the development of cryptographic money since the fucking 1990s. You think you can just insult me like that? I am working on a degree in Polynomial Interpretation of Quantum Mechanical Topological Models from Cambridge. You are a fool that thinks he knows about Bitcoin, when he doesn't. I invented Bitcoin. I am Satoshi Nakamoto. And you are a fucking idiot. I have been involved in this community since the fucking beginning and I will drag you through discovery, legal processes and more. You will not be able to fucking push me around. You are going to get absolutely fucked after I am through with you. You are going to be begging for mercy. I will not relent. You think you can just say shit like that and not suffer any consequences? You are fucking mistaken. You will pay for your fucking mistake. I'm going to break out my big boy legal team and we are going to sue your ass into the fucking ground.

[Anonymous No.52618558]

>>52609861
Native btc integration to Icp next week will speed up btc considerably and allow a platform or “mainnet” to build smart contracts with native btc.
This includes but is not confined to a decentralized on ramp service fiat to btc using icoracles and avoiding any third party intermediary. Icp smart contracts will sign transactions automatically to and from the btc blockchain

[Anonymous No.52619934]

>>52614245
it's so tiresome, i can't believe people still say this
btc is about as decentralized as bsv because you only have 3 nodes that matter and control over 50%
all the millions of non mining nodes don't do anything whatsoever

[Anonymous No.52619944]

>>52614493
that's perfectly normal
the nodes CHOSE to follow calvin

[Anonymous No.52619996]

>>52618558
so icp is gonna spam tx on btc blockchain, when it's already 300k tx per day maxed out
very good
gonna be like cryptokitties on eth and $200 fees, it's gonna cripple it

[Anonymous No.52620062]

>>52614829
You are a fucking idiot. There is absolutely no reason to run a ridiculously inefficient block chain EXCEPT FOR decentralization. Aka TRUSTLESS. Stupid nigger kill yourself and your worthless nigger coin.

[Anonymous No.52620265]

>>52620062
except your "decentralised" blockchains are all controlled centrally. Shit, BTC got taken over by banks that funded Blockstream which paid off the devs.
ETH shit the bed with DAO and the centralised dev team stepped in and centrally fixed things, ETC exists as the unaltered version.
All your talk of decentralisation and yet every decentralised blockchain remains centrally controlled.
At least with BSV we know the protocol wont change, its locked down, complete. No castration of capabilities, just as bitcoin was always meant to be.

[Anonymous No.52620767]

>>52620265
>except your "decentralised" blockchains are all controlled centrally.
only BSC and BSV are. cope more BSVdrone, your shitcoin is going to 0

[Anonymous No.52620871]

>>52609861
All thos talk about BTC coin handling loads makes me wish for some Rule 34 on cryptocurrencies.

[Anonymous No.52620874]

>>52620767
lol you lot have been saying that since day 1, guess what, we're still here and continually building and expanding. What have our competitors accomplished beyond pointless speculation while their miners milk the block reward. There's no plan in place after the next few halvings, the irony is everything else is going to zero because there is no foundation beyond gambling.

[Anonymous No.52620885]

>>52620874
cool, but BSV is a straight up exit scam by Calvin Ayre and his lackeys, and that retarded priest cuck, Craig is NOT Satoshi

[Anonymous No.52620964]

>>52620885
an exit scam where they restored the full capability of the protocol.
an exit scam where they created multi core parralellized server grade node software.
an exit scam where they foster development and assist in organising funding for development teams.
an exit scam where they hold all the valuable IP needed to scale a blockchain.
an exit scam where gavin andresan, john matonis and many others publicly stated that they saw craig sign using satozhi keys.
looks more like hard work rather than a scam.

[Anonymous No.52620969]

>>52620964
>an exit scam where they hold all the valuable IP needed to scale a blockchain.
what the fuck are you babbling about you tech illiterate

[Anonymous No.52620979]

>>52620969
i get it, English is a difficult language for you to understand, but keep at it and one day you'll get it.

[Anonymous No.52620988]

>>52620979
buy more of that worthless shitcoin, one day """""""satoshi""""""""" will surely prove himself correct

[Anonymous No.52621294]

>>52617934
this
>>52617961
>a few hundred sats for fess
Lightning let's you post 1 Sat tx just like Twitter let's you tweet "for free" - you pay elsewhere. LN is a third party system. It's not BTC, no BTC moves for LN tx until some point in the future where you settle. Same as keeping a TAB open with a Bartender WHO TRUSTS YOU.
>>52620062
The point is micropayments at subcent fees and more via programmability. Decentralisation is a meme for stupid people and BTC etc are not decentralised at all anyway:
- BTC is controlled by Core
- ETH controlled by Vitalik and ETH Foundation
Both do whatever changes they fkin want to the chain and have been and continue to do so.
>>52616303
>ripple
You forgot to say "in theory", because in practise only BSV has done anything significant. 20k TPS on LIVEnet, not some testnet or soonNet.

[Anonymous No.52622031]

>>52621294
This poster is a scammer that understands nothing about anything. He has no motivation except shilling a token.

[Anonymous No.52622105]

>>52613114
keko

[Anonymous No.52622175]

Craig is satoshi and bsv is bitcoin

S T I F F
T
I
F
F

[Anonymous No.52622991]

>>52614388
Decentralization is yet to be properly defined. For example, I don't see anyway the blockchain is absolutely decentralized without anonymity and privacy

[Anonymous No.52623596]

>>52622991
in the ol boomer days satoj called it distributed without a single pof,
so that's 2+
before zoomzooms came along with their digital gold and decentralized memes we learned in secondary school to store data in multiple locations so you don't lose it to natural disaster or whatever
2 or 3 or 10 miners, it makes little difference