LPL chads can't stop winning

[Anonymous No.52555996]

>Link native staking will lock your tokens for two years
>Linkpool chads stake will be liquid and will enjoy the good life when staking starts

Pool's closed

[Anonymous No.52556031]

I understand you guys took a massive hit today but don’t try to spin it into “this is great!” because it just looks really sad. Just take the L and move on.

[Anonymous No.52556080]

>>52556031
fpbp
linkniggers and their even more retarded jonny the horserimmer token holders need to stop shitting up this board

[Anonymous No.52556869]

>>52556031
actually there is big relief as it looked like linkpool was not needed in v0.1

[Anonymous No.52556901]

>>52556869
>Sergey explicitly said that LPL is an experimental third party solution that has nothing to do with official staking
>LPLers "so bullish!"

[Anonymous No.52557616]

>>52556901
yeah, no shit

[Anonymous No.52558371]

>>52555996

You will give up 25% of your total stake rewards, in order to sell at 15$ on the run up. I will wait 2 years and sell at $100 with full rewards.

[Anonymous No.52558590]

Pools closed no poolers

[Anonymous No.52558694]

>>52558371
>putting $ before and after the numbers in the same post

[Anonymous No.52558698]

>>52558371
I will invest that run up for a 100x while you lose that opportunity

Idiot nopoolers seething

[Anonymous No.52558777]

>>52558371
pools closed negro

[Anonymous No.52558848]

>>52558371
>timing the market years in advance
Was this comment meant to make you look smart?

[Anonymous No.52558880]

>>52556869
a 50k limit do very little for linkpool or its holders

t. one of its holders

[Anonymous No.52559366]

>>52555996
I did just buy a bunch more lpl
Best guess is half of the nodes with initial 50k allotment (which will go to mid 6 figs when additional space is given to nodes preferentially) will use lpls dynamic staking pool architecture

Fees from that will be nuts, esp with increasing link price from effectuvely permanently reduced locked supply

Chad move is to stake 50% of your stack, buy lpl with 25% before snapshot on 25th and keep 25% to sell in inevitable supply crunch over next year

[Anonymous No.52559509]

>>52558880
you hold lpl and don't understand what they mean by "high quality node operators"?
>Node operators may opt to create or use a third-party delegation system that allows their 50,000 LINK allotment to be filled by LINK token holders from the Chainlink community. Third party and unofficial delegation systems should be viewed as an experiment that are independent from the Staking v0.1 beta.
who is the only team who have created a third-party delegation system?
LINKPOOL
other teams are going to use the team's system to fulfil their allotment
the staking will be liquid (like lido) so can withdraw at any time

[Anonymous No.52559551]

>>52559509
This
Once a few non lpl nodes start using their infra its a defacto monopoly
Remember initially the 25mm is 90/10 community/nodes
The 50mm after that will be at least 50/50 if not node favored

[Anonymous No.52559567]

>>52559509
also it is 50k initially but will go to 150k per node (if they keep same ratio from 25m to 75m)
so if they get even 10 nodes to use their system then there's a need for 1.5m LINK...
i'm sure nodes will contribute some of their own holdings but yeah i'm sure you get the idea
>>52559366
yeah exactly

[Anonymous No.52559581]

>>52559551
source on the next 50m being more node focused? would make it even better
but yeah, even with the 25m ratio it's looking very nice

[Anonymous No.52559680]

>>52556031
2 year LINK lockup is pretty bullish for linkpool liquid staking

[Anonymous No.52559792]

>>52559509
Do you expect a pool on Curve with stLINK/LINK or what?

[Anonymous No.52559956]

>>52559581
This is corporatespeak for "were gonna give future allotment to nodes at the same time we tell nodes they effectively cant sell because time x staked link will determine how many juicy no-overhead ccip/vrf/fss/highfreq pf jobs you get"

[Anonymous No.52560006]

>>52559792
i would think so
>>52559956
thanks, nice catch

[Anonymous No.52560033]

>>52559366
>>52559509
>>52559567
fuck yes

[Anonymous No.52560112]

>>52559366
what's the snapshot on the 25th?

[Anonymous No.52560179]

>>52559366
>buy lpl
I was told the pool was closed. Have lplfags been lying this whole time? Why should I believe them now?

[Anonymous No.52560207]

>>52560179
it's closed in the sense that you can't buy any considerable amount without insane slippage because of how amms are designed
you can try and buy otc though (through airswap), i'd try twitter or telegram
>>52560112
no details out about what it's for

[Anonymous No.52560298]

>>52560179
see here:
https://dune.com/nasdanel/linkpoolinfo
only 60k liquidity across all dexes

[Anonymous No.52560314]

>>52555996
I hope we can sell rewards with linkpool staking.. wasn't too happy with the main announcement. I want income...

[Anonymous No.52560346]

>>52560112
No official info however jhonny has been clear that
Linkpool finished its initial shit over a year ago and link team has been advising on ecosystem stuff that needed development since
Would guess its the same as link staking allowance without the time dependent portion

In other words those allocations for initial dynamic staking on their node and nodes using their infra would be determined by lpla in wallet on 25th

[Anonymous No.52560392]

>>52560179
Its never been wetter and opener

[Anonymous No.52560418]

>>52560207
>buy otc from one of our many baggies in the community group
kek

[Anonymous No.52560451]

>>52556080
came here for horse comment

thanks didn’t disappoint minus the first post faggot

[Anonymous No.52560517]

>>52560392
Post the real chart, we all know the USD works like an increasingly broken clock that is going to be less and less accurate going forward.

[Anonymous No.52561211]

>>52560314
Bump

[Anonymous No.52562073]

POOLERS, OUR TIME IS NOW

[Anonymous No.52563095]

>>52562073
Keep the thread alive. At least no fud here.

[Anonymous No.52563630]

>>52563095
agreed, so can someone give a QRD on what exactly is happening with LinkPool? I have 300k of this beautiful token but I can't decipher all the jargon... are they doing an airdrop to create an EthPool service? Do we get priority staking? whats with this 2 years lock up for chainlink...

[Anonymous No.52563801]

>>52563630
more on this later

[Anonymous No.52563849]

>>52563630
We'll find out on the 25th i hope.

[Anonymous No.52563851]

>>52563801
is now later?

[Anonymous No.52564120]

>>52563630
you don't deserve 300k basically

[Anonymous No.52564214]

2 years lockup? Wtf bros

[Anonymous No.52564232]

Jeez, you're stupid af! Try Bspin. its easy even for ya.
>Online Casino with BTC main currency
>Players deposit, play and withdraw Bitcoin without any additional conversion.
>Many different deposit methods.

[Anonymous No.52564294]

>>52564214
not for lpl holders though
thank you sergey

[Anonymous No.52565662]

>>52562073
It's been our time before now. Didn't make it on LINK, but their partner, ALBT got my ass covered. Not pooling again anon.

[Anonymous No.52565677]

>>52556901
Obviously?

[Anonymous No.52565776]

>>52564120
the universe disagrees anon

[Anonymous No.52566781]

>>52555996
Since its a good thread heres another tidbit
Cll locking staked link for 1-2 years is shitty for early everyman supporters but its great for ponzinomics
Not only does it effectively eliminate that supply for the first 25mm, but it allows a premium for node allocation once returns on staked link are known, even if inaccessable
The willingness to pay that premium (which will likely be >50% since any link from any source can be delgated to node allocation) will create two classes of staked link.
Early access community link is worth link lrice plus accumulated staking rewards minus discount for being illiquid
Node allocation link is worth link price plus staking yield minus premium for buying node space minus illiquidity

This is all to say there will now be even more demand for link at every one of those interfaces (amms swapping staked link for live liquid link or for node allocated staked link) and those yields will have to work out to less than the staking yield as AMM yields are liquid

If there is significant volume the only way for that yield to drop is significant price appreciation of base link, which in turn increases yield of staked link, at least in that initial period

[Linkpool LPL link lpl No.52568012]

>>52560517
fucking this.

[Anonymous No.52568132]

>>52566781
stop with the cope. do you not see how bad this locked staking is? We all believed this project to be different from the rest based on how they handled themselves with no shill and a sense of integrity. They are acting like a regular shitcoin now. Their is no point in locking this up just to get fucked and miss another bull market.

[Anonymous No.52568408]

>>52565776
Based
is what it is

[Anonymous No.52568823]

>>52568132
>They are acting like a regular shitcoin now.

It's now the certificate for shitcoiners. The shill is getting out of hand on Biz. Happy to have sold all my LINK to ALBT before the run. Now you see the difference between the two teams.

[Anonymous No.52568925]

i am grabbing my popcorn because this shitshow is going to be hot hot hot when all you lp faggots lose all your linkies hahahahahahaha fucking linkpool niggers.

[Anonymous No.52569054]

check the volume

[Anonymous No.52569232]

>>52568132
1. Not saying whether this is good or not with respect to actions, im simply saying its good for token demand/price
2. Everyone here has 10k or more link, so the obvious move is to stake all they can in the walled garden of early access and leave the other 3-90k link for selling if there is a speculative bubble (driven by the above factors)
3. Ywnbaw kys

[Anonymous No.52569275]

>>52569232
>1. Not saying whether this is good or not with respect to actions, im simply saying its good for token demand/price
not really, ccip was confirmed in alpha

>2. Everyone here has 10k or more link, so the obvious move is to stake all they can in the walled garden of early access and leave the other 3-90k link for selling if there is a speculative bubble (driven by the above factors)
So that makes it okay for 2 year lock up?

>3. Ywnbaw kys
idk what that means

[Anonymous No.52569561]

I never bought the idea of Linkpool to begin with, and the statement about it being an experiment by a third party ie distancing themselves from it, itself a huge red flag, combined with so many recent rugpulls in this industry, makes me glad I never bought.
Imagine spending a load of dough on LPL, then putting all your Link in there and it rugs? Holy fuck that would really be rope time. But I'm sure you can trust that Johnny character with your financial future... right?

[Anonymous No.52570432]

>>52569561
I trust Jonny in my horse stables