The real 2022/2023 /biz/ Chainlink-like gem

[Anonymous No.52416235]

Alright faggots,

Time to put our thinking hats on and collectively agree upon the most valuable coin we can buy during this accumulation period, before the next bullrun arrives.
Usually the way to find projects as valuable as Chainlink was for /biz/ in 2018 is to scout attentively and eventually get lucky by finding a legitimate project that didn't engage marketing yet, hence it being under the radar and low market cap still, and/or unlisted on big exchanges yet, but nevertheless is lead by a legitimate team with a legitimate (future) profitable and functioning token and product (the token/product may be under construction, as long as it proves itself worthy).

Back in 2018 this board was flooded with Chainlink threads, because we agreed upon discovering the best unpumped gem before it mooned. Chainlink made a lot of us faggots rich, but now, even though Link is still a great buy, it's too high a marketcap to bring the same riches compared to the 2018 upward potential.
Ideal candidate: proper utility of the token driving the price up, legitimate team, low marketcap, and ideally alongside it having great credibility - it should not listed on a major exchange yet and thus will have a GUARANTEED huge listing pump due to its novelty to new retail money finding out about it through the new exchange listing.

Some examples of legitimate candidates, but too high marketcap and already too widely known:
GMX, Chainlink, Oasis (Rose), HNT, ICP

There's definitely one coin that is the best choice to accumulate before the next bull run arrives, but can we find and agree upon it?

[Anonymous No.52416246]

>>52416235
just buy RLC its a guaranteed 30x

[Anonymous No.52416274]

>>52416235
Cypher erium

[Anonymous No.52416290]

>>52416246
You mean 100x

[Anonymous No.52416321]

>>52416235
GRT. It’s the polar opposite in terms of Chainlink in terms of use case. Chainlink is Ying and GRT is Yang. GRT got pumped and now has had a catastrophic dump like Chainlink did. It took shall rise again.

[Anonymous No.52416334]

>>52416246
RLC had its run to $15 with the coinbase listing, now it doesn't have a coinbase listing coming for it anymore.
Unless you can provide some new reasons about why RLC will pump so hard it is not a valuable candidate, sorry

[Anonymous No.52416338]

>>52416235
It's gns and truebit. Now fuck off and delete the thread

[Anonymous No.52416358]

All those you named are part of the heavy bags of a scam group

[Anonymous No.52416363]

>>52416321
>GRT
>400 mil marketcap
Discarded, it's too high marketcap to buy even if it were good, same as the examples i've listed in OP

[Anonymous No.52416397]

>>52416235
Mycelium. GMX knockoff. Actually made it into the top 20 on cryptofees during recent volatility. $15m cap.
Liquidity is basically nonexistent, you can only buy about $2k at a time without causing crazy slippage, but if you're a brokefag who wants to yolo on a 100x, it's one of the better options.

[Anonymous No.52416441]

>>52416235
you will look but you will not find it

[Anonymous No.52416450]

>>52416274
https://www.bis.org/about/bisih/topics/cbdc/mcbdc_bridge.htm
>>/biz/thread/S17296274#p17296274
Follow the yellow brick road!

[Anonymous No.52416451]

>>52416338
Thanks for the input, I'll look into them my bro;
but listen to me, /biz/ doesn't have so much real liquidity to pump any coin to oblivion so i doubt deleting the thread or developing a /biz/ cult around them will really change their price significantly. So i wouldn't worry about that. Still, thanks for your input, cheers.

[Anonymous No.52416484]

>>52416334
If your entire basis of RLC moon potential is based on an exchange listing you don't understand what RLC really is and what theyve been doing this past year.

[Anonymous No.52416506]

>>52416450
HI HOOO HI HOOO HI HOOO A DAIRY OOO

[Anonymous No.52416531]

>>52416363
>even if it were good
Explain why it’s not good

[Anonymous No.52416662]

>>52416274
>>52416450
This?
https://www.cypherium.io/
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/cypherium/
Looks like it has potential at first glance, thanks for sharing

[Anonymous No.52416695]

>>52416484
Then tell me you retarded faggot, cause i know RLC really well as i sold the coinbase pump. What changed? Why is RLC suddenly an even better buy than before the Coinbase listing? I'm open to have my opinion changed, honestly, but deliver at least one argument my man

[Anonymous No.52416713]

>>52416531
Too high marketcap

[Anonymous No.52416715]

>>52416235
unironically this

[Anonymous No.52416719]

>>52416662
Tehehheheheheheheheehhehe
I LOVE CBDC
https://explore.fednow.org/explore-the-city?id=10&building=showcase-theater&page=2&postId=52&vendor=cypherium-blockchain-inc

[Anonymous No.52416744]

>>52416506
Nice, will keep an eye on it for sure, thanks and you're a real nigga

[Anonymous No.52416778]

>>52416719
Very nice, any idea if they're working on listing it to larger exchanges?
>>52416715
Yeah but it's a meme coin, not a real utility other than meme pumpanomics

[Anonymous No.52416790]

>>52416744
YW anon

[Anonymous No.52416844]

wtf this is just a chainlink thread!

kill yourself stink scammers!

chainshit is a fat russian man!

[Anonymous No.52416845]

>>52416778
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/51890634/#51890634
Too many NDA’s to know but I’m sure once the cats out of the bag exchange’s will be lined up

[Anonymous No.52416865]

>>52416790
>>52416845
Cheers

[Anonymous No.52416973]

>>52416441
>RVP's chart

But against which currency? Also, you shouldn't assume some people aren't quietly paying attention

[Anonymous No.52417018]

>>52416973
that's not RVP, and it's in SATs. it has a little over 2x RVP's mcap

[Anonymous No.52417045]

>>52416397
They have their own token? I've been using it on and off for like 5 years now. If not how should I invest in mycelium? It's solid.

[Anonymous No.52417089]

Unironically btc

[Anonymous No.52417157]

>>52416441
>>52417018
Are you gonna spill the beans or what? It's not like there's more than 200-300 people browsing this god forsaken board. Post that shit for your bros if you think it's gonna do well, the same way anons posted about chainlink back in the day.

[Anonymous No.52417258]

>>52416845
>>52416719
How much are you holding?

[Anonymous No.52417295]

>>52417258
Hundreds of thousands

[Anonymous No.52417301]

obviously hpos10i

[Anonymous No.52417454]

>>52416715
Everyone should have a bag. What are you gonna lose? $100?

[Anonymous No.52417678]

>>52416441
>>52417018
Where should i look?

[Anonymous No.52417701]

>>52417018
Well, the charts look very similar save for the denomination. Would like to know what you're talking about, not sure why you'd keep that to yourself, but you do you I guess

For the sake of this thread, I'm interested in the kinds of things that Chainlink will actually enable. These things seem like the next logical steps after the Chainlink DON, which itself was the next logical step after the Ethereum smart contract platform. So looking at RLC, which integrated CL years ago, and RVP, which again will become actually feasible once CCIP comes online and data can move securely between their database/L1 and the greater internet.

Regarding RLC, I'm really not sure why anons here aren't pointing out a few obvious things. iExec has already been leveraging the Chainlink tech stack since Jan 2020: https://medium.com/iex-ec/chainlink-and-iexec-collaborate-to-address-the-complex-off-chain-needs-of-next-generation-702e55ab1ead

And think about what decentralized, confidential cloud computing actually allows for in terms of network architecture. Do you think that BNY Mellon, Nasdaq, Swift and other confirmed Link node operators are really going to trust AWS or cloudfare to host their nodes? They need a distributed and secure hosting solution with 100% uptime that they can pay for using a neutral currency. iExec is perfectly positioned to provide this solution. I could discuss the partnerships, integration and the oracle/AI market etc, but I guess my point is that I think anons shilling RLC here aren't hitting these pretty obvious bull case arguments. I think my stack is as big as it's going to be at this point...enjoy the alpha, frens

[Anonymous No.52417706]

>>52417295
Solid

[Anonymous No.52417915]

>>52417701
Thanks for that
How much RLC are you holding bro?
And how much is the suicide stack?

[Anonymous No.52417934]

>>52417701
Fair points, i guess i can grab another bag of RLC during this dump..

[Anonymous No.52418303]

>>52417701
what's a make it stack for RLC?

[Anonymous No.52418355]

>>52416235
It's already been decided, mate - LUNC CHADS WE RISE.

[Anonymous No.52418379]

Looking into this cyberium thing, isn't the US gov in talks to ban PoW? Wouldn't that fk up cyberium?

[Anonymous No.52418418]

>>52416235
>Chainlink-like gem
top kek

[Anonymous No.52418493]

>>52416719
>>52416790
>>52416845
>>52418303


This is interesting, I wasn't aware of it. This isn't an ERC20, is it? I can't buy it on a DEX?

>>52417915
Under 10k is all I could spring for once I realized what it was, which was unfortunately a bit too late. Though I feel like had I realized earlier I would've been buying at much higher prices...so it probably evened out in the end.

I think about these things in terms of network ownership. 8700 RLC buys you 1/10,000 of the network (87,000,000 total RLC), and that's probably easily a make-it stack. 870 buys you 1/100,000 of the network, and that's probably a suicide stack. It's difficult to say what the eventual market cap could be for an entirely new category of technology like this, but a few thousand probably buys you a seat at the table over the next few years. Though I plan to sell into my other holdings as the party starts...I've learned from the horror stories here re people with massive 2018 Link stacks who didn't sell ANY from 0.20 to $50.

Decide how many you're willing to sell and how many you'll be holding for the long term. I'll probably never let my bag go under 2000 RLC no matter the price, but everything above that is fair game. Also worth keeping in mind that RLC isn't (natively) yield bearing like Chainlink will be when staking begins.

[Anonymous No.52418561]

>>52418493
MEXC and XT been in the works rolling with the big dogs for a looooomg time under wraps
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4219738
Here’s a paper they have don’t with Thomas Moser of Swiss national bank who works directly with the BIS on CBDC research

[Anonymous No.52418673]

>>52418561
They are also ISO 20022 compliant :)

[Anonymous No.52418725]

>>52416235
Saito

[Anonymous No.52418806]

>>52417915
>>52417934
>>52418303
I would also suggest that if you do decide to buy, hold your RLC in self custody if you use a CEX. I wouldn't trust a fast increase in price (i.e. a short squeeze) not to put certain CEXs in hot water. Better safe than sorry.

>>52418561
>>52418673
Interesting, thanks for this. Do they have a blockchain explorer of any kind? I'd like to take a look at the distribution, addresses etc before I decide whether or not to go in.

[Anonymous No.52418877]

>>52418806
https://explorer.cypherium.io/
It’s in a sorry state and needs updating I won’t lie but this is pre adoption

[Anonymous No.52418944]

>>52417701
Based. You should schizo post RLC here more often.

[Anonymous No.52418950]

>>52416713
And why does that matter?

[Anonymous No.52418967]

>>52417701
>>52418493
Do you think the utilities you mentioned would drive the price up enough?
>>52418877
>make cypherium global reserve currency
Damn bro that sounds hard to believe, as much as i like the project, it kinda tarnished their credibility a little. Am i stupid for thinking this? What do you think cypherium bro?

[Anonymous No.52419018]

>>52418967
It doesn’t really affect my thinking they clearly are working with central banks which is the main selling point for me

[Anonymous No.52419082]

>>52417018
So what is it?

[Anonymous No.52419137]

>>52416235
I have been around since 2017 (made 7figs this cycle), and I am dead sure it is going to be PoolTogether (POOL).

It will get on coinbase sometime next year most likely and will pull a LEND-like run and become one of the largest dApps. I am serious. Do with this info as you will - good luck, anons.

[Anonymous No.52419221]

>>52419018
That sounds great, what will make the coin pumo though, is it some smart tokenomics?

[Anonymous No.52419227]

>>52416778
>He still thinks crypto has a use case other than gambling
Doge is a good buy and will possibly reach $1 next bull.

[Anonymous No.52419255]

>>52419221
Pump*
For example chainlink has truly godly tokenomics, which really do pump when used. What about cypherium, how does its utility raise its price?

[Anonymous No.52419281]

>>52419221
The utility will make it pump the main idea is it will be used as gas for CBDC transactions hence the work with the central banks and FedNow. So as demand goes up with billions of anticipated transactions the price will have to go up to keep up with mining

[Anonymous No.52419329]

>tfw nobody mentioned your token

[Anonymous No.52419337]

>>52419281
But desu this is guess work on my part im in this coin based off the connections alone coupled with the bottomed out chart gn anons peace out

[Anonymous No.52419389]

>>52419281
>>52419337
Take care. Fow what it’s worth everything about this sounds good except the fact that cbdc’s are at least 3 years out and i’d rather buy something that will pump quicker

Still a good buy though, just that it’s gonna be profitable over 5 years maybe, if everything goes well

[Anonymous No.52419404]

>>52419389
FedNow launches in May or June the wait wont be that long to see what’s gonna happen

[Anonymous No.52419425]

>>52419404
Ok cheers gn anon

[Anonymous No.52419452]

>>52419404
What projects actually have a hand in fed now? Any web3 foundation members?
Or at least Link build program recipients?

[Anonymous No.52419513]

>>52418877
Checked and thank you. I guess one other question: can I self custody this or would I need to hold on MEXC or XT (assuming my shithole even lets me use either of those, which I'd have to look into). If I can't self custody the asset I'm basically just providing liquidity to whatever exchange I have to "hold" it on...

>>52418944
Probably, I spend enough time thinking about this stuff.

>>52418967
Sure, so the RLC token is the only thing that can be used to pay for services on the iExec platform. The buy-side pressure for the token itself will come from actual demand for the services (in addition to speculation, obviously).

A rough comparison would be the ETH token, which sees its buy-side pressure come partially (largely?) from the fact that the asset is needed to perform operations on the Ethereum chain. I don't particularly want to hold ETH...but I need it to do anything on the platform. If you're using the iExec network/market for anything, you'll need RLC itself as payment. If you're building a business model around services offered via iExec, you'll be needing to buy and spend RLC. This is real buy pressure, and not ponzi-nomics.

Lets say a government or legacy company wants to run its network via a decentralized confidential cloud computing network facilitated via iExec (and they would, unless you think they're actually fond of 'trusting' AWS or its equivalents with all their confidential data, as is currently the case). They have to be constantly buying RLC off the market to pay for these essential network services.

This is why you see anons here referring to it as "digital oil" and numbering their "barrels"; large entities will need the RLC token to power decentralized network infrastructure in the same way that large entities need oil to power their physical infrastructure

[Anonymous No.52419574]

>>52416235
>because we agreed upon discovering the best unpumped gem before it mooned
That's not why. It's because assblaster shilled the fuck out of it and answered any and all questions, then it was agreed upon. That is probably never going to happen again. All you'll get is pajeets and retards shilling shitcoins itt, sorry

[Anonymous No.52419628]

>>52416363
>Discarded, it's too high marketcap to buy even if it were good, same as the examples i've listed in OP
You do realize LINK has roughly a 200m mcap at 50c, right?

[Anonymous No.52419633]

>>52417701
>BNY Mellon, Nasdaq, Swift and other confirmed Link node operators
they run on R3's Corda, a private permissions chain. the DTCC's Project ION is already running in production.

[Anonymous No.52419644]

>>52416235
sylo stays streets ahead of chainlink. but bobos are not ready for this

[Anonymous No.52419702]

Initially decided to learn haskell for Dapps, but switch to Pact (KDA) as Cardano seems like vaporware.

https://medium.com/kadena-io/from-haskell-to-pact-my-journey-in-code-toward-a-more-stable-and-secure-environment-for-b06e9e3916fb

[Anonymous No.52419727]

Pnk kleros

Subjectivity in smart contracts. It's the next step after chainlink. If you still don't hold pnk I don't know what you've been thinking

[Anonymous No.52419766]

>>52419644
cant say no

[Anonymous No.52419842]

I can’t make up my mind between ETH and AVAX. Is vitalik going to come through with all this zk rollup shit as advertised or not? If he doesn’t then Avax is the buy of a lifetime. If he does then ETH is a black hole that sucks up everything.

[Anonymous No.52419845]

>>52419727
I still hold my PNK bag but I'm not feeling so good about it right now desu.

[Anonymous No.52419974]

>>52419574
GRT isn’t a shitcoin and I’m shilling it. Explain why it’s a bad choice other than muh marketcap

[Anonymous No.52420104]

>>52416719
Just read the actual bulletin from the Faster Payments Council and there was no mention at all for this jeet-coin. Unironicaly Ripple labs is a member and was mentioned and also Circle.
Stay away from the jeet couns freinds.

[Anonymous No.52420474]

>>52416235
tons of projects are more valuable than chainlink faggot. stop shilling this shit to us

[Anonymous No.52420503]

what do anons think about arbitrum linked coins - theres a few services popping up using the arbitrum network and they seem to be getting shilled on arbs twitter

[Anonymous No.52420548]

>>52416235
It needs to have a low supply. Any shitcoin with a total supply that exceeds millions shouldn't even be considered. That's a fucking bottomless pit.

[Anonymous No.52420582]

>>52420474
i'd take holoride over link in a heartbeat

[Anonymous No.52420619]

>>52420548
Doge to the moon unironicaly
YFI is probably a good buy but who knows no that Elon Musk decentralized edition left.

[Anonymous No.52420635]

Fuck I wish I got into GNS when it was around 25M mcap. FACK. GMX scares me because team is anon and they may just decide to move on onto another project before the next bullrun. And its already 300M mcap. Now way it can even 6x in a bear

[Anonymous No.52420693]

Here's what I'm eyeing right now. Also not pictured: Alchemy Pay.

Rate.

[Anonymous No.52420725]

>>52420635
what do we do fellow gay farmer bro. Hurts knowing I could’ve bought more around 0.70

I’m a 1k stacklet

[Anonymous No.52420731]

>>52416235
What about ICOracle, ticker is OT. It's a decentralized oracle on ICP. Meaning it's a much cheaper Chainlink on ICP web 3.0. Barely a month old, low market cap. I don't understand shit about the tech but let me paste the pasta general here:

>=================================
ICOracle is the first decentralized oracle network on the Internet Computer (basically Chainlink only on web 3.0)

Whitepaper: https://cfhuv-raaaa-aaaak-aczha-cai.raw.ic0.app/onepaper-draft.pdf

This above is an ICP link^

>but how do i buy it?
You need an ICP wallet, there are various options that also allow you to have an ICP identity, but the simplest anonymous and closest to an ETH wallet UI is plug wallet:
https://plugwallet.ooo/

>ok but what now?
You buy ICP from an exchange or peer to peer if you're a schizo, and load your wallet with it, watch out though!
*IMPORTANT*
Your wallet has two addresses, one principal and one account ID, to receive ICP or ICP tokens from an exchange or anything not compatible with plug, use your ACCOUNT ID, make sure to do test transactions, fees are very low on ICP

>ok but how do i buy it!?
https://avjzx-pyaaa-aaaaj-aadmq-cai.raw.ic0.app/ICDex/OT/ICP

Use it like you use your traditional CEX

>but muh fees
I already said it, ICP fees are incredibly low
_____

Yesterday sell wall at .0012 (430 pees) got BTFO. Now comfily sitting at .00167
Next stop; .00177
>================================
Full archived last thread: >>52402407

[Anonymous No.52420739]

>>52416235

[Anonymous No.52420745]

>>52420635
>may just decide to move on onto another project
Is this the technical term for "rugpull"?
These guys don't do "projects".

[Anonymous No.52420797]

>>52420745
> Is this the technical term for "rugpull"?
Essentially. Devs with skills get bored eventually and find some inspiration or see some new thing to capitalize on. With anon devs this can be done with zero guilt, i.e. nothing even remotely stopping them. Not saying they will rug but they will just have no incentives to try and grow it and a competitor will surely pass them by.

[Anonymous No.52420814]

>>52420725
I've been swing trading fren and unironically investing more money in the various lower mcap clones that I will use to purchase more GNS before GNS really takes off

[Anonymous No.52420857]

Avax and only avax. Simple as.

[Anonymous No.52420865]

>>52420104
Why would there be a mention of cypherium on FPC's shit?
I genuinely dont know so please explain.

[Anonymous No.52420910]

FIRO

[Anonymous No.52421215]

>>52416719
That page really doesnt prove anything. Anyone can slap their shit there.

[Anonymous No.52421280]

>>52420814
That may actually be a good idea

Mind spoonfeeding said coins?

[Anonymous No.52421335]

>>52421280
YDF - 8M
DXP (rebranding to VELA) - 3M

Managed to catch both at lows during the ftx crash. I'd wait a few days for lower prices. Looks like the market will be red again this week so perfect time to load up on these things then.

[Anonymous No.52421490]

>>52421335
much appreciated homie

[Anonymous No.52421588]

anyone who bought cypherium tried depositing from the wallet back to mexc

did I not use enough gas

[Anonymous No.52421596]

>>52421588
picrel

[Anonymous No.52421728]

>>52421588
Already said it's a jeet scam. You guys will never learn will you.

[Anonymous No.52421769]

>>52421728
nvm we good

[Anonymous No.52421787]

>>52421769

[Anonymous No.52421897]

>>52416235
Premia.
>proper utility of the token driving the price up
80% of protocol fees are distributed to stakers. vePremia is being released this month, allowing stakers to also direct liquidity emissions to whichever options pool they wish, along with general governance.
>legitimate team
White team consisting of several developers.
>low marketcap
$7m, easy 100x at minimum.
>ideally alongside it having great credibility
They are White and have been around for two years.
>it should not listed on a major exchange yet and thus will have a GUARANTEED huge listing pump due to its novelty to new retail money finding out about it through the new exchange listing
Not listed anywhere, nobody is talking about it.

[Anonymous No.52421903]

> Usually the way to find projects as valuable as Chainlink was for /biz/ in 2018

> Back in 2018 this board was flooded with Chainlink threads, because we agreed upon discovering the best unpumped gem before it mooned.

None of this is how it happened. Chainlink was spammed non-stop on biz since before the ICO block. In 2017.

[Anonymous No.52422455]

ctrl+f everest

[Anonymous No.52422847]

>>52420725
I've been swinging my gns stack waiting for a drop. It will drop

[Anonymous No.52423810]

>>52416235
Agreed on ICP. It's this cycle's LINK (about the same cmc position also as LINK in 2018)
I'd add Mina and Celo to the list as promising zk chains.

[Anonymous No.52424199]

I think ROSE is probably the best candidate at the moment for the next LINK.

[Anonymous No.52424217]

>le next link
can this meme die already? what happened to the next eth?

[Anonymous No.52424630]

>>52419727
Ooooooooo, wagmi pnk sisters
Also, where to buy?

[Anonymous No.52424667]

>>52421903
Yeah i know it was discovered and talked about since the ICO in 2017 but the board flooded with chainlink memes happened in 2018, and that's what i'm thinking we should seek, a coin so good we can create a cult around as we did with link back in the day

[Anonymous No.52424683]

>>52424217
link wasn't really known outside of /biz/, eth was widespread

[Anonymous No.52424723]

>>52416235
I think there's potential in Radix DLT.
It is listed on Bitfinex but has a pretty small market cap of $230m.
Has been in development for 9 years, sustained effort over a long time.
The three things I like are:
1) Decentralisation is important to them, the promise is that anyone will be able to run a node on low power machines
2) Sharding. I know, lots of people claim they are working on this too, that it's "right around the corner" but they have demonstrated prototypes, have a mathematical proof... meh. It might be true. If so they can achieve very high TPS, maintain privacy and decentralization. The trilemma. The comprimise is that Radix is not exactly a blockchain, it's some other structure
3) Scrypto language, allows people to make trusted, audited objects and functions which others on the network can then integrate into their code. Royalty mechanism to pay people if their code gets used. They demonstrated being able to write an equivalent of uniswap with 1 page of code.

FUD: the biggest (which saw here on biz) is that the founder, Dan Hughes, posted on blackhat forums in the 90's or early 2000's about affiliate marketing websites scammy sounding stuff. He has come out and responded to it, saying the forums were used by all kinds of legit people back then. Better to just read his response than have me paraphrase. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=419529.0

[Anonymous No.52424917]

>>52423810
no, link was like rank 100, it dropped outside the top 100 for awhile too and got fudded for it

as for answering OP, I'm an OG linker and looking at going incredible hard at a specific new token soon to be released, I value the project as a possible 50-100 billion market cap if they pull it off but I don't want to advertise what it is till I get a bag, sorry

[Anonymous No.52425094]

>>52416321
Please shut the fuck up. It's over.

[Anonymous No.52425457]

>>52424723
Forgot to say, ticker is XRD
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/radix-protocol/

[Anonymous No.52425463]

>>52424917
My man, remember when /biz/ was flooded with Chainlink threads back in the day?
Chainlink dumped from 50 cents to 20 cents, /biz/ doesn't have the power to influence price my man
Post the coin, it's not gonna make a difference in the price you're gonna accumulate at

[Anonymous No.52425493]

>>52416235
There is nothing. Chainlink is the next chainlink. It will stop being supressed eventually.

[Anonymous No.52425516]

>>52424199
Easily

[Anonymous No.52425643]

It’s PRQ
criminally undervalued

[Anonymous No.52425764]

>>52425493
Suppressed? What sorry? you mean the devs taking 5 years to release beta indie game dev staking while the russian kept dumping?

[Anonymous No.52425845]

Nillion

[Anonymous No.52425976]

>>52425463
okay I'll let you know because I think this thread will probably die soon anyway and I kinda already made it from link anyway so I'll be kind to biz

https://youtu.be/xfVtzuPWjUA?t=564

Krypton protocol - imo the uniswap killer, if they achieve what they set out to do then it's actually impossible for uniswap to compete because I doubt they would ever use chainlink + cefi collapse narrative so far this bear market + Krypton having chainlink support/connections and creating the first institutional level defi platform + mev resistance

also the founder seems very impressive, after he finishes his answer the other bozo's are in awe

Only issue is that the tokenomics are not released yet, hopefully it has some decent utility but I guess even uniswaps useless governance token is worth 5 billion, also framework ventures (early chainlink VC) and sony next are series 1 investors which is a good sign imo, they also won chainlink's hackathon in 2021 and have a full dox'ed team that look good

[Anonymous No.52425996]

>>52425976
Cheers mate, i'll look into it

[Anonymous No.52426425]

>>52424723
>>52425457
The marketcap is 500m. This is a scamcoin from 2013. Look at the volume and the chart. Theres a bunch of whales up 1000x from 2013 trapped in low liq that dump on every scam wick. Shit project

[Anonymous No.52426518]

>>52416397
Theyre in the build program we're already in

[Anonymous No.52426580]

>>52425976
I thought similar and also thought the founder looks like a serious dude. Only thing I dont like is the name, Krypton just sounds like such a fucking shitcoin

[Anonymous No.52426600]

>>52416235
Statera nigga. The team deploying the token is hardcore, hardcore so no rugpulls, no marketing, no shilling, even on /biz/, sub 500k cap, no one even knows this coin isn't dead.

[Anonymous No.52426727]

>>52425976
also>>52426518

[Anonymous No.52426818]

>>52425643
no its part of the heavy bag of a scam group that tries to make their bags look legit ITT

[Anonymous No.52426871]

Vet

[Anonymous No.52427406]

>>52416235
Good intentions op, sadly the board is way too infested with countless shills to have a proper conversation. Even what I will say next would be interpreted as shilling. Godspeed to y’all.m and have a look at Lithium Finance if you have the time.

[Anonymous No.52427578]

>>52427406
Godspeed

[Anonymous No.52427793]

>>52426600
I kept hearing about statera, i’ll look into it

[Anonymous No.52428051]

>>52416235
LCX

[Anonymous No.52428208]

>>52416845
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/51890634/#q51891038
You fucking jeet ass nigger. You didn't reply me the last time and have the nerve to post that scam thread here. kys Ranjesh

[Anonymous No.52428675]

>>52428208
The question I asked earlier in this thread being wouldn't the us gov currently in talks of banning PoW hurt Cypherium wasn't answered either. Also, CPH has a sht ton of coins that aren't in circulation yet (around 8bil). This sht will def get diluted soon.

[Anonymous No.52428810]

>>52416235
Aleph Zero
>slavs
>fundamentals
>institutional integration
about to get listed on kucoin

[Anonymous No.52429184]

>>52424917
Just like Aleph Zero now

[Anonymous No.52429391]

>>52416235
SMR
Shimmer

[Anonymous No.52429583]

>>52418355

Standard !

[Anonymous No.52429914]

So far from this thread the only thing that really piqued my interest was Everest and Cypherium

[Anonymous No.52431235]

BAT. You all use Brave anyway, and if you don't already you will be using Brave search soon. It just makes sense. .20 cents and $300m market cap. Tens of millions of daily Brave users and hundreds of millions of queries per month on their search engine and haven't monetized search with ads yet.

[Anonymous No.52431354]

>>52429914
Everest is a scam

[Anonymous No.52432301]

Beam privacy

[Anonymous No.52433301]

>>52431354
Possible, the backing they have is only superficial if i recall correctly. Can any everest id fag rebuke my claim with some factual legitimacy?

[Anonymous No.52435009]

I bought the cph ico and I can say I'm more financially bored with it than I was with link which I also bought around the same time. I've sold link since though and I'm still holding my ico bag, hopefully that chink sky wil pull a sergey

[Anonymous No.52435078]

>>52435009
Damn that’s a long hold. Hopefully it pays off for you

[Anonymous No.52435156]

>>52416235

[Anonymous No.52435191]

Black Markets will flourish.

Someone post the XMR meme

[Anonymous No.52435249]

>>52416235
NICE TRY NULINKER. I WILL CONTINUE TO COOM LINK AND NEVER SELL IT.

[Anonymous No.52435344]

>>52429914
>cypherium
Nice inflation faggot

[Anonymous No.52435469]

>>52424199
>ROSE is the new link
that was last pump's narrative

[Anonymous No.52436154]

>>52416235 (OP)
cweb

[Anonymous No.52436307]

Kleros (PNK) unironically, it is Vitalik's pick.

[Anonymous No.52437543]

>>52416235
>Ideal candidate: proper utility of the token driving the price up, legitimate team, low marketcap, and ideally alongside it having great credibility - it should not listed on a major exchange yet and thus will have a GUARANTEED huge listing pump due to its novelty to new retail money finding out about it through the new exchange listing.
Ghost is the most undervalued privacy play. Currently the Ghost blockchain is capable of 32 ring signatures (XMR is 16 max) and DEX compatible. It offers both private and public tx without compromising privacy. In terms of development, Ghost team is one of the most active in the space, take a look at their medium article updates. One of the only things missing from making their current privacy stack perfect is dandelion++ which has been implemented once but was unstable. Team is currently working on a reimplementation. It’s POS so very fast transactions using low amount of energy. You can run a coldstaking node on a raspberry pi for an entire year for a few bucks. They released GhostVault which allows you to stake anonymously. Team released a wallet on telegram called GhostPay so you can send public/anon coins on-chain using telegram. They are currently testing the first crypto p2p AES256 encrypted Chat protocol called GhostChat. That one is going to be nuts. There’s a lot more than even what I have wrote here. I believe the /biz/ hivemind could make Ghost 10x-100x. The tech is legit. Good Community and team. Even just the branding and name alone is fucking cool.

[Anonymous No.52438438]

>>52416235
>Coreto (COR)
If there is one thing that everyone in the normie world has and will always talk about is trust, reputation and accountability.
There have always been (shitty) attempts at reputation building tools (like/dislikes, reviews, stars and whatnot), but none of those have been more than lazy attempts.
These guys are building a decentralized reputation system that (they claim) can be added to any online platform, and can track online reputation anywhere on the internet.
They also have their own platform targeting the crypto scene, where they also showcase the reputation system in action.
The token is used as a payment & reward currency for both the platform and the reputation system, with many planned use cases (only one available so far besides trading and staking - look up "staking of opinion pool")
Project has been in alpha for more than a year and has basically done no real marketing or big exchange listings.
There are a few other projects out there working on reputation systems, bot all of them are niche targeted, while Coreto aims to be an all encompassing reputation framework.
It's gone mostly ignored by /biz/ so far, but I think it's time for it to hit the spotlight.
Look it up.

[Anonymous No.52438507]

The fact that every answer in this thread is garbage, makes me think the answer is still chain link

[Anonymous No.52438658]

>>52438507
Looking that way, yeah.

[Anonymous No.52438772]

>>52438658
>trust
>reputation
>>52438438
I rest my case

[Anonymous No.52438854]

>>52438772
Coreto hasn't been ignored, there have been plenty of threads on it. It's just too much of a shitcoin to be taken seriously as far as I remember (haven't looked into their progress in the last 6-8 months). Isn't it close to ATL at the moment? Might be worth looking into it.

[Anonymous No.52439062]

Only good answer is Aleph Zero.

This isn't a team of developers trying something, it's a fucking academic paper with private smart contracts and working blockchain, with extremely small fees (0.0001$) and near-instant confirmation.

[Anonymous No.52439173]

>>52433301
What do you mean their backing is only superficial ? Explain yourself ? Example ?

[Anonymous No.52439201]

>>52439062
Maybe don't wait until its trending on cg trending list before opening your mouth about it? No one is buying a pumped higher mcap coin when its at the peak of popularity.

[Anonymous No.52439302]

>>52438854
the price is shit rn, and so is the volume
but the tech has been progressing nicely desu
the only problem I see is they have a small team and I'm guessing it's because they haven't secured any big funding so far and they're moving kinda slow
but I have a bag and I'll ride it out

[Anonymous No.52439356]

teritori - one of the first nft marketplaces on cosmos network
fdv is kinda high(700mil), but its literally only listed on osmosis
cant be bothered to explain the details, but staking apr is currently 400%(not apy)

[Anonymous No.52439648]

>>52439062
>Only good answer was Aleph Zero.
As >>52439201 said, you are late to the party.

>>52439302
Yeah it's more of a lottery ticket to me. Still worth taking a look to see how much they have advance. Thanks for the reminder.

[Anonymous No.52439714]

>>52416235
The evil Jews have spoken are for one and part of their uncircumcised brethren and can tell you now that FTX is not a poor choice to invest it's now at an all-time low?? Do you really need me to hold your hand!?

[Anonymous No.52439718]

>>52416441
Found it, thanks. Don't post charts 1:1 anymore, very searchable now with ai.

[Anonymous No.52440109]

>>52439718
What is it then?

[Anonymous No.52440152]

>>52439718
Yeah I found it too with my AI. Let's compare results. Who did you have?

[Anonymous No.52440163]

>>52416235
ULX but unironically, ultra fast layer 1 with cap under 150m and seriously connected team

[Anonymous No.52440253]

>>52416235
>The real 2022/2023 /biz/ Chainlink-like gem
It's KAS (Kaspa). Don't listen to the KDA seethers. They hate that anon are working this out. They're trying to shake you out of it.

[Anonymous No.52440362]

>>52416235

Pawtocol general >>52435870

This is our new chance

[Anonymous No.52440498]

ICORACLE is the play right now, whales are giga acooming right now, it’s on a little ICP exchange (lighthouse) but once it blows up its gonna be fun, buy it and throw it on your plug wallet and just stay comfy this winter

[Anonymous No.52440499]

>>52416235
Everest ID, nothing else out there even comes close. They do on-chain identity that incorporates biometrics, but the users are self sovereign so they own their own data and companies/governments can't access it without consent or valid court orders. Linkpool has already integrated their API and their Chainlink node will be launching soon and is going to be the only identity node on the network.

1 LINK = 1 ID

[Anonymous No.52440950]

>>52416235
Honestly there were some good attempts by biz at snooping for small caps during the last bull run. But as a next chainlink? nah.
CargoX is being used in Egypt for Bill of lading, but tokenomics got fucked in the middle. Signata has an interesting use, got nothing bad to say about Tim.

[Anonymous No.52441064]

>>52440499
Answer this >>52433301

[Anonymous No.52441081]

>>52439173
I mwan the “backing” they have is just hot air

[Anonymous No.52441205]

>>52416790
just realize that the Fed will accept anyone who qualifies as a service provider for fednow. It means the service provider will integrate its solutions with fednow or build upon fednow services. It absolutely does not mean fednow will incorporate parts of the service provider's products.
You kids need to spend ten years in banking and then twenty in IT.

[Anonymous No.52441492]

>>52441064
What is the question even? Their partnerships are all rock solid if that is what you mean. The Chainlink partnership in particular is deepening considerably as is evidenced by recent developments and they handle onboarding for all of Oracle's banking clients. This is no different from everyone who fudded about Chainlink's partnerships as fake or exaggerated even though they were getting positive attention from MIT Press etc in late 2018. It's just that with Everest the number of anons who understand the tech and implications are smaller because there's no assmaster spoonfeeding threads this time and none of us care if people can't see something that's inevitable.

[Anonymous No.52441547]

>>52426600
>>52427793
lol

[Anonymous No.52442619]

>>52441492
Name the top 3 backing points that give everest legitimacy please, outside of chainlink

[Anonymous No.52443010]

>>52442619
Only project with a currently functioning product that solves fundamental identity by integrating biometrics into a blockchain protocol, currently the only service in crypto offering identity/KYC compliance that regulators will accept because they have an MFSA license, running access for all of Oracle's banking clients who want to use blockchain services are some things that stand out to me.

[Anonymous No.52443031]

>>52416715
Based.

[Anonymous No.52444157]

>>52416235
ICP is at 1 billion MC and will hit 200 billion in the next bull market minimum. (200x) Trash projects, scams, vaporware, ponzis of all types are being flushed away and that money is going to consolidate into real projects, with real tech, and real cryptographers; not a bunch of fiverr jeets coding out of the back of a toiletless shit shack.
ICP is one of the most well connected projects with the most innovative and ground breaking tech out there. BTC integration is coming along nicely, various dexes and swaps are coming to life, NFT's and all the typical scams are being built up too.
"The Sister Network of Ethereum" as Vitalik once referred to it as.

[Anonymous No.52444187]

>>52444157
And don't forget FTX/SBF pumped ICP on it's launch to ridiculously high levels just so he could short it and paint an ugly ass chart and make it look like a pump and dump scam. They didn't want legitimate competition to Solana. Now that that bitch tit fake vegan (seriously who fakes being a vegan) faggot ass is now bankrupt and not shorting ICP, ICP chads will have our day in the sun.

[Anonymous No.52444197]

>>52443010
biometrics are a really shitty identifier that no respectable security engineer would ever implement

[Anonymous No.52444335]

>>52418303
RLC is building by offering security and AI solutions, combining blockchain, I also like the growth from payment projects. They might be the next big thing in the space

[Anonymous No.52444394]

>>52443010
I have no idea what you mean by "working products." Recently, a city in Switzerland began accepting crypto as payment, and Travala has followed suit. All praise is due to the payment gateways xpress and utk. I see this as functioning products

[Anonymous No.52444711]

>>52444394
with the increasing regulations, it's safe to say that crypto would gain more attention, and payment projects would carry the day

[Anonymous No.52444743]

>>52416235
the next cash cow is going to come from payment projects, I hear binance pay now accepts coti, travala accepts xpress, and more payment solutions are beginning to standardize. best time to get into them is now

[Anonymous No.52444754]

Truebit

[Anonymous No.52444840]

>>52431235

This one checks all the boxes basically. Never overhyped so the top didn't blow off. Legit team, low marketcap, profitable and functioning product. Circulating supply maxed. Balances on exchanges thinning.

Its the second largest crypto application by users, first being binance, third being coinbase. Its search engine is at 22% of the volume of Duckduckgo which makes $100m+ a year in revenue. Product still has tons of room to grow and marketing hasn't kicked off yet.

In 2017-2018 it was basically a choice between BAT or Chainlink as the bear market gainer. Link pulled ahead. BAT would be easily to form a narrative as people are looking for legitimacy and real projects. Easy 100x if it pulled a chainlink tier run. You wont get a meme tier "exchange listing pump" instead you will have a way for any normie to buy it anywhere because its on every single exchange and even places like grayscale.

[Anonymous No.52444896]

>>52444711
Regulations, if well implemented can lead to higher investor confidence, which could draw in more long-term investors like myself who oppose that earlier

[Anonymous No.52444899]

>>52444840
I still vote that blockchain projects and payment solutions are gonna lead the charge for the next pump. it would be just like the metaverse days

[Anonymous No.52444936]

>>52444896
crypto would become more taxed. pumps wouldn't happen as they used to anymore. the only upside is that investor confidence would rise too.

[Anonymous No.52445105]

>>52444899
Pretty sure brave is building a payments solution into the browser. The "pay with BAT button" was always on the roadmap. Not sure if it will ever be done but they also have a wallet with payment processors built in thats currently working. They basically have two ways to skin the cat.

[Anonymous No.52445109]

>>52444899
Metaverse is still evolving i believe is the future and has the potential to impact various business. You can unlock infinite possibilities, and communicate quickly too

[Anonymous No.52445463]

>>52429914
Unfortunatly for me I bought into the Cypherium ICO. Thankfully only a few k but I consider it burnt money. Just go on the telegram to see how childish the ceo is. Maybe it goes somewhere but Im not hopeful. Who knows. DYOR.

[Anonymous No.52446430]

>>52443010
Fair enough

[Anonymous No.52446559]

>>52425845
This project is based but as a VC I will enjoy doomping on you

[Anonymous No.52446649]

So what's the verdict boys?

[Anonymous No.52447102]

>>52446649
from reading the whole thread desu there is nothing that really jumps out at me. like when i first saw chainlink on here i got like a feeling that this was interesting even though im too low iq to really understand all the tech side of it. But everything ive seen shilled so far is like interesting but there is no narrative, like. Whats the narrative going to be which kickstarts the next bull run? because so far everything ive seen just isnt that compelling i think

[Anonymous No.52447166]

>>52446649
dog coins

[Anonymous No.52447236]

>>52446649
Cypherium is the only one that sparked my curiousity here. So far I'm undecided about the project.
What I have gathered:
>They clearly have connections to the banking industry and have written papers about CBDCs and possible platforms for them
>They have been selected as a service provider for FedNow instant payments
>BIS especially mentioned that they used HotStuff consensus mechanism in their mBridge CBDC pilot which is the same mechanism Cypherium uses and the CEO claims that he has presented their tech to BIS and that they were impressed with it


Some criticism:
>Their website sucks. Looks awful and literally has broken links
>It's hard to find anything on their team and people behind the company. For some reason they don't give that information on their website
>Tokenomics don't look too great as of now. On the other hand, token price is always based on hype only so it might pump anyways
>Even though they are listed as a service provider for FedNow and have connections to the people exploring CBDCs, there's really no guarantee that their blockchain will be used at all in any of these services
>As of now it seems like their blockchain isn't used at all for anything

I will probably keep researching this later but won't be buying a bag for now. If anyone else has any interesting info about Cypherium, please share.

[Anonymous No.52447493]

hyperdex.finance

No IDO yet but looks promising to me...

[Anon No.52448078]

Yo Anons i know im a bit late, but you should check out morphswap (MS) (Not the same as morpheus!), they are trying to build a cross chain decentralized exchange using link protocols. It was mentioned in a tweet from chainlink.
Marketcap is still under 1M, its only a few days old.

[Anonymous No.52448236]

>>52416235
You don't think a purge of shit coins will inflate
>GMX, Chainlink, Oasis (Rose), HNT, ICP

[Anonymous No.52448333]

obvious pnk you fucking retards

[Anonymous No.52448605]

>>52447236
https://xangle.io/en/project/CPH/profile
Go to the profile tab

[Anonymous No.52448854]

Oasis

[Anonymous No.52449290]

>>52426600
checked

[Anonymous No.52449937]

>>52416235
ATOM. JUNO.

[Anonymous No.52450007]

>>52416235
The play is not to find the 100-1000x gem but to just ape in boat loads of cash into something you know will 10-20x.

Chainlink, ICP, GMX are all great coins that can easily pull of a 10-20x, just invest enough into them so that you can make it with a 10-20x, if you don’t have enough then just use leverage

[Anonymous No.52450022]

>>52416235
Saito

[Anonymous No.52450026]

>>52426600
Statera can easily go 100x since the current mcap is small.

[Anonymous No.52450075]

>>52440499
The best fud for Everest is their product is simply shit, don’t believe me? Try it out yourself

[Anonymous No.52450166]

>>52449937
Very high cap, LOOP, IBAT, ZEC

[Anonymous No.52450221]

>>52450166
>LOOP
Their NFT marketplace is dope, It's on JUNO, I have a few of it.

[Anonymous No.52450260]

>>52450166
DeFi, metaverse and privacy. The diversification of this bag is good.

[Anonymous No.52450367]

>>52447236
My main criticism with Cypherium is about the supply

8 bil + ready to get released on the market and current circulating supply is around 500 mil
What's up with that?

Cypherium bro you still around? Anyone else who knows what the fuck is up with this?

[Anonymous No.52450402]

OP here btw

>>52446649
People seem to agree on rose oasis, even though i put it in the OP post because of the high marketcap
It is indeed one of the best ones since it partnered with Meta so it has uncrushable credibility, but it needs to go lower to fit the marketcap needs

[Anonymous No.52450410]

>>52450402
>Meta
>uncrushable credibility
kek

[Anonymous No.52450454]

>>52450007
That's a fair point as well, but you're sleeping much better if you buy the bottom on a good low marketcap one instead of worrying about leverage liquidation (talking from experience). Also, there just has to be a legitimate lower marketcap coin with great upward potential other than those coins.
Still, a good point to be made

[Anonymous No.52450501]

>>52450410
I hope zuckerberg dies and i don't have any social media at all, but you can't deny that any globohomo partnership is fruitful for any project it partners with

Btw, after this thread gets filled i'll make a new one with all the worthy coins that were mentioned in this thread and we'll have a starting point to sift through and pick the best one(s)

[Anonymous No.52450546]

>>52450367
huge part of the total supply is reserved for (((them)))

[Anonymous No.52450556]

>>52450367
Looking at the blockchain these wallets haven’t been touched. The remains percentage will be for miners.

[Anonymous No.52450577]

>>52416235
Aleph Zero, everything else is a vapor wave

[Anonymous No.52450593]

Morphswap. Check their whitepaper and tell me it won’t be big. They are also joining chainlink build program soon

[Anonymous No.52451036]

>>52450546
>>52450556
Yeah so based on what info we got until this point about cypherium i believe it's a good buy but long term it's gonna get shaky because of this distribution, 22% allocation for the team doesn't sound like a project that will get to the top 20 projects
and more importantly i don't think the federal reserve would let the team (a few random guys) of cypherium become so incredibly rich through this if that was indeed the trajectory of cypherium, but then again who knows
On top of that, what the fuck is up with the marketing/operations allocation, 20%? So the team basically has 42% of supply under their personal control? That's kinda fucked up... this has to be said, you feel my cypherium bro? It's the biggest fud for this project

[Anonymous No.52451096]

>>52451036
Like the other anon said the 22% is for (((them))) hence the contractors. I see what you are saying though in the end it’s your choice. Pantera capital hasn’t dumped their stack yet so we will see. The risk/reward seems good for me especially since the chart has basically bottomed out

[Anonymous No.52451231]

>>52451096
Yeah i don't disagree, it's a great buy, just had to point out the biggest flaw i could find before committing to a life changing investment either way kek

[Anonymous No.52451266]

i am not sharing bc i genuinely dislike the people here and I want you to fail

[Anonymous No.52451296]

>>52451266
Ok fag, enjoy your misery

[Anonymous No.52451361]

DEUS. Leverage trade up to 1500x on any asset, cross chain. Brings deep tardfi orderbook liquidity on chain to achieve this. Look at the low mc and weep. Revenue sharing too. Thus is like gmx on steroids.

[Anonymous No.52451772]

>>52417454
>Everyone should have a bag.
no
>What are you gonna lose? $100?
yes

[Anonymous No.52451861]

>>52451361
Put it on the radar, will look into it

[Anonymous No.52452011]

>>52451036
By (((them))) I don't mean the team, rather the central banks that will adopt cypherium

[Anonymous No.52452030]

>>52451096
This

[Anonymous No.52452034]

>>52438658
how do we chart the average IQ on /biz/ over time, and short it? im thinking that might be the next chainlink

[Anonymous No.52452747]

>>52417454
Ain't $100 some money, ohh c'mon fag, stop playing, RLC is a good buy no doubt with multiples making potentials but then in addition to that, ama give it up to Sylo, Chr and Rowan.

[Anonymous No.52452892]

>>52416235
Raiblocks

[Anonymous No.52452989]

you fuckin retards talm bout muh digital oil when TRUEBIT makes RLC obsolete. THE REAL ANSWER IS PRQ AND TRUEBIT. END OF. SIMPLE AS

[Anonymous No.52453015]

>>52452892
Now known as Nano. Supply is non-inflationary and the devs only kept 5%. Same amount that Satoshi mined for himself. Fully distributed. No more will ever exist than do now. 133 million in total.

[Anonymous No.52453041]

>>52452892
Fits the eco-friendly model, has zero tx fees, and is so light weight that the network can and has been supported by hobbyists. Just like how BTC started.

[Anonymous No.52453098]

>>52452892
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKt9KepQQF4

Now sitting as the world's first certified global currency. Ticker XNO and currency symbol Ӿ.

[Anonymous No.52453137]

>>52452892
One can wonder.

[Anonymous No.52453148]

>>52416235
It's unironically HEX, but no one wants to hear it

[Anonymous No.52453225]

>>52452892
That is all. Good luck.

[Anonymous No.52454341]

>>52451861
Which radar are you referring to?

[Anonymous No.52454622]

Hahaha the only answer is taraxa, mainnet conversion coming, halborn audit in progress, herbswap ready to launch, github on fire, no pajeets, only harward chinks as CEOs. And its at fucking 3mil mcap hahaha. Noone WI actually check it out which will let me and the bros accumulate. A legit x1000 gem in the bullrun

[Anonymous No.52455360]

>>52453225
Useless reddit coin that didn't really outperform last year either.

[Anonymous No.52455469]

>>52444754
spoonfeed trubit im intrested

[Anonymous No.52457511]

>>52424917
Why did you waste your time writing this? What a fag.

[Anonymous No.52457668]

This was already decided on.

[Anonymous No.52457755]

>>52453225
nano a useless POS, stop shilling this trash

[Anonymous No.52457818]

Kleros pnk

[Anonymous No.52458013]

>>52424667
Why not HBAR? It's not hard to see it's ties to the US military and the cult of saturn

We're gonna be buying adrenochrome with this stuff

[Anonymous No.52459003]

>>52416235
BTR (bitrue token) DYOR

[Anonymous No.52459055]

>>52450577
Wrong.

Kaspa > Aleph Zero

[Anonymous No.52459062]

>>52457755
>>52455360
fuck yourself faggot shills, we are done with VC funded bullshit. Its time to return to the roots of crypto. KYS you stupid kike.

[Anonymous No.52459443]

>>52454341

I'll make a new thread when this one is over and enuntiate all the best coins mentioned in this thread, then we'll simmer down to the best of the best

[Anonymous No.52459452]

>>52459062
and what are the roots of crypto? explain

[Anonymous No.52459480]

>>52419842
ETH and Vitalik are going to have an FTX / LUNA style meltdown. Anyone paying close attention can spot it.

[Anonymous No.52459545]

>>52419513
I have 37K RLC. Do I need more becuase or your faggot thread?

[Anonymous No.52460848]

Looking at this thread one last time before it dies, cypherium, everest, and nillion piqued my interest

[Anonymous No.52461482]

>>52460848
a few more probably, rlc, and other low mcap shit defi

[Anonymous No.52462230]

>>52444197
Ok retard, that's why the government already uses them so extensively, because they're shit identifiers.

>>52444394
Re-read what I wrote then, because I said they're the only project out there with a working product that provides fundamental identity as opposed to something like encrypted credential sharing.

>>52447236
The reason Cypherium isn't going to win the identity arms race is precisely because of what you mentioned, their blockchain is shit and isn't used for anything other than POC project with big institutions that are throwing a few hundred thousand at them and then tying up their engineering team in something that has a major chance of not panning out. I was personally fudded out of ever buying any when I saw one of the Linkpool devs shitting all over one of their smart contracts on github. Plus, their product is still just credential sharing that relies on legacy documents primarily, which is still too easy to exploit.

[Anonymous No.52462233]

>>52416397
Is this the same as old school Bitcoin Mycelium, or just someone who stole the name?

[Anonymous No.52462297]

>>52416235
It's Fringe Finance but you all wanna get rich over night.

[Anonymous No.52462812]

Its GNS you tards.

[Anonymous No.52462827]

>>52416235
>ICP

Into the trash this entire thread goes. Full of shills and morons. See ya

[Anonymous No.52463316]

>>52450007
I don't have $200k just ready to deploy into a crypto

[Anonymous No.52463706]

>>52462827
Care to explain why vitalik said icp is the biggest eth competitor? Go fuck yourself retard

[Anonymous No.52463725]

>>52462827
He said it's too high mcap

[Anonymous No.52464107]

>>52462230
Some other things to consider:
>Their github is completely dead. No development whatsoever
>The New York Fed just anonunced CBDC pilot powered by SETL & Digital Asset. SETL claims to process 30 000tps which is way more than Cypherium. Also their team looks way more professional than just a random chink who claims to have tech for world reserve currency
>BSN recently dropped Cypherium from their partners list

Yea I think I will stay out of this.

https://www.newyorkfed.org/aboutthefed/nyic/facilitating-wholesale-digital-asset-settlement
https://setl.io/portl/#core-ledger
https://bsnbase.io/g/main/serviceNetworkLeague

[Anonymous No.52464185]

>>52463706
Because Vitalik says weird things occasionally. Always has.

[Anonymous No.52464191]

>>52416235
GMX will be 10 billions marketcap, it generates MORE FEES than any protocol minus Ethereum and Uniswap. Think about it hard.
You're looking at a x30 from this point AT LEAST.
Don't fuck it up and use your braincells.

t. OG linky who sold his stack at the peak of 2020 defi bubble

[Anonymous No.52464220]

>>52416246
RLC is a long con, they have developed nothing in 5 years anhave no users, they spend as little as possible and the plan of the boomer CEO is to live forever on the hundreds of millions they have from their ICO. This is the worst token you can buy, 0 drive to succeed reflected by high employee turnover.
Arguably one of the worst tokens you can buy.

[Anonymous No.52464233]

>>52450007
>The play is not to find the 100-1000x gem but to just ape in boat loads of cash into something you know will 10-20x.
>10-20x

Why the fuck would you not just buy Bitcoin or ETH and wait a few years at this point?

[Anonymous No.52464425]

>>52424917
any hint? pls ser

[Anonymous No.52464438]

>>52428051
why

[Anonymous No.52464519]

>>52464220
I bought RLC 2 days ago and then sold for a 5% profit after seeing it constantly being shilled in random threads like a jeetcoin. Thanks for the profits.

[Anonymous No.52464577]

>>52444157
why did ftx have to do them so dirty.

[Anonymous No.52464586]

>>52444754
why
are you btcfundmanager?

[Anonymous No.52464657]

>>52450007
can you teach me leverage? i'll pay you

[Anonymous No.52464734]

Request

Those who know, know.

[Anonymous No.52465234]

>>52419137
>PoolTogether (POOL)
I remember POOL from back in 2021. Not because I bought it but because it was the main competitor to Ladyluck (LUCK) which ended up getting rugged after a few weeks kek. I'll look into it later on

[Anonymous No.52465308]

>>52416235
>The real 2022/2023 /biz/ Chainlink-like gem
pic related. You niggers know it to be true

[Anonymous No.52465403]

>>52421335
Nice, I also put about 50% of my GNS into DXP just so I can put the profits back into GNS and increase my stack. I'm hoping for a 5x at least once it launches in December, 10x still easy from this mcap if it catches some traction.

[Anonymous No.52465417]

>>52416235
fantom

[Anonymous No.52465946]

>>52426600
>>52427793
>>52441547
>>52449290
>>52450026