[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 6 KB, 208x242, Chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51483584 No.51483584 [Reply] [Original]

calls itself "decentralized". pure hypocrisy and corruption and centralization.

>> No.51483593
File: 29 KB, 400x400, comf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51483593

>>51483584
>when the final remaining cope is just seething at reality

>> No.51483622
File: 377 KB, 512x512, 1663327729509860.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51483622

Can some fucking linkie tell me what happens to my link if ETH were to go into the shitter?

Does that make my ERC20 linkies pretty much useless?

Fucking nigger linkmarines. ANSWER ME.

>> No.51483658

>>51483593
nice projection copper

>> No.51483725
File: 444 KB, 220x194, tenor.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51483725

>>51483658
>copper

>> No.51483736

>>51483725
the one who copes

>> No.51483750

>>51483622
Sell your 50 Link you retarded nufag nigger.

Blockchain agnostic.

>> No.51483916

>>51483750
>Blockchain agnostic
>ERC20 token

Fucking retard

>> No.51483926
File: 152 KB, 750x383, 1615710664382.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51483926

>>51483584
into the trash it goes

>> No.51483942

>NNOOOOO DON'T BUY IT STOP IT STOP IT STOP IT

bought more

>> No.51483973

>>51483584
Link isn't a governance token, ownership percentage has nothing to do with de/centralization.

>> No.51483991
File: 197 KB, 393x393, 1620147828627.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51483991

>>51483584
we know

>> No.51484018

>>51483916
ERC677 akshually

>> No.51484056

>>51483926
It's not even a secret. The entire thing is just 1 company, and 1 single person the head.

>> No.51484065

>>51483926
Top 5% of fiat holders own 60% of the supply. Link was available for everyone and anyone around the world to purchase at sub 50 cent prices for two years. Seeing as it isn't a currency and instead is infrastructure, everyone would expect the distribution to heavily favor early investors who took the risk of betting on Link before it became a 100% fact that Chainlink will hit 1000 dollars and flip ETH. Better luck next time!

>> No.51484070

>>51483942
cope

>> No.51484078

>>51484070
bought more

>> No.51484080

>>51483973
> the ENTIRE thing being 1 single company and 1 single person the head of it with 60% of everything, is irrelevant.
cope to the extreme

>> No.51484090

>>51483916
You’re so stupid it hurts anon. Please sell your LINK

>> No.51484091

>>51483991
so you admit to be either paid shills, or directly working for the company.
good to know so people know who they are listening to.

>> No.51484104

>>51484065
What "early investors"? The entire thing RIGHT NOW is owned by 60% by 1 single company of 1 single CEO having 100% of the shares.
cope at levels we didn't t think possible.

>> No.51484116

>>51484091
i work for chainlink labs and so do you

>> No.51484118

>>51484078
cope more.

>> No.51484133

>>51484116
you are the shill, so we know who works for the centralized scam.

>> No.51484156

>>51484133
checked, and fully agreed fellow colleague. all of these coppers are seething right now

>> No.51484165

>>51484080
Anon, it's not a governance token.

>> No.51484209

>>51484104
And so it is for all early giants in the making. Over 50% of Apple, microsoft, Tesla, google, facebook, etc were owned by their respective CEOs before and even for a time after IPO. Early investors who took the risk to buy into Chainlink sub 50 cents, prior to mainnet, prior to google and swift announcements were heavily rewarded. The people who sat back waiting for a more surefire investment got left behind. Sergey used to hold 100% of the supply, and 3 years after mainnet it's already 40% less. Pretty great distribution so far, considering everyone knew that the team would continue to hold the majority of tokens until the more developed features of the network are polished and released with no error.
Seems like you're the one coping

>> No.51484211

>>51483584
When staking is released then that will change. LINK holders will be chasing whoever is offering the highest dividends to lend their tokens to.

>> No.51484221

>>51483622
Just sell your link you massive newfaggot, I'll tell you what ETH dropped $350 dollars and link gained a dollar so what faggot?

>> No.51484311

>>51484133
>you are the shill
He has 2 posts, you have 10 including the creation of this very thread.

>> No.51484352

>>51483584
there once was a fag named OP
who fudded the linkies with glee
he sold at the bottom
because the jews got em
now he posts like a pajeet for free

>> No.51484510

>>51484165
Who gives a fuck? It's a security either way.

>> No.51484532

>>51484510
Yes goy, the securities act of 1933 encompasses all of modern technology and everything after it goy.

>> No.51484587

>>51484510
If the Chainlink team was never seen or heard explicitly telling people they would make the token price go up, then it's not a security.

>> No.51484642

>>51484209
>Sergey used to hold 100% of the supply, and 3 years after mainnet it's already 40% less. Pretty great distribution so far,
This fucking shit is a security. You can't say shit like that about this coin and be bullish with any cursory understanding of securities law.

>> No.51484657

>>51484642
Fuck off you tranny fudding faggot I've seen you posting all fucking day long, you wake up this morning and shit yourself or did you get liquidated shorting link?
Which one is it?

>> No.51484664

>>51484642
>selling things for money makes it a security
lel

>> No.51484688

>>51484642
>claims to be an expert in securities law
>doesn't understand EXPECTATION OF PROFIT IN A SHARED ENTERPRISE

kek

>> No.51484695

>>51484587
You don't understand the first thing about securities law. The real reason nobody touches this piece of dog shit is because it's a security and Sergey has offered and sold hundreds of millions worth of securities without jumping through all the SEC hoops.

>> No.51484708

>>51484532
>>51484587
>>51484657
>>51484664
>>51484688
Oh it seems I struck a nerve D=

>> No.51484718

>>51484708
>I was just pretending to be retarded!

>> No.51484721

>>51484695
It's not a security because Sergey never said "we will make the token price go up" (i.e. expectation of profit from the efforts of a promoter or third party).
Meaning it does not pass the Howey test.

>> No.51484731

>>51484352
Love this.

>> No.51484747

>>51484718
>>51484721
>certificate of interest or participation in any profit-sharing agreement, collateral-trust certificate, preorganization certificate or subscription, transferable share, investment contract, voting-trust certificate, certificate of deposit for a security,
Hmm.jpg

>> No.51484776

>>51484721
Sergey doesn't have to personally promote it, it's been marketed by the "early adoptees" who Sergey personally gave tokens to. You fucking moron.

>> No.51484802

>>51484747
Are you trying to tell us that phrase is the definition of a security?
Protip: when the definition of a term contains the term itself, it's not the definition.

>>51484776
>Sergey doesn't have to personally promote it
Yes he does.
If what you say were true, then you could fuck over your local grocery store by reselling onions with the promise of profit.

>> No.51484832

>>51484747
nevermind, you're not pretending you're actually retarded

>> No.51485164

>>51483593
Desu

>> No.51485418

>>51484209
Back then QNT was sub 50 cents, too. It pumped to mid triple digits last year and is still sitting at over $100 even now. How anyone can still defend LINK's pathetic price action is really beyond me. 7 fucking dollars after 5 years.

>> No.51485443

>>51484802
That is literally the definition in the 1933 act you fucking retard
>>51484802
That's not what is happening at all. We aren't talking about onions you fucking dishonest cunt, we're talking about "tokens" which are sold by the dude who made them to a small group of people who then go on to publicly promote them.

Link is so fucking top heavy it's insane. Even if it weren't blatantly a security it would be completely shameful that 95% of the tokens are held in 5% of wallets. That's a bad enough sign completely on its own, it indicates developer greed and poor adoption. To throw on top that Sergey has every reason to pump the price, and that he is the only one that can give these tokens away, means now on top of being a greedy cunt, he's a greedy cunt who is marketing unregistered securities.

Do you think they registered their company in the Caymans just because? Do you think the constant thread spam on here about this has-been pile of dog shit is just because people LOVE it so much, despite holders getting absolutely JUSTed harder than just about any other crypto asset?

People who hold link are either whales who bought it years ago or late adopters who got completely shit on but think low IQ "breadcrumb" threads are sagely wisdom from the Gods...both are retarded.

>> No.51485515

coppers

>> No.51485591

>>51485443
>That is literally the definition in the 1933 act you fucking retard
"Investment contract" is how the Howey test refers to securities.

>we're talking about "tokens" which are sold by the dude who made them to a small group of people who then go on to publicly promote them.
If you shilling someone else's [item] meant that item became a security, you could turn literally anything in the world into a security.

There's a reason the SEC literally only ever slapped projects for being securities when the people behind the project themselves literally told people "we will make value go up".
Without a literal statement like that, it's literally impossible to prove intent.

>> No.51485639

>>51483736
Esl

>> No.51485646

>>51485639
copper

>> No.51485730
File: 500 KB, 1106x830, AA4266A3-007B-46EA-8EC6-67B53865598E.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51485730

>>51485418
This. Add to the list Fantom and you’ll start to see the Chainlink holders really are low IQ and talk a big game but are in fact stupid. It’s been 5 YEARS! For a 30x just admit you were wrong and you got conned. The sooner you admit this the sooner you can start to heal from it.

>> No.51485787

>>51485730
I don't get why you all need those arcane TA analyses. It's simpler. The coin is a centralized scam owned and controlled by 1 single company owned itself by 1 single person so it's inherently centralized and a scam to call it decentralized and not even crypto at all.

>> No.51486063
File: 162 KB, 819x1024, 1621279572924.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51486063

>>51483658
>copper
they're not even sending their best esl's
also, you're gonna want to kill yourself when you realize who actually owns that 60% (hint: its not CL)

>> No.51487035

>>51484510
>>51484587
>>51484642
>>51484695
>>51484721
>>51484747
>>51485443
Can you explain to an engineer kraut what the issue is with crypto being a security?
Why would nobody want to touch it, as it being dogshit?

I mean, even if they declare it as a security and as a investment in a company, they surely can revert that later, when staking is going to help the network to scale, so it'll rather be a technical enhancement, instead of a security. Which sure can take a while. Or will it be a precedent, which will never be reverted?
But they have to shut down crypto for a longer period of time in some kind of fuckery, that aligns with the world chaos, that we're heading towards to

>> No.51488667
File: 29 KB, 795x206, THEABSOLUTESTATEOFFUDDERS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51488667

>>51483584
>>51483658
>>51483736
>>51484056
>>51484070
>>51484080
>>51484091
>>51484104
>>51484118
>>51484133
>>51485515
>>51485646
>>51485787
wow what a fucking BASED retarded whitepaper avoider who spends 3 hours (in this thread so far) trying to fud link
all fields, looking forward to seeing 12 more of these threads today