why is Chainlink still above $1?

[Anonymous No.51464081]

are the the twitter marines and glowniggers shilling that hard on other platforms? where are they getting these new bagholders from?

[Anonymous No.51464469]

I require an explanation.

[Anonymous No.51464504]

>>51464081
Link is outside of the top 20 despite being a top crypto in terms of adoption and use.

So your question is downright bizarre.

[Anonymous No.51464528]

>>51464504
QNT is arguably much more successful and adopted yet it sits outside the top 50
your premise is downright moronic

[Anonymous No.51464569]

>>51464528
That changes nothing about what I said, you moron.

Also, literally nobody uses QNT for anything.

[Anonymous No.51464720]

>>51464569
nobody uses Chainlink or smartcontracts for anything meaningful as well, it's all restricted into the closed blockchain ecosystem, and the entire focus has shifted into making the various centralized l1 to communicate with each other, instead of actually making smart contracts with useful application in the real world
it seems that you have drank the kool-aid the shills keep offering you
ngmi

[Anonymous No.51464749]

>>51464081
token needed

[Anonymous No.51464783]

>>51464720
>nobody uses Chainlink or smartcontracts for anything meaningful
>it's all restricted into the closed blockchain ecosystem
This is exactly why the question in OP is so bizarre.
Chainlink is one of the absolute top cryptos in terms of use and adoption within crypto, but is extremely low in rank.
So OP is essentially saying ALL of crypto is overpriced; but then he singles out a crypto that is objectively undervalued compared to the rest of crypto.

Also, adding "meaningful" is a strawman, I never said that.

[Anonymous No.51464793]

>>51464783
qnt is even more adopted than link by your own exact definition
it is also much more accomplished than link and much more successful, integrations keep on happening, ties to Bank of England etc
no matter which angle you choose, you're absolutely coping, just admit that your shitcoin has failed

[Anonymous No.51464798]

>>51464528
>>51464720
>>51464793
shhhh it's okay

[Anonymous No.51464810]

>>51464793
Ties to the bank of england you say. Wow anon, that's massive. I wish LINK had any ties, connections and collaborations with tradfy.

[Anonymous No.51464820]

>>51464810
my point is that if these are the standards to measure "adoption" and "success", qnt has them in spades
but as usual, you keep holding LINK into an entirely different standard, refusing to accept it's just another shitcoin

[Anonymous No.51464860]

>>51464793
Anyone who buys stuff like QNT under the impression it can somehow compete against the absolute titan, Chainlink, has done no research and will only have himself to blame when he is shown to be wrong. Of course the guy shilling QNT likely knows this and that is why he is in this thread at all, in order to fud Link.

[Anonymous No.51464875]

>>51464860
anon, look at the chart, qnt has consistently outperformed LINK for almost 4 years>>51464528 and it still is in a much lower mc than LINK
it has already won

[Anonymous No.51464881]

>>51464860
>the absolute titan, Chainlink,
famous last words
remember Netscape? neither do I

[Anonymous No.51464988]

>>51464793
>qnt is even more adopted than link by your own exact definition
1) that has literally nothing to do with my point.
That only means that if OP had made this thread about Quant, his question would also be bizarre.

2) no it isn't, nobody uses Quant for anything.

[Anonymous No.51465089]

>>51464820
> my point is that if these are the standards to measure "adoption" and "success", qnt has them in spades
Even if that were true, this thread isn’t about quant so what are you even doing.

[Anonymous No.51465105]

>>51464783
>ALL of crypto is overpriced
duh

[Anonymous No.51465109]

>>51465105
So why single out one of the most objectively undervalued cryptos lol.

[Anonymous No.51465114]

>>51464875
>won
pajeet spotted

[Anonymous No.51465122]

>>51464988
LINK doesn't do anything either, so your question is truly bizarre, I'd say top 30 in capitalization out of 20,000 is pretty good for a vaporware
>>51465089
providing an answer to this question>>51464504
what are you doing here?
>>51465109
I'm not singling out link, you constantly do, it's nothing special and the chart is a testament to that
>>51465114
it's called past simple you illiterate troll

[Anonymous No.51465317]

>>51465122
>LINK doesn't do anything either
Nearly all of Defi runs on Link.

>I'm not singling out link, you constantly do
Look at the OP, retard.

[Anonymous No.51465386]

>>51465317
defi is useless
OP is under the premise LINK is a shitcoin
you seem to hold LINK to a different standard for no reason
cope and seethe

[Anonymous No.51465389]

>>51465122
> providing an answer to this question>>51464504
That’s a direct response to the op who brought up Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.51465408]

>>51465386
>OP is under the premise LINK is a shitcoin
No, OP is under the premise that all of crypto is useless.
Chainlink is one of the most adopted and used projects within crypto; PLUS Chainlink enjoys some of the absolute highest exposure outside of crypto.
So any negative remarks you make about Chainlink are therefore made against crypto as a whole.

[Anonymous No.51465423]

>>51465389
and my post is a direct response to his post
are you genuinely stupid?
>>51465408
no, OP never once stated such a premise, this is simply you moving the goalposts
keep coping though

[Anonymous No.51465436]

>>51465423
> and my post is a direct response to his post
See >>51465089

[Anonymous No.51465449]

>>51465436
see>>51465423

[Anonymous No.51465460]

>>51465423
>no, OP never once stated such a premise
It's an objectively verifiable fact that Chainlink is one of the most adopted and used projects within crypto, and that Chainlink has some of the highest exposure among legacy finance.

If you think these two usecases for crypto are meaningless, then what other usecases are there that would make crypto as a whole not shit?

[Anonymous No.51465480]

>>51465449
You’re asking why that poster holds Link to a double standard, but he’s only talking about Link because op was.

[Anonymous No.51465494]

>>51465460
scalable blockchains, smart contracts that are utilized in the real world, international transfer of wealth with minimal fees etc
neither of these are facilitated by Chainlink
>inb4 le future usecase
so a fantasy
>>51465480
I responded to a post I deemed wrong, I don't understand why you keep obsessing over my "motives"

[Anonymous No.51465515]

>>51465494
> I responded to a post I deemed wrong
No, you completely agreed with his premise that good projects exist that are undervalued compared to the rest of crypto.

[Anonymous No.51465547]

>>51465494
>scalable blockchains
Scalability isn't a usecase for crypto.

>smart contracts that are utilized in the real world, international transfer of wealth with minimal fees
You mean like legacy finance, where Chainlink has some of the highest exposure of all of crypto.

>inb4 le future usecase
Literally no cryptos are actually used in the real world right now.

[Anonymous No.51465578]

>>51465515
>agreed with the premise
sure, but link is simply not one of them
>>51465547
>Literally no cryptos are actually used
thanks for conceding, there goes your "usecases" argument
objectively speaking and using the exact same standards, QNT is as much accomplished as LINK

[Anonymous No.51465598]

>>51465578
>thanks for conceding, there goes your "usecases" argument
So your premise is that all of crypto is useless, since none of them are used in the real world.

>but link is simply not one of them
lmao but Quant is?
Quant has a tiny fraction of Chainlink's exposure to legacy finance, and isn't used within crypto at all.
By these two metrics, Chainlink is infinitely more important than Quant.

[Anonymous No.51465620]

>>51465598
no, my premise is that LINK in particular is an overhyped shitcoin, marketed exclusively to retarded frogs through a complex astroturfing campaign, designed to make you all lose your money
>lmao but Quant is?
yes
>Quant has a tiny fraction of Chainlink's exposure
blah blah blah, what's your source for this rampant speculation, dare I say, your anus?
charts don't lie anon, the best performer in the entire market for 5 years
cope harder pls

[Anonymous No.51465637]

plus nobody talks about it, if you ask me, there is the actual "hiding strategy"
Quant keeps getting bigger and bigger while it flies completely out of the radar of investors or /biz/ while all of you are preoccupied with LINK, XRP, ICP, GME etc
truly genius plan

[Anonymous No.51465642]

>>51465620
>no, my premise is that LINK in particular is an overhyped shitcoin
But anon, it's objectively one of the most adopted and used projects in all of crypto.

>blah blah blah, what's your source for this rampant speculation, dare I say, your anus?
Things like Swift, Citibank, Bank of America, Eric Schmidt, T-Systems, Associated Press, etc.

[Anonymous No.51465669]

>>51465637
Kek isn’t quanTard get btfo on CT by some link marines?

[Anonymous No.51465678]

>>51465642
it's not, you don't seem to understand the meaning of the word "objectively"
>Things like
for the nth time, Quant has all of these and even more
Bank of England, MIT, Crown Commercial Service’s G-Cloud 12, SIA, British Government ties, Oracle, AWS
why is teh based chainshit good but le scammy QNT bad?

[Anonymous No.51465716]

>>51465678
>it's not, you don't seem to understand the meaning of the word "objectively"
lmao, it's all out in the open. Chainlink partners and users are typically very open about their relationship with Chainlink.

>for the nth time, Quant has all of these and even more
Fuck no.

>Bank of England, MIT, Crown Commercial Service’s G-Cloud 12, SIA, British Government ties, Oracle, AWS
None of them are actually using Quant, they just mention it. Typically along with a bunch of other cryptos.
SIA never actually happened, and there hasn't even been a word about it since 2020.

>why is teh based chainshit good but le scammy QNT bad?
Even if QNT is everything you say it is, it changes NOTHING about my basic point here: >>51464504

[Anonymous No.51465754]

>>51465716
>le hiding strategy
>typical very open
>typically it dumps despite all of these grand entities utilizing it in a daily basis
typically, the deranged mind of the link shill contsantly contradicts itself with endless goalpost moving
truly a sight to behold
>Fuck no.
LMAO, nice argument
>none of them are actually using Quant, they just mention it
none of the entities you mentioned are using LINK either you giga brainlet, lmao, you already conceded to that here>>51465547
>Literally no cryptos are actually used in the real world right now.
it must be hell inside your brain
cope harder

[Anonymous No.51465765]

>>51465754
>>le hiding strategy
>>typical very open
Chainlink famously tweets about pretty much all partnerships and integrations.
I also never said anything about any hiding strategy.

>none of the entities you mentioned are using LINK either
lmao, T-systems, Associated Press, ... are actively using Chainlink right now.

[Anonymous No.51465904]

>>51465765
and nothing has come out of it
>never said anything about any hiding strategy.
sorry, it's a common talking point of link shills, I assumed you agreed
>are actively using Chainlink right now
they're not, stop contradicting yourself>>51465547

[Anonymous No.51465917]

>>51465904
>and nothing has come out of it
What?

>they're not, stop contradicting yourself>>51465547
Google it.

[Anonymous No.51465932]

>>51465917
source???

!!!

[Anonymous No.51465959]

>17pbtid over 3 hours
>claims to hate link
>does this multiple times a week
Absolutely deranged

[Anonymous No.51465971]

>>51465917
see>>51464528
>Google it.
just did, it says that nobody is actually using crypto for real life utilities
it also says that as of today, it remains a pipedream
I just found out that scams typically pay "high profile" individuals to associate with and promote their scam, it's the oldest trick in the book to add some legitimacy
as long as chainshit's usecases remain in the enclosed, self perpetuating crypto ecosystem, it's all a giant ruse and nothing differentiates link from qnt
cope
seethe
& dial8

[Anonymous No.51465978]

>>51465971
translation: "I googled it and now I'm butthurt"

[Anonymous No.51466038]

>>51465978
>you: unsourced claim
>me: source???

!!!

[Anonymous No.51466044]

>>51465978
please, demonstrate to me how exactly is chainlink being used by t-systems or AP
hard mode: no chainshit blogposts from 2 years ago

[Anonymous No.51466059]

>>51466044
>please, demonstrate to me how exactly is chainlink being used by t-systems
They both run nodes.

>no chainshit blogposts
lol don't worry, this was communicated by T-Systems, AP, ... themselves.

[Anonymous No.51466075]

>>51466059
source???

!!!

[Anonymous No.51466129]

So the jannies delete most link threads but leave this garbage tier thread of brainless squabbling up?

[Anonymous No.51466138]

>>51466129
source???

!!!

[Anonymous No.51466151]

>>51466059
it didn't, why do you resort to blatant lies that can be debunked in 2 minutes? these entities simply reposted what CL did
literal bullshit
>>51466129
there are like 15 link threads in the catalogue as we speak, touch grass

[Anonymous No.51466152]

>>51466129
Makes no sense. It's like three retards squabbling amongst each other.

[Anonymous No.51466183]

>>51464469
Anon, the jig is up. We all switched to overhyping SmartCon to demoralize the stinkmarines when its a nothingburger. Read the Discord.

[Anonymous No.51466196]

>>51466151
And not a single QNT thread. Why is that?

[Anonymous No.51466248]

>>51466196
because all of you are either shills, bots, or straight up retarded
do you think it makes sense that nobody is ever talking about the best performer in the market, even if it is a scam?? DOGE was going nowhere, we still got threads for it, same for SHIB, and countless other scams
it simply DOESN'T MAKE SENSE
only think that makes sense is that somebody is purposefully trying to hide it, and shills shift the focus to dead shitcoins that never pump and are there to trap bagholders

[Anonymous No.51466259]

>>51466129
i can repost
>File:Kyzikos - 430-410 BC - elektron stater - two eagles on the omphalos - quadratum incusum - Berlin MK BM
Kyzikos
>After the departure of the Argonauts in Lemnos, they landed in the island of the Doliones[5] of whom Cyzicus was the king. He welcomed the Argonauts on their journey to Colchis and received them with generous hospitality. But after their departure, a storm drove them back to the Cyzicene coast at night. With neither the Argonauts nor King Cyzicus recognizing one another, each mistook the other as an enemy and battle ensued. The Doliones thought they were Pelasgian army who constantly harassed them.

>The enemy have seized the harbour, our hold foes the Pelasgians have returned!” Men’s rest was broken; the god Pan had driven the doubting city distraught, Pan fulfilling the cruel commands of the Mygdonian Mother [i.e. Cybele], Pan lord of the woodlands and of war, whom from the daylight hours caverns shelter; about midnight in lonely places are seen that hairy flank and the soughing leafage on his fierce brow.
>The Argonauts slew many of the Dolionians, among the rest was King Cyzicus who was himself killed either by Jason or Heracles. The incident had been arranged by the gods Cybele, Pan and Bellona because Cybele wanted revenge against the king for killing one of her lions.[6] Valerius Flaccus recounts this account in the following passage:

[Anonymous No.51466272]

>>51466152
>As Cyzicus upon his swift horse shook Dindymus where votaries revel with bloodstained arms, and wearied the woods, he was betrayed by his too great love of the chase; for with his javelin he slew a lion that was wont to bear its mistress [i.e. Cybele] through the cities of Phrygia and was now returning to the bridle. And now (Madman!) hath he hung from his doorposts the mane and the head of his victim, a spoil to bring sorrow to himself and shame upon the goddess. But she, nursing her great rage, beholds from the cymbal-clashing mountain the ship with its border of kingly shields, and devises against the hero deaths and horrors unheard of: how in the night to set allied hands at strife in unnatural war, how to enmesh the city in cruel error.
When day broke, the Argonauts realized their tragic mistake, and granted Cyzicus an elaborate burial.[7][8][9]

>They [i.e. Argonauts] lamented for three days and tore out their hair; they raised a mound over the grave, marched round it thrice in armour, performed funeral rites, and celebrated games in honour of the dead man. The mound was to be seen down to later days, and the people of Cyzicus continued to pour libations at it every year.
After the burial, the Argonauts handed over the kingdom to Cyzicus's sons,[2] then sailed away and touched at Mysia. King Cyzicus left behind his young bride Cleite, who hung herself after her husband's tragic death.

[Anonymous No.51466292]

>>51466248
>21 screeching posts in an unrelated thread
Not a shill, sure

[Anonymous No.51466293]

>File:Kyzikos - 430-410 BC - elektron stater - two eagles on the omphalos - quadratum incusum - Berlin MK BM
omphalos (navel)
>the centre or hub of something.
>(in ancient Greece) a conical stone (especially that at Delphi) representing the navel of the earth.
>Omphalos originated as an ancient Greek word meaning "navel" and is distantly related to two other words of the same meaning, Latin umbilicus and Old English "nafela." (The latter of these is the source of our word navel.) The ancient Greeks also used "omphalos" to refer to a sacred, rounded stone in the Temple of Apollo at Delphi that was supposed to mark the center of the earth. In the 19th century, English speakers borrowed "omphalos" for this sense and its more general "center of activity" sense, as well as to refer to raised ornamentation on a shield or in the base of a cup or dish. In the 1920s, "omphalos" made another contribution to English via the word omphaloskepsis, which means "contemplation of one's navel."

[Anonymous No.51466327]

[Anonymous No.51466340]

After this post things go schizo

[Anonymous No.51466404]

>>51466292
it's very much related, you don't get to choose what is related and what not you imbecile
nobody can attack my arguments so you all resort to gibberish
fuck off

[Anonymous No.51466477]

>>51466248
Lmao. Just make a QNT thread anon. If it gets engagement, your theory might be true. If it dies with sub 20 posts then maybe just nobody cares about your shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.51466489]

>>51464860
fuck off sperg

[Anonymous No.51466775]

>>51466477
they die without a single post you retard, I've been here for 5 years

[Anonymous No.51467003]

>>51466775
>>51466404
>>51466248
>>51466151
>>51466044
>>51465971
>>51465904
>>51465754
>>51465678
>>51465637
>>51465620
>>51465578
>>51465494
>>51465449
>>51465423
>>51465386
>>51465122
>>51465089
>>51464881
>>51464875
>>51464820
>>51464793
>>51464720
>>51464528

[Anonymous No.51467317]

We ought to short Chainlink and destroy the Great Reset before it's too late. Maybe we need a twitter FUD battalion to counter their well funded shill campaigns.

But yeah it's almost $8 now, an -8x to $1 is feasible in the current environment imo, just needs more FUD

[Anonymous No.51467350]

>>51467317
>Just gotta try harder
Or guess what you can kill yourself it's free and guaranteed to work.

[Anonymous No.51467741]

>>51467350
Stare into my eyes and hear my words linkie

Let's get one thing straight. You WILL short those link bags. You WILL be happy with a 10% dump. That much I can tell you. A guard will come by your pod three times a day to administer the mood detection test. Should it read "insufficiently bearful," there will be an appropriate response. So, let me say it real clear. You're going to live with the dumps. You're going to keep all your profits. Yes, it will mostly dump, and you're going to love it.

[Anonymous No.51467766]

>>51466151
> these entities simply reposted what CL did
Lmao THEY are the ones running Chainlink nodes. They say so themselves.

You’re in a completely different dimension of stupid.

[Anonymous No.51467770]

>>51467741
I didn't read a word you posted faggot but I suspect you're one of the cancerous motherfuckers who constantly post negative shit here, I have a cheap and easy suggestion, go break into multiple peoples houses till you either find their gun and shoot yourself or the owners take matters into their own hands.
Enjoy!

[Anonymous No.51467937]

>65% of ETH production controlled by exchanges
>buy LINK
>2023 comes
>now 95% of ETH production is controlled by two addresses owned by the WEF
>LINK do a 50x
>try to sell
>discover the WEF increased the gas fee to 49x of what LINK did
>end up with the same amount of money as before

>b-b-but is chain agnostic!

[Anonymous No.51467971]

>>51467766
lmao, CHAINLINK paid them to run the nodes, which btw don't do ANYTHING
what kind of cope is this

[Anonymous No.51468008]

Even XRP is more trustworthy than LINK.
I never saw anyone complaining about gas fees in XRP.

[Anonymous No.51468039]

>>51467937
>What are Exchanges for $100 Bob!

[Anonymous No.51468290]

>>51467770
>negative shit
Thank you for your positive sentiment. I can already feel your positivity reaching me this very moment. I will change my ways and embrace the positive side from now. We all make mistakes linkie.

[Anonymous No.51469143]

>>51465386
You should diversify your investments rather than putting all your eggs in one basket because of this. Invest in alts with working products like COTI, XPRESS, EBOX, and CATE as you try to diversify your portfolio kek.

[Anonymous No.51469229]

>>51466151
>it didn't
>these entities simply reposted what CL did
You done lost your marbles.

>>51467971
>CHAINLINK paid them to run the nodes
holy cope

[Anonymous No.51469287]

>Nobody talking about this

[Anonymous No.51469303]

>>51469287
Fucking trash site

[Anonymous No.51469630]

>>51464528
QNT also has notably better partners like ALBT. And they've been around since 2018

[Anonymous No.51469636]

>>51469303
>alpha
carrot dangling

[Anonymous No.51469677]

>>51469636
>25ptid
How much are you getting paid per post? Because there’s no way you’re doing this for free… right?

[Anonymous No.51469706]

>>51469677
my bags are vastly outperforming yours as we speak
how does this make you feel?

[Anonymous No.51469760]

only a 7x from here and its back at ATH. omg I am SO EXCITED for you guys.

[Anonymous No.51469792]

>>51469229
Lmao you really didn’t argue with that shitposter did you, and even go search out a fucking tsystems paper with proof of usage?

[Anonymous No.51469921]

>>51469706
Kek

[Anonymous No.51469940]

>>51469792
Even the very slight possibility that this tard is actually legit nad only now just finding out about this excites me.

[Anonymous No.51469945]

>>51469630
They're partnered with LINK too, retard. Not just QNT

[Anonymous No.51469955]

>>51469706
And yet here are.

[Anonymous No.51469980]

>>51469940
bro, I already told you, try to prove the tangible usecases that T-systems enjoys thanks to their link node without resorting to a blogpost from 2 years ago
the only thing t-systems is benefiting from is getting free link from the subsidies to dump them on the open market
lmao
>>51469955
here are what?

[Anonymous No.51470233]

>>51469980
>T-Systems etc. are NOT running nodes!
>I mean they're PAID to run those nodes!!
>I mean you have to prove that running those nodes provides """tangible usecases"""!!!

Goalposts launched into orbit.

[Anonymous No.51470248]

>>51469980
Exactly. Link stealing money from retail to bribe a few “big names” to run a node makes us money how exactly???

[Anonymous No.51470262]

>>51470233
>>51465547
>cognitive dissonance: the post
>moving the goalposts
>>51466044

[Anonymous No.51470300]

>>51470262
I replied to that post saying they run Chainlink nodes, and you then called me a liar.

[Anonymous No.51470345]

>>51470300
no I said that these entities simply reposted the chainlink announcements, they are running nodes, but like you said yourself, are totally worthless
you can masturbate to these "enterprise nodes" all you want, reality is they don't mean anything
then you proceded to

[Anonymous No.51470346]

>>51470262
This wouldn’t even win a medal in the /biz/ shit flinging olympics. I’m gonna assume you didn’t get the memo regarding our posting points.

[Anonymous No.51470412]

>>51470345
>no
Literally yes. >>51466151
>why do you resort to blatant lies that can be debunked in 2 minutes?

[Anonymous No.51470444]

eth dumping is very bullish for link sirs and the 10 threads on here from the team urging you to buy immediately (also conveniently just before an event) can be nothing but sound financial advices sirs.

[Anonymous No.51470531]

>>51470444
checked and rekted

[Anonymous No.51470534]

>>51470444
By far the greatest urging itt is coming from the fudders, as fucking always.

[Anonymous No.51470593]

>>51464504
No one talks about that shitty LINK except retards 4chaners... ALBT got more and better utility than it

[Anonymous No.51471698]

>>51470534
extremely based posts anon.

[Anonymous No.51471919]

>>51471698
Based, who still gaf about LINK, get a life anon
>>51470248
Demn.
>>51469630
Oh yeah.. QNT been banging and making sense alots indeed, that's what Alliance block partnerships brings

[Anonymous No.51474518]

>>51469143
The best way to avoid getting rekt is to diversify, and xpress is a low cap to add before the start of the token burn. While it's on sale, it seems like a decent deal.

[Anonymous No.51475691]

>>51468008
There are better chains that have the ability to introduce a sound methodology that raises the caliber of work, such as Geeq, which makes it possible for the data management system to be more secure and adaptable to our demands. Don't need to stuck up kek.

[Anonymous No.51476283]

>>51471919
Link? Kek

[Anonymous No.51476299]

>>51471698
Huh?

[Anonymous No.51476309]

>>51470531
Hahaha

[Anonymous No.51476893]

>>51475691
The company's relationship with them will be strengthened as a result. Once their product is published, using it is quite convenient imo.

[Anonymous No.51476909]

>>51476283
chainlink

[Anonymous No.51477009]

>>51476909
That's scam

[Anonymous No.51479129]

>>51464081
>>51464081
$12.65!!!
WTFWT MARINES?!?!! GTF IN HERE!!

[Anonymous No.51479445]

>>51464528
chainlink is inarguably the single most succesful and adopted crypto project in existence, by and extreme margin. it sitting outside the top 1 does not make any logical sense

[Anonymous No.51479618]

>>51464881
It had the best logo. Whoosh