/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.51459131]

>Brainlet here
How can Chainlink secure anything if a centralized group ends up with control over 51% of Eths stake? Cryptographic guarantees are compromised if it rests upon a centralized L1 that can attacked. The worst case scenario will become reality given enough time. How do I cope

[Anonymous No.51459143]

>>51459131
>How do I cope
By killing yourself

[Anonymous No.51459171]

>>51459131
LINK can provide an oracle service to keep the ethereum chain decentralized. trust.

[Anonymous No.51459203]

>>51459131
>>51459143
>>51459171
chainlink is literally stamped on to the new financial system by the new mint chainlanklabs schizos please take your meds

[Anonymous No.51459229]

>>51459171
What

Is crypto truly dead with this majority of stakers being 1-2 entities debacle?

[Anonymous No.51459360]

>>51459131
what part of chain agnostic do you not comprehend?

[Anonymous No.51459760]

>>51459360
Chainlink services are chain agnostic but the token isn't. If eth is compromised then Chainlink services are too (powered by an ERC token). What am I not comprehending

[Anonymous No.51459771]

>>51459760
the token can be easily bridged to other Networks.

[Anonymous No.51460003]

>>51459760
It isn't chain agnositc if it depends on ETH being up, that isn't how any of this works. The entire point is there is no exposure to any given chain failing.

[Anonymous No.51460024]

>>51460003
Jesus christ are you really that retarded?

[Anonymous No.51460028]

>>51460003
In theory, lets say ETH fails, what happens to our linkies?

[Anonymous No.51460044]

>>51460024
Uupsie, wrong post.

This guy:
>>51459760
this guy is the real pajeet.

[Anonymous No.51460525]

>>51460028
>>51460003
>>51459760
I have been asking this for while now
my link needs eth to move
if eth stopped working, how can i bridge it to another chain?