Chainlink staking

[Anonymous No.51375351]

Chainlink staking

[sage No.51375368]

No

[Anonymous No.51375381]

>>51375351
I want to put my link inside

[Anonymous No.51375415]

when

[Anonymous No.51375419]

>>51375415
2 more weeks

[Anonymous No.51375422]

>>51375351
and we all know it's coming soon, too
you can tell by how desperate the fud spammers are

[Anonymous No.51375438]

>>51375351
I think Chainlink stakes!

[Anonymous No.51375482]

live feed from link HQ

JUST

[Anonymous No.51375498]

>>51375422
Don't get your hopes up, it's not worth the mental anguish

[Anonymous No.51375620]

CCIP soon bros

[Anonymous No.51375634]

>>51375620
Link to tweet?

[Anonymous No.51375656]

>>51375415
Kek perfect encapsulated feeling there anon

[Anonymous No.51376335]

>>51375351
Okay, so basically LINK tokens have value because you will soon be able to stake them to earn more LINK tokens which are valuable because you can stake them to earn more LINK tokens which you can use to stake more LINK tokens. That is why the LINK token is valuable.

[Anonymous No.51376400]

>>51375482
absolute unit

[Anonymous No.51376672]

>>51376335
They secure the network. The network captures value from the data it processes. When a person stakes Link he is using them to secure the network thus earning him a portion of the revenue from the data which passes through the node he has staked in.
Data is valuable.
I know you don't have schools in Bulgaria but you should try and educate yourself.

[Anonymous No.51376901]

>>51375381
Do it

[Anonymous No.51377032]

>>51375351
scam scam scam

[Anonymous No.51377157]

>>51375351
The Top 3 Possible Chainlink-Staking Outcomes:

1.
>staking finally arrives
>unstaking requires Level 70 VAXXPASS™

2.
>mandatory staking
>lock-in period: 3 years
>may never unstake

3.
>no staking ever comes
>the Great Reset is dead on arrival and Chainlink goes to zero

[Anonymous No.51377204]

>>51375351
this didn't happen 2 years ago? where are we?

[Anonymous No.51378106]

>>51375422
>soon

He doesnt know

[Anonymous No.51378111]

>>51375620
Duuuuuuude sick bredkrumbzzzzz!!!

[Anonymous No.51378118]

>>51375620
isnt that the faggot that said ccip will be ready 2021 EOY?

[Anonymous No.51378123]

>>51376672
But why does anyone care about securing a network for a bunch of tech buzzwords?

[Anonymous No.51378144]

>>51378123
You stick out like a sore thumb in every thread. Keep posting though, the seething is hilarious

[Anonymous No.51378394]

>>51378144
Are you the guy who keeps downvoting me? Reporting you to sec for shilling an unregistered security. Also youre soliciting donations for a nonqualified charity (chainlink labs), so Ill report to IRS as well. Hope you have a good lawyer

[Anonymous No.51378531]

>>51378118
Yep and he removed that tweet

[Anonymous No.51378559]

>>51375415
after le merge

[Anonymous No.51378590]

>>51378559
why after the merge? this is a project run by the wef, which is of course luciferian. even though link staking has been ready for some time now, eth staking must come before link staking - as above, so below.

[Anonymous No.51378595]

>>51376335
They’re locked collateral against smart contracts with varying expiry / finite supply. It’s not fucking rocket science anon

[Anonymous No.51379213]

>>51375620
WELCOME TO THE CRUMB ZONE

ONLY CRUMB INSIDE ANIME GIRLS

[Anonymous No.51380418]

>>51376672
>secure the network
it's just people throwing money onto the biggest pile because they want a cut of the profits. this is not securing anything, no review is done, it's a fantasy to keep the system limping along so the devs can continue to dump tokens. the profits will be spent on frivolous garbage like a HR department or tech conventions that nobody wants to visit

[Anonymous No.51380468]

>>51380418
retard confirmed

[Anonymous No.51381151]

>>51380418
top tier fud.

just market sold.

[Anonymous No.51381213]

>>51375351
Not needed.

[Anonymous No.51382404]

>>51375351
Chainlink staking is a ponzi scheme, no different than LUNC staking or staking bitcoin on CB or Bancor.

>b-b-but muh implicit staking

Implicit staking is simply a marketing gimmick. The ETH Dao haxor had implicit stake to not take advantage of the faulty contract. Bitcoin miners have implicit stake to recycle more plastic bottles so that the government will lay off trying to ban POW. Dogecoin baggies have implicit stake to tell all their friends to buy Dogecoin. Its all bullshit. The only thing implied is that the chainlink stakers will lose all their money.

>okay fine but what about explicit staking? Its different bro trust me.

No. Simply NO. It just DOES NOT WORK. Do yourself a favor and look up top Chainlink wallets. Notice how this small handful of wallets is increasing their market share, while linklets are selling. It is in fact these big wallets who will decide what is truthful data and what is not. They are explicitly incentivised to collaborate with eachother to fudge the data.

[Anonymous No.51382568]

>>51382404
I trust Sergey, Eric, Ari, Ben and the other big brains at chainlink. I think you're a sad dweeb who sits around in his underpants eating shit food and has little social contact. I'm not saying this to be mean or anything. I just truly believe it, and so I'll stay with the geniuses if that's okay.

[Anonymous No.51382608]

>>51375351

[Anonymous No.51382702]

>>51382568
>I can't refute anything, instead I'll appeal to authority and project my sad existence onto others as an insult
sometimes businesses overpromise and underdeliver, it's a common occurrence

[Anonymous No.51382745]

>>51382568
Good luck with that. I hear SirGay has an totally legitimate piece of paper saying that he has a degree in psychology. That should keep the ponzi going long enough for me to cash out.

[Anonymous No.51382753]

>>51382702
>I devote a lot of my free time trying to dissuade people from buying Link tokens
You're one real piece of shit who would sooner see bankers hold Link than your fellow citizens. You're rotten inside, and I truly hope you receive the misery you deserve in life. I think you will.

[Anonymous No.51384258]

>>51382404
>>51382745
>literally writing walls of text begging people to sell
i love how you retards never seem to understand that your begging gets less effective the more you do it
the volume of the garbage that you "people" produce is one of the reasons that i still buy link every single week, and newfags start to get curious about it
sloppy, sloppy job simeon

[Anonymous No.51384307]

>>51382404
>No. Simply NO. It just DOES NOT WORK.
Thank you for your analysis. Bought 100 more.

[Anonymous No.51384405]

>>51384258
I never said you should sell. Chainlink cryptocoin may be a scam, yes indeed. But you can still make money off of this dumpster fire.

My advice? Sell on the deadcat bounce to $200 and DO NOT BUY BACK IN. It will be headed towards 80 cents after that. Maybe 94 cents if there is any bullish news coming out

[Anonymous No.51384443]

>>51384405
>deadcat bounce to $200

[Anonymous No.51386666]

I feel suicidal. I could have made it if I sold last year, but I didn't. And now I think about killing myself every single day. I hate Sergey and Chainlink so fucking much. My whole life consumed for 5 years and it's ruined now.

[Anonymous No.51386697]

>>51375351
Not needed.

[Anonymous No.51386706]

>>51375368
Yes.

[Anonymous No.51387349]

>>51386666
quads of six I am reading the exact opposite of your post

[Anonymous No.51389394]

>>51375415
When the weather cools

[Anonymous No.51390210]

didn't they confirm its Q3? So it needs to release same day as smartcon.

[Anonymous No.51392181]

>>51390210
They said that the ongoing token release was due to some 'big initiative' in Q3, people speculated it was staking

[Anonymous No.51392233]

>>51392181
>'big initiative'
I don't remember that. Is that fake and gay? Sounds rather fake and gay. Maybe it's gay and fake. Is it gay and fake?

[Anonymous No.51394327]

>>51386666
holy checked

[Anonymous No.51394341]

>>51389394
They're trying to force gods hand again.

[Anonymous No.51396812]

>>51375482
I think at this rate his blood pressure will hit 1k before link does.

[Anonymous No.51398566]

soon bros

[Anonymous No.51399133]

>>51398566
I have a gut feeling I’m gonna meet Sergey and Ari one day