[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 215 KB, 1080x1056, Screenshot_20220831-120953.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51190616 No.51190616 [Reply] [Original]

Another L for Chainlink

>> No.51190625

It’s over

>> No.51190655

>>51190616
>inb4 this is Compound's fault non Chainlink's
>inb4 this is bullish
>inb4 muh fudders are desperate

>> No.51190679

stacking is bullish as fuck

>> No.51190710
File: 53 KB, 589x299, GODMAN.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51190710

>compound fucked up

why would you use uniswap TWAP to circuit break chainlink price feeds

>> No.51190724

>>51190710
like clockwork>>51190655

>> No.51190795

>>51190616
So Chainllink

>> No.51190934

>>51190710
lmao why didnt chainlink audit uniswap oracles and compound?

another classic case of chainlink not pulling their weight.

more to the point why didnt CLG catch this critical logic error if he is as logical as he claims

>> No.51191332

many such L's

>> No.51191795

>>51190710
Cope

>> No.51192515

Nothing but Ls with this piece of shit.
Fuck LINK

>> No.51192540

>>51190616
>Compound fucks up
>HAHAHAHA TAKE THAT CHAINLINK

>> No.51192562

>>51190616
tells you all you need to know about bullshit 'auditing' of code

>> No.51192573

>>51190934
Why is this chainlinks job? They’ve pulled their weight and created easy to use price feeds for anyone and seem to be the only people that care about frontier level research and development in a world of copypaste scams, and countless rebranded L1s.

>> No.51192577

>>51190710
It was always a retarded idea and seemed to be based more on faith in uniswap's authority rather than on sound design principles.

>> No.51192582

>>51192573
I think he was being sarcastic

>> No.51192603

>>51190616
>>51190710
Code quality in crypto is a joke.
Auditors are a meme, few developers have the necessary experience to realize truly comprehensive audits. And they all work on making things. These auditors are barely beyond junior tier.

>> No.51192626

>>51192582
Maybe he should’ve green texted. Everyday something gets exploited and Chainlink doesn’t seems to cement the stranglehold they have on crypto. I’d guess we’re about 2-3 moves away from checkmate.

>> No.51192663

I don't understand anything but I still FUD Chainlink

>> No.51192667
File: 126 KB, 841x500, 1648297123067.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51192667

No half measures.

>> No.51192758

>>51192603
This is why no real company/bank participates in this circus

>> No.51192776

>>51192626
2-3 more weeks

>> No.51192788

>>51192758
umm anon, real companies/banks have constant exploits and failures despite audits too.
In fact, one of the main reasons why they're looking into smart contracts is BECAUSE their dinosaur backends are so prone to failures.

>> No.51192799

>>51192776
>something something validators.
Yeah 2-3 weeks seems appropriate

>> No.51192838
File: 303 KB, 278x538, mfw.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51192838

>>51190934
>Mfw there are people who actually think like this
Some people just can't fathom that Chainlink providing docs, tutorials, guidance, even audits is a show of good faith and proof that they want to be a robust as possible industry standard. It's not a requirement. Many companies have little to no aftercare once you use or implement their shit.

Last time Chainlink "fucked up" there were anons actually trying to blame Chainlink for not auditing every shitty little adaptor made by 2 interns for a low volume shitcoin project lmfao

>> No.51192882

>>51192573
>>51192626
>maybe he should’ve greentexted
HEY SÖY BOY I AM BEEING SARCASTIC NOW

>> No.51192900

>>51192788
I'm talking about Goldman Sachs buying a bunch of ETH and placing it on COMP for cETH, and then getting rug pulled

>> No.51192930

>>51192900
You were talking about how no real company/bank participates in crypto.

>> No.51192960

>>51192930
Yep, and I'm right. Name the real companies, not memes like Microstrategy or Tesla. Real companies

>> No.51192971

>>51192960
see >>51192788

>> No.51193525

>>51190616
> Look good to you Amar?
> Looks good to me, what about you Rajneesh
> Checks out here, any thoughts Kabir
> Nope, we are good. Ill move the audit to complete on trello

>> No.51193613

>>51190724
lmfao
same vibes as "wow it's not chainlink's fault we hardcoded the luna price"
stinkies want to argue their centralized solution will eat the world AND want you to design around the dozens of pitfalls of their proprietary harebrained design

>> No.51193810
File: 32 KB, 600x655, c2d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51193810

>>51193613
>Heh, Chainlink fucked up because one of our devs hardcoded AG instead of AU into the contract
>Heh, Chainlink fucked up because we hardcoded the LUNA price in our design despite best practices outlined by Chainlink
>Heh, Chainlink fucked up because we used Uniswap TWAPs as a failsafe which blew up in our faces
>Heh, Chainlink fucked up because ETH shit the bed and it cost them millions in gas to keep reporting the right prices (which they did)
>Heh Chainlink fucked up because...
The list goes on and on. Calling out "inb4 it's not Chainlink's fault" is literally meaningless if it is proven time and time again to not be Chainlink's fault.

>> No.51193829

>>51193810
except that Chainlink did fuckup in each and every one of these occasions
blatantly lying about it with a straight face won't change a thing

>> No.51193870

>>51193829
>If I gaslight random anons on 4chan this will contribute to my goals in life
Some of you niggers are so fucking weird

>> No.51193880

>>51193870
the irony of this post is off the charts

>> No.51194238

>>51190724
>blatant lie
>"inb4 someone calls me out for "lying""
>get called out for lying
>"oh look someone called me out but I preempted it, I win!"

>> No.51194378

>>51194238
>n-no y-you
keep deflecting bitch boy

>> No.51194506

>>51194378
your prostate is due for a pounding

>> No.51194612

The token is needed, I need it

>> No.51194627
File: 823 KB, 2000x2000, 8970D437-EB3C-4F55-8D0B-CC836766D3F7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51194627

>>51190616
>hires HR roasties instead of engineers
>jason parser shits the bed
I would throw that fat fuck in a black hole but he'd swallow it, was a millionaire in 2021 now barely a hundredaire because of le hold

>> No.51194708
File: 534 KB, 434x526, 1649740480889.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51194708

>>51190934
>another classic case of chainlink not pulling their weight
AHAHHAAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHHAAH *breathe* AHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAH *gasp* HAHHAHAHAHAAAHHAHAAHaghaghaghahahahahahhjaAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH *struggling for breath* HAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHhahaahahhaahHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAHHHAahhahAHAHAHAHAHAHahAHahHAHHAHAHAHAHahahahAHAHahAHAHahahahahhaah*cough*HAAHHAHAAHahahhh*wheeze*AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>> No.51194779

nolinkers seething as usual

>> No.51194819

>>51190616
>Person purchased a completely functional knife
>Person stabbed himself with knife by accident

I mean, I guess it is user error, but after this happens a number of times, you really have to consider if you’re providing specific enough instructions to your retarded users

>> No.51194930

imagine believing that faulty code would ever make it past Sergey after seeing how he grilled that nerd on the twitter town hall thing

>> No.51195039

>>51190710
>Uniswap twaps
anybody taking twaps from this bucket shop serious is not a serious company

>> No.51195064

it's another episode of "protocol has a problem, alludes to chainlink being responsible, turns out that chainlink wasn't the problem". someone should make a compilation of these.

>> No.51195129

>>51193810
>oh fuck, my bags got btfo again
>i know! i'll reply to the post pointing out the inanity of expecting people to build their own stuff around proprietary harebrained design filled with engineering pitfalls by telling him he should have built his own stuff around proprietary harebraine ddesigned filled with engineering pitfalls
worst part is you probably don't even realise what you're saying. you're just too low iq for abstraction so to you "best practices outlined by chainlink" is a positive argument rather than a catastrophe in waiting

>o-one day sirgay will make me part of the 3-of-21 multisig

>> No.51195172

>>51195129
stop fudding man, this is "the future of decentralized finance" right there

>> No.51195183

>>51192577

This.
>we want to use LINK Feeds because they are best
>but politics means we gotta give uniswap some way to feel important

>> No.51195212

>>51195129
>>51195172
less talky more cummy

>> No.51196750

>>51195129
>tfw some non comp sci "hare brained" retard tries to lecture me on something I literally do for a living
Good luck with your abstractions. Users will always be retards and the software provider can't hold hands through the entire process. At some point the dev implementing said software has to take responsibility. Chainlink is providing a framework and a service, not a toddler daycare.

>> No.51196961

>>51193870
>gaslit
this is the new tranny meme. this guy is obviously a bulgarian tranny from discord unironically>>51193870

>> No.51197003

>>51196961
Link fuddies started saying it in LINK threads a few weeks ago, I thought it would be funny to flip the script. I mean, everyone can look up the post mortems of those "LINK failures" and see that each and every time the devs admit it wasn't Chainlink that failed. To claim otherwise is a prime example of gaslighting.

>> No.51197069
File: 63 KB, 765x618, blizz venus.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51197069

>>51197003
>everyone can look up the post mortems of those "LINK failures" and see that each and every time the devs admit it wasn't Chainlink that failed
Some of these are legit hilarious

>> No.51197119

How many more examples do you cultists need to understand LINK is garbage? Every minute of everyday LINK fails, another L indeed on the ever growing pile

>> No.51197136

>>51197119
>How many more examples do you cultists need
Let's start with one lol

>> No.51197165
File: 84 KB, 960x960, michaeln.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51197165

>>51195129
kek

>> No.51197186

>>51195129
>3-of-21 multisig
Man, remember when braindead fudders tried to make this a thing?

>> No.51197210

>>51197003
You are a LINK fuddie and you are gaslighting me right now

>> No.51197243

>>51197210
Are you the "Are you fudding LINK right now?" anon?
LINK threads really attract a lot of mentally ill people and I'm pretty sure you are one of them.

>> No.51197277

>>51197243
Stop the FUD right now this is a serious Chainlink thread

>> No.51197345

>>51197277
>I got BTFO so now I will post nonsense to provoke and ramble for 60+ pbtid to derail the thread
This is my last reply, good riddance.

>> No.51197367

WHY THE FUCK IS /BIZ 24 HOURS BEHIND SCHEDULE ON THE NEWS. THIS SHIT WAS TOP OF THE HOUR FUCKING YESTERDAY ON TWATTER. DID YOU KNOW THAT DC AG IS GOING AFTER MICHAEL SAYLOR & MICRO STRATEGY FOR TAX FRAUD/EVASION? NO!! YOU DON'T BECAUSE IT'S NOT ON THE FRONT FUCKING PAGE! FUCKING THIS BOARD IS GOING TO MISS THE TOP ON THE NEXT BY A GOOD 24/48 HOURS. GET YOUR FUCKING SHIT TOGETHER FAGGOTS.

>> No.51197380

>>51197345
All I ask is you take this thread seriously

>> No.51197853

>>51197345
top kek the link fudder had to abandon the thread

>> No.51198254

>>51190616
This piece of shit is going to wreck the whole crypto market.

>> No.51198352

I barely know shit about crypto but reading these arguments is always the same. The fudders always seem like little retards.

>> No.51198457

I’m actually at the point where I’d be happier if chainlink failed than made me rich.

>> No.51198476

>>51198352
Smart contracts are a meme and will never be used in business. People who talk about them all starry-eyed are completely naive about the world of finance and business. That's why Chainlink won't succeed outside of a possible pump orchestrated by whales. But by looking at its chart, that's looking increasingly unlikely.

>> No.51198585

>>51198476
I don’t even know what that means but I know that when I see people arguing about chainlink it always seems like the fudders are being stupid and the chainlink people are just tired of them

>> No.51198636

>>51190616
This has become one of those projects you just set it and forget it. Come back later and hope for the best. Hopefully your bags aren't too heavy.

>> No.51198720

>>51198585
Do you think that niggers and Jews are bad news? If so, chainlink's for you!

>> No.51198786

>>51198585
They're both dumb, the real answer is that blockchain will never see enterprise use, which is what linkers count on to "make it". I've also noticed that link holders like >>51198720 tend to be racist nonces typical to this website.

>> No.51198961

>>51198786
>I've also noticed that link holders like >>51198720 tend to be racist nonces typical to this website.
He is a Chainlink fudder that has this theory about all Linkers still left on the board being /pol/ chuds that can't let go of their bags which they bought at $50. The post you quoted is his quirky way of fudding Chainlink. Also, you have to go back.

>> No.51199063 [DELETED] 

Syscon relies on the most widely trusted and thoroughly tested security model in the industry Bitcoin's Proof of Work through a process called merge mining.

>> No.51199078

>>51198786
>blockchain will never see enterprise use

Don't conclude. Perhaps we are still early, and there are many like Geeq working to see this through. Well, let's see what the future of blockchain will be.

>> No.51199110

>>51199063
>merge mining
What do you mean by this?

>> No.51199145

>>51199063
Go drown in the Ganges, currynigger