"WTF!! WHY IS IT STILL DUMPING?? WASN'T 30K/20K LE BOTTOM?? I'M CONFOOOSED"

[Anonymous No.51126671]

REMEMBER TO ZOOOOOOOOOOM OUT
AND CHECK THE MONTHLY STOCH RSI!

[Anonymous No.51126688]

>>51126671

you seem really invested in getting people to sell, huh. Wonder what your motivation could be…

[Anonymous No.51126708]

>>51126688
Or he's just trolling knowing full well a ton of longs are about to get liq'd

[Anonymous No.51126711]

>>51126671

also your faggot chart starts in June, we hit bottom

[Anonymous No.51126761]

>>51126671
The bottom will be in late September/early October.

[Anonymous No.51126808]

>>51126671
Absolutely based. Almost 3 months later and that chart is still as important and as relevant as it was then: >>/biz/?task=search2&ghost=yes&search_text=&search_subject=CONFOOOSED&search_username=&search_tripcode=&search_email=&search_filename=&search_datefrom=&search_dateto=&search_op=all&search_del=dontcare&search_int=dontcare&search_ord=new&search_capcode=all&search_res=post

>>51126711
Welcome to /biz/, newfag.

[Anonymous No.51126824]

>>51126688
OP sold at $ 60k and wants to buy at $ 6k. That's how you create generational wealth.

[Anonymous No.51126843]

>>51126808

been here since march 2017 faggot

[Anonymous No.51126855]

>>51126711
>plebbitspacing
>>51126843
>plebbitspacing

[Anonymous No.51126858]

>>51126671
notice how this faggot didn't align this properly
He didn't align it well for the first and third to spin a retarded narrative.

/thread

[Anonymous No.51126934]

>>51126855
>Guyzzz he hit the RETURN key LOL LOLOLOL
>He is LE PLEBBLITOR LMAO XDXDXD

you can use one or two spaces in text for readability, newfag

This is reddit spacing.

Do you see it faggot? How I'm using it as a niggerlover reddit dweller?

THIS is reddit spacing. Now you can go back to le epic trolling in an anonymous anime themed image board

[Anonymous No.51126976]

>>51126688
i wonder if hell succeed at getting the shutin failures here to dump their combined $22k worth of bitcoin?

[Anonymous No.51127003]

>>51126976

countless groups shill on /biz because it effects market sentiment, they’re not stupid and doing it for free

[Anonymous No.51127101]

>>51126934
You are SO used to doing the redditor's hit-space-before-posting-writing that you instinctively do it here as well without even thinking about it. You didn't realize you were doing it now until you got called out for it. Return.

[Anonymous No.51127103]

>>51127003
lol he thinks this childrens cartoon forum affects anything. what a retarded loser

[Anonymous No.51127143]

>>51126711
>>51126858
The OP chart is aligned to the Stoch RSI point level. The blue area starts and ends where it should. You got zero clue what you're looking at. Clueless brainlets. Every time. Check the replies to posts like yours in the previous threads to educate yourselves:

> In chronological order, archived.moe:
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/49516729/
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/49528965/
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/49529059/
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/49533246/
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/49543399/
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/49590459/
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/49610911/
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/49663882/
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/49727128/
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/49769945/
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/49792036/
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/49794283/
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/50064894/
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/50064938/
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/50078239/
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/50310335/
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/51126671/

> In chronological order, warosu:
>>/biz/thread/S49516729
>>/biz/thread/S49528965
>>/biz/thread/S49529059
>>/biz/thread/S49533246
>>/biz/thread/S49543399
>>/biz/thread/S49590459
>>/biz/thread/S49610911
>>/biz/thread/S49663882
>>/biz/thread/S49727128
>>/biz/thread/S49769945
>>/biz/thread/S49792036
>>/biz/thread/S49794283
>>/biz/thread/S50064894
>>/biz/thread/S50064938
>>/biz/thread/S50078239
>>/biz/thread/S50310335
>>/biz/thread/S51126671

If you paid any attention in previous threads then you'd already know the chart is properly made.
But of course, it might just be that you're so new that today is the very first time you're seeing the OP chart, hence your confusion over June.

[Anonymous No.51127167]

>>51127103

it literally does stop gaslighting, faggot

[Anonymous No.51127185]

>>51126671
>OP posts a 4 month old chart to make it look like we have further down to go
nice jew tricks OP

[Anonymous No.51127218]

>>51127143
>The OP chart is aligned to the Stoch RSI point level.
What in the mother fucking god damn hell is a "point level"? You're supposed to look at crosses, you dumb nigger.

[Anonymous No.51127293]

>>51127143
You're referring to the y axis. That is equally inconsistent. In the last one for instance they started it at 0, but they didn't for the rest. For instance in the first one they ignored the first touch at 0. The second one actually crossed bullish at the moment the zero was hit making your argument even more horseshit

[Anonymous No.51127495]

>>51127218
>You're supposed to look at crosses
You're one of the brainlets this based high-IQ anon talked about: >>51113535
Quote from that post in that thread:
>Brainlets however, when they look at a Stoch RSI chart like the OP one, they only see "two lines", think nothing at all about the market or about the market situation, and think what they're seeing means that "two lines will cross, and this crossing - that graphical happening on the chart itself - that will cause people to sell!". It's totally idiotic to look at it that way and extremely simple-minded. It's no wonder that they (coupled with, and compounded by, turning themselves into bagholders through not taking profits when they should and not selling before crashes etc due to their general brainletyness) get upset and angry at Stoch RSI charts, when they're looking at them in that idiotically simplistic way and fail to grasp that what they're seeing is a visual representation of the market's movement and its sentiment and that the Stoch RSI isn't something that causes the market to do anything or which the market reacts to.

That's you.

And in stark contrast to you, a brainlet:
>When smart anons look at a Stoch RSI chart they know what they're looking at is the will of the market. They know when it nears the top it will inevitably always go down - the Stoch RSI itself, that is. And, hence, the price is about to go down (compared to what the price was when the Stoch RSI was high or topped). Always. And not /because/ the Stoch RSI got high. No, they don't think the Stoch RSI is something that's "doing" anything or "causing" anything to happen. Rather, again, they know it's just one of the many ways of visually illustrating the market, the will of the market; what the market is doing and what it wants. And they know sometimes the Stoch RSI won't reach 100 points (or 0) due to the market situation and the zoom level - in this case a bear market and zoomed out (as opposed to a 1h chart).

[Anonymous No.51127509]

>>51126671
10k is bottom, maybe even 5k if Mt gox dumps

[Anonymous No.51127538]

>>51127495
Nigger, I'm mot reading all of that. You can easily make it a sentence long, but you like to talk a lot of retarded shit to try to add legitimacy to your garbage. Fact is:
1. It's not based off of crosses
2. The y axis it's based off of is inconsistent as shit

[Anonymous No.51127570]

>>51127538
>conceding his retardation and doubling down on it, confirming for everyone he's one of the brainlets >>51110165 talked about

[Anonymous No.51127582]

>>51127570
Lmao saying "you're a retard!" isn't an argument. My 2 points still stand. TA isn't complicated. You just don't know how to use it. Keep shit posting frogs though. I'm sure that's adding to your weak ass argument somehow.

[Anonymous No.51127587]

>>51127538
>conceding his retardation and doubling down on it, confirming for everyone he's one of the brainlets >>51113535 talked about

[Anonymous No.51127595]

>>51127587
>>51127582

[Anonymous No.51127697]

>>51127167
> le gaslighting le shills le stay poor le faggot
what a loser

[Anonymous No.51128039]

>>51127538
He's 100% correct. You're not supposed to look at crosses. If someone is looking at Stoch RSI the way you're doing, and he thinks the indicator means the market is going to react to the "cross" and thus "the cross" will "cause" a dump to occur, then that anon is very new to this.

You look at the point level. The point number. That's what's important. What's important is whether the Stoch RSI is high or not, in conjuction with the market situation. You're babby to charting who discovered Stoch RSI very recently.

[Anonymous No.51128126]

>>51128039
>He's 100% correct. You're not supposed to look at crosses.
Nigger. I 100% made 2 points. Whether you look at crosses or the y axis, it's is inconsistent either way.
Illiterate fucks, LOL

Tell me, bitch. What specific "point level" did they use :)? You can't answer that, can you? LOOOOL.
If you look at the horizontal lines for instance, you can clearly see they randomly and stupidly started to mark the beginning and ends to all point to spin the "~273 days" narrative.
Check mate, retard

[Anonymous No.51128223]

>>51128126
Wow it sure is hard to see the Stoch RSI points.
Hint: near 100 is high, near 0 is low.
The bottom area of the Stoch RSI in the OP chart, in all three blue areas, is between 0.8 to 6.2, in other words very low. The left dashes begin when it entered that low range (the range between 0.8 to 6.2).

Even with this spoonfed help, this is all probably way too difficult for your brain to process though.

[Anonymous No.51128255]

>>51128223
>Hint: near 100 is high, near 0 is low.
Ya no shit, dumb retarded idiot. My point is where they STARTED and ENDED the 273 day count was 100% random whether you look at crosses OR the percentages in the y axis.
Learn to fucking read, midwit.

[Anonymous No.51129806]

>>51126671
>>51126808
>>51127143
Low-IQers will still be seething at this chart into 2023.

[Anonymous No.51129823]

Based STOCHRSIanon.

>tfw have 400k liquid just waiting to buy

Waiting until March at the earliest

[Anonymous No.51130228]

>>51128255
Total opposite of random. Seems you're not getting what you're looking at, at all. The chart takes the Stoch RSI point level and the first green monthly candle into account -- that's what the blue boxes and dashed lines are about, clearly. It's what the chart is about. The blue boxes begin and stop with the Stoch RSI at a very similar point level, below 6 -- where the Stoch RSI reaches down that low, there you got the left dashed line, and where the Stoch RSI begins going up away from that point level in conjunction with the first bullish candle (end of bear market), there you got the right dashed line.

In other words the chart is revealing the bear market will be end just before March 2023. It's extremely easy to understand. However, if you bought at 69k and have been hoddeling since, then I guess that could make it very difficult to process the visual information in an honest-to-yourself manner due to the heavy cognitive dissonance you're experiencing and the extreme bias clouding your head.

[Anonymous No.51130299]

>>51130228
>The chart takes the Stoch RSI point level and the first green monthly candle into account
>first green monthly candle into account
Clearly they don't do that and even if they did, that would be random as SHIT LOL
>that's what the blue boxes and dashed lines are about, clearly.
You said they base it off a green monthly candle when clearly that is not how they do it. They are literally being random as to when they decide to start and end the measurement. You're such an imbecile that has never traded in their whole life, huh? RSI is not about looking at price either, dipshit. It's exclusively about looking for crosses and oversold/overbought territories.

Jesus christ.

[Anonymous No.51130325]

>>51130299
>Jesus christ.
seething baggie mutt detected

[Anonymous No.51130342]

I see the SRSI threads every once in a while, it's always the same picture. And I have no idea how to replicate it, it just doesn't look like that on a monthly chart. Guess I'm a moron?

[Anonymous No.51130346]

>>51130228
>The blue boxes begin and stop with the Stoch RSI at a very similar point level, below 6
>similar
>not exact
LMAO this is what I'm saying. That they are choosing arbitrary shit instead of having an actual method to begin the measurement.
They are randomly choosing when to begin based on a whim. They do NOT all start when the same condition is met. They have no fucking pattern to this. How the FUCK do you imbeciles not understand?

[Anonymous No.51130355]

>>51130325
Not an argument. You're a midwit

[Anonymous No.51130640]

>>51130346
It look like there still some space left to dump.

[Anonymous No.51130645]

>>51126671
It's going to be an entertaining ride and /biz/ will only get comfier the deeper we go.

[Anonymous No.51130840]

>>51130299
What the actual hell. I read through your stinking posts, holy shit you have to be trolling or you're actually mentally handicapped. There's not even any dashed line in your cropped pic. You posted that pic to show that "Look! There's no green candle above the dashed line!" as if the guy you responded to ever said there should be, or as if that's what's on the chart.

Do you have severe reading difficulties? And severe eye problems?

The RIGHT dashed lines are where the first green candle after the bear market appears: >>51126671

That line (the RIGHT-side dashed line) continues up into the candle. The cropped pic you posted is of a LEFT-side dashed line. Obviously there's neither a green candle nor a dashed line there.

If you truly can't understand the above and can't see it, then you're 100% confirmed mentally handicapped. You've repeatedly demonstrated your extreme confusion and lack of attention. On the other hand if you've been trolling the entire thread, then good job. But if you're not trolling; people like you are part of the reason why /biz/ will get comfier the deeper into the bear market we go, as your kind always end up leaving.

[Anonymous No.51130872]

>>51126671
monthly stochRSI is bottomed you fucking idiot. it can stay that way for months/years so I'm not saying that it's bullish but maybe you were looking for the phrase "weekly stochRSI"

[Anonymous No.51130893]

>>51130645
Looking forward to it. The tourists and redditors are finally going to disappear. Well most of them anyway.

[Anonymous No.51130921]

>>51126671
holy shit this bull run was pathetic

[Anonymous No.51130935]

>muh monthly stoch is bottomed
its not set in stone how long it must stay low. looking at 1.. 2.. and then expecting 3 is classic noob trap territory

growth will come from shorter time frames into longer ones, its up to you/the market to decide where the threshold is

[Anonymous No.51130964]

>>51126688
if anything this is a buy signal

[Anonymous No.51131039]

>>51130840
>There's not even any dashed line in your cropped pic. You posted that pic to show that "Look! There's no green candle above the dashed line!"
You FUCKING RETARD. That pic was in reference to the "green month" bullshit, you fucking low IQ imbecile. The OTHER pic after that post shows that there is no actual reasoning as to when they began to start counting the days.

God DAMN, you are a fucking moron.
>The RIGHT dashed lines are where the first green candle after the bear market appears
Pic related. You have down syndrome. Clearly there was green monthly candles even BEFORE then.

LOL

You're also missing the point, you STUPID fucking faggot. They started counting randomly. There is no common pattern between the 3 brackets. The retard is just spinning the narrative of "273 days!" out of pure randomness. How the fuck are you even capable of breathing? It's impressive. Actually mentally disabled, holy fucking shit. I hate retards.

[Anonymous No.51131109]

>>51130840
Also LOOOL
>first green candle after the bear market appears
You fucking god damn idiot. It's BEEN a 10 month bear marker and months 4, 5, and 9 were green. Your reasoning is absolute HORSESHIT. FUCK! We need IQ tests per IP address to filter you morons out for good.

[Anonymous No.51131141]

>>51130342
I believe the anon in question uses the weekly chart, not the monthly.

[Anonymous No.51131152]

[Anonymous No.51131173]

>>51131152

[Anonymous No.51131211]

>>51131039 >>51131109
Ends, not appears, obviously. And you know it.

Let me post it again with the typo corrected. Now there's absolutely no way out for you:

>>51130299
What the actual hell. I read through your stinking posts, holy shit you have to be trolling or you're actually mentally handicapped. There's not even any dashed line in your cropped pic. You posted that pic to show that "Look! There's no green candle above the dashed line!" as if the guy you responded to ever said there should be, or as if that's what's on the chart.

Do you have severe reading difficulties? And severe eye problems?

The RIGHT dashed lines are where the first green candle after the bear market ends: >>51126671

That line (the RIGHT-side dashed line) continues up into the candle. The cropped pic you posted is of a LEFT-side dashed line. Obviously there's neither a green candle nor a dashed line there.

If you truly can't understand the above and can't see it, then you're 100% confirmed mentally handicapped. You've repeatedly demonstrated your extreme confusion and lack of attention. On the other hand if you've been trolling the entire thread, then good job. But if you're not trolling; people like you are part of the reason why /biz/ will get comfier the deeper into the bear market we go, as your kind always end up leaving.

[Anonymous No.51131255]

>>51131211
Dumbass. There is no pattern as to when they began the 273 day count. It's that simple. Guessing up the fucking ass. That's not TA.

[Anonymous No.51131268]

>>51131255
It begins just where he pointed out, after it entered the below 6 area.

[Anonymous No.51131280]

Stochastic RSI threads always cause maximum butthurt and max cope from liq'd bulls and idiots alike. Glorious to witness.

[Anonymous No.51131297]

>>51131280
this
RSI is a meme and running stoch over it doesn't make it any better

MACD / ma cross is better in every way

[Anonymous No.51131298]

>>51131268
You illiterate god damn retard. Pic related. They IGNORED the first touch at fucking 0 but then started it at near 0 with the second touch. LOL

You know why? Because if they had started it from the first one, it would show their 273 day crap would be wrong. You are fudging shit to fit your narrative.

[Anonymous No.51131559]

>>51126671
One is not like the others.

[Anonymous No.51133105]

>>51131298
>They IGNORED the first touch at fucking 0 but then started it at near 0

See: >>51127495

Quote from >>51113535 who accurately described brainlets like you and predicted your behavior and brainletty posts in this thread.

>When smart anons look at a Stoch RSI chart they know what they're looking at is the will of the market. They know when it nears the top it will inevitably always go down - the Stoch RSI itself, that is. And, hence, the price is about to go down (compared to what the price was when the Stoch RSI was high or topped). Always. And not /because/ the Stoch RSI got high. No, they don't think the Stoch RSI is something that's "doing" anything or "causing" anything to happen. Rather, again, they know it's just one of the many ways of visually illustrating the market, the will of the market; what the market is doing and what it wants. And they know sometimes the Stoch RSI won't reach 100 points (or 0) due to the market situation and the zoom level - in this case a bear market and zoomed out (as opposed to a 1h chart).
>And they know sometimes the Stoch RSI won't reach 100 points (or 0)
>And they know sometimes the Stoch RSI won't reach 100 points (or 0)
>And they know sometimes the Stoch RSI won't reach 100 points (or 0)

Your posts get more cringe every time.