SmartCon 2022 Agenda released

[Anonymous No.51116339]

Probably nothing burgers and we are all retarded, but here you go:

- Fireside chat with Eric Schmidt and Sergey
- Talk with SWFT and DTCC

[Anonymous No.51116395]

>>51116339
https://smartcon.chain.link/agenda

[Anonymous No.51116399]

>>51116339
So it is a nothingburger lol

[Anonymous No.51116403]

that happened last year aswell
seethe and dilate baggies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uxF4Q6_glY
token not needed

[Anonymous No.51116456]

>>51116339
Nice.

[Anonymous No.51116589]

We had Smartcon 0 in 2020 and Smartcon 1 last year. Why are't we calling this year Smartcon 2? This is causing me a great deal of stress and playing havoc with my OCD. Consistency must be key or we are surely all doomed.

[Anonymous No.51116992]

>>51116399
>Charles Hoskinson not on the agenda
Yeah nothingburger for sure. Not watching

[Anonymous No.51116993]

This is huge

[Anonymous No.51117089]

>The SWIFT and DTCC guys just giving a generic talk about the industry that they're only doing because they were paid to show up
Nothingburger

[Anonymous No.51117102]

>>51117089
This

[Anonymous No.51117163]

>>51116403
they should just roll out a TV and replay the video tape. what a fucking let down.

[Anonymous No.51117169]

>>51117089
>>51117102

[Anonymous No.51117198]

>>51116403
>make the lie big and keep repeating it

[Anonymous No.51117204]

it literally cant br a nothingburger because staking is supposed to be Q3 and smartcon is the last day of Q3. How can it be anything but rolling out staking and possibly CCIP you goofs?

[Anonymous No.51117243]

“Chainlink Product Keynote” with the CPO, head of dev relations, Lemonade and CF Benchmarks.
Cf benchmarks are on some institutional shit, and Lemonade are a non profit working on climate stuff (African farmer insurance etc).
Where does this slot in? My initial reaction is it could be enterprise front end related.

[Anonymous No.51117246]

>>51117204
There’s an article about it preceded by smartcon you retard

[Anonymous No.51117294]

>>51117246
article about staking? Where?

[Anonymous No.51117309]

>Delivering Web3 Software by Ben Chan of Chainlink Labs
>Delivering Web3 Software
based boy wonder is gonna send it

[Anonymous No.51117316]

Ari’s talk is called “FSS in action” sounds like we’ll get a live demo

[Anonymous No.51117384]

The CF benchmarks guy is giving a talk on creating a Bitcoin interest rate benchmark, first off is kind. Benchmarks look like the foundation for institutional adoption, to me.
Honestly wasn’t that interested in SmartCon until seeing all these, but this is exciting.

[Anonymous No.51117416]

>>51117384
>>51117316
Too bad no one’s fucking going lmao

[Anonymous No.51117432]

>Cathay Financial Holdings' Current Development in Blockchain and Cross-Chain Technologies
this would be interesting to hear where they are at and how they are progressing and sorts of problems they are overcoming but it will probably be vague institutional babble about things happen slowly and the future is right around the corner

[Anonymous No.51117449]

>>51116339
Exciting times ahead for sure. The end of this year is going to be kind to us gentlemen. Its been an honor

[Anonymous No.51117459]

>>51117294
Idk look it up

[Anonymous No.51117510]

Dahlia is talking about DECO with some guy working on burrara.xyz which seems like some super secret vc shit with no public facing info. SNX guy is talking about CCIP.
This is stacked. Worst part is that only some of the talks are getting posted online, there’s soo much here I would like to watch.

[Anonymous No.51117575]

>>51117449
nothing ever happens

[Anonymous No.51117585]

From the burrata description, no surprise he’s presenting about DECO

[Anonymous No.51117593]

>>51117575
Until it does

[Anonymous No.51117605]

Proof of Reserves live demo confirmed

[Anonymous No.51117615]

makerdao and compound attending kek this is great

[Anonymous No.51117828]

>>51116339
Am I taking crazy pills or is not a single Nigger speaking? Not even a token Nigger, the most exotic panelist and presenter is a rice Nigger.
What a racist an non inclusive faggot convention

[Anonymous No.51117882]

>>51117089
This. Fireside chat will be a nothing burger too. Why am I attending this shit

[Anonymous No.51117974]

>>51117828
based and white pilled

[Anonymous No.51117998]

>>51117882
>there are people that actually paid $1.5k for a smartcon ticket
Lmao

[Anonymous No.51118028]

>>51117828
too bee quiet honest with chu nigger there are probably more jews attending than any other ethnic minority. and slavs are not white and neither are jews so it is a diverse and multi racial crowd

[Anonymous No.51118036]

Also why do you retards still think “staking” is going to be a game changer? This is fucking poor excuse of a beta testing version of staking.

Nothing will ever happen. Actually we will most likely dump lmao

[Anonymous No.51118037]

>>51117998
and then they were refunded the difference and spent in getting high on blow and ramming hookers raw whats the big fucking deal bitch?

[Anonymous No.51118051]

>>51118037
Yeah cause no one’s fucking going you dipshit

[Anonymous No.51118055]

>>51118036
nothing ever happens this is true and /biz/ sentiment is bearish as fuck secretly i am also bearish I want you to know this is financial advice :^)

[Anonymous No.51118075]

>>51118051
plenty are going. its the blockchain event of the year. you think people are seriously considering going to whatever con in san fran or wherever else? no fucking way dude smartcon is the place to be

[Anonymous No.51118192]

>>51117828
ETHsign speaker, nice try

[Anonymous No.51118214]

>>51118075
Everyone will go to corda con you faggot

[Anonymous No.51118239]

>hmm don’t have much on today, I guess I’ll just 68pbtid derail some chainlink threads yeah that’ll pass the time

[Anonymous No.51118268]

>>51116339
If Schmidt is only doing a fireside chat that is unironically hugely bearish

[Anonymous No.51118282]

>>51118268
Did you expect a keynote? He’s not building anything.

[Anonymous No.51118295]

>>51118214
even the people living in London are desperate to leave London example Jonny and come to Smartcon

[Anonymous No.51118296]

>>51118268
He’s just an advisor wtf did you think he was gonna do? Advisors don’t do shit

[Anonymous No.51118304]

>>51117089
I am fucking sick of "the future of industry x" talks. It's the same shit for years now where some guy whose office is the basement of a regional office is paid to make the company look forward looking by talking about technology the company itself has no involvement in. It's not just a blockchain phenomenon either. I'm in medicine as work and conferences are full of the exact same shit.

[Anonymous No.51118356]

>>51118296
I know but if he was advising in any substantial sense he would at least be able to give a solo talk about the product. Fireside chats are always content free blither where one person leads and the other just says "yes that is exciting". It's honestly the first thing that suggests Schmidt is literally paid just to have him nominally as an advisor.

[Anonymous No.51118375]

>>51118282
He's a big name so I hoped he would be given his own slot to talk about the market, specifically chainlink, maybe give some info about what he's done. Don't pretend we didn't all look forward to it thinking he had a speech.

[Anonymous No.51118393]

>>51117449
At this point I'm almost certain we're going to end this year under $20.

[Anonymous No.51118395]

>>51118356
I'm sure a Top 100 richest billionaire cares about whatever pocket change million or two Chainlink can pay him lol

Think deeply, Schmidt doesn't associate himself with any other blockchain/crypto project but Chainlink

[Anonymous No.51118415]

>>51118375
why would you want the give the mic to a boomer for a long period of time? you know hes just gonna ramble about the good old days at google

[Anonymous No.51118417]

>>51117243
> the institutions were defi african farm insurance

[Anonymous No.51118445]

>>51118415
I'll take that over Sergey demonstrating waking sleep apnoea as he talks about what an oracle is.

>>51118395
Chainlink can pay a lot more than a million or two, that said you also don't get to be a billionaire without having an endless pursuit of money. Otherwise you'd retire at $5mil.

[Anonymous No.51118452]

>>51118375
>I hoped he would be given his own slot to talk about the market
Really? You expected Eric Schmidt to come and talk about the market? Fucking lmao

Schmidt is here because of the Truth Machine you dummy dum, he doesn't care one bit about any token, that's all kiddie shit compared to the Truth Machine. Do your research

[Anonymous No.51118463]

>>51118393
without a doubt

[Anonymous No.51118469]

>>51118452
By the market I meant the blockchain sphere. As market can be commonly understood to also refer to a general professional sector.

[Anonymous No.51118487]

>>51118445
but people still dont understand. after all these years of the same speech with the same slides. even the famous link shills on twitter call the internet for blockchain "boring". like enabling all these usecases and showing people how systems have been set up to rob them in the past is "boring" fucking swear you niggers huff the same fud too much and it confuses your shill angle

[Anonymous No.51118517]

>>51118487
You're a real fucking retard showing you haven't been paying attention. He hasn't delivered the "what is the oracle problem" speech in ages, it was just a joke expressing that his talks have been vapid and repetitive. Well done lmao.

[Anonymous No.51118532]

>>51118469
Of course he will, but mostly about cryptography/blockchain, not about ""the market""". The Truth > Trust part especially will probably be a big talking point between Sergey and Schmidt.

Schmidt already talked about Chainlink even before he officially became an advisor, so expect more of this type of stuff
https://mobile.twitter.com/kofinas/status/1460365062103781384

[Anonymous No.51118558]

>>51118517
>no u
no u nigger. kek you are one of those twitter niggers shilling chainlink as the boring stage of crypto arent you?
as if vitalik's yellow paper was sexier than "boring old chainlink" go fuck yourself kek

[Anonymous No.51118573]

>>51118532
You must be ESL to not understand the 'market' colloquially refers to an area of enterprise not necessarily the economics of it. But it's besides the point as we're agreed on wanting him to talk about that, but we were hoping for a dedicated talk.

[Anonymous No.51118575]

CF Benchmarks launching a BTC benchmark is the most bullish crumb from this whole thing. Look into what CF Benchmarks do.

[Anonymous No.51118738]

B-bros

[Anonymous No.51118910]

>>51118738
>lank muhreens finna identify themselves are sovereign citizens of the network state
the absolute state excuse me but I am bi-national
lmao imagine the mETH trannies and their dark anime avatars excuse me but I transnational

[Anonymous No.51119014]

>>51118738
shilling his new book

[Anonymous No.51119154]

>>51117089
I fucking told you guys (well there was one deluded faggot I was arguing with) that this was gonna happen and as usual I got called a Bulgarian fudder KEK. This is just getting so sad at this point, we are so fucked.

[Anonymous No.51119198]

>>51119154
Are you congratulating yourself on your prediction that hasn't even happened yet? Fuck you're a retard.

[Anonymous No.51119280]

I used to care I really did I watched every single Sergey talk or ari. Now I just don't care I want my money. I want my millions to spend frivolously on lambos and bullshit until I get bored and end myself. I don't care about the tech I don't care about making the world a better place. In fact I'd rather create a world of suffering because after seeing the response to covid everyone deserves it

[Anonymous No.51119306]

>>51119154
Personally I've lost so much money now that it's almost pointless to sell. Gonna hope for something.. anything good to come out of smartcon. Though I won't be surprised that all we get is another 50% drop.

[Anonymous No.51119305]

>>51119280
This

[Anonymous No.51119315]

>>51119280
You're the exact person they don't want to make it

[Anonymous No.51119331]

>>51116589
Cause Smartcon 2022 sounds cool while still having 2 at the end.

[Anonymous No.51119356]

>>51119331
>2+2+2=6
>Bricks shatten

[Anonymous No.51119358]

>>51118738
Bankless had a cool podcast interview with him. It was quite insightful.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEoxETtJ67Q

[Anonymous No.51119389]

>>51117089
This. The DTCC will show up to birthday parties for kids too if you just through a couple bucks their way

[Anonymous No.51119511]

>>51119389
bullish
party hat on dtcc guy

[Anonymous No.51119661]

>>51119306
Same boat. Probably gonna be the wrong move 6 months from now but I can’t sell at these pathetic prices. If you were to time travel back to 2018 /biz/ and tell them LINK will be $6.50 in August 2022 you would have been laughed out the room as a fudder.

[Anonymous No.51119720]

>>51116339
whats the name of DTCC's project that is goign to tokenize their underlying assets?

[Anonymous No.51119866]

>>51116339
Only newfags still hold this shit

[Anonymous No.51119870]

Why is some guy from Synthetix discussing the state of CCIP, and not someone from Chainlink Labs?

[Anonymous No.51119889]

>>51119870
Practical implementation and shilling their products using the tech

[Anonymous No.51119900]

>>51116339
I am seriously starting to lose it.
The disconnect between the price and the project is so great that it would surely make everyone think they must be insane to think it's so valuable.

Is BTC going to crash to 0 on the day of this event?
It keeps dumping every time Chainlink has something positive going on.
If they keep crashing it there won't be anything left to dump.

[Anonymous No.51119920]

>>51117882
You’re actually going? What the fuck, kek

[Anonymous No.51119927]

>>51118393
This would be the first year since ICO that we did not reach a new ATH. I've been thinking about this lately and am not quite sure what to think about it.

[Anonymous No.51119988]

>>51119661
Not if you would have also mentioned it hit $54 before that

[Anonymous No.51120008]

>>51119720
project ion but if you like patterns all the central bank experiments are all called project (((something))) same nomenclature = same organization pull strings and pushing buttons

[Anonymous No.51120011]

>>51116992
Charles is a walking embodiment of a nothing burger

[Anonymous No.51120016]

A lot of this stuff actually looks pretty good for Chainlink. The only disappointing thing is that I'm not sure if staking is even going to get mentioned here lmfao. Fuck Sergey for announcing it at the start of the year.
>>51119889
>Practical implementation
Looks like they've got some kind of functional prototype at least. Also, I just noticed that it's the CCIP GTM guy (Pieter Pauwels) that's also participating in that chat. It should be good then.

[Anonymous No.51120041]

>>51117204
In a recession
Stock market on verge of capitulation
You are retarded

[Anonymous No.51120064]

>>51118393
>>51119927
Did it really take you this long to find out Chainlink would be fighting a difficult battle to recover everything it lost?

It probably would have been better for most of us to sell at $20 2 year ago and never come back to cryptos.
We exchanged a quick pump for a slow grind.

The real question is will we be able to live from staking one day in the next 12-24 months?

>>51119870
I would prefer if they explained to me how it works and what its economic model is, but it would be too technical I suppose.
Getting examples of real world application is a second best option.

[Anonymous No.51120248]

>>51120041
money is being prepared in advance of chainlink releasing products and staking going live is a watershed moment. old tech stocks were culled and BTC is losing market dominance. ETH is dumping harder than LINK. And whatever distraction pump they try to push briefly above LINk's marketcap is failing to attract new interest (CRO, NEAR, ATOM previously UNI but UNI secured another billion from unknown sources to push it above the mid twenties rat race)

I think we are going to see some shit but nothing ever happens

[Anonymous No.51120274]

>>51117204
I don't remember. What did they say about Q3?
Do you have the article for this?
I am starting to think they may be more behind schedule as they previously thought.

I can only find the mention of a release in Q2 of 2022 here:
https://blog.chain.link/chainlink-staking-roadmap/

They had an article about future planning but can't find it.
IS it this?
https://blog.chain.link/sustainably-growing-chainlink/

>To create clarity for the Chainlink community, and as a critical part of Chainlink Economics 2.0, the Foundation expects that no more than 5% of total supply (50 million LINK tokens) will be moved into the circulating supply, over the next 9 months, through the first quarter of 2023. These releases to circulating supply will support the growth of the network, including the upcoming launch of staking later this year. It is expected that the upcoming launch of staking should have an indirect offsetting effect to these token releases, partly depending on whether the amount committed by stakers reaches the planned initial cap of 75 million tokens. The Foundation expects that these token releases into circulating supply will be small in the near term and will be focused on the already occurring oracle rewards, until additional deployments are required for additional key initiatives in the third quarter of 2022 and into the first quarter of 2023.

What does through the first quarter of 2023 and over the next 9 months mean?
Did they mean until the first quarter of 2023?
There is only one more month left for the additional key initiatives of this quarter.
I know it's because of the ETH merge adding risks, but in that case they are going to run a marathon if they plan on releasing new features before the SmartCon.
This also means the staking cap will be max 75 million tokens until Q1 2023.

What I don't know is what happens next.
From the token and staking perspective too. They don't plan on subsidizing staking forever after releasing it.

[Anonymous No.51120296]

>>51120248
Is it?
From the correlation and stock market comparison it seems institutions are the ones dumping BTC and ETH when the stock market dumps and cause the lack of pumps because they don't buy back.
They probably can't dump Chainlink as much because they don't own it.
It's sad that the institutions we were hoping would pump Chainlink are the worst case of weak hands who keep dumping ETH and BTC because of algo trading.

[Anonymous No.51120302]

>>51118295
Jonny must be vaxxed, then.
Ouch.

[Anonymous No.51120330]

there's a lot of highly bullish stuff in here, bridgetower will be talking about how it uses chainlink. I also find it interesting that there are a TON of speakers focused on zk rollups. I also don't see Reitwiessner's talk anywhere yet, plus Ed's talk is mysterious and undescribed... I think we will see more stuff added to this agenda over the month

[Anonymous No.51120403]

>>51120248
My personal hopium is that pre staking the ideal strategy to accumulate link is to suppress the price to accumulate as much as possible as well as demoralize holders and make them capitulate. this is because pre staking, the most effective way to accumulate the link token is by buying it on exchanges. but once staking is released, the most effective way to accumulate link will just be staking. and if they pump the usd price, that means they have to sell that much less of their link rewards to cover expenses and take profit, and are able to compound more link, while also pricing everyone else out now that they've accumulated their shares of the network.

[Anonymous No.51120476]

>>51120403
Too much hopium. Nothing is going to happen. It's going to keep going sideways and follow the market.

[Anonymous No.51120475]

>>51116589
make it more normie friendly
why did the first one start with a zero!!??

[Anonymous No.51120551]

>>51120302
I was checking out this and it seems you must be vaxed to go to the US?
This makes me worried about their ability to deliver on their very long term goals.

Did Jonny say something about his Node as a Service project?
They are focusing on their staking products now, but if we are to expect a growth explosion then their node renting service will be a sign of this happening.

[Anonymous No.51120557]

>>51120476
Maybe. Either way, I'm a very patient man, so ultimately it does not matter.

[Anonymous No.51120569]

by the way, go to schmidt futures website, click "our people" and tell me they aren't ai-generated

[Anonymous No.51120655]

>>51120569

[Anonymous No.51120797]

>>51119870
Moderator is literally their CCIP GTM Lead retard

[Anonymous No.51120887]

>>51116339
Is it true that smartcon will have shinja's devs as their secret panelists? All of the telegram, twitter and youtube clues are there. The deciphered code its all there, it even spells "GAMINGS" S like in shinja. Seems kinda confirmed to me

[Anonymous No.51120933]

I’ve been holding link since 2017 how are we only at $6.50.

What did I get wrong in my investment thesis

[Anonymous No.51120991]

>>51120933
Don't know anon. I really don't get it. To be honest I think the mistake was assuming that we were past the point of "retarded" shit in crypto. In 2017 I thought after the ICO scam phase we would transition to "real" projects being the ones to make it. It looked like Chainlink was validating that up until 2020, but since then the market has become even more retarded than 2017 where no one even pretends to hide that they're shilling scams. It was so in your face this time around with the animal coin bullshit, NFT bullshit and metaverse bullshit. There's more to it than just that but in hindsight I do see that as one of my mistakes.

[Anonymous No.51121046]

>>51120991
no the point of crypto is to encourage meme runs so vcs can get in early and others can profit from front running. retail are left holding the bag. there is no incentive to change that dynamic.

[Anonymous No.51121055]

Did not see this add earlier today.

[Anonymous No.51121067]

>>51120991
In 2020 I was contemplating of selling link to eth but didn’t because I figured eth was competing with other Layer 1 platform and link was market leader in the Oracle space. Which imho would be less risk. Boy was I wrong I could’ve made it

[Anonymous No.51121107]

>>51121055
Haha I can’t wait to make money and watch fudders seethe. Just ate a big mac in honor of Serg

[Anonymous No.51121150]

>>51121055
I'm guessing it's simply because it's an ad they're running on Google, not because of anything deeper like muh Google acquiring Chainlink shit.

[Anonymous No.51121163]

>>51121067
98% of 2017 ICOs are dead. Chainlink has the ex Google chairman, SWIFT and DTCC reps speaking at their conference.
It’s such a stupid pointless process to beat yourself up retrospectively when there was absolutely no way to know that Chainlink’s price would flounder this much. All you can do is invest in fundamentals and then wait for the market to acknowledge them.
It’s not your job to make a series of perfect decisions, in fact it’s a completely irrational seethe to hold on to. All you can do is develop a strong thesis and keep folding new information into it so you know you’re still on the right track. And every indication is that Chainlink of going to far surpass the expectations that we set for it in 2017. So you can hold and wait or you can hold and seethe or you can sell, and it blows me away how many people choose the seething route.
For every “I could have bought x at y date and I would have made it by now” there are 20 other ways you could have lost it all. Try thinking about them for a change and appreciate how lucky you are to be in the game at all.

[Anonymous No.51121169]

>>51121150
But whoever is doing this at Chainlink is obviously doing this on purpose because they know some of you retards are going to look way too deep into a discount code. MUH SEVEN SEVEN SEVEN BROOOOOOOOOS.

[Anonymous No.51121213]

>>51121163
I appreciate your point of view bro.

I’ve been running what if scenarios in my head everyday since this whole market taking a shit like an endless nightmare.

I thought Sergey’s infamous video of staking being released this year would mark a bottom for links price

[Anonymous No.51121265]

>>51121163
>how many people choose the seething route.
People aren't "choosing" to seethe, they're expressing their emotions and it's very obvious to see why many are disappointed to see where we're at right now. You can say it's stupid and stuff but in order for anyone to actually take your advice they need to process their negative emotions in one way or another. I think it's been really bad recently with the amount of anger and frustration we've seen because there's been a lot of build up over the last 12 months of people getting their hopes up and then being let down. I think collectively it's sinking in that we're still in for quite a long wait until things get better in terms of price. I've always said that I think Chainlink as a project will continue to do well, they've always prioritized security and correctness and that's served them well in building their reputation right now. However, you can't be naive enough to think that everyone here is going to be happy with that alone. People are here to make money at the end of the day, and absolutely no one would believe you in 2018 if you told them that Chainlink would be bouncing between $6-$7 in 2022.

[Anonymous No.51121293]

>>51121213
Yeah man it’s been a crazy shock. Very few saw it turning this sour. When you follow Chainlink obsessively you know that there is so much data out there pointing at where things are going, and even more than the price I think I am shocked at how few people still seem to have any understanding of Chainlink.
But if the dam keeps filling up it has to overflow eventually. It’s just a when not an if. So try to give yourself a bit more of a break while we watch it fill up, and wait.

[Anonymous No.51121308]

>>51121265
holy cope. how fucking beta do you have to be to seethe and whine and then type a whole paragraph to try and justify if after being shown how shortsighted and pathetic it is.

[Anonymous No.51121330]

>>51121308
2 more weeks. Trust the plan. Where are the breadcrumbs anon?

[Anonymous No.51121332]

>>51121163

Pretty much. I agree with other anon and thought the same for a while. This space did get more retarded after 2017. Thats because it went from tech nerds to actual normies. Makes sense right?

Anyway as far as im concerned on review we made the right decision. LINK is basically the beat performing asset since the 2018 bear market low. We made an informed decision and were correct. Basically nothing else survived, and those that did(very few) didnt out perform Link from that low.
We just have to be patient. The problem now is the global factor in markets being bearish and that normies in crypto are either in loss reduction mindset again(sell at less of a loss asap), capitulated, or accumulating their normie coins. So its hard for Chainlink to get a narrative and pump. Once it starts to it’ll stick out and thats the only place it can move forward from, but the conditions this time around are more difficult for that, partly because you have a bunch if twitter and /pol/ migrants who came and bought the LINK highs in the bullrun and now want to sell any rally they can stomach the level of loss for. We didnt have that headwind last time, each rally didnt get brutally sold off by people who were happy to accept a -40% instead of -60% after the pump. It didnt have enough price history at that point.

[Anonymous No.51121343]

>>51121265
You don’t have to be happy about it, anon, I’m sure as fuck not happy to be at $6.50 in 2022. But making peace with the fact that, overall, we are right, but that shit will take time and we will be subject to all sorts of fuckery in the interim, is an important point to get to. Seething makes time go slower, if anything, it makes the wait feel longer.
Accept that we’re all disappointed, we’re all demoralised, but also there’s no way in hell I’m selling this shit so what can you do? No point dwelling on it and hurting yourself, that solves nothing.

[Anonymous No.51121377]

>>51121330
the discord tranny can't help but immediately revert to his same tired talking points, not even trying to hide his intentions. pathetic

[Anonymous No.51121410]

>>51121332
>Thats because it went from tech nerds to actual normies. Makes sense right?
Correct, in hindsight it's obvious.
>>51121343
Yeah, it is what it is. I'm pretty annoyed and disappointed with where we're at, but when I'm not seething I'm trying to learn from the whole thing.

[Anonymous No.51121432]

Does anyone have the screenshot of Rory in discord talking about link tokens being transferred? I saw it today but I guess the thread died or I just can't find it.

[Anonymous No.51121591]

>>51121332
>This space did get more retarded after 2017. Thats because it went from tech nerds to actual normies.
Yep. We went from "scams for tech nerds" to "scams for normies". Once the space matures and the current "scams for normies" phase is done, we should see the projects with good fundamentals (ie. Link) actually gain more traction in the normiesphere.

[Anonymous No.51121795]

>>51121377
this checked. its literally a few discord trannies blogposting to consensus crack the thread. what a pack of untamed niggers

[Anonymous No.51121897]

>>51116339
>Former CEO of Google
>FORMER

Yikes and cringe. Is this really what we’re supposed to be excited about?

[Anonymous No.51121905]

>>51121897
who is we?

[Anonymous No.51122058]

>>51121410

I changed my expectations. I never expected staking till 2024 even back in 2018. Its coming earlier than I anticipated. So i never expected to be ballin till around then.

However what i didnt expect was to lag so far away from high prices. I thought we would be wt least working towards it in exponent. So a hundred bucks or something. Hell even 30 dollars would work on that exponential factor. 6 feels pretty abnormal.

That said i changed expectations. I view link as something i can retire on much earlier now. Working towards learning everything i need to host a node when the time comes. Webdev then crypto.

[Anonymous No.51122163]

>>51117828
Just bought 100k tickets

[Anonymous No.51122280]

>>51121905
All of the personalities that inhabit the posters estrogen addled body

[Anonymous No.51122301]

>>51122058
>Working towards learning everything i need to host a node when the time comes. Webdev then crypto.
I'd like to do that too, now that you mention it. Do you have any pointers on a place to start?

[Anonymous No.51122385]

>>51122301
Beyond the basics you should look into DevOps and building automation around how you run your node. You can look into running your node in a public cloud provider (e.g. AWS, Azure, GCP) which is probably going to be the "typical" way to run a node. You could even try study the AWS quickstart on running a Chainlink node, pretty sure they've got a basic CloudFormation template on standing up a node. Running a node will be non-trivial and won't just be a matter of starting a Docker container and running the core Chainlink node and some Postgres DB server. Ideally you want the following qualities for your node:
>Highly-reliable, fault tolerant
>Securely managed infrastructure
>Monitoring and alerting capabilities (so you can respond to any potential issues
>Automation capabilities around your operational requirements
First 2 are pretty obvious. The third one is going to be critical, because unexpected problems will always happen and to preserve your reputation as a node operator you'll need to resolve any issues as soon as possible. The last one is also important, you need to be able to maintain the software and infrastructure on your node. So whether it's upgrading the core Chainlink node software, or ensuring that your host machine is patched and secure from any known security vulnerabilities, these are all things you'll need to be on top of to run a high-quality node.

[Anonymous No.51122401]

>>51122385
Thanks anon. This is some good chit.

[Anonymous No.51122546]

>>51122301

Learn web development. Javascript, then solidity. Cloud and web hosting. Smart contract stuff. Still on Javascript atm.
Probably Javascript isnt that necessary but its a foundation and solidity is based on it.

[Anonymous No.51122855]

>>51116339
>Fireside chat with Eric Schmidt and Sergey
glowniggers
>Talk with SWFT and DTCC
>buuuuuuuuuurp
more glowniggers
glowniggers tongue my anus

[Anonymous No.51123055]

>>51116339
Fireside chat with Sergey. Omg. I cant wait to hear the same phrases Sergey has been using the last 3 years. I swear I have heard NOTHING new out of his mouth, you could take his twitter appearance yesterday and compare it to videos 3 years ago it would be the same.

I thought he was high intelligence, but I actually have to revise this. I think he is just normie intelligent, 110-120 IQ max.

[Anonymous No.51123070]

>>51117316
>Update: "FSS inaction"

No refunds

[Anonymous No.51123296]

>>51118487
Like three twitter accounts understand anything. The rest are retarded. CLG is in that group.

[Anonymous No.51123307]

>>51116339
utterly baffling how there's zero hype for how big sirgay's corpo dick is from crypto normoids, chainlink rules the entire industry

[Anonymous No.51123318]

>>51123307
the average age of a crypto holder is in their teens
the average age of a person who knows what SWIFT or the DTCC is used to be in their sixties, but the GME debacle has skewed the numbers downwards. either way there's an information and interest gap the size of the gap between the earth and moon

[Anonymous No.51123346]

>>51122385
In my opinion, having worked with DevOps professionally, it's more work than the consensus thinks. I've pivoted into creating smart contract platforms that get paid in LINK and outsourcing the node operations to the market

[Anonymous No.51123378]

We are so royally fucked at this stage i’m so mentally exhausted from it all I am finding it funny.
So many stupid cunts just can’t figure out that CCIP and staking are NOT getting announced at smartcon. When they see it and the disappointment happens I imagine sentiment tanks to atl and we probably go $2 range if not lower.
Fuck you serg you fat sack of disgusting obese shit, believing one word out of your mouth was the worst judgement of someone i have ever made in my life. Thanks for the costly lesson, I clearly needed it

[Anonymous No.51123400]

>>51120274
it means they are dumping bags on the market and hope bag buyers will slurp it up for staking

[Anonymous No.51123401]

All this negative sentiment from 'OG's makes me incredbly bullish.

[Anonymous No.51123417]

>>51123307
>chainlink runs the entire industry
Literally rank 26 and declining. Smartcon struggling to sell tickets, ccip and staking delays going to cause us to dump even more. Yea pretty comfy over here as chainlink has 0 progress from 3 years ago

[Anonymous No.51123432]

>>51123401
OGs remember that the only time we’ve been provided a date for anything was a Q2/Q3 2018 prediction for mainnet that didn’t happen until a year later.
Everyone screeches for roadmaps and deadlines and then screeches even harder when they don’t get met. They literally cause the problem then complain about it. Chainlink isn’t going to ship something half baked just to pacify your non-contributing moonboy hysteria. Cope.
tl:dr TTOYNN

[Anonymous No.51123459]

need a CardanoCon shoop with all the same guests but have sergey swapped out with charles

[Anonymous No.51123482]

>>51122546
>js not not needed
>html not needed
>css not needed
Youre giving bad advice.
For operating nodes you need to understand how ethereum, tcp/ip, http, some scripting language (python/bash), virtual machines and more specifically virtual servers on cloud platforms, site reliability engineering / devops works

[Anonymous No.51123500]

>>51123432
I also remember
>1keoy
For five years straight, unironically.
There are people who were so convinced that link was bulletproof way to make it so they stopped developing themselves or even just NEETed. Those people are fucked lmao

[Anonymous No.51123522]

>>51122385
isn't joining a big pool on binance/coinbase/Linkpool easier?

[Anonymous No.51123579]

>>51123401
That's a way to see it.
Powel may have made the you will suffer speech because of Sergey's Town Hall the day before...

However their ability to overestimate the patience of investors for their features can be seen as a main cause for the market sentiment.
A standard "investor" in these market has a 3-6 months time horizon.
People will start buying up Chainlink when they will know they have 6 months left to accumulate before staking takes all the liquidity away or if they believe there is a great change in the token economics.

The initial v0.1 staking release may not achieve this with the 75 million token cap.
It will only give a glimpse of what will come later and start the change of the token economics.

Some people here view Sergey as a god and can't imagine him making mistakes or his team having unplanned issues and delays.
But that's exactly what keeps happening even if some of that came from ETH fucking up.
Not getting a clear communication on the source of those delays and the state of their internal development doesn't make them look like gods but like people who are trying to hide their problems.
Makes it hard to relate to them.

Imagine what would happen to ADA if Charles made one interview in January and slowly released small clips from it over the course of the next 8 months.
This may be the 4chan effect, but I suspect Sergey dislikes repeating things and doing intensive communication which is ironic when he spent years reusing the same slides.

[Anonymous No.51123626]

>>51123579
They don’t need you to relate to them. On the list of priority parties that Chainlink has to attend to, “moonboy NEET drama queens” are really, really fucking low.
There’s a strategic consideration in regards to every single communication you make. Everything that your moonboys hear, your enemies hear too. There are very valid reasons to play your cards close, more so when you’re going for very big prizes.

[Anonymous No.51123633]

>>51123579
when are people going to realize that people holding link are not "investors". the team does not care about us holding the tokens. in fact, sergey likely sees the ones complaining as ungrateful leeches.
but yeah, the team has zero interest and zero obligation to anyone who owns them. they just don't care, they dumped lots during the bull market last year and will be set.
they couldn't care less about "market" sentiment

[Anonymous No.51123662]

>>51123482

Probably. I actually want to do web development too though. If he just wants to learn node hosting for LINK and devoos probably can skip js all together

[Anonymous No.51123688]

>>51117089
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

[Anonymous No.51123760]

>>51123626
Not sure about that now that their token is at $6 and even their institutional investors don't want to touch it.
Their funds will eventually run out if they don't deliver something after deciding to ignore their investors.

However this changes the way investors consider Chainlink which is the cause for the horrible price action.
The possibility for Chainlink to reach 4 digits decreases with time as people understand the reason why this is less likely to happen.
You will never get an Elon effect from Sergey and only get accurate prices for the perceived value of the token.
This current real value is $0 with a perceived value of $6.

You don't buy a public good because it's public.
If it wasn't it would be private.

The biggest issue for long term investors is that they wasted far too much energy and time on this project and can't easily move this focus away to something else.
But time will eventually solve this issue as more people lose hope.

Trade Chainlink like you would Cardano and everything will be fine.
Both are not finished projects with the same issue of overpromising and underdelivering.

[Anonymous No.51123798]

>>51123633
It's true we were parasites.
One solution to this is to become traders instead of investors and help the market find the correct value for the token.
As traders the correct decision would have been to copy Nexo and keep shorting this project with a useless token in the past year.

I will keep this in mind for the future and look for the next opportunity to short this token when Sergey makes a new promise he delays and may long it before an important event or release to bring liquidity to late buyers.
Then I will stop being a parasite and deliver value to the market.

[Anonymous No.51123835]

>>51123798
can you explain what you mean a bit more I dont follow

[Anonymous No.51123846]

>>51123633
>>51123626
The big realization these delusional link holders need to have is that buying a token does NOT mean you have any stake in the company like a share. Its not even like Bitcoin, where the protocol cant be changed.

Chainlink has zero obligation to do anything, the token can go to zero and they wouldnt care, or they could just create another 10 billion tokens out of thin air and dilute your stack. Theres NOTHING that prevents them from doing that, no law, no nothing.
Link holders are literal gamblers that hope someone else is more stupid to buy their shitcoin. Chainlink may have a product but that has zero legal connection to the token, so buying the Chainlink token is very similar to just buying Dogecoin or Shibainu.

[Anonymous No.51123852]

>>51123846
some really interesting thoughts anon. could you explain what you mean a bit more?

[Anonymous No.51123880]

>>51123835
>>51123846
Hey.. I recognize Nexo paid shills.
The correct action to do as traders is to take the money from Nexo stuck in a bad short by short squeezing them for a second time.

[Anonymous No.51123889]

>>51116339
So it’s basically like a high school job fair where big time companies send reps to just say hello this is who we are and this is what we do. 3rd conference in a row everyone is going to be left disappointed. What a mess

[Anonymous No.51123902]

>>51123880
I dont follow... could you provide a long and indepth post detailing your thoughts and emotional state? preferably over several posts by your ID

[Anonymous No.51124044]

>>51123760
You are incorrect anon. I don’t buy Chainlink as an investment. I buy it is a way to use their system easier. The same way people buy etherium for gas fees for shitcoins is the same way people will be buying LINK for things relating to real world data. I personally think the project will accomplish great things as well as the Chainlink token will be a good asset to hold. Im not buying it with the intention of selling it for dollars. Im buying it with the intention of being able to use the system at ease in the future once it takes a larger holding over peoples lives

[Anonymous No.51124053]

>>51123880
Nah not a nexo shill. Just want to warn LINK bagholders atleast get some money out of this project before they sell at 2 dollar or less and cry why no one warned them.

You have been warned now.

[Anonymous No.51124055]

>>51124044
To add onto this, believers who truly understand Sergeys vision are not buying to make a quick buck. They are buying into a new territory of technology. It is actually very similar to people investing in the early internet when you look at Chainlink and Google. Both of them took a long time to get started and both were just random shitcoins in a bubble.

[Anonymous No.51124061]

>>51124053
Sounds good to me, I’ll be able to buy more at a cheaper price. We are still in speculation until staking and CCIP is released. Once they are and if they’re reliable companies, organizations, institutions and wealthy individuals will try to capitalize on this.

[Anonymous No.51124072]

>>51123760

I know what you are saying but zoom out a little. This is peak depressed investor sentiment. Im a dec 2017 OG and even im delaying my previously conservative timeline (2025 for $1000 eoy) to some point in the future which no longer matters. I’ll just retire with it.
Im actively teaching myself dev now to get a job. Even im manifesting this peak depression of investor sentiment.

Cliche but true. Amazon took years. Even microsoft did. Thats the norm

[Anonymous No.51124106]

>>51124072
How much fucking longer do I have to wait? It's been 5 years and I'm completely suicidal and depressed, My 10k stack is barely worth fucking anything and I can't stake it for any profit while my money is dwindling to nothing. At this point I truly believe we're not breaking ath again for maybe 3 years and I'm not prepared to wait that long when BTC and ETH holders made it in less than 3 years. This is so unfair.

[Anonymous No.51124116]

>>51124106
Stop bitching please, if you’re not larping then either accumulate more or just do something else for awhile.

[Anonymous No.51124124]

I found it weird how the very first thing Sergey talked about yesterday was his thanks to the community.

[Anonymous No.51124138]

>>51124116
I have every right to be furious. Sergey keeps us in the dark and treats us like shit when it's our investments that have funded this project. Did you hear how arrogant he was in that twitter spaces to that moderator where he revealed absolutely nothing about staking and barely anything about smartcon. If nothing is revealed at smartcon next month that will be the final straw and I'm selling my link at any price and walking away from this garbage project. There will be another competent oracle service that will replace chainlink, I'm sure.

[Anonymous No.51124160]

>>51124138
sers

[Anonymous No.51124166]

>>51124106

5 years is fucking nothing. Get over yourself man. Crypto has deluded too many people.
You are falling for the biggest smoothbrain trap by thinking because some random jeet made it with shiba or obamasonichunigger coin in 1 year that you are suffering after 5.
In reality almost nobody makes it like that. They sell too early which ja the logical thing to do on shitcoins like that(who with a brain holds after a 10,000% gain? Noobs) or they hold long past the top and make nothing.

If we make it in a decade with LINK thats MUCH MORE typical when you think of these kind of investments over the past 45 years

[Anonymous No.51124186]

>>51120248
Really not true that eth is dumping more. If anything it's just link fighting a massive bottom and if it falls through things are utterly fucked.

[Anonymous No.51124188]

>>51124166
I don't want to make it in a decade when I'm fucking 33, I wanna make it in the next 5 years. I saw BTC holders make it almost instantly, the same thing happened with ETH holders... so many others made it this bullrun instantly with FTM/AVAX/DOGE/SHIB and other shitcoins while I just watched bagholding chainlink all the way from $52 to $5. What was I thinking? It'll never pump... I had $520k on the table and I just left it there. Never again.

[Anonymous No.51124190]

>>51124138
He absolutely has reasons for being silent. There is groups actively trying to fuck Chainlink over to make money from shorts. Any endeavor in the human world will be met with an enemy ANY. There are people who don’t even know what Chainlink is but want it to fail so their shorts make them money. Sergey absolutely has reasons to wait for a day to officially release something.

[Anonymous No.51124208]

>>51120274
I also seem to recall they said Q3 for first staking aspects. I think it was in a post discussing the token release for it.

To be honest though Q3/4 doesn't bother me, what bothers me is that they're splitting it up into such tiny parts seemingly in order to *just* get some aspect through the door in 2022. We should be so beyond that point.

[Anonymous No.51124210]

>>51124188
you should sell. i'm completely serious. don't hold something that just makes you miserable. put your money into something that will actually appreciate over a reasonable amount of time. it's not too late. you don't have to go down with the ship.

[Anonymous No.51124216]

>>51124188
From the sound of it, you have no idea what Chainlink actually does. You most likely were roped in by an anon that was telling everyone to buy it. I apologize for that anon, Chainlink isn’t something that will make you rich overnight, it just isn’t. If you don’t understand the technology you are probably better off selling for a shitcoin. Chainlink is a complex system that is aiming to assist even more complicated financial systems. Without a grasp of these things and a “wen moon” attitude you are destined to fail holding this.

[Anonymous No.51124218]

>>51117089
>swift handles international settlements to the tune of 5 trillion a day
>dtcc handles security issue/settlements to the tune of 4 trillion a day
>swift's GPI and dtcc's project ion are both using R3 corda and link oracles

its unreal how deaf the crypto community is. go look at speakers for any other crypto convention, its all tv/twitter celebrities and crypto companies. sergey is actually bringing in the people who make this world run to his conference.

[Anonymous No.51124220]

>>51124210
Chainlink is the only thing I have left at this point. It either succeeds and I make it or it fails and I kill myself. I can't sell at this point because it's my last gamble. I hope Sergey can pull off his grand vision but I'm having my doubts.

[Anonymous No.51124226]

>>51120403
I mean we both know this sort of justification of poor price performance is desperate cope. Every shitcoin or GME holder reasons that malicious shadow organisations are conspiring to keep the price low and any day now they will fail but we can see it as frankly just sad desperation in any other community but fall to it ourselves. I've never bought the bulgarians dumping btc to hurt link line but I have tried to make myself believe the team has been deliberately quiet in order to take over the industry and I now see that as a deluded cope too.

[Anonymous No.51124234]

>>51124188

>im 33

Doesnt matter bro. Sucks for you. Sucks more for someone whos 45. Your lucky you found link early at all. Lifes unfair man but at least you will actually make it.

There are probably less than 1000 people who will make it with Link 10k stack who are only like 20-25 by then

[Anonymous No.51124241]

>>51124218
>>dtcc handles security issue/settlements to the tune of 4 trillion a day
Didn’t they have 1,7 quads in 2009? It’s crazy how if Link even has 10% of all those transactions it could be at 17.000 € a token.

[Anonymous No.51124251]

>>51121169
The community outreach has always been shit and solely focused on cringe numerology code. I think it's because they "want" to interact with us in the sense it gives some financial benefit but hate most of what we actually talk about or do. So they never mention /biz/, never frogs, obviously no fat sergey, gay muslim sergey, nigger on the blockchain etc etc. But they do constantly just make "significant" numbers as if detached from anything else those mean anything. I've always found it very "how do you do fellow kids" tier.

[Anonymous No.51124269]

>>51124226
>but I have tried to make myself believe the team has been deliberately quiet in order to take over the industry and I now see that as a deluded cope too.
That one makes sense considering who their advisor is.

[Anonymous No.51124273]

>>51124072
I understand.
Waiting for the next months in the current state of the market to see what comes out may be the most difficult thing to do.

I could have been a smart contract dev in a different life.
It's really interesting and full of possibilities, but I left my work as a dev after a burnout destroyed my desire to be one forever.
I loved developing software so much before, but I think this may have come from my desire to have control over something because I was powerless to control my own life.
After changing my mindset this desire seems to have disappeared and my desire to be a slave working for someone else went with it too.
There may be a part of me which hopes I can restart this as a hobby one day, but I am forced to learn investing and trading instead because I will never be able to get paid more as a developer than as a trader and investor now and my love for technology has been destroyed.

I keep seeing the mail they sent with the SmartCon builder reduced price ticket, and wonder if my life could have been different.

The irony in this is that I am considering becoming a real estate investor instead to get real returns with less volatility and risks than crypto despite initially disliking this field.
My current income comes from real estate and allows me to sleep better than when I was all in crypto.

>>51124124
I need to rewatch the youtube video.
Do you have a timestamp for that moment?
Someone should make a clip of it.

[Anonymous No.51124280]

>>51124241
They would make their own before outsourcing it to someone else

[Anonymous No.51124294]

>>51124241
Yeah, but right now it has 0% of those transactions.
I think Link will eventually capture a large amount of these transactions, but it’s a long ways off.

If you were a decision make at the level where you could switch your system to using Chainlink, would you?
If you didn’t know anything about it and someone showed you one of these rambling, pontificating speeches the team puts out where Sergey is sat in front of a retarded zoom background in his office, you’d say “these jokers aren’t able to handle anything”

I buy Link every week, and I’ll keep doing it until it hits 3 digits, but we need to be realistic about the timeline.

[Anonymous No.51124314]

>>51123055
I remember some alt hype video that tangentially went into 'billionaire' intelligence and it isn't linear. In fact as you get into genius tier (135+) you start to see huge variance in outcome as some just start going into outright weird, artistic or autistic shit as often as they just work hard. In terms of financial success the top people are 120-130 IQ range with other qualities that push them to be extraverted, hugely self confident and work driven. It's far from saying they're not smart, but they don't typically represent the absolute peak of intelligence.

[Anonymous No.51124337]

>>51124210
thats even worse if you sell and you see it moon thats real suicide fuel
you have to face the fact that you are in too deep to stop and have to slug out the misery in the mean time, there is no alternative

[Anonymous No.51124340]

>>51123459
charles does enough talking to fill an entire con, ive never seen another human that enjoys the sound of their own voice so much

[Anonymous No.51124345]

>>51124218
>>51124241
I would like to understand how their system is implemented and the design behind it.
Will stocks be tokenized and will we be able to withdraw them to our wallets like we do with ERC20 tokens currently?

This would make naked short selling a lot more difficult, if exchanges were forced to use proof of reserve and people could quickly organize a "bank run".

This could create a great moment to long shorted meme stocks like GME if we get a date for the official release.
This could be a good idea to make money from the DTCC switch to the blockchain.

[Anonymous No.51124348]

>>51124188
> in a decade when im 33
You're 23 lmao, you have loads of time

[Anonymous No.51124359]

>>51124241
These sorts of posts are just useless

[Anonymous No.51124366]

>>51124269
I think we've seen by the fact he's just doing a fireside chat that he's not in any instrumental role to be driving policy to that degree. But moreover my thought they were doing that long preceded Schmidt coming around.

[Anonymous No.51124390]

>>51117089
this 100% holy shit cultists BTFO

[Anonymous No.51124397]

>>51124337

Its interesting how the concept of suicide stack has been completely lost now. Another sign of absolute depression of investor sentiment

[Anonymous No.51124403]

Imagine being able to receive a special 1% extra interest or airdrops if you stake the GME token on the official GME platform instead of leaving it on exchanges doing the short selling.
This could offer a lot more possibilities to even the battle field between big funds and retail.

[Anonymous No.51124435]

>>51124397
Ironic that in 2022 it's become "how not to commit suicide if you've spent the last 5 years just stacking link"

[Anonymous No.51124446]

>>51124397
its just the general state of the market, everybody was expecting a repeat of 2017 even if with a lower amplitude, but then may happened and china dumped on all our asses
on any longer term timeframe big boys are buying your assets up cheaply right now because you panicked, do you really think btc being added to aladdin is just a silly pr stunt
in the end depression comes down to personal circumstances: i didn't get as high as i thought but acquired enough to escape the cage so i am holding comfy no really giving a fuck, but if you are stuck in clown corpo world and saw your ticket out of there burned in front of your face right at the exit turnstile i can get the suicidal depression sentiment
for me however i am just seeing an opportunity to accumulate more then i initially thought i could

[Anonymous No.51124475]

>>51124226
>I've never bought the bulgarians dumping btc to hurt link line
nice try. you're more subtle than most of them

[Anonymous No.51124582]

>>51124138
>There will be another competent oracle service that will replace chainlink
sure bro, any second now

[Anonymous No.51124587]

>>51124226
>in order to take over the industry
but they did anon, quite impressively so and completely silent
link was entirely speculative until the summer of defi, there with only a fraction of its full potential it dominated the oracle market and crushed all its competition
even more interesting is that any other crypto dev lead would take this moment to scream his accomplishments from the rooftops and initiate ponzi tokenomics to make himself rich
sergei didn't do any of that demonstrating that the team behind it still sees far greater value in the future then a quick pump and dump today

dont doubt for a moment that link will achieve its goals in the future, there is only short term price action in the now
you are fretting about getting a better buy in, but dca'ing in is always an option

[Anonymous No.51124635]

>>51124587
>5 years
>$6 dollars

Shut the fuck up, that's a massive failure for crypto.
Everyone's in crypto to make money and Chainlink has failed miserably.
Dead coin.

[Anonymous No.51124658]

>>51124124
Why? It was a community round table event created by someone in marketing to get more frogs to come to smartcon. Why would it surprise you that he started by thanking the group he was addressing?

[Anonymous No.51124664]

>>51124635
I just bought 282 LINK, increasing my stack to 1576 and I am NOT selling.

[Anonymous No.51124724]

>>51124664
Thanks for providing the exit liquidity for the team!

https://etherscan.io/address/0x3264225f2fd3bb8d5dc50587ea7506aa8638b966#tokentxns
https://etherscan.io/address/0x57ec4745258e5a4c73d1a82636dc0fe291e3ee9f#tokentxns
https://etherscan.io/address/0x276f695b3b2c7f24e7cf5b9d24e416a7f357adb7#tokentxns

Binance deposit address of the Chainlink team:
https://etherscan.io/address/0x9b1c1752b6b6eaf62a8c491a8681b32c1f7ecde9#tokentxns

I hope this was sold to a big whale like Eric Schmidt OTC.

[Anonymous No.51124729]

>>51124220
so then why are you whining? you can't have it every way. take some responsibility for yourself and your life, instead of putting everything in others hands and then crying the entire time. follow your heart, sell, and atleast you will be able to sleep at night knowing your fate is in your own hands.

[Anonymous No.51124833]

>>51124635
>Dead coin
all defi runs on it, price action =/= utility
there is a reason anons make the amazon comparison

[Anonymous No.51125008]

>>51124833
defi is literally and unironically insolvent
>there is a reason
yes, it's called delusion

[Anonymous No.51125042]

>>51118452
>he doesn't care one bit about any token
we all used to belive that to, the team is not acting like they care about the truth. They are saying one thing back peddling then dumping tokens

[Anonymous No.51125092]

>>51124724
Fucking kek they wouldn't sell now if they knew it would go up ... its gonna drop to $1 soon.

[Anonymous No.51125095]

>>51125008
you should short then, might i suggest 50x leverage

[Anonymous No.51125187]

>>51125008
This. The liquidity is terrible. Seriously look at etherscan and check out the top wallets of the most valuable protocols. Some of them have 6-7 figures liquidity for the entire protocol. No way banks/hedge funds want to touch the kiddie pool

[Anonymous No.51125275]

>>51124724
>17.5 million LINK dumped at less than $7
This is just sad. I am never selling but every day I find new levels of demoralization.

[Anonymous No.51125362]

>>51125275
It could be used for obfuscation and we have no proof they sold at that price.