/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.51106628]

xrp

[Anonymous No.51106634]

on coinbase

[Anonymous No.51106660]

>>51106634
wen?

[Anonymous No.51106668]

prove it

[sage No.51106669]

it's already on coinbase idiot

[Anonymous No.51106671]

>>51106660

lawsuit is gonna be settled in about 2 weeks

XRP will be cleared and will replace Swift by November 2022

ISO20022

[Anonymous No.51106685]

>>51106671

[Anonymous No.51106784]

>>51106671
trust in the plan

[Anonymous No.51106827]

>>51106784
SWIFT moves around $5 trillion dollars per day. $5 trillion divided by 100 billion XRP = $50 dollars per XRP, and this is assuming that SWIFT owned all the supply.

XRP will handle much more than SWIFT; it will eliminate the need for nostro accounts (worth $27 trillion), tap into the $2.7 quadrillion global transfer market, as well as interact with other blockchains and technologies. In other words, if XRP’s price was low, it wouldn’t be able to handle the trillions/quadrillions within its 100 billion coins.

XRP will likely be pegged to precious metals and/or a basket of assets to make the price even more stable and liquid over time, likely by governments, central banks, and institutions like the IMF.

Market cap is the multiplication of last trading price x circulating supply.

In other words, someone could create a coin with a 100 billion supply and buy a few of the coins for $11 dollars and its market cap would exceed a trillion dollars. Does this mean that a trillion dollars have been pumped into the coin? No, not even a hundred dollars, yet its market cap is over a trillion. This simple example illustrates how naïve market cap discussions are when it comes to crypto.

XRP’s price will be determined by utility, not by market cap. For example, SWIFT moves around $5 trillion dollars per day. $5 trillion divided by 100 billion XRP = $50 dollars per coin, and this is assuming that SWIFT owned all the supply. XRP is going after more than just SWIFT, it is going after a $2.7+ quadrillion market. Market cap means nothing.

[Anonymous No.51107448]

>>51106671

[Anonymous No.51107483]

>>51106827
>spends his whole post trying to explain potential marketcap of XRP
>then says it doesn't mean anything

[Anonymous No.51107494]

>>51107483
kek indeed

what a fag

[Anonymous No.51107563]

>>51106827
XRP settles in 3-5 secs not 1 year. Maybe the same XRP might be used multiple times per year. If so the price you have predicted would be much lower.

[Anonymous No.51107771]

>>51106827
>someone could create a coin with a 100 billion supply and buy a few of the coins for $11 dollars and its market cap would exceed a trillion dollars

I refuse to believe you can possibly be this stupid.
Market Cap is calculated by share price x outstanding shares yes?

Do you know what this means? Outstanding shares is the coins held by investors so based on your brilliant analogy lets say someone buys 100 coins at $11 that gives you a MC of $1,100.

Congrats on that, seriously...

[Anonymous No.51107849]

>>51107771
not in crypto

[Anonymous No.51107866]

>>51106827
You forget that the same zerp can be used for (conservatively at 5 seconds a tx) 12 per minute x 60 per hour x 24 per day = 17,280 times per day.

So divide all your price predictions by 17,280
Coincidentally this is basically exactly HALF of the schizo $37,500 number.
So we will be at $2-3 XRP and all that volume is easily handled with even just $10 XRP.
$10XRP basically makes anything possible given the extreme efficiency of the XRPL.

[Anonymous No.51107911]

>>51107866
didnt read lol

[Anonymous No.51108015]

>>51107911
You for sure did. Why bother with a charade.
Your response basically guarantees you read it.
I passed most comments itt without reading.
I DID NOT COMMENT on them.
That is the tip off.
>inb4 didn't read this either
Then how you know it's me?

[Anonymous No.51108051]

i see yellow id starting with Z and I automaticly ignore

[Anonymous No.51108103]

XRP to the moon, we gonna make it boys and girls

[Anonymous No.51108113]

>>51108103
based

[Anonymous No.51108156]

>>51107849
>not in crypto
okay, good luck with your mental gymnastics. Don't forget to send a cease and desist to coinmarketcap, coingecko and defil llama, oh, and messari too...

[Anonymous No.51108732]

XRP is the standard. Non-XRP holders on suicide watch :D

[Anonymous No.51109374]

>>51108156
It looks like gymnastics to you because you are a mental cripple. To everybody else, it's just walking.

[Anonymous No.51109494]

>>51108732
kek baggies

[Anonymous No.51109524]

The entire crypto run was designed to appeal to zoomers and millennials that lost the ability to distinguish reality from playing too many video games.

[Anonymous No.51109585]

>>51106628
Give it to me straight, boss.
I have 15k XRP.
How rich will I be in 2025?

[Anonymous No.51109618]

>>51109585
how do $150 sound to you?

[Anonymous No.51109818]

>>51109524
Projection, pic related is you.

[Anonymous No.51110193]

>>51109374
XRP price
May 2017 - 0.34¢
Aug 2022 - 0.34¢
yes, that's still cents, thanks for play though, enjoy poverty!

[Anonymous No.51110627]

>>51109524
Memes are programming instructions for NPCs. You basically just admitted your scripting is broken and easily triggered.

You can free yourself. You just have to give up on the idea that your emotional states constitute a moral identity or paradigm.

[Anonymous No.51110651]

>>51110193
Tell that to Valhil capital. Somehow I trust his team of lawyers and economists more than your disney memes.

[Anonymous No.51110698]

>>51106671

[Anonymous No.51110724]

>>51109585
How does $15 sound to you?

[Anonymous No.51111682]

>>51106628
XRP AND HBAR ON COINBASE NEXT MONTH!!

Stack AMAP now, the rocket IS taking off!!

[Anonymous No.51111710]

>>51106671
I trust the plan

[Anonymous No.51112006]

>>51111682
>Stack AMAP
AMP?

[Anonymous No.51112252]

>>51111682
I just moved my xrp to hbar to catch the pump

i know they announced hbar, but there is absolutely no evidence we are any closer to relisting for xrp, although xls20d doesn't have much longer, maybe we do see that coincide with other events

[WSB No.51112635]

Haha blurpies.

[Anonymous No.51113235]

>>51108015
I didn’t read this

[Anonymous No.51113454]

[Anonymous No.51113597]

>>51106671
SWIFT iso incorporating ISO20022 not getting replaced by it