/GME/ - Comfy Thursday Late Night Edition

[Anonymous No.50867997]

>Basic Information
https://gme.crazyawesomecompany.com
https://finra-markets.morningstar.com/MarketData/EquityOptions/detail.jsp?query=14%3A0P000002CH
https://gmetimeline.com (up to 2021)

>Daily reminder
https://streamable.com/bzilp4

>Mandatory study time
>The Everything Short
reddit.com/r/GME/comments/mgucv2/the_everything_short
>^watch-along
https://youtu.be/AaalT8rn9lc
>Naked Short Selling and Systemic Risk
https://youtu.be/FCiL4v7_z9E
>Failure to deliver
https://youtu.be/I0WXg5T3cBE

>SEC 10-K Annual report
https://sec.report/Document/0001326380-22-000021
>GameStop Investor, NFT, & Wallet Sites
https://investor.gamestop.com/home
https://nft.gamestop.com
https://wallet.gamestop.com/

>What will happen if Citadel becomes insolvent?
DTCC with 60T USD, will pay as the final boss with FDIC as the insurance

>Real-Time Trades
https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/GME/latest-real-time-trades
https://eresearch.fidelity.com/eresearch/gotoBL/fidelityTopOrders.jhtml
>Current Trade Halts + Short Restrictions
http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=TradeHalts
https://www.nyse.com/markets/nyse-arca/notices

>All other news/DDs/etc
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stag_hunt
https://prospect.org/power/how-the-gamestop-hustle-worked
https://computershared.net/?bot=drsbot
reddit.com/r/DDintoGME/comments/mnss65/the_apes_guide_to_the_galaxy_a_compilation_of_dds
reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/pb22oj/the_puzzle_pieces_of_quarterly_movements_equity
reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/pmj9yk/i_found_the_entire_naked_shorting_game_plan
reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ptvaka/when_you_wish_upon_a_star_a_complete_guide_to
https://gmedd.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/GMEdd-GameStopValuation-16Nov21-1.pdf
>Temporary alliance with reddit and jews to take down other jews, we can go back to hating each other later
>reddit DDs don't take them for fact use your brain
>Check your broker and clearing house to ensure you're not rugpulled

Last time on /GME/: >>50864676

As always:
>sneed hedgies

[Anonymous No.50868002]

>>50867997
Still comfy waitin' and holdin'.

>Summary

GameStop Info
>Complete corporate revamp by Ryan Cohen
>Ongoing hiring spree of specialists of e-commerce, UI, UX, blockchain and supply chain operations
>Debt free with positive increases and reductions (see ER); $1.035 billion cash and cash equivalents on hand + high inventory
>Intent to launch NFT marketplace by end of Q2 FY '22 (May-July)

DRS & Computershare
>12.7 million shares DRS'd by Apr. 30th 2022
>Previously 8.9 million shares by Jan. 29th 2022 and 5.2 mill by Oct. 30th 2021

Unfuddable
>Shorts never closed and there exists more fakes than real shares
>'MOASS' is a matter of time

Further information can found by reading the OP or DYOR!
Reply to this pasta for any confusion.

WGAMI!

Other news/reminders:
Wednesday RRP: 2,177.646B, 96P = 22.684B per (roughly)
Thursday RRP: 2,199.247B, 103P = 21.352B per (roughly)

www.rosenlegal.com/media/casestudy/2289_Robinhood%20-%20Initial%20Complaint%20-%20Market%20Manipulation%204835-8623-1514%20v.2.pdf
>GME shorted percentage of float as of Jan. 15th, 2021: 226.42%
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.590042/gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.416.0.pdf
>HF and broker class action lawsuit evidence
www.sec.gov/files/staff-report-equity-options-market-struction-conditions-early-2021.pdf
>SEC GME/meme stocks report
>
https://wallet.gamestop.com/
>GameStop Crypto Wallet available for download on Chrome
investor.gamestop.com/node/19776/html
investor.gamestop.com/node/19781/html
>FY22 Q1 results report is out
https://investor.gamestop.com/node/19826/html
>Four-for-One Stock Split - Form of a stock dividend
>(Record: July 18, 2022; Dist. after closing on 21st)
nft.gamestop.com beta marketplace is now open to the public.

https://pdfhost.io/v/05TEEk3U6_MOV_GME_Comparison_Doc
>100 page comparison DD

Please don't feed spammers and sliders.

[E No.50868016]

[Z No.50868044]

>>50868016
the end is near.
do not believe me.
i was never here.

[E No.50868050]

Why do GME baggies want to stay poor?
BBBY is right there making money and your Jew bought in
What’s your excuse?

[Anonymous No.50868052]

Friendly reminder that it literally doesn't matter if you have 1 share or 99,999 shares, if you sell at 210 or if you sell at 210,000,000,000. The squeeze is going to hit and reddit has decided to hold for an infinity pool and see just how high the numbers can go. Whether you participate with any of your shares or not, this is happening when we squeeze, and no amount of bitching and moaning in these threads will do literally a single thing about it, except to make sure that the bitchers and the moaners are the only people GUARANTEED to miss out on the top.

From another anon RE: government intervention
>If the government intervening is a legitimate possibility then it is in everyone best interest to hold to see what price that is because selling before that will limit your gains. In that sense the infinity pool isn’t literally the infinity pool it is the “let’s see how high the government will let it go pool”. Again that’s only if you truly believe the government will interfere. Which I don’t think they would dare.

This One's for the Holders -
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJ2F8wyp1upt34oCcSDNgFl1xao9fET6-

To the Hedgies: Here's Looking at you from 1,000 Feet Below -
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJ2F8wyp1upuzhDOs1HKlIu6KjqkYnsQT

Designated Shitting Playlist -
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJ2F8wyp1upvWno8-UtXG1FkyxNMIOfAM

This One's for the Holders on Spotify -
https://open.spotify.com/playlist/5u3Z5pCOcRxiS1NUj6nihW?si=M9TK8-DOTsOG7welKUGJpw&utm_source=copy-link&nd=1

[Anonymous No.50868078]

A lotta shills out right now. Must mean it'll go up tomorrow.

[Anonymous No.50868087]

Buy DRS hodl friends. Don't be left behind by being payed "fair market value" at your broker.

[Anonymous No.50868107]

>>50868087

Gotta say, 20-75% isn't exactly compelling

[Anonymous No.50868108]

Kek Shillies

[Anonymous No.50868123]

Jesus christ you're all a bunch of idiots.

Swaps and baskets don't intrinsically tie together the prices of the underlying securities, they only affect the collateral obligations of the entities holding the swaps.

[Anonymous No.50868150]

>>50868123
>he doesn't know

[Anonymous No.50868158]

>>50868107
That is actually profound. Everyone is supposed to own everything that they pay for. The implication being if you don't put your name on it, you might get F'd in the A.

[Anonymous No.50868179]

>>50867997
Daily reminder that
>MOASS will happen
>Trump will get back into office
>3 letter agencies will lose many court cases to the supreme court, including the IRS, and they will be abolished
>Globalists are ramping up draconian behavior because they are scared
>((they)) are the old elite and therefore, do not matter, as they will be feddy max prisoners anyway
>GME holders are the new elite and we will usher the world into a new era of peace and prosperity and we will lead the human to be better humans, instead of slave cattle.
>All of ((their)) secrets will be found out, documented and taught to all generations in every part of the globe so people know just how sick and demented ((they)) are

[Anonymous No.50868180]

>>50868016
buying more $80 BBBY calls tomorrow
sneed faggot

[Anonymous No.50868193]

>>50868123
...
They're not swapping portfolio managers similar to that show 'Wife Swap'?

[Anonymous No.50868198]

>>50868044
>death death
Oh no.

[Anonymous No.50868203]

>>50868158

No, I understand that. She isn't saying that 20-75% don't actually own their shares. She's saying that there is a 20-75% chance that it is occurring at any level. That level of certainty might as well be "I don't know". Maybe I'm misunderstanding her intent, though.

[Anonymous No.50868233]

Post MOASS I'm going to kiss so many tight tummies and there's nothing you Coordinating Lame Strategies On Discord Meltdownies can do about it.

WAGMI

[Anonymous No.50868252]

>>50868087
so is 20% - 75% the likelihood or is it the amount of brokerages or is it the amount of clients whos shares aren't owned by them
>I'd guess
god i thought you niggers were dumb for listening to reddit
but listening to a woman is unforgivable
i'm selling my entire 1700 share stack NON-DRS'd (Dicks Rammed up Sphincter) tax-free government savings account at 6k per share and walking with my 10 million
and there's nothing you loose tummy kissing faggots can do about it
seethe

[King Slime No.50868258]

>>50868123
Didn't ask.

[Anonymous No.50868283]

when is the nest official drs count being posted?

[Anonymous No.50868326]

>>50868252
Incredibly based to have an exit plan. $6k making $10M is very achievable.

[Anonymous No.50868330]

I know I'm a fag for waiting this long but 500 of my shares are now being sent to Computershare, how long until I get my account info I don't want them to just be out in limbo when shtf

[Anonymous No.50868339]

>>50868252
BASED! Take notes, baggies!

[Anonymous No.50868365]

>>50868330
>Had 19 months
>Chooses to be a fag
Kek

[Anonymous No.50868374]

>>50868365
I WAS BORN THIS WAY DAD

[Anonymous No.50868381]

>>50867997
>>50868002
Scripting faggot BTFO ahahahahahaha

[Anonymous No.50868396]

You all are immense fucking faggots and I hate that you will make it with me. This will be my last thread

[Anonymous No.50868405]

>>50868396
you're here forever and you're ngmi because you're definitely one of those faggots holding one share til muh 6 gorillion i can just tell

[Anonymous No.50868427]

>>50868396
See you next week

[Anonymous No.50868430]

>>50867997
Thanks for the bread baker

[Anonymous No.50868441]

Yeah im buying, meltdownies are supposed to run a tight and coherant subreddit and these weak talking points are what we are rewarded with. Fuck meltdownies. Im tired of their antics

[Anonymous No.50868448]

>>50868381
kek
tranny baker also has a 4chan pass LMAO

[Anonymous No.50868469]

>>50868203
I think she's giving a rough guesstimate on the chances of retail having been assigned counterfeit shares when held at a broker.

[Anonymous No.50868479]

>>50868405
I have 100 not him btw all you need is one but having more is great

[Anonymous No.50868485]

>>50868469
i think she's a dumb fucking woman

[Anonymous No.50868491]

I ran out of money to buy GME with.

[Anonymous No.50868494]

After the MO'ASS I'm going to start so many captive redhead breeding programs, and there's nothing you Fireless-crotch LOOSERS can do about it.

[Anonymous No.50868504]

>>50868491
Buy more anyways

[Anonymous No.50868515]

>>50868087
69% of statistics are made up on the spot.

[Anonymous No.50868519]

>>50868504
I will after work. :)

[Anonymous No.50868524]

>>50868491
One day your great*999 grandchildren will run out of GME to buy money with

[Anonymous No.50868543]

>>50868524
Impossible. They could never print enough money to equal 1 GME.

[Anonymous No.50868563]

oh janny boy, the shills, the shills are calling
from thread to thread, and down the scrollin side
the pay's gone, and all the anons sneeding
it's you, it's you must go and I must bide

[Anonymous No.50868614]

>>50868405
>he isnt aware

[Anonymous No.50868693]

>>50868396
OK bye.

[Anonymous No.50868701]

[Anonymous No.50868732]

Kek. Fucking. Baggies.

[Anonymous No.50868736]

>>50868701
What a fucking kike. Plebbit should ban him from the sub for this tweet alone.

[Anonymous No.50868739]

from the west a marge emerges from the ocean
from the north the common Fomo thaws
from east subpoena aim for their necks
from below the burried emerge to bite at their heels

and from the sky, a Goldn Cross splits the heaven.

[Anonymous No.50868749]

[Anonymous No.50868751]

Lmao deluded fucking stupid god damn bagholders

[Anonymous No.50868755]

>>50868701
>AMC
This guy is 100% a plant

[Anonymous No.50868758]

>>50868701
uh oh mincrafties

[Anonymous No.50868765]

>>50868396
>ok

[Anonymous No.50868768]

[Anonymous No.50868800]

>>50868768
Infinity squeeze

[Anonymous No.50868808]

>>50868800
checked

[Anonymous No.50868818]

Kek no squeeze baggies

[Anonymous No.50868827]

>>50868800
always has been.

[Anonymous No.50868871]

McCain was a huge corrupt retard but he got some of it right.

[Anonymous No.50868885]

My xxxx shares are split somewhat like this

44%:Fid
44%:CS
10%:TDA
2%:RH (for the lawsuit)

Now that we're getting into the "yup they're gonna definitely cheat phase" part of me wants to move more into CS but part of me wants to stay somewhat diversified just in case any goes south.

[Anonymous No.50868909]

>>50868491
Get a job

[Anonymous No.50868951]

>>50868087
Not my fucking problem plus I will be paid. And without us holding synthetics in brokerages, there is going to be no MOASS anyway. She outs herself as a dumb bitch every day.

[Anonymous No.50868990]

>>50868951
She outted herself when she implied that anyone holding to infinity was being greedy.

[Anonymous No.50869023]

>>50868524
That's a cyclical statement. The modern banking system will be replaced with the PowerUp Rewards Program, and GME will just BE money. People will trade PowerUp points for gas, food, and clothes. You will go into your local Gamestop to apply for a home loan, and they will credit you points based on your gaming history. You will pre-order Skyrim 30th anniversary edition using the points that you earned from buying your car with Loopring that you earned from getting 100% achievements unlocked on Skyrim 20th anniversary edition.

[Anonymous No.50869063]

DRS
>DRS
DRS
>DRS
DRS
>DRS
DRS
>DRS
DRS
>DRS
DRS
>DRS
DRS
>DRS
DRS
>DRS
DRS
>DRS

[Anonymous No.50869099]

>>50868768

[Anonymous No.50869107]

>>50869063
Openly admitting that you aren't 100% DRSed is the same as being against DRS, and that's a fact.

[Anonymous No.50869126]

I had a shower thought about how fun it will be to create games once NFT is fully integrated. You get to add something to your game that is so rare, and so unique, and so hard to find, there is only one in existence, and if someone finds it they are the only one to posses it. A random gamer could make national news, just like in RP1. It's fun as a gamer to think of the other fun possibilities this creates. The other of course being taking an entire subset of the young men in society who have completely given up because the bigs ruined everything, and turning their once thought useless skillset into a profitable enterprise in a new thriving economy. Some neet is going to be questing to find some rare item sponsored by some new aged investment fun kek. I get that this sounds so stupid to a non gamer, but you have to realize how many of us our out here. it's like fight club

[Anonymous No.50869156]

>>50869107
it is a desperate attempt by the shorts after realizing they cannot stop DRS, to try to slow it. Notice the guy who says he is 50/50 never just says "I chose to stay 50/50 because in my opinion it is the best way to position myself", it's always "I am a 50/50 chad, a total badass, where my other 50 50's at, cause I know there are a ton of you out there tonight!"
I have a fucking radar for this shit

[Anonymous No.50869157]

>>50869107
That's certainly what glowniggers want you to believe.

[Anonymous No.50869179]

>>50869156
I happen to be 50/50 and I have said on several occasions why. I don't plan on ever selling a share from CS and logically if broker shares were going to rug than moass is impossible.

[Anonymous No.50869184]

>>50869156
Yeah, agreed. If anyone is too spineless and lacking in conviction to DRS 100%, then it's in their best interest to keep that shameful information to themselves, assuming they're holding any GME at all.

[Anonymous No.50869186]

>>50869157
this one isn't the british indian kind. This is the train riding, bad cologne wearing, my fund just got liquidated so now I have to do this shit to stay out of prison, kind

[Anonymous No.50869215]

>>50869186
You're fucking retard. Its incredible how many boyardee acolytes there are now. I hope you're a glownigger because otherwise your too stupid to realize you fell for a psyop.

[Anonymous No.50869228]

>>50869179
what do you think happens if synthetics in brokers just get insured? there's still 100% of the float they have to buy. that's still going to be insane

[Anonymous No.50869231]

>>50869156
>I am a 50/50 chad, a total badass, where my other 50 50's at, cause I know there are a ton of you out there tonight!
Wow that's literally me.
50/50 Fidelity/CS Chads where we at?
NOT SO FAST VANGOYS

[Anonymous No.50869250]

[Anonymous No.50869256]

>>50869228
Insured what the fuck are you talking about? All shares have to be treated as real shares or we will be living in a mad max post apocalypse. If they rug the synthetics then there is no reason for anyone short to have to buy shares. The fact that glowniggers can't answer how moass can happen without them being forced to buy synthetics is a glaring tell.

[Anonymous No.50869293]

>IF YOURE NOT 100% DRSd YOURE A GAY TRANNY NOOOOOOOOOO
vs
>IF BROKERS RUG THERE WILL BE NO MOASS REEEEEEEE
Kek. The truf is in the middle.

[Anonymous No.50869300]

>>50869256
im talking about if they disappear the synthetic positions and holders get paid up to the max insurance. shorts still have to buy 100% of the float.

[Anonymous No.50869305]

>>50869215
I have a hard time feeling bad for anyone who falls for shit this close to the finish line.

>>50869293
>>IF BROKERS RUG THERE WILL BE NO MOASS REEEEEEEE
Nope, that one's true. If they don't need to buy synthetic shares to close short positions, then they don't need to buy shares to close short positions.

[Anonymous No.50869339]

>>50869250
im going to be so wealthy and theres nothing you donald ducks dick loving dork niggas can do about it

[Anonymous No.50869386]

>>50869293
That's why I'm 50/50. Makes me comfy.

[Anonymous No.50869391]

My most schizo theory yet probably 100% true
Everyone or nearly everyone most normies are privyy to a internet within a internet think of apples walled garden
Entire websites and videos just are non-existent to them on there ID tagged devices and there's some kind of mind block going on
The vaccines are just mundane very early stage nano tech that somehow blocks certain brainwaves
So when you say something about GME or GameStop investing to any group or one of these normies
All they get deep down once everything is filtered out is
HIV HIV HIV HIV FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU DEATH DEATH DEATH GORE GORE GORE GORE VIOLENCE HATE FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU DIE DIE DIE
I would be repulsed and horrified by GME too kek
Ever notice people have a violent reaction irl when anyone mentions GME ?

[Anonymous No.50869400]

>>50868396
See you tomorrow.

[Anonymous No.50869453]

No one wants to try and prove me wrong? Not even >>50869300? I'm surprised. Guess I'll say it again, in case they missed it.

>If they don't need to buy synthetic shares to close short positions, then they don't need to buy shares to close short positions

[Anonymous No.50869458]

>>50869391
Why the fuck do you mention GME irl?

[Anonymous No.50869484]

>>50869453
I hear two different stories
They won't fucking pay out the max insurance of 500K
They would simply give you ur cost basis back if brokers rug
What if they literally just say fuck the brokers every share on their is fake
They still have the close the CSGO shares

[Anonymous No.50869496]

Just finished reading the Talmud. If we don’t DRS the float by the end of Schmitta, moass is canceled.

[Anonymous No.50869512]

>>50869484
>They still have the close the CSGO shares
No, they don't. They'd just apply the same talmudic magic that got them out of their side of the obligation with the synthetics, on the real shares, since there's no functional difference between synthetics and real shares.

[Anonymous No.50869518]

>>50869453
calm down nigger. i agree that's one way it could happen. but how can you say for certain that if the synthetic positions get disappeared, there is no scenario where they still have to buy 100% of the float?

[Anonymous No.50869525]

>>50869453
Why do you spam this in every thread, you’re literally the only person who brings it up. Seems like you’re just trying to get people to sell when brokers inevitably rug. Anyways, brokers can force you to sell your shares, but someone needs to buy them. They can’t just delete the shares, they have to go to the market. Brokers may not be guilty of any crime but if they just start erasing shares from existence there is sure to be consequences. There’s no way they would take this option if it even is an option. MOASS is inevitable, idk why people don’t automatically sneed you for suggesting otherwise

[Anonymous No.50869527]

>>50869518
>They'd just apply the same talmudic magic that got them out of their side of the obligation with the synthetics, on the real shares

[Anonymous No.50869530]

>They still have to close the CSGO shares
>The Shares that you DRS'd to computer share. that are in your name and not the broker's name
>They have to be closed.

[Anonymous No.50869533]

>>50869453
>>50869453
they do need to buy them. They are just going to skip the step of you being the one to sell those shares to them, and they are going to deal directly with your broker in a dark pool deal. They will get their shares, and you will wake up with whatever price they came to in your account in the morning. This will get the moass start, but unfortunately for the shorts, they then have to go after the shares which are a little more difficult to acquire, and will take individual "negotiations". We aren't saying they are just going to "delete" the synthetics, but buy them from their owners at a price you won't agree with. Even after this, the short official short interest remains (because all those broker shares were never officially marked short anyway), but the only shares available are held but guerilla fucking traders.

[Anonymous No.50869542]

>>50869527
how do you know they would do that? they know the consequences

[Anonymous No.50869549]

>>50869542
How do I know that they would just erase their obligations if they just proved that they could erase their obligations? Are you even thinking right now?

[Anonymous No.50869558]

>>50869512
Well why haven't they fucking rugged all the shares yet ? Real/fake
Zero it out and delist this shit like rdbx already and give me my fucking 18 months back

[Anonymous No.50869563]

>>50869525
What the fuck are you talking about he's right and he's just asking for the retards/glowniggers who continue to bombard these threads with their nonsensical scenerio of moass happening without the forced buying of synthetics to explain themselves.

[Anonymous No.50869577]

>>50869542
What consequences there's seemingly none for them ?
If they just short it to zero and delisted it the SEC would pat them on the back
The real question is why haven't they fucking done it yet ?
What the fuck ????????????????????

[Anonymous No.50869581]

>>50869023
this is the way.

[Anonymous No.50869596]

>they still expect me to believe that brokers would act in such away that they would literally be ensuring their own demise
>but I cant possibly believe that there are brokers who actually want moass to happen as they would actually have alot to gain if they let moass run smoothly for their customers.

[Anonymous No.50869613]

>>50869558
Why is rdbx delisted? They don’t want us locking the float and squeezing the shorts?

[Anonymous No.50869616]

>>50869563
Did you even read my post? I just explained why he’s retarded and a shill, and yes moass can still happen without the synthetics. You clearly don’t understand the basic concept of the play. There is still the reported short interest and if we own every share and get to name our own price, then moass happens. You’re either a fucking retard or a shill and no one every brings up “moass will happen without synthetics” until you fags come in here with your “brokers can cancel MOASS at will”. If you truly believed this, you wouldn’t be here and if it were true, brokers would’ve already pulled the trigger on this shit

[Anonymous No.50869622]

>>50869533
If they cleared the overwhelming majority of their debt obligation, what makes you think they'll feel any pressure to close what remains? They're no longer being choked out on borrowing fees or holding back FTD's, and official short interest is able to ride to well over 100% because the system basically expects shorts never to close unless it's for profit.

[Anonymous No.50869634]

>>50869613
It got acquired by an online ad platform, so it's no longer traded.

[Anonymous No.50869638]

>>50869596
If the brokers rug I'm only going to be dealing in crypto Blockchain to get my gains as in stake tokenized GME on a new BlockChain and just let hedgefgts cover/close their shorts by staking 0.00000001 GME and making 1 Bitcoin per hour lel

[Anonymous No.50869653]

>>50869613
I have no fucking clue why did it like -100% in like 2 days? Is it even GME related ? Of course it probably is everything is gme related at this point

[Anonymous No.50869658]

>>50869616
Please kys faggot. If you actually followed the thread you would see the drs maxis are the ones that constantly imply that brokers will rug.

[Anonymous No.50869662]

>>50869653
It got bought out, hence the end of trading.

[Anonymous No.50869664]

>>50869549
youre being a little rude there. are they the ones erasing their obligations? or is it someone else? whoever it is, don't they have a choice between causing a catastrophe and a much bigger catastrophe? also, does any of this really matter that much? why do people defend this position so hard?

[Anonymous No.50869684]

Melvin/GME thread on /pol/. I don’t know how to link it though

[Anonymous No.50869694]

>>50869662
Why doesn't the hedge fgts and the Fed just print like quadrillions of dollars and do a hostile takeover of GameStop ?
It seems stupid to have over looked they could have just brought computershare and GameStop entirely and killed everything

[Anonymous No.50869695]

>>50869684
Triple >>>

[Anonymous No.50869697]

>>50869664
>why do people defend this position so hard?
Because moass literally can't happen without them being forced to honor synthetics as real shares. If they don't then prepare for minecraft, which admittedly im prepared for as well.

[Anonymous No.50869701]

kek baggies

[Anonymous No.50869714]

>>50869694
A hostile takeover requires getting enough shares off of share holders.

[Anonymous No.50869717]

>>50869697
why does it matter if some people believe brokers will get rugged or synthetics get disappeared? what will they do because of that which negatively impacts us or themselves?

[Anonymous No.50869738]

>>50869658
kek brokers won't have to rug to sell their shares they were letting you borrow back to the shorts in a giant deal in dark pools in AH. you will get either your cost basis back, or they may try to pacify and give something like 300 per share. I personally am not 100 percent DRSed, mostly because I buy during the day from my broker while watching the chart. I also hold a lot of options. that being said, the vast majority of my investment is in my own name and I would feel incredibly nervous if I weren't positioned this way

[Anonymous No.50869741]

>>50869714
Heh heh hahahaha good fucking luck after 18 months of fucking hardcore training and shit apes DRSing good fucking luck with that lol

[Anonymous No.50869753]

I JUST WANNA MAKE IT

[Anonymous No.50869756]

>>50869741
Pretty much why it's off the table anyway.

[Anonymous No.50869757]

GAYSEX BROS WE'RE MOONING OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[Anonymous No.50869771]

>>50869664
>also, does any of this really matter that much? why do people defend this position so hard?
Look at that, with their backs up against the wall, the best they can come up with is 'why do you even care this doesn't matter'. Pathetic.

[Anonymous No.50869774]

>>50869658
People say that brokers will rug all the time. That’s not what you claimed they you were replying to. You’re supposedly replying to the notion that synthetics are not necessary for MOASS. You’re moving the goalposts to make it seem like you somehow won the argument, but you and your friend just got assblasted by my superior logic. MOASS is inevitable. Sneed

[Anonymous No.50869785]

>>50869577
There is clearly more going on than just our well researched speculations.

[Anonymous No.50869788]

>>50869774
I literally said moass cannot happen without synthetics. Are you having a stroke?

[Anonymous No.50869794]

>>50869664
>why do people defend this position so hard?
Because they want you to sell when brokers rug. They’re shills anon

[Anonymous No.50869795]

Does anyone have any real evidence of what a broker does during a real short squeeze like top ships or Volkswagen squeeze? Do they actually let people sell for ridiculous amounts? And actually have that amount settle and let you cash out ?

[Anonymous No.50869801]

>>50869788
That was my point too, so I don't know what the fuck he thinks he read.

[Anonymous No.50869805]

>>50869684
>>>/pol/390744969

[Anonymous No.50869810]

>>50869771
why are you acting like this? youre treating me like im a shill. for what? seriously, why do people attack anyone for asking about this?
>>50869794
is playlist anon a shill?

[Anonymous No.50869814]

It's tomorrow.

[Anonymous No.50869827]

>>50869805
Isn't this news like 7 months old ? Melvin or plotkin or whatever bankrupt or some shit some hedge fund collapsed shorting gme

[Anonymous No.50869838]

>>50869788
Why do you spam “if brokers rug MOASS is cancelled every thread?
>because people keep saying synthetics aren’t needed for MOASS
No one says that
>people say brokers will rug all the time
Anon, you just changed the subject
>no i didn’t. I literally said MOASS can’t happen without synthetics
Anon, I…

[Anonymous No.50869842]

>>50869810
>youre treating me like im a shill. for what?
>>50869228 and >>50869300 mostly, but the rest of your replies didn't help.

[Anonymous No.50869845]

>>50869827
The SEC investigating them is new.

[Anonymous No.50869852]

>>50869810
>is playlist anon a shill?
Yes

[Anonymous No.50869853]

>>50869838
If the brokers heh most of them don't actually rug and everything goes smoothly throughout lol
I'm going to some a very nice rugs and plaster the brokers logo on each of them
It's a really nice rug

[Anonymous No.50869857]

>>50869838
Anon, take a moment to follow the course of the thread. >>50869293 inspired my comment. I didn't even bring it up.

[Anonymous No.50869881]

>>50869838
You need to reread the thread. Or just try in the next one.

[Anonymous No.50869887]

>>50869842
ok im going to bed. apparently asking about this makes you a shill.

[Anonymous No.50869904]

This puts it so eloquently and succinctly
It's so fucking simple
Simpl as

[Anonymous No.50869910]

>>50869857
>>50869881
If you think brokers rugging cancels MOASS then why are you invested in GME? If they can cancel MOASS, obviously they’ll do it, so why hold?

[Anonymous No.50869915]

>>50869814
I just started working out again and I can see RC is in pretty good shape as we are the same age, but his arms are thicker and he has no gut. Dude really has his shit together

[Anonymous No.50869924]

>>50869910
Why haven't they done it yet tho ? It's been 18 months why didn't they rug it all back in jan 2021??????????????????
Was Gary gensler too busy wanting to suck every one's dick in every GME general ?

[Anonymous No.50869930]

>>50869924
That’s a good fucking question anon, I bet they don’t have an answer for you

[Anonymous No.50869931]

>>50869910
>If they can cancel MOASS, obviously they’ll do it, so why hold?
You said it yourself right there. If there was any possible way that they could do it, then OBVIOUSLY THEY WOULD DO IT. The fact that they haven't is proof that they can't. Their greatest foible in this whole saga was the often quoted 'trading is a hard game'. That's what we'd hear if this was really done, because that's what they said in February 2021 when they thought this was really done.

[Anonymous No.50869943]

8 AM
Today
LETS FUCKING
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[Anonymous No.50869946]

>>50869805
>can't talk about politics on /biz/ or you'll get banned
>make a political discussion about finance on /pol/
>thread almost always gets deleted depending if the jannies are awake
You can't fucking win.

[Anonymous No.50869950]

>>50869910
Your mother dropped you when you were a child. I never said I believed brokers were rugging. If I'm invested in gme it's because I believe that it will be worth more at some point. You continue to imply that because I'm capable of using logic that I believe the thing I am arguing against. How old are you?

[Anonymous No.50869952]

>>50869931
So basically what you’re saying is that brokers can’t rug?

[Anonymous No.50869963]

>>50869910
Just because a person is aware of a possibility doesn't mean they necessarily think it will happen.

>China could nuke the US any day now, better just kill myself now and avoid the trouble

Retard

[Anonymous No.50869966]

>>50869950
Nigga do you listen to yourself talk? You keep flipflopping between talking about whether or not brokers will rug and whether or not brokers rugging cancels MOASS. These are two different subjects

[Anonymous No.50869967]

>>50869952
Yes. Brokers rugging would be the nuclear option that shows they're not willing to even pretend this is a free market anymore, hence if brokers rug there can be no MOASS.

[Anonymous No.50869982]

>50869966
It's like I'm arguing with a homeless meth addict.

[Anonymous No.50870006]

>>50869904
It’s just me talking out of my ass stringing buzzwords together because I’m excited about the thread. Only reason it sounds coherent is because I’m Jewish and I can just blurt out financial jargon without paying attention and sound like I know what I’m talking about. I have no idea what’s actually going on

[Anonymous No.50870021]

>>50869982
Lol that's why these GME threads are so much fun
Kek trillionaire meth crackheads
ITS RUGGING BROKERS ARE RUNNING NO WAIT IF BROKERS RUG NO MOASS BUT IF NO MOASS THEY STILL HAVE TO CLOSE THE CS SHARES RSBLLG EVASBR REDRABBE RRABLEE F INJA NIGGERTURGLES SJAJJAREES SSGVIE DAADD JAMES BON DNINTENDO64 HOHOHOHOHOH HET GRUBBED UBEREATS FUCK CRESMPIES ILLL SUCK EVERYONES DICK IN THIS THRED EOD 40 TTOLLIOKS DOLLARS

[Anonymous No.50870033]

https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/11892

Turns out they can halt us anytime they want if price starts showing too high or low in the order book. This has been what they have used to halt us when they see orders of like 200k, It literally says

"Each additional factor shall be considered with a view toward maintaining a fair and orderly market and the protection of investors and the public interest."

They will literally rob you and tell you to your face it was for your own protection

[Anonymous No.50870034]

>>50870021
Bud. Have a beer, take your meds or something.
Being this high strung isn't good for the heart, it's a quick way to an early grave

[Anonymous No.50870042]

stop saying rug. The will sell their stock, which was your "position", as stated in all of their TOS. It is their stock. not yours. They can sell it to help the shorts out just like Porsche gave VW "a good deal" during that squeeze. stop saying rug like the brokers vanish with the shares. That is disingenuous. When the squeeze starts, brokers who have lots of shares on their books to sell big lots to the shorts. this will be the start of the short squeeze, not the end of it.

[Anonymous No.50870052]

>>50870033
the second halt monday was very strange

[Anonymous No.50870054]

>>50870033
Good thing we’re moving off exchange

[Anonymous No.50870060]

>>50870042
Can you tell me why they would do that?

[Anonymous No.50870061]

>>50870054
then there is no short squeeze, but there would be true price discovery which would make us all wealthy if the company pulls off the turnaround

[Anonymous No.50870064]

>>50870021
It’s way more complicated than that. There’s an infinity pool in play and other factors. We’re playing 4D chess right along with RC because unlike AMC Apes we actually care about the long term future of our investment

[Anonymous No.50870078]

>>50869967
The MOASS is jamming up all sorts of political options for the usurper's government. Any of their insane Communist policies that would crash the stock market are now off the table, because that would torch hedgie collateral and then we win. They rely on the fiction of a free market even moreso now that people are questioning the legitimacy of elections. If they rugged the brokers now you'd have a revolution.

[Anonymous No.50870083]

>>50870042
Sigh I hope they get a good deal on it will the money actually end up in holders brokerage accounts ?
Wake up to several Millon dollars whoops the street shares are all sold to close the shorts the money ends up in the account at least right ?

[Anonymous No.50870086]

>>50870060
More importantly, could he tell you why they've waited this long to do it, if they've been able to do it this the whole time? Seems like Melvin Capital wouldn't have had to be sacrificed if it was as easy to arrange as he says.

[Anonymous No.50870090]

>>50870060
literally zero people on wallstreet want the "apes" to break "their markets". It will be determined that the only way to diffuse this will be for the brokers to sell the shorts retail positions. maybe some kind of instruction by dtcc? It allows them to obfuscate the true short interest forever, even after the resulting DRS squeeze. no one will ever know exactly how many shares global retail ever held because they were too stupid and manipulable to think to flip over their own fucking cards and count them together

[Anonymous No.50870100]

>>50870061
There would be something because the total number of shares will exceed the float. We bought those shares in good faith. So there will be a recall and forced to close

[Anonymous No.50870111]

>>50870083
the price negotiated will not be to your satisfaction (if you even saw anything other than cost basis), especially with what happens immediatly after. Lets just say they will have to price out fomo quickly, even from those who just got their Fidelitygmebucks at 300 per share or worse

[Anonymous No.50870122]

The incoming crypto baggie mass suicide is going to be just as amazing as the MOASS itself

[Anonymous No.50870123]

>>50870100
I mean I guess what you are saying is leaving the dtcc, the company would bring all the synthetics with them? that would be diluting themselves on the new market. most likely all the shares get registered and then THOSE shares get removed leaving chaos behind. just like with the splivie its a game of musical chairs, and it only matters if the music stops

[Anonymous No.50870126]

>>50870052
This explains how they can halt it anytime they want.

And if you want to be really mad all the brokers and banks can say "We dont lead your shares"

"make available for loan all or some of the shares of any stock that
member actually has available in its DTC account. Id. Only shares that are: ( i ) actually
on deposit at DTC; and (ii) are otherwise uaencumbered"

[Anonymous No.50870133]

>>50870122
Right now they are so full of hope thinking the bull run might be back on

[Anonymous No.50870135]

>>50870111
Ok so basically the brokers rug is just the the rolling of the green carpet for the real moass to begin welp better luck next time broker only chads

[Anonymous No.50870159]

>>50870090
>>50870111
Ok so why didn't the DTCC instigate this between brokers and SHF 2 weeks ago instead of what they actually did 2 weeks ago, which was defraud Gamestop and all it's investors on the world stage? Seems to me it would make a lot more sense to run through whatever process you're talking about, and not have to worry about the splivvy distribution or the potential ramifications of improperly handling Gamestop's corporate action in the first place.

[Anonymous No.50870164]

>>50870123
I imagine gamestop would go "well we issued xyz shares and that many are in our transfer agent so we're taking them out of the dtcc" or something like that. Everyone else is owed a share that someone else borrowed so the dtcc would have to settle all of those. Im not sure exactly how itll pan out but itll be a shitshow.

[Anonymous No.50870169]

>>50870159
because he's talking out of his ass and that's not going to happen ever

[Anonymous No.50870181]

>>50870169
You said it, not me.

[Anonymous No.50870190]

>>50870159
because it would have started a short squeeze. Did what they did start a short squeeze yet?
I think you fail to realize how small the percentage of the population which understands this is. They are still winning the propaganda and psy war. there wasn't a single msm mention of the DTCC pencil whipping that form, but if every gme holder in fidelity or vanguard or all of them wakes up to cash and no shares, THAT is making the news...

[Anonymous No.50870198]

[Anonymous No.50870199]

>>50870164
the dtcc would say we no longer have any obligations to this ticker because it no longer exists. That is your broker rugging scenario. The shares just go poof

[Anonymous No.50870203]

Holy fucking kek 1 am baggies

[Anonymous No.50870205]

>>50869622
Do you not see how dry the volume has been? If they clear any obligation at all it will send the price into the stratosphere way beyond. They will no longer be in control and will be forced to liquidate at any price.

[Anonymous No.50870213]

>>50870190
Umm well I'm taking that cash all of it... And doing a direct buy on CSGO
A few moments later
Thanks for all the fish

[Anonymous No.50870215]

>>50870198
>sell now, ask questions later
thanks anthony

[Anonymous No.50870221]

kek east coasties

[Anonymous No.50870234]

>>50870190
It would have stopped a short squeeze, you mean. By letting the splivvy go out as it was, even improperly handled, they let a huge portion of shares go to people dangerously devoted to DRS, which in your scenario are THE ONLY SHARES AT ACTUAL RISK OF MOASS. It would make absolutely no sense for them to hand out freebies for people to DRS if they planned to put a cap on the shares that weren't DRS'ed and then negotiate with DRS holder's afterward. If I could think this far ahead, they definitely would have. Your premise is fundamentally flawed.

[Anonymous No.50870235]

>>50870126
Has anyone asked "we dont lent your shares" Fidelity support if the DTCC can loan out your shares that you hold with them?

[Anonymous No.50870251]

>>50870198
He acts like the stock hasn't popped off multiple times as if they keep shuffling stuff under the rug instead of resolving the core issue (closing out all the shorts)

[Anonymous No.50870279]

>>50870251
He gave precisely zero concrete evidence of his arguments just appealing to emotions classic shill move
Or he is just really out of touch with the stock for the last 16 months or so

DTCC commuting international securities fraud is insane there is nothing that can be disproven this fact only solidifies the DD even more so than ever

[Anonymous No.50870291]

>>50869300
According to my bank's TOS, my shit is only insured up to a value of $25k

[Anonymous No.50870299]

>>50870234
it bought them another day didn't it? You see a big article on msm yet causing fomo? DRS numbers aren't until sept, and won't even include the tsunami of shares to CS they just caused. It bought them time. None of this is actually fixable...just kickable

[Anonymous No.50870313]

TSLA split august 24th ? 3:1
Good distraction hedgies

[Anonymous No.50870317]

>>50869300
Let’s say the total shares circulating right now is over 4 billion, for the sake of this thought experiment assume every broker rugs. Now assume that there can’t be more shares drsed than actually exist. Then there would be no moass cause now the total shares is <= drs amount. I’m sure some brokers will get funky but we will still see some extra dumb stupid extra high insane prices. For those who struggle with basic reasoning this isn’t against drs just pointing out the obvious.

[Anonymous No.50870327]

>>50870251
Or like if robinhood didn’t turn off the buy or how all the brokers ignored the split dividend and issued a forward split. There’s no arguing with retards like him. No one in my family wanted to buy bitcoin when it was $1,000 and called it gambling but now it’s in everyone’s portfolio like they always knew about it or something.

[Anonymous No.50870336]

>>50870317
what do you mean rugs? they sell all those shares back to the shorts starting the squeeze (for gentlemanly amounts), and then the market opens, the public finds out what the fuck is happening, and GME shares are literal unobtainable. demand meet....vacuum

[Anonymous No.50870338]

>>50870299
>it bought them another day didn't it?
I never said it didn't. I said that if the plan you proposed in your first post >>50870042 was the plan all along, the DTCC's current actions run completely counter to that plan, and make no sense in conjunction with it.

[Anonymous No.50870340]

>>50870317
U are a fucking shill
Those shares don't just disappear
The shares will be gone but the cash value will still appear in every brokerages accounts
You know what happens next ? A massive dash of direct buys on CS float is locked in 1 day

[Anonymous No.50870343]

>>50870327
and even then it took some paid celeb tweet or commercial for them to accept it.

[Anonymous No.50870360]

>>50870338
because they don't intend to let a short squeeze happen. Game theory dictates they wouldn't still be doing all this nonsense if they didn't think they could still get away with it all. It has never been a sure thing when you are dealing with crooks of this level. But certain little things didn't go to plan, and now they are very much reactionary instead of proactive like they were in the days of creating the AMC distraction or convincing you all to hide your positions from eachother

[Anonymous No.50870381]

in the game of musical chairs, if the music never stops, it doesn't matter how few chairs their are...if any.

[Anonymous No.50870406]

That's a whole lot of posts, too bad I'm not readin' em.

[Anonymous No.50870407]

>>50870360
>because they don't intend to let a short squeeze happen. Game theory dictates they wouldn't still be doing all this nonsense if they didn't think they could still get away with it all.
Why would they waste their time playing any of these games if they had a killswitch this whole time? It makes no sense to the way they're actually acting. You can't reconcile your super secret back-up plan that saves the shorts with actions that actively hamper the execution of that super secret back-up plan, like handing out a bunch of shares for people to DRS instead of selling off their shares before the record date would have entitled them to a divvy in the first place.

[Anonymous No.50870422]

>>50870407
Okay bbby is starting to look pretty compelling for gme moass
https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/wm8gwf/ryans_warning_the_countdown_to_moass_has_begun/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf

[Anonymous No.50870429]

>>50868050
I already bought in at $22. Thanks Ryan

[Anonymous No.50870438]

>>50870111
This sounds like you came up with the conclusion first and struggled like a motherfucker to work out how it would happen.

[Anonymous No.50870466]

>>50870199
It would have to be priced under 1 dollar for 30 days before being qualified for delisting.

[Anonymous No.50870475]

>>50870466
NIGGER if it was priced under a 1$ for 30 days I am selling my car to DRS the rest of the mother fucking float in a week

[Anonymous No.50870484]

Holy fuck the shilling is insane right now. They want people in brokers to be so worried about getting “rugged” in some fashion that they pussy out and sell for peanuts. IF, HYPOTHETICALLY all broker shares disappeared or make up whatever you want they gave you cash, the total shares circulating at that point would be in line with the amount issued by GME, aka no squeeze. When a share is shorted the number circulating almost always increases by 1 because the person loaning their share can still access theirs to sell if they want. (Big individual lenders can’t always sell after they’ve loaned shares). Drs is still very important, but there can never be more gme drsed than exists so those extras in brokers mean the amount circulating is higher than issued by GameStop. So a share is a share is a share hedge ledgie has to go into the market and buy any shares until the total is = to the amount issues roughly speaking. Moass tomorrow, the shilling has reached a point of causing as much confusion and drama and false intensity, this is actually a net positive it means they know they are fucked.

[Anonymous No.50870491]

>>50870360
“Game theory“ suggests one more day is better than no more days. It doesn’t suggest that there is a clear win outcome. Where does commuting international securities fraud in front of the entire world fit into your ideas on game theory? “Game theory suggests” stfu retard

[Anonymous No.50870507]

I'm still keeping most of my shit in tax-free broker accounts. These shares are fully paid and I fully expect to be able to sell one for 7 digits during moass. Then I'll reinvest into dividend etfs for a fat tax-free income for life. DRS if you want, but we will all wagmi.

[Anonymous No.50870513]

>>50870466
this was a response to "ryan pull us out of the DTCC because of their fuckery"

[Anonymous No.50870516]

>>50870484
>>50870507
WAGMI, here's a nice meme, sorry for being a cantankerous dick tonight.

[Anonymous No.50870519]

>>50870484
take a breath bud. You did DRS a percentage of your stack....right anon? RIGHT ANON!?

[Anonymous No.50870531]

>>50870407
I mean you wouldn't start out using a nuke. You would save it as a last resort right? Whose to say, maybe only a handful of brokers "rug" while others don't. We don't know wtf will happen. We do know that DRS seems important bas d on GameStop's ticker they've added to the quarterly reports. Now the DTCC hoards the divvy shares? Both together should make you confident in at least going 80% DRS.

[Anonymous No.50870534]

>>50870491
you mean like turning off the buy side only of multiple brokers? That kind of securities fraud. We are almost two years later and the SEC is just starting to look at ONE of the brokers who commited that international securities fraud. Also headsup anon you say that so much you are pretty easy to spot. I will call you "international securities fraud anon"

[Anonymous No.50870537]

>>50869250
So the squeeze happened at 16 bucks? Told ya baggies it was over a long time ago.

[Anonymous No.50870545]

>>50869533
The result would be millions of people cheated out of life changing money. They would be pretty mad I'd imagine, surviving another day would be literal

[Anonymous No.50870554]

>>50868203
So there's an up to 75% chance that you'll end up a bagholder if you don't DRS?
I don't like those odds

[Anonymous No.50870559]

>>50870513
So you're just saying whatever you could imagine would happen based on nothing

[Anonymous No.50870564]

>>50870507
What are some good dividend yielding ETFs?
Qyld ?

[Anonymous No.50870569]

>>50870545
just like 08. They will breadcrumb them with the hopes of giant lawsuits where lawyers will get rich and they get pennies. And all they will wish was that they had been disciplined enough to register at least some of their investment in their own name

[Anonymous No.50870571]

>>50868108
I love to see Ryan gosling smile

[Anonymous No.50870584]

>>50870531
>I mean you wouldn't start out using a nuke. You would save it as a last resort right?
Again, all of this speculation flies in the face of what they're actually doing, which is making their opponent stronger instead of ending the fight when they (supposedly) have the ability to end it. It just doesn't make sense, not even in a kind of 'how could they even dare' sort of way. It just plain doesn't make sense.

[Anonymous No.50870586]

Seriously though, what the fuck are people waiting for? The DRS campaign has been running for exactly a year now and while 50% of the free float sounds fine, it's really fucking nothing if we are assuming a billion synthetics or so. Either the theory is wrong or people are fucking slow idiots. This should have been over 9 months ago.

[Anonymous No.50870609]

>>50870569
How could you literally not have at least mother fucking 1 booked shared DRS from a rugkerage of your choice
Why open yourself to the possibility of being FUCKed ?
FUDelity chatbot vr assistance website
Type rep
Type drs 1 share GME
Legal bullshit
Type yes
Wait for confirmation #
Close the fucking browser window
2 seconds nigger

[Anonymous No.50870611]

>>50870586
People are slow idiots. We've DRSed at least 5% of the float since the splivvy already.

[Anonymous No.50870620]

>>50870586
>>50870611
If AMC wasn't such a potent distraction
Gme would have moass summer 2021

[Anonymous No.50870633]

They should be forced to close short positions when a company is getting nearer bankruptcy. If it's an actual garbage company it should be easy to close if no fraud committed. If it's a good company being fucked with it will be difficult.

[Anonymous No.50870642]

>>50870586
>Either the theory is wrong or people are fucking slow idiots.
Have you not been here for the discussions about how the DRS rate compares to what you can expect from forum engagement rules? 90% of people lurk (don't DRS), 10% of people make comments (DRS) and 10% of the people who make comments will make content (DRS multiple times). If 50% of the free float was locked up successfully by 10% of 10% of every GME holder, the implications are staggering, and frankly, I think it's being generous to suggest even 10% of holders have DRS'ed.

[Anonymous No.50870653]

>>50870642
The ones that DRSed will be god 11D time lords

[Anonymous No.50870663]

>>50870235
You would have to word it like "Does Fidelity loan any of its own account holdings/securities with the DTC?"

[Anonymous No.50870666]

if i have 200 shares drs’d am i gonna wagmi?

[Anonymous No.50870675]

>>50870663
Ends chat
Click
Is the response you'll get kek

[Anonymous No.50870680]

>>50870666
Yes satan 100%
Moass is also tomorrow dark lord

[Anonymous No.50870714]

>>50870666
Yeah, it's the people who hold shares in a brokerage that's going to end up bagholding.
Since the brokers are on the hook for the shares (IBKR said this themselves), they have to use the brokers money to buy back the shares. So if you sell a share on a brokerage, the money the broker recieves will immidiatly be used to pay for more shares, meaning you get nothing
>but muh FDIC
If you honestly believe this exist then you have not been paying attention

[Anonymous No.50870727]

>>50870666
Depends on how diamond your hands are.

[Anonymous No.50870731]

>god 11D time lords
It's bad enough saying something so phenominally insulting, but then you post the most shit eating grin next to it.

You are far and above the worst person in this thread.

[Anonymous No.50870735]

>>50870235
>can DTCC loan out your shares
Yes.
They can and they do, through their Lending Programmes.
... Have you guys not being paying attention? DTCC is the real problem

[Anonymous No.50870764]

>>50870554
20%-75% is an absolutely meanless set of numbers.
It's basically just an admission of
>I want to sound smart and knowledgeable so ima just pull some numbers out of my ass

[Anonymous No.50870786]

>>50870735
I didn't ask if anybody knew it or for a confirmation. I want to know if anybody asked the Fidelity about it. Seeing as they're always so quick to say we don't lend out your shares, it seems pretty disingenuous if they know the dtcc is lending them out instead. Functionally it's the same thing. I was just curious if we heard it directly from Fidelity rather than reading documents and whatnot.

[Anonymous No.50870798]

>>50870786
Ah, I see. Fair point anon.
You could ask them, I guess?

[Anonymous No.50870825]

>>50870714
Why would your broker be on the hook for shares if they aren't massively short GME themselves? Are you implying that brokers will suddenly realize "oh shit all our shares are fake" and be forced to buy?
It if gets to the point where brokers can tell the difference between real and fake shares outside of 100% DRS then we're fucked.

[Anonymous No.50870833]

>>50870534
First time I’ve ever said it. You once again prove you’re not as smart as you think you are

[Anonymous No.50870839]

>>50870825
He's misconstruing IBKR's obligation to fill customers naked calls (which was what fucked them) with them not purchasing the securities in the first place.

[Anonymous No.50870858]

>>50870798
Honestly I was thinking of mentioning that I don't want the dtcc lending my shares when Fidelity tells me that "we're not letting them out" when I want to DRS them

[Anonymous No.50870867]

Ken Griffin, you have 1 yil
>>50867997
>7997 checked

[Anonymous No.50870879]

>>50870825
Because of the default waterfall. While the DTCC is responsible for delivery, they changed their rules so they can now take money from all ther participants (that is, your broker) to pay up.
Essentially, the DTCC can forcefully margin call and liquidate the entire securities industry, which I find hilarious

[Anonymous No.50870881]

Here at FUDelity ahem I mean Fidelity
We never lent out your shares neither does the DTCC. Your shares are safe and real
Take our word for it GOYIm ahem I mean valued investor

[Anonymous No.50870903]

Moass is tomorrow

[Anonymous No.50870941]

What’s up with retards that post the same stupid shit every single thread? Is it just autism or bots? I’d rather see Reddit spacing than failed .

[Anonymous No.50870959]

>>50870903
*today

[Anonymous No.50871030]

>>50870881
>Hakke Hyaku Nijūhasshō

[Anonymous No.50871050]

>>50870879
Computershare is a DTCC participant.

[Anonymous No.50871057]

>>50869757
I gave up all sex in my life when I (drunkenly) thought that trusting the son of ubisoft's ceo with his champ project would be a good idea

[Anonymous No.50871129]

>>50871057
Why is everyone so shilly tonight? If there are bored holders shilling, can you say that you are so I don’t keep thinking this is some sort of paid attempt by shf?

[Anonymous No.50871138]

>>50871050
ComputerShare is literally just a list of people who own stocks. If the DTCC went tits up, CS would just go "whatever". They still have the record of all their stockholders. CS isn't a broker, THEY ARE THE ONES WHO DECIDES WHAT SHARES ARE REAL

[Anonymous No.50871151]

>>50871138
But if the dtcc liquidates CS, how are you going to be able to sell if CS doesn't exist anymore?

[Anonymous No.50871161]

Ah yes, the age old broker vs cs argument. Love to see it

[Anonymous No.50871170]

>>50871138
You are arguing that brokers would do something highly illegal due to their obligations as DTC participants but saying that CS wouldn't do something illegal in their role as a DTC participant despite them also being bound by the same rules change that'd unfairly force them to be collateral?

[Anonymous No.50871188]

>>50871151
CS doesn't own any assets (unless you include office chairs and tables).
In the case the NYSE goes tits up, you would just wait for a new stock market to emerge. Perhaps GME would even start trading their shares on their own defi exchange

[Anonymous No.50871204]

>>50871188
https://www.computershare.com/News/2021_CPU_Annual_Report.pdf
They have like 5 billion in assets.

[Anonymous No.50871218]

KEK BAGGIES!

[Anonymous No.50871226]

>>50870620

If there wasnt amc you'd be blaming something else.
It is always like this with faggots like you.

[Anonymous No.50871251]

DRs fomo starts to nag me... should I buy a giveashare? have to wait for my next payday.
help me frens, give input

[Anonymous No.50871261]

>>50871226
Do you actually hold amc? Why do you think that’s a good idea

[Anonymous No.50871267]

If you can't see by now that posters like >50871188 have barely got a clue what they're talking about, I don't know how much clearer they can make it for you.

[Anonymous No.50871277]

>>50871267
You’re no authority

[Anonymous No.50871282]

>>50871170
Okay, let me explain it:
What is a share?
It is part ownership of a company.
If a company has 100 chairs and 100 shares, you could liquidate the company and each shareholder would recieve 1 chair each.

CS, the transfer agent, keeps track of who own each stock. Meaning, if GreenPepe owns 40 shares, RedPepe owns 30 shares and BluePepe owns 30 shares, all the company's shares will be accounted for.
CS literally keeps a list of Green-, Red- and BluePepes shares. The shares belong to the Pepes, not CS.

Now, the DTCC buys 10 shares from GreenPepe. The DTCC has 10 shares on CS' book, the rest of the Pepes have 30 shares each. Math checks out.

The DTCC sells naked short 100 shares to brokers, even though only 10 exist. CS still records the DTCC only holding 10 shares. Which means, the DTCC only has 10 fucking shares on The List.

The brokers buy shares from the DTCC, thinking they have 'real' shares.

When a squeeze happens, the DTCC can (AND WILL) liquidate brokers who happen to hold more shares than actually exist, since it's actually the DTCC who owns the shares the brokers "hold".

ComputerShare CANNOT liquidate the shares on it's list, since the shares does not belong to them and it CERTAINLY does not belong to the DTCC.

[Anonymous No.50871284]

>>50871188
Lol ok

[Anonymous No.50871289]

>>50871277
I'm leagues ahead of the guy who said CS doesn't own any assets, and I'm sure you are too.

[Anonymous No.50871307]

>>50871282
And the DTCC is just going to ignore and not liquidate CS despite it being in their ability to do so in your scenario?

[Anonymous No.50871308]

>>50871282
In your scenario, what's stopping the DTCC from margin calling CS?
How are you going to sell your shares if CS is either broke or stops existing as a company? Sure. Your shares will still be in your name but how are you gunna do anything with em?

[Anonymous No.50871342]

>>50871308
>In your scenario, what's stopping the DTCC from margin calling CS?
The fact that CS isn't a broker and doesn't have any margin positions, you fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.50871353]

What are the make it stacks for GME and BBBY respectively?

[Anonymous No.50871361]

>>50871204
>>50871307
>>50871308
>why can't the DTCC just liquidate CS
The same fucking reason your landlord can't sell your car when he defaults on his mortgage.
Because IT'S NOT HIS FUCKING CAR

[Anonymous No.50871367]

>>50871342
>The fact that CS isn't a broker and doesn't have any margin positions, you fucking retard.
It's in reference to thisBecause of the default waterfall. While the DTCC is responsible for delivery, they changed their rules so they can now take money from all ther participants (that is, your broker) to pay up.
>Essentially, the DTCC can forcefully margin call and liquidate the entire securities industry, which I find hilarious
from >>50870879

[Anonymous No.50871380]

>>50871361
But as you said
>Because of the default waterfall. While the DTCC is responsible for delivery, they changed their rules so they can now take money from all ther participants (that is, your broker) to pay up.
Essentially, the DTCC can forcefully margin call and liquidate the entire securities industry, which I find hilarious
And CS is a DTC participant, if that's the interpretation of the rule change why would CS be exempt.

[Anonymous No.50871387]

>>50871342
It's a DTCC participant. According to buddy

>Because of the default waterfall. While the DTCC is responsible for delivery, they changed their rules so they can now take money from all ther participants (that is, your broker) to pay up. Essentially, the DTCC can forcefully margin call and liquidate the entire securities industry, which I find hilarious

This was in response to me asking how brokers that don't have a short position on GME will get liquidated.

So either the DTCC has the ability to liquidate any participant, at will. Or, they can only liquidate participants who are short GME. You can't have it both ways.
Fucknut

[Anonymous No.50871396]

>>50871367
>>50871380
Ugh, awful formatting.

[Anonymous No.50871399]

>>50871367
>>50871387
You do realize that nuking the transfer agent of a stock to close out short positions of a heavily direct registered stock is complete nonsense, right? It would make it literally, totally, permanently impossible for them to close.

[Anonymous No.50871409]

>>50871399
Stock gets delisted if it endures an extended period with no trading. See Evergrande.

[Anonymous No.50871414]

>>50871396
>>50871399
You are both stupid sneedy shills and are stinky and have doodoo heads

[Anonymous No.50871442]

>>50871414
Credit where it's due that's a better argument. But I don't think lying to people to get higher DRS numbers is a morally or logically correct thing to do.

[Anonymous No.50871445]

hi

[Anonymous No.50871453]

>>50871399
If they nuke everything, why would they need to close? If they can liquidate every participant, CS included, what's stopping them? If they are going to lose everything anyways, why not just fuck the market up to the extent that everything shuts down and start from scratch?

Sounds ridiculous doesn't it? Almost as ridiculous and the DTCC randomly liquidating brokers but leaves CS untouched.

If financial Armageddon hits the point where the dtcc is liquidating members, the entire system will burn down and your shares being in CS won't save you.

I sure as fuck hope it doesn't get to that point, but acting like CS is the only safe bet is fucking retarded.

[Anonymous No.50871472]

>>50871380
>>50871387
My mistake - when I said "securities industry", I meant "the securities system lead by the DTCC", which is practically the overwhelming, vast majority of modern banking system.

[Anonymous No.50871487]

Stroganoff for lunch today

[Anonymous No.50871505]

>>50871487
I was Stroganoff on hedgies wives faces last night.

[Anonymous No.50871507]

>>50871453
>If financial Armageddon hits the point where the dtcc is liquidating members, the entire system will burn down and your shares being in CS won't save you.
Yes it will. You retain ownership of your shares. Once the Armageddon is over, you can sell your shares, if you wish. You could even sell them outside the DTCC/NYSE, although that's already possible through the STAMP program.

[Anonymous No.50871512]

peepo popo

[Anonymous No.50871516]

>>50871380
Think of Computershare like a bank deposit box for your stocks. The bank(computershare) holds it for you at a secured location, but the stocks are yours. Its not like holding cash with banks loan out, its like having your grandmothers silver and birth certificates in a deposit box. No amount of liquidation of computershare lets them touch those, unless they want to actually commit suicide by 3 shots to the back of the head by literally every citizen. Cause thats what would happen if every bank stole your deposit box.

[Anonymous No.50871521]

>>50871512
based

[Anonymous No.50871530]

>>50871353
gme
>literally 1
bbby
>1000

[Anonymous No.50871549]

>>50871516
this is good explanation. makes me feel safe.

[Anonymous No.50871552]

>>50871516
Right and that explains how you're going to sell from an insolvent company if the DTC decides to nuke CS with every broker in this hypothetical scenario.

[Anonymous No.50871557]

>>50871552
GameStop can appoint a new transfer agent if CS goes under.

[Anonymous No.50871561]

>>50871505
Yep, there it is

I remember when some dude sent deer stroganoff to Melvin with return address to Gamestore HQ

[Anonymous No.50871569]

>>50870642
I haven't DRS'd all my shares. I don't have that many to DRS, as the total is only in the double digits. I hope my meager contribution goes towards costing greedy hedgefunds billions. Even if the squeeze ends up being a paltry payout, hearing that Citadel, Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse, and similar shitheels will lose their shirts would be great. Boomer retirement accounts getting blown out will be funny as well.

[Anonymous No.50871577]

>>50871442
Neither is sand bagging the process by bragging about how much “smarter “ or “clever” you are for only partially drsing. Drs is no different from a broker, except that it Fucks over the dtcc and moves this whole thing along

[Anonymous No.50871601]

>>50871507
I'm not convinced that would be an option if CS get liquidated though. And even if it is, if all brokers get liquidated anyways, I don't think it would matter. By the time the whole mess got sorted out, any potential chance moass would be long gone.

>>50871516
What happens if someone sets off a large bomb inside said bank? All the employees(brokers) get blown up. The bank manager(CS) get his knees blown off and bleeds to death. All the computers in the place are destroyed. Your assets are still in the lock box in theory, but good luck getting them out.

[Anonymous No.50871615]

>>50871569
It does. Any amount no matter how small is your personal fuck you to these people with your name on it. It’s like signing the Declaration of Independence. People who down play drs or only drs some would be like people who wouldn’t sign the declaration or put there name off in some corner as small as possible. Drsing as much as you can is like John Hancock. There is literally no downside to drsing, can’t believe it even requires this much discussion

[Anonymous No.50871620]

>>50871557
One who not a DTCC participant?
>>50871577
'Fuck you faggots, I'm fine lying to my fellow investors so long as it personally benefits me'.

[Anonymous No.50871644]

>>50871620
What are you even talking about? It benefits everyone who holds the stock. How doesn’t it? It’s selfless to drs as much as possible. You’re an autistic who gets so hung up on technicalities that you stop seeing the forest for the trees. Even if you are technically correct which I’m not convinced you are, it makes no sense from any perspective for anyone to downplay the importance of drs

[Anonymous No.50871652]

>>50871601
Have you tried to compare the assets of CS to the market cap of the companies they (((supposedly))) hold?

[Anonymous No.50871659]

So whats your thoughts on T+35?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/wm8gwf/ryans_warning_the_countdown_to_moass_has_begun/

Also this gave me hopium with low XX shares
https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/wlrxnr/6472200000000_thats_how_much_we_can_seize_from/

[Anonymous No.50871676]

>>50871644
So we should have everyone go all in on CS, and sell from there too?

[Anonymous No.50871694]

>>50871676
Why not?

[Anonymous No.50871697]

>>50871678
>>50871678
>>50871678
Threaded.

[Anonymous No.50871704]

>>50871552
>>50871601

Companies like computershare and even Gamestop have multiple backups/locations with ledgers of who owns their stock incase of insolvency/building fire. In event of not being able to access it, you just have to wait till someone picks up the holdings on a new system. None of that solves the problem that has been created by DTCC.

[Anonymous No.50871708]

>>50871676
>So we should have everyone go all in on CS, and sell from there too?
Yes.

[Anonymous No.50871717]

>>50871652
I don't see why it matters.
When this start pops off, and if the DTCC has the ability to arbitrarily make its participants pay them, what possible reason would they have not to target CS?
Hedgies are aware of what CS does, they are aware how much DRS hurts them.

CS could literally be 2 guys in a garage with a 2nd hand router, once the DTCC is within margin call territory, im sure they are the first target.

All this is contigent of course of the DTCC actually having the power to liquidate their participants, which I was arguing against in the first place

[Anonymous No.50871719]

>>50871694
If the purpose of CS is to extend and magnify the squeeze and people are selling from it how does that work?

[Anonymous No.50871745]

>>50871719
You’re that guy who is hung up on the concept of the infinity pool aren’t you. Dude it doesn’t matter how much you protest, people are going to sell from cs. They just are. No amount of you trying to sway sentiment is going to change that fact. It is delusional that you think they wouldn’t

[Anonymous No.50871751]

>>50871717
>be CS
>have 5 billion in assets
>get margin called for 20 trillion by the DTCC
>okay, whatever, take our 0.02% kek, you're still fucked

[Anonymous No.50871752]

>>50871676
>>50871719
In his defense, most people have forgotten how DRS started.

>>50871694
>he forgor

[Anonymous No.50871762]

>>50871752
Worse >>50871745

[Anonymous No.50871791]

>>50871762
Don't worry man, I post my pasta for a reason, and it's not get people here to hold for the infinity pool. It's to remind everyone here that it doesn't matter one lick what anyone (shill or otherwise) has to say about how it's going to go down. The people who actually hold the power in this situation are sitting pretty on reddit, much to literally everyone else's chagrin.

[Anonymous No.50872254]

Post split reminder that if:
You have more than four (4) shares of GME, you do not believe in the squeeze.
You are not one hundred percent (100%) drs with computershare, you do not believe in the squeeze.
You do not own any Bed Bath & Beyond ($bbby) shares or options, you do not believe in our lord and savior Ryan Cohen.

Finally, remember to sell on the way down.