DTCC

[Anonymous No.50811145]

discuss The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) ITT

heard there's an upcoming smart contract conference this guy is speaking at

[Anonymous No.50811219]

jannies will just delete the thread don't even bother OP

you can no longer discuss business a finance on a Business & Finance board

[Anonymous No.50811236]

>>50811145

Why do jannies keep deleting this

[Anonymous No.50811243]

Fuck off. Go dump on discord twitter fags. Biz is short

[Anonymous No.50811260]

from another thread
https://dtcc-connection.medium.com/under-the-hood-transforming-infrastructure-for-private-markets-f4e20b8311d2
>At the 2022 DTCC Forum, Stephen Prosperi, DTCC Director Innovation Strategy & Design, spoke with Darren Cannon, BlackRock Managing Director, Global Alternative Operations; Carine M. Schneider, AST Private Company Solutions, Inc. President; and W. Carson McLean, DTCC Managing Director, General Counsel’s Office about the exciting developments and challenges of the private markets.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/darren-cannon-13b1488/
>Managing director, Blackrock
https://www.linkedin.com/in/carineschneider/
>President, board member, AST Private Company Solutions
https://www.linkedin.com/in/wcmclean/
>Managing director, DTCC

[Anonymous No.50811272]

>>50811243
shut the fuck up manlet

[Anonymous No.50811281]

lmao every thread I post
from another thread
https://dtcc-connection.medium.com/under-the-hood-transforming-infrastructure-for-private-markets-f4e20b8311d2
>At the 2022 DTCC Forum, Stephen Prosperi, DTCC Director Innovation Strategy & Design, spoke with Darren Cannon, BlackRock Managing Director, Global Alternative Operations; Carine M. Schneider, AST Private Company Solutions, Inc. President; and W. Carson McLean, DTCC Managing Director, General Counsel’s Office about the exciting developments and challenges of the private markets.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/darren-cannon-13b1488/
>Managing director, Blackrock
https://www.linkedin.com/in/carineschneider/
>President, board member, AST Private Company Solutions
https://www.linkedin.com/in/wcmclean/
>Managing director, DTCC
in gets deleted TOPFUCKINGKEK IMA KEEP POSTING IT

[Anonymous No.50811284]

>>50811145
fuck jannies but this is probably a nothing speaker. we knew about dtcc two years ago, same as we knew about oracle, microsoft, swift et al. the others that showed up at last smartcon had nothing to say and shit dumped

[Anonymous No.50811332]

It's confirmed then
billion dollar project and Chainlink will be in the center of it

[Anonymous No.50811431]

>>50811332
is this the largest project to integrate cl yet?

[Anonymous No.50811520]

Every large institution at SmartCON: "Yeah, so that's a little bit of our thoughts on blockchain, good luck with whatever you guys do here, maybe we can hook up in 5 years or so"

[Anonymous No.50811531]

>>50811520
this

[Anonymous No.50811561]

>kid with 7 years experience shows up at heavily discounted conference

NOTHING-BURGER

[Anonymous No.50811591]

>>50811332
>Chainlink front and centre
>Ethereum pushed off to the side
The way it should be.

[Anonymous No.50811649]

I only have 100k LINK and you said 10mil is minimum amount to retire on. When can I retire from being NEET? It's getting very tough as of late.

[Anonymous No.50811665]

it's a literal who. Are working with Chainlink Labs by any chance?

[Anonymous No.50812116]

>>50811649
Jealous of your stack.

[Anonymous No.50812258]

>>50811520
This, fidelity showed up last year and talked about bitcoin. A year later and fidelity has nothing to do with crypto products, probably a write off for appearing

[Anonymous No.50812356]

DTCC won't exist after the GMEhad, may Allah bring us success against the homosexual hedgie yahud.

[Anonymous No.50812374]

>>50811219
literally why are they deleting this but allowing hundreds of pajeet scams daily?

[Anonymous No.50812479]

>>50811145
The DTCC owns all stocks traded on the stock market, they hold all the stock certificates, since 1997. Who owns the DTCC? The Federal Reserve.
https://franknez.com/who-is-the-dtcc-and-what-are-their-legal-duties/

[Anonymous No.50812523]

>>50812479
key word being "trust"
truth>trust
few.

[Anonymous No.50812858]

>>50812374
makes you wonder right?

[Anonymous No.50812874]

[Anonymous No.50813068]

>>50812858
>>50812874
based anon

[Anonymous No.50813559]

>>50811145
Honestly though fudders, you cant get a BIGGER company than this unless BlackRock itself comes out saying they are attending smartcon.

[Anonymous No.50813659]

The actual Federal Reserve System will be attending SmartCon.

[Anonymous No.50814226]

Their DTCC DSM product which uses public Ethereum was supposed to undergo regulatory approval in Q2.
https://www.dtcc.com/dtcc-connection/articles/2022/march/01/modernizing-the-private-markets-with-dtccs-digital-securities-management-platform

[Anonymous No.50814242]

>>50814226
>DTCC set several new volume records in 2020. The company processed $2.3 quadrillion in securities transactions, up nearly 8% over 2019, and on March 12, it hit a new, single-day peak of 363 million U.S. equity transactions — more than two-and-a-half times that of an average processing day.

[Anonymous No.50814256]

>>50813659

[Anonymous No.50815589]

>>50814242
How long until we moon?

[Anonymous No.50815602]

>>50814242
>>50814226
>>50813659
Insane breadcrumbs. It really looks like the clues were all correct. All of our wildest dreams are going to come true. Its been an honor gentleman, and keep accumulating.

[Anonymous No.50815662]

>>50815602
Maybe this year will be it.

[Anonymous No.50815897]

>>50815662
hope so

[Anonymous No.50815953]

>>50811145
so the literal Jewish banking cartel

[Anonymous No.50816081]

>>50815589
i do think staking will push it up a decent amount as people start to "get it"
smart money will be people getting in prior to v1
the other thing that would help would be a big name (f100) announcing that they're using it

[Anonymous No.50816101]

>>50816081
I hope you anons bought lpl when it was under $1. Im getting staking early and yes i will be posting "pool's closed" when it happens. Either way 1k might just be this year after all. Ccip, stake, iso20022 etc

[Anonymous No.50816162]

>>50816101
yes 186er here

[Anonymous No.50816179]

>>50811145
They are a bunch of fraudsters and conniving jews and I hope the gamestop redditors fuck them a new asshole but I know that they will pull some kikery so I don't have any hope for justice.

[Anonymous No.50816346]

>>50814226
the DSM platform acts like a blockchain oracle? So no LINK needed?

[Anonymous No.50816387]

>>50816101
Cant wait for twitter niggers to get burned on LPL. It will be the three for free meme come to life kek bancor, celsius, and linkpool

[Anonymous No.50816704]

>>50816387
(You)

[Anonymous No.50816732]

>>50816387
fucking based fuck those twitterino muhreens
>>50816704
lmao gottem

[Anonymous No.50816748]

>>50811520
This will be 90% of them this year. Either way, I'm sure these companies will be onboarded eventually and staking is most likely going to be announced at smartcon.

[Anonymous No.50816758]

>>50816732

[Anonymous No.50817885]

>>50811332
>>50811591
NOM NOM NOM

[Anonymous No.50818052]

>>50814256
Based. Bizarre to think sometimes real insiders are here

[Anonymous No.50818244]

https://www.dtcc.com/dtcc-connection/articles/2022/march/01/modernizing-the-private-markets-with-dtccs-digital-securities-management-platform

[Anonymous No.50818255]

[Anonymous No.50818513]

>>50814256
Great example of link baggie delusion thinking le swift breadcrumbs make it $150. No one in the finance world gives a fuck that low level associate w 7 years experience is attending a half off nerd conference. 2 more years

[Anonymous No.50818568]

>>50818513
>No one in the finance world gives a fuck that low level associate w 7 years experience is attending a half off nerd conference
What about Swift itself posting Sergey interviews about smart securities on its website?

[Anonymous No.50818734]

>>50818255
> Hyperledger Besu
checked

[Anonymous No.50819200]

>>50814226
>was supposed to undergo regulatory approval in Q2.
did they end up getting approved or not?

[Anonymous No.50819223]

>>50818513
>le
le ledditor is here!

[Anonymous No.50820859]

>>50818568
Swift could announce it will be using chainlink for all worldwide transfers and the price would dump 15%

[Anonymous No.50821022]

>>50820859
The price of Bitcoin, yes.

[Anonymous No.50821042]

>>50811145
>Stephen (((Prosperi)))

[Anonymous No.50821067]

>>50811272
The half-chink-half-jew will be in charge of fraudulently inflating the Bitcoin market with cash-backed (=unbacked) futures, just like how the CME and LME inflated the gold market.

[Anonymous No.50821131]

Who exactley wil run these compliance oracles?

Linkpool or Chainlink/Chainlink Labs? My bet is not the latter....

Do not buy the LINK token.
Do not buy the LPL token.
Sleep well in your level 1 Pleb Pod and own nothing. Your welcome.

[Anonymous No.50821269]

>>50811145

[Anonymous No.50821274]

PRIOR TO SECOND ETHER ALL TIME HIGH PRICE
THERE WILL BE A MINUSCULE AMOUNT OF TIME (FIVE MINUTES TOPS) IN WHICH THERE WILL BE A CHAINLINK RUN TO $60.
THIS IS THE FINAL OPPORTUNITY FOR CRYPTO TRADERS
TO SELL THEIR CHAINLINK TOKENS TO LOCK IN GAINS
LOOK AT THE DUMP ORDERS - IF THERE ARE INSUFFICIENT ORDERS PRESENT, THERE WILL BE A PUMP!

[Anonymous No.50821290]

>>50818255

[Anonymous No.50821327]

>>50813659
Can anyone shed any light on what being part of the federal reserve system actually means?

[Anonymous No.50821362]

>>50821327
>Can anyone shed any light on what being part of the federal reserve system actually means?
See >>50821290

[Anonymous No.50821438]

>>50821362
Jonny?

[Anonymous No.50821441]

>>50814256
They don't want us to know this, but fuck'em.
https://cdn.ihsmarkit.com/www/pdf/0921/TradeServ-Credit-FAQ-OSTTRA-branded_F_21-Sep.pdf

[Anonymous No.50821477]

>>50821441
will they announce using cl or will it be white label?

[Anonymous No.50821507]

>>50812874
This runs deeper than any of you anons understand.
https://osttra.com/articles/cme-group-and-ihs-markit-complete-joint-venture-and-launch-osttra-a-new-post-trade-services-company/

[Anonymous No.50821563]

>>50821438
don't be a burrly cunt mate
jus sharen me dayta

[Anonymous No.50821615]

>>50821477
typically deals like this where old gaurd wants to "own" new tech its in the form a an exclusive licensing deal.

cl (linkpool) maintain the oracles and codebase while the old gaurd pays them insane amounts of money but will never publically speak on it.

[Anonymous No.50821645]

what if chainlink is like military tech that only gets passed on to the plebs after 5-10 years in service?

[Anonymous No.50821660]

>>50821274
>ponzi spider vitalik infographic now being used for Chainlink

Insanely bullish

[Anonymous No.50821765]

>>50821615
then why do they attend smartcon? It seem they have been hiding until smartcon and the flip will be switched.

[Anonymous No.50821917]

Interestingly enough, the all time link/btc chart looks like its primed for another chance at a breakout just around the time smartcon hits. If we get past 50k sats and can hold, reversal confirmed. On the other hand, if we get rejected, could be another 6 months to a year of crab.

[Anonymous No.50823050]

>>50821765
oh sweetie
do you know how many of us have thought that the past two years about various projects associated with chainlink?
we're all hoping it happens but don't get too excited

[Anonymous No.50823300]

August 2022... How time flies

[Anonymous No.50823334]

Chainlink is too risky to not be 100% in with 99% of your net worth

[Anonymous No.50824337]

>>50811145
i was trying to recall some details revealed by the gamestop fiasco and what it revealed about these clearinghouses; specifically that the liquidity isnt all that deep and are quite fragile. was it dtcc that instructed to halt the buying of gamestop?

[Anonymous No.50824381]

>>50824337
oh its here
>>50812479

[Nexo is insolvent No.50824463]

>>50811219
>>50811236
There is a very violent attempt to short Chainlink since yesterday.
The current BTC dump is a result of it and has caused Chainlink to exhibit relative strength and even flipped the LINK/ETH rsi to bullish.
It seems the corrupt jannies are still trying to suppress the price.

There is a war currently going on to stop the price suppression.
I don't know who is on the buyer side but for once it seems there is a strong backer behind it.
On the opposite side we have Nexo and JP Morgan.
Sam got hit with the SOL hack and fud on the news of him attending the SmartCon.

Very powerful hands are going all out and it doesn't seem to be working for now.

[Anonymous No.50824511]

>>50811145
What's interesting is the effect this would have on the illegal naked stock short selling on things like GME.
Tokenizing stocks would make it very difficult to cheat and it would be possible to check how many stocks are owned by a company.
It may make it possible to withdraw stocks from an exchange quickly and cause a bank run on liquidity if one exchange went too heavy on their price manipulation and short selling.

[Anonymous No.50824833]

>>50824511
Exchanges would also be able to prove that they actually hold all of the stocks owed to their depositors - imagine the havoc that would cause as every investor rushes to platforms that can prove 100% solvency

[Anonymous No.50824888]

>>50814256
god i remember the fednow larp

[Anonymous No.50825313]

>>50824833
Another fun thing would be the result of this tokenization process to the currentlly shorted stocks.
The gig for stocks like GME would be up as it would make it impossible to hide naked shorting the moment tokenization takes place.

[Anonymous No.50825793]

>>50816387
How do LPL get burned, faggot? It's the only way, to get revenue from Link network. It's not much but it's honest work.

And jonneh is in Chainlink team.
>t. 6 figures LPL holder

[Anonymous No.50825957]

>>50825793
>It's the only way, to get revenue from Link network.
That's not how staking works but you keep dreaming :)

[Anonymous No.50826116]

>>50811520
jej

[Anonymous No.50826864]

>>50821441
>OSTTRA is a joint venture owned 50/50 by CME Group and S&P Global.
>S&P Global Inc. is an American publicly traded corporation headquartered in Manhattan, New York City. Its primary areas of business are financial information and analytics. Revenue: 8.297 billion USD (2021)
>CME Group Inc. is an American global markets company. It is the world's largest financial derivatives exchange, and trades in asset classes that include agricultural products, currencies, energy, interest rates, metals, stock indexes and cryptocurrencies futures. Revenue: 4.52 billion USD (2021)
WAGMI

[Anonymous No.50826949]

>>50821441
>>50826864
>A new interactive TradeServ GUI will replace the DSMatch GUI.
based terry says that white people dont mind the tui and guis were only created so that niggers could use computers

[Anonymous No.50827479]

>https://www.theice.com/technology/ice-link
what does this stuff mean, when I read through these tradfi docs my eyes glaze over from the terminology

[Anonymous No.50828243]

>>50827479
Finally someone mentioning Ice Link again.
Few months ago there was a big thread about it with decent crumbs. Will share tomorrow if this is still up.

[Anonymous No.50828812]

>>50821327
>Can anyone shed any light on what being part of the federal reserve system actually means?
It means the WHOLE derivatives market will bend the knee to chainchink.

[Anonymous No.50829379]

>>50828243
bump for this

[Anonymous No.50829552]

>>50827479
It's a scam you stupid fuck

[Anonymous No.50830797]

dtcc > project whitney
ya im thinking we made it years ago

[Anonymous No.50831157]

I like the whole crash BTC thing they keep trying to prevent link breakouts

[Anonymous No.50831987]

>>50831157
Soon.

[Anonymous No.50832560]

Holy shit, icelink froze my wallet

[Anonymous No.50832678]

>>50828243
>icelink = chainlink
Holy shit I’m bying chainlink fence right now

[Anonymous No.50832716]

>>50824463
>Sam got hit with the SOL hack and fud on the news of him attending the SmartCon.
holy shit. is this all in the name of accumulation and shaking out weak hands? or is it something more nefarious?

[Anonymous No.50833035]

>>50832716
They want Sergey bankrupt to take away the control of the project and token away from him.
What does a VC do?
They buy a token at a low price as an insider in order to get to dump it at an easy x100 with no work. Because VCs couldn't do this with Chainlink they either ignored it or tried to fud it to pump their own shitcoins.

However there is another way of being a vampire VC which fits better the banking cartel.
What does this cartel want? Full control.
How can they get full control over Chainlink?
There are two ways. Control the majority of the tokens or take over the Chainlink company and control the network development and changes.

We witnessed the first method in the last 2 years when Sergey was forced to dump his tokens at a discount and dumped 5 times more tokens then he should have if they did not go all out to suppress the price.

They control the BTC development team and made ETH into their bitch with this last Tornado scam ban, but they currently don't control Chainlink directly.
Sergey wants to live in this society but does not understand that great evil is trying to get full control over it for evil purposes.

[Anonymous No.50833208]

>>50833035
If that was the case he would hurry up and release 0.1 to get a quick pump flowing. The market values product releases

[Anonymous No.50833219]

>>50833035
Thank you for these posts. I hope Sergey is up to the task and that no harm comes to him and his team. I believe in him.

[Anonymous No.50833252]

>>50833208
He is not dumping his tokens currently.
The price only matters when he is trying to get more funds.
Giving out a 5% staking reward is price agnostic.

They should have some funds for a few years, but the attack was successful in forcing him to dump 50 more million tokens last year.
There is also the component of trying to remove us.

The moment Sergey will need funding for his team again he may get another even more violent attack, but he should have enough to survive until CCIP, staking and a few other features are released and the price recovers.

[Anonymous No.50833525]

>>50815662
>>50815897
I'm so tired bros.

[Anonymous No.50833585]

>>50814242
It's interesting to note that Sergey made the announcement of staking and CCIP in January and the staking collateral for the initial DON network was moved in April.
This would have been perfectly timed for the launch of this DTCC DLT service.
The Ether merge delay caused the current delays and price crash.
It was not part of the initial plan to release it later this year.


Another interesting thing to note is that FTX has tokenized stock trading on their platform already using a different method which allows trading of stocks all the time like for crypto with reduced liquidity.

Maybe they have more to do with Chainlink than just SOL and we may hear more of this side from Sam in the SmartCon.

[Anonymous No.50833618]

>>50833219
You're welcome.
They won't directly harm him until he is useful for the project and he is more useful than problematic.
The problem may come the day when the project has released most of the features and it becomes more of a maintenance project, and if Sergey accumulates a lot of wealth.
What he does with his wealth could affect the world almost as much as his Chainlink project.

[Anonymous No.50833630]

The WEF is an international lobbying firm comprised of 1,000 or so member companies. It is based in Switzerland and staffed by predominantly Europeans. It is a vehicle to promote the interests of multi-national megacorps. To become a member, a company must turn over a minimum of $5 BILLION USD every year. In total, their member companies control approximately $5 trillion in assets.

The cumulative liquid ad spend for the member companies goes into the hundreds of millions to billions range. What this means is that if they want to astroturf a trend, person, or idea: they absolutely have the means to do it.

Being an unelected, totally unaccountable global group, they're able to skirt laws of their host countries. They've been referred to as a terrorist organization by experts and citizens of countries all across the globe.

It's time we stand united against terrorist organizations like the WEF that wish to subvert and destabilize our countries. Everyone can play their role by voicing their concerns to their elected representatives, boycotting, sanctioning and divesting from member companies, and applying social and electoral pressure to all their "young leaders" and affiliates.

The "far-right" and "white supremacist domestic terrorists" hoaxes are inventions and products of the WEF. COVID and all the responses to it were a WEF creation. The explosion of in-your-face homosexuality and degeneracy is a WEF creation. The effective poisoning of our food, water, and minds is a product of the WEF.

For extra seethe, sign this petition and have your "automated internet friends" sign it too and let's remind them who is in charge.

https://www.change.org/p/declare-the-wef-a-terrorist-organization

[Anonymous No.50833632]

>>50833618
I hope he buys funko pops for starving Africans.

[Anonymous No.50833729]

Good thread, reminds me of old crumb threads

WAAGMI

[Anonymous No.50833813]

>>50828243
Bump

[Anonymous No.50833975]

>>50828243
Okay here it is.

Now look at the Osstra roadmap
>Ice Link integration

[Anonymous No.50833996]

This really makes u wonder doesn't it

[Anonymous No.50834644]

>>50833525
all my shit is red, even things I thought were sustainable like qom started to die, send me help in the form of rope

[Anonymous No.50834818]

>>50811219
Damn, I got my link thread deleted too yesterday

[Anonymous No.50834864]

>>50827479
>>50828243
>>50833975
>>50833996

Not sure about ICE Link, here in a thread from 2020
>>>/biz/thread/S23472142#p23475346
Look at the date of the last pdf, 2015

[Anonymous No.50834869]

>>50833975
>>50833996
shieet new crumbs, tasty

[Anonymous No.50834900]

>>50834864
>ICE used to use Blockstream for their crypto price feed product. maybe they're switching to Chainlink? pic is their CSO, Samson Mow


https://www.coindesk.com/business/2022/03/01/samson-mow-exits-blockstream-to-focus-on-nation-state-bitcoin-adoption/

[Anonymous No.50834905]

>>50833996
What's ICE Link? This is the first time I've come across this.

[Anonymous No.50834923]

>>50834900
https://suredbits.com/discreet-log-contracts-blockstream-crypto-garages-contract/

https://blog.blockstream.com/en-transacting-bitcoin-based-p2p-derivatives/

[Anonymous No.50834939]

>>50834923
https://blockstream.com/cryptofeed/

https://www.theice.com/market-data/cryptocurrencies

shadow fork?

[Anonymous No.50835053]

>>50834900
>>50834923
>>50834939
Yeah these crumbs don't taste too good.

[Anonymous No.50835055]

>>50834939
More white label than shadow fork imo.

[Anonymous No.50835061]

>>50833996
Okay ignore this. Looks like Ice Link is just a data delivery company
>https://www.theice.com/market-data/cryptocurrencies

Im loosing it bro's

Unfortunately this also means Project Witney of DTCC, with their 'compliance oracle', is using Ice Link as a data provider and not Chainlink. See their roadmap posted above.

BUT

Stephen Prosperi is still attending Smartcon. Thats a fact.
Why on earth would he be there? Only thing i can think of is for the Big Mac with Sergey!

>>50834905
>>50834869

[Anonymous No.50835085]

Bros it’s been 5 fucking years… all of these fucking crumbs but what the fuck does it do to the price? Nothing… I dunno how much longer I can go like this.

[Anonymous No.50835090]

>>50835061
>Stephen Prosperi is still attending Smartcon.
we can only wait for now. probably better to ready yourselves for disappointment

[Anonymous No.50835097]

>>50835061
Ok this is good fud (the fact that one trail of breadcrumbs turned out to be false).

[Anonymous No.50835104]

>>50835061
>Unfortunately this also means Project Witney of DTCC, with their 'compliance oracle', is using Ice Link as a data provider and not Chainlink.
Prosperi spearheaded Project Whitney. I think it's very unlikely he is speaking at Smartcon if LINK doesn't have any ties to Project Whitney.

[Anonymous No.50835157]

>>50835104
True. Would be kinda absurd if he joined Chainlink conference and said they are using their own oracle

[Anonymous No.50835179]

>>50835061
It’s over

[Anonymous No.50835180]

>>50835104
>>50835157
after everything thats happened I have zero expectations except for betrayal... kind of a guarantee at this point

[Anonymous No.50835184]

>>50835157
There are no other oracle solutions LINK won this race 5 years aco

[Anonymous No.50835196]

>>50835184
blockstream provides them price feeds

cant you fucking read?

just another disappointment. It never ends with LINK.

[Anonymous No.50835252]

What's even the point of breadcrumb seeking like this. Are we not all experienced in how it goes? We find any document saying oracle, trustless or a slide showing a cube. We go crazy saying it's link and then 5 years later you never hear of it again.

[Anonymous No.50835253]

>>50835196
So what's your Link stack at? Dare you to tell us.

[Anonymous No.50835263]

>>50835253
kys dataminer

[Anonymous No.50835280]

>>50835253
I had 20k BNB which I traded almost for LINK in 2018 due to biz shills

worst fucking decision ever.

[Anonymous No.50835288]

>>50835280
almost all

[Anonymous No.50835329]

This is the main rehearsal for SmartCon, Sergey is gonna bring adelyn on stage like this

[Anonymous No.50835334]

>>50835280
Yeh, so what's your Link stack at now? You never said.

[Anonymous No.50836131]

>>50835280
Hopefully you don't regret that for too many more years. But you have every right to Seethe about it

[Anonymous No.50836153]

>>50835334
He won't tell us because he doesn't like to tell actual lies. See how he diverts without actually answering?
Everyone owns Link. Especially these pricks. I hope they get scammed for the rest of it the way they probably did with Bancor and Celsius.

[Anonymous No.50836452]

>>50835196
>blockstream provides them price feeds
wtf is Blockstream? I've just looked them up, they don't even have a token. Are they actually a CL competitor?

[Anonymous No.50836590]

>>50835280
Figured this would be the case with the bitter "fud" lately. You bought the hype and mania when link price started to actually move and some crumbs started to project to reality. Smart OGs knew the cycles are fast in crypto and its better to jump to new stuff in bullmarket. Now it's time to get back in. (Always kept a suicide stack of 10k)

[Anonymous No.50837310]

>>50833996
The problem with all of these institutional grade services is they no doubt would require staking to be at v2 by now to go into effect

We need this timeline sped up. We don't even have 0.1 yet. Vitalik and his faggot devs have really ruined 2022. ETH is a fat, out of shape horse that is slowing the calvary. We needed ETH2 by June or July. All of this has slowed adoption and institutions, all because fur fags "need a break" instead of getting shit done like the og btc devs

[Anonymous No.50837584]

>>50833585
>The Ether merge delay caused the current delays and price crash.
nigger that was the shorts being done

[Anonymous No.50838614]

>>50837584
You mean Vitalik dumping on the market?

Also why are the LINK threads getting deleted?
Is the Nexo paid janitor shill force going all out as they lose everything?
They should be already $14 million in the hole at current prices but can't cover their 7-8 million shorted LINK kek.
If they try to buy back now 7 million tokens the price could pump to $20.

[Anonymous No.50838745]

Jannies keep deleting link threads, interesting. Has it occurred to anyone else yet that we are sitting near the bottom of the bear market, and 10k stack linklets already have near 6 figures? The next couple of years are going to be wild (yeah yeah 2 more years have fun discord trannies)

[Anonymous No.50838834]

>>50838745
Nexo going bankrupt in real time.
Jannies seething and going all out before they lose their job.

Nexo already $14 million in the hole and can't buy back 7-8 million tokens at current prices without a giga pump to $15-20 generating more than $50 million in losses.
Also lost over 200k LINK in Bancor for another 2-3 million losses kek.

Nexo is hemorrhaging money everywhere.


By the way we should go to the 4chan irc and ask mods to do something to try to remove those jannies.

[Anonymous No.50838864]

Guys I have 1400 LINK tokens will I make it

[Anonymous No.50838914]

>>50838864
Probably by 2026, if you mean enough passive income to never work again. Remember they have almost given up on fudding link at this point, now its all about convincing newfags they can't get enough to make it (the real suicide stack was 10k/100k, staking apy will be 3%, you won't be able to stake without linkpool etc).

[Anonymous No.50839077]

>>50838914
>>50838745
Nice FUD dog. The sui/make it stacks are 100 and 1000. $81,000 is FUD.

[Anonymous No.50839100]

>>50839077
He means 20:26 TONIGHT!

[Anonymous No.50839118]

>>50839077
checked but note this exact same poster was posting the suicide stack is 10k link in another thread last week. discord trannies are super transparent, post demoralization together for a few days, then irrational euphoria, the goal is to confuse newfags and make them think we're all schizo (we kind of are) and that link is a cult (it sort of is) so they don't buy any at all.

[Anonymous No.50839123]

>>50811145
This is harassment. You are committing a Fucking harassment MotherFuckers! Take your happy little ass conspiracy theories and go Fuck off to Reddit or somewhere else.

[Anonymous No.50839149]

>>50839123
also this is a discord tranny posing as a bulgarian, note this shit is all played up to make link holders look irrational/schizo and people ignore the actual crumbs like the ones littered in this thread.

[Anonymous No.50839175]

Has anyone noticed how one tactic to derail Link threads is to try to shift the conversation/debate to the size of a 'suicide stack'? Completely meaningless, useless debate about the length of a piece of string. It gets introduced into almost any Link thread and is boring af, which of course is the plan all along

[Anonymous No.50839216]

>>50839175
It originated as inspiration to buy a stack, as it was a small amount anyone could afford. When anons got paranoid that newfags from leddit might get interested, it got twisted into a demoralization tactic to keep them out. That's all it is now.

[Anonymous No.50839227]

>>50838864
Making it is a process which takes 5-10 years.
The key to this process is to invest in good projects with a proper risk management and to increase you wealth over a longer period of time using a system to bypass your emotions.
You will get a nice boost from Chainlink and could reach make it territory with just this depending on how things evolve, but you need to learn how to invest properly, and how to trade the market a bit too to understand the markets.
Also you should keep accumulating more money with your job and keep investing.

[Anonymous No.50839293]

>>50839227
link will run like 2017 eth isnt?

[Anonymous No.50839337]

>>50839293
It might. It won't be telegraphed, but eventually its going to happen. Strategically soon is a good time to do it, newfags are priced out of any significant stack size, oldfags are demoralized, and many got rugged via celsius/bancor et al, this is probably the best time to let it run, on the eve of staking, and forever price out retail. But we'll see.

[Anonymous No.50839358]

>>50839077
Seriously is 100 LINK the best you can do?
Don't you feel any greed and the desire to accumulate more?

The original 10k suicide stack 4 years ago bought at a 0.3 cents average would have cost $3k which would now allow you to buy 400 tokens with the same amount of money.
Maybe it's someone from a poorer country investing this which makes it okay for their standards and lower costs of living, but if you are working in a western country you should be able to invest more than that.

Crypto is a time multiplier which multiplies the amount of money invested which represents working time and reduces the time to make it.
Why spend only $700 if you know it's going to do a x50-100 and not try to spend at least 1 year of your spared income to buy in the accumulation range it was in for 2 months?

[Anonymous No.50839374]

>>50839216
Well, stop banging on about it then!

[Anonymous No.50839420]

>>50839337
How can you 'price out retail' when you have 18 decimals in a Link? I'd buy it at any price. If the token price is high then this means things are working and it's therefore a good investment. I suppose if the reward rate was crap that might affect things, but why would it be?

[Anonymous No.50839458]

>>50839374
I feel obligated to call out fud niggers, they have shat up this board for too long. Also this anon is lying
>>50839358
I was here 4 years ago, it was always 1k/10k, 10k suicide started getting memed in 2019 after mainnet/coinbase/google pump as anons realized leddit was going to start realizing they'd been had, and they wanted to keep moonboys from even attempting to accumulate. Suicide stack comes from bitcoin talk forums, where they decided you should own 1 millionth of the supply, which is 21 bitcoin, the original bitcoin suicide stack. For link, 1 millionth of the supply is 1 thousand link. The majority of anons who stumble on /biz/ have barely anything to invest at the start anyways, but thanks to a great many buying link early, people joke about thousands of dollars like its pennies now.

[Anonymous No.50839494]

>>50839420
Only in terms of a significant stack size I mean. If retail realizes what link is, they can still accumulate lots now. But right now, retail (not /biz/ even though /biz/ is also retail, but the majority of retail investors overall) are out of money, struggling, and assume crypto is a scam.

[Anonymous No.50839510]

>>50839420
The staking APY *without* subsidies will be derived from fee revenue. The higher the token price, the worse the APY, so P/E ratios will eventually be how we determine if LINK is over/under-valued. With a staking subsidy paid as a fixed percentage of LINK tokens though the price is irrelevant, any purchase made right now has essentially a guarantee of growing by a sizeable amount in the next few years.

[Anonymous No.50839526]

>>50839293
It seems the price suppression and bull run was planned years ago.
The bull run started earlier than planned because they wanted to pump scams without Chainlink and realize a full cycle before the release of the real Chainlink product.
That's why this time it had less power behind it and crashed very quickly.

It seems like the stars are aligning and maybe we get what we were waiting for in September.
I don't know how it will run unfortunately.
The price dynamics behind ETH are caused by users interacting with ETH understanding its value.
LINK is hidden from most users, but institutions probably finished accumulating in the current range LINK seems to be exiting.

Price suppression with accumulation by big whales for 2 years means they plan to dump next at a much higher price and they want to make a lot of money after spending over 9 figures in their price suppression scheme.

We should revisit the previous ATH easily once the dynamic changes, and could go to 3 digit territory depending on the state of the market.

It seems I can finally redo this chart and we are entering the liftoff phase after a 20 month period of facing reality.
This is a recurrent model in tech companies and happened for ETH and BTC.
The 2021 ETH pump was ETH entering the liftoff 3rd phase Chainlink is currently entering.

[Anonymous No.50839532]

>>50839420
>How can you 'price out retail' when you have 18 decimals in a Link?
Because, when it gets more expensive people expect it to have less multiplier gains.
Link going from $10 to $1000 is x100, but if someone buys in at $1000 then if it makes it to $10,000 it's only a x10 multiplier... IF it makes it that high. Realistically, the higher the value, the less likely it's going to get any higher, and when you combine that with ever decreasing multipliers then people will decide to put their money elsewhere in the hopes of "making it". That's how someone gets priced out.

[Anonymous No.50839570]

>>50839458
no
10k was the real original suicide stack.
But it's okay times have changed.
You can't buy ETH at $10 anymore but those who bough it at $100 still made a x40 in a year, and could get another x10 soon.

[Anonymous No.50839606]

>>50839570
It wasn't. Every time someone says this I ask them to provide a cap from that period (pre 2019) or an archive link to prove it, none have ever done so in 3 years. I was there, nobody was saying 10k suicide stack in 2017/2018. There's no logic behind it anyways, I already explained the original logic, 1 millionth of the supply, taken from the bitcoin talk forums.

[Anonymous No.50839703]

>>50818052
>He's not an insider
Insider here, staking is going to be released on August 24th 2022.

[Anonymous No.50839747]

>>50839532
Exactly, note one of the oldest copy pastas is just an anon going on about how 100k link isn't even enough to make it. That said if you knew an investment was going to 10x even over a 3-4 year period you'd put every last dollar you could into it, its not about needing a 100 or 1000x to make it, its about understanding an investment. The shitcoin casino is a mirage, because the overwhelming majority are just scams, and if you're lucky enough to hit on one, you wouldn't have the confidence to put in more than a hundred bucks, and the only way to make it that way is buying something like shib at the absolute bottom and holding the whole way up. Its all a grift to milk retail, musical chairs that you'll never win, just another form of playing the lottery.

[Anonymous No.50839773]

>>50839606
It is for I was there.
Nobody was thinking of saving discussions for the future at that time because we were focused on discussing Chainlink instead and letting greed make us think we would reach 3 digits in a year after everyone realized what we knew.
Turns out we were too early...

How poor do you have to be to not be able to afford to invest $3000 in crypto?
The idea behind the suicide stack was to prevent suicide upon realizing you wasted a x100-1000 potential with lunch money.
If you have time to spend hours on /biz/ for months or years then you should find a way to be able to afford to invest 20% of your income for a year in it which should be more than $3000.


The only exception is people from the third world who have lower living costs and wages.
But even then the idea should be to invest a year's worth of your wages to reach retirement after reaching 100 years of your income.

[Anonymous No.50839828]

>>50839773
You're just digging the hole deeper, it wasn't 3 digits in a year, it was 4, 1keoy was a meme from the very beginning (of course few but the most ardent moonboys believed it'd happen in a single year but that's besides the point). Also there's plenty of caps saved from back then, I don't have any because I don't save caps but if there was one that said 10k is the suicide stack it would be spammed 24/7 because discord trannies are obsessed with forever fudding out newfags.

[Anonymous No.50839859]

>>50811145
Uh, if the dtcc wants to tokenize its assets ( the entirety of the stock market) and remove the inefficiency and time lag of the dtcc > clearinghouse > brokerage> (you) system by converting it into a system of smart contracts validated by chainlink nodes, that means all stock trades each day would be part of the daily steam of jobs for link nodes which means chainlink as an asset would have to have sufficient collateral to back the entirety of the stock market daily. And the nodes would receive payment for the entire transaction volume of the stock market the way brokerages earn fees now.

I’m going to scream.

[Anonymous No.50839904]

>>50839828
There are arbitrary levels to "making it" and this was the foundation of Assblaster saying that 10k was not quite enough to really make it (AKA having over 9 figures from LINK) instead AB said 10k chainlink would be plenty to live a comfortable life and never work again, which is also the definition of "making it" for lots of people.
1k was always the suicide stack however, because it only cost 300 dollars when Link was 30 cents, but 1k link will earn you enough gains to potentially reinvest and build your folio with at least some kind of cash.

[Anonymous No.50839929]

>>50839859
based

[Anonymous No.50839994]

>>50839175
pic related

[Anonymous No.50839995]

>>50839904
This I agree with, however assblaster and others probably underestimated how huge link would grow. Just on the crumbs in this thread, 1k is fud, and 10k link stacks would be looking at mid 6 figures in passive income already. Of course the timeline is the big question mark, you probably won't see link stabilize over 1k until late 2023/24 at the earliest, and retail staking may take a while as well. And its entirely possible this is all a cock tease and we're still stuck waiting a few more years before it happens anyways. But once v1.0 staking releases, if its profitable, suppression strategies will no longer be viable, so speculation alone will start to push the price anyways similar to eth, which is probably 95% speculative value vs 5% actual value.

[Anonymous No.50840065]

>>50839828
LINK didn't go to $1000 in 2019.

You have some narcissism issues which will cause you extreme pain in the next bull run.

The reason they don't spam a 10k LINK suicide stack fud is because it makes no sense when the price of the token changed and the expectations for the future price too.
There was a time when newfags kept spamming the new 1k suicide stack meme, but it seems even that changed to 100 LINK now.

In the end it's stupid to define a size for a suicide stack when everyone has different living costs and different investment horizons.
The correct method is to define the living cost requirements for retirement and to make some planning to see how many years it would take with standard returns and investment to reach it.

For people using the stock market for FIRE the recommendation is to increase the amount and % of spared money as much as possible.
I don't have the numbers here but if you can invest 50% of your income in the stock market properly with lower returns than the crypto market you can make it in 10-12 years.

When investing in crypto the returns are a lot higher, but the volatility too which requires different skills to control greed, however the idea should be the same.
You need to invest a higher % of your income to reach retirement faster.
Investing $700 for someone with a 30k income is pathetic and shows a real lack of self control and willpower.

The minimum number should be 20% of your yearly income. In this case having only $700 to invest in a year would be acceptable if your yearly income is $3500 which is acceptable for a third world country, but would not qualify as a suicide stack for someone with a $100k income.
At least not if your intention was to prevent suicide.

[Anonymous No.50840091]

>>50839995
Eventually it has to become more profitable for BTC and ETH whales to stop suppressing the price and instead start longing the shit out of LINK. They know just as much as we do how huge the oracle market will be in the coming future and the past few years have all been an elaborate game to try and shake out as much retail as possible. At some point it becomes in the whales' best interest to betray each other instead of collaborating to suppress the price, and I think a monthly candle with +$10-20 will confirm the run up into the mid 100s as VCs and exchanges will rush to buy up as much link as they can from a dwindling open market supply. Gonna be a fun couple of years regardless, just like how the last few years have been this mystical period of "will it happen or won't it happen". I think I am confident enough to say that it IS going to happen 100% and 1k+ link is inevitable.

[Anonymous No.50840132]

>>50840091
how to make sure not to sell too early or late?

[Anonymous No.50840143]

>>50840065
For the thousandth time, the suicide stack isn't based on the amount you invested, its based on having 1 millionth of the supply of a deflationary asset.

[Anonymous No.50840182]

>>50840132
Other than taking small profits to feel comfortable, you shouldn't be considering selling at all. One of the reasons the fud on here is so bitter is all the anons who were sure link would get an eth like run last cycle, and either quit their job early or spent money they figured they would have shortly, and got fucked back into the wage cage.

[Anonymous No.50840203]

>>50811520
this
We all should no more kid ourselves that its going to be anything more since it was always like this

[Anonymous No.50840215]

>>50840132
Don't sell all of it at once and watch higher timeframes like the monthly and weekly using a combination of leading and lagging indicators. Personally I have income separate from my link stack so I don't have to ever sell. The plan was always to retire on staking income, or watch it all crash to zero.

[Anonymous No.50840261]

>>50840091
The entire purpose of suppression was to accumulate more, but when staking releases (1.0, 0.1 I don't think is enough of a supply shock to matter) suppression is pointless, because you're fighting against a true supply shock while at the same time you could just simply be staking what you've already accumulated and continue to accumulate more of the supply when staking apy is higher early on. In fact 0.1 along may be the end of a good amount of the suppression, because there will be some large entities who will get in on that, and will have financial incentive to pump the price already.
>inb4 crypto markets aren't manipulated and you're all schizos

[Anonymous No.50840297]

>>50840065
I’m sorry anon but you’re deranged and maybe drunk? 1k sui, 10k make it, simple as. Always been that way and I’m not a newfag so I don’t need to read your wall of words lol.

[Anonymous No.50840334]

>>50839859
um.... bros?? this can't be true. there's no way this can be true.... right?

[Anonymous No.50840391]

>>50840334
Just to temper expectations, swift breadcrumbs started to appear out in the open for the first time in 2021 (as in swift openly mentioning chainlink, appearing at smartcon etc) and the soonest that integration might happen is November 2022, over a year later. This DTCC stuff could still be a few years down the pipeline, but regardless its fantastic news, and at some point speculators WILL frontrun actual adoption.

[Anonymous No.50840499]

>>50840261
It's kino as fuck to be alive in this time period. I will always remember my friend who told me to research oracles and smart contracts back in 2018. Didn't say anything else, but I went and found Chainlink that night and read the whitepaper, saw the 42 threads and all the breadcrumbs and something inside me fundamentally changed, and I bought a 10k stack the first day I ever learned a thing about oracles. I have been nonstop researching and keeping up with LINK ever since because of all the energy around this single project, whether positive or negative it all meant something and we were all FUCKING RIGHT. I will always owe a debt of gratitude to the anons who spent days and days and weeks explaining everything in excruciating detail and investigating the tiniest crumbs of evidence for new partnerships and development. I fucking love all my fellow linkmarines.

[Anonymous No.50840520]

>>50839859
What would be the price of link then?

[Anonymous No.50840522]

>>50840391
Dtcc go live for their new platform is aug 2022

[Anonymous No.50840534]

>>50839458
>For link, 1 millionth of the supply is 1 thousand link
I should add that this goes for the fully diluted supply. If/when 90-99% of tokens are locked in staking contracts, circulating supply will only be 10-100 MM tokens, so 1/millionth would be 10-100 LINK

[Anonymous No.50840559]

>>50840522
checked but is link going to be integrated into the new platform right away? That's why they're only crumbs, we don't know yet. Although if that's what they're announcing at smartcon holy fuck, this will be link's EEA moment. What I don't get though is wouldn't full link staking be required to handle that, and wouldn't they need the merge to already have gone through for that? So I think we're jumping the gun a little bit.

[Anonymous No.50840593]

>>50840499
checked and based, fuck fud for fun niggers, love to fellow marines

[Anonymous No.50841106]

>>50840391
Yea, our curse is always being early. But tokenization of real world assets is without a doubt the thesis for the next bull run, the way this last one was defi and nfts. Actually we should be looking into projects that do that right now.

[Anonymous No.50841308]

>>50841106
Serious question though why are jannies deleting literally every link thread? I think the only reason this one is still up is because they deleted it (DTCC speaker) 5-10 times yesterday before giving up because anons just kept posting it. Is the board actually that compromised, and is it actually happening for real this time?

[Anonymous No.50841430]

>>50840522
>aug 2022
>those dubs
It's happening soon, isn't it?

[Anonymous No.50841454]

>>50840391
Swift breadcrumbs started in 2016 and we still don't have anything following it

[Anonymous No.50841466]

>>50840520
What is a quadrillion divided by a billion?

[Anonymous No.50841501]

>>50840520
well it fluctuates, but first google result says market cap of US stock market in 2020 was 40 trillion, 10,000x the market cap of currently circulating chainlink, meaning a 1-1 collateralization would need a link price of 90k. Assuming that link would only need to collateralize daily trading volume of 2 trillion-ish would be 500x or link price of 4.5k. Assuming link market cap would only need to be about 10% of daily trading volume due to rapid validation would put link at 450 bucks ( i have no basis for this 10% number, it could be lower or higher). And thats just from collaterilzing the US stock market. If DTCC goes on board we could see the nikkei and others do the same thing with their assets, not to mention collateralizing FOREX.

This doesn't take into other use cases like insurance, reinsurance, payroll, communications, derivatives, or interbank lending and messaging like SWIFT which was the original usecase that got us into this madhouse 5 years ago.

[Anonymous No.50841534]

>>50841308
serious answer: they didn't buy link.

[Anonymous No.50841549]

>>50841466
>>50840520
Oh, actually it appears that the total capitalization of market traded stocks is just about $93 Trillion. So that would make each Chainlink token (Ticker: LINK) traded at roughly $93,000.

And that's just as collateral. Now add value in terms of fee accumulation, supply shock, and speculation.

[Anonymous No.50841569]

>>50840520
Assuming a total market cap of NYSE as 25 trillion
With super linear staking in order to secure $X you need to put a square root of $X as collateral
It means that you would need 5 million $ worth of LINK token staked on nodes
Assuming you could do that with 500000 tokens ( rationale estimate) that gives you 10$ per token

[Anonymous No.50841607]

>>50841501
>>50841569
whoops forgot about super lineal staking

[Anonymous No.50841745]

>>50841569
except your retarded and the whole $25t won't be under 1 don with all nodes.

Its better to split the $25t by the number of shares it represents then adjust for SLS.

Theres roughly 2500 shares on the NYSE.

$25t/2500 = $10b per share roughly

assuming an avg of 10 nodes per DON rn.

10^2 = 100

$10b/100 = $100m in link/ share

250m link tokens/2500 share price feeds = 100k link / share feed don

$100m/100k link = $1000

[Anonymous No.50841746]

>>50841501
>>50841569

however, super linear staking is about the minimum collateralization needed to disincentivize attacks such as being bribed to give a false report. It doesn't take into account how much collateral would be required to make the client whole if bad data or some other non malicious cause resulted in damage to the client. I don't think clients would be comfortable with having their money only collateralized by the square root of their total exposure. They may be willing to undercollateralize it by an amount due to the cryptographic guarantees implicit to the network, but i really doubt that undercollateralization is the square root of their transaction's value.

[Anonymous No.50841787]

>>50840391
I usually don't even bother to comment, but Sergey presented at SIBOS 2016. We've been trying to tell you since 2017... All of it has been obvious since the ICO. The right course of action has been completely obvious since then, we said it back then and some are still trying to drill this into your dense skulls.

[Anonymous No.50841820]

>>50841787
reread his post. He's saying that open and obvious statements by swift regarding chainlink were only public in 2021, he wasn't talking about the clues we followed back then. He probably shouldn't have used the term breadcrumbs since its not a breadcrumb its an announcement.

[Anonymous No.50841828]

>>50840520
Eighty one thousand United States Dollars ($)

[Anonymous No.50841925]

>>50841746
>I don't think clients would be comfortable
There would likely be insurance for the contracts, no? There's already been talk of loss protection for staking in v2.0
https://blog.chain.link/chainlink-staking-roadmap/

[Anonymous No.50842001]

>>50841746
You are right that the super linear value is the minimum. As total value of link staked is what differentiates the top security nodes from eachother for more jobs, nodes are incetivized to have a much greater total stake than the super linear minimum

[Anonymous No.50842061]

>>50841746
>>50842001
Node income is directly proportional to staked value. You should know this, at least try next time

[Anonymous No.50842090]

>>50841925
>There would likely be insurance for the contracts, no?

Why abstract it further? The purpose of the link token has always been to act as collateral.

[Anonymous No.50843000]

>>50839859
This is what some of us were already starting to see back in 2017. Now you understand why this asset has driven so many people insane.

[Anonymous No.50843319]

>>50842090
You clearly haven't been following the v0.1 release. The old model of each node competes and stake its own collateral has been abandoned by the team. They now collectivise the revenue and a common insurance fund is put in place for slashing. It's basically web3 communism I can't believe how happy I am communism is finally going to work and it's all thanks to Chainlink!

[Anonymous No.50843343]

>>50841820
Yes exactly, not fudding at all but remember not all breadcrumbs panned out, look at the stuff with Oracle (the company), roadmap had link integration in 2020, that never happened and then quietly got swept under the rug. That was one of the fudders main ammunition to attempt to downplay the Swift connections, but then Swift came out and publicly gave Sergey a reacharound last year and they gave up saying it wouldn't happen and switched to Swift being a nothingburger.

The DTCC/Project Whitney stuff was being talked about as far back as 2019, but was almost purely speculation at that time, with some tasty crumbs on the side, now its all but confirmed, which is huge.

[Anonymous No.50843377]

>>50842061
Did I imply otherwise? That was my point, nodes will race to increase their total stake to secure more future jobs/fee opportunity

[Anonymous No.50843547]

>>50843343
well it obvious that it would happen. All you have to do is ask yourself: is there a value proposition in X industry that would be served by chainlink validated smartcontracts? And the answer is yes for pretty much everything. Anything of value that requires trust in transaction will eventually be incorporated into web 3.0 and validated by chainlink because the effeciency gains are such that anyone who doesn't won't be able to compete with those that do.

Think about the efficiency gain of DTCC interacting directly with investors via tokenized assets. It cuts out every clearing house and brokerage and all their employees, and wouldn't probably cut their own employee count down to a third or less. We're not just talking about a corporation cutting 10% off their overhead (which in itself would be game changing), we're talking about entire industries becoming redundant.

[Anonymous No.50844243]

thanks for the gaslighting itt frens I cannot sell my link. There is no getting off Mr Sergey's wild ride

[Anonymous No.50844648]

>>50843343
Oracle was not prepared for the challenge nor did they have the vision. Their CEO is busy building luxury resort towns and trying to figure out life extension. Everyone who recognizes and holds chainlink deserves everything that will come to them, it isn't and has not been an easy journey. I wonder how Oracle is feeling about fumbling the bag now that DTCC is presenting at this chainlink conference?

[Anonymous No.50845194]

>>50844648
>I wonder how Oracle is feeling about fumbling the bag now that DTCC is presenting at this chainlink conference?

you just know there are going to be even bigger and better surprise attendees announced as we get closer to the date. This is the big one.

[Anonymous No.50845237]

>>50845194
i hope gravelcoin gets a chance to speak

[Anonymous No.50845281]

>>50845237
gravelcoin x ladyluck x celsius x bancor partnership confirmed

[Anonymous No.50845309]

>pumps the least
>dumps the most
It's happening again kek

[Anonymous No.50845513]

>>50845309
Notice how all the shills just magically disappeared? kek

[Anonymous No.50845651]

>>50845309
Notice how all the shills just magically disappeared? kek

[Anonymous No.50845657]

>>50842090
>why abstract it further
I'm only telling you what has been proposed for v2.0. I don't know the finer details of super-linear staking, but I tried to point you in the direction of the answer to your question; namely that insurance would cover the unlikely event that super linear staking 'failed'. I suggest you read the info on the link i supplied you, instead of asking me.

[Anonymous No.50845690]

>>50845309
Notice how all the shills just magically disappeared? kek

[Anonymous No.50845759]

>>50845690
>>50845651
>>50845309

[Anonymous No.50846026]

>>50845309
Notice how all the shills just magically disappeared? kek

[Anonymous No.50846074]

>>50846026
>>50845690
>>50845651
>>50845513
>>50845759
OH NONONONONONONONO HAHAHA

[Anonymous No.50846111]

>>50840065
>he doesn't remember the paxusd spike to $1k on binance

[Anonymous No.50846158]

>>50845759
Notice how all the shills just magically disappeared? kek

[Anonymous No.50846452]

>>50846111
kek. i remember
https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/bmm75m/my_friend_lost_400000_paying_over_17000_times_the/

[Anonymous No.50846543]

>>50845513
>>50845651
>>50845690
ooops

[Anonymous No.50846655]

>>50846543
Notice how all the shills just magically disappeared? kek

[Anonymous No.50846891]

>>50846543
Notice how the shills just magically disappeared? kek

[Anonymous No.50846971]

>>50846543
Notice how the shills just magically disappeared? kek

[Anonymous No.50846996]

>>50846543
Notice how all the shills just magically disappeared? kek

[Anonymous No.50847244]

>>50846996
>>50846971
>>50845690
>>50845651
>>50845513

[Anonymous No.50847255]

>>50846543
¿Notas cómo todos los cómplices desaparecieron mágicamente? kek

[Anonymous No.50847722]

Negro

[Anonymous No.50847803]

>>50841549
Super linear staking allows the dons to be secured with fraction of the total value secured you dumb nigger newfag

[Anonymous No.50848534]

>>50847803
super linear staking is the minimum amount of money required to make bribes economically unfeasible, not the amount required by the client as collateral. Do you think someone would be willing to entrust a million dollars in transaction value to like 100 bucks of collateral?

[Anonymous No.50848714]

>>50848534
This. Let's say 10 nodes put up $1000 in collateral, that's only $10,000 in total collateral if something goes wrong. Just because you are resistant to bribery up to 10^2 * 1,000 = $100k it doesn't mean that is the optimal amount of collateral to have staked.

[Anonymous No.50850271]

[Anonymous No.50850388]

>>50838864
1400 x 100000 = 140,000,000

[Anonymous No.50850513]

>>50850388
To "eclipse bitcoin" probably means to overtake it's mcap, see my earlier post >>50840534
Assuming, conservatively, that it's 90%, this would put the circulating supply at 100MM tokens, or roughly 5x that of BTC. Hence whatever BTC's price would be by then should be divided by 5. But yeah despite that, at this point 81k+ is in the charts eventually

[Anonymous No.50850935]

The question is how do you sell link when 99% locked up in smart contracts? It’s just like YFI with low supply. Your 1000 linklet stack won’t filled in days

[Anonymous No.50850955]

>>50850935
Liquidity will be very high as tokens are purchased for paying network fees

[Anonymous No.50851114]

>>50839859
>>50840334
>>50840391
>>50840520
>>50843000

[Anonymous No.50851298]

> DTCC set several new volume records in 2020. The company processed $2.3 quadrillion in securities transactions, up nearly 8% over 2019, and on March 12, it hit a new, single-day peak of 363 million U.S. equity transactions — more than two-and-a-half times that of an average processing day

How much fee revenue will Chainlink generate from this? How much will need to collateralize this? How much link will be actively traded per day and used as a currency? Just how much of the world is going to break when an asset is basically infinite to some people? They will literally make a movie about this.

[Anonymous No.50851416]

>>50851298
>Just how much of the world is going to break when an asset is basically infinite to some people?
You don't understand this because you've been steeped in the collective knowledge of this board for so long, but 99% of people will never so much as hear about chainlink. Of the remaining 1%, maybe a tenth of them even have the capacity to understand in general what the token does, and maybe a tenth of those people have the curiosity to give a shit. Don't let the fud get to you. If you can articulate the gist of the first whitepaper, you are among the most elite humans to ever have lived.

[Anonymous No.50851445]

>>50851416
It’s a simple transfer and call function that is built on a decentralized computer. I hope that’s good enough.

[Anonymous No.50851458]

>>50851445
don't forget that it parses tamales

[Anonymous No.50851486]

>>50851458
1:1

[Anonymous No.50851960]

>>50850955
well no, not really. Basically the circulating supply most of the time will be staking rewards paid to nodes. They will sell these rewards to pay operating costs and take profits. But the reality of link tokenomics is that there are two sources of demand for the token. 1 is demand to pay nodes, 1 is demand to stake tokens for rewards. So really there are two markets for chainlink, and these two markets will compete with eachother on exchanges.

[Anonymous No.50852000]

>>50851960
That doesn't prove the other guy wrong. There will still be high liquidity. the real question is who can afford whole link tokens when the price is 1mil+.

[Anonymous No.50852057]

>>50852000
no, there will be high volume, aka high rates of exchange, but only in terms of dollar value. There won't be high liquidity in terms of link tokens because as you correctly stated we'll be buying and selling fractions.

[Anonymous No.50852116]

>>50852057
Yeah. But say if a rich anon decides to sell 100 link, the sell order will eventually get filled due to demand for jobs.

When staking reeeeeeee.

[Anonymous No.50852127]

>>50852057
Basically it will be high liquidity in terms of $$$ value, not so much in tokens as they will be LOCKED IN.

[Anonymous No.50852133]

>>50852116
or demand for staking. There are two markets for link, clients buying it to pay nodes and stakers/nodes buying it for the node reward passive income. There will be a constant pressure by both which will absorb most of the liquidity.

[Anonymous No.50852172]

>>50852133
Eventually leading to $10000000 per link.

[Anonymous No.50852248]

>>50814256
drunk mom fucker here. i fucked your mom right now.

[Anonymous No.50852252]

>>50852172
eh, i don't know about that. its true that we're early, and its true we're going to make a lot of money off of this if everything that should happen does happen. But you can't get into the mindset that this is the end of history. Amazon is on top of the world right now, but a time will come in our lifetime when kids have never heard of it. This is especailly true for chainlink. As cryptography progresses there will be advances and new efficiencies. collateral requirements will drop as the cryptographic assurances become more robust and more well understood. I think we'll have ten years at least at the top, but a time will come when our returns begin to decline and we'll have to move out of it and into something else. Don't forget that.

[Anonymous No.50852392]

>>50852252
>and we'll have to move out of it and into something else. Don't forget that.
I highly doubt anything will be more important than chainlinks key infrastructure in short term. Though maybe after 50 years considering exponential in tech. Even then chainlink may still absorb anything that comes.

[Anonymous No.50852797]

>>50852392
I was in primary school when I first heard about this new, better search engine called "Google".

[Anonymous No.50852817]

>>50852797
Chainlinks monopoly willbe unstoppable

[Anonymous No.50853151]

>>50852817
Indeed it might

[Anonymous No.50853200]

>>50840182
>quit thier job early
Kek literally me. Never been a fudder tho.

[Anonymous No.50853286]

>>50851416
>>50851298
When you realize this one use case alone will make LINK a worthwhile investment you want to go all in. Take in the other use cases like VRF and insurance and it makes you want to sell your house to buy more.

[Anonymous No.50853357]

>>50853286
>you should sell your home for mediocre gains with chainshit
yea this is exactly what I should do you little gaslighter

[Anonymous No.50853614]

>>50839995
>1k until late 2023/24
link peak if even would be short of a 100x from the bottom so around 200-500 in the next few years if everything goes well
we might never see 1k link but to say it stabilizes at 1k link in a year or teo is just pure delusion
i mean look at link now it tries to stabilize at around $5-10
how do you think it would be stable in a two years at a 100x-200x
we will be lucky if we ever see a stable triple digit link

[Anonymous No.50853797]

I'm surprised the mood ITT is still high considering that the Project Whitney breadcrumb turned out to be a false-lead. So did anyone find out what ICE Link is? Looks like ICE relies on Blockstream for oracle services, but I can't find any reference to ICE Link.

[Anonymous No.50854091]

>>50853797
Shills are working overtime

[Anonymous No.50854132]

>>50853357
It's funny to realize that there is literally one anon who posts "gaslighter" multiple times per day in LINK threads. Did you learn this word last week?

[Anonymous No.50854157]

>>50853797
The proof for the false-lead was very disappointing. Can you post the image again? I want to be able to deboonk the DTCC angle Linkies are taking but the fact that Prosperi headed project Whitney and will now be speaking at Smartcon is making me uneasy

[Anonymous No.50854317]

>>50853797
How was it a false lead ?

[Anonymous No.50854337]

>>50853614
Obviously this is all based on smart contract adoption for securities, have you read the thread?

[Anonymous No.50855453]

>>50840143
so a suicide stack for btc is 21 btc? kek yes anon i'm sure people with "only" $500k in btc are about to rope

[Anonymous No.50856449]

>>50854317
Scroll up in this thread. Some anons discovered that ICE Link doesn't seem to actually refer to Link. Then some kind of coping begins afterwards about how the DTCC guy is still going to Smartcon.

[Anonymous No.50856749]

>>50856449
This thread isn't about ICE Link or whatever the fuck, it's about head of project Whitney and DTCC director speaking at Smartcon.

[Anonymous No.50856927]

>>50851298

yeah except DTCC isn't even using Chainlink. Scroll up to Ice Link comments bro. He's just attending the conference.

[Anonymous No.50856968]

>>50856927
>DTCC isn't even using Chainlink
DTCC doesn't have tokenized securities yet.
That's literally what they're looking into

[Anonymous No.50857004]

>>50854132
I've never seen promoting Chainlink as "gaslighting" until like 1-2 days ago, it's so blatant when these fudders (probably just one fudder in this case) get a narrative that they like a sound of and then spam the shit out of it.

[Anonymous No.50857040]

>>50856968
And when they do, Link won't be involved.
"Throughout this process, The DTCC’s Compliance Oracle can be called upon by any ATS or marketplace via API to ensure the trades are compliant (i.e. not breaking lock-up rules, accredited investor verifications, etc.) prior to updating the off-chain registry of stock ownership and cap tables."

https://blog.stomarket.com/the-dtcc-is-streamlining-security-token-secondary-markets-7b26170589a8

[Anonymous No.50857053]

>>50857040
>And when they do, Link won't be involved.
lel says who?

[Anonymous No.50857080]

>>50838864
Yes. Literally just hodl it and don't spend a token till it flips the BTC in value.

[Anonymous No.50857173]

Prosperi returns from Smartcon back to DTCC offices:

>Boss: There he is, Steve-ooo!!! Our little wolf of blockchain
>Prosperi: I've got some great new developments in the space to ta..
>Boss: That's great buddy (checks watch), but I gotta run to a meeting. Say, now that you're in back in the office, could you make a coffee run for us? Thanks big guy

[Anonymous No.50858020]

>>50857173
>this rally will fail like all the rest

[Anonymous No.50858803]

>>50857173
Lmao. Linkies BTFO

[Anonymous No.50860295]

>>50812479
>they hold all the stock certificates
No they don't own my GME shares. For good reason

[Anonymous No.50860389]

>>50824337
>was it dtcc that instructed to halt the buying of gamestop?
GameStop was halted by Apex Clearing Corp.
GameStop their stock split per dividend was REJECTED by the DTCC - instead, no shares were distributed and a forward general stock split was issued.

This means, that the DTCC stole about 180 million shares from retail investors, funds and ETFs. This accounts to about a $7.2B robbery at current prices. However, the shares will need to be bought once they are transferred to CS. Eventually, the DTCC will be margin called by the FED.

[Anonymous No.50860451]

>>50860389
>Eventually, the DTCC will be margin called by the FED.
Wtf is this schizo nonsense. This is on par with "the US government will have to pay out lavishly for your Iraqi dinars."

[Anonymous No.50862759]

>>50812874
>Hedera Hashgraph

[Anonymous No.50863216]

>>50857004
After five years of listening to Chainlink community engineering I am starting to believe the promotion of Chainlink is gaslighting. Why does it only happen here?

[Anonymous No.50863224]

>>50857053
says the discord retard script hes reading lmao. DTCC attending smartcon is literally the most bullish thing thats happened to chainlink ever. Theres no way to spin it other than for them to deny reality and say "nuh-uh".

[Anonymous No.50863256]

>>50860295
>No they don't own my GME shares. For good reason

imagine being a GME cultist and still not understanding what the dtcc is. they own all the shares anon. What you own is an IOU.

[Anonymous No.50863403]

>>50857173
say hi to everyone in discord for me!

[Anonymous No.50863712]

>>50863403
hey this isnt discord tranny

[Anonymous No.50863802]

>>50863224
Remember when link “partnered” with oracle

[Anonymous No.50863955]

>>50863802
Yes and as I mentioned in this post
>>50843343
it was a common fud point for discord trannies, then when swift became all but official they had to try to fud any connection to swift itself instead. Same deal with arbitrum, claim they aren't using link until its all but official, then fud arbitrum itself, now with DTCC same deal, they'll say its just a smokescreen until its obvious its happening and then they'll say DTCC doesn't matter. All because they have Kevin Chang syndrome.

[Anonymous No.50864082]

>>50863955
to be honest the project whitney stuff is new to me. this is the first thread i've heard of it. I just know what the DTCC is and its obvious they'd want to tokenize their assets and its obvious that they'll need chainlink oracles to validate the massive amount of capital transactions such a tokenization effort would result in.

[Anonymous No.50864195]

>>50864082
The breadcrumbs date back to 2019 or 2020, I remember seeing them on here before, the problem is whenever really good breadcrumbs pop up the jannies start censoring them and deleting the threads, pretty sure the jannies and discord work together. They also hid all the avax threads pre ico to keep anons from getting in on that, saw someone mention it like 2 weeks before the ico but too late to get in on it. Just a bunch of trannies who care more about pulling the ladder up than discussing anything, probably out of their own frustration at not having made it yet.

[Anonymous No.50864228]

>>50864195
also keep in mind this thread itself got deleted like 6 times yesterday back to back before they gave up and left this one up, then they proceeded to delete all link threads for a few hours until the pump stopped.

[Anonymous No.50864540]

>>50864195
>pretty sure the jannies and discord work together.
why else would they do it for free? Jannies are attracted to parasocial relationships to give their shut-in lives meaning. Its the same on every board, and really everyone who acts as a moderator anywhere has the same psych profile.
>>50864228
I have no proof, but i'm pretty sure they don't own any link and the creeping realization that they're priced out of meaningful stacks is crushing them. Someone who thinks they're better than you can't take your advice without psychological conflict.

[Anonymous No.50864566]

>>50864540
> but i'm pretty sure they don't own any link
Nah most jannies own at least 10k+ stacks, but they are in bed with NEXO and Bulgarians.

[Anonymous No.50864710]

>>50864566
maybe at one point, but remember how they kept pruning the celsius and bancor threads?

[Anonymous No.50866708]

bumperino