/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.50803133]

PoW is dead.

[Anonymous No.50803174]

>>50803133
Checked, it is official token and oracle not needed.

[Anonymous No.50803197]

>>50803133
>>50803133
checked
this merge is gonna blow heads

[Anonymous No.50803203]

>>50803133
sergey bent the knee again

[Anonymous No.50803215]

>>50803133
holy fuckeroo what a FLEX

[Anonymous No.50803236]

>>50803133
Phew, lucky Token isn't needed!

[Anonymous No.50803246]

>>50803133
Kingmade becomes kingmaker

[Anonymous No.50803248]

>>50803133
lol
lmao
I hate these centralized shitchains so much it's unreal

[Anonymous No.50803255]

>>50803203
No. This is the minor toll LINK must pay Vitamin Butane to have him push for EIP 4488 and giving oracles cheap gas for ETH txs. Plus it appeases the ESG fag investors. Bullish as fuck.

[Anonymous No.50803408]

>>50803255
Link has basically been subsidizing development of decentralized infrastructure and a market for its services because eth spaghetti code has absurd gas fees and can’t scale. It makes perfect sense to withdraw those subsidies the second there is another option. Plus esg money.

[Anonymous No.50803410]

PoW tokens not needed

[Anonymous No.50803440]

>>50803255
another heckin btb reader

[Anonymous No.50803581]

>Chainlink is decentralized and open source!
>actually, you cant use our product.
I can't believe people are supporting this piece of shit.

[Anonymous No.50803701]

>>50803255
>The absolute state of mETH

[Anonymous No.50803715]

>>50803408
This

[Anonymous No.50803776]

>inb4 somebody forks Chainlink and begins competing with them

[Anonymous No.50803976]

this is crypto cartel on full retard

[Anonymous No.50804271]

>>50803255
I wouldn’t even say it’s a toll. ETH pow chain post merge is a joke. You don’t fork chain state and expect all the services to keep running. It’s absurd.

[Anonymous No.50806259]

>>50803133
Hang on what happened to "blockchain agnostic"? Or does that just mean that Sergey picks and chooses what blockchains are served?

[Anonymous No.50806344]

>>50806259
See my post right above yours.
Eth pow is not a legitimate fork. It’s a scam by miners.

[Anonymous No.50806404]

>>50806259
>that moment stinky linkies become self aware

[Anonymous No.50806418]

>>50806259
https://twitter.com/hasufl/status/1555902237548896256?s=21&t=iAA2EnlBMiol9s0__5_yrw

[Anonymous No.50806495]

This is such a complete nothingburger but it’s funny to see discord trooners and bulgars try to invent some way to fud it

[Anonymous No.50806508]

>>50806404
If anything this may bullish for Chainlink because they’re signaling they’re in lockstep with the ethereum foundation

[Anonymous No.50806523]

>>50806344
Are you sure you can tell the difference between a blockchain and a SQL database pretending to be a blockchain? ETH has not been a real blockchain since the DAO hack

[Anonymous No.50806525]

>>50806259
You can use chainlink oracles to create your own feeds on eth pow. They just won't be subsidized by Sergey.

[Anonymous No.50806555]

>>50806508
Yeah but no one from the ETH Foundation are going to Smartcon. Optimism looks to be boycotting as well.

[Anonymous No.50806583]

why the fuck do people think that the merge will solve gas fees?
gas fees will not be affected

yall better keep buying MATIC before the prices go ballistic

[Anonymous No.50806588]

>>50803133
Who asked?
Chainlink is needed so the PoW chain would thrive regardless

[Anonymous No.50806674]

>>50803133
shorted 50k with 20x

[Anonymous No.50806757]

>we are blockchain agnos-ACK!

[Anonymous No.50806803]

>>50806525
this

[Anonymous No.50806875]

>>50806555
Chceked. They are sending an envoy though. Chainlink is too big to completely ignore. They are still pissing and shitting and trying, but it's inevitable.

[Anonymous No.50806966]

>>50806875
It's really weird that some like ENS that worked closely with Chainlink to implement CCIP read not even showing up to SmartCon. what the actual fuck

[Anonymous No.50807011]

>>50803203
Chainlink was always pro PoS, Ari had a whole speech before the senate or something on how it's superior and ecological

[Anonymous No.50807020]

>>50803701
Gupta is not with consensys or even working on any blockchain tech anymore.

[Anonymous No.50807030]

>>50803133
>credibly neutral

[Anonymous No.50807073]

>>50806966
They haven’t announced everyone yet

[Anonymous No.50807090]

>>50806875
emin from avax not on the list and the bancor and celsius guys are absent as well. who can say why?

[Anonymous No.50807114]

>>50807073
i was going but emin is not listed and I am big supporter of avax so now I am not going. Sucks too because I wanted to save 777 off the price of my ticket

[Anonymous No.50807135]

>>50803203
who's the little hottie?

[Anonymous No.50807154]

>>50807090
I think we can all understand why Celsius and bancor wouldn’t be invited. I think emin will probably be added.

[Anonymous No.50807156]

no charles of ADA either and ADA has a bigger marketcap than SOL. This means that Sol is not as important a blockchain as ADA. Plus ADA is number 7 right now in rank and Chainlink love 7. Charles draws in the hyper intelligent crowd that think beyond just releasing a product too

[Anonymous No.50807178]

>>50807090
The Bancor and Celsius guys are persona non grata, so that shouldn't come as a surprise. Chainlink backed them and they fucked up, now Chainlink has to drop them and hope the space forgives them for backing them. No idea about AVAX though. I thought AVAX and CL were pretty close.

[Anonymous No.50807194]

>>50807154
Couldnt understand why a little case of bankruptcy should ruin a good working relationship. Bancor are serious about impermanent loss protection too they would never let the community down. A good show of strength and solidarity with the community would alleviate some fears I think

[Anonymous No.50807221]

>>50807194
I think Sergey is trying to not get murdered by a community member. It would be a bad look to further endorse a project that fucked over many holders at this moment in time.

[Anonymous No.50807231]

>>50803255
>This is the minor toll LINK must pay
lol? chainlink runs eth. eth would die without it

[Anonymous No.50807234]

>>50807178
I see integrations on fantom, avax, bnb, polygon but no one from these projects seems to be going to smartcon

[Anonymous No.50807254]

>>50807221
what? which community member is trying to murder poor sergey? everyone loves him! he's the jolly oracle fatman, like a crypto santa

[Anonymous No.50807269]

So what competing oracles can run the PoW ETH chain’s smart contracts once chainlink is gone? Surely some competing oracle company will step up or will the PoW ETH just become a dead chain like ETC?

[Anonymous No.50807278]

>>50807254
Dude sentiment is pretty damn bad across the board. Tons of people got wrecked by Celsius and bancor plus the price has been garbage.

[Anonymous No.50807279]

>>50807234
Maybe they are going but are not invited as speakers? I don't know how many slots there are for speakers.

[Anonymous No.50807295]

>>50807269
twap from uniswap for all onchain data. they are still figuring out the offchain part but the funny thing is chainlink have years of experience and you know what happens in crypto when some project has a strong leg up in experience and tech

[Anonymous No.50807297]

>>50807269
Doubt it

[Anonymous No.50807329]

>>50803133

But what does this mean for dog coins?

[Anonymous No.50807355]

>>50807278
bancor and celsius just caught some of that bad economic meta I have been hearing about. After the bankruptcy court squares everything it will be back to business as usual for the celsius boys. do you know they have someone from nasa working for them?
>>50807279
that's crazy why would several layer ones show up and have nothing to say?

I don't think anyone is out to murder anyone haha it's just money after all fake numbers on a screen

[Anonymous No.50807384]

>>50807355
Celsius was a fucking scam bro. He straight up lied to people over and over about how they wouldn’t lose access to their money and Sergey endorsed them. It’s a terrible look. And no, it isn’t just numbers on a screen. Ignorant people lost real money.

[Anonymous No.50807489]

>>50807384
real money come on bro its all just fake numbers going up and down no one takes this shit seriously. I highly doubt someone from a serious institution like nasa would work for a scam so celsius was probably just a little bit of a scam, enough to find them in bankruptcy court at any rate.
bancor is a great service by the way very convenient. you just deposit and go about your life.

I hope they add more people. would be a shame if no one showed up. I think Charles from ADA would be a great addition. He could wear a big hat with rory. I would repost the big hat pic

[Anonymous No.50807531]

>>50807489
Wtf are you talking about dude. This shit has already made me a millionaire. You might be playing some casual game but some of us are fighting for our lives and our futures.

[Anonymous No.50807534]

>>50807489
>a serious institution like nasa

Anon, I...

[Anonymous No.50807552]

imagine if charles brought a bit of the farm to smartcon god that would be good. you could talk chainlink and ada while feeding chickens and riding a horse. Wearing a big hat could be the gimmicky attraction that captures the attention of all of New York

[Anonymous No.50807571]

>>50803581
The Chainlink network is decentralized and open source, it's just that the specific contract owned by Chainlink will move to PoS ETH.
If you want to use the open source Chainlink code to run feeds on PoW ETH, you can do that.

[Anonymous No.50807581]

>>50807531
millionaires dont fight for survival lmao wtf are YOU talking about, pal?>>50807534
space exploration is a real and noble pursuit. you should be smarter than you could go to space too

[Anonymous No.50807584]

>>50807552
Tell me more about the New York ranch, anon...

[Anonymous No.50807617]

>>50806259
>>50806757
see >>50806525
and >>50807571

[Anonymous No.50807679]

>>50807584
What we really need to see or what i wanna see is Steve Ellis bring calm to the community with an inspirational speech to usher in chainlink tokenomics 2.0

[Anonymous No.50807733]

>>50806525
But aren't the oracles still centrally managed by Sergey, as-in he handpicks who becomes an oracle? Meaning the code enforces centralization and someone has a master key that controls the system?

[Anonymous No.50807762]

>>50807584
Charles riding topless on a horse like Putin is one thing but Steve Ellis with massive gelled hair extensions to make him look taller talking oracles at the dawn of a new era right next to sergey would be inspirational, something to light our darkest hour

[Anonymous No.50807784]

>>50803203
You fucking retards memed Sergey being a paypig into reality. Nice one ya fucking chumps

[Anonymous No.50807800]

>>50807090
Emin takes off the summer to go back to turkey for vacation

[Anonymous No.50807810]

if chainlink want to make memes reality for community respect they should set up a booth where you try and dodge thomas hodge except you cant because you cant hodge the dodge

[Anonymous No.50807821]

>>50807733
>But aren't the oracles still centrally managed by Sergey, as-in he handpicks who becomes an oracle?
No, only Chainlink's own contracts.

You can use the open-source Chainlink code to make your own custom DONs, but they'll be very basic compared to Chainlink's contracts since a lot of tech isn't yet released as open source yet.

[Anonymous No.50807841]

>>50807800
your telling me emin cant send one tiktok video congratulating chainlink and avax on their mutual success from Istanbul?

what sort of third world shithole is turkey any way?

[Anonymous No.50807879]

>>50807581
You’re gonna need more than a million to make it into the citadel.

[Anonymous No.50807882]

>unfunny spammer shits up chainlink thread
many such cases

[Anonymous No.50807890]

>>50803133
everything is open source. Someone will just write another oracle solution

[Anonymous No.50807908]

>>50807882
I hate that I can recognize every single poster by their writing styles now, this is the unfunny Ed Felten tokenless future spammer.

[Anonymous No.50807917]

>>50807890
As a matter of fact, Jason Parser from Shadowfork already did that. Linkies are on borrowed time really.

[Anonymous No.50807918]

>>50807882
quiet sure thats happening in the other chainlink thread not here fren

[Anonymous No.50807944]

>>50807908
>t. discord tranny seething
I can tell you work for something in an official capacity

[Anonymous No.50808007]

>>50807917
Tom L Parser handles Shadowfork now

[Anonymous No.50808024]

>>50807908
>this is the unfunny Ed Felten tokenless future spammer.
source?

[Anonymous No.50808052]

>>50807944
checked and no but interesting you responded right away, feeling called out? >>50808024
I don't have any caps saved but this nigger spent like 3 months around arbitrum's release last year trying to force some unfunny meme about ed felten and a tokenless future. he's actually not fudding link just a broken long term holder, like most on this board.

[Anonymous No.50808086]

>>50808052
called out for what?
>this nigger spent like 3 months around arbitrum's release last year trying to force some unfunny meme about ed felten and a tokenless future
I literally joined this website yesterday, nigger. Who is Ed Felten?

[Anonymous No.50808140]

>>50808052
>no source
>he's actually not fudding link just a broken long term holder, like most on this board.
source?

[Anonymous No.50808205]

>>50808086
>I literally joined this website yesterday, nigger. Who is Ed Felten?
They are not sending their best, folks

[Anonymous No.50808273]

>>50808205
is Ed Felten their best? Who will send him?

Will Sergey send Ed Felten to save me?

[Anonymous No.50808333]

>>50808273
You know too much about Chainlink lore. What is your objective here? Just derailing?

[Anonymous No.50808335]

>>50808205
>They are not sending their best, folks
source?

[Anonymous No.50808367]

>>50808335
There some really weird posters in LINK threads today. Are you the "are you currently fudding LINK in this post" anon in the other thread?

[Anonymous No.50808419]

>>50808333
checked.
I dont know half the projects that use Chainlink. Look at the Smartcon line up do you know all those people?

If Ed Felten wants a "tokenless future" like the nigger here said >>50808052 then he is an enemy to token lovers around our crater earth. I love tokens.

>you need to have a purpose on a shit+piss forum
I just think ADA as the seventh crypto project by popularity should be featured at Smartcon. Allergy Chainlink like sevens probably because crypto is about gambling and many problem gamblers feel that seven is a lucky number. you ask any recovering investor from las vegas and they will tell you to go all in on flannel seven

[Anonymous No.50808443]

>>50808419
So legitimate schizo? Or just weird?

[Anonymous No.50808477]

>>50803133
They haven't realised it yet but if no adequate competition to link emerges then link will be the de-facto kingmaker and gatekeeper for eth's future development. As the ecosystem becomes ever more established and reliant on link then the fork link supports will be the one that survives, regardless of what the ethereum dao votes for. In taking a specific position to not support the PoW fork link may seem to be acting in eth's interests; but they're overlooking the fact that a specific decision made by a non eth entity is having existential consequences for an eth fork. This is not something eth can control and yet its fundamental to their success, and link grows more ubiquitous and fundamentally woven into the fabric of ethereum's network every day.

Let them crow that link has bent the knee, it only highlights the depth of their ignorance to the magnitude of link's ongoing takeover

[Anonymous No.50808483]

So is LINK going to go the way of LUNA? Will we have arguments between LINK Classic shills and LINK2 shills?

[Anonymous No.50808498]

>>50808483
Sorry anon, if this is your takeaway from OP you're ngmi.

[Anonymous No.50808508]

ETC is going to be the dominant chain once all the miners move after the merge. Sergey is making a big macsteak

[Anonymous No.50808531]

i'm only buying bitcoin fuck all this

[Anonymous No.50808533]

>>50808443
>why are there weird people on the internet
maybe this is not the place for you...

[Anonymous No.50808573]

>>50808367
>There some really weird posters in LINK threads today.
source?

[Anonymous No.50808588]

>>50808086
Kill yourself nigger faggot newfag

[Anonymous No.50808603]

>>50808086
Go back

[Anonymous No.50808631]

>>50808483
There are literally 0 people in the world that are going to side with a "LINK classic" on the PoW Ethereum chain. It's dead on arrival, dude, it's worthless without Chainlink oracles.

[Anonymous No.50808638]

>>50808588
>>50808603
Newfag here. Go where?

[Anonymous No.50808680]

>>50808631
I would exclusively use pow eth with the chainlink fork just to piss you off

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.50808705]

>>50808680
I hope you build your own Chainlink fork including all of the DONs and infrastructure required on the PoW fork, I think it would be a valuable learning experiencing for you. And after gaining that experience maybe you could actually try making money by doing the same thing on the PoS fork which is where all the value will be.

[Anonymous No.50808826]

>>50808705
I dont want to brag but that sounds like a very simple weekend project. And I have all of the weekdays to make backroom deals with exclusive data providers and defi solutions.

[Anonymous No.50809086]

>>50808826
You need a 2 man team

[Anonymous No.50809143]

>>50803133
CHAINLINK SUPPORTS TORNADO.CASH
BAN CHAINLINK

[Anonymous No.50809206]

>>50803133
legit hilarious how NO ONE is understanding the implication of this, ive only seen a few twitter heads realizing it but not even the big influencoors and vc shills, and there are still zero eth foundation members attending smartcon, despite this move being the single biggest support they've received

i perceive this as a MAJOR sign of good faith from sirgay towards vitalik and co, basically a strategic move so vb will have owe chainlink a solid post dank sharting and endorse them as main builders

genuinely astounding how fucking braindead this community still is for the most part, even the supposed intelligent ones

[Anonymous No.50809225]

>>50803255
bingo this nigger gets it, i hope a few more do as well

[Anonymous No.50809296]

>>50806875
very nice, added today, was one of the missing pieces for smartcon

>>50806966
>>50807090
more getting announced / not everyone's in NYC

[Anonymous No.50809514]

>>50803133
in english, doc

[Anonymous No.50809977]

>>50807581
>these are the people shilling LINK and it's partner scams now
I leave /biz/ for a month and this jeet shit has only gotten more sophisticated and gay

[Anonymous No.50810138]

>>50803133
Based. I might actually start investing in LINK . BTC is the only PoW worth anything

[Anonymous No.50810149]

>>50803174
Nice,,,,,,,so like you can use it to link it to the post merge ethereum chain?
It doesn't link to anything but a single chain

Chainlink will go down in history as a bigger scam than BTC

[Anonymous No.50810164]

Remember when you guys used to brag about vitalik bending the knee to serg? Quite the narrative shift. And then you missed the entire bullrun and are too cucked to defy the very people fucking you. Pussies. Two more weeks

[Anonymous No.50810377]

>>50806583
>yall
kys

[Anonymous No.50810401]

>>50810164
knee status = bent
>>50809977
nice digits but you cannot into irony faggot

[Anonymous No.50810577]

>watching Linkies get BTFO again, in slow motion

[Anonymous No.50810688]

>>50803203

The body language says it all

>Vitalik identical to the petite woman in front of him
>Sirgay hunched over like an Ogre, gut bursting the seams of his shirt

THIS is who I've put all my savings into? Fuck me.

[Anonymous No.50810747]

>>50810688
>the petite woman
That woman's name is Dawn Song, remember it.

[Anonymous No.50810915]

>>50810747
>>50810688
>woman

[Anonymous No.50810932]

>>50810915

[Anonymous No.50811358]

>>50807135
If you don't know you're not going to make it

[Anonymous No.50811549]

>>50807571
hello Chainlink Labs employee!

[Anonymous No.50811830]

>>50810747
In reality what is actually happening here is Vitalik is asocial/beta and is copying the physical mannerism of the woman he is attracted too. You don't want to do that but he doesn't know any better

[Anonymous No.50812338]

>>50807355
Absolutely delusional kek. Bancor and Celsius is done.

[Anonymous No.50812377]

>>50811830
you don't know who's mirroring who. that looks like a stance vitalik would take on his own.

[Anonymous No.50812384]

>>50808477
>they haven’t realized it yet
The ethereum foundation has 100% realized it

[Anonymous No.50812408]

>>50808477
>>50809206
It’s some pretty crazy shit. I can’t help but see Schmidt’s influence here. Quietly building, quietly dominating the entire space. Chainlink is in its “don’t be evil” phase right now, and, for better or for worse, at some point they’ll probably transition to their “do the right thing” phase. Whatever happens it’s going to be pretty interesting to see how this all plays out.

[Anonymous No.50812457]

>>50809206
>i perceive this as a MAJOR sign of good faith from sirgay towards vitalik and co, basically a strategic move so vb will have owe chainlink a solid post dank sharting and endorse them as main builders
imagine believing Vitalik the pedo skelly would do anyone a (((solid))) for any reason whatsoever. No one from ETH will endorse chainlink and none of them will attend SmartCon.

Their faith is misplaced and fucking stupid given everything the ETH team have done against LINK

[Anonymous No.50812472]

>>50812457
one nerd from the foundation was added to
vb mentioned link in a reddit post when asked about how builders could be decentralized

[Anonymous No.50812614]

>>50812472
>one literal who nerd
>a pass mention on reddit for something as significant as block building
wut

[Anonymous No.50813228]

>>50803197
Yeah fren. The merge is something to look forward to desu. My best innovation on the blockchain so far is privacy protocols like Railgun which enable privacy on assets and transactions.

[Anonymous No.50813267]

>>50809206
it would make zero sense for chainlink to support eth pow, it really doesn't signal anything
the fact that they're the one project that needs to put out a statement like that shows just how dependent the space is on them though

[Anonymous No.50814580]

>>50803133
USDC and USDT both support the main PoS branch. LINK is merely following them.

[Anonymous No.50815565]

>>50803133
holy fuck chainlink sucks

[Anonymous No.50815583]

>>50803174
Oracle's don't even exist and it's embarrassing "people" have fallen for a renaming of HTTP calls

[Anonymous No.50817535]

>>50803133
i don't think so, op. I got my eyes set on mnftm, which is an augmented nft market place aiming to tackle under representation and under compensation of black creators in web3 space.

[Anonymous No.50817564]

>>50817535
Does this imply they're giving ethnically diverse creators all around the world a platform and all the tools they need to showcase their talent and generate wealth?

[Anonymous No.50817594]

>>50803133
Proof of steak vs Proof of randomness
>Steak is haram. I choose randomness.

[Anonymous No.50817640]

>>50803133
POW has a bottleneck, and I believe this is why GEEQ is employing the POH protocol, which is quicker and more effective. I think this will help the project grow.

[Anonymous No.50817663]

>>50817594
Then there's the big boss of them all, proof of honesty. You gotta be honest or it beats it out you kek

[Anonymous No.50817681]

>>50817594
You need to conduct research on POH, the idea is to transformed blockchain experience by POH protocol and eliminate high transaction fees.

[Anonymous No.50817684]

>>50817640
A million consensus algorithms so far. Why not just pick one that is both secure and less energy consuming and standardize. Sick of seeing new ones every fucking day

[Anonymous No.50817814]

>>50803174
POR is the king jeet

[Anonymous No.50817851]

>>50807917
Its over if Jason really is running Shadowfork

[Anonymous No.50817936]

>>50811358
Is this dawn?

[Anonymous No.50817966]

Disregard PoW. Aquire MATIC.

[Anonymous No.50818132]

>>50817684
Old pajeet, POH is secure and less energy consuming and aims to eliminate high transaction fees.

[Anonymous No.50818153]

>>50817814
No anon, I think is POH consensus technique, and yes, I discovered additional aspects to think about.

[Anonymous No.50818389]

>>50818132
Everyone just keeps talking about the same thing and it's so annoying! Wtf is that? Just fucking get a Blockchain project and hold. Not like any of you jeets care about tech

[Anonymous No.50818438]

>>50818153
Y'all just spurt out a ton of random terms like you know what you're saying. Whereas they're all just vapor. Show me where it has been applied successfully.

[Anonymous No.50818538]

>>50818153
PoR combines the best of PoS and PoW to give a better and ecofriendly blockchain. That's by far is the best

[Anonymous No.50819391]

>29 posts by this ID

[Anonymous No.50820464]

>>50803133
>no proof of work
Doesn't this mean that it's just a centralize shitcoin being dictated instead of transacted?

>t. Read a paper on crypto 6 years ago

[Anonymous No.50821578]

>>50817814
Yeah. Enabling validators use mobile phones or raspberry pi to validate nodes, that's a kingly move jeet

[Anonymous No.50823350]

>>50803133
kind of shitty

[Anonymous No.50826218]

>>50807810
Kek

Maybe a horse booth too for ol jonny to give a live demonstration

[Anonymous No.50826453]

>>50803133
chainlink is so dumb for this

[Anonymous No.50826541]

>>50803133
does this affect kadena?

[Anonymous No.50826561]

>>50803133
Dies this mean i can afford a gpu and play my heckin vidya games now?!

[Anonymous No.50826564]

>>50803133
I'm looking forward to a fork so I can dump my ETHPoW for real ETH immediately.

[Anonymous No.50826847]

>>50818389
Oh c'mon chad. The tech matters just as much, else people won't be able to tell the value of what they're holding. Right now a lot of platforms are going multichain and my attention is on privacy solutions in that sector being a welcomed innovation in the crypto ecosystem.

[Anonymous No.50827337]

>>50803133
yeah guys let's just leave all the governance to the whales
what could go wrong?

[Anonymous No.50827636]

>>50826541
No

[Anonymous No.50827700]

>>50809206
you dont get it. this isn't cl doing eth a solid. cl OWNS the eth network.

[Anonymous No.50828012]

Can any anon elucidate the relationship between Chainlink DONs, CCIP and Bitcoin, which is absolutely the longest chain and only true solution to the Byzantine Generals problem. Aside from both BTC and LINK being architected by Sergey (SN=SN), how do the two fit within the broader protocol stack of the new universal monetary system we are witnessing evolve in real time. Thank you in advance for your answers

[Anonymous No.50828081]

>>50828012
>Satoshi
>supporting POS
Lmao. Pure delusion.

[Anonymous No.50828356]

>>50828012
My takeaway is that my only hope is to try to ride on the coattails of Sergey