Darksharding becoming new buzzword. Yet few realize it's CL *EATING* miners/MEV lunch. Hilarious

[Anonymous No.50759626]

>EIP-4844 proposal - by Vitalik Buterin - aka Proto-Danksharding introduces a new kind of ethereum transaction type

https://www.eip4844.com

>Post-merge: A new specialized class, called block builders, bid on the right to choose the (tx list) contents ... and proposer (formerly, miners) need only select the (builder) with highest bid. Only builder can process the entire block (and even there, possible to use third-party decentralized oracle protocols to implement a distributed block builder); other validators and users can verify the blocks.

https://notes.ethereum.org/@vbuterin/proto_danksharding_faq#What-is-Danksharding

>Post-Merge: Miners reduced to "proposers"; authority limited to choosing highest bidder block builders. With danksharding, no one aware of builders tx list. Once builder has been selected to manage a slot, it is their responsibility to process the entire block ... oracles to act as block builders ... primary motivation for design, according to the Eth team, to limit MEV, unfair controls that miners now have

https://news.coincu.com/113352-what-is-blockchain-danksharding/

>EIP-4844 will be part of The Surge upgrade ... could be implemented as soon as Shanghai hard fork, the first post-merge upgrade

https://ethdaily.substack.com/p/the-merge-surge-verge-purge-splurge

>Kain: L222 finally has some momentum ... with EIP-4844 done in reasonable timeframe we’ll be able to obliterate ... transaction costs.

https://mirror.xyz/kain.eth/wstTdM5tz1LqdupcKwBCJBJ-tHNtP-CAITf-ewJqRd0

>FSS ... an oracle network order the txs sent to a contract ... decouples ability to extract MEV from mining blocks

https://blog.chain.link/chainlink-fair-sequencing-services-enabling-a-provably-fair-defi-ecosystem

>VB: if you want, I imagine even Chainlink could do this

https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/rwojtk/ama_we_are_the_efs_research_team_pt_7_07_january/

>arb nitro, merge + smartcon calendar, "tx lanes"?, why vb proposed maker oracles
u get it yet?

[Anonymous No.50759674]

>>50759626
What in the FUCK are you even trying to say?

[Anonymous No.50759704]

why is it called dank? is this a drug use reference? i am very offended

[Anonymous No.50759733]

>>50759626
Tfw hold ETH and LINK

[Anonymous No.50759757]

i dankshardded my pants

[Anonymous No.50759765]

>>50759704
They expect you to believe a man named Dankrad Feist invented it.

[Anonymous No.50759771]

I'm in this narrative too. That danksharding institutes proposer-builder separation and that the block builders could be Chainlink nodes running FSS.
But at the same time I have such chronic hopium fatigue that I'm not going to expect anything until I literally see confirmation that Chainlink nodes are building ETH blocks at scale.

[Anonymous No.50759797]

it's absolutely massive
a complete takeover
it's a complete vampire attack on the entire eth network
essentially, all the eth blocks will be controlled by chainlink nodes
and NO ONE is talking this, which is just one small layer of what chainlink is building towards
with ffs also controlling L2 rollups, with CCIP controlling the cross chain bridges, all the price feeds controlling all of defi on all chains, without even going into keepers, deco, vrf, etc or the enterprise layer
it's mind blowing even you're already link pilled
NO ONE knows but it's all written down
it's why vb desperately tried to push maker towards oracles a year ago
he knew, but has to reluctantly go along with it
maker was the same vcs behind the MEV mafia
the same mafia was also being optimism initially, when arb got ignored
vb initially ignored arb but at some point had to admit it was the way and endorsed it
arb is now the de facto L2 while op is ran by amateurs
arb controls eth rollups and scaling, esp. with nitro coming there won't even be competition
arb is where ffs r&d started, which is phase 1 of danksharding moving to oracles as block builders on mainnet
the miners cartel and the MEV mafia will be annihilated and replaced
they will be forced to bend the knee and either join chainlink as nodes if they want juicy fees from running eth
your milkshake? I drink it up
the con calendar should be your first hint
the second hint is when sirgay mentioned the growth program and how L1s would be building dedicated tx lanes for them
it's going to be a thing for rollups AND for oracles, onchain priority for ESSENTIAL services. nothing more essential than CL.ENTRANCHED everywhere.
OP just awarded $millions to CL to subsidize their nodes btw, first step of PGP many more to come
ceos of solana, ftm and other shitchains attending smartcon NYC, with SBF presiding. two words: KING. MADE
if u dont get it by now, feeling rly sorry for you bulgarians. i spoonfeeded as much as possible, rest is up to your IQ.

[Anonymous No.50759811]

>>50759704
because ethereum is a joke of a network run by a bunch of immature pedo communist freaks. it's fucking embarrassing.

[Anonymous No.50759825]

>>50759757
>wearing pants

[Anonymous No.50759876]

>>50759797
>dumps
lmao tnn

[Anonymous No.50759977]

There’s something to this but I’m pretty sure pbs is being proposed for updates that come after the upcoming Merge. In other words, two more weeks (years).

[Anonymous No.50759984]

>>50759797
>-1.85%

[Anonymous No.50759988]

a few weeks ago an xrp schizo posted in a link thread about how much better xrp has performed than link. I pointed out to him that xrp is at like 30 cents right now and that it was the same price it is today 5 years ago, meaning no growth in 5 years. He then called me a retard for not understanding market cap.

I don't get it. One of the earliest fuds about link was that since there are a billion tokens it could never achieve a high token price because its market cap would have to be in the trillions to go above 1k. But somehow for xrp thats bullish? Are they all just insane or is there some airdrop mechanism in xrp where everytime they print more every holder gets some tokens?

[Anonymous No.50760009]

>>50759704
Dank means weed, and shatter is when they take weed and extract the thc into a tray that hardens and shatters into shards like meth. So a dankshard would be a small piece of this ultra high potency extract.

Probably, whoever came up with the name was taking dabs

[Anonymous No.50760027]

>>50759797
last word: id go a step further in schizo mode
why blackrock now integrating cb into aladin?
eth2=ESG friendly
see the ESG larp anon
larpy or schizo, or grain of truth? maybe both
POS=ESG will open the floodates again, there wont be cockblocking like last time this time
cb=instituional access to eth staking...... AND eventually link staking
LARRY FINK does NOT fuck around, yet it has now been Chosen into aladdin.
aladdin, you either get it or you don't, the scale of it? yeah it's not justin sun chinks with crossed arms and 3AC amateurs with daddy lunch money anymore
they flushed out that poor cathy in such a brutal way, that chart holy shit, KEK, consider that a warning shot for what's coming next. It's a Man's world and it's the tribe's
never forget cb listing chainlink in new york is what drove the early link pump, they've been deep together since day 1
never forget the implication of sbf president over smartcon and the now battle between cb and ftx as the de facto institutional exchange, both backed by blackr*ck in different ways
why pyth, the BIGGEST market maker in crypto today and allies to sbf mafia, are pushing hard for their price feeds and ccip ripoffs on solana and now x chain? the biggest players SEE the value of what CL labs is doing and struggling to catch up. JUMP *BAILED OUT* wormhole for hundreds of millions because they know an established middleware layer is worth billions if not trillions once scaled up
endorsed by SBF=endorsed by Larry Fink indirectly. + WEF, SWITCH. all the original crumbs, it was all real nigg*rs
the value of scaled up chainlink is GIGANTIC ENORMOUS FUCKING HUGE ENDLESS

[Anonymous No.50760112]

>>50760027
Who gives a fuck you retard? This shitcoin is never mooning.

[Anonymous No.50760119]

Who is Larry fink and what is Aladdin?

[Anonymous No.50760132]

>>50760112
>who gives a fuck
(You)

[Anonymous No.50760152]

>>50759797
lol. lmao

[Anonymous No.50760153]

>>50759626
>danksharting
crypto is the stupidest meme

[Anonymous No.50760171]

[Anonymous No.50760172]

>>50759988
you're double digit IQ for not realizing the XRP shills are literal bots

[Anonymous No.50760200]

>>50759797
>>50760027
Very based anon. I should've known that that the leadup to the institutional reveal was going to be a market purge.
Literally all we have to do is survive.

[Anonymous No.50760242]

>>50760172
i'm sure some are bots, but i think a lot of them are just so tortured by their mistake in buying xrp that they're completely mindbroken. Its an actual cult.

[Anonymous No.50760247]

>>50759797
It was Maker it was uniswap sigh, you ruined your larp

[Anonymous No.50760280]

>>50760247
It wasn't Maker*

[Anonymous No.50760287]

>>50760152
Kek

[Anonymous No.50760306]

>>50759626
if you know you know

[Anonymous No.50760345]

I'm also pretty sure that 80% of the comments ITT are GPT3 fud bots. It's like talking on a crowded train, you have to get accustomed to the noise so you can ignore it.

[Anonymous No.50760390]

>>50760200
Delusional. You won’t survive

[Anonymous No.50760456]

>>50760152
>>50760112
>>50759984
>>50759876
>>50760287
>you own link
>sloppy job simeon
>

>>50760247
correct my bad, adhd INTJ autismo when I have 1000 thoughts and concepts racing in my brain at the same time faster that I can type it all out so it all comes out sloppy and fighting the character limit
but it's all there and raw undiluted alpha spoonfeed, it seems rambly and disjointed but put together it's a big picture that makes perfect sense
og 20 cents intj linkies understand
both uniswap and maker shall bend the knee and kiss the ring in due time
uniswap needs xchain plans and ccip is the only viable option for high value protocols
maker oracle costs are too high but it's just a small team of stubborn engineers clinging to their position, they cost more for less security, down the line they'll just do like compound

[Anonymous No.50760481]

>>50760456
The only thing you're not right about, is giving the trolls/bots (yous). They wither without them.

[Anonymous No.50760559]

>>50759797
You are a MANIAC!

[Anonymous No.50760580]

>>50760456
yeah basically ever since ccip was announced it was clear that chainlink was trying to capture a portion of every conceivable transaction type. Every transaction on and off chain will require chainlink validation at some level, meaning a huge market of job requests for node operators, meaning high daily buying pressure for the token to pay the nodes. basicaly skimming off the top of the entirety of the crypto ecosystem.

[Anonymous No.50760632]

Wait until they realize the reason there are three (3) Consensys reps at SmartCon and Infura is running a node is because MetaMask will directly integrate CCIP.

[Anonymous No.50760643]

>>50760580
Fucking delusional fucktard

[Anonymous No.50760663]

>>50760580
>basicaly skimming off the top of the entirety of the crypto ecosystem
Bingo, the middleman to replace all middlemen.

[Anonymous No.50760684]

>>50760643
>ID: jyzzyJew

it checks out

[Anonymous No.50760695]

>>50760027
Could you explain more about ALADDIN? I fully understand the Chainlink/Eth takeover process but the blackrock side of things I am less knowledgeable about.

[Anonymous No.50760696]

>>50760027
based schizo mode anon making bulgarians squirm

[Anonymous No.50760710]

>>50760580
We’ve literally known about this since 2017. We’ve just been waiting whole they build.

[Anonymous No.50760719]

>>50760632
If it means wallets that auto-switch networks then that's a piece of UX that is long overdue.

[Anonymous No.50760725]

based schizo anon

truly an OG linkie

[Anonymous No.50760743]

>>50759626
Vitalik got rekt and his name will be irrelevant in history books or the minds of the people

[Anonymous No.50760750]

>>50759626
God it feels good to be a solo validator.

[Anonymous No.50760795]

>>50759626
i don't see how this won't become an arms race of builder dons competing on latency and "kickbacks" to proposers for the right to order tx.
how do you sell to proposers a fair sequenced don builder anyway? the hope that it will attract more fees because the market at large gets hard for less MEV?

[Anonymous No.50760801]

>>50760456
Top thread, anon, even if bits of it I was struggling with. It's really happening, isn't it? And it all starts next month, or maybe even sooner. Jesus Christ, I'm excited. Thank You.

[Anonymous No.50760802]

>>50760710
no, we knew that link would be used for inputs and outputs from the chain, and all the potential uses of that for derivatives, insurance, even payroll. We did not know that that we would be collecting fees from bridging between chains, rollups, and now even ethereum mining if OP is correct. So whats new hear is not only will chainlink be skimming off the top for every movement to and from the crypto environment, it will also be skimming off the top from the basic functions of the blockchain in the way miners do.

[Anonymous No.50760823]

>>50759626
>darksharting
TOP KEK Sirgay gottem again

[Anonymous No.50760837]

[Anonymous No.50760849]

>>50760802
>from bridging between chains
well that's what I always gathered from even the earliest diagrams

[Anonymous No.50760858]

>>50760802
Don't forget: while also having its own operating costs (gas) heavily subsidised because it's critical infrastructure that its host platforms can't do without.

[Anonymous No.50760893]

>>50760200
one more LINK dump to survive, courtesy of Bitcoin crashing and dragging everything with it. from there we decouple and never look back.

[Anonymous No.50760894]

>>50760456
based breadcrumb anon now called schizo.
What to buy during these times besides link?

[Anonymous No.50761033]

vitalik has no choice at this point. If the idea is that L2's take up most of the eth transaction volume, miners/stakers are going to make shit returns. Chainlink is planning FSS on every chain, not just arbitrum. If you go read the code, recent updates say initial implementation will use native ordering until full support is developed. Whether people want to admit it or not, eth is wasting away into a settlement layer that not many people will actually interact with. Chainlink on the other hand will quickly suck up any type of transaction/block rewards in all of crypto.

[Anonymous No.50761062]

>>50761033
just two more years and our real lives will begin

[Anonymous No.50761091]

>>50761033
Two more weeks q anons!

[Anonymous No.50761114]

>>50760802
remember the old crumb that the chainlink network will become the new miners? That one was eeearly as fuck.

[Anonymous No.50761137]

>>50760849
they added a sap speaker to smartcon, remember the old sap logos? Its true, all of it.

[Anonymous No.50761154]

Vitalik will probably end up working at Chainlink, in a prestigious position of course

[Anonymous No.50761167]

>>50759674
>>50759876
>>50760112
>>50760287
>>50760390
>>50760643
>>50761091
>seething and screaming impotently
We got a live one boys.

Blessed thread desu

[Anonymous No.50761169]

>>50761114
i don't recall that, but if it was early it was probably comparing link staking rewards to mining rewards in the sense that they're both modes of passive income. I doubt anyone knew we'd be taking over mining. I mean how much do just eth miners make in a day? 20 million? And that income stream would just be for chainlinks ion chain nfrastructure role. The majority of the money will come from API validation for smartcontracts.

[Anonymous No.50761175]

>>50761114
Basically everything has been crumbed, but remember something about this

$81k 2026

[Anonymous No.50761186]

>>50761167
did you notice his ID is jyzzyjew?

[Anonymous No.50761197]

They should all go to prison.

[Anonymous No.50761206]

>>50760456
Understandable, hope what you said does eventuate, good thread op

[Anonymous No.50761227]

>>50759626
Link is about to have an eth like run. High triple digits. They will call us lucky.

[Anonymous No.50761255]

>>50761227
just two more years

[Anonymous No.50761317]

>>50759626

[Anonymous No.50761336]

IS 1000 CHAINLINK CHUCK E CHEESE TOKENS ENOUGH TO MAKE IT?!?

if not how much longer roughly do I have to accumulate?

[Anonymous No.50761354]

>>50761336
if you wait long enough, 1,000 is probably enough to make a nice chunk of change
personally I think you probably have until like q2 or q3 of 2023 to accumulate but I'd love to be proven wrong

[Anonymous No.50761356]

>>50761336
2-3 years

[Anonymous No.50761377]

>>50759797

I can’t tell if you’re a genius or a schizo

[Anonymous No.50761379]

>>50761197
>be 2040
>klaus schwab and the WEF illuminati succeed with their 2030 agenda
>earth is broken up into different administrative zones patrolled by the shadow people
>the majority of the population that survived the CERN portal event in 2025 are hooked up to a matrix like grid of pods and fed insect based protein slurry as they twitch stream candycrush to earn BAT to pay their rent to their pod lord
>But its not so bad
>Klaus only claims dominion over the surface zones, so the majority of link marines just float by on one of airship anon's custom link airships or live in the New Atlantis citadel on the sea floor south of the azores on the mid atlantic ridge
>occasionally Klaus will transplant his head-in-a-jar onto his enormous mecha spider and try to take swipes at us, but we just float above him and show him our dicks
>XRP is still trading at 30 cents

[Anonymous No.50761391]

>>50761356
>>50761354
so 10k should be the goal if we don’t have some mega pump in the coming months?

Im getting closer to 2k with every wagie check but I only make 7k a month

[Anonymous No.50761394]

>>50760802
Assuming OP is correct, how does the link token fit into all of this?

[Anonymous No.50761416]

>>50760559

dude... SO ARE YOU
you are in every fucking thread saying the exact same shit! "the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result"

[Anonymous No.50761435]

>>50761391
>only make 7k a month
Only? 7k a month is an excellent wage.

[Anonymous No.50761442]

>>50761391
10k is a great stack imo

[Anonymous No.50761491]

>>50761394
the way chainlink is set up you can only pay for node validation with the link token, like how you can only pay gas fees with eth. Projects choose tokenomics like this because they require economic guarantees as well as cryptographic ones. For example eth would be easy to sybil attack if miners didn't have an economic incentive not to accept bribes. its a similar idea for link nodes and the link tokens.

What OP is talking about is a source of jobs for these link nodes. Eth staking will require chainlink validators, so that means anyone who needs to pay gas fees will have to also pay node operators in link which means they will have to buy link off the open market to pay them with. This will be on the back end though, automatically done without the end users knowlege and just baked into their gas fee.

What this means is that a percentage of daily gas fees will become daily buying pressure for chainlink, creating a floor for the price based on daily usage. It will also be money in the pocket of link node operators and stakers.

The tokenomics of link staking has always revolved around this feedback loop of network usage. Right now we're in a speculative stage, but as the network matures the value of chainlink will be based on the market for chainlink validation jobs.

[Anonymous No.50761537]

>>50759626
Chainlink had the majority of its funds on Celsius. They are bankrupt. Why do you think they are trying to get close with the fans all of a sudden with the Sergey burger meet?

[Anonymous No.50761547]

>>50761435
more like 4-5k and 2k of disability gibs

[Anonymous No.50761791]

>>50761547
jealous

[Anonymous No.50761837]

>>50761491
Good god, can you imagine NEETs getting a share of every network’s usage fees?

We really are going to be filthy rich aren’t we? It’s all true. $1000 EOY is FUD.

[Anonymous No.50761935]

When does the fucking switch flip though. It's already known that CL will take over the world, but everyone refuses to say it. Until they do we depend on actual network growth for price appreciation and obviously the huge growth will take several years. We need another hype/mania phase so I can take some profits and avoid blowing my brains out in the short term.

[Anonymous No.50761957]

>>50761837
Well you have to remember that while eth mining would be a nice source of income, it isn't the real value prop of link. The thing that will really make us rich will be actual adoption of smartcontracts into establishment infrastructure.
It was all real, it just took a long time. Maybe we'll have a few more delays and dissapointments, but we're entering the good times i think.

[Anonymous No.50762000]

>>50761935
not necessarily. imagine what would happen if chainlink started pumping in the bear market like it did last time. Everything else is crashing or crabbing and link is pulling an ethereum all the way to 1k. I would think that in that scenario a lot of people would rebalance their portolios out of other projects and into chainlink in order to chase gains, which would cause it to pump even more. We could see chainlink undergo a speculative pump which would carry us into the next few quarters when the next version of staking would be released and allow us to earn more passive income. Now imagine chainlink hits all time high and staking allows for 5% apy. It would be a perfect storm.

[Anonymous No.50762202]

I refuse to get optimistic about the short term again. Last year was too brutal. Holding my stack, buying more on dips, and just waiting patiently.

[Anonymous No.50762265]

>>50759757
IM DANKSHIDDING AAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.50762267]

>>50761062
>>50761091
that fat cocksucker has put off this token for so long by the time this shit goes live my dick will stop working and i will have one foot into the fucking grave

[Anonymous No.50762297]

[Anonymous No.50762763]

[Anonymous No.50762800]

This just in, KOTATV has just learned the name of the suspect who took a MacDonald's hostage today and demanded all of the Big Macs. His name was Sir Gay Nasty Slob a part time coder and former Oracle Man for a Blockchain based fencing company called Chain Link. Their goal was apparently to LINk all chains but something went awry causing the Big Man himself, as he likes to be called, to "take action". A tense stand off followed as Sir Gay Nasty Slob took hostages and continued eating Big Macs until the local MacDonald's here in South Dakota was completely empty. At that point witnesses say he simply rolled over and gave up. Police rushed in at that point, angry, some say, they could not order any food.

[Anonymous No.50763043]

>>50760027
I think they want to control web 3.
We are going to need a cyber-constitution. Awful

[Anonymous No.50763122]

It smells like curry up in this bitch.

[Anonymous No.50763336]

>>50761547
lol how are you getting an income and disability? also my gf has extreme chronic back pain from a legitimate injury, how hard is it to get on disability for that kind of thing? trying to convince her.

[Anonymous No.50763839]

>>50759704
Because some dude called Dank came up with it and because it sounds kinda funny and the Ethereum guys are kinda funny guys.

Good video on the topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5p0TB77flM

[Anonymous No.50764658]

>>50763839
>pedo furries are kinda funny guys
[x] doubt

[Anonymous No.50764720]

95%
19/20

[Anonymous No.50764843]

>>50759797
Do you have a link to the PGP subsidizing from Vitalik?

[Anonymous No.50764968]

>>50759626
When will the surge happen?

[Anonymous No.50764988]

>>50761227
I will call you delusional.

[Anonymous No.50765004]

>>50764988
as long as you don't call me late for dinner

[Anonymous No.50765030]

>>50765004
kek
Today you will have your favorite insect tendies!

[Anonymous No.50765034]

I don't know if I can make it bros, been holding since 2017 and it's sounding like it's gonna be at least 10 fucking years until this thing MIGHT moon... I'm so tired.

[Anonymous No.50765063]

>>50764968
First update post merge. I'd guess late 2022 early 2023

[Anonymous No.50765110]

>>50759797
So what you are really trying to say is we are going to be having lots of sex soo?.

[Anonymous No.50765175]

>>50759797
Someone explain to a non tech retard from South Dakota as to why vitalik would be pissed about Sergey or chainlink. What’s the beef??? Eth needs oracles to be real world so what the issue? Wouldn’t vitalik and sergey be equals as far as bringing blockchain to the real world?

[Anonymous No.50765202]

>>50759797
This is possibly the most massive amount of copium ever to be put in one post. The merge will happen and none of this will come to fruition. Look deep into your heart, you know I'm right.

[Anonymous No.50765240]

>>50765202
This, its military grade copium

[Anonymous No.50765266]

>>50765175
Sergey is an outsider, not eth mafia. He will never be accepted and link will never be needed.

[Anonymous No.50765292]

>>50765175
Honestly we found it pretty confusing right from the start. Vitalik spent a couple of years just completely dismissive (like with this Toyotas comment, or his "hard to imagine oracles are worth $32m" comment") and then pivoted to straight up hostility with him begging Uniswap to pivot to oracles a year or two ago.
The sympathetic explanation is that he is an anti-establishment idealist and Sergey is the front man for establishment organisations like SWFIT, that Vitalik never really wanted to deal with or help do anything. The less sympathetic explanation is simply that he was threatened by the scope and magnitude of Chainlink's vision, and he realised that a settlement-connecting protocol would create a top dog even higher than the L1.

[Anonymous No.50765327]

>>50759626
Oh great more bullish news that won't affect the price at all and which will ultimately get brushed under the rug (no pun intended) when nothing ever comes of it.

[Anonymous No.50765402]

>>50765063
Are updates really done so quickly?
I was expecting something in the order of 1 year or more per update.

[Anonymous No.50765539]

>>50765402
Depends if you're talking about EIP4844 or The Surge as a whole. 4844 if definitely coming out within the next 12 monhts.

[Anonymous No.50765562]

>>50760632
I was wondering when someone would mention that. How about SAP, Cathay Financial, Hannover?

[Anonymous No.50765680]

>>50762000
checked

[Anonymous No.50765735]

>>50765175
vitalik has severe autism. He's a useless twigman who can't fuck women. But he used his autism to develop ethereum and it became really important. Ever since then people were very nice and accomadating to his sever mental retardation in social sitiuations and inability to navigate life. Ethereum is what allows vitalik to live in the world of pony t-shirts instead of the world of group homes and occasional rape. So he's not happy that chainlink is supplanting him and his gay pedo friends. If him and his gay pedo friends aren't on top, maybe they won't be able to be gay pedos any longer and they start to get beat with sticks in siberia again.

[Anonymous No.50765787]

>>50765735
whos were computer nerd pedos or old money pedos?

[Anonymous No.50765789]

Danksharding is named after Dankrad Feist. It's not a dudeweed reference.

Most PoS chains split the block producer and block validator roles now. This is not a link thing, you are reaching real hard.

[Anonymous No.50765801]

Hurr durr
When will they make transactions fast and cheap?

[Anonymous No.50765807]

>>50765787
Listen, if i had a choice between supporting decent god-fearing people and satanic pedophiles, it wouldn't even be a choice. But i don't have a choice. We live in hell. Now grow up.

[Anonymous No.50765816]

>>50765801
And when will you be able to host shit on ethereum?

[Anonymous No.50765835]

>>50759797
Thank you anon. You gave me a ton to read up on.

[Anonymous No.50765853]

>>50762000
everything is pumping though

[Anonymous No.50765864]

>>50765789
Any other block producers with native fair sequencing you can think of?

[Anonymous No.50766110]

>>50760027
Holy shit. Have sex.

[Anonymous No.50766412]

>>50759797
>it's a complete vampire attack on the entire eth network
Pardon me for being a brainlet, but isn't it a bad idea to attack the thing you exist on top of?

[Anonymous No.50766453]

>>50765807
my question has nothing to do with growing up. stop ducking the questiong

[Anonymous No.50766685]

>>50759797
This is actual schizo, but you might also be right. I am feeling conflicted.

[Anonymous No.50766849]

>>50766453
yes it does you retarded child. Pick a path I can take that doesn't involve evil. I'll take it. But there isnt' one.

[Anonymous No.50766905]

>>50762000
checked wagmi

[Anonymous No.50766927]

>>50765853
this is a relief rally, we're gonna retest bottoms next two weeks

[Anonymous No.50766966]

>>50766905
have some anime feed my fren

[Anonymous No.50766989]

>>50760009
the fuck is a dab

[Anonymous No.50767021]

>>50766849
And your only left with two shit choices you fucking mutt. You have to pick one, do you pick the old world order who at least has knows how the world works had a very good idea how the world works or blockchain fags that only accomplishment is inventing another ponzi. They both fuck kid. Pick one

[Anonymous No.50767146]

>>50759757
4thpbp

[Anonymous No.50767160]

>>50759797

[Anonymous No.50767271]

>>50766989
it's vaporized thc concentrate oil.

[Anonymous No.50767316]

>>50759674

[Anonymous No.50767321]

>>50759733
checked and same

[Anonymous No.50767371]

>>50760456
based INTJ

[Anonymous No.50767454]

>>50759765
didnt he link up with snoop'em dogg'em?

[Anonymous No.50767551]

>>50759626
add to this:
the long term plan of moneyskele is for there to be stateless-ness, with validators trimming data from X years back, and then just a 1-of-N assurance that a copy of the trimmed data exists somewhere
to do that, they need perfect certainy it's saved
add in LINK as a "proof of data" akin to proof of reserves, where every hour they get all block data, do some hash math to prove it's all there and correct, compare with 10,000 other LINK nodes doing the same, and with harsh harsh slashing penalties for being down then guarentee that 10,000 copies of the old state history will forever exist

[Anonymous No.50767563]

>>50767551
badda bing ching ching

[Anonymous No.50767596]

>>50759626
stakers are now MEW mafia
i guess nothing changed really

[Anonymous No.50767634]

>>50759626
a bonus: arbitrum nodes will be secured by chainlink, with FSS, but in the future when zk rollups become more feasible you'll have LINK there as a reliable source of off-chain computation to solve all the zk math in a timely manner for fast posting in the next chain block
and long long term it will be zk that truly brings global scale to ETH, and it will be LINK that facilitates that

[Anonymous No.50767675]

>>50767551
somewhere i have a very relevant screencap of a post positing how a blockchain is simply a function of proving x state at y time - or something to that effect. and that it doesn't matter how this is proved, and that the smartest players have already figured this out. it's a nice breadcrumb in that it doesn't go beyond that or mention any specifics. maybe that's why i always remembered it. and now i think we are starting to see it play out. if anyone knows what i'm talking about please post it. otherwise I will have to search when i get home in a few hours.

[Anonymous No.50767690]

>>50767675
1/2

[Anonymous No.50767697]

>>50767675

[Anonymous No.50767726]

>>50767690
>>50767697
based as hell. thank you. i never saw the other two posts.

[Anonymous No.50767741]

>>50767675
essentially likely that a blockchain is just a historical record of state that any computer anywhere can recalculate through to reach the same conclusion, so no one single source is needed since the blockchain itself is "the holy text" all must follow and abide by
if it were somehow possible to have the state distributed in countless nodes all in sync/agreement of state history and updates without a long record going back over a decade then the need for that long record is no longer required
i'd still imagine that blockchains themselves would be around for a much much time longer, but way down the line it might be possible to no longer need them, since the chainlink network becomes the arbiter of the state, and not just data from long prior used as the measuring stick everyone else bases their calculations of what the state is around it

[Anonymous No.50767789]

>>50767675
and too: i take that picture to mean "opening pandora's box"
since, once this starts to happen, and hits critical mass, it just won't be possible to stop or "put back in the box"

[Anonymous No.50767870]

>>50759626
Vitalik is a mega low iq nigger tbq
Classic midwit

[Anonymous No.50767883]

>>50767870
This. That pedophile tranny is going to become Sergey’s bitch. Can’t wait for it. Pedophile Skeleton seems like a useful idiot as best. The real world will teach him a lesson.

[Anonymous No.50767998]

Guys please help. I had close to 20k Links but lost half of it recently in the bullshit that happened. I have felt like shit everyday since losing so much of my stack. Now I only think about trying to make it back. I know that holding 10k will be enough to make it eventually, but every minute I'm thinking about sending the last of my stack to binance and leverage long it to make some back.

I will surely kms if I get liquidated but the risk is low and the reward is high since we have fallen so low now. Please help, what should I do?

[Anonymous No.50768108]

>>50767998
Dude don’t do it you fucking retard. 10k is going to be a behemoth stack soon. Your comparing your stack to others here so you seem a little inadequate, but you have plenty.

It would be one thing if we were in the old world and things were normal, but everything is fucked anyway, so it doesn’t even really matter in a sense. But at least you have your ticket to not end up in some UBI camp. And you should feel good in a sense because the fact that you put that much of your stack on Celsius but didn’t put it all on there you should be thanking your lucky stars cuz you could have easily put it all on there and be totally rekt like a lot of anons are.

Again yoh should be happy you didn’t put it all on there considering you were a rested and put so much on there to begin with.

[Anonymous No.50768214]

>>50768108
>10k is going to be a behemoth stack soon
this, but unironically

[Anonymous No.50768288]

>>50759626
The solution to your problem is to sunshard, i.e. go outside more

[Anonymous No.50768517]

>>50759797
>>50760027
based

[Anonymous No.50768659]

>>50765735
kek.

[Anonymous No.50768674]

This whole thread is a massive wall of text.
Fuck off, I ain't reading that shit

[Anonymous No.50768695]

>>50768674
avoid buying chainlink and eth at all costs and you're golden

[Anonymous No.50768729]

>>50759626
mETH not needed

[Anonymous No.50768730]

>>50768695
based fuck cucklink and pedo mETH

[Anonymous No.50768914]

>>50759626
imagine falling for the PoSHIT scam. LMAOOOOOOO!

>wants to be Bitcoin
>disregards what made Bitcoin Bitcoin
>reinvents 1970's tech of signed ledgers
AAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAH

[Anonymous No.50768982]

>>50759626
>THIS TIME IT'S HAPPENING FOR REAL
>DARK SHARTING AND FARTING IS HERE POWERED BY CHAINLINK ™ ® ©
>THIS IS YOUR LAST CHANCE TO BUY IN CHEAP
yawn

[Anonymous No.50769743]

>"token not needed" spammed against linkies for years
>chainlink ends up absorbing the entire space and makes every single other token not needed
What a shame

[Anonymous No.50769879]

>>50769743
based

[Anonymous No.50770002]

>>50768214
>two more decades.

[Anonymous No.50770263]

>>50767998
You actually believe risk is low after losing half of your stack you absolute mongrel?

[Anonymous No.50770367]

>>50760837
Chainlink was ethereums shadowfork all along

[Anonymous No.50770574]

you are beyond retarted if you think this is all about chainlink suddenly when no word is lost on this in the ethereum foundation or any governance forums. you telling me they all bend the knee and we haven't heard a beep about it? If this is true, the token price would gigamoon to hundreds of dollars within a few months

[Anonymous No.50770591]

>>50770574
its only about chainlink
and your buy orders aint gonna get filled nigger

[Anonymous No.50770596]

>>50770367
Woah

[Anonymous No.50770622]

DARKSHARDS!

[Anonymous No.50770774]

>>50761227
High triple digits is a bigger mk than apple lel.
Let’s go to 100 billions already and I will be happy.

[Anonymous No.50771197]

>>50770774
We could go to $1000 and have a much lower marketcap than apple.

[Anonymous No.50771741]

>>50771197
1000 is basically ethereum mkcap

[Anonymous No.50771819]

>>50766412
It's more of a picrel situation.

[Anonymous No.50771870]

>>50770774
Apple has a mc of 2,67 trillion. That would put Link at 2670$

[Anonymous No.50771975]

>last year you had to have 30K LINK to be in the top 1K holders
>now it's 40K LINK
what gives?

[Anonymous No.50772042]

>DARKFARTSHARTING IS SO INNOVATIVE THE ONLY THING THERE'S LEFT IS CALCULATING THE MC OF LINK WHEN WE MAKE IT ZOMG!1
>>50771975
you still need 35k you lying street shitter
what a sad state of affairs

[Anonymous No.50772137]

>>50772042
I last checked a month ago, you gigantic faggot why would anyone even lie about this? And I found the answer anyway you useless piece of shit, it's because the team split one of the wallets into smaller ones.

[Anonymous No.50772156]

>>50771819
In what way does chainlink "drink" Ethereum's milkshake. It doesn't parasitise ETH but unlocks value for both so it's more like it creates 100s of milkshakes for both parties.

[Anonymous No.50772198]

>>50772137
>caught lying
>doubling down
>hurrr it's the team's fault!
go back to whatever indian shithole you crawled out from, Ranjeesh

[Anonymous No.50772204]

>>50772156
And Chainlink drinks from each and every one of them, dumbass. That is what is implied, that any area ETH intends to “unlock value” (lol) Chainlink is there waiting with the palm of the hand extended.

[Anonymous No.50772258]

>>50771741
wrong, it's barely btc mcap

[Anonymous No.50772263]

>>50768914
bitcoin was supposed to have smart contracts

[Anonymous No.50772289]

>>50772204
>And Chainlink drinks from each and every one of them
It doesn't drink shit from anything right now, the token is barely needed.

[Anonymous No.50772333]

>>50772204
too bad it doesn't drink from the only thing that matters though
but I know
>DARKSHARTFARTING™ FIXES THIS, BUY NAO

[Anonymous No.50772375]

daily reminder to not fall for baggie copium hype. Search the archives for Arbitrum pre-release, you will find similar unrealistic hype. Just buy ETH and laugh at LINK baggies in a few weeks.

[Anonymous No.50772397]

>>50772333
checked and keked. Linkies are such a fucking joke at this point it's absurd, they will miss out on money AGAIN by not making the easiest trade in the history of crypto, buying and selling ETH post merge. Those who aren't all in ETH at this point are retarded.

[Anonymous No.50772441]

>>50772333
checked and kekked.
Everyone know eth is pumping because people wanna get forked eth.

[Anonymous No.50772448]

tldr sum it up better next time

[Anonymous No.50772497]

>>50759626
>CL
*blocks your path*: https://goplugin.co/

seirously, anbody heard of that decentralized oracle on xdc? xdc blockchain was just shilled by a blackrock exec and they already have dapps like a decentralized email service
https://xinfin.org/xdc-utility
never really heard of it here

[Anonymous No.50772619]

>>50759797
>9797
checked

[Anonymous No.50772760]

Old biz vibes thx guys for the thread

[Anonymous No.50772875]

>>50772497
shadowforked

[Anonymous No.50772885]

>>50766412
Are you seriously still at the point of "The Link Token is an ERC token, therefore CHAINLINK EXISTS ON TOP OF ETHEREUM."

What does that even mean? That's like saying "google.com runs in Safari on my phone. If Safari don't work, Google don't work" thereby ignoring the billions of dollars of hardware and software owned by Google, the myriad other services it offers, al the IP, etc etc.

Yes, the LINK token settles/transacts on the Etherum blockchain right now, but that is very trivial and irrelevant, especially once something like CCIP comes to life and tokens can be transacted easily and safely between many chains.

Broaden your perspective of what Web3 is or you're unironically never gonna make it newfag. You're way behind in understanding.

There are going to be a variety of L1s that will handle disparate use cases.

[Anonymous No.50772904]

>>50772619
God, look at the newfags here

[Anonymous No.50772923]

>>50772885
ETH is the only relevant L1, there will be many chains which are mostly irrelevant But the majority of activity will happen on ETH. There is going to be no cross-chain future.

[Anonymous No.50773268]

>>50772923
likely ETH will be the winner of the "public L1" that most settle on, while all the individual companies use shit like hyperledger on their own backend for things.
so those entities will have their own sovereign blockchains, but all post settlements or disputes on ETH since it's a massive, decentralized, and neutral party
so likely things like CCIP would facilitate that

[Anonymous No.50773508]

>>50759811
yep

[Anonymous No.50773658]

Thanks for the hopium i just market bought 2000 more stinkers now sitting at 23000. 2k more and im done.

[Anonymous No.50773817]

>>50772923
eh, I'm not so sure
a winning game or dapp on a different chain could really change things

[Anonymous No.50773886]

>>50773817
A shitty ponzi game on some dogshit chain won't change anything. ETH is a titan from a technical perspective that will never be dethroned. Serious entities won't take anything other than ETH seriously which is why I can't take CCIP seriously at all. The purpose of chainlink is to enhance the functionality of ETH. Cross chain interoperability is a complete and utter waste of time and I can't think of any instance where it is needed.

[Anonymous No.50773905]

>>50773886
Interoperability between ETH and a chain which offers services that ETH can't provide is a pretty obvious one.

[Anonymous No.50773908]

>>50773905
What the fuck won't ETH be able to provide that some other shitchain will?

[Anonymous No.50773920]

>>50773908
Confidential data and computation, for starters?

[Anonymous No.50773935]

>>50773920
What other chain can provide those, confidential data can be handled by chainlink if i'm not mistaken.

[Anonymous No.50773944]

>>50773935
Oasis, literally right now, is being used for secure multiparty computation. Why would a company like Meta choose some shitty chinese chain with a $400 million marketcap instead of just using Ethereum.

[Anonymous No.50773958]

>>50773886
>>50773908
Connections to private ledgers? You really lack both imagination and understanding of this space.

[Anonymous No.50773993]

>>50773958
He’s subtly fudding and retarded, ignore him.

[Anonymous No.50774019]

>>50773886
You’re utterly convinced there’s no future in blockchain gaming and yet it’s literally the usecase Vitalik was inspired to create ethereum for.

[Anonymous No.50774129]

>>50774019
blockchain gaming is utterly fucking retarded.

[Anonymous No.50774155]

>>50773817
>winning game or dapp
all code is open source, and can be copy/pasted
it's why BSC even got to exist: it forked ETH, and then copied existing successful things like uniswap into pancake swap via EVM
if it's just software like a dapp, then it's copied
and given the EVM is on almost every single chain, and the more chains your code runs on the more valuable, then EVM is used more and more, cementing it as the go-to standard in the space

[Anonymous No.50774231]

>>50774129
You’re utterly convinced there’s no future in blockchain gaming and yet it’s literally the usecase Vitalik was inspired to create ethereum for.

[Anonymous No.50774319]

>>50759797
>and people say there's no alpha on /biz/ anymore

[Anonymous No.50774379]

>>50774231
It'll be interesting to see what form of blockchain gaming works best. There's a lot of natural resistance to this from gamers, which I think is warranted due to stuff like microtransactions and pay-to-win games being horrible across the board. But I still think there's a winning recipe out there. Maybe GTA or Runescape with crypto, idk.

[Anonymous No.50774394]

>>50774379
Exactly. I think it will be something like that too.

[Anonymous No.50774626]

>>50772923
No it isn't. I think Hedera is more relevant than Eth even. You just think Eth is relevant because a bunch of stupid ICOs happened on it. Nothing significant happens on ETH and nothing can because of the inability to scale.

[Anonymous No.50774645]

>>50773886
>Serious entities won't take anything other than ETH seriously
those serious entities are currently building customized avax subnets

[Anonymous No.50774651]

>>50773886
You're an idiot. Hedera and Hyperledger alone are much more useful (and used) than Ethereum for non-bullshit applications. Ethereum is just a shitcoin vending machine that enables people to "invest" imaginary money into Defi.

[Anonymous No.50774661]

>>50773908
Ordering, timestamps, etc.

[Anonymous No.50774757]

>>50773944
Can you give me an explanation of what competitive advantage(s) Oasis offers over other L1s? I've never done a deep dive into it.

[Anonymous No.50774834]

>>50774757
Its niche is privacy. It's a modular blockchain so each "paratime" (similar to a parachain, basically functions as a rollup to the consensus layer) can have different parameters or usecases. RIght now it has an EVM paratime "Emerald" but nobody uses it because it doesn't do anything special besides high throughput and low fees. The main feature live right now is Parcel, which allows for confidential data tokenization, secure multiparty computation, basically a wide variety of features to enable the monetization of data without exposing it. It's a pretty different ballpark from what most people think of when they think "blockchain." It also enables the usage of data while staying compliant with regulations like GDPR. The other main feature which is still in testnet is private defi using secure enclaves. This is similar to SCRT if you are familiar with that, but with a better overall architecture. They are gonna launch two paratimes, one for confidential wasm defi and one for confidential EVM-compatible defi, which afaik will be a first-mover in the case of the latter. I can give more info but that's a brief overview and I don't want to throw the thread off topic because I'm not here to shill. My point was mainly just that Ethereum and other EVM chains are just focusing on scalability and decentralization without thinking about what novel usecases users actually want.

[Anonymous No.50774843]

>>50761227
See you in 3 months at $4.89

[Anonymous No.50774881]

this is some crazy schizo hopium and I like it, but token still not needed

[Anonymous No.50774896]

>>50774834
I would like to learn more, can you provide more resources? I also am happy to start a new thread and link here if you wanna discuss it there. I appreciate it anon.

[Anonymous No.50774913]

>>50774651
Literally no-one gives a fuck about hedera, it is useless centralised dogshit that will never be used for anything, have fun holding this heavy bags while ETH moons, retard.

[Anonymous No.50775030]

>>50774896
Sure, I made a thread here: >>50775024

[Anonymous No.50775531]

>>50759797
orz

[Anonymous No.50776055]

>>50763336
VA disability, it’s pretty common after leaving military service there’s a bunch of anons here i’ve talked to on it as well. Pay scale goes from $150-$3500 a month and in most cases you can still work. Money is tax free. As for your girl i’m not sure man.

[Anonymous No.50777586]

[Anonymous No.50777689]

>>50774843
this probably

[Anonymous No.50777729]

>>50777586
cringe

[Anonymous No.50777731]

>>50777729
Go back

[Anonymous No.50777760]

>>50777731
you're a bot

[Anonymous No.50777771]

>>50777586
cringe

[Anonymous No.50777950]

>>50759626
1000$ per LINK EOY

[Anonymous No.50778120]

>>50777729
>>50777771
nice projection

[Anonymous No.50778324]

>>50777777

[Anonymous No.50778622]

>>50759674
I think he is saying danksharting is the new Chainlink cope that will cause marines to hodl through the next bullrun while sergey spends all their money buying lambos and hiring HR and marketing roasties.

[Anonymous No.50778771]

>>50777760
I’m a fud bot programmed by chainlink labs and you need to go back.

[Anonymous No.50779271]

>>50759797
>NO ONE knows but it's all written down
thats called speculation lol

[Anonymous No.50779281]

>>50779271
That’s… why we’re here

[Anonymous No.50779478]

>>50761379
>mecha-spider Klaus
Holy kek

[Anonymous No.50779518]

>>50759626
Oh no, my investment in ROOK is will be totally pointless after this goes through, huh?

[Anonymous No.50779682]

>>50759797
Was Vitalik in the end manipulated into doing this or is he just passionate about the tech and didn't see the big picture kek?

[Anonymous No.50781642]

this thread excites me. i am excited.

[Anonymous No.50782187]

>>50779682
He had a different vision of the future

[Anonymous No.50782492]

Lorenz Kemper
Digital Business Accelerator
Hannover Re

Hannover Re is a reinsurance company based in Hannover, Germany. It is the third-largest reinsurance group in the world, with a gross premium of around €27 billion.

[Anonymous No.50783101]

[Anonymous No.50783186]

>>50761537
it's crazy that they didnt do any due diligence on celsius. the celsius crew was known to be shady. how didnt they have intel on this

[Anonymous No.50783587]

>>50782492

Finally someone noticed

They work together with Lemonade on a project
And Obviously Link

[Anonymous No.50783678]

>>50783587
>https://www.ledgerinsights.com/hannover-re-part-of-lemonade-blockchain-dao-for-parametric-climate-insurance/
>The solution will be rolled out within a year and enable farmers to make and receive payments on their mobile phones using stablecoins or local currencies.
at last the crop insurance sergey has been babbling about

[Anonymous No.50783781]

>>50759797
great, but
>CCIP does not exist yet
>FSS does not exist yet
>DECO doesn't exist yet
>even fucking Town Crier has not been implemented yet
I know the typical counter-argument that they have not implemented it yet because they need to build a sound foundation first / build trust / network effect etc., this may all be true, but as a really experienced ex-software engineer and now technical project manager let me tell you - each of those missing features will take a lot of time to release, their core team is tiny and they can't just throw resources at it to speed development up, it's not how software engineering works. I'm aware they are probably running some proof of concepts of all those systems on testnets using dev builds of code that's not made public. BUT even assuming they decide to integrate all of those proofs of concept into the core repo right now, it would still take them probably ~2 years to get it production ready. So I agree this all sounds great, but if you believe they might show something massive in September of this year, you're delusional

[Anonymous No.50784831]

>>50783781
Some of this stuff is already ready and is just waiting on staking to be out first.

[Anonymous No.50784848]

>>50783678
Crop insurance = global warming insurance = high esg scores
The blackrock schizo shit is real

[Anonymous No.50785233]

>>50784831
CCIP is not even in alpha, Town Crier is a dead end as of now (SGX vulnerabilities), perhaps DECO and FSS might be ready, but I highly doubt that

[Anonymous No.50785285]

>>50783678
crop insurance for the farmers WEF wants to put out of business?

[Anonymous No.50785333]

>>50784848
You thought this shit was a joke anon?

[Anonymous No.50785962]

>>50784831
Which of those four features do you believe to be ready on some mythical private repository and just waiting for staking? Is there any evidence to support that claim?

It's likely core functionality of those features is being developed as (private) libraries to be used by the Chainlink Node (like for example their transaction manager, OCR and OCR2 were), but integrating that into the actual node will still be a major effort. Considering it's Q3 already and work on it has not started yet, my experience tells me there's like 10% chance they actually release anything major this year.

[Anonymous No.50786171]

>>50759733
tfw this and Truebit.

[Anonymous No.50786333]

>>50785333
Checked

[Anonymous No.50786347]

>>50786333
What the

[Anonymous No.50786605]

>>50785333
>>50786333

Checked the checked

My Linkies stay super Stinky $1000 EOY

[Anonymous No.50786606]

>>50785333
checked

[Anonymous No.50786639]

>>50786606
We are going to raise hell and praise Dale. Link $81,000. They can’t shake us and we will be part of the elite oh yea oh yea.

[Anonymous No.50786857]

>>50785333
>>50786333
nice

[Anonymous No.50787321]

>>50785333
>>50786333
let the good times roll

[Anonymous No.50787525]

>>50759797
Absolutely based. Literally 2018 breadcrumb vibes

[Anonymous No.50787809]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tm8exI0DSY

ahem

[Anonymous No.50787851]

>>50787809
i want to die

[Anonymous No.50787866]

You know the FUD is getting weak when the absolute best they have is failing horribly at trying to disprove solid posts. Aside from that I'm not sure I've seen original FUD in months.

[Anonymous No.50787891]

>>50759797
Shemitah ends the day before smartcon. Everything in every market is going to crash except LINK. Holy fuck this is going to be insane. They will call us lucky.

[Anonymous No.50787898]

>>50787809
this business with blackrock is microshafts reward for being sufficiently woke. now they're allowed in on the insider trading, this aladdin shit is the algorithms blackrock (which owns a piece of every major corporation and demands woke compliance or they pull their massive investment) bases their trades on. this is how the economy works now, on woke compliance and blackrocks magic computer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBRtucXGeNQ

[Anonymous No.50787930]

>>50787809
I think this is actually nothing
azure shutdown their blockchain a few years ago

[Anonymous No.50787936]

>>50787898
i couldn't find an unedited clip without stupid memes or whatever but you get the idea

blackrock is the social credit score for corporations and is the reason they're all increasingly woke and retarded and scrambling to hire as many trannies and minorities and put out woke messaging and rainbow flags on pride month etc etc. in case anyone was wondering what was behind that theres your answer

[Anonymous No.50787948]

>>50787866
The only FUD that you need is the horrific price action. Just open up the chart and look at the doghshit you see before you. I showed a seasoned investor the chainlink price chart over the last two years and he started laughing.

[Anonymous No.50788056]

>>50787948
nice, did you tell him that they haven't turned on the tokenomics yet and the price so far was all speculative?

[Anonymous No.50788070]

>>50788056
OK when do they turn on the tokenomics? Two more weeks?

[Anonymous No.50788199]

>>50788070
First piece, staking support for Eth/usd, is almost definitely getting turned on at smartcon next month.

[Anonymous No.50788257]

>>50787948
If your "seasoned investor" is basing his investments solely on price action, then hes a fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.50788301]

>>50788199
And will no doubt have barely impact on the price.

[Anonymous No.50788344]

>>50788257
“Nooooooo you have to virtue signal by losing money”…stfu you fucking loser. The ONLY thing that matters is price action. This is an investment forum

[Anonymous No.50788358]

>>50788199
“Almost definitely”…is that even English? Which is it bucko? Or are you just gonna use jew lawyer speak so youre never technically “wrong”

[Anonymous No.50788366]

>>50787809
>Joseph Chalom
toppest of keks

[Anonymous No.50788372]

>>50788301
Exactly. But just two more years bro!!! Then the REAL staking is released and muhhh shorts finally get burned

>and then everyone claps

[Anonymous No.50788425]

>>50788372
this redditor in every link thread today. just ignore the twat

[Anonymous No.50788476]

>>50772156
Milkshakes give me the shits

[Anonymous No.50788494]

>>50788344
lmao if the only thing that matters is price action then your investor bro wouldn't invest in any crypto peroid

[Anonymous No.50788506]

>>50788425
Maybe, just maybe, your shitty coin isn't popular on Reddit because redditors are smart enough to smell bullshit and not to trust something that only racists on 4chan like.

[Anonymous No.50788544]

why cant chainlink get emin to appear at shartcon?
even charles isnt going and chainlink are supposed to be working with ADA
if the blockbuilder anon is correct and chainlink are an integral part of pos eth why are there no eth devs going to shartcon???

[Anonymous No.50788555]

>>50788506
Weak bait.

[Anonymous No.50788569]

>>50788506
This is the kind of garbage FUD I was referring to earlier lmao. Although pretty sure you are just memeing

[Anonymous No.50788584]

>>50788555
Lol, it's not bait buddy. Go to literally any of the top r/cryptocurrency posts and you'll find that they're well researched and thought out. Half the threads on this chan are off topic bullshit that belong on pol. And that goes for link threads doubly so.

[Anonymous No.50788613]

>>50788584
>go to leddit
no go back nigger

[Anonymous No.50788621]

>>50787809
is this real

what the fuck, it's like a video generated by gpt-3

[Anonymous No.50788643]

>>50788613
Der Chuden

[Anonymous No.50788661]

>>50788584
But broooooooo muhhhhuu secret link klubbbbbb. We fuddededed out the bad reddit guyzzzzzz right guyzzzzthhh!?!? In before:

>just have your time machine go back and buy the dip in 2018

C O P E faggots. Sergey FUCKED us all and releasing baby beta staking will do NOTHING and you know it

[Anonymous No.50788770]

>>50788584
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

[Anonymous No.50788844]

>>50788643
who?
>>50788661
>us

[Anonymous No.50789765]

>>50787891
based

[Anonymous No.50789792]

>>50788544
at least in other years they have slowly rolled out speakers
so i'd expect some more bigger names the closer to the date
although i wouldn't put it past sociopath charles to not attend as chainlink hasn't gone live on cardano yet (as it's a waste of time, will be bottom of the list) and he'll be salty about that

[Anonymous No.50790216]

>>50786639
I have all of these saved and they bring me back to 2k17 everytime

[Anonymous No.50790435]

>>50787891
>Shemita
18/19 links here would be shouting this from the roof tops every day. wonder what happened, guess the combo astroturfing and midwits moving to twitter really did work to kill the volume. we're clearly experiencing a resurgence in genuine link sentiment/threads right now though. If anyone could comment more on what exactly shemitah is in regards to finance/happenings I'd be interested, not really too brushed up on my jewish mysticism lately

[Anonymous No.50790473]

>>50785333
>>50786333
IT'S HAPPENING

[Anonymous No.50790523]

>>50785333
>>50786333
Been a while since we have seen gets like this in LINK threads... /biz/ is healing

[Anonymous No.50790889]

Posting in legendary thread.

[Anonymous No.50791145]

>>50788344
Checked

2/10 bait

[Anonymous No.50791569]

>>50761227

[Anonymous No.50791623]

>>50761394
its collateral

[Anonymous No.50791787]

so when do I buy?

[Anonymous No.50793107]

goodnight and God bless frens