[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 169 KB, 1125x1667, jb62ffr001e91.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50584210 No.50584210 [Reply] [Original]

how many of you are going to be sued? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>> No.50584233

Quick rundown?

>> No.50584235

>>50584210
Sued for what?
Not all of us live in the jewnited states

>> No.50584242

>>50584233
with jews you lose

>> No.50584276

>>50584210
suing over this is frivolous, bordering on malicious

I would try to get the initiating lawyer fined

>> No.50584285
File: 46 KB, 372x350, kike.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50584285

>>50584210
>just baby cock sucking, pedokike things

>> No.50584302

>>50584233
>>50584235
sued of the first tweet presumably

>> No.50584303

>>50584233
the guy got sued

>> No.50584315

>>50584233
He talked about Jessica Khater's previous line of work before she was hired at Celcius.

>> No.50584330
File: 66 KB, 637x680, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50584330

>>50584315
He wasn't sued for talking about it or posting the meme, he intentionally counterclaimed their DMCA takedown which means the idiot was directly inviting them to sue him. Pretty retarded move. OP leaves out a lot of context.

>> No.50584345
File: 430 KB, 463x652, kids.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50584345

>>50584302
uhhhm sweetie
How can you be sued for that?
Don't you amerigoys have freedom of speech?

>>50584315
She was a fucking whore and I jacked off twice to her vid.

>> No.50584376
File: 656 KB, 828x821, 1658454116094354.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50584376

>> No.50584392

>>50584330
kek imagine being the guy in celcius damage control that has to start emailing people and making phone calls because a retard posted the meme of your whore coworker again

>> No.50584411

>>50584392
Not necessarily Celsius. He didn't give much information just said "someone." So it could be someone representing Jessica directly.

>> No.50584457

>Before you send a counter-notice, you should consider carefully whether you are in fact infringing the complaining party's copyright. There are two reasons for you to consider this carefully. First, the counter-notice requires you to state, under penalty of perjury, that you have a good faith belief that your material was wrongly removed. You do not want to make this claim lightly because it might come back to haunt you. Second, if the complaining party has a good infringement claim, sending a counter-notice may trigger a lawsuit. If you are not prepared to stand up for your use of the copyright owner's work in a lawsuit, you should think twice about firing back a counter-notice. That said, copyright owners sometimes send bogus takedown notices that have no basis in law or fact, which are meant solely to intimidate the target. A prompt counter-notice can make these empty threats go away for good.

The fact that they initiated a lawsuit instead of backing down means this twitter fag is basically fucked because they have good reason to believe their claim was defensible in court. He should have read up on the legal consequences before counterclaiming. Can't wait to see the fallout of this.

>> No.50584484

>>50584210
If this is the same page back in facebook then the owner of that page is a huge faggot and deserve to get sued.

>> No.50584539

>>50584411
Upon further investigation that seems to be exactly the case. Here's a previous takedown request against various sites made on behalf of Jessica.

https://lumendatabase.org/notices/25216054#

>> No.50584543
File: 268 KB, 640x520, 1657942541948.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50584543

>>50584330
Does anyone here have this meme???

>> No.50584559

>>50584233
Celsius stole all your money and now they're going to put you in jail for slandering them for saying they were stealing money.

>> No.50584585
File: 109 KB, 311x274, 1654666431667.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50584585

>>50584330
>YOU'RE JUST A BLACKPILLED INCEL LOSER
It's funny that something along those lines is the response when you point out that society has reached a new level of FUCKED when a literal pornstar was hired to manage a billion dollars and then it all fucking collapsed
>b-but it's always been like this
Women got hired easily to secretary jobs to suck their old boss's cock, they didn't get literally promoted to near-ceo levels while only having experience servicing penises publicly documented. We have reached the endgame of of post-modern society, the question is now how long we can stay "almost economically crashing but not quite" to keep the ball in the air so all the whores and jews can suck whatever's left out of us.

>> No.50584603

>>50584585
I'm going to impregnate watame !

>> No.50584623

>>50584539
According to Lumen: "This studio has been sued and the judge declared all copyrights of this studio go to the women depicted in the videos."

So it seems Jessica now owns the copyrights to the original GDP video, which INCLUDES still images from the video. The image that the twitter fag originally posted contained a still image from the video. And Jessica has hired one or multiple "brand protection" agencies to scour the web looking for any and all pages with the video or images from the video. If you search her name on the Lumen database you'll find hundreds of results of takedown notices over the past year.

>> No.50584653

>>50584210
You fags have been posting that girls stuff for years to embarrass her for no reason. Good for her for slapping that fag with a lawsuit

>> No.50584678

>>50584345
>Cunningham's Law
works every single time tx

>> No.50584685

>>50584653
>for no reason

>> No.50584698

>>50584653
I don't like Celcius or care about her, but I dislike cancel culture. It's no different than leftists getting someone fired because they said something "problematic." I didn't like when /b/ did it in 2010, and it's gay now.
>>50584585
>a literal pornstar
She only made 1 scene. And she got fired like 2 years ago. But I believe that you believe that.
>>50584685
Okay, for what reason? Degeneracy? Because she managed a LINK portfolio?

>> No.50584704
File: 104 KB, 364x335, image_2022-07-27_035211128.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50584704

>>50584392
>hey Jamie
>Jamie, are you listening
>what is it this time Carl, more GDP memes?
>no this time they shopped that Jessica's porn scene with Mashinsky's face on the male pornstar
>that's what I said, so who do I send the lawsuit this time...?
>oh so that's what GDP means
>where do I send it Carl...

>> No.50584725

>>50584210
Jews are legit God’s chosen tier

>> No.50584729

>>50584685
She didn’t hire herself any of these places and she didn’t cause Celsius to get caught with their pants down. It’s just baseless harassment because she did porn once 10 years ago

>> No.50584746

>>50584210
they only do this to people they think they can scare and who don't likely have enough to hire lawyer but it is a dangerous gamble because all you have to do is file a counter suit and you can rape them for a settlement because they have no case. Once you challenge it they will fold like a lawn chair but then you get to say "whoa whoa whoa, Im gonna need lawyer fees and a settlement payment for emotional stress" and they will be forced to pay it. If you do the legal work yourself you can charge a fat fee for it still and pocket it all.

>> No.50584765

>>50584653
>kike link namefag
>defending a literal whore who debased her reputation by getting fucked for a porn video
all jews.

>> No.50584772

>>50584746
So basically kill all jews because all kikes are soulless lawyers. Got it.

>> No.50584777

>>50584539
>>50584623
very nice. so wheres the torrent so i can chop it up and sell it as nfts?
>>50584704
kek wat

>> No.50584788

>>50584772
Well you can buy a course that teaches you how you can do all this yourself. It is only 250 bucks. I actually fucked a lawyer and a bank defending myself and they had to pay 3 years of my property taxes. If you all want a link to the course let me know. It is 250 bucks I think but well worth it

>> No.50584791

>>50584746
Unfortunately I,TwitterFag is basically fucked because Jessica owns the copyright to the video and still images from it. By not only posting the images but COUNTERCLAIMING her claim he's set himself in a position to get raped in court. They would have folded at the counterclaim instead of suing if they weren't serious that they could win. The companies working on her behalf have taken down hundreds of images and have successfully removed thousands of links from Google. They aren't in a position of weakness here.

Not to mention if it goes to jury trial all she has to do is cry and say "I was coerced by this company into making this porn film" (something found factual as a result of the trial against GDP) "and all I want to do is make it go away because it's ruining my life and career boohoohoo" and she'll win. Regardless of how you feel about her and her choices, the reality is this guy is FUCKED.

>> No.50584798

Here are the documents to prove it if anyone wants to check them out.

https://files.catbox.moe/9tp8wu.pdf

>> No.50584817

>>50584791
videos? Not sure what is actually happening here then. I thought they were trying to sue him for slander or w/e for that tweet. Yah if he is fucking with their copyrighted material that is a whole other can of worms

>> No.50584826

>>50584765
I was fine with her being exposed and it being spammed all over biz then Twitter. It’s been years now..who knows how much money we cost her let alone reputation. Any where she works this will follow her, we won, it’s time to stop fighting the battle.

>> No.50584845

>>50584791
wait are we talking about that HAPA girl whose dad is a hedge fun guy? I dont understand what that tweet has to do with any of this. Am I just missing an inside joke with the tweet here?

>> No.50584850

>>50584817
Read my other posts further up in the thread. It's not Celsius suing him, but Jessica, because he posted and then counterclaimed an image containing a still image from her GDP porn video. You can surely find that meme image and even the original porn video with a few minutes of searching, despite her attempts, it's almost certainly in an archive somewhere.

>> No.50584860

>>50584850
right on, gotcha

>> No.50584926

>>50584302
>your honor sheesh fr this was being insulting fr bruh sheesh I is resting no cap sleep on this case cuh

>> No.50584985
File: 401 KB, 680x463, FTvzHAHWIAAgXSG.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50584985

Earn, Borrow & Cum

>> No.50585010

>>50584285
at this point, I'd rather suck a yellow dog's dick so my vinu bags don't die, although on the bright side that might not be too far from reality

>> No.50585105

>>50584623
Falls square into fair use. Found that dumb bitch sucking cock in two seconds flat.

>> No.50585167
File: 214 KB, 1500x500, 1500x500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50585167

>>50585105
Maybe, or maybe not. The image he posted was a still image from the video side by side with a screenshot of a news article about Jessica. A court may find it transformative to be considered fair use, or they may not. The copyright holder may try to argue that he's making money or in some way profiting from the image. In this screenshot he posted of a very small portion of the lawsuit it includes his LTC wallet address. This is found on his "support and crypto pledges" page after clicking through to the "wlo.link" page on his twitter bio. So it's clear that he makes a living from his twitter posts and other content, and the image isn't merely for personal use. Whether that would hold up in court, who knows, but obvious if they're suing him they're confident enough that they can win or at least force him to settle.

>> No.50585220

>>50584729
whores deserve to be stoned to death, day of the ropes coming jessica

>> No.50585286
File: 478 KB, 1080x2340, Screenshot_2022-07-27-10-06-08-816_com.brave.browser.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50585286

>>50584539
>adult woman decided to eat cum and get dicked in front of a camera for money
>she has FALLEN VICTIM to the practices of a porn studio
lmao women are truly subhuman
share webms of this whore

>> No.50585322
File: 724 KB, 846x715, 1658857774216542.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50585322

>> No.50585696

>>50585167
Some dumb slut tried that same shit with Sargoy of Akkad back a few years ago and ended up having to pay that greasy fucker $60k. If he fights it, and he will because twitter simps will pay his legal fee, he will win hands down. Copyright law is flimsy at best and useless at worst and some dumb kike slut, even with a kike lawyer, won't be able to find footing here. She's gonna be paying him at the end of this and is gonna have to go back to sucking cock for $150 a head.

>> No.50585734
File: 134 KB, 599x899, 756d9r.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50585734

>>50584543

>> No.50585772

>>50584330
>he intentionally counterclaimed their DMCA takedown which means the idiot was directly inviting them to sue him
How many layers of talmudic kikery are you living on in the JewSA lmaoooo???
I still don't get how any of this is worth sueing somebody.
Don't the kikes at celsius have more pressing matters to get occupied with? Idk, like giving back the billions they have stolen from all their customers?
If i was retarded enough to trust a kike and had any cash stolen by mashinsky, i'd unironically take my shotgun, find him and his family and shoot them all in the anus to pop them like balloons. Fucking jews i swear, they have no limits in the pilpul game and no shame game.

>> No.50585784

>>50585286
>she has FALLEN VICTIM to the practices of a porn studio
Strictly speaking yes, GDP broke the contract the girls signed by releasing the videos publicly, hence why the rights were reverted to the girls themselves.

>> No.50585802
File: 124 KB, 653x523, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50585802

>>50584653
She embarassed herself, and now she refuse to assume the consequences of her acts.
But i don't expect you to understand, niggers aren't really known to assume the consequences of their acts either.

>> No.50585826
File: 199 KB, 700x700, 1522637701627.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50585826

>>50584729
She's a prostitute, a scammer, a liar and a jew. That's 3 reasons to shame and harass her, and one reason to put her again the wall and pull the trigger.
kys subhuman negroid cum encrusted favela larvae.

>> No.50585845

>>50584791
I highly doubt that jessica personally owns the rights to that video

>> No.50585846

>>50585826
Reddit frog poster

>> No.50585851

>>50584845
>whose dad is a hedge fun guy
Was, he is kill now. And he was vice-prez of Goldman Sachs.

>> No.50585868

>>50584845
No, jessica khater, former head of institutional lending at celsius and forbes 30 under 30 who did a GDP video a couple of years ago

>> No.50585889
File: 243 KB, 820x930, 1601090090716.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50585889

>>50585846
>t. jewish soijackoid
now face the wall, shlomo

>> No.50585976

>>50584698
>She only made 1 scene
So she is a porn star then? Retard.

>> No.50586007

>>50585784
It’s crazy how many pro Jessica posters are here. Makes me wonder if she was a Israeli secret agent plant.

>> No.50586027

>>50585845
>Enright found all contracts signed by the plaintiffs unenforceable and void. He also found the plaintiffs hold all rights to their videos and ordered the defendants to remove the women's images from the GirlsDoPorn website.
https://www.courthousenews.com/women-win-13-million-in-girlsdoporn-fraud-suit/

>> No.50586035

>>50584704
holy fucking kek

>> No.50586059

>>50584235
Same thing they sued Craig Grant and Trevon James for. Promoting a scam. Craig is currently in hiding in Jamaica while I think Trevon just paid the fines.

>> No.50586078

>>50584623
? Just because she might own the rights to her slutty depraved face taking cocks on camera doesn't mean no-one can ever use it. Guess people just need to credit it fairly in future.

>> No.50586092

>>50586027
Fair use

>> No.50586100

>>50584985
kek, 6 billion spermcoin wiped out

>> No.50586156

>>50584985

Lol

>> No.50586164

>>50586078
>>50586092
The point is that a court or more importantly, a jury, might not find it to be fair use. >>50585696 mentioned the Sargon case a while back but the key difference was that was an entire video with commentary a critique involved in his use of some liberal bitch's video. In this case, the still from Jessica's porn vid was simply put side by side with a news article and that's it. No other commentary or critique from the twitter fag. Whether they would find that transformative enough to be considered fair use is up in the air. And of course, Jessica has the advantage of being the "victim" of a predatory porn company who allegedly coerced her into making the video in the first place, which is allows her to make an emotional plea that might be powerful enough to sway a jury.

In this case, I believe that if the case goes to jury trial, the twitter fag is royally fucked because he was stupid enough to counterclaim and didn't do a sufficient amount of research into the situation before making that counterclaim. Regardless of who's right or wrong, it's idiotic to pigheadedly stand your ground in the legal system against this bitch given the current liberal-dominated political landscape.

>> No.50586168

>>50586007
nah she just has 3 moist holes
that s enough to raise an army of pathetic simps

>> No.50586224

>>50586164
>didn't do a sufficient amount of research into the situation before making that counterclaim
Better yet, he publicly documented that he had no real idea what was going on before making the counterclaim, see >>50584330
He really invited that lawsuit.