Chainlink's ICO was September 2017, SmartCon is close to 5 year anniv

[Anonymous No.50562006]

>Chainlink ICO: September 18 2017
>SmartCon: September 28 2022

So that's the 5 year anniversary. It seems obvious they're not announcing anything until this date for sentimental purposes. If nothing gets announced, I imagine the feedback will turn into hatred and chaos. Let the countdown begin

[Anonymous No.50562028]

>10 more weeks

[Anonymous No.50562063]

[Anonymous No.50562093]

Sergey has abducted a couple of newborns in 2017 from a New York hospital, they are now 5 years old and groomed enough to suck dick and do laundry, he'll present his little project on main stage

[Anonymous No.50562108]

Holy fuck what are these replies

[Anonymous No.50562135]

>>50562028
Just 10 more weeks now!

[Anonymous No.50562210]

>>50562006
Chainlink was always a 10 year hold, we are now almost 50% through! another 5 years and we finally make it!
I didnt sell 1 LINK and I kept buying all these years! I have a big stack by now haha
so celebrate with my and this picture of sergey today, eat a big mac or another food item of your choice.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWLIgjB9gGw

[Anonymous No.50562756]

>>50562006
Dude, for Sergey’s own personal safety he better have something pretty fucking good planned for this shit. Otherwise I don’t see how he leaves his stupid Big Mac meetup alive if the price keeps tanking. All it takes is one psycho from /biz/ and he’s in big trouble. Honestly concerned for this safety desu.

[Anonymous No.50562787]

>>50562006
hoping nothing gets announced so we crash to $3.50

[Anonymous No.50562797]

>>50562756
Someone threatened him and horse rimmer on twitter, people are starting to lose it. The opportunity cost is fucking enormous based on the numbers crypto pulled 2020-2021

[Anonymous No.50562924]

>>50562797
I don’t know if Chainlink realizes how absurd the situation looks. Let me break it down. Chainlink is hosting SmartCon in person. They would like us to pay $1477, actually never mind make that $777 since no one was paying $1477, for the privilege of possibly sitting down face to face with the man responsible for making you completely miss the 2021 bullrun. Are they really that daft or are they just trying to insult us at this point? I really don’t know. This is why if SmartCon is a complete nothingburger (and my gut feeling is telling me yes, it absolutely will be a complete nothingburger) then I genuinely have concerns for the safety of attendees at SmartCon. At least last year we had SOME developments trickling out over the year. OCR released, Arbitrum go-live, more node operators. Sure, they didn’t result in any meaningful price action but at least it showed that Chainlink was still doing work behind the scenes. We’re almost in fucking August and what the fuck has even happened this year? Literally nothing. Just some stupid blogposts about what they want to do with staking. SmartCon needs to have something actually decent for once. But the price cut and Big Mac shit really isn’t getting my hopes up.

[Anonymous No.50562941]

>>50562756
rumors are swirling that the chainlink network is susceptible to a wrench attack that could take down the whole project

[Anonymous No.50562952]

>>50562924
the thing that's insane is that in spite of this I'm still considering buying a ticket
a trip to nyc could be fun...

[Anonymous No.50562987]

>>50562924
basically its a show of strength. sergey knows that plebs like me who bought LINK brand tokens won't have the guts to do anything and inbetween bites of Big Macs he plans to philosophize on "there's more to life than checking the price of LINK and jacking off to anime"

[Anonymous No.50562989]

they will announce staking and CCIP on September 18, ten days before SmartCon.

[Anonymous No.50562992]

>>50562924
You fudfags are beyond comprehension...you literally must not have a wife, children, friends,job, hobbies In order to spend time and mental effort creating this much bullshit on a daily basis for chainlinkdpamk

[Anonymous No.50563000]

>>50562952
dont you have to be vaxx maxxed?

[Anonymous No.50563028]

>>50562924
Precisely why this is a make or break moment for the project. In most of 2020 and 2021, the team was pushing Celsius, Bancor, etc. as huge partners and key launch partners for CCIP. So even more anons lost their LINK thanks to the team supporting insolvent projects. It's worse than Moab token or Lady Luck because many anons have 5k-20k link stuck on these platforms, in addition to Nexo and BlockFi

[Anonymous No.50563051]

>>50563028
Mark Richardson and Mashinsky should be this year's surprise guests

[Anonymous No.50563065]

Why do you think they are catering so much to le heckin community right now? They need Sergeys close disciples at the event for the blood sacrifice, it's gonna be a false flag mass killing for moloch, all according to ari's plan

[Anonymous No.50563070]

>>50562006
“As American freemen, we cannot but sympathize in all efforts to extend the blessings of civil and political liberty, but at the same time, we are warned by the admonitions of history and the voice of our own beloved Washington to abstain from entangling alliances with foreign nations.” - Zachary Taylor (12th president of the United States.)

[Anonymous No.50563083]

>>50562987
kek that is a reasonable point. Majority of fags would do fucking nothing and probably suck him off.
>>50562992
Well done not refuting anything I said. How fucked in the head do you have to be where you cannot handle any type of criticism of your investment?
>>50563000
If you’re a foreigner trying to enter the US, yeah. But if you’re already in the US I don’t think there’s any requirements.
>>50563028
Good point actually, didn’t really think of the Bancor and Celsius situation.

[Anonymous No.50563092]

check this out
https://twitter.com/ArbitrumDevs/status/1551554583155163136
arbitrum one is headed to testnets
I refuse to get my hopes up again but
full chainlink and arbitrum integration reveal at Smartcon?

[Anonymous No.50563115]

>>50563092
this thread was a good read too
>>/biz/thread/50551476

[Anonymous No.50563124]

>>50563028

[Anonymous No.50563138]

>>50563092
>putting breadcrumbs in low energy self-loathing fud threads
just don't, anon. Start a new thread. Don't get mixed up with the losers.

[Anonymous No.50563144]

>>50563115
I find it strange how this thread got pruned and anons were having trouble opening it. While 12 fud threads stayed up.

[Anonymous No.50563149]

>>50563000
no that was austin

[Anonymous No.50563157]

I am a bot

[Anonymous No.50563195]

EIP 4488 sets the precedent for 'public good' layers to get preferential on-chain treatment.

Oracles need to be recognized as the ubiquitous layer 0 and public good service on which blockchain applications run.

The fact that Chainlink has to compete with all dapps to push price data on chain during crisis events, so all those dapps can remain operational, is utterly mind boggling.

The fact that Chainlink has to subsidies the core infrastructure of the entire defi economy out of its own pockets, while carrying all the multi chain, systemic risk of failure on its shoulders is utterly mind boggling.

We've had endless conversations about how solving the oracle problem wasn't simply a complex technical matter, but a complex chicken and egg economics problem as well. It requires an economy of scale despite dapps barely existing 3 years ago.

The fact that they succeeded so brilliantly & rapidly, achieving scale, sustainability and profitability in these adversarial conditions, is a testament to how fundamental the oracle layer is & how forward thinking, aggressive and hard working the cl team really is. It is, again, mind boggling. But in all the right ways.

Chainlink is now, by far, the most widely integrated middleware solution across the entire industry. And while it can sustain bootstrapping the entire industry and cover the gas expenses, it's about time that chains begin to recognize its pivotal role in the ecosystem as a main driver of dapps innovation and adoption.

And that ultimately means enabling oracles to have their own dedicated tx lane, slashing their gas costs entirely, as well as financially contributing to their growth. With staking and the partners growth program, this will accelerate.

Vitalik, for all his autistic genius, failed to foresee this and failed to understand his own baby and where and how it would generate value. Real world data, off chain compute, cross chain messaging. Ethereum will be reduced to a simple execution layer.

[Anonymous No.50563205]

>>50562924
Kek the price really is $777. They better have something, fucking ANYTHING to announce or I'm legitimately putting everything in cold storage and burying it in a time capsule for 77 years.

[Anonymous No.50563207]

>>50563144
checked. yeah really makes you think

[Anonymous No.50563235]

>>50563083
>bomb/shooting threats
>criticism of your investment

[Anonymous No.50563274]

>>50563235
Excellent reading comprehension you fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.50563283]

>>50562756
Thought the same thing

[Anonymous No.50563289]

>>50563274
They not to burst a blood vessel, spastic

[Anonymous No.50563290]

>>50563124
It is sad, but we warned people about Celsius.

[Anonymous No.50563316]

>>50563289
You have nothing to actually say. You know it’s ok to process negative emotions, right anon? Coping with delusions is deeply unhealthy and it’s fine to be open and honest about your feelings. You need to stop thinking in such black and white ways and actually have a conversation instead of getting mad that someone isn’t praising your investment all the time.

[Anonymous No.50563341]

>>50563316
>hammering keyboard in a rage at a situation you have no control over
>processing negative emotions
ok lol
dont (You) me again, I'm out

[Anonymous No.50563396]

>>50562063
>aw shit here we go again

[Anonymous No.50563404]

>>50563124
>$1.50

Bad, but not as bad as ico anons losing everything. Still, Mashinsky should be dealt with

[Anonymous No.50563409]

>>50563138
they aren't really breadcrumbs though

[Anonymous No.50563439]

>>50563316
I doubt anyone would do anything to Sergey. If anything the incel shooters from twitter would go after Mashinsky and the Bancor nigs. The performance of the token sucks but so does everything else

[Anonymous No.50563455]

>>50563439
Sergey is the mastermind though
people trusted Celsius because of Sergey

[Anonymous No.50563475]

>>50563341
Faggot. See you next time when you still have nothing to say. Hope your feelings aren’t too hurt because your investment wasn’t praised.

[Anonymous No.50563482]

>>50563455
no one trusted celcius youre just retarded

[Anonymous No.50563499]

>>50563475
He just said don’t (you) him again. Now beat it!

[Anonymous No.50563511]

>>50563290
I don’t know how actual LinkMarines cope with having lost their stack on there. It’s one thing if you find some shitcoin that might do something neat for the cryptosphere and sell it way too early or even lose it on Celsius but would only maybe get meager gains. But Link is clearly the motherload and you were part of a community that figured it out before everyone else, and going into the 1,000’s is very likely and you knew it because of everyone here. Totally different holding bitcoin from 5$ to 100$ and selling and not having any clue it would go to 50,000. That would sting like fuck but it wouldn’t be life crushing because how could anyone know it would go be high. I don’t think I’d be able to cope at all.

Of course the guy in that screenshot wasn’t clearly a link marine cuz he got in at $1.50. Probably a Reddit tourist that came here.

[Anonymous No.50563515]

>>50563341
Its okay baby he’s gone now. Sshhh sshhhhh come here kitten.

[Anonymous No.50563518]

>>50563482
I didn't use celsius
but I have heard other link holders say here on biz and also telegram, discord, and twitter that they wouldn't have used celsius if Sergey hadn't basically endorsed it

[Anonymous No.50563533]

>>50563404
Like I said above. He isn’t a Linkmarine. He was probably a Reddit tourist. But he still put a shit ton of money in and probably had 50k+ easy

[Anonymous No.50563594]

>>50563518
I know the “not your keys not your coins” is grandpa like advice…and I understand the temptation of APY but I would have had a very high level of fear if it came to the point where I was actually transferring them to this company. Would have been a survival instinct. And just the absolute retardation of putting all your coins in there if you had 30-70k stacks. I mean if I had 70k I might have done it and put 10-20k in maybe. Knowing I still have a top 800 stack. And if it got stolen it wouldn’t be that big of a deal. But all of it? Holy shit.

[Anonymous No.50563634]

>>50562006
It’s common knowledge that 90% of LINK OG’s came from /pol/, and are thus unironic Nazis and extremely racist. This is evident when you look at the chats whenever Chainlink presents at conferences such as consensus or smartcon. It’s always N word this, N word that.

I personally don’t want to put my money into a project like that and keep that sort of company. Moreover, I question the intelligence of people who shill LINK given their backwards and racist political views.

[Anonymous No.50563635]

>>50563455
people trusted it because they were too stupid to read the terms and conditions

[Anonymous No.50563691]

>>50563115
Always fun reading threads like this.

I stopped opening and replying to the FUD threads, I had ignored them. On a rare occasion, I opened one and it was full of fud with similar writing styles responding to each other. I guess most anons can't be bothered to argue anymore, like me.
So these shit threads have become some sort of echo chamber for fudders, where they recycle and eat each others' shit.

[Anonymous No.50563771]

>>50563594
yeah, I agree

[Anonymous No.50563803]

>>50563635
people don't know how to read smart contracts either
there was insane bull market happening and regular people were looking for a "safe" way to earn yield
the fact that the yield wasn't insane and the fact that it was being marketed by the leading company in the space as something people should use
they announced a major forthcoming integration
there's absolutely blood on Sergey's hands

[Anonymous No.50563841]

>>50562989
This is the ultimate security movie. Better than hiring bodyguards for Smartcon. Rogue anons won't want to harm them then.

[AJ No.50563847]

918

[AJ No.50563898]

928

[Anonymous No.50563964]

>>50563803
Have to agree. CelsiusX was their DeFi arm and Chainlink promoted the fuck out of it. Also tied it in with CCIP. Bancor too, all those Bancor chats and hyping V3 using LINK oracles. Celsius used LINK for price feeds and Mashinsky praised proof or reserves which is ironic

>>50563533
True, $1.50 isn't biz but not reddit either

[Anonymous No.50564687]

>>50563533
Dude even an ico og with 100k on a ledger has 6 figures, that’s it. Og’s got fucked so hard and short of link climbing to $100 someone is going after the team at smartcon

[Anonymous No.50564781]

>>50562924
Thats why they will have burgers so Big Serg can say "this is a big nothingburger anon"

[Anonymous No.50564827]

>>50563847
>>50563898
729

[Anonymous No.50564833]

>>50563195
Well said, Eric.

[Anonymous No.50564886]

>>50564827
>FAFAFAFAFAFA
look at this retard.

[Anonymous No.50565493]

Syscon just hit Lunar Crush's number one of recent with more people curious about what is being built than ever before. The company has proven resilience in ALL market conditions over the years. It’s here to stay.

[Anonymous No.50565560]

>>50562006
>>50562924
>>50563195
>>50563964
It's over bros, LINK is not new tech, a hidden gem, or a coming 10-100x. LINK is mainstream and is in Twitter roasties bio. It’s a corporate entity now, so Sergey has to dump another 750k LINK to hire talent managers and diversity officers. LINK hasn’t been the biz token for over 2 years now. Just sell anons... i-i-iit’s over. It was a good ride.

[Anonymous No.50565579]

>>50564781
kek

[Anonymous No.50565614]

I bought at 40 dollars when the second whitepaper was released and since then the price has plummeted and the team isn't doing shit. It's over

[Anonymous No.50565645]

Fuck me a semi decent thread where anons are swimming around in the murky pool of uncertainty. This is feeling like mid 2018.
I can't even see many pajeets or bots shitting up the thread. This has me feeling comfy.
I've posted crumbs on here already but I know the fidelity talk will be worth watching. It's been a year since they last presented so it will be interesting to see what they've been working on that utilizes link. I'll be expecting to see them added to the speaker list soon.
I don't have anything to back it up, but I have a feeling there will be some integrations or aquisitions between link and arbitrum.

I just wish they had their release cycles come sooner so they could push out FSS/CCIP/staking, but they have to be extremely security conscious since there are now 1500+ integrations that controls billions of dollars.

[Anonymous No.50565682]

>>50565560
>selling the bottom
I bet you only buy tops and eat bananas without peeling them.

[Anonymous No.50565900]

>>50564687
>someone is going after the team at smartcon
Hahaha nothing is going to happen.

[Anonymous No.50565941]

>>50562006
feb 2023 will be 5 years of me bag holding this crap

[Anonymous No.50565944]

Linkies couldn't let go off their emotional bias and got fucked as a consequence kekek. You guys got lucky that's it, you're not smart or geniuses. If you truly deserved the wealth you wouldn't have fucked up the last bull run. You even had a massive up on 99% of crypto peeps if you got in under a dollar and still you fumbled everything. Get fucked losers

[Anonymous No.50566007]

>>50562006
5 years and the only thing to show for it is sergey weighing an extra 50 pounds

[Anonymous No.50566012]

>>50562756
>>50563283

I think he can afford to hire a couple intimidating niggers to stand nearby

[Anonymous No.50566115]

The hyperledger anon tossed the crumbs for the orbiting ducks waiting in the wings
The hyperledger private chains have no need of a third party to interlink, so the token is not needed there
The permissioned hyperledger have their own private keepers. It’s another nothing burger so-called, and hopium to boot
You don’t need a bloated half baked middleware vapor ware philosophy major’s obvious scam to taint the hyper ledger, as the rogue anons go ballistic watching the dumps steepening.
The rogue anons will be thirsty for blood on Christmas Eve when staking is still just two more weeks
Not even lifetime free Big Macs for every ico anon can satisfy the deep hunger to make it, becoming bloodthirsty knowing the yacht party will never happen
Machinsky laughs at your miserable fate, as you bleed out Sats like so many shit coins before that you swore it was different this time but it wasn’t. Don’t tempt fate

[Anonymous No.50566203]

>>50565645
I just hope that guy who dresses up as the pink wojak shows up again in the networking channel.

[Anonymous No.50566324]

>>50566203

[Anonymous No.50566446]

>>50566324

[Anonymous No.50566665]

>>50563205
So they better do something or else you won't do anything?

Easy to see why they've managed to produce nothing for years given that threat.

[Anonymous No.50566729]

>>50566324

[Anonymous No.50566832]

>>50562006
I'll just leave this here…

[Anonymous No.50566873]

Never sold any of my 120,000 LINK stack
Also I am the original “It’s happening tonight” poster

https://youtu.be/KzWjpjnRf-s

Video for sentimental reasons
Probably 99% of nuLINKers never seen it before

[Anonymous No.50566929]

>>50565941
Kek. Same. I honestly expected triple digits by now. But
>don't underestimate how long the market can take to figure out what you know

[Anonymous No.50567384]

>>50566873
I remember anon, it is actually fucked how long it's been. Some of the OC people were creating back in 2018 was awesome. Remember this shit?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9D9rz3-bDNk
Original guy deleted the channel.

[Anonymous No.50567414]

>>50562006
Any New York fags on? I wanna go butt like York has vax mandates

[Anonymous No.50567618]

>>50567414
SmartCon itself doesn’t seem to have any bullshit vaccine requirements. The website says something about complying with New York’s general rules. Don’t tell me New York is still forcing every business to still require it?

[Anonymous No.50567622]

>>50566929
If you had told me that by 2022 we’d be at 6€ now I’d have laughed in your face. I hoped I could retire by now or at least be comfortable knowing Link would have been triple digits. Oh well

[Anonymous No.50567702]

>>50565560
Try 5 years. And it's still the reason why we were able to have the defi bullrun.

[Anonymous No.50568459]

>>50567414
>>50567618
Do you think Sergey is vaxxed like the cattle who got vaxxed for a donut?

[Anonymous No.50568476]

>>50566324

<3

[Anonymous No.50568523]

>>50562924
One thing I learnt was that for some reason, Sergey believes in single, big hits. In 2019 there was complete silence for months, then suddenly he unexpectly announced go-live and multiple partnerships and developments, every week there were new breaking news after MONTHS of silence prior to that.

The price exploded of course, and I think we will be seeing the same thing as well. BTC is a third of its ATH, so if LINK hits $17-20 and then trades from there with BTC that should already be ok, though I expect it could also hit $30-40 and then trade with BTC, which would translate to $90-120 if BTC hits 65k again.

[Anonymous No.50568548]

>>50568459
Honestly? I think he probably is. He’s got all the WEF connections. Ari is a mask cuck. Chainlink literally has a Head of ESG guy. Don’t kid yourselves, Chainlink is closer to “them” than they are with us.

[Anonymous No.50568589]

>>50568459
all I know is his dad is a redpilled antivaxxer

[Anonymous No.50568706]

>>50563691
Yeah that's the fun part. It's just bots and pajeets spamming eachothers fudding new fags. Any newfag worth a dime will figure things out soon enough so I guess the bots & pajeets poetically fulfill a useful role after all.

[Anonymous No.50568748]

>>50565645
>fidelity talk
comfy

[Anonymous No.50568887]

>>50568523
It does seem to be his style, but fucking hell the thing that pisses me off is his timing has been absolutely abysmal lately. Releasing staking as we’re knee deep into a bear market and some really uncertain economic conditions is just cruel. They really couldn’t have done this a year ago? Just come on.

[Anonymous No.50568915]

>>50567384
I miss content like this. It's rare nowadays.

[Anonymous No.50569180]

>>50568523
Not really. We've been piecemeal delivered things that should have been dropped at once for years now. Whitepapers, staggered releases, delays etc etc.

[Anonymous No.50569198]

>I've posted crumbs
MUH BREADCRUMBS

[Anonymous No.50569497]

>>50566665
kek, it started off so well

[Anonymous No.50569996]

>>50566873
To this day this is still my favorite LINK meme, I haven't seen it posted on /biz/ in a long fucking time. Your story checks out.

[Anonymous No.50570005]

>>50565645
Did we watch the same fidelity talk? He literally had nothing to talk about

[Anonymous No.50570385]

>>50563195
>copy pasta hopium while the fat man dumps
Eth foundation is inherently corrupt
they are rather telling some of their inner circle buddies (uniswap maker) to crank out an oracle before giving chainlinklabs an inch

Only way forward for chainlinklabs, abandon eth

[Anonymous No.50570515]

>>50565941
cram a string up his ass and he'll float away like the fucking blip that that he is.

eat a big mac with Sirgay, fucking no thanks, as he fucks price action for another 2 years.

[Anonymous No.50570572]

>>50568548
this.

"link marines" think they are community members (fucking retards).

cl community is fortune 100 organizations and banks not basement dwelling wierdos trolling /biz.

[Anonymous No.50570718]

>>50563841
this is true
we won't have time to figure out the implications of what they announce either

[Anonymous No.50570774]

>>50566324
haha wut

[Anonymous No.50571340]

>>50568887
Sergey did not care about the token price until it was too late...

[Anonymous No.50571791]

>>50570572
Can you show me any on chain evidence of just one single bank or company using link?

[Anonymous No.50572202]

>>50562941
kek

[Anonymous No.50572715]

>>50571791
Wanna talk about the Citigroup report?