[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 598 KB, 800x534, 1509354441902.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5054883 No.5054883 [Reply] [Original]

Ok we gotta adress this:
Who makes all these fucking wojacks?
Is any board this wojacky except for maybe /fit/?

>> No.5054903

Nolinkers, who travelled back in time

>> No.5054919

>>5054883
Wojack isn't that hard to make.

>> No.5054940
File: 23 KB, 397x450, bideo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5054940

/v/ has recently become obsessed with brainlet wojak edits

>> No.5054961
File: 17 KB, 394x450, stackmorket.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5054961

>>5054883
I made this one a few days ago. Feel free to use it!

>> No.5054978

>>5054961
Its pretty good. I actually will.

>> No.5054983
File: 27 KB, 488x463, clapjak.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5054983

>>5054978
Thanks, anon!

>> No.5055012

>>5054961
That filename

>> No.5055665
File: 7 KB, 211x239, images_9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5055665

There slowjacs and there from bant

>> No.5055674
File: 30 KB, 645x729, 1508779517475.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5055674

>> No.5055682
File: 11 KB, 236x253, 1506246918010.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5055682

disturbedjaks are better

>> No.5055775

I love the drooling wojak that drools so much it needs a snorkel to breathe. I think that is biz exclusive and quite the meta meme

>> No.5055786
File: 123 KB, 399x404, 1513148828835.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5055786

>>5054883
What about /r9k/? I'm not its citizen, though.

>> No.5056187

>>5054883
they just seem to appear out of nowhere

>> No.5056232

State funded goons are making them.You can thank the CIA for this.Thats all im gonna say.

>> No.5056346
File: 615 KB, 800x534, fixed.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5056346

>>5054883
>signature on meme
No, we have to address THIS.