/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.50239378]

Trying to clean up my poorfolio, any tips on what to consolidate into? I’m thinking either:
>HBAR
>FTM
>ICP

[Anonymous No.50239412]

>>50239378
I saw your thread the other day, I'm the anon that has only 2 of your coins. I'd say go for icy pee or maybe ftm, but keep some of your mtv as a moonshot

[Anonymous No.50239419]

>>50239378
ngmi fart-knocker

[Anonymous No.50239456]

BTC, ADA and KDA

[Anonymous No.50239521]

>>50239412
Thanks anon, I appreciate your help and actual words of advice more than you know. This board is so trash 90% of the time lol although it’s gotten a lot better since the crash

[Anonymous No.50239558]

>>50239378
>FTM
Sell while it's still above $0.01 or stay poooooooooor with your poooooooorfolio
I bet you are also pro-life kek

[Anonymous No.50239563]

>>50239378
>Trying to clean up my poorfolio, any tips on what to consolidate into? I’m thinking either:
>HBAR
>FTM
>ICP

[Anonymous No.50239599]

>I want to shill my shitcoin
>but I will only get laughed at
>oh I know! I'll put genuine shit like btc and eth!
top kek

[Anonymous No.50239672]

>>50239599
This is my genuine portfolio anon

[Anonymous No.50239697]

>>50239672
you can't be serious. How did you fall for MTV?

[Anonymous No.50239706]

>>50239378
hbar only

[Anonymous No.50239714]

>>50239558
>>50239563
What do you guys suggest instead?

[Anonymous No.50239744]

>>50239697
L1 that hadn’t pumped and had a decent amount of support , not like I put a ton of money into it

[Anonymous No.50239797]

>>50239714
Theres a concerted effort to FUD people out of their ICP positions.
Its very tiresome.
Honest with you here; I dont really give a shit if you or other anons buy ICP. I buy because I see the writing on the wall and can look ahead enough to see the applications extending beyond the stuff we see today.
Its hard to predict the future, but its always obvious in hindsight.

[Anonymous No.50240025]

>>50239797
what does icp do

[Anonymous No.50240084]

>>50239797
This. ICP is the guaranteed play for next run. I can't tell you if it will be a 10x or a 100x, all I can tell you is it will take off next bull run. The tokenomics and actually fundamentals of this coin are way too good. Ideally it drops to $1 so I can load up, but at this point I think we gotta be happy buying now.

[Anonymous No.50240093]

>>50239378
sell everything into crv and spell

[Anonymous No.50240178]

>>50240025
Full stacks on chains, tamper proof software
Serve web content directly from smart contracts
Integration with other blockchains with no bridges
Run front ends for all chains
Solve de-platforming risks for applications
Scale other protocols like ETH and others
Add smart contract to BTC, doge, and other non smart contract plattorm
On chain Governance clients for other protocols, enterprises, and governments
Build user owned and controlled social networks in which each account is smart contract and can be moved to different dAPPS by the user.
NFTs live entirely on-chain (files and assets) and can react to the outside world via https request
No need for Oracles as the protocol can communicate directly with Web 2 and run the data through consensus

You could literally build and host an exchange with the complexity of binance, natively, on ICP. It can compete with legacy exchanges.

[Anonymous No.50241054]

>>50239714
Hbar is the best l1 with massive usecase imminent and staking in unironically two weeks. Ftm has no future, too many plebs got dumped on. Icp is literal amateur hour. Basically a YouTube no one uses, max views for a video like 3k most with less than 10, and an iMessage they use to spam trx. Keep in mind it costs icp to upload a video.

[Anonymous No.50241072]

>>50241054
Forgot to mention icp’s massive inflation forever.

[Anonymous No.50241150]

>inb4 Hbar inflation
50b coin cap. Full release schedule over 15 years. Also the treasury will supplement staking.

50-19 = 31/50/13 = 4.7% inflation for 13 years then none. This assumes nothing for staking which is not true. Icp is minimum 10% annual inflation. Fuck that.

[Anonymous No.50241528]

>>50241150
>>50241072
>not knowing about reverse gas

[Anonymous No.50242308]

>>50239378
>0.06
that one.

[Anonymous No.50242339]

>>50240025
Everything

[Anonymous No.50244338]

yes i agree, adding hbar right now is the smart thing to do before it goes parabolic as a result of the hbar foundation's efforts in building a sustainable digital economy on hedera

[Anonymous No.50244387]

>>50244338
you guys finally switched it up a little bit congrats that half billion being put to good use

[Anonymous No.50244668]

>>50239599
That's my assets anon, what have you done to bring my coins here? I silently staked them on freeway.

[Anonymous No.50244924]

>>50240093
This is the most insane suggestion I feel, you think spell will seriously recover after everything? Only reason I still have it is because I’m a burger who has it stuck on gate.io after they stopped NA services

[Anonymous No.50244935]

>>50241054
Isn’t the fact that ICP even has a YouTube clone up and running impressive in itself, what other block chains have that?

[Anonymous No.50244972]

>>50240084
can you explain what is the basis for it taking off next run

[Anonymous No.50245423]

>ICP: its a fucking rug pull. get over it /boz
>FTM: its an HBAR clone

The only choice is HBAR. Their foundation is the only one actually allocating funds to bring in new developers to the chain

[Anonymous No.50245481]

>>50244668
Centralised feels.

[Anonymous No.50245542]

>>50239378
All in MTV. Wagmi

[Anonymous No.50245648]

>>50239378
Genuine question, what drives a human being to spend money on random shit like “MTV” or “KDA” or whatever the hell “SPELL” is? I understand BTC and stuff, but this is just made up bullshit even sillier than what doge was. Is it autism? FOMO?

[Anonymous No.50246089]

>>50245481
Both defi and cefi has advantages and disadvantages anon. Combining them together is also a unique one. As long as it has source of revenue, you wont feel like what happened to celsius, nexo and voyager cringe anon.

[Anonymous No.50246626]

>>50244935
SHILLER OF ICP

[Anonymous No.50246638]

>>50245423
Lol CLONE?? FUCK

[Anonymous No.50246825]

>>50239378
> Hbar
Meh, most people into this chain are into it because they think it's full of either current or future corporate adoption, hard to believe. Not any spectacular tech breakthroughs, it can scale but it's also absurdly centralized (like any DAG that can scale) and has a few tech nuances like aBFT.

> Ftm
I think their nakamoto coefficient is like 3, it means 3 nodes colluding can take over the network, for comparison BTC's coefficient is around 7k

> ICP
Solid, they gotta work on decentralization tho. Problem is mostly that people hate it but I'm expecting that to change by next cycle.

[Anonymous No.50248000]

>>50239714
I'd go for long-term investments like Railgun which delivers on-chain privacy to users and shielded balances making the crypto ecosystem safer.

[Anonymous No.50248093]

>>50246825
>I think their nakamoto coefficient is like 3, it means 3 nodes colluding can take over the network, for comparison BTC's coefficient is around 7k
this isnt exactly true. Fantom's aBFT consensus makes a trade-off for network security. It is easier than other networks for nodes to collude to slow/stop transactions BUT it is much harder for nodes to perform a double-spend. If i remember correctly Michael Kong said 34% of nodes colluding could slow the network but 67% are needed to perform a malicious transaction or double spend. Whether thats a good or bad tradeoff idk but they seem to think the economic incentive to not slow the network is enough.

[Anonymous No.50248375]

>>50239714
The one with working product like CryptoXpress and Ebox are worth the investments. Obviously, not a financial advice

[Anonymous No.50248412]

>>50245648
Mostly a mix of FOMO, disposable income, and being young enough to not really care what I threw $100 at. Spell seemed like a good play at the time before Dani exposed himself as a con-man freak but now I’m stuck with it until gate.io lets me withdraw

[Anonymous No.50248452]

>>50246825
FTM’s coefficient is fixed with the addition of more validators(which they have been increasing slowly but surely) though correct? Genuinely asking, I appreciate your actual advice and thought out reply though anon, actually helpful and useful instead of accusing me of shilling some coin I have $100 like a lot of people assume lol

[Anonymous No.50248467]

>>50248093
See >>50248452
what do you think anon?

[Anonymous No.50248563]

>>50248467
>>50248452
my guess is that in fantom's case the nakamoto coefficient will always be the lowest number of entities that control more than 34% of the validating power. It would increase as the network becomes more decentralized. You can look at the size of the validators here if you're interested
https://explorer.fantom.network/staking#/staking

[Anonymous No.50248870]

>>50248375
Is it good?
>>50248412
What the fuck is that anon?
>>50248452
>>50248563
Lieee

[Anonymous No.50248936]

>>50239378
>>FTM
>>ICP
both

[Anonymous No.50248966]

>>50239378
Projects that will do big in next cycle

UNI / LOOKS / AR / PNK / LINK / ETH / AVAX / ROSE

[Anonymous No.50249227]

>>50248870
It's all good anon, xpress is wanting to become the first bank built in metaverse. Ebox is available on moonbeam and moonriver. Multi-chain is the future.

[Anonymous No.50249269]

>>50239378
Sell all, buy only Bitcoin

[Anonymous No.50249360]

>>50248936
>perma ngmi
I can only assume that you want op to fail with this suggestion. Kek