What happened to the 2020 LINK buzz?

[Anonymous No.50227443]

Everything has been a dead, played meme since summer 2020. Unironically the last time LINK was at ATH on the BTC and ETH pairs. But Ian Keane, Yorke Rhodes, Wolpert never get mentioned anymore. What about the brazilian Sergey wannabee? Steve Ellis? It's not on Chainlink twitter either, it's like all this shit disappeared without a trace

>Steve Ellis is CTO and no one has seen him in years
>Ian Keane discussed Oracle integration in 2020
>Ribeiro ran a Chainlink startups program
>John Wolpert was supposedly running a Coke bottling project with Chainlink and Baseline
>Diem integration died, talent poached for what?
>SWIFT integration is?...
>Yorke Rhodes and Microsoft projects
>Google developer advocate used to appear all over the place, disappeared

What the fuck happened to the actual projects? I'm so sick of reading about shitty BSC/SOL/L1 integrations for some 200 user game no one plays

[Anonymous No.50227507]

>>50227443
Crypto is over anon

[Anonymous No.50227551]

>>50227443
Idgaf about what OP is saying he's clearly a fag. But the hexagon has pulled me in, the more I think about link and how fucking important it is the more schizo I become. Send help bros.

[Anonymous No.50227757]

>>50227551
Get help, asap

[Anonymous No.50227785]

>>50227443
It’s common knowledge that 90% of LINK OG’s came from /pol/, and are thus unironic Nazis and extremely racist. This is evident when you look at the chats whenever Chainlink presents at conferences such as consensus or smartcon. It’s always N word this, N word that.

I personally don’t want to put my money into a project like that and keep that sort of company. Moreover, I question the intelligence of people who shill LINK given their backwards and racist political views.

[Anonymous No.50227967]

>>50227443
Welcome to the narrative retard, why do you think all this shit? Because none of that shit mattered at the time anyway, it was fud from the beginning. The network has barely even gotten off the ground newfag

[Anonymous No.50229345]

>>50227443
it's because eth failed to scale, no enterprise is going to use blockchain unless it solves the trilemma, so instead of chainlink just focusing on doing their specialty they've had to try and help scale eth

[Anonymous No.50229461]

LINK hit basically everyone's price targets, silly
Imagine LUNC hitting a dollar and then you FOMO in

[Anonymous No.50229911]

>>50227443
These were all obvious fake partnerships. They didn't "disappear", they were fake. If you didn't notice this and dump your bags at ath, you have low IQ and don't deserve to make it.

There were literally anons spamming daily explaining how the partnerships were obviously fake. They were right. You were wrong. You're down 95% vs ETH since

[Anonymous No.50229969]

>>50229911

[Anonymous No.50229995]

>>50227443
Outplayed by kenshi

[Anonymous No.50230022]

>>50229969

[Anonymous No.50230278]

>>50229911
Just a cheerful little English tip, anon, we would say "down 19x vs ETH" rather than "down 95% vs ETH". Absolutely excellent English otherwise, though, near native.

[Anonymous No.50230283]

>>50227443
>Pussy sip ID
kek

[Anonymous No.50230303]

>>50230022
why does this keep getting posted?

[Anonymous No.50230368]

>>50230278
Really? Great tip, thanks. I've also noticed you use phrases like "industry leading oracle solution" or "fundamentally bullish" to describe steaming piles of dead freefalling shit. Or even things like "brilliant innovator" to describe fat bearded Russian men who enjoy repeating themselves. English is so confusing.

[Anonymous No.50230666]

>>50227443
thanks just sold stack

[Anonymous No.50230807]

>>50230368
Wow you seem very upset, you know you could just filter LINK threads in 10 seconds and you would never have to deal with them again? So easy, but you choose the hard road, to obsess over Chainlink instead.
I respect that.

[Anonymous No.50230826]

>>50227443
So it seems you finally realized all these things were larps.

[Anonymous No.50230929]

>>50230807
judging by the picture he posted, I'm guessing he's a fed up linkie, pretty much like you

[Anonymous No.50230943]

>>50230929
>he's a fed up linkie
funny how /biz/ was full of those even when Link was thrashing the entire market haha lol

[Anonymous No.50230948]

>>50230929
I'm not fed up bro I'm having a great time! Hope you're having a great time too! :)
just remember you can always filter things you don't like, no need to be unhappy about anything.

[Anonymous No.50230956]

>>50230943
I'm still comfy.

[Anonymous No.50231109]

>>50227443
>>50227757
>>50227967
>>50229911
>>50229995
>>50230368
>>50230807
>>50230929
>>50230826
really organic thread guys
nexo is insolvent lmao
s and h

[Anonymous No.50231111]

>>50230929
Kek exactly, pic worked as intended. Just talking shit about this cunt of a token.

>>50230948
Hey look, it's a spiritually awakened mpnk guru browsing 4chan biz. Full of advice for everyone.

[Anonymous No.50231124]

>>50231111
>Full of advice for everyone
lol that's so rich coming from a fudder :^)

checked btw

[Anonymous No.50231151]

>>50231124
I'm making statements here not giving recommendations with smiley faces to try lull anons into thinking I'm "based". Reeks of false confidence no? I'm just bored as fuck and have lost the last iota of patience, pay no mind.

[Anonymous No.50231156]

>>50231151
>I'm making statements here not giving recommendations
holy pilpul

[Anonymous No.50231160]

>>50230948
why would a holder filter a thread about his token? you don't make sense

[Anonymous No.50231164]

>>50231160
Why would a holder call his holding a "steaming piles of dead freefalling shit"?

[Anonymous No.50231182]

>>50231151
I'm not sorry that I'm happy, anon.

[Anonymous No.50231187]

>>50231164
because he's fed up? for example, I am a holder and I have no problem calling LINK a steaming pile of shit, the performance has been atrocious objectively speaking
we're arguing in circles right now

[Anonymous No.50231195]

>>50231187
>because he's fed up?
He also says Link is not fundamentally bullish.
Why would anyone hold anything that is not fundamentally bullish?
You're not making any sense lol

[Anonymous No.50231206]

>>50231195
because after holding for 4 years, an emotional dependence is inevitable formed, making selling extremely difficult
t. I'm going through this right now, perpetually afraid to sell because I was brainwashed the singularity could happen literally at any moment

[Anonymous No.50231207]

>>50231187
Are you working on other parts of your life? If you know LINK is inevitable, if you know it's undervalued, then why not just take that knowledge and run with it? Buy more, take your eyes off crypto if you can't buy more, get fit, eat better, eat fermented foods, find other things that your reward pathways will enjoy.
All in LINK and gawping at charts and counting down the months or years until $1k is a miserable torture that is entirely self-inflicted. You have a choice, anon, you always have so much choice. Personally I'm working on getting into the best physical shape of my life.

[Anonymous No.50231210]

>>50231156
Jfc it's always jews this conspiracy that with you brainlets. Ever heard of shooting the shit? You guys are so on edge lately. Fud for fun is not a new concept, you've just become insecure. Clear difference between giving life advice and just saying "haha link bad". Low iq anon, get it together

>>50231182
I think you're just trying to come off that way. It's the smiley faces, condescension, and exclamation marks. That's why I'm being a smart ass

[Anonymous No.50231220]

>>50231206
You're doing mental backflips.
Anyone who says an asset is not fundamentally bullish does not hold said asset.

>>50231210
>uses pilpul
>accuses others of taking things too seriously
lmao

[Anonymous No.50231232]

>>50231207
>Are you working on other parts of your life?
yes, but that is irrelevant, we're talking about LINK's performance and it's failed integrations
>If you know LINK is inevitable, if you know it's undervalued
I don't know anything anymore
>Buy more, take your eyes off crypto if you can't buy more, get fit, eat better, eat fermented foods, find other things that your reward pathways will enjoy.
alright, but this is a LINK thread? Am I not allowed to be dissatisfied with my investment?
>a miserable torture that is entirely self-inflicted
the only part we agree in
>>50231220
>accept my premises
I'm holding LINK for 4 years, I am currently bearish, do with that information what you will

[Anonymous No.50231243]

>>50231232
>>accept my premises
lmao, "people invest in things they think are fundamentally bullish" is not my premise, champ.

[Anonymous No.50231250]

>>50231243
perceptions change you know
when I bought I was bullish, my perception has changed

[Anonymous No.50231258]

>>50231250
Imagine spending all this time and effort trying to defend your headcanon around another anon's feelings.

[Anonymous No.50231259]

>>50231187
I've noticed essentially every single argument on biz surrounding LINK now is frustrated holders either memeing or just being honest and letting off steam clashing with the persistent round-the-clock legion of muhrines who are in fullblown outright denial to the point they can't even consider the price performance or think about the world outside LINK, presumably because as you said an ego and related mythos has built up around their identity and LINK in their minds. It's all just boredom but the hyperdefensive vitriol and conspiracies about literally everyone posting in biz who doesn't have a Sergey bobblehead and a cubic object up their rectum being a bulgarian jew is dialled up immediately. I like to think that's just a different coping mechanism though and we'll all come together in the end again, just seems like the deaf die-hards are more unhinged. I hope so anyway

[Anonymous No.50231264]

>>50231232
I'm not saying you have to pretend to be happy with LINK's performance over the last couple of years, but I'm saying you have a lot of control over how much of an impact LINK's performance has on your mental health.
One of the reasons I'm on a high at the moment is that there is tons of shit going on in crypto, unrelated to LINK, that has me excited right now. And I will move a small proportion of my folio into that stuff and just generally forget about LINK until SmartCon. LINK will still be 80% of my folio, and I am still a complete fanboy of it, but I find other things to do.

[Anonymous No.50231268]

>>50231259
It's very simple: if you claim an asset is not "fundamentally bullish", then you simply do not hold said asset.
No need to write entire blogs lol

[Anonymous No.50231275]

>>50227443
The price happened. Just like the Qtard larp on /pol/ it was all talk no action. Digital snake oil if you will

[Anonymous No.50231298]

>>50231258
You have more posts than me, why are you trying so hard to set the narrative here?
>>50231259
agreed
>>50231264
a totally reasonable post, thank you anon, but I just wanted to vent about LINK's pathetic performance in here, this is the only place I can do it either way
>>50231268
yeah keep repeating yourself like a broken record, that will make me feel bullish for sure

[Anonymous No.50231316]

>>50231298
100% of your posts are about defending what another anon MAY have meant.
What are you doing.

[Anonymous No.50231317]

>>50231298
that's fair, anon, there's no doubt if you'd told me 5 years ago that in 2022 LINK would be $5, I would have laughed in your face.

[Anonymous No.50231332]

>>50231316
yeah, but I'm essentially using myself as an example to justify his potential motives
just focus on me instead of resorting to every logical fallacy in the book
>>50231317
>if you'd told me 5 years ago that in 2022 LINK would be $5, I would have laughed
pretty much how I feel, yeah

[Anonymous No.50231351]

>>50231332
>I'm essentially using myself as an example to justify his potential motives
Do you believe Link is "fundamentally bullish"?

[Anonymous No.50231357]

>>50227443

I love LINK but there are other oracle projects if this is really the tech you're into.

[Anonymous No.50231368]

>>50231351
I used to, the constant underperforming of LINK, crypto being filled with bullshit scams, CeFi imploding and DeFi getting rekt, paired along with the broader macro economic conditions, I don't know anymore, LINK's meteoric rise doesn't seem like a certainty as it used to 2-3 years ago

[Anonymous No.50231373]

People are just sick of the horrible performance of link and the only users of the network being shit NFT and defi scams. To top it off Sergey will release 50 million extra Link to ''incentivize'' staking diluting our bags even more. Also link has turned into a Qanon support group where every sort of criticism is dismissed with ''bulgarian nexo fudder''.

[Anonymous No.50231382]

>>50231373
>Sergey will release 50 million extra Link
Yeah but at the same time he's gonna lock up 75 million Link.

[Anonymous No.50231385]

>>50231368
So you are still fundamentally bullish about Link, got it.

>crypto being filled with bullshit scams, CeFi imploding and DeFi getting rekt
These are all reasons to be bullish about Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.50231388]

>>50231382
why are you lying? these 75 million will come from cold wallets, they are already out of circulation, he won't be subtracting them from the circulating supply

[Anonymous No.50231389]

>>50231382
So net only 25 million of current supply will be locked up, got it kek

[Anonymous No.50231397]

5 years of this.

fuck sergey and his lies.

[Anonymous No.50231400]

>>50231385
>These are all reasons to be bullish about Chainlink.

These are the major users of the link network that are imploding lmao. Yes very bullish indeed.

[Anonymous No.50231402]

>>50231385
no, wtf is wrong with your reading comprehension
a bet on Chainlink is essentially a leveraged bet on the entire industry, if the industry is total shit why should I be bullish? Chainlink does not exist in a vacuum, it's in the fucking name
>Chain + link

[Anonymous No.50231413]

>>50231389
>WHY IS SERGEY INFLATING BY 50 MILLION TOKENS???
>I CAN'T BELIEVE HE HAS THE AUDACITY TO DEFLATE SUPPLY BY 25 MILLION TOKENS!!

You're literally that Jew allowance joke.

[Anonymous No.50231417]

>>50231373
I mean in our defense the Bulgarians and their third world employees have been absolutely incessant recently.

[Anonymous No.50231420]

The main point is is that everyone is sick of Link except a few bagholders who still believe in their dream life coming true. So of course they strongly stand by their thesis of link exploding in 2022/2023. The rest of the link holders have moved on with their lives, so the buzz is gone.

[Anonymous No.50231423]

>>50231400
>These are the major users of the link network that are imploding lmao.
Yes, because of things like not using proof of reserve.

>>50231402
>no, wtf is wrong with your reading comprehension
So you're not fundamentally bullish on Link?

[Anonymous No.50231431]

>>50231413
Which completely destroys all the link hopium about a massive supply shock. Linkies were spamming about all 400 million circulating Link being locked up lmao

[Anonymous No.50231432]

>>50231423
for the nth time, no not anymore, are you going to start reading my posts properly or am I just wasting time here

[Anonymous No.50231439]

>>50231431
You do realize 75 million tokens is just for one single feed, right?

>>50231432
>not anymore
Then you're either a cuck for still holding, or a paid fudder for still posting.

[Anonymous No.50231454]

>>50231439
only a literal moron deals in absolutes
have fun arguing in circles all day every day with "paid fudders" and "cuck holders"

[Anonymous No.50231465]

>>50231454
>only a literal moron deals in absolutes
Literally the only reason to invest in anything ever, is if you're fundamentally bullish on it.
Anything else is pilpul.

[Anonymous No.50231500]

>>50231465
>broken record, ad nauseam
fyi, nobody is getting convinced from your posts, you're unironically doing a terrible job at shilling

[Anonymous No.50231514]

>>50231500
You implied earlier itt that you're still holding Link (despite being fundamentally bearish) due to "emotional dependence": >>50231206
You're literally a cuck.

[Anonymous No.50231519]

>>50231500
>doing a terrible job at shilling
Anon, I'm calling you a cuck for still holding. I'm doing the exact opposite of shilling.

[Anonymous No.50231521]

>>50231514
just to clarify, am I pilpulling, or am I being a cuck?

[Anonymous No.50231528]

Not selling.
Living my life in the meantime, that’s all you have to do.

[Anonymous No.50231533]

>>50231519
I might be a cuck then, whatever helps you sleep at night
>double posting
at least I'm not an unhinged sperglord, like you, attacking anyone who doesn't share your unfounded optimism after 4 fucking years
bye and good luck

[Anonymous No.50231558]

>>50227785
you literally sold me on Link wtf, gonna buy in right now I love esoteric racist coins

[Anonymous No.50231597]

>>50231521
>implying these are mutually exclusive
Pilpullikg cuck

[Anonymous No.50231652]

>>50231397
19-22 isn't five years

[Anonymous No.50231685]

Your question is mainly around where is the enterprise use? There are still things bubbling along in the background and I believe we're going to see a big enough announcement at smartcon that the team delayed their event to ensure it's ready in time.

You should also ask what has happened to all of those projects? As an example, things are still progressing at hyperledger with direct relation to chainlink:
https://wiki.hyperledger.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=62241904
and they're being referenced around the FMSIG
https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/CMSIG/FMSIG+Mortgage+Industry+Subgroup

Avivah Litan has been a big contributor to educating about decentralized oracles but you can only lead a horse to water.

The space has been slow to grow since it is costly for enterprise to deploy and risky compared to existing traditional technology. DeFi is serving as a proving ground, but the smell of rugpulls and greed has tainted the space and slowed development. A lack of enterprise use forced a wind-down in the azure (microsoft) blockchain space.

Don't forget that the former google CEO joined chainlink. Maybe there was a reason for the advocate posts?

[Anonymous No.50231758]

Here is a breadcrumb for you all as well. Things have never really quietened down for Chainlink. There is a web of long drawn connections linking these events together over time.

https://www.vox.com/recode/2022/6/9/23160588/eric-schmidt-americas-frontier-fund-google-alphabet-tech-government-revolving-door

Do you all recall the old crumbs about the Department of Defense?

[Anonymous No.50231865]

>>50227443
It's over bros, LINK is not new tech, a hidden gem, or a coming 10-100x. LINK is mainstream and is in Twitter roasties bio. It’s a corporate entity now, so Sergey has to dump another 750k LINK to hire talent managers and diversity officers. LINK hasn’t been the biz token for over 2 years now. Just sell anons... i-i-iit’s over. It was a good ride.

[Anonymous No.50231869]

>>50230303
it's being used to tag threads of note for a certain party, in a similar way that on /pol/ glowniggers post the 'sneed' copypasta to mark threads for later analysis.

[Anonymous No.50231887]

>>50227443
I’m pretty certain people wanted exposure to defi but didn’t know how to reliably get it in a liquid market. Link was the only option to most us buyers at the time.

[Anonymous No.50231923]

>>50227785

I thought NPCs were cleared out of biz by this stage of the market?

[Anonymous No.50231961]

>>50231652
>19
everyone from 2017 made it and i am stuck with newfags I am just gonna kms

[Anonymous No.50232067]

how do you fags not recognize OP's writing style and the literal 100s of concern trolling threads just like this that he has made at this point. over and over and over and over again

[Anonymous No.50232093]

>>50231685
The fact that Eric Schmidt is risking his reputation with link tells me there is more happening than we are told. Guys like him are steering the future, not just passengers.

[Anonymous No.50232126]

>>50227443
Hopefully good times are coming back soon.

[Anonymous No.50232148]

>>50231865
Not sure LINK is going the same path LUNA did. Not a hodler of the token though

[Anonymous No.50232168]

>>50232126
I'm so excited for you kiddos

[Anonymous No.50232170]

>>50232093
>Eric Schmidt is risking his reputation with link
>Literally hasn't tweeted about it even a single time
>Follows a bunch of NFT fags but not a SINGLE chainlink account
>Every public reference is as vague as possible
He is distancing himself as much as is humanly possible without outright denouncing them.

[Anonymous No.50232181]

>>50231423
I'm bullish on LINK but not holding might just hold on to MATIC, ETH and EGLD whilst placing FLD and TEAM on my radar but also bought RIDE, MEX and KDA.

[Anonymous No.50232193]

>>50231385
DeFi will see some good lights again.

[Anonymous No.50232197]

>>50232170
Is he going to denounce them at smartcon? I’m worried, bros. What if he gets on stage and his whole speech is just “Link Is shit”

[Anonymous No.50232214]

>>50232170
you ain't gonna get anywhere in life with a negative attitude like that sonny Jim

[Anonymous No.50232268]

>>50232126
realistically speaking we’ll probably have to suffer for 3 years at least

[Anonymous No.50232270]

>>50232170
>Official advisor for only one crypto - link
>Keynote speaker at smartcon

Yeah he's really distancing himself from link

[Anonymous No.50232289]

>>50232197
>Sergey decides he is not betraying us enough
>Pays Eric Schmidt a huge amount of link to betray us
I'm starting to paint a picture here

[Anonymous No.50232298]

>>50232197
He's going to say
>Blockchains are a technology which may or may not be important at some point in the near or distant future. And of all the blockchain companies, Chain Link is certainly one of them. Thank you.

[Anonymous No.50232313]

>>50232289
The 50 million LINK is literally just being paid to Eric to fud LINK.

[Anonymous No.50232843]

>>50232170
>Every public reference is as vague as possible
He literally and directly talked fondly of Chainlink even before he became the official advisor

https://twitter.com/kofinas/status/1460365062103781384

[Anonymous No.50232889]

It's mildly amusing, watching the desperate attempts to fud Link, this close to staking, CCIP and ent. abstraction layer. They're really trying their best, you have to hand it to them.
>B..b.. but the price is low!
>B..b.. but staking won't happen/won't happen for you!
>Eric Schmidt hates Chainlink!
>Sergey Nazarov is trying to take all your money!

Honestly, I'll get more relief from getting rid of these clowns than I will from making it. Still, maybe one day I'll think back with fondness, though I doubt it

[Anonymous No.50233081]

>>50227443
Why can't you fags put your LINK in cold storage and forget about it?
What is there to discuss? We all know about the tech, we all know price action is bad now.
If you believe in LINK just do what this anon said >>50231207. Improve your career, get fit, read books, find cool hobbies, DCA if you can afford to. I know I am.
If you don't believe in LINK just sell and shut up.
This board is such a waste of time, it's comical at this point. Every single day there's a thread with the same replies. You're all supposed to be high IQ autists but you're literally arguing with other LINK holders larping as fudders. Or bots. I can't even tell at this point.
Get out, touch grass, read a book, watch a movie or even go visit another board. Unironically.

[Anonymous No.50233223]

>>50231685
Thanks anon, good reads. SmartCon needs to be a 'happening'

[Anonymous No.50233470]

>>50227443
>Steve Ellis is CTO and no one has seen him in years
>Diem integration died, talent poached for what?
steve with his latest employee, former diem cto, who co-authored hotstuff consensus and many breakthrough papers about BFT since the 90s, led vmware dlt research, h index of 60, diem was sold to a fed charter bank for 9 figures likely to be repurposed post cbdcs, she's a top cryptography prof at hebrew university of jerusalem and is now scaling up cl labs r&d with dozens of phds already active under her lead - and that's just her own new subdivision, then there's cachin, boneh (120 h index), zhang, etc and of course ambrose jerusalem

few realize how powerful my nigger steve truly is because he hides in the shadows but i'm keeping a close eye on him at all times, he's so cute bros

[Anonymous No.50233485]

never EVER doubt steve again op

[Anonymous No.50233516]

I'm still holding out hope that Chainlink will bring blockchain innovation to the gravel industry.

[Anonymous No.50233581]

>>50233470
>>50233485
dude looks more Chadlike with each passing year, God bless Steve

[Anonymous No.50233611]

>>50227443
I saw steve last summer in Paris at ethcc

[Anonymous No.50233712]

>>50227443
ITS LITERALLY BEEN SUPPRESSED BY CELSUIS PROTECTING ITS PONZI
CHAINLINK TRUSTED JEWS AND GOT JEWED
GAS GAS GAS

[Anonymous No.50233843]

>>50227443
Link is poo poo

[Anonymous No.50233888]

>>50231533
>attacking anyone who doesn't share your unfounded optimism after 4 fucking years
I'm not attacking anyone for losing faith in Chainlink, at all.

I'm just saying you're a whiny cuck if you stay invested in something even though you think it's no longer fundamentally bullish.

[Anonymous No.50233943]

>>50233485
Where can i find more info on steve

[Anonymous No.50234009]

>>50233888
>I'm not attacking you
>I'm just calling you a whiny cunt
unironically seek help

[Anonymous No.50234052]

>>50234009
I'm not attacking him for losing faith, I'm attacking him for whining about it instead of selling.
See, basic logic isn't THAT hard if you try a little.

[Anonymous No.50234149]

>>50231758
>Here is a breadcrumb
Unless you're an insider, it's not a breadcrumb. It's just a theory.
>Do you all recall the old crumbs about the Department of Defense?
Can you please share your theory, or link to article? Quite frankly, I don't find the article that you linked very convincing of anything about Link. It's just Schmidt doing business. That said, I'm a Link bagholder and am never selling, so I'm open to hearing your ideas.

[Anonymous No.50234167]

>>50234052
honestly Idgaf, I'm just pointing out ypur hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance kek
you're entitled your own opinions, and he is too btw

[Anonymous No.50234176]

>>50234167
>just pointing out ypur hypocrisy
But there is none.
I am attacking him, but not for losing faith like he said.

[Anonymous No.50234198]

>>50234176
kek you're not the sharpest tool in the shed right?

[Anonymous No.50234222]

>>50232843
>https://twitter.com/kofinas/status/1460365062103781384
What is he talking about, when he mentions the speed and latency issues? Is that a reference to how shitty Eth is? Seems like it lends credence to what some anons have postulated when they said that Link is waiting for the Eth Merge before they can release staking/CCIP.

[Anonymous No.50234229]

>>50234198
him:
>you're attacking me for losing faith

reality:
>I'm attacking him for still holding like a cuck despite losing faith, and whining about it

There's really no way to put this any clearer.

[Anonymous No.50234325]

>>50232197
dubs and this happens and LINK (ticker: LINK) moons to 1000 EOY

[Anonymous No.50234378]

>>50227443
I sold my 27k stack at $22, that was my age at the time and my exit price wish i was older

[Anonymous No.50234417]

>>50234229
23 posts ITT, the bear market must have hit this stinktard hard kek

[Anonymous No.50234462]

>>50234417
At least I'm talking about something I still believe in.
Imagine being such a massive cuck that you keep holding and constantly thinking about something you don't even believe in anymore.

It's like still paying for and thinking about a woman who doesn't fuck you anymore.

[Anonymous No.50234502]

>>50234462
Yes we must all just believe and everything will be ok right? kek

[Anonymous No.50234533]

>>50234502
>Yes we must all just believe
You should only hold what you fundamentally believe in, yes lel
Obviously.

[Anonymous No.50234613]

>>50234052
why tf would someone sell when Link is 90% down, alongside the rest of the market? Even if they lost faith in the project, any rational person would at least wait for Link to recover like every other project will in the next bull-run, and then they would sell once they at least broke even.

[Anonymous No.50234641]

>>50234613
>any rational person would at least wait for Link to recover like every other project will in the next bull-run
If "any other project" will recover, then why hold Chainlink?
Especially when you don't believe in Chainlink anymore?

[Anonymous No.50234790]

>>50234641
>If "any other project" will recover, then why hold Chainlink?
Because they bought Chainlink when they had faith in it, now they've lost faith but are down 90%. They will not sell at a loss and wait for it to recover. That's all.
Anyway, I still believe in Link and am accumulating. I just think your way of thinking is a bit obtuse here.

[Anonymous No.50234893]

>>50234790
Everything is down 90%, like you said yourself.
If you think "every other crypto" will recover, then why would you continue to hold Chainlink if you don't believe in it anymore?
Switch to a crypto you believe in more.

Continuing to hold makes zero sense, whichever way you try to look at it.

[Anonymous No.50234932]

>>50234222
jfc, yes, we have talked about this ad nauseam

[Anonymous No.50234982]

>>50234149
I remember a an old document from the dod that had chainlinks Oracle network diagram in it. It would've been about 2-3 years ago

[Anonymous No.50235006]

>>50231206
Just sell, retard

[Anonymous No.50235110]

>>50234982
Yes I’m sure the department of defense can’t wait to the eth/usd price feed

[Anonymous No.50235289]

>>50227785
I question the intent behind shitty copy pastas.

[Anonymous No.50237697]

>>50231187
This. I can't have been the only that sold when they had partnered with ALBT. During that time, I think. There was enough hype and I made a profit.

[Anonymous No.50237717]

>>50234982
I haven't seen this document. Where can I find it, anon

[Anonymous No.50237732]

>>50233470
kek what the fuck

[Anonymous No.50237776]

>>50235110
The dod thing was a dude who came onto /biz/ and said that he did DoD work, something to do with a "Bane hardened node" or some shit, it was way over everyone's heads, so he left.
It was literally just a private project from some random anon.
>https://github.com/WilsonBillkia/bane
Maybe this? I remember the words "bane" and "ansible" and they both turn up there.

[Anonymous No.50238983]

>>50233081
Sadly Ive already done all of this. Link was going to be the final piece allowing me to have financial independence and the ability to start a family. And what happenned instead? That lying FAGGOT sergey dumped all over us in the middle of alt season and destroyed any chance at token appreciation for the next 3-5 FUCKING years minimum.

When I have the chance to make all the money back, I cant wait to sue the fuck out of scamlink, which will hopefully be a security by then. Selling most of my stack if we ever hit 15 again so I can be back close to where I wouldve been two fucking years ago.

Also, that piece of shit Sergey touted Celsius as a partner all of last year when he knew they were suppressing token price. Never trust a fucking Russian.

[Anonymous No.50239504]

>>50238983
This is trying far too hard, and doesn't even remotely sound convincing. You need to keep it more concise, and stop rambling on so angrily. Everyone knows staking is around the corner and remember that you're supposed to, too. You have to remember that some of us are good at fudding, and we get them doubting themselves and the project, only to have their faith in it restored when you come along and start wading in with this OTT rubbish. Don;t bother fudding if you can't do a decent job of it, bud. Leave it to others. I get it, you're trying. That's good, but don't ruin the thread for the rest of us.

[Anonymous No.50239568]

>>50239504
Answer this: Niggers, Jews. Good news or bad news?

[Anonymous No.50240705]

>>50239568
bad news
250 eoy