PlanB

[Anonymous No.50214724]

The absolute cockiness

[Anonymous No.50214744]

just the other week

[Anonymous No.50214755]

>>50214744
then he started shilling referral links

>deposit!

[Anonymous No.50214780]

>>50214724
>>50214744
>>50214755
With jews, (You) lose.

[Anonymous No.50214810]

>>50214724
PlanB was correct, but he couldn't foresee a war. The war is distorting the prices just like a black hole distorts the light, but soon we will resume our glorious journey to $100,000 and the world will be flabbergasted.

[Anonymous No.50214945]

>PlanB was correct, but he couldn't foresee a war. The war is distorting the prices just like a black hole distorts the light, but soon we will resume our glorious journey to $100,000 and the world will be flabbergasted.

[Anonymous No.50215067]

>black hole

[Anonymous No.50215162]

[Anonymous No.50215240]

[Anonymous No.50215286]

>>50214724
>suck-to-blow model

[Anonymous No.50215315]

>PlanB was correct

[Anonymous No.50215393]

To believe in "black holes" you must really be schizo. It requires a schizo mind. It requires doublethink.

"Black holes" violate Einstein's Relativity theories (let's just pretend they're correct), yet in the institutionalized "settled science" dogma, they simultaneously believe in Relativity. And "black holes" (as defined by the "black hole" believers themselves) can't exist in a Big Bang Universe, yet they simultaneously believe in the Big Bang. And by the official "black hole" """science""" there can't be /multiple/ "black holes" in the same universe simultaneously, yet they believe there are. It's 100% schizo and idiotic.

Institutionalized "settled science" followers are basically religious - they ignore any science and facts which contradicts their belief system.

To everyone who wish to learn and educate themselves, here's an excellent scientific paper describing the problems and contradictions with "black holes" and Relativity: https://files.catbox.moe/b3aur6.pdf

And here are great educational videos for those who don't want to read (all the following is based on /real science/ and observations of reality, as opposed to the "settled science" dogma):

https://youtu.be/kI14fpM3ouU

https://youtu.be/Iz8RRN8rY00

https://youtu.be/yc9PB_4F-OU

https://youtu.be/J4NffTr_GMk

https://youtu.be/Dk2-lH9ewuA

https://youtu.be/ev10ywLFq6E

https://youtu.be/I8y3VrrVEpI

https://youtu.be/Dz2A4qXJQjc

https://youtu.be/-FdWTH08u30

https://youtu.be/Q185InpONK4

https://youtu.be/CHZ5O0jTH8A

https://youtu.be/nLC4MA6_Oq0

https://youtu.be/GfyNOEMjzI4

https://youtu.be/lmROfjgViLE

https://youtu.be/TiKYvUtpJXA

https://youtu.be/MvNCWMD6so4

https://youtu.be/TdYrgJrBFr0

https://youtu.be/-03lh_tHMJ0

https://youtu.be/FIgmsQOKnmk

https://youtu.be/ot-9R2GZxp8

https://youtu.be/p8lKQMEYYLw

https://youtu.be/_c9M33FLH40

https://youtu.be/SeIHTCdOGWs

https://youtu.be/4IdMz8PkGZM

https://youtu.be/kz-Bwi5xTTs

https://youtu.be/xUC_a-IMmGs

https://youtu.be/hC_KkLvG22A

[Anonymous No.50215719]

.

[Anonymous No.50215831]

It's absolutely hilarious how "Black Hole" believers call non-believers schizo when they're themselves fully schizo - since all alleged "Black Hole" models pertain to a universe that's spatially infinite, is eternal, contains only one mass, is not expanding, and is asymptotically flat or asymptotically not flat. But their "Big Bang" cosmology pertains to a universe that's spatially finite (one case) or spatially infinite (two different cases), is of finite age, contains radiation and many masses including multiple "Black Holes" (some of which are supposedly primordial), is expanding, and is not asymptotically anything.

Thus "Black Holes" and the "Big Bang" contradict one another - they're mutually exclusive. This is undeniable and clear as day. And despite claims for millions of "Black Holes" existing, none has ever been discovered.

And it's surprisingly easy to prove that neither General Relativity nor Newton's theory predict "Black Holes" to exist.

It's also not difficult to prove General Relativity violates the usual conservation of energy and momentum. There are fundamental contradictions contained in "Black Hole" theory, "Big Bang" cosmology, as well as in General Relativity. Their attempts at numerical methods to prove their theory are therefore meaningless.

Oh and for those who'd like to use the defense that in an expanding universe energy isn't conserved and thus the "energy conservation law" is false and therefore all criticism of Einstein's field equations are incorrect, friendly reminder to you that Einstein required his field equations to satisfy the usual conservation of energy and momentum.

To do so he introduced his pseudotensor which has been demonstrated to be entirely meaningless (see: https://de.catbox.moe/hvc1fy.pdf and related: https://de.catbox.moe/q7ll4z.pdf )

The "Big Bang" theory is based upon Einstein’s field equations. Since the field equations violate the usual conservation laws, the theory of a "Big Bang" is fundamentally flawed.

[Anonymous No.50215883]

>>50215831
Therefore, invoking the "Big Bang" creationism to attempt to circumvent the violation of the usual conservation laws is a circular argument and therefore completely invalid.

Furthermore, Einstein's field equations are nonlinear and so the principle of Superposition doesn't hold in General Relativity - but it does hold in Newton's theory.

Thus (see pic related) if X and Y are two different solutions to Einstein's field equations, then the linear combination of aX + bY, where a and b are scalars, isn't a solution. Physically this means that one can't simply pile up masses and radiation in any given spacetime to obtain multiple masses and radiation. Additionally, there are no solutions to Einstein's field equations for two or more masses and there is no existence theorem by which it can even be asserted that the field equations contain latent solutions for two or more masses. Thus it's not possible to insert a "Black Hole" universe into a "Big Bang" universe or into another "Black Hole" universe, or to insert a "Big Bang" universe into a "Black Hole" universe or another "Big Bang" universe. Nevertheless, Einstein's followers routinely and incorrectly claim the existence of multiple "Black Holes" from objects such as stars by means of irresistible gravitational collapse. That's truly maximum schizo.

[Anonymous No.50216174]

[Anonymous No.50216197]

[Anonymous No.50216415]

>>50214810
fuck off JlDF fag

[Anonymous No.50217740]

>>50216415
saved

[Anonymous No.50217794]

Lol it takes all of two words to set off the resident off his meds schizo.