LINKPOOL

[Anonymous No.49866847]

linkpool bros get in here, theres something i need to share

[Anonymous No.49866922]

>>49866847
as you can see, we still have 277k LPL unmigrated from the OG token. we have 98.6% staked on the linkpool app. And then we have two bancor wallets that totaling 227k LPL.

[Anonymous No.49866966]

>>49866922
im the one who was tracking the liquidity providers of LPL on a spreadsheet since the inception of the LPL token. if you recall, the majority of LPL liquidity comes from 1 person, and nearly all of it comes from 6 people

[Anonymous No.49867011]

>>49866966
If you've been following this bancor situation, you know that there is a 7 day wait period for withdrawals from bancor v3 (and you cant withdraw from v2, you have to migrate to v3 and then withdraw and wait 7 days). They recently created a new coupon token called bnLPL which makes tracking liquidity providers infinitely easier than how i was doing it before. bookmark this
>https://etherscan.io/token/0x5d74b268d60d70cb35487f8c7a2def58c13b5a36#balances

[Anonymous No.49867057]

>>49867011
And now we arrive at the reason why i have brought you all here. The largest liqudity provider of LPL has initiated his withdrawal from bancor. YOU HAVE 7 DAYS LEFT BEFORE YOU CANT BUY LPL ANYMORE

[Anonymous No.49867102]

>>49867057
181k LPL pending withdrawal. 146k LPL of that from a single person, who now has to wait 7 days before he can actually withdraw - with no impermanent loss protection.

[Anonymous No.49867130]

Bump

[Anonymous No.49867143]

>>49867057
Won't they still be the other 5 wallets to buy from?
>>49867102
Will this whale even get his full stack? What happens to the LPL he doesn't get.

And wtf is bnLPL? Linkpool is certainly not going to accept some worthless minted shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.49867171]

aye cheers fella
pool's fockin closed innit

[Anonymous No.49867173]

What's the implication for anybody wanting to sell?

[Anonymous No.49867183]

>>49867057
can he not stop the withdrawal within the 7 days?

[Anonymous No.49867193]

>>49866847
johnny rims horses

[Anonymous No.49867195]

>>49867143
If people keep buying LPL from the market, no he won't get his full stack back. There is simply not enough to go around and right now you can just buy this whales LPL on Bancor for the next 7 days and he has to watch you do it.

[Anonymous No.49867243]

>>49867130
based
>>49867143
so bancor has 227k LPL in their possession, 181k pending withdrawal, which leaves 46k LPL on bancor after this is complete. but you're right, we have no idea if they will get their full stack back, and im fairly sure this 146k LPL withdrawer will not be able to get his entire stack back. we'll have to wait and see but my point is that if you are thinking about buying Linkpool, now is the time. Now that this bancor situation has happened, and staking so near, no one will ever provide LPL liquidity to bancor again, so its basically the last LPL for sale. bnLPL, just like bnLINK or bnETH is something bancor started using quite recently, just think of it like a receipt. if you had provided liquidity you have this receipt token and then when you go to redeem it, it gets burned and you get your LPL back

[Anonymous No.49867293]

>>49867243
I've got 10k LPL I want to sell
What does this mean for me?

[Anonymous No.49867305]

1 LINK = 1 LINK

Not falling for this

[Anonymous No.49867307]

>>49867171
pools closed in 7 days
>>49867173
if you want to sell, use bancor to swap for whatever other token you want. no real implication right now. My theory is the original OG dex will be revived, as that worked really well imo for Linkpool because linkpool is a token that the majority of holders will never sell because its going to provide us the passive income and allow you to do whatever you want in your life.
>>49867183
absolutely, after 7 days he will be presented with the details on how much of the LPL he will actually get back. for example, people withdrawing their LINK from bancor right now are getting 53% of it back, with no impermanent loss protection, they are just taking a 47% haircut on their LINK stack just to get it back. Similar with ETH. And after that 7 days, he can cancel the withdrawal and leave it on bancor if desired

[Anonymous No.49867327]

>>49867243
why in the world would i want to buy LPL if the liquidity comes from 6 individuals?

[Anonymous No.49867330]

>>49867057
>implying he won't just park his liquidity on Uniswap now Bancor is imploding
yawn

[Anonymous No.49867365]

Interesting. Thanks for the research OP.

[Anonymous No.49867369]

we only have 1 successful withdrawal from bancor v3 so far. That person was made whole on their 5k LPL, so they suffered no loss. Thats all we really have to go on right now . time will tell, but i think people are going to suffer some loss, just as LINK and ETH withdrawers are suffering

[Anonymous No.49867385]

Lmao the level of cope in this thread. There was no real liquidity to begin with yet LPL didn’t moon. Not even on staking news. You know why? Because the token is literally useless, there will plenty of space to stake at all the dozens of nodes that make at least as much link as linkpool. Meanwhile the lack of liquidity means there’s absolutely no way to sell your big bags of 1.7% apy. Good luck linkpoocucks

[Anonymous No.49867397]

Nice OP. The lpl situation was what made me avoid bancor as it was clear that a massive pump of link would make their IL protection untenable - but though I was wary of it I never expected it to implode as bad as it has. Whoever this is deserves to take the loss, liquidity providers sold out the singularity

[Anonymous No.49867420]

>>49867305
Ngmi
>>49867385
>Lpl didnt moon
No one bought LPL because we thought it would "moon". That's why 99% of the circulating supply is locked in lpl staking. You just don't get it.

[Anonymous No.49867436]

>>49867327
you're right you probably shouldnt buy lpl then.
>>49867330
he was retarded enough to provide liquidity to bancor in the first place, im not going to bother speculate on what he'll do next
>>49867365
based thanks fren

[Anonymous No.49867464]

>>49867243
>if you are thinking about buying Linkpool, now is the time.
Lol. Lmao. Low liquidity tokens are *always* over-valued, never under. Unless you are buying OTC at a DEEP discount now is absolutely not the time.

[Anonymous No.49867468]

>>49867307
>for example, people withdrawing their LINK from bancor right now are getting 53% of it back, with no impermanent loss protection, they are just taking a 47% haircut on their LINK stack just to get it back.
will be interesting price wise if he goes through with this. :)

[Anonymous No.49867483]

>>49867385
kek thats a funny argument to try to continue to make. You gonna stake your link on Celcius? Bancor? maybe run your own node? where exactly will you stake?
>>49867397
based and same for me, LPL helped me realize the ponzi that bancor is/was
>>49867420
based

[Anonymous No.49867507]

>>49867464
right now LPL is at its highest liquidity point in the history of the LPL token. im saying that it will be at the lowest point in 7 days, once the guy withdraws. if you dont already own some linkpool this thread isnt for you.
>>49867468
sure will be fren

[Anonymous No.49867575]

>>49867420
What I get is you sunk your money in a token you can’t sell due to lack of liquidity and that will need to earn you yield for 40 years before you get your initial back out, ignoring inflation

>>49867483
On any of of the dozen nodes that have the same daily rewards according to market dot link

[Anonymous No.49867607]

>>49867507
>right now LPL is at its highest liquidity point in the history of the LPL token.
Yes, which liquidity is still absolutely pathetic. Liquidity going to zero is not bullish lmao. It has the market profile of a literal scam coin.

[Anonymous No.49867629]

Just bought a little with what liquidity I have easily available. Not much, but whoever provided it isn't getting it back

[Anonymous No.49867942]

>>49867057
Pool will be closed forever.
We made it Linkpool bros

[Anonymous No.49867959]

>>49867629
Haha me too, maybe this will be a fun time killer while we wait for our dteaks

[Anonymous No.49868398]

>>49867293
Cope, you're never getting your pooled LPL back, son.

[Anonymous No.49868426]

>>49867330
What liquidity? He doesn't have it anymore, it's being fire saled in front of his eyes and he can't do shit.

[Anonymous No.49868428]

>>49868398
What are you talking about, they're sitting in my wallet, faggot

[Anonymous No.49868437]

LINKPOOL UNOFFICIAL ARE A BUNCH OF FAGGOTS AAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.49868726]

>>49867575
It's amazing how you know nothing about link and linkpool yet you still spew that nonsense from your mouth.

[Anonymous No.49868821]

>>49867057
Another way of saying you'll have no one to sell to even if the token moons

[Anonymous No.49868839]

>>49868821
>Selling lpl
Anon that's not how it goes. Seems you lot are seething you misses out.

[Anonymous No.49868908]

>>49867057
Brainlet here. Is Bancor the only place to buy LPL right now?

[Anonymous No.49869006]

>>49866847
test

[Anonymous No.49869038]

>>49868839
>1.7% yearly return's

[Anonymous No.49869047]

>>49868908
There is
>Around 1300 LPL in uniswap V2
>700 LPL in uni v3
>225k in bancor which may drop by 180k if this whale withdraws in 7 days

[Anonymous No.49869072]

>>49869038
Yeah you're seething alright.
>Instead of having 100 candies later ill instead have 1 candy now

[Anonymous No.49869157]

>>49867607
>Yes, which liquidity is still absolutely pathetic. Liquidity going to zero is not bullish lmao. It has the market profile of a literal scam coin.
Do you realize that the wet dream of this board is to see LINK mooning due to its supply shock caused by massive staking profitability right? Only Bancor cucks use low liquidity coins as something bad

[Anonymous No.49869226]

>>49869047
linkpoolyachtparty.eth has been dumping 16k LPL in the last week in Bancor, are those 16k getting added to Bancor liquidity pools?

[Anonymous No.49869288]

>>49869226
They have been already, this address was only selling LPL to shore up his liq price on Aave as he has 50k link on there. Sad times for this dude.

[Anonymous No.49870405]

>>49869288
>>49869226
His hand was so strong. Until Mark got him.

[Anonymous No.49870483]

>>49867057
Ah geez too bad my mom left for a trip recently, I’d tell her to buy a bag of 1,200 to go with her 550 link.

[Anonymous No.49871244]

>>49867385
Bruh
LPL had a $.02 ICO and is at $2.73 USD (136x)
LINK had a $.11 ICO and is at $7.39 USD (67x)
If you've strictly held onto tokens and not been a swingie, you'd literally be better off as a pooler right now. Where we are now, LPL has mooned more than LINK.
LINK is still the purer asset but you're retarded.

[Anonymous No.49871249]

>>49870483
I bought my old man 10k LPL to stake his link. He sold off all his link and only holds his LPL becuase he doesn't understand how to unstake. He'll probably make it as he'll look in 5 years and LPL will be $100+

[Anonymous No.49871403]

>>49870483
>>49871249
Based anons, you’ll make it

[Anonymous No.49871417]

>>49871244
And if you staked those same x136'd ICO LPL tokens you would be getting x14 your initial investment on a yearly basis. There is no point in selling LPL unless you need urgent liquidity

>>49870405
F for him

[Anonymous No.49871671]

>>49868726
This whole thread feels like a bunch of poolers who lost their ass chasing yield trying to trick the gullible to provide exit liquidity.

[Anonymous No.49871719]

>buy linkpool instead of PMs
>walk into grocery store and shop for an organic beef as poorfags outside protest
>approach checkout
>emaciated woman rings up my item and gives me my total
>"that will be $289,638 and 71 cents s-sir"
>never takes her eyes off my 6oz organic beef burger patty I plan to grill later
>seems like she might have been pretty before the collapse
>"sure thing babe"
>pull out my chainlink wallet
>"heres 1/100th link, keep the change sweet tits. Just need the stores address"
>she looks confused
>says they dont take whatever that is, they only accept Fed Coin, USD since there is still a few months left to turn them in for Fed Coin, or Gold and Silver
>try to argue with her
>security comes and takes my beef away and kicks me out of the store
>walk back in and demand to see the manager
>start yelling at the woman and the manager who calls security again
>"Excuse me, what is going on here?"
>everyone stops, I turn to see what silenced them
>see a 6'2" gentlemen in a suit with a cart full of whiskey and steak packages driven by multiple young virgin women
>"y-your eminence! this man here tried to buy his burger patty with something called..link I think? he is causing a scene..im so sorry"
>the man in the suit chuckles as he looks at me
>"Here you go fren"
>tosses me a small weird looking dime, seems old
>everyone in the rooms is wide eyed, manager looks at me
>"shall I ring up your 6 oz burger patty, our dear customer" he bows his head as the woman goes to the register
>"Not so fast" speaks the well dressed man in the suit
>I turn to him confused
>"He needs to earn that Mercury Dime" he says with a twisted grin
>the girls to his side giggle to each other

[Anonymous No.49871735]

>>49868908
Just quick googled it
You can literally buy it with a coinbase wallet its not muh sekrit clubhouse. Buy eth then choose swap for erc 20 tokwn and choose linkpool. But thats a quick google DYOR. I dont know this shit sounds shady af frfr no cap on god kinfoke. real talk.

[Anonymous No.49871845]

>>49871735
Hahaha retard. Where do you think the linkpool comes from, thin air? No, it comes from Bancor . You can but it on pancakeswap, waffleswap, whatever fucking swap site you want but it’s coming from bancor if you are buying lpl
>he googled it
Top fucking kek, take a lap son

[Anonymous No.49871914]

>>49871417
I'm fully staked, as one should be.
>>49871735
Coinbase wallet just defaults to using Bancor for LPL, so it will have a quarter the available supply next week too.

[Anonymous No.49872307]

>>49871719

[Anonymous No.49872312]

>>49871735
This can't be real

[Anonymous No.49872411]

>>49867195
So we need to buy LPL to prop it, and this guy will get to choose whether to complete the sale or not.
>Thanks OP for telling us about your withdrawal

[Anonymous No.49872564]

>>49867385
>just give it to Fiews bro, I’m sure it’ll be fine with a hard cap limit of 10 link per neet that stakes there

[Anonymous No.49872662]

>>49867397
>>49867436
>deserves it
>retarded
it's a team wallet you retards

[Anonymous No.49872728]

>>49869157
LINK toucan needed, lpl no sneezed. That's the difference. Yours is a false comparison

[Anonymous No.49872793]

>>49872728
You will pay a fee to LPL stakers if you want to stake your LINK, whether you like it or not :*

[Anonymous No.49872864]

>>49872793
>link pool will be the only pool
>trusting your stinkies to a nascent tech like lpl or bancor
You'll never get my stinkies you stupid kike

[OLD FAG HERE. BIG BAG AND ALL. LINK/LPL No.49872911]

>>49872793
the 99% will all soon learn fren.

[Anonymous No.49872976]

>>49872864
>comparing Linkpool, the top performing node of the last three years with bancor, a ponzi scheme
>>49872411
The more lpl people buy, while the still can, the less that person who withdrew will get. You think I provide liquidity to bancor? LOL newfaggot gtfo

[Anonymous No.49873208]

Giga brainlet here. So do I buy LPL or not?

[Anonymous No.49873368]

>>49867143
bnLPL is akin to something like aLINK- a token made to represent what holdings you have in the protocol
>put TOKEN in, get bnTOKEN in return
>take token out, your bnTOKEN is burned and TOKEN returned
but, seems, only half returned now, due to the bankrun

[Anonymous No.49873547]

>>49872662
No way is it a team wallet, its either MB or some twitter clown. And if I say they fucking deserve it they deserve it and fuck you too not your protocol not your crypto

[Anonymous No.49873625]

>>49867629
>>49867959
based
>>49873547
probably just a clown. not MB though. people are learning quite the expensive lesson, but thats how you know its a good lesson. kek just checked the guy withdrawing 140k lpl also has 130k link on bancor... or had i should say

[Anonymous No.49873659]

>>49873625
>had 130k link on bancor
>will lose 1/2 of that
jesus, what a slaughter

[Anonymous No.49873740]

Let's all buy it while he's waiting for 7 days. Deplete his 140k LPL.

[Anonymous No.49874131]

>>49866966
uh oh, 45 mins ago another liquidity provider from this list initiated their withdrawal of 14k LPL. this is going to be glorious lpl bros.
>>49873740
based, very based.

[Anonymous No.49874158]

>>49873659
and he isnt even trying to withdraw his LINK, so he will either lose all of it or none of it. quite a gamble

[Anonymous No.49874212]

>>49873740
we're reaching levels of based that shouldn't even be theoretically possible

[Anonymous No.49874305]

This is pussy juice, this will also be another irritating pussy juice. I'm big on NFT based projects now.

Every problem that we have in society has a suite of relative solutions that are also business opportunities.

Depression is a problem. But solving that problem is a business opportunity for perfect misfit and an opportunity to reach out to the community. Perfect misfit is a decent NFT platform, here to redefine the sphere

[Anonymous No.49874439]

>>49866847
i own 2k unswapped lpl tokens waiting for link to moon to touch that wallet

[Anonymous No.49874527]

Why the hell would anyone buy this blatant scam not even affiliated with Chainlink Labs when they can just buy the OG token (ticker: LINK)? Srs question.

[Anonymous No.49874572]

>>49874527
You can buy both or neither at all, and it's up to you who you trust, but lpl is explicitly designed to extract value from the link network and give it to you with minimal effort. Link itself has never had that explicit purpose.

[Anonymous No.49874575]

How many LPL do I need to make it?

[Anonymous No.49874604]

>>49874572
>Link itself has never had that explicit purpose.
Anon, I... Good luck with your third party tokens. You'll need it.

[Anonymous No.49874644]

>>49869006
Failes

[Anonymous No.49874934]

>>49874604
The link project's purpose is to create their network, if its profitable then fair enough, but it has never at any point had the stated aim of being a profit machine. That's a secondary purpose at best. Lpl has only ever been a profit driven project.

[Anonymous No.49874947]

>>49874575
1000k LPL suicide stack
25k LPL Make it stack
100k LPL god stack

[Anonymous No.49875051]

>>49870405
>>49869288
What happened to him?

[Anonymous No.49875137]

>>49874947
>1000k
Post hands

[Anonymous No.49875155]

i have several hundred thousand, what does that make me

[Anonymous No.49875260]

>>49874604
Good luck setting up your node and not getting a power failure causing your stake to get slashed. Half of LINKies will be too lazy to even set up an uninterruptible power supply, Linkpool's NaaS will get them in with a nominal fee for LPL stakers.

[Anonymous No.49875733]

Linkpool isn't a scam, but the desperation for lpl holders to cash in on the ridiculous prices right now is apparent. For it to be worth buying LPL over pure link right now, you'd have to get insane APY for probably years just to break even. Even if you hold a large amount of link you'll still almost guaranteed outperform any LPL purchase by just buying link and taking profits on whatever you bought today in 2-3 years from now.

Note I'm not saying LPL is a scam, its just wildly overvalued and the reason there is shill threads posted here almost daily is likely because LPL holders are attempting to find buyers to squeak some out. Notice the curry style messaging (stay poor), nobody says shit like that about link, in fact the opposite, they just fud you and tell you not to buy it.

[Anonymous No.49875925]

>>49875733
It's the opposite.
Fuders want to buy more LPL but the holders are not selling them anything.
The reason 98% of LPL is staked is because the LPL holders understand the real value of Linkpool and that what we have now is nothing compared to their future.

[Anonymous No.49875942]

>>49874527
>not even affiliated with Chainlink Labs
>Chainlink Labs
the founder of linkpool has worked for chainlink for years, and they received money from chainlink for development. but you know this
>>49874947
based, feels good with god-tier stack
>>49875155
checked and makes you better than me. very nice fren

[Anonymous No.49876055]

>>49875925
Nobody cares about linkpool, if there was a market for it people would be trading it, there's no liquidity at all. Its a safe way to guaranteed stake your link, but if you think its going to be the only mechanism you got fed a line, and its currently massively overvalued compared to the simple play of purchasing link tokens. Shilling lpl over link right now is actually nuclear weapons grade link fud, because if lpl is actually a better purchase than link, it means link is going to remain worthless for years and lpl is going to give out 80% staking rewards or something.

[Anonymous No.49876090]

>>49875733
>under .4 LINK/LPL = underpriced
>over .4 LINK/LPL = overpriced
Literally that easy we're moving to a post dollar future start thinking in terms of post dollar ratios

[Anonymous No.49876110]

>>49876055
>nobody cares about linkpool
>posting in a linkpool thread
you should value yourself more highly anon, you arent a nobody are you?

[Anonymous No.49876171]

>shilling your own LPL bags

[Anonymous No.49876192]

>>49876055
a 25k stack of LPL will get ~8k LINK if LPL gets 10% of the jobs and in turn 10% of the 350,000,000 staking incentive LINK to divide out to holders.
How do you beat inflation? Suckle from the teat of inflation.

[Anonymous No.49876227]

API3 makes this shit obsolete

[Anonymous No.49876232]

>>49876171
Actually we're shilling someone else's bags itt; read the thread. Bags they were dumb enough to donate to bancor for us to buy

[Anonymous No.49876260]

>>49876110
I'm posting in the thread because I own chainlink, the token that linkpool claims will have an early monopoly on staking (which was already debunked by sergey with the staking news 2 weeks ago). And also because the board is mostly dead, its this or one of the bancor/celsius threads, or one of the random offtopic shitpost threads. I have nothing against LPL either, this anon at least gives a fair assessment
>>49871244
>>49876090
of course he also sort of btfo's himself by admitting holding lpl from initial release makes it a better asset...which also more or less proves that its overvalued relative to link right now.

[Anonymous No.49876284]

>>49876192
yes if lpl has a monopoly on staking for the first 10 years or so
>inb4hedoesn'tknow
sergey already btfo you with the staking announcement, lpl shills were nowhere to be found funny enough that week.

[Anonymous No.49876342]

>>49876260
It's been bouncing around over and under the .4 LINK ratio all week. But it hasn't been a bad hold, and that's not saying LINK is a bad hold either you proselytized retard.

[Anonymous No.49876462]

>>49876192

> 10% of the jobs

Not even a top 5 node operator

[Anonymous No.49876516]

>>49876284
Will a company hire a back-end to make a node, use a more likely less reputable staking pool and still pay a fee, or use the most trusted blue chip pool's NaaS service? Idk maybe usage and reward is actually higher than just 8k LINK in the 10 year period given that possibility.

[Anonymous No.49876626]

>>49876462
kek, lplcels on life support

[Anonymous No.49876695]

>>49876462
I'll get my fingers in the pie of Inotel, DexTrac, Fiews, LinkForest, and Chainlayer if I can, but I don't need to sweat about it because it's not like anyone else can get shares in them.

[Anonymous No.49876736]

how much LPL to stake 10k link again?

[Anonymous No.49876748]

>>49876695

There was literally a Fiews staking post a couple of days ago. They're ready. LPL's value proposition isn't as big as everyone is making it out to be.

[Anonymous No.49876828]

>>49876748
Literally nobody has a value proposition on people using Fiews other than the Fiews team.
Seems like the pool wars are here, it'll be fun.

[Anonymous No.49876890]

>>49876828
Correct. Fiews' value proposition isn't relevant to users because it isn't going to make a token. It doesn't need to :)

[Anonymous No.49877022]

>>49876890
Oh no, a company in the blockchain space using the blockchain to handle ownership, call fucking Satoshi we've gone too far
Fiews will do it someday retard

[Anonymous No.49877083]

If you think, that LPL is only for staking allowance. You are a brainlet and you deserve to stay poor.

Linkpool will be one of main player in the staking game. Backed by the marines. You are entitled to Linkpool profit.

Ethereum staking will be available soon. If data is the new oil, and Link will be bigger than BTC. Linkpool is the oil well.

[Anonymous No.49877115]

>>49877022
Imagine not having any other logical argument and resorting to the brainlet reply of "it will happen someday retard". Omegalul and omegacope

[Anonymous No.49877132]

>>49876260
>I'm posting in this thread because I shit on the streets of Calcutta.
No one finds that surprising at all.

[Anonymous No.49877169]

>>49876736
25k
It's a 0.4 ratio

[Anonymous No.49877231]

Imagine that out of all nodes. Only Linkpool will be open for the public.

You will stake with LPL. If you don't like it, stake with calcutta stake and lose your LINK.

[Anonymous No.49877242]

>>49877115
Who the fuck invests in blockchain and doesn't think the efficiency gains justify tokenizing real assets like ownership once the space gets more organized. Fiews will do something in that vein someday.
LPL is just already there.

[Anonymous No.49877268]

>>49877132
Yes only lpl shills allowed in lpl threads, funny enough I probably have more link than anyone you'd be shilling lpl to anyways. I already said lpl's not a scam, but the shilling is fucking tiresome and you can't have a legitimate discussion about lpl because anons who don't want to admit its overvalued reee for dozens of posts if you suggest otherwise.

[Anonymous No.49877289]

>>49867575
Yeah, and those nodes on market.link will use LPL staking infustructure instead of launching their own token, you stupid stupidy dumb dumb idiot nigger

[Anonymous No.49877295]

>>49877231
>stay poor stay poor!
>no anon you are the indian!

[Anonymous No.49877317]

>>49876055
>there's no liquidity at all.
Yeah because people arent selling

[Anonymous No.49877339]

>>49877242
Do you even know how smart contracts work? You don't need a token representing ownership to tokenize "stake". Spouting off brainlet advice without doing any research that a token is needed is literally room temperature IQ. You can do trustless staking in a smart contract without tokens.

[Anonymous No.49877341]

>>49877317
or buying
which is why there is a thread advertising for anons to buy the ones withdrawing from bancor

[Anonymous No.49877376]

>>49874131
Holy fucking shit

[Anonymous No.49877393]

>>49877339
But the company is going to have the backend, that place that runs the computers with the necessary infrastructure and the developers maintaining things? That will just exist on paper books forever right?
Also Fiews isn't free they say they are "affordable". Linkpool says it's affordable for NaaS too.

[Anonymous No.49877430]

>low supply
>high demand
>staking announced

Simple economic, anon.

[Anonymous No.49877445]

>>49876090
More like
>under 2.5 LINK/LPL = underpriced
>over 2.5 LINK/LPL = still underpriced

[Anonymous No.49877480]

>>49877393
I don't even know what you're talking about at this point. You don't understand the chainlink network, how trustless smart contracts work, or that you don't need to tokenize every single piece of infrastructure to operate in a trust minimized manner. Stay poor retard

[Anonymous No.49877491]

>>49877231
based
>>49877289
incredibly accurate and based as well
>>49877376
we are going to cross 200k LPL pending withdrawal very shortly. this is like the end of summer and the local pool is having the end of season pool party. after that, pools closed

[Anonymous No.49877514]

>>49877480
Fiews is offering NaaS, where you stake tokens and they handle the backend shit so you don't need a server rack on your house. That isn't free retard.

[Anonymous No.49877533]

>>49876890
hei jonas

[Anonymous No.49877549]

>>49877491
Going to be exciting

[Anonymous No.49877580]

>>49877514
Yeah neither is NAAS retard. And Fiews beat LinkPool to NAAS at $10/month. Cope harder

[Anonymous No.49877625]

>>49877580
I'll stick as much as $10 a month let's me in there, you hit every pir you can, but yeah it's not going to be my breadwinner and I hope it won't be yours.

[Anonymous No.49877775]

I have one simple question: should I go all in on this?

[Anonymous No.49877805]

>>49866922
Wait, am I supposed to stack my LPL? It has been sitting in my wallet since the day I bought.
Hiw do I even go about stacking?

[Anonymous No.49878119]

>>49877805
Retard go to the official STAKING site

[Anonymous No.49878213]

>>49875733
>>49876055
>>49876171
>>49876227
>>49876260
>>49876284
>>49876626
>>49876695
>>49876748
>>49877268
>>49877295
I guarantee some of these people have been monitoring the threads as they have LPL locked up. They are shitting themselves that they are going to be left with 70%+ illiquid loss very soon

[Anonymous No.49878305]

>>49878213
so dont buy LPL right now?

[Anonymous No.49878661]

>>49876748
source? not seeing anything on their Twitter or Medium about this

[Anonymous No.49878686]

>>49878661
bump
can anyone give me qrd on other staking pools or where i might be able to learn more about them?

[Anonymous No.49878870]

>>49878686
sure try bancor or celcius. theres no other link node operator with a staking pool right now. period. when people say 'there will be other options im just going to stack link you retards' they are just fudding you out from buying linkpool
>>49877549
the things we are watching happen in real time, i mean there will be stories and movies about this shit. its nuts
>>49877805
https://app.linkpool.io/pools
ive earned around 250 LINK since jan 1st, dont miss out on your cut of LINK anon. when you dont stake it on the linkpool site, your LINK just gets split between everyone else, and we all get more because you didnt stake. dont give me free link fren

[Anonymous No.49878926]

>>49878870
I think it's naive to assume linkpool will be the only place to stake.

[Anonymous No.49878932]

>>49877805
Proxy IP test

[Anonymous No.49878997]

>>49878926
You will be staking on other nodes, yes. But you will be using LinkPool's staking infrastructure if you want to do so trustlessly. I have no doubt that retards will use centralized staking platforms and we'll see some Celsius-type situations all over again.

[Anonymous No.49879025]

>>49877805

>>49878870
This anon gave you link to the staking app.

Annoyingly it's kind of retardedly hidden on their site. Just go to pools, connect wallet and stake your LPL. The rewards are paltry at the moment but that's all about to change.

Also bookmark the site and be extra cautious with what you do and who knows you have it

[Anonymous No.49879177]

Also high IQ anons help me out please

If I have far more LPL than LINK for the required staking ratio and I have about 5k left to spare for this market

Do I: buy more LINK or LPL?

Link will still be available but LPL surely going to dry up. But I have more than enough LPL for my LINK stack.

Also considering you can probably rent your LPL out in the future to a more public nigger pool.

[Anonymous No.49879205]

>>49879025
agreed, bookmark that shit
>>49878926
okay, thats fine. i own linkpool, im staking there i quite literally have no concern if/when other options eventually come about. you really want to be waiting on the sidelines when staking is live for other options to show up? imagine the fomo. also >>49878997

[Anonymous No.49879222]

>>49878997
I won't worry about it too much then. Wish I had got my LPL when I had more LINK. I could probably get 25k LPL but it would leave me with barely any money to live I'd have to get a job.

[Anonymous No.49879275]

>>49879205
Yeah what others have said about needing an insane apy to justify the price makes sense. Link holders and people staking will both win, I'm more excited about the link supply drying up and a mega pump that is to follow. Going to pay my parents house off and figure out my life I don't care if I make 1 million or 100 million. More to life than money fren.

[Anonymous No.49879292]

>>49879177
Since you have a fat lpl stack I would just add to your link
T. Holder of more lpl than link

[Anonymous No.49879312]

>>49878870
How often do you have to redeem them? Can you just stake and leave it alone for a year or two?

[Anonymous No.49879319]

>>49879177
checked. you'll 100% be able to lease out any unused staking allowance and earn dank APY on it. Thats what the 3rd party owners pool is in pic related. Im in a similar boat and i want income vs. just buying LINK. Remember, when ETH staking is live, you'll get airdropped ethLPLA and be able to stake eth with linkpool, or lend it out just as described above. The good thing is : you are in a win win situation. its good to have money on the sidelines for times like these

[Anonymous No.49879350]

>>49879275
There’s no point in dreaming other than to help you not panic sell or do stupid things on leverage. Just ignore it and live your life for the time being. Look at GME generally and sub for people wasting their energy on “what may come about”, and just further depressing themselves more.

[Anonymous No.49879396]

>>49879275
very based, you're a good man. link holders will absolutely inherit the earth
>>49879312
you dont have to redeem them at all, i just did it at the start of the year to see how many i earn per year, and its only a small transaction fee to claim. you can leave it alone for decades if you want

[Anonymous No.49879831]

>>49879292
>>49879319
Thanks anons, though if I just fucking stable coined months ago I'd have over 200k for this situation. Fuck!

Since LPL gonna dry up and become rare. Think I'll get the last I can of it. Will always be able to DCA more link

[Anonymous No.49880959]

>>49879831
This little lady thinks she's got it all figured out.

[Anonymous No.49881241]

>>49879831
based
>>49880959
thats really cute bro

[Anonymous No.49881286]

>>49867057
About time
I've never wanted it in the first place
Why would people care about a couple of jonny's insecure terraform templates?

[Anonymous No.49881418]

>>49881286
no one has any idea what you just typed. congrats, seriously.
>I've never wanted it in the first place
wow insightful, let me count how many times ive gone into a thread about an asset i have 'never wanted'. ya, its nearly zero. welcome to the thread nigger

[Anonymous No.49881485]

>>49881241
Thanks anon

Not to mention holding LPL will get you more link but holding Link won't get you more LPL

>>49880959
1 post by this tranny ID

[Anonymous No.49881539]

>>49871249
Nice, I might just buy some lpl for my mom now and she can get me chicken tenders in return a few times when I feel hungry.

[Anonymous No.49882112]

>have a grand to put into crypto
>already have 15k Link and 3k LPL
Which would you chose?

[Anonymous No.49882369]

>>49876192
how much allowance will linkpool get with this first SLA? 75,000,000 link staked for ETH/USD price feed, at 10% that's 7.5 million or 0.075 link per linkpool, at 5% APY that's 0.00375 link annual per link staked. not bad for one SLA

[Anonymous No.49882800]

>>49882112
LPL

[Anonymous No.49882972]

>>49882369
Have you ever thought about how well you'd do trading companies that actually produce value, instead of falling this deep into scam after scam?

[Anonymous No.49883044]

>>49876462

ChainlinkP and the P stands for Pussy

Nice cherry pick. Enjoy waiting until 2023 to stake while we absorb the first 75M

[Anonymous No.49883136]

>>49882972
sometimes yeah

[Anonymous No.49883661]

>>49882112
You need 33k lpl to fully stake you link on link pool

[Anonymous No.49884768]

Pool's closing. I wonder what bancor will do with the lpl they steal.

[Anonymous No.49884800]

>>49882112
link fo sho

[Anonymous No.49884892]

>>49884768
Sacrifice it to Baphomet.

[Anonymous No.49885296]

>>49867102
I bought 1500 LPL from this fag today. Any one else buying it up just to punish liquidity fags? I have a couple thousand link I could trade for LPL. should we bring him pain?

[Anonymous No.49886214]

>>49882972
Lol
Peekaboo
Lmao

[Anonymous No.49886219]

>>49885296
Depends on who you want to punish. If the whales withdraw the 200k that's pending then there's only 55k lpl left to buy. If that gets slurped up then the pool is officially closed. Otherwise right now it's 255k lpl to buy. Either way i suspect the whale will lose a lot of his lpl due to bancor being greedy jews.

[Anonymous No.49886289]

>have 10k link worth 70k
>in order to stake this you need to buy 60k worth of a completely third party token, this is just laughable

Sorry you guys are totally delusional if you think that this is how its going to go, the fact that link is the main commodity and Lpl needs link not the other day around, I cant imagine any scenerio where you shouldn't just buy more link.
There is no way sergey is gonna allow a random third party to completely middle man and gatekeep staking.

The entire premise is that the nodes will need more link in order to secure better paying jobs, that means all the nodes will be competing with eachother to incentive link holders to stake their link in their nodes..

Link is the scarce commodity here, the job of Lpl can be replaced by any node provider, nodes are not even hard to run.

Guy guys are really bragging about there not being any Lpl for sale? Sounds like youre coping because youre in a rugpull situation, since none of you can even sell and cash out because there is no demand for your shitcoin, it typically has something like $50k daily volume, thats worse then a low tier jeet rug.
Volume comes directly from demand..
Link has a billion in daily volume, because it has demand.

[Anonymous No.49886422]

>>49886289
How much lpl are you about to lose to bancor?

[Anonymous No.49886535]

>>49867243
I had 500 LPL on bancor and couldn’t get my full stack back. Got about 350, had to sell BNT and buy the rest. No fucking way he gets everything back, not even close.

[Anonymous No.49886564]

>>49886535
>Sold bnt
They won't even get bnt because the jews turned it off.

[Anonymous No.49886588]

With the pools closing in a week, how will matt beale feed his family?
How will he pay his taxes?
What if the majority lp that's about to take a 50% haircut is none other than Matt beale. Won't someone please think of matt beale.

[Anonymous No.49886608]

>>49886422
0 I never used bancor, or hold Lpl.
Debunk my post

Why would someone pay money just to stake, when the nodes get paid proportional to how much link they have, meaning its in everyone's best interest to get as much people to pool their link together as possible, to get the highest paying jobs.

Show me ONE coin, where in order to stake, you first have to purchase a third party shitcoin which has no official relation to the coin youre trying to stake.

[Anonymous No.49886635]

>>49886608
>Debunk my post
The entire thread debunks your post. Maybe you should read it instead of lying on the internet.

[Anonymous No.49886847]

>>49886608
it might be an idea to read through this:
https://talk.linkpool.io/t/linkpool-faq-feedback-welcome/130
the main thing about buying lpl is having a cut of all of their revenue (their node, naas, managed nodes, market)
having prioritized staking access to their node is really just a bonus

[Anonymous No.49886908]

>>49886289
You don't understand LPL any more than you understand a toilet.

[Anonymous No.49887067]

>>49886608
to help a low iqer here's a good bit from the faq that it's important to understand with link staking:
>Will there be a maximum amount of stakeable LINK within the LinkPool ecosystem?
>In the Chainlink context, “staking” is the ability to collateralize job requests as a Chainlink node operator in order to be eligible for jobs that require it. That means that there will be a very specific demand for LINK collateral, and once the demand is met, the rewards won’t increase despite increasing the LINK collateral of a certain node. This applies to any Chainlink node operator. That is the main reason that inspired us to create the LinkPool Allowance token, in order to provide the ability to any potential LINK staker to secure their ability to stake LINK in the LinkPool node and those nodes participating in their trustless staking microcosmos.

[Anonymous No.49887153]

750 link here. Was gonna buy another 100 link this week, i used to think id never get to 1000 but now I just might. Should a linklet like me even consider buying lpl instead?

[Anonymous No.49887164]

>>49887153
Link is oil. Lpl is a well to draw oil.

[Anonymous No.49887548]

>>49866847
Today OP was NOT a faggot
Well done anon

[Anonymous No.49887601]

>>49886588
They were warned multiple times. They could have staked on the actual protocol and been comfy all this time.

[Anonymous No.49887672]

>>49887548
yeah pretty based

[Anonymous No.49887799]

>>49867143
DO NOT REDEEM

[Anonymous No.49887858]

SERS PLS DO NOT DO THE REDEEM TRUST BANCOR TRUST CELSIUS LEAVE YOUR TOKENS WITH THEM

[Anonymous No.49887933]

>>49887858
Ranjesh Smith? Please do the needful.

[Anonymous No.49888521]

>horsepool will be the only place to stake
>uhhh ok there's other nodes too but they won't be for retail
>uuuhhh ok there will be other retail nodes but they'll use lp infra because... BECAUSE THEY JUST HAVE TO OK!!
>POOLS CLOSED STAY POOR IM NOT SEETHING YOU ARE
what will the next cope be?

[Anonymous No.49888592]

thank you OP for the findings

[Anonymous No.49888881]

>>49888521
The fact that all of you cunts will be using node services that take fees out of your pockets anyway which makes you less economically threatening to us.

[Anonymous No.49888905]

>>49871671
thats because it is

[Anonymous No.49889646]

>>49888881
This. Linkpool is more than just early link staking. Pool's closed.

[Anonymous No.49889692]

>>49889646
It's a blockchain company with true ownership shares, one of many to come in many other service fields which may well be using Linkpool's services.
Exciting times honestly.
Captcha DKNWA

[Anonymous No.49889745]

Those that are likely to make millions during the AltSeason2022 begin their planning now. I'm hunting more WAVES, ETH, and, most importantly, Syscon ATM. This provide BTC merge mining and security, as well as an ETH bridge with extremely low costs.

[Anonymous No.49889772]

>>49885296
He's gonna lose half to Bancor anyway. Might as well twist the knife.

Slurped 2.5k LPL, all I had left in me. Even traded some link just after it fucking crashes fuck me

[Anonymous No.49889874]

>give your valuable tokens and keys to a third party in exchange for their promisory token
What happened to not your keys not your coins? When staking rolls out you can just loan out your linkies via smart contract to some node operator for a defined return. This is a million times safer than getting some third party token on which the issuer gives you a promise of some % of his profits while you give him the golden egg that is LINK token.
It's like linkpool "investors" miss the whole point of smart contracts. Truth, not trust.
Absolute brainlets, the lot of you.

[Anonymous No.49889882]

>>49872911
Checked

[Anonymous No.49889923]

>>49878213
I bought some to add to my own stack.
But more seriously we need a platform to buy and sell LPL.

The original system allowed buy and sell order for LP against ETH.
Could we at least get something with a basic buy/sell functionality?

[Anonymous No.49889964]

>>49876260
You’re an idiot. My link stack sits there. My LPL prints Link. Which ones overvalued again?

[Anonymous No.49890344]

>>49886289
>>49886608
love how in every lpl thread there's retards like this that fundamentally do not understand what lpl even does and still tout their absolute mouth breathing smoothbrain opinions like they're facts

[Anonymous No.49890371]

>>49889874
Ngmi. You contradict yourself because you dont know what you're talking about.

[Anonymous No.49890801]

>>49887164
Might even go deeper than that, LINK is a well to draw oil, LPL is the land oil barons have to rent in order to draw their oil.

[Anonymous No.49890833]

>>49889874
Good luck anon, genuinely. You remind me of me in 2017. If I were you i'd do some more research, I had time to work it out, you don't have that luxury. Pools' closing early this summer.

[Anonymous No.49891166]

>>49866847
I don't know what linkpool is but im 100% sure it's a scam. I can tell just by the logo alone. i'm also high iq

[Anonymous No.49891637]

>>49890344
Checked and mouthbreathing pilled.

[Anonymous No.49892885]

>>49891637
Oh look who is posting, it's flannel-the-cuck

[Anonymous No.49892987]

>>49881418
I used to bombard linkpool threads warning people about what the project was, I literally worked with jonny for years and I know the attitude he has to operational security when it comes to provisioning infra (terraform templates)
You're right, it's a bad habit I need to kick, I no longer give a shit about any money any anons lose
Good luck, it will blow up in your face

[Anonymous No.49893040]

>>49892987
kek nice larp faggot

[Anonymous No.49893069]

>>49889874
i lost IQ reading this post
how can people be this retarded? you realize linkpool isnt a centralized exchange right anon? you realize you need your own wallet to use it right anon? oh wait, of course you dont realize, you are literally braindead

[Anonymous No.49893231]

>>49886608
You can stake in LinkPool without LPL. Your fee will be just a bit higher

[Anonymous No.49893260]

>>49892987
Hi, Mat. Nice of you trying to fud.

[Anonymous No.49893406]

>>49893260
How many link have you got left my little stacklet? 500? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.49893706]

>>49887548
>>49887672
>>49888592
thanks frens

[Anonymous No.49894805]

>>49893069
Ok let me, rephrase this for you so you understand it, boy. You exchanged LINK token (the oil of 4th IR) for LPL tokens (???). Chainlink oracle nodes get paid in which token? Let that sink in a little.

[Anonymous No.49895962]

>>49879319
Moderately intelligent anon, shill me more about this airdropped ETH that we'll be getting

[Anonymous No.49896239]

>>49894805
smoothest of the smoothbrains allow me to put this as simply as possible so that it may hopefully absorb into one of your two brain folds...

LPL is fractional toptier node ownership.
You will get a % of all fees/Linkpool rev streams proportionate to your LPL stack which is paid to you in LINK.

I probably lost you at proportionate.

[Anonymous No.49897395]

>>49889874
Yeah those other staking pool schmoes are totally just gonna let you keep your tokens in your wallet and give you node collateral in good faith right

[Anonymous No.49897523]

And oh shit we've overpriced LPL against LINK again, don't buy LPL
Captcha TXNNN

[Anonymous No.49897681]

>>49893260
And oh fuck if that 180k is Mat, getting him to take more than a 50% haircut on his LPL severance because he wanted to try to market make a project that offed him, that would be a treat

[Anonymous No.49898005]

>>49896239
All I'm seeing is a trust based promise in a world of upcoming truth based systems. You finna get scammed boy.
>>49897395
>this nigga don't know what smart contract be

[Anonymous No.49898263]

>>49898005
Nigga they need tokens for collateral how else they gon run the jobs, sayin smart contract in this context don't mean shit
If they just be usin their own collateral why the heck they gon be a pool too

[Anonymous No.49898770]

>>49898263
Is u dumb or is u just pretending nigboi? You can loan out your linkies via a smart contract to a node and in the smart contract you can for example define the time of the loan, the % of returns, which addresses your linkies can go to as well as a specified time when they go back to your wallet. All automated, all definitive, no trust needed.
Meanwhile you switch your LINK for LPL for a PROMISE on a return.
That shit weak.
That shit contrary to the whole point of smart contracts.
That shit gonna get you scammed.
In fact you better get yo LINK back because once staking goes live linkpool kikes ain't gonna give you shit back.

[Anonymous No.49898785]

>>49894805
You exchange LINK (oil) for LPL (the established well).

[Anonymous No.49898851]

>>49898770
cringe

[Anonymous No.49900018]

>>49898785
for now...

[Anonymous No.49900086]

>>49898770
You're forgetting that most of us LPL holders also bought LINK under $1 and can fill out our LINK allotments without buying more of anything.
Literally all the things you stated are going to be a part of every LINK staking pool, including Linkpool. You're retarded.

[Anonymous No.49900298]

>>49900018
chink nig kike spic jew whqtever the fuck you arehear this: you are not exchanging LINK for LPL

your staking LINK on the Linkpool node and getting paid in LINK

You own your LINK and own your LPL

Jesus fucking christ i'm done.

[Anonymous No.49900357]

>>49895962
check out this post from them from 2019
https://medium.com/linkpool/creating-trustless-pools-and-staking-for-all-266451277e3f
>ctrl + f "eth"

[Anonymous No.49900393]

>>49900357
>>49895962
>https://medium.com/linkpool/creating-trustless-pools-and-staking-for-all-266451277e3f
>This means that in the future, rather than our staking app being a central place to stake tokens on LinkPool for Chainlink, you’ll be able to browse many pools. Pools that could be for ETH, pools that can be for DAOs or ICOs like mentioned above. The staking app will become a hub of everything that is poolable, giving a catalogue of trustless implementations that any user can see as an opportunity.
>The staking app will become a hub of everything that is poolable
pools closed

[Anonymous No.49900541]

>>49900357
I see.

So shill me this: If Linkpool is the "pool of pools" then technically staking v0.01 could be opened up to multiple nodes each getting a portion of the initial 25m LINK stake allotment. This means that not only do LPL holders get a portion fees from Linkpools own jobs we will alos get a portion of the "pooling contract" fees and NAAS right from the start.

[Anonymous No.49900559]

>>49900298
NOOOOOOOOOOO its one or the other you can't just win on both!

[Anonymous No.49901387]

>>49900541
that is why i own a bunch of linkpool. seems very plausible to me fren, and we dont have to wait much longer to find out

[Anonymous No.49901530]

UPDATE- the person cancelled their withdrawal of 146k LPL. (remember they also have 130k LINK on bancor). Looks like the think bancor will survive this situation, time will tell

[Anonymous No.49901678]

>>49900541
Tes, but what %age? And in the long run, will it be more profitable than simply holding Link? Also remember that the Link token will likely moon. Is there any reason to believe the LPL token will match this? The numbers aren't clear at all, and who's to say competitors might not move in swiftly and destroy Linkpool's function? Very risky desu

[Anonymous No.49901827]

>>49901678
>move quickly to have direct ties to the Chainlink team for over two years

[Anonymous No.49901903]

>>49901530
they will

[Anonymous No.49902356]

>>49901530

So it was a nothingburger as usual

/thread

[Anonymous No.49902620]

>>49902356
We scared Mat into keeping his risk with Bancor instead of taking a haircut. Lmao
Good on OP for bringing light to it, the advantage of the transparency of Blockchain, and the community's reaction.

[Anonymous No.49903231]

>>49901530
Lmao just gives me more time to buy, and I'm not gonna sell it back

[Anonymous No.49903418]

>>49903231
based, and looks like he canceled the withdrawal in response to bancors latest update. Bancor seems to think they can come back from this... LOL