ICP scam

[Anonymous No.49839758]

ICP always deliver who is shorting this pump? Won't close my short till this shit coin hit 3 cents

[Anonymous No.49839805]

ICP is a scam and Moonman is a scammer.

[Anonymous No.49839884]

>>49839758
DO NOT REDEEM SIRS DO NOT REDEEM THE ICP TOKEN

[Anonymous No.49840389]

>>49839758
r1b vcs will fill my pockets trust the plan

[Anonymous No.49840566]

>>49839758
It's just an ethereum clone with a gay name and a logo with a homosex color scheme

[Anonymous No.49840600]

>>49840566
ETH cant host websites, if you're gonna FUD at least educate yourself, retard.

[Anonymous No.49840732]

>>49840600
ICP can't either

[Anonymous No.49840775]

As a senior software engineer ICP gives off some red flags for me and here's why:
ICP at its very core uses something called Web Assembly (WASM)

WASM was born in Web 2.0 way before ICP was born and it was made in theory to boost web performance by providing a portable code format to run in browsers at native speeds. Sounds good in theory right? Well WASM never gained traction and it heavily flopped, no one is using it today because JavaScript is just that much more convenient and faster to prototype with as well

The creators of ICP thought: What if we try to revive WASM but with a blockchain meme sauce layer on top by bringing it over to Web 3.0 and present it as some sort of revolutionary paradigm? Well it worked for them seeing how it lured brainlets from /biz/ and half of India into investing into it so kudos to them for pulling this off

So why did WASM flop? That's because JavaScript is easy to write, and Web Assembly isn’t even intended to be written by humans, plus its most efficient code is generated by C or C++ source code, which isn’t for everyone either

The only thing WASM has going for it is being able to do heavy-duty tasks on the web, but we have things like GLSL for that

There is this truism that technology never dies

Most big bank, airline, credit, and other very large systems still run on COBOL or other mainframe-era technologies.
In my line of work I still encounter VB6, PowerBuilder, and other 1990’s-era technologies powering mission-critical systems

Knowing this fact, I think it's highly unlikely that the usage of the ICP blockchain will be adopted into the mainstream seeing how even Web 2.0 failed to adopt it

The theory behind ICP was neat, but they forgot to take into account the actual reality/practice

ICP was dead on arrival because it bets on the wrong horse as evident by its chart

You need a blockchain project that can convince current traditional companies to switch over and this is just not it

No adoption = No project

[Anonymous No.49840873]

>>49840775
God I hate this pasta. I always enjoy a good pasta but this one is just pseudoscientific and gay.

[Anonymous No.49840874]

>>49840732
you're a fudding pajeet

[Anonymous No.49840890]

>>49839758
LE INTERNET COMPUTER

[Anonymous No.49840990]

Lmao you pathetic racists never fail to make me laugh with your "icp cope" threads
Face it, most shitcoins will be infinitely more successful than any of you sad virgins ever will be. You are on the wrong side of history, get over it losers

[Anonymous No.49841010]

>>49840775
>You need a blockchain project that can convince current traditional companies to switch over and this is just not it

It might be pasta but this point still stands

[Anonymous No.49841316]

>>49841010

[Anonymous No.49841518]

>>49839758
Why does your chart say $2 if you think 3 cents is the bottom?

[Anonymous No.49843035]

>>49841518
The new bottom is $0.03 and the new pump is only gonna hit $50

[Anonymous No.49843209]

>>49839758
Nigger