HAPPENING THREAD

[Anonymous No.49828404]

BANCOR 3 COLLAPSE IMMENENT

[Anonymous No.49828440]

>>49828404
lmao

[Anonymous No.49828455]

They stopped deposits too. Can't find any word from the devs about this

[Anonymous No.49828490]

>>49828455
very decentralized indeed

[Anonymous No.49828677]

>>49828455
Checked. Anything on twitter about this? Checked my usual defi bears and they haven't picked it up yet

[Anonymous No.49828714]

>>49828677
they just posted about it on discord now. theres live twitter talk starting in a few minutes
https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1RDGlgrVoWOKL?s=20

[Anonymous No.49828731]

>>49828714
https://blog.bancor.network/market-conditions-update-june-19-2022-e5b857b39336

[Anonymous No.49828751]

people want to receive 80% BNT back instead of LINK... its the future!

[Anonymous No.49828784]

>>49828751
Of which the BNT price is down 20% by the time you can actually dump it. More like permanent loss.

[Anonymous No.49828836]

with jews you ____

[Anonymous No.49828840]

>>49828404
>BANCOR 3 COLLAPSE IMMENENT
yes bobo. ok bobo. here, bobo, take it.

[Anonymous No.49828933]

Twitter live:

>doing it to stop a liquidation/run on the protocol
>situation has deteriorated since thursday
>"hostile antagonists"
>"uncomfortable decision"
>"ethical to protect users"
>"we're disappointed with our industry"
>"if we did nothing the protocol would be handed over to an antagonist."
>"instituational economic attack"
>"we've taken their weapons away from them"

lol, they're dead

[Anonymous No.49828948]

>>49828840
>pshek

[Anonymous No.49828961]

>>49828933
Juneteenth will be bloody

[Anonymous No.49828987]

>>49828933
stopping users from withdrawing money is also taking the antagonists' weapons away?

big cohencidence!

[Anonymous No.49828991]

>>49828933
Can someone translate from corporate speak to normal human speak?

[Anonymous No.49829035]

Kek we just keep Fucking killing these!

>Terra
>Celsius
>Babel
>3AC
>Bancor3

Just Fucking wracking up the kills!

[Anonymous No.49829070]

>>49828991
Sounds like they're basically exit scamming to me.

[Anonymous No.49829137]

>>49829035
I want to add Binance to this list.

Your funds are safu

[Anonymous No.49829142]

>>49828731
Thanks. Fuck these fags. There has never been an organically profitable DEX.

[Anonymous No.49829152]

DeFi is a daydream predicated on the naive belief that human beings aren't in fact, inately greedy, self-serving creatures, when history and simple observation would tell you we are.

DeFi as a concept won't even exist in 5 years, for the same reason everything eventually reverts to a central regulating authority. Fact is, we as people need protection from ourselves.

[Anonymous No.49829211]

DeFi

[Anonymous No.49829251]

>>49829152
A defi can be regulated jeets to protect our security and our assets. Otto blockchain is a kyc compliant blockchain. Users must undergo kyc to before accessing the product.

[Anonymous No.49829281]

>>49828404
BANCONNEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE-

[Anonymous No.49829293]

>>49828731
thank you anon

[Anonymous No.49829505]

>>49828836
Win. Nazi cocksucker you are going to end up carbonized like Azov fags

[Anonymous No.49829556]

>These costs have been amplified by the recent insolvency of two large centralized entities who were key beneficiaries of BNT liquidity mining rewards as long-time LPs in Bancor V2.1. To cover their liabilities, these entities have rapidly liquidated their BNT positions and withdrawn large sums of liquidity from the system, while an unknown entity has opened a large short position on the BNT token on an external exchange.

Translation: The premine VC whales get made whole while we short our users into the ground to get something to walk away with. This is why taking VC funds should be seen as willful suicide by any project.

[Anonymous No.49829588]

Where do I short this shit?

[Anonymous No.49829664]

>>49828404
What collapse? Post your short big boy. They paused IL, so any pieces of shit trying to rape the protocol at the worst possible time is getting BTFO.

[Anonymous No.49829745]

>>49829137
this

[Anonymous No.49830310]

>>49829035
Celsius is purely centralised. I'd go for DeFi like Equilibrium where we can utilize their lending protocol with the lowest collateral rate.

[Anonymous No.49831333]

Do these retards not understand that they are causing a bank run on their protocol? Everyone is going to assume everyone else is withdrawing which would nuke their folios as Bancor plummets and IL kicks in. Everyone is going to rush for the exit and the last people out will lose almost everything.

Absolutely incredible

[Anonymous No.49831470]

>>49831333
It's a last ditch move in desperation, the bank run was already well underway.

[Anonymous No.49831578]

>>49829664
>BNT holder

[Anonymous No.49831695]

>>49828404
Freeway is standing still despite of the market's crash. Been staking my assets there for 20-43% fixed apy. People who backlash gets what they deserve.

[Anonymous No.49831846]

>>49828455
so, my losses will be permanent now?

[Anonymous No.49832016]

>launches ponzi v3 during a crash
>pikachuface

[Anonymous No.49832031]

>>49831846
Kek

[Anonymous No.49832119]

The twitter space made it sound like they're going to put something in place to limit the amount of withdrawals so they can also limit inflation.
Imagine they try to limit inflation to 10% a year, so you have to wait 5 - 10 years for your waiting period to be over. KEK

[Anonymous No.49832245]

>>49830310
>>49831695
Kys jeets

[Anonymous No.49832504]

>>49832016
I'd better play a game and own nfts and an assets. Honeyland will provide a better opportunity to everyone here.

[Anonymous No.49833046]

>>49829142
gns...

[Anonymous No.49833222]

>>49829251
Defi regulation will begin soon whether we like it or not. Kolnet's CEO is also open for this discussion. It's better to be secured than sorry.

[Anonymous No.49833241]

>>49833046
What is that???

[Anonymous No.49833768]

>>49829556
REKT REKT

[Anonymous No.49833957]

>>49829035
I wish sbf and ftx would get destroyed in this process too. But highly unlikely

[Anonymous No.49833980]

>>49828933

Basically Bancor is a decentralised platform anyone can deposit liquidity to.
In that sense, even a big faggot Cefi platform called Celcius can deposit massive funds and take part
Celsius did in fact do this.

Now Celcius is in trouble they decided they could make some money by exploiting the fact they still have a huge proportion of the liquidity on there and short BNT, then withdraw all their liquidity and dump the BNT they get to profit their shorts and destroy all confidence in the platform.
Bancor decided to at least try stop Celcius from making money if BNT is going to be sacrificed anyway.

[Anonymous No.49833999]

>>49829035

Dont forget Huu

[Anonymous No.49834020]

ACTION STATIONS ACTION STATIONS SET CONDITION RED AROUND THE SHIP ACTION STATIONS ACTION STATIONS THIS IS NOT A DRILL

[Anonymous No.49834029]

>>49831846
Oh, no, not the Bancorinos!
>They’re stopping the withdrawal and sale of bancorinos. Might as well have said freezing withdrawals (retroactively). But you can hodl, check their reserves and hope they don’t steal customer assets and go somewhere without extradition, like Israel.

[Anonymous No.49834036]

>>49829505

[Anonymous No.49834082]

>>49828404
>Bancor has been around since early 2016
>does nothing
>collapse of Bancor by the same group who took down Terra and Celsius
i guess Bancor did have a use case, to further crash the market

[Anonymous No.49834112]

1/3 of my stuff is in Celsius. Another 1/3 in Bancor. 1/3 in a Ledger. I just wanted to earn more interest than the 0.08% my shitty bank offers me and now I am getting JUSTED like you wouldn't believe. Picrel.

[Anonymous No.49834402]

>>49829152
Chainlink solves this.

[Anonymous No.49834412]

>>49828731
>The need to pause IL protection is a result of the recent sell-off of rewards emissions that were accumulated over the last 18 months. BNT rewards effectively have a double-cost:

>They depreciate the BNT value, resulting in impermanent loss on the network.
>This IL is compensated with additional BNT emissions, causing further value depreciation.
So they are pausing IL Protection because protocol is working as designed?

[Anonymous No.49834441]

>>49828404
wtf is a bancor

[Anonymous No.49834457]

>>49832119
midwit here. whats wrong with that?

[Anonymous No.49834521]

>>49834457
Nothing if you don't mind never being able to withdraw your assets ever again

[Anonymous No.49836282]

>>49829152
>everything eventually reverts to a central regulating authority
the reverse is also true

[Anonymous No.49836311]

>>49833957
>Alameda first to get out of stETH, sending Celsius into death spiral
they are the Jews jewing Jews

[Anonymous No.49836716]

>>49834112
i don't know why you left it there. i didn't migrate to v3 because i couldn't see the upside to it. got 100% of my link back from v2. if you're in v2, just get out

[Anonymous No.49836774]

>>49836716
the team disabled withdrawing from v2 this morning
i had literally left my link there assuming that i could get out if there were issues
but they uniliaterally changed the contracts

[Anonymous No.49836806]

>>49828404
That's what you get for buying into a kike scam.

[Anonymous No.49836996]

>>49831333

Of course they are aware of this. They wouldn't it if they had any other option.

[Anonymous No.49837023]

bancor is rated as the safest defi protocol though, this is fake news

[Anonymous No.49837029]

So can i wthdraw if I just migrate my link to v3 that's currently in v2?

[Anonymous No.49837073]

>>49837029
less than half of it if you're quick and v3 doesn't collapse during your 7 day cooldown

[Anonymous No.49837112]

>>49837073
Why the fuck would the IL be that high if you only deposited in May when link was the same price and bnt was $1.20
The IL should be like 5%

[Anonymous No.49837117]

>>49833222

If you are regulated there will be no way for the protocols to do insane shit and ther goes your yield. If you remove the ponzionomics from defi then you also can't make money.

[Anonymous No.49837144]

So after looking at the wallets it's kind of crazy how large Bancor's liquidity was just Celsius.

From a game theory perspective, Celsius just has to eat the loss. They risk killing the protocol if they try to wait out for ILP to return. That being said Celsius' defi team is run by retards who will probably do just that.

[Anonymous No.49837200]

>>49837144

Its quite quickly becoming obvious Celcius are running around every corner of crypto trying to set up jewish tricks to salvage money in desperation. They probably opened mega shorts on BTC before they even announced their forced hold policy. We exposed them in Chainlink over the past few days.

They are cooked. Even Bancor just disabled impermanent loss to fuck them. Other whales are increasingly noticing their trails everywhere imo. They are gonna get hunted and sucked dry of everything as they do increasingly risky bets. First with LINK which they quickly tried to hide and not BNT.

If they wait out the IMpL to be reinstated they’ll likely just get short squeezed on their BNT shorts. They are toast

[Anonymous No.49837260]

>>49837200
everyone is exposed to everyone else in Crypto right now....the same funds have been loaned and re-loaned and then probably re-loaned again, pumping the bubble ever larger

it won't take much more to unravel the whole thing

[Anonymous No.49837309]

>>49837260

It seems from what ive been reading that Celcius are basically running around shorting or setting up shorts for everything that they hold a substantial amount of (previously collateral), which, is basically the same mass collateral all the other VCs and Cefi kikes used all bullrun.
It looks like hes betting on a mega crash in the next days or preying, or organising it(i doubt it, clearly they are all out to fuck each other now).

[Anonymous No.49837364]

>>49837073
It currently says 0$ protected liquidity despite having 1k link on there, if I click migrate to v3 then it shows 0 link being able to move over. RIP - lucky that was a small portion of my stack

[Anonymous No.49837493]

>>49829137
Big Brain Chink's Magic Casino will be the only exchange standing at the end of the bear

[Anonymous No.49837632]

>>49833999
Literally Huu

[Anonymous No.49837750]

>>49834521
Dead, soulless eyes.

[Anonymous No.49839400]

>>49828991
"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH"

[Anonymous No.49840517]

>>49836774
>but they uniliaterally changed the contracts
Future of finance indeed, cryptoniggers.

[Anonymous No.49840831]

>>49829035
Don't forget Solana/Solend.

[Anonymous No.49841009]

>>49828404
Isn’t it but odd that the IL protection could’ve liquidated Celsius shorts on link and got disabled? Look like Jews are pretending to be eating each other, but Really they are eating their user

[Anonymous No.49841099]

>>49829137
I want Binance to die so their paper monero (((tricks))) can come to an end. They might be a little more resilient than the other things listed though.

[Anonymous No.49841214]

>>49833980
While endlessly spammed by shills, they have still failed to provide any semblance of Celsius shorting BNT
Any screenshots? Any on-chain proof? Nothing
This accusation makes even less sense when you realize Celsius doesn't have the funds to pull something like that off. They are just trying to get their funds back whenever they can and cut their losses

As far as Im concerned, all Celsius did was try to get out of the pool, something perfectly within their rights
This gave the slimy little Bancor devs the perfect (and last) opportunity to trick the goyim: It is Celsius! They are shorting us! We have no proof but you can trust us! We have to protect you from this attack (???), we have no other option!

Celsius shouldn't let them off the hook, they should sue Bancor for defamation and fraud
It will be kikibowl, the civil war of the tribe. Whoever wins gets their customers foreskins

[Anonymous No.49841286]

>>49828404
On all platforms, protocols and chains, every single one of these yield senpaitachi issues a token as a reward that serves no purpose other than to sell.
Meaning price trends to zero.
Yield is meaningless.
By definition is a ponzi.
Great if you get in esrly and bail after about 2 weeks.
Prove me wrong.

[Anonymous No.49841397]

>>49828455
https://blog.bancor.network/market-conditions-update-june-19-2022-e5b857b39336
>Deposits are currently not accepted to prevent confusion via direct contract interaction where the information on paused protection is not visible.
lmao

[Anonymous No.49841676]

>>49841397
>bancor stops people from giving them money
>/biz/ tries to spin it as a bad thing

[Anonymous No.49841777]

>>49836774
holy smoke, I withdrew my link 2 days ago from v2.1 "just in case". Best decision I've ever made

[Anonymous No.49842182]

>90% of V3 ETH in withdrawal wallet
>90% of V3 LINK in withdrawal wallet
>75% of V3 DAI in withdrawal wallet
>if all of these withdrawals complete, BNT liquidity will be <$40mm
>any sells will crater the price
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

[Anonymous No.49842447]

>>49841777
Checked u got lucky stinky

[Anonymous No.49842495]

>>49842182
So? The platform literally doesn't depend on what BNT price is.

[Anonymous No.49842514]

>>49842495
How does IL protection work in the scenario where BNT is 99% down?

[Anonymous No.49842554]

>>49842514
They literally print more. Only thing i don't get is why such little token is being paid out, IL is never that much.

[Anonymous No.49842880]

>>49834020
>Belay that order Geata!
>and instead set phasers to PARTY!

[Anonymous No.49843098]

>>49833222
You realize that something decentralized can’t be regulated right? None of these are decentralized if a central body can just pause it

[Anonymous No.49843155]

>>49843098
You do realize smart contracts all have governance systems? Decentralized doesn't mean it's immutable.

[Anonymous No.49843414]

>>49828404
did the spreadsheets since the bancor announcement (just 15 hours ago)
~60k LINK already withdrawn
~900k LINK in initiated withdrawals
~160k LINK of initiated withdrawals cancelled
165 transactions in 15 hours

note that before this shitstorm, the "normal" was roughly 4-8 transactions per day

what i get out of this situation is that people want to get out of there so bad, they are ready to lose 50% of their stacks
they have 0 trust on the platform and i can't say i blame them

[Anonymous No.49843519]

>>49843414
someone witdrew 10k ETH 8 hours ago, losing 4k eth to the IL

[Anonymous No.49843548]

>>49842514
it doesn't lol, it's the death spiral/hyperinflation scenario people talked about
BNT was already on the verge of it before this shitstorm, but now basically everyone wants out of their platform

[Anonymous No.49844051]

>>49843548
BNT gets burnt like crazy so posting a one-sided minted chat is extremely disingenuous

[Anonymous No.49844196]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09WB4clBYMI&t=1911s

[Anonymous No.49844364]

holy shit a bancor just flew over my house

[Anonymous No.49844388]

I'm starting to turn a bit bearish on Chainlink, given how they have associated themselves with DeFi

[Anonymous No.49844447]

>>49828404
What are the odds Bancor survives this? Should I buy BNT when it hits a penny, or will it pull a Luna?

[Anonymous No.49844637]

>>49844051
crazy burns bro

[Anonymous No.49844682]

>>49844447
Bancor will survive now that they've halted IL payouts, but every time they try to restart IL payouts there will be another run, and so on.
So they can survive indefinitely without paying IL, but uh, Bancor without IL protection is a nothingburger without fries.

[Anonymous No.49844732]

>>49844637
you do realize your own picture shows the minted % decreasing over the years in proportion to the burnt%?

[Anonymous No.49844757]

>>49829281
This

[Anonymous No.49844787]

>>49829152
Okay oligarch commie, please leave thanks

[Anonymous No.49844815]

>>49844732
could it have anything to do with the LM rewards being reduced over time and eventually abolished?
could it be that now that there's nothing that prints BNT but ILP, 55% minting vs 44% burning is unsustainable? could it be that these burns being "le crazy" is delusional?

>>49843548
could it be that BNT basically shutted everything down precisely because even with 44% burning there would be hyperinflation of the token?

[Anonymous No.49844834]

>>49828404
They’ll be fine lol, functioning as intended and also not created by them - Celsius and greedy scaredy cats are just doing whales bidding

[Anonymous No.49844980]

>have 4k Link on Bancor v3, 1/4 of my stack
>the rest is in cold storage
>been on vacation for a few days only got back today
Be honest am I fucked? I'll buy more now while it's cheap and regard this as an expensive lesson.

[Anonymous No.49845001]

>>49844388
this is even funnier when you realize that at some point they probably will turn to this fud as a last resort

[Anonymous No.49845009]

>>49844682
kek

[Anonymous No.49845093]

>>49845001
ngl, witnessing this entire space imploding right before our eyes has been euphoric
but I was not memeing about being bearish on Chainlink

[Anonymous No.49845329]

>>49845093
The problem isn’t really Bancor, it’s Celsius. If the retards that gave their money to Celsius would have simply staked on Bancor instead, they would still have their money and we would not be in this situation today.

[Anonymous No.49845395]

>>49845329
That's disingenuous, anon. Celsius allows for much more of an "insta-bank run" situation because they can pul lots of people's money en masse, but the reality is that the Bancor design simply couldn't handle large whales leaving the protocol and the attendant panic that would cause during peak bear fear.
And if your protocol can't handle that then honestly it can't make it. DeFi is darwinian as fuck and the shit that actually survives needs to survive through anything, at which point it will earn massive respect as being invincible. Bancor failed the test.

[Anonymous No.49845428]

>>49845329
Getting into v2 bancor was impossible. Fuck you.

[Anonymous No.49845430]

>>49845395

this is correct.
you can't design your protocol for good times only and get surprised at the notion that markets are cyclical and people panic.

[Anonymous No.49845432]

>>49845329
lol no
there would have been no functional difference

bnt employees even tried to blame the LINK community for withdrawing before they decided to formally blame celsius
they are just kikes desperately trying to find something to blame to avoid the reality that their protocol failed organically

[Anonymous No.49845442]

>defi is the future

[Anonymous No.49845604]

>>49845442
>defi
>decentralized finance
>but the smart contracts can be edited at any time by the devs
>they can even get control of your contract wallet if necessary
>"governance" that gives voting power based on staking governance tokens
>decentralized
>finance
no thanks ill pass

[Anonymous No.49845638]

>>49831846
My friend your losses were merely another sacrifice on the road to crypto dominance! Like the man who bought a pizza for 10,000 bitcoin

[Anonymous No.49845806]

>>49837023
>bro these MBS are AAA rated by Moody's and S&P, they'll never go to zero

[Anonymous No.49846854]

>>49837750
They are the eyes of someone who follows the words of the Talmud to the letter.

[Anonymous No.49847345]

>>49837309
It feels like a death match now
All these organizations have to kill Celsius before Celsius kills them
Or at least they have to defend themselves long enough for Celsius to starve to death

[Anonymous No.49847732]

>>49834020
Why the hell is he wearing that tanktop??

[Anonymous No.49848602]

>>49844447
Unfortunately, none of them is going to make it. I will be buying more of RFOX, SAND and VRA if I were you. They are metaverse blue chips that channers are sleeping on it.

[Anonymous No.49849396]

when did you get out of bancor lads?
i got out 4 weeks ago. saw some horrifying shit, basically gave up on it

as i was explaining my thoughts here, some bancor shill was desperately trying to convince me that i was being retarded, that the redflags that i perceived were nothing serious and that i was getting out of it shortly before it was about to take off
i really hope that guy loses everything. bancor shills have consistently proven themselves to be the most cancerous group of people festering this place

[Anonymous No.49850275]

>>49849396
>that the redflags that i perceived were nothing serious and that i was getting out of it shortly before it was about to take off
thank god i'm too dumb and risk averse to put anything in defi shit
what were the red flags you'd noticed though? I'd be curious to keep an eye out years from now (if defi ever actually recovers from shit similar to BNT changing their withdrawals, or shit like SOLEND literally outright hijacking user's funds)

[Anonymous No.49850382]

>>49833980
THIS.
Question is, does BANCOR survive? Its much different than LUNA
Should I long or short it and to what leverage?

[Anonymous No.49850497]

>>49841214
Bancor clearly said Celsius is shorting their BNT patouts, they said it last night during their twitter space. in like the first 5 minutes. "they have failed to provide semblance bc i need to be spoonfed everything"

[Anonymous No.49850616]

>>49850275
the 7 day thing by itself screamed "ponzi". just getting money into the platform locked you for 7 days, you didn't even have to stake
they constantly advertised incoming "features" all throughout 2021, but never delivered on a single one of them. they were basically cultivating hype out of nothing. arbitrum ended up being an empty promise, v3 was delayed again and again all the way to after 2022

people started getting their stacks back in BNT (that was easily the worst one). as time went on, the percentage of BNT increased
v3 promised a myriad of improvements, including auto-coumpouding, 1-click migration of all positions and 50-100x reduction of trade fees. needless to say, it had none of those mechanics

basically if you ever see a team being "too active" on social media despite little to 0 progress, if you see notice debatable mechanics that inconvenience users and don't really make much sense economically (like "locked funds" periods) and if you notice active degradation of the mechanics, get out of there
and get the FUCK out of there if you notice APYs that feel "too good" or wording like "100% safe" or "guaranteed/risk-free"

[Anonymous No.49850762]

>investing in a jewish ponzi scheme

You deserve to lose money.
Wake me up when blockchain is used for real stuff.

[Anonymous No.49850797]

>>49850616
What was their reasoning for 7 day wsiting period, if its a smart contract why coudmt you just enter and exit at will?
Usually a waiting period means they are trying to discourage people from leaving, encourage them to stay in

[Anonymous No.49850811]

>>49850762
So never?

[Anonymous No.49850854]

>>49850797
It’s a security feature

[Anonymous No.49850866]

thank you for playing sir.

[Anonymous No.49850986]

>>49828404
you know for a system built on the premise that you should always have access to your funds it sure is hard af to have access to your funds

[Anonymous No.49851095]

>>49837200
This

[Anonymous No.49851125]

>>49850986
kek
even when im getting utterly destroyed i still come on /biz/ and get a laugh. thanks for easing the pain and ripping on me bros

[Anonymous No.49851361]

>>49850382
>Its much different than LUNA
>when to stabilize value, it prints more
>making death spirals possible
nah idk about that

[Anonymous No.49851598]

>>49850616
what does arbitrum have to do with bancor?

[Anonymous No.49851824]

>>49851646
>>49851646

>>49851646

[Anonymous No.49851852]

>>49828404
OH NO NO NO I MEMBER WHEN THEY TOLD BANCOR WAS SAFE.

[Anonymous No.49851922]

>>49851598
defi in general, and especially bancor had absurd fees in 2021. sometimes you would have to pay 800$ for a mere deposit
bancor hyped implementing arbitrum to keep the users in, with the promise of 50x-100x lower fees
in reality they ended up never using it, presumably because by the time it became possible fees were already at an "acceptable" level and they figured that it wasn't worth the risk in case of a black swan event

[Anonymous No.49852082]

>>49834412
Kek this

[Anonymous No.49852131]

>>49833980
>Bancor decided to at least try stop Celcius from making money if BNT is going to be sacrificed anyway.
but if BNT is tanking Celsius makes money
>>49841214
kek, that's the pattern with you market manipulating shills, >muh proof
You're going to jail buddy, market manipulation is illegal and you're being documented
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x5455a52b523784775b09595879b91e1a0fce6bc0fa3b4b17d4e0efdee54d1698
Same Celsius account that deposited 6M LINK

[Anonymous No.49852216]

Check this out
>>49850388
>>49850388
>>49851646
>>49851646
>>49852045
>>49852045
..

[Anonymous No.49852611]

>>49841777
checked, me too. based biz threads saving my linkies

[Anonymous No.49854048]

>>49852216
>risk-free
>those yield
Who the fuck are they trying to trick?
Some dementia boomer?

[Anonymous No.49854149]

>>49829137
He made a post saying he’s hiring while everyone else is freezing, laying off, or going bankrupt.
I just hope Gemini survives because I have $150k just chilling on it

[Anonymous No.49854199]

>>49829035
Dunk?

[Anonymous No.49854663]

>>49854149
It's going down just because you said that

[Anonymous No.49855184]

>>49850275
good points, ty

[Anonymous No.49855622]

>>49854149
trust in the winklevoss boys.

[Anonymous No.49855724]

>>49841286

Fringe Finance ($FRIN) Read whitepaper.

[Anonymous No.49856741]

>>49828991
A jew jewed me btw I'm a jew

[Anonymous No.49856760]

>>49829035
It's racking but I like your creativity

[Anonymous No.49856781]

>betting against jews
>ever
It's like nobody has ever learned anything

[Anonymous No.49856797]

>>49829556
Just ask Lopp

[Anonymous No.49856856]

>>49828991
>corporate speak
that's not corporate speak, that's scammer speak

[Anonymous No.49857042]

>>49850497
>Bancor clearly said Celsius is shorting their BNT patouts
oh my fucking god now the word of kikes is infallible gahahahahaha
i ask him for proof and he quotes a kike lmao
how about you try again with a transaction hash you filthy jew?

and fyi, ive heard it. the guy didn't even directly call out celsius for the short (only for the withdrawal). maybe he implied it, since as a kike he wants plausible deniability (tricks the goyim into believing his lie, didn't truly call out celsius to be vulnerable to defamation charges)

>>49852131
finally some fucking proof
it may be confusing to your kind kike, but your word is not the word of god
maybe in your schizo religion you are gods chosen, but in reality you are pic related
but yeah thanks for posting it, now i believe that celsius is indeed shorting bnt
>You're going to jail buddy
kek maybe in your dreams shlomo
>"noooooo you can't short my token waaaaahhhhhhhhh"

[Anonymous No.49857080]

the word cooldown is a red flag in itself wtf is this

[Anonymous No.49857095]

it's hilarious to me that israeli unit 8200 tech vc firms are the ones about to crash the entire crypto market
whoever's writing this show sucks, it's not even believable. too on-the-nose

[Anonymous No.49857128]

>>49856856
Same shit

[Anonymous No.49857134]

>>49833980
so am i gonna be able to cash out or nah?

[Anonymous No.49857173]

>doubling linkies
Send me 1000 link and ill send back 1000000. Trust trade me :)

[Anonymous No.49857255]

>>49851852
kek
Imagine traveling back to /biz/ one year ago and trying to warn everyone here about this
Nobody would believe

[Anonymous No.49857430]

Why do people put their life savings on exchanges run by inexperienced devs?