Kadena Exposed - Why it's a scam

[Anonymous No.49577170]

I have come across extremely damning information which basically ends Kadenas entire value proposition.

>For people who were unaware,
Kadena claims it solved the scaling problem of cryptocurrencies, the way they explained this actually sounds reasonable, extremely reasonable if I might add, to keep it simple, they claimed they figured out a way to scale horizontally by increasing the amount of chains, this sounds like anyone could do it but the way Kadena was special was the fact that each chain was as secure as every other one, basically keeping security consistent across unlimited numbers of chains - frankly, a crazy statement. People here thought they were geniuses for finding this out before researchers and huge hedge funds. See if you didn't know, most of the VCs in this space are backing Proof of Stake systems which have been proven to not be very scalable, secure or decentralized for that matter, having to scale via L2, centralizing block production and congesting L1. So it was understandable when kadena came along and claimed it could scale L1 and not fall for the PoS meme.

>Here is where things fall apart though.
Kadena claims you can run subsets of the network on multiple nodes, also a crazy innovation, in other "sharded" chains you might need to run the entire network on a single node but with KDA you should be able to split up your node and run any amount of chains on any amount of nodes, this was supposed to help with resources like bandwidth and node requirements for each instance.
Turns out this is a lie.
They have no solution for this problem, this is in fact an unsolved research problem. Has been for quiet a while now, which is why I was surpised to hear them talk about it, see I have a PhD in cloud architecture and distributed systems, I work at Nintendo. So It wasn't hard for me to look through this. It's probably also the reason why VCs and Researchers have not heard of Kadena yet. And likely never will, I'm sorry if you fell for it.

[Anonymous No.49577285]

>Run subbnets on multiple nodes
So like ICP except POW so it will be banned.

[Official good thread seal of quality No.49577346]

>>49577170

[Anonymous No.49577404]

>>49577285
Actually, not true, ICP is more likely to get banned, PoS and it's equivalences have way more regulatory problems, I know this because before my current job at Nindendo I worked as lead reseacher for the SEC.
To keep it simple, regulations will easily apply to any staking design that designates distinct parties who participate in the deterministic confirmation of a given transaction.
Staking designs put validators at risk of being subject to money transmitter regulation and enforcement as their unique identity and funds are essential to the effectuation of transfers in the system

PoW doesn't have this problem.

[Anonymous No.49577497]

>>49577404
But does Kadena have blast processing?

[Anonymous No.49577511]

>>49577404
So, what you are saying is, that nintendo is going into crypto?

[Anonymous No.49577577]

>>49577511
>>49577497
I can't talk about that.

[Anonymous No.49577717]

>>49577577
mmhhmmm can't talk about secret stuff on an anonymous board.

what was your favourite starter pokemon?

[Anonymous No.49578076]

Sisters… is this true? Should I sell? We’re so far down from ATH it doesn seem worth but I’m still up by 110% from my initial right now I could at least make some money

[Anonymous No.49578095]

>>49577170
>Turns out this is a lie.
Says who?

[Anonymous No.49578119]

>I work at Nintendo. So It wasn't hard for me to look through this
I'm retarded

[Anonymous No.49578132]

>>49578119
I'm having so much fun rn

[Anonymous No.49578137]

>>49578076
lol, i'd sell at least some, this is going to continue, and if it isn't going to continue much further, BTC is going to chill, range and accumulate while alts are going to bleed.

[Anonymous No.49578159]

>>49578119
get owned KDA tranny

[Anonymous No.49578161]

>>49577170
this was talked about in bitcoin forum years ago anyone who fell for this is a moron.

[Anonymous No.49578226]

Watching the BTC/ETH ratio gives me joy. When flippening?

[Anonymous No.49578307]

>>49577170
Lol
Lmao

KDA is the only chain primed for success, particularly after its been hinted that PoS chains will be classified as a security, and they haven’t taken off to be considered “fully decentralized”. PoS cucks are going to be stripped off everything they have. By the time money starts to flow back into actual value and tech propositions like KDA all these ADA,EVM-copypaste chains baggies will have had their blood drained till the last drop, rendering insolvent to board the one true ship to blockchain scalability.

Don’t say you weren’t warned. Retards like you were BTFO during the summer, where actual tech discussion took place.

[Anonymous No.49578328]

>>49577170
>basically keeping security consistent across unlimited numbers of chains - frankly, a crazy statement.

Yeah indeed, it's crazy, as in utter trash. What the fuck does this even mean? Yeah you can scale a blockchain through side-chains, doh! That's being done all over the place, also known as sharding. The problem with sharding is that there are high frequency interlinks, like Uniswap, that need to basically interact with all shards and still hold most of the network volume, so you are back at square one basically. Sharding isn't a final solution, it's a band-aid.

[Anonymous No.49578376]

>>49578328
>Yeah you can scale a blockchain through side-chains, doh
>side-chains
Chainweb isn't sidechains.

[Anonymous No.49578464]

>>49578307
>Retards like you
I actually used to work for JPMs investment research department before leaving to work for Sega so I doubt that I am retarded.
>>49578328
>What the fuck does this even mean?
All chains are the same level of security, you say "That's being done all over the place" but the truth is this is false, cosmos, polkadot are hub and spoke, this isn't really sharding at all. In chainweb each chain is as secure as the next one, something you have nowhere, absoltetly nowhere.
> that need to basically interact with all shards
Yes because uniswap can't be on multiple shards? My dear brainlet anon leave the reseach to the big boys, like me

[Anonymous No.49578646]

[Anonymous No.49578756]

>>49577404
Dumb phoneposter.

[Anonymous No.49578854]

>>49578756
When I download files they retain the filenames, It's a trick I learned in my time at Sony.

[Anonymous No.49578958]

>>49578464
> I actually used to work for JPMs investment research department before leaving to work for Sega so I doubt that I am retarded.

Oh I see. A fellow neet.

[Anonymous No.49579202]

I just sold 25% of my XCM tokens to buy KDA and LINK

[Anonymous No.49579416]

>>49577170
>no mention of trannies

[Anonymous No.49579488]

>>49578464
and proof of work chains arent even worth mining under 28kbtc/3k eth

[Anonymous No.49579566]

>>49579488
Amount of miners reduce, difficulty adjusts. Life continues. Bitcoin didn't die any of the other bear markets just because prices were bad.

[Anonymous No.49579704]

>>49579202
>because uniswap can't be on multiple
Linkies are indeed stinky.

[Anonymous No.49579928]

n-not lunching

[Anonymous No.49580527]

>>49577404
computation on icp is done with node machines, not some pos ponzi system, dumb fuck

[Anonymous No.49580608]

>>49580527
Do the nodes work for free?

[Anonymous No.49580651]

>ai confirmed sentient
>>>/g/87336646
s-so meaningless
https://cajundiscordian.medium.com/is-lamda-sentient-an-interview-ea64d916d917

[Anonymous No.49580732]

>>49580527
How is security retained across all node machines?

[Anonymous No.49580792]

>>49580651
AIs creep me out. What we're AIs?

[Anonymous No.49580821]

if*

[Anonymous No.49580834]

>>49577170
You're going to catch a lot of retards with this one, luckily none of them ever bought kadena because of the tranny meme anyway

[Anonymous No.49581193]

>>49577170
So as you know, mr. PhD., when making a claim you have to back it up with evidence, and you haven’t provided any at all. Why don’t you tell us what you found when you saw through their lies? What made you realize that it was a lie?

[Anonymous No.49581239]

>>49581193
Are you seriously questioning me right now? What a loser

[Anonymous No.49581297]

>>49577170
>I work at Nintendo
ahh so every other larper is your nephew. Got it

[Anonymous No.49581306]

>>49581193
>when making a claim you have to back it up with evidence
4chins - srs business

[Anonymous No.49581350]

>>49577170
>I work at Nintendo
Dad?

[Anonymous No.49581368]

>>49581350
I'm sorry I left you son

[Anonymous No.49581505]

>>49577170
>they claimed they figured out a way to scale horizontally by increasing the amount of chains, this sounds like anyone could do it but the way Kadena was special was the fact that each chain was as secure as every other one, basically keeping security consistent across unlimited numbers of chains
literally XRP sidechains, but those work

[Anonymous No.49581510]

buy signal

[Anonymous No.49581544]

>>49581505
Sidechains implies a main chain. Kadena does not have a main chain, this intern means that KDA has no bottleneck on one low bandwidth chain.

[Anonymous No.49581595]

>>49581544
>this intern means that KDA has no bottleneck on one low bandwidth chain
this is not a problem for the xrpl

[Anonymous No.49581617]

>>49581595
when making a claim you have to back it up with evidence, and you haven’t provided any at all.

[Anonymous No.49581635]

>>49581505
Stay in your thread.

[Anonymous No.49581713]

>>49581505
Kadena does not have sidechains. XRP has sidechains because the entire thing is proof of approval. A centralized system mimicking the existing SWIFT. What happens when a node does something the leaders dont like? They just kick them out lol, and wanna be a new node? Good luck, nobody with power will give it to you and there is no mechanism in place like PoW where approval isn't needed to be part of the system.
XRP is the single most centralized scam in the market and it has no future.

[Anonymous No.49581766]

>>49581617
it doesn't use the same validator system that you may be assuming

>>49581713
keep sipping the coolaid

anyway i thought i'd drop by because you think that horizontal scaling is novel to KDA--it's not

[Anonymous No.49581798]

>>49581766
It's novel to cryptocurrencies, centralized databases have used this method for decades

[Anonymous No.49581953]

>>49581766
Sipping what coolaid? Everything I wrote was negativity about XRP, nothing to shill Kadena. You just don't have ANY argument against the fact that XRP is entirely centralized and is not interesting in the slightest.

[Anonymous No.49582194]

KDA is just 2021 NEO

[Anonymous No.49582244]

>>49581766
xrp schizos need a bullet to the head, to end their suffering

how does it feel to baghold since 2017 and STILL being 75% below ATH? at least linkies and kaddies have done a 10x at the very minimum, and it has taken nearly a world war and massive recession to get those returns back down

[Anonymous No.49582288]

>>49577170
I read that text at the bottom of the pic and I suddenly realised not one image materialised in my mind, like I couldn't pin point a single fucking reference to anything that proports to be; it's not physical, tactile, it's not fuckiing rela
and then the sounds of kvetching were growing louder

[Anonymous No.49582301]

Is it over for Ethereum?

[Anonymous No.49582375]

>>49582288
Not to be rude but that bottom text explains Chainweb pretty well. Should I translate for brainlets or do you not care?
>>49582194
To be rude, you are a dumb dumb, you say that because of your lack of understanding about the tech and now all you're good for is for drawing comparisons between coins that did a certain thing way back, useless existence

[Anonymous No.49582430]

>>49582375
>Should I translate for brainlets or do you not care?
don't bother, I like not losing money

[Anonymous No.49582444]

>>49582430
>don't bother
For some reason, I could tell that you didn't care, useless existence

[Anonymous No.49583565]

>>49582444
ok what about this, I take out a 2nd mortgage and I put all that, including all my savings, onto the blockchain
would that make you my fren? would that get your dick hard? In fact, so game for this I am that I will even submit my McWagie app this very second so I can be good and ready, and we can work together!