/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.49500777]

Robot-controlled IoT networks will be huge in the future. Robonomics has a fully functional project, it can already operate and be operated by robot devices through its parachain. It will also shortly be opening XCM channels to Karura, Kilt, Moonriver, and Crust, vastly increasing its capabilities and access to its services. Marketcap is still under $6 million

[Anonymous No.49500796]

Coinmetro thread?

[Anonymous No.49500807]

>>49500796
i-it means cross-chain messaging in this context

[Anonymous No.49500820]

Coinmetro thread

[Anonymous No.49501341]

>>49500807
Coinmetro thread!

[Anonymous No.49501487]

>>49500820
https://youtu.be/NQQVAugAlME?t=68
lmao

[Anonymous No.49501683]

>>49501487
All jokes aside has there ever been an Israeli project that wasn't a scam?

[Anonymous No.49501695]

>>49501683
Intel is built their chip fab there, I don't think that's a scam, right?

[Anonymous No.49501719]

>>49501695
I meant crytpo projects. But domestic chip production is a matter of national security to the point all countries need one. Which is probably why Dual Americans are making sure their greatest ally has one while exporting their own production to China.

[Anonymous No.49501730]

>>49501719
>I meant crytpo projects.
Starknet/starkware

[Anonymous No.49501759]

>>49501730
>Starknet
A non EVM compatable ETH L2? What is the point of this. I think STARKs on ETH sounds like a good idea but it also sounds kind of like the typical buzzword salad that VCs shit out.

[Anonymous No.49501778]

>>49501759
Well anon, EVM on zk rollups are too expensive for arbitrary smart contract execution. They are affordable when the circuits are very simple, as in the case of swaps and simple payments transactions, but they are impossibly expensive and unworkable for non-trivial smart contract execution.

[Anonymous No.49501791]

>>49501778
You don't really like this project and are trying to shill me some other problem looking for a solution. That is why I didn't spend more than 30 seconds reading about it before asking you to spoon feed me.

[Anonymous No.49501808]

>>49501791
It's not a scam though at least?

[Anonymous No.49501831]

>>49501808
It doesn't seem to be but it is hard to tell with how early in development it seems to be. I would have more faith in it if it wasn't based in Israel.

[Anonymous No.49501837]

t-through the Robonomics parachain you can control and receive data from Spot the robot dog

[Anonymous No.49501846]

>>49501837
What does this have to do with XCM - The Coinmetro Exchange Token?

[Anonymous No.49501849]

>>49501837
Shut up faggot this is a Coinmetro thread.

[Anonymous No.49501884]

Reimo is so cute. He deserves more than 25 views but he should stop broadcasting at 360p
https://youtu.be/WHlj8yQNzJA?t=1113

[Anonymous No.49501942]

>>49501487
I finished watching this. I can't believe the free money machine is going to cause people to lose money due to incompetence. It kind of gives me hope that some of the other bad actors in the space will eventually get fucked

[Anonymous No.49502012]

>>49501884
My timestamp rugged. Watch from 23:47

[Anonymous No.49502023]

>>49501942
>the free money machine
Is that how you refer to crypto

[Anonymous No.49502053]

>>49502023
I meant the unbacked fractional reserve lending platform.

[Anonymous No.49502474]

>>49500777
Bumping because kusama is very based desu

Kilt DID could have some demand from pajeet government using did's, that's a lot of people over there so demand could go very high

Good luck based Dotsama anons

[Anonymous No.49503662]

>AMA rugged
It's over.

[Anonymous No.49505278]

>>49503662
this is what a rug looks like

[Anonymous No.49506352]

>>49505278
my parsiq stay fartshit

[Anonymous No.49507264]

>>49503662
>kevin simply fell asleep
wow I am shocked!

[Anonymous No.49507300]

>>49507264
Coinmetro literally just sent me an "It's over" email.

[Anonymous No.49507420]

>>49507300
> Because we are in a full bear market
> We’ve been in bear market throughout the month of May and as the dust settles after the initial plummet, it leaves room for discussion and planning ahead. Right now the markets are going down due to several reasons

[Anonymous No.49507556]

>>49507420
It is peak comfy watching everything else on /biz/ crash and being in a 60c stablecoin. At this rate the prophecy might come true.

[Anonymous No.49507601]

>>49507556
pic related was my favorite moment today, maybe you missed it

[Anonymous No.49507684]

>>49507601
Those were my posts.

[Anonymous No.49507736]

>>49507684
wtf no way haha

[Anonymous No.49507765]

>>49507736
I wish I could prove it somehow :(
Maybe I should start tripfagging?

[Anonymous No.49507853]

>>49507765
It's fine I trust you :3

[Anonymous No.49508524]

>>49507264
>raises price floor
>team wallet gets sent to exchange
>"yeah bro, it was useless there we just moved it to cold storage for safety, don't worry about it bro"
>CEO avoids coming on AMA at all costs
Napping is based but rugging isn't.

[Anonymous No.49508560]

>>49508524
>Napping is based
dumb boomer

[Anonymous No.49508574]

>>49508524
Tummy.

[Anonymous No.49508836]

>>49500777
coinmetro annoucing ADA at this point is a huge top signal. the marketing is still kindegarten tier and the price floor means the insiders control 99% of the xcm out there

[Anonymous No.49508942]

>>49508836
Are you lonely?

[Anonymous No.49508962]

alright I'm going to use my spite to write my master thesis
>>49508836
>marketing is still kindegarten
Explain what you mean

[Anonymous No.49509238]

>DA layers always need to plan for the scenario where the block was made available initially, but then nodes need to communicate with each other to piece it back together. This reconstruction requires two assumptions:

>You have enough nodes (light or full) sampling the data such that collectively they have enough to piece it back together. This is a fairly weak and unavoidable honest minority assumption, so not a huge concern.
>Reintroduces the synchrony assumption – the nodes need to be able to communicate within some period of time to put it back together.

No word of pic related

>Recall Vitalik’s “Endgame” – all roads lead to centralized block production with and decentralized validation.

[Anonymous No.49509281]

>>49505278
now post kadena
why did kevin lie
why does he keep on lying about it

[Anonymous No.49509303]

>>49509281
shut up

[Anonymous No.49509326]

>>49509303
why should i?

[Anonymous No.49509426]

>>49509238
This is fucking crazy
>The security assumptions for reconstruction of an available block here are:

>Enough nodes to perform sample requests such that they collectively have enough data to reconstruct the block
>Synchrony assumption between nodes who are broadcasting their individual pieces of the block

>So, how many nodes is enough? Rough estimates ballpark it ~64,000 individual instances

[Anonymous No.49509453]

>>49509426
>This tight coupling of the Beacon block and shards essentially pretends not to be sharded.
>In fact, let’s define why it’s even considered “sharded” at all. The only remnant of “sharding” is simply the fact that validators aren’t responsible for downloading all of the data. That’s it.
>So you’re not crazy if you were questioning by now whether this is really still sharding. This distinction is why PDS (we’ll cover this shortly) is not considered “sharded” (even though it has “sharding” in the name, yes I know it’s confusing). PDS requires each validator to fully download all shard blobs in order to attest to their availability. DS then introduces sampling, so individual validators only download pieces of it.
retards

[Anonymous No.49509509]

>>49509453
>Notice the builder isn’t the bottleneck. You’ll need to quickly generate KZG proofs for 32 MB of data, so expect a GPU or pretty beefy CPU plus at least 2.5 GBit/s bandwidth. This is a specialized role anyway for whom this is a negligible cost of doing business.
lmao

[Anonymous No.49509598]

>>49501884
>no views
>only 3 people in the audience
It's a double rug.

[Anonymous No.49509656]

>>49509598
We are soo early bro.
>>49509509
Is there any POS network that can actually be run outside of data centres?

[Anonymous No.49509672]

>>49509656

>History is needed for a full sync of the chain, but it isn’t needed for validating new blocks (this just requires state). So once a client has synced to the tip of the chain, historical data is only retrieved when requested explicitly over the JSON-RPC or when a peer attempts to sync the chain. With EIP-4444 implemented, we’d need to find alternative solutions for these.

>Clients will be unable to “full sync” using devp2p as they do today – they will instead “checkpoint sync” from a weak subjectivity checkpoint that they’ll treat as the genesis block.

>Note that weak subjectivity won’t be an added assumption – it’s inherent in the shift to PoS anyway. This necessitates that valid weak subjectivity checkpoints be used to sync due to the possibility of long-range attacks. The assumption here is that clients will not sync from an invalid or old weak subjectivity checkpoint. This checkpoint must be within the period that we start pruning historical data (i.e., within one year here) otherwise the p2p layer would be unable to provide the required data.

[Anonymous No.49509710]

>It sounds nice that EIP-4444 prunes historical data after a year, and PDS prunes blobs even more quickly (after about a month). We definitely need these because we can’t require nodes to store all this and remain decentralized:

>EIP-4488 – long-run likely to include ~1 MB per slot adds ~2.5 TB storage per year
>PDS – at target ~1 MB per slot adds ~2.5 TB storage per year
>DS – at target ~16 MB per slot adds ~40 TB storage per year

>But where does this data go? Don’t we still need it? Yes, but note that losing historical data is not a risk to the protocol – only to individual applications. It shouldn’t then be the job of the Ethereum core protocol to permanently maintain all of this data that it comes to consensus on.

[Anonymous No.49509743]

>It’s acceptable that builders still require the state due to PBS – they’ll be more centralized high-resource entities anyway. Focus on decentralizing validators. Weak statelessness gives the builders a bit more work, and validators far less work. Great tradeoff.

>Great tradeoff

[Anonymous No.49509874]

>Weak statelessness also allows Ethereum to loosen self-imposed constraints on its execution throughput with state bloat no longer a pressing concern. Bumping up gas limits ~3x could be reasonable.
"Weak statelessness" (deleting state lmao)
>Most user execution will be taking place on L2s at this point anyway, but higher L1 throughput is still beneficial even to them. Rollups rely on Ethereum for DA (posted to shards) and settlement (which requires L1 execution). As Ethereum scales its DA layer, the amortized cost of posting proofs could become a larger share of rollup costs (especially for ZK-rollups).

>As long as someone still has the full history (block explorers, etc.), you can get what you need from them.

>L2 state will grow at orders of magnitude higher rates, to the point where it will even be a drag on high-performance builders.

[Anonymous No.49510082]

with the launch of Cherry Network soon, it'll see a difference considering Cherry promises fast & secure transactions with its eco-friendly proof-of-stake approach

[Anonymous No.49510103]

>>49509656
>The Beacon Chain validator list and upcoming leader selection list are public, and it’s rather easy to deanonymize them and map their IP addresses. You can probably see the issue here.

>More sophisticated validators can use tricks to better hide themselves, but small-time validators will be particularly susceptible to getting doxxed and subsequently DDOSd. This can be quite easily exploited for MEV.

What the fuck

>SSLE makes it such that nobody but the proposer knows when their turn is up preventing this attack. This won’t be live at the merge, but hopefully it can be implemented not too long afterwards.

[Anonymous No.49510160]

WTF I love PoW

[Anonymous No.49510266]

>>49510160
stop coping your shitcoin is dead
emily lied
kdx scammed
kevin dumped

[Anonymous No.49510287]

>>49510266
>The reason why we need sharding to scale is because it is the only way to scale without raising the bar for running a full node, while maintaining the full security guarantees of blockchains as closely as possible. https://dankradfeist.de/ethereum/2021/05/20/what-everyone-gets-wrong-about-51percent-attacks.html

[Anonymous No.49510323]

>>49510287
-94%
sell and stop coping
you will never be rich if you keep on falling for tranny shills

[Anonymous No.49510339]

>>49510323
Are you lonely?

[Anonymous No.49510363]

>>49510339
i am

[Anonymous No.49510473]

>>49510323
I am buying as much as I can. 2k kda atm

[Anonymous No.49510514]

>>49510473
lmao
why are you even buying this garbage

[Anonymous No.49510519]

>>49510363
You're that mentally ill frogposter that hates all of us but still keeps posting here while sometimes pretending to be friendly with other posters, aren't you?

[Anonymous No.49510548]

>>49510519
no i never post frogs
im the guy who forgot to sell

[Anonymous No.49510570]

>>49510514
it is the next bitcoin

[Anonymous No.49510619]

>>49510570
its the next bitbean

[Anonymous No.49510700]

did you know that robonomics can run smart homes, factories, and cities? sergey (different one) will talk about it at polkadot decoded this month

[Anonymous No.49510790]

>>49510519
You miss the frogposter and you're concerned for his mental well being, that's sweet and wholesome.

[Anonymous No.49511100]

>>49510790
>>49510519
i legit don't get it why you girls did this to me
gave me hope, then shattered it all

[Anonymous No.49511518]

>>49511100

[Anonymous No.49511713]

>>49511518
i don't post frogs
i blame emily, if she didn't come to this shithole i would sell, but it inspired fake confidence and i held
god this is so bad

[Anonymous No.49511972]

>>49511713
This is a Coinmetro thread, not a Kadena thread.

[Anonymous No.49512060]

Coinmetro thread!!

[Anonymous No.49512168]

>>49511972
same shit

[Anonymous No.49512196]