[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 597 KB, 1200x627, 926252836252.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49499447 No.49499447 [Reply] [Original]

>gives you access to the v0.1 staking pool

How will nopoolers cope? Imagine not starting to compound link rewards early. Imagine having to wait another two years.

>> No.49499622

>>49499447
You'll just be able to stake by clicking a button on Binance and getting almost the same APY.

>> No.49499675

>>49499447
Serg literally said that oldfags get priority staking with no reference to linkpool. You faggots have been saying “pools closed” for years and Sergey just comes out and says that my 2017 linkies will be at the front of the line anyway.

>> No.49499676

>>49499447
Imagine the imagine

>> No.49499685

>>49499447
they had four years

>> No.49499728
File: 229 KB, 828x1623, FU2KxTYX0AgWTxk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49499728

is this post accurate?

>> No.49499782
File: 264 KB, 1080x1085, cope.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49499782

>>49499622
ok genius, explain how an unlimited pool can offer the same apy than a limited one (but anyway there's no evidence binance will even have a spot in the pool)

>>49499675
filename

Also imagine being an early linkie as well as a lpl holder, you could stake two times in the v0.1

>> No.49499801

>>49499782
why would i need to stake two times, lmao

>> No.49499816

>>49499447
>All node have a specific allocated amount they can stake
>Linkpools can only stake .0001 Link per LPL
lmao, great buy retards

>> No.49499849

>>49499801
>why would staking more linkies be a good thing?

Gee, nopoolers really are retarded

>> No.49499858

>>49499447
lpl blows

>> No.49499927

>>49499849
are you pretending to have any idea how much link you will be able to stake through either mechanism?

>> No.49500052

>>49499927
More is more, did you fail maths or something? Also it's not so much about how many at first, it's about having a spot which will compound and grow throughout the later versions. Better to have two spots than one

>> No.49500116

Why doesn't Segey recommend we buy LPL? He never talks about it, yet pollens bang on and on about how we need this crucial third party coin or we're funked. If it turns out that the poolers were right it'd reflect really badly on chainlink for not telling us beforehand. I really doubt they'd risk looking that shit for what amounts to no good reason, and this is the primary reason I never bought any LPL and instead bought all Link. I think it's a good reason and I'm yet to hear it refuted.

>> No.49500154

If I weren't an LPLer I'd be fucking seething at your threads OP. Feels good to own part of the pool kek. Hats off to all who were smart enough to buy/hold

>> No.49500330

>>49500116
The cope is reaching ridiculous levels. You made this whole story up in your head just to not kys for not buying lpl?

>Why doesn't Segey recommend we buy LPL?

Lol, he's not even allowed to tell us to buy link he's extremely cautious around this as he doesn't want to fuck up like xrp did.

But he can still give some hints, learn to read between the lines, he tried very hard to let us know, just two examples:

>Jonny has literally been hired by Chainlink
>Sergey announces a 3rd party delegation system

Now come on, you cannot be this stupid

>> No.49500361
File: 1.67 MB, 2048x1536, 6FECDA9A-D796-40D9-BE3B-56CA340D35E8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49500361

>>49500330
Jonny rims horses
Token not needed
Many such cases

>> No.49500367

>>49500330
he's so cautious about people buying LPL that he came out and said that oldfags didn't have to buy LPL to get priority staking. Talk about under the radar.

>> No.49500447

>>49499782
Yeah i was thinking the same thing. I held over 12k for over 3 years now and hold over 8k LPL. I'm sitting very comfy. Looking forward to the rollout

>> No.49500485

>>49500367
You don't even know what LPL does. It's not only a ticket for staking your linkies, you get a cut from every single person staking on linkpool delegation infrastructure. That's the 3rd party system Sergey has mentioned. Even if other nodes who have a large contingent want to stake, they're very likely to use linkpool.

>> No.49500543

>>49499447
That 3% apy is going to be so sweet. I could get 20% or more for other coins elsewhere but the 3% is clearly better financially speaking

>> No.49500565

>>49499447
Fudders and no poolers aren't happy. Im glad i bought mine years ago.

>> No.49500604

>>49499447
>How will nopoolers cope?
They won't

>> No.49500616

>>49500565
If I offered you a token that would get you access to more LPL tokens, would you buy that, too? Oh no, you'd just buy LPL, wouldn't you? Good thinking, now apply same reasoning to buying LPL in the first place

>> No.49500641

>>49500616
LPL prints LINK. It let's me stake link. It also gives me benefits of owning part of linkpool. I will be making income on all of linkpools services as it grows as well as chainlink from chainlink staking. It was obvious from day 1.

>> No.49500645

>>49500616
>Why buy a money printer when you can just buy money

>> No.49500672

LPL chads are gonna make it

>> No.49500855

>>49500565
They're unironically foaming at the mouth. it's pretty funny to see after all the fud we've been through. I can still remember the US citizen not allowed, linkpool is a security, matt's gonna run with your money etc

>> No.49500955

>>49500855
>matt's gonna run with your money etc
ummmm.....

>> No.49501087
File: 45 KB, 620x831, 1612897981624.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49501087

>>49499447
I'm already staking on bancor for 10% APR

>> No.49501106

>>49500955
;)

>>49501087
This is not staking.

>> No.49502320

>>49499447
>How will nopoolers cope?
by owning more link and not spending money on a 3rd party coin with a dubious use case and necessity

>> No.49502775

lol at all these nopoolers. get fucked
>>49502320
>reee i can own more link instead of a link printing machine
low time preference nigger tier brain power, contrats on that seriously

>> No.49502829

>>49501087
>staking
What you are doing is loaning your Link out. There is risks involved in that, I hope you know.

>> No.49502860

>>49502829
such as?

>> No.49502948

Jesus you faggots are obnoxious, to all newfags dont buy LPL its simply not worth it at the moment.
>>49502775
Its grossly overvalued, and no world is LPL supposed to valued at 400M

>> No.49502965

>>49502948
circ supply is less than 30m lpl, 400m would assume team tokens are on the market and they have explicitly said they are not for sale

>> No.49503059

>>49501106
>This is not staking.
Lmao who cares faggot? Also if you don’t think they’re going to offer staking services you’re a legit retard.

>> No.49503078

>>49502775
Which would you rather have 1 million dollars or a machine that prints 1k for you every week?

>> No.49503222

>>49503078
i have a million dollars its fucking jack shit. 1k a week sounds like heaven

>> No.49503292

>>49503222
Well that’s around 5% apy so shouldn’t be too hard to achieve in crypto with stable coins, what’s your problem?

>> No.49503317

>>49503222
Passive income midwit detected. it well take you 20 years to break even with the up front million, with zero reinvestment. if we factor reinvestment into the equitation you well NEVER catch up to the flat million even if you reinvest 100% of that 1k a week. hell you could throw that million into the S&P 500 and get 7% apy which breaks out to $1300 a weak

>> No.49503427

>>49502775
Link is a link printing machine. No other token needed

>> No.49503506
File: 1.18 MB, 896x1371, 1593453885654.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49503506

>>49503317
Are you actually retarded are just larping?