[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 44 KB, 500x737, 1608179592675.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49404631 No.49404631 [Reply] [Original]

you know it's gonna lead the next bull cycle, right?

>> No.49404640

Probably won't pump this much again. The private vesting unlocks are fucking brutal. VCs dump their shit like madmen.

>> No.49404813

>>49404640
Unlocks are literally x10 more subtle this time

AVAX pumped from $2.5 to $145 with very aggressive unlocking schedule (Multiple 50M+ AVAX unlocks each 3 months), Now there's like 5M AVAX unlocks every quarter and those are foundation and team tokens.

The only thing that matters is relative valuation, And AVAX is undervalued by x10.

>> No.49404851

>>49404813
I agree that it's undervalued, but will it get the deserved spark? It's a clown market and you get left in dust and behind pretty fucking fast.

>> No.49405316

>>49404631
Not trying to shill anything but why would I buy AVAX over ROSE? Subnets and Paratimes seem very similar but Oasis lowers fees and increases real tps by separating consensus layer and ALSO has differential privacy allowing for novel blockchain use cases. I have been looking at both of these and am leaning towards ROSE but curious what the argument for AVAX against it would be.

>> No.49405398

>>49405316
I'm balls deep in both AVAX and ROSE, fren.
You can hodl both, both are undervalued af.

>> No.49405485

>>49404631
Fuck this crab dumping piece of trash coin. Going down faster than you can say double spend.

>> No.49405503

sir.... benchot.... my bastard man....
i think you misunderstanded me
when i sayed i want my baggies cheap, i meaned.... -cheap-

>> No.49405508

>>49405398
I guess that’s true but market cap wise AVAX seems like less of a big multiple to be had. Maybe a good hedge since it already has some adoption.

>> No.49405571

>>49405316
Avax actually has a new consensus while rose is just some cosmos shit

>> No.49406478

>>49404813
You obviously don't know about the vested OTC deals then.

>> No.49408575

>>49405316
I'm in both but AVAX C-chain has much more activity than Emerald, subnet is getting more traction than paratime too, who else is building a new paratime except the Oasis Foundation?
As >>49405571 said ROSE using Tendermint is outdated tech and they're not connecting to the rest of Cosmos ecosystem yet

>>49406478
and you know about it?

>> No.49409908

>>49404640
>>49404851
strange how people are not expecting this to pump but total shitcoins like Sol to pump again? Avax is going to go mental next bull because of subnets.

>> No.49409976

Should i scoop this up now? Or wait single digits lol

>> No.49410031

>>49409976
Does it matter?
AVAX is going to 5 digits sooner or later.

>> No.49410041

>>49409976
I'm betting on single digits. Once that bitch hits 9.99$, I'll be buying heavy as fuck. At least 50% of each paycheck will go towards AVAX.

>> No.49410213

>>49409976
Long term accumulation should start now, don't wait for triple digits.

Anything below $30 is great for accumulation. Personally I'm waiting for a better entry since I had to take some profits.

>> No.49410726
File: 412 KB, 1647x1233, D5FC8A98-DC96-4F6A-9121-E0FAA34CA7CF.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49410726

just stopping by to say hello to the AVAX chads

>> No.49411684

>>49404631
We can open a long position in Avax now

>> No.49411701

my crypto guy said 20 is the bottom, following the liquidity, and we aren't waiting till aug to pump. won't be a face melting pump, but we should be back at 50-60 mid next month. I didn't listen to him the first time and bought back in at 77. Please guys. This dude is killing it right now. I don't even think we'll see 22 again this year.

>> No.49411736

>>49411701
Not sure if I can trust this

>> No.49411847

>>49405571
>>49408575
ROSE actually completely rebuilt tendermint. It's their own SDK entirely. They used it as a base, but it's far from the same... sooo idk, hard to take advice from dudes who don't know wtf they're talking about if I'm being real.

>> No.49412186

>>49405316
>by separating consensus layer
Avalanche did it first. the crusty old Chink just copied Ted Yins homework.

> and ALSO has differential privacy allowing for novel blockchain use cases.
or you could just run an avalanche subnet with privacy features.
already in the works FYI

>> No.49414396

>>49411701
>ples sirs buyu my bags villaj hungree i giv u avax rupees

>> No.49414452
File: 24 KB, 320x261, Aleph-Zero.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49414452

>>49404631
>No
No

>> No.49414497

10 is bottom

>> No.49414982
File: 146 KB, 1280x1280, 1621711670934.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49414982

>>49411701
the bottom is 3.5 dollars

>> No.49415620

where's everybody staking right now?

>> No.49415624

>>49404631
fr fr

>> No.49416199

>>49415620
wallet

>> No.49416217
File: 123 KB, 800x800, 1646491463846.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49416217

>>49410726
Hellloooo~

>> No.49416426

>>49416199
why not liquid stake it?

>> No.49416577
File: 112 KB, 1024x1024, 1632670603999.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49416577

>>49415624
no cap

>> No.49416641
File: 2 KB, 136x249, 1646015652397.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49416641

>>49416577
ayyyyyyyy dat boy straight up dropping the drip, zippity dippppp!!!!