[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 111 KB, 965x850, 1654512579688.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49402972 No.49402972 [Reply] [Original]

Chainlink has a finite supply
Chainlink tokens cannot be minted
Chainlink staking is non inflationary
Chainlink networks are profitable
Chainlink tokens will be staked in node
Chainlink yield will be self sustainable
Chainlink circulating supply will be reduced
Chainlink CCIP will create even more network profits and tokens demand
Chainlink tokens demand will rise
It's just mathematical

>> No.49403027
File: 13 KB, 241x157, LINK.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49403027

>>49402972
3.04% at Vauld now.
Use referral cryptocat to get kickbacks.

>> No.49403051
File: 7 KB, 255x197, 1515421951409.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49403051

>>49402972
>zey believed staking is coming out?
>daamp it

>> No.49403054

>>49402972
Chainlink staking can be inflationary if sergay subsidised with reserve

>> No.49403597

>>49402972
Stop noticing things, bigot.

>> No.49403612
File: 423 KB, 1100x642, CITI_report.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49403612

chainlink not needed

>> No.49403640

Chainlink doesn't fucking matter buy matic instead
Chainlink doesn't fucking matter buy matic for real
Chainlink doesn't fucking matter buy matic actually
Chainlink doesn't fucking matter buy matic for real
Chainlink doesn't fucking matter buy matic please

>> No.49403747

>>49402972
530 million (over half of total supply) still in the hands of chainlink labs
Any other crypto currency would be laughed out of state if this was true for them

>> No.49403848
File: 61 KB, 1826x1006, Token-Sale-Terms-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49403848

>>49403747
yeah bro I was laughing all the way back in 2017 haha

>> No.49403867

>>49403848
Exactly this. We made profit but centralization aspect is laughable

>> No.49403885

guys be real with me is 1000 stinky linkies enough to not suck start my mossberg 500

>> No.49403899

>>49403867
>We made profit
So you bought back when 65% of the supply was in the hands of CL? Interesting.

>> No.49403913

>>49403054
Are you retarded?

>> No.49403932
File: 60 KB, 720x630, '.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49403932

>>49403885
If you can't afford a paltry 10000 LINK stack you aren't even white.

>> No.49403975
File: 9 KB, 250x250, 1654200935939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49403975

>>49402972
I bought 1000 Chainlink tokens (ticker: LINK) last night
Am I gonna make it?

>> No.49404025

>>49402972
Do you think ~150 is enough to quit waging? I can’t do it much longer bro…

>> No.49404043

>>49403932
Kike hands posted this

>> No.49404106

>>49403747
Seems like fair split when compared to current vc scams, this is why they hate chainlink so much
No 30% at reduced prices for vc parasites

>> No.49404313

>>49403899
Yes, I thought risk adjusted returns would be incredible considering the absolute essential nature of the product.
I've since took profits but still hold a sui (10k)
It's just hilarious this fact is conveniently ignored or dismissed as fud when brought up

>> No.49404337

>>49404106
>there are vc pnd's so it's OK if link token supply is centralized as well
As we've seen with PA, link is held in different standard than these scam coins

>> No.49406171

>>49403612
Sarcasm? Satire? Irony?