ChainLink (LINK) crashing and burning

[Anonymous No.4646507]

>1482 sats

now LITERALLY below presale price. it's over retards

[Anonymous No.4646562]

reqt

[Anonymous No.4646571]

I lost half a bitcoin on this shit XD
I aint mad though. You lose some win some.

Overall I up.

[Anonymous No.4646625]

im so numb to the pain. I sold 80 k ARK for 350 k Link. I dont think anyone here can top my JUST for this coin.

Its all up to kami sama now. I will either be a millionaire or be poor in 2 years. The same way if you were born in a 3rd world country vs to wealthy wall street bankers. You cant control the fate of money.

Born a linkie. Die a linkie.

[CeCsBNu79wzWDxZ3wNRqt518iHW4fJ(...) No.4646673]

>>4646625
#4CHNallday

[Anonymous No.4646708]

>he measures price in sats
>laughing_girls.jpg

[Anonymous No.4646725]

>>4646708
this lmao fiat is only thing that matters unless you're some bitcoin maximalist retard

[Anonymous No.4646738]

So, your whole argument is that it didn't outperform Bitcoin? lmao, what altcoins even did?

[Anonymous No.4646741]

well btc has more then doubled since the ico, so they're well down on pre ico. LOL

[Anonymous No.4646747]

>>4646507
when i see posts like this, i know its time to buy

[Anonymous No.4646761]

>>4646725
If an altcoin can't keep up with BTC, there's no reason to hold it. That's why people use it

[Anonymous No.4646766]

Time to double down anon.

How do you think Bruce Jenner felt when they told her he couldn't microwave his penis?

Exactly. Sell a little bit of everything else to more LINK

[Anonymous No.4646778]

>>4646507
Inb4 retards say this is the perfect chance to get more

[Anonymous No.4646813]

>>4646761
OP's post implies there was lost money. Lost opportunity maybe, but nothing was lost.
It's confusing to measure in sats, just look at Ripple's chart, you'd think you were hemorrhaging money.

Maybe I should be holding BTC, but frankly I don't want to hold something that has no fundamentals backing it. I don't want to wake up to 30% losses because the market finally realized it was being retarded.

[Anonymous No.4646818]

[Anonymous No.4646827]

>>4646761
>if a coin can't keep up with another coin there is no reason to hold it
- is literally the same thing, you bitcoin maximalist. Hindsight 20/20 motherfucker. If you treat bitcoin value differently than other coins' value you're literally retarded.

[Anonymous No.4646835]

I have never been happier, fuck linkies for ruining this board

[Anonymous No.4646841]

>>4646625
80k ark is like a money printing machine with staking and if you actually believe in ark then $100 ark is a real possibility in the not too distant future.. why the guck did you sell that for LINK? Even just accumulating that much ark is hard.. the books are always thin as fuck because of staking

[Anonymous No.4646844]

Sergey is laughing all the way to the bank. Has done a SINGLE THING since the ICO
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

[Anonymous No.4646852]

>>4646827
Well, given that the vast majority of trading pairs on every exchange are Altcoin/BTC, yes BTC is treated differently compared to other coins by the vast majority of traders.

[Anonymous No.4646914]

>>4646852
ETH is well paired with most solid coins. Fiat to alts is coming next year. Your argument is void of any factual value or logic.

[Anonymous No.4646942]

>>4646571
based pajeet

[Anonymous No.4646951]

>>4646914
For someone who likes to use things like "factual value" and "logic", your posts are filled with a lot of emotional language and phrasing

[Anonymous No.4646981]

>>4646951
>coin x outperformed coin y, why didn't you just hold coin x you retard heuehuehue
This is your argument.

[Anonymous No.4646983]

>>4646766
its a he you fuck.

[Anonymous No.4647020]

Anyways, my point was that the vast majority of crypto volume that is traded are paired with BTC. This guy seems awfully emotionally invested in not using BTC at all. I was only pointing out why most people use BTC to measure alts.
The fact of the matter is everyone is using it, whether you like it or not, and just because you yourself don't does not make you immune to the affects of altcoins being tied to the price of BTC throughout all the major exchanges.

[Anonymous No.4647062]

You can really tell when there are people on here that have not made face to face interactions with humans in a very long time. I genuinely feel sorry for you, because when you eventually have to make your own way out there, you will be totally dysfunctional and hopeless,

[Anonymous No.4647064]

>>4647020
Literally what you say is true, and yet it doesn't even touch my argument that fiat value is all that matters.
>This guy seems awfully emotionally invested in not using BTC at all
How about instead of an ad hominem you attack my argument, brainlet?

[Anonymous No.4647118]

How does it feel linkie? how does it feel that while you are "accumulating" your shitcoin, everyone else is having mad gains and laughing all the way to the bank while you ar holding your neutron star heavy bags. And on top of that, should link start to move, everyone else can buy in at a discount greater than yours and still make a lot more bank than you all because you stuck to the HODL meme on a shitcoin? how does it feel linkie?

[Anonymous No.4647132]

>>4647020

I always use the ETH/Altcoin trading pairs if I can. I hate using BTC. I hate buying BTC. I hate holding BTC. It's a fucking shit old coin and it needs to die. It's an overinflated scam coin backed by fake tethers and it's own team doesn't even consider it a currency anymore, why should it even be used for trades. I am not a Bcash fag either if you are wondering.

ETH is an actually good currency that doesn't fuck over the entire market with it's bullshit every few months. I always buy and trade with ETH. But if I could trade Alts straight for Fiat I would, I would cut out the ETH middleman.

[Anonymous No.4647155]

I love link and link loves me.
Say with me
>I LOVE LINK AND LINK LOVES ME

[Anonymous No.4647169]

>>4646708
coping -the post

[Anonymous No.4647178]

>>4647132
This guy gets it.

[Anonymous No.4647198]

Are you linkfags finally seeing how deluded you where?

[Anonymous No.4647206]

>>4646562
I don't know if you can still use that word. USD/REQ is 1.08x, 8% over ICO price. I'm not REQT anymore. I'm 8% now.
Btw. investing 1k in Chainlink at this low now. REQ and LINK could partner up and increase each others value perfectly. They both are synergize extremely well with each other.

[Anonymous No.4647230]

>to buy back your sins deluded Linkies jump to this 5x Rocket

[Anonymous No.4647265]

>>4647132
except when butalik viterin crashes his lambo in the hotel bathroom with the boot full of toddlers

[Anonymous No.4647332]

LET'S DO IT /BIZ/

WE

[Anonymous No.4647343]

ARE

[Anonymous No.4647353]

LINKIES

[Anonymous No.4647357]

>>4647206

can I have the link to the USD/REQ pairing pls? id like to buy some

[Anonymous No.4647387]

this fud has some truth too it, but the board is full of it today, most of the time that means somthing is going to happen in the opposite direction

i'm not selling

[Anonymous No.4647388]

>>4647332
>>4647343
>>4647353
And we are not selling

[Anonymous No.4647414]

Glad I got out of this shit but still lost like 1,5 BTC to it, it gives me head ache and I hope Link will bleed out heavy - I will come back at this bitch and get my promised money back when it hit's the time!!! but so long, bleed and lose reputation!

[Anonymous No.4647494]

>>4647387
>this fud has some truth too it, but the board is full of it today, most of the time that means somthing is going to happen in the opposite direction

This to be honest. My first thought upon getting home from work today was "holy shit this thing must be getting listed on Bittrex tomorrow morning if whales are manipulating it down this fucking much, someone really wants to buy as much as possible fast". And then I come here and see all the psychological warfare FUD against Chainlink and know that now is the time to buy. Something big is coming.

[Anonymous No.4647540]

>>4647494
Buy the fud, sell the shill. It's literally this easy.

[Anonymous No.4647553]

>>4647387
>>4647494
>>4647540
t. lost 20% today

Yeah, not taking advice from you fags

[Anonymous No.4647554]

Waiting for 5m mcap, then all in.

[Anonymous No.4647573]

>>4647494
>I come here and see all the psychological warfare FUD against Chainlink and know that now is the time to buy. Something big is coming.
Ive been hearing this every single day since it started plummeting from 50 cents.
LMAO!

[Anonymous No.4647586]

>>4647553
I bought at $0.14 though.

[Anonymous No.4647603]

It's just FUD, right? they want my bags, right?
well im not selling!
because i didn't waste all my savings, right? RIGHT?

[Anonymous No.4647624]

BTC value you bloody pajeet

[Anonymous No.4647638]

>>4646625
weeb btfo

[Anonymous No.4647640]

>>4646507
satoshis no longer matter you fucking retard, its hardly moved in dollar price and thats what matters

[Anonymous No.4647674]

>>4647640
>its hardly moved in dollar price and thats what matters
t. newfag

[Anonymous No.4647679]

>>4646708
I'm too much of a brainlet to measure in sats. Better just measure it int USD

[Anonymous No.4647682]

>>4646571
now or when you bought it? btc keeps going up

[Anonymous No.4647689]

Every coin will rebound by tomorrow.
Everybody needs to relax.

[Anonymous No.4647691]

>>4647638
>posting chinese cartoons on a finnish ice fishing forum

[Anonymous No.4647702]

>>4647640

>linkies unironically dont measure in sats

[Anonymous No.4647710]

>>4646981
well losing against the market average (bitcoin) is doing badly.

[Anonymous No.4647728]

>>4647357
There is no official statement about this. I just said they would synergize very well. Request being used for payments in other currencies can equip LINK for trading. But an announcement isn't that unlikely.

Don't buy now if you think it CAN happen. It's risky. And can happen doesn't mean must happen.

Please, thanks.

[Anonymous No.4647745]

>>4646708
>implying linklets can count their values in anything that isn't sats
lmao

[Anonymous No.4647750]

comon guys, how many memes do I have to make just to get 10 links
please gib some

[Anonymous No.4647766]

>>4647710
>bitcoin
>market average

[Anonymous No.4647828]

>>4647728

i was just wondering where you trade the REQ/USD pairing, that's all.

[Anonymous No.4647921]

>>4647766
its literally >50% of the market cap. its the median average

[Anonymous No.4647943]

I am this close to moving my LINK from the wallet and dump on binance.

please someone tell me one good reason why I shouldn't.

holding 125k LINK btw

[Anonymous No.4647978]

>>4647943

you absolutely, 100% should. my buy order needs to be filled.

[Anonymous No.4647982]

>>4647943
Don't dump them.
Gib me
^^

[Anonymous No.4647985]

>>4647132

Me too. Sending Bitcoin takes so long now. Eth and eth tokens arrive nearly instantaneously.

[Anonymous No.4648008]

>>4647943

Honestly my one fear about this coin is there being too many whales with giant stacks like yours.

Just fucking do it, sell. I am lowering my buy order right now so I can buy your bags cheap as fuck.

[Anonymous No.4648012]

>>4647387

The FUD is made up. Some people made and started pushing the "Sergey is missing" meme. Literally nothing has changed.

[Anonymous No.4648013]

>>4647943
I know nothing about Link anon I have no idea what's going on.

[Anonymous No.4648036]

>>4647828
Don't know any USD/REQ pair, only ETH and BTC/REQ pairs.

[Anonymous No.4648043]

>>4646507
I asked this last time and didn't get a response. I'm looking to invest into LINK because I think it will be fucking huge if it takes off.

What would happen if SWIFT said they were going to use chainlink? Wouldn't that literally make the price just fkn 100x, similar to Ripple?

[Anonymous No.4648084]

>>4648043
>What would happen if SWIFT said they were going to use chainlink?
instant dump to 500 sats probably

[Anonymous No.4648099]

Well, you know they say never to invest more than you can lose. So Im fine with this dip.

I go with all or nothing strategy and choose to hold tight.
You can call me deluded only in hindsight and it still too early to say that CL is a scam/moon mission. So come back in a year.

No link marine is affected by your posts, cos now only iron hands have link.

[Anonymous No.4648182]

Since I didn't go all in I am somewhat relaxed. Especially my ODN made quite some bucks in the last days. I am even thinking about buying some more.

[Anonymous No.4648218]

bought more link last night, probably will buy more today
keep the fud coming

[Anonymous No.4648233]

>>4648084
Shut the fuck up.

Any serious answers?

[Anonymous No.4648753]

>>4648043
Nothing would happen
Only actual implementation can pump link

Swift partnership has been in the air for a long enough time, so ppl got desensitized on CL claiming big partnerships with anybody.

Sergey can post a pic where he's shaking hands with Gates and it won't change anything until we see their net working

[Anonymous No.4648769]

>>4648753
Sorry, that's what I meant. Like what would happen to the price (in years to come obviously) if SWIFT actually did use LINK?

[Anonymous No.4648866]

>>4648769
> in years to come obviously
Well, SWIFT operates with somewhat like $1qdrl a year.
If we treat CL node operators as transaction managers (which they are not) that get 0.1% of each transaction, then we get $1trln to equivalent paid to node operators.

And I have no idea how much a LINK would cost if it let you get a chunk of that sum.

[Anonymous No.4648874]

>>4648769
The key info is when their MainNet is going live. The team are not giving dates but if it's shortly (Q1 2018), then the tech is ready and the value will go up.

If it takes over 6 months or the team will not give any info for months, then it's looking like a long and bearish hold.

Try to keep udated on any MainNet news and you should know where things are at. Bying before MainNet news is very close to gambling.

[Anonymous No.4648905]

>>4648874
No, if people expect it to be another 6 months, then the hold will be short and the price instantly drops to 5-10 cents. Smart money is not in projects that are long bearish.

[Anonymous No.4648938]

jus' hold my friends.

jus' hold

[Anonymous No.4648954]

>>4647943
I sold at a huge loss earlier today.
If you hang around slack you'd know that we're far away from any announcements and it will continue to bleed below 1000 sats.

[Anonymous No.4648971]

>>4648905
That's... pretty much what I was saying? Of course you can sell but I was speculating a scenario where one holds on to Link in hopes of Swift news etc. even if the MainNet was taking long.

[Anonymous No.4648983]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkB9cRmmgF4 [Embed]

watch from 1:23:19 datadash just announced swift rejected partnership with link . GG LINKLETS

[Anonymous No.4648987]

>>4646507
It makes me sick thinking how rich I could be right now if I sold this at it's peak for bitcoin. I still think it's a cool idea, but other stuff like RLC is cool too and never really mooned hard, so there's no guarantee it will take off. I'm only holding a tiny amount now, but hopefully it moves up eventually, at least back to the 20 cent range.

[Anonymous No.4649050]

>>4648954
>buy LINK high
>sell it at the absolute lowest point possible to join the bitcoin rat race even later than millions of new normies

you're not going to make it

[Anonymous No.4649097]

Isn't there a big december announcement coming? Isn't it a big dumb to start selling now?

[Anonymous No.4649100]

>>4648983
He is just fudding
There are no news on the failed partnership

That kike sure is accumulating LINK now

[Anonymous No.4649119]

>>4649050
Why would I hold it?

Bitcoin broke 11k and will surely continue to go up while LINK will go down.
It could easily go below 1000 sats very soon, look at the buy wall it's so easy to dump LINK.

[Anonymous No.4649148]

W-why did this happen? Was it all the world's biggest P&D?

[Anonymous No.4649179]

>>4649119
buy high sell low

[Anonymous No.4649194]

>>4649148
Only 90% down from satoshi ATH.
It would need to 10x just to go back to previoush ATH.

It's literally DGB.

>>4649179
>sell low
>buy lower

[Anonymous No.4649218]

>>4649100
/biz is A class entertainment right there.

[Anonymous No.4649247]

>>4649218
Nothing funny here
LINK is the future king. Just you wait until the eoy annoncements from Sergey

[Anonymous No.4649272]

>>4649194

That's because BTC is going parabolic. Sats don't matter anyways unless you are a retared BTC maximalist.

It was 51 cents at ATH during Sibos. All it needs to do is 3x itself to get back to 51 cents since it's at 17 cents currently, already rose from 15 cents to 17 cents in the last few minutes.

[Anonymous No.4649305]

>>4649247
Yeah can't wait for another dump due to a shitty announcement from a missing CEO.

>>4649272
>sats don't matter
Sats always mattered, this is some newfag crap.
Only when a coin has USD trading pair I'll say that sats don't matter.

[Anonymous No.4649374]

>>4649305
GWEI matter, bitch

[Anonymous No.4649379]

>>4649305


>buy $2000 worth of ETH
>trade it for $2000 worth of Chainlink at 17 cents
>Chainlink raises to 34 cents in December
>trade all your Chainlink for ETH
>cash out that ETH for $4000

Wow dollars don't matter MUH SATS

[Anonymous No.4649411]

>>4649272

Rory just confirmed Chainlink-SWIFT is not cancelled. This DATADASH guy is a cuck liar. The screencap is incoming.

[Anonymous No.4649442]

>>4649119
>look at the buy wall it's so easy to dump LINK.

yeah, you're totally dumping on those morons. who in their right mind would buy LINK right now, am i right? see what your problem is here? hindsight mentality. you only buy when something is massively hyped, and you end up with bags. then you hold those bags for like a month because of your "iron hands", but after a while you can't stand out on missing those other moon missions, so you sell at a massive loss, only to make exactly the same mistake again.
i don't even know why i'm wasting my time typing this, you people should learn this shit the hard way.

[Anonymous No.4649464]

>>4649411
>Rory just confirmed Chainlink-SWIFT is not cancelled
fake

[Anonymous No.4649466]

meanwhile eth is mooning and up nearly 100% since link ico. RIPPPP

[Anonymous No.4649539]

I think I know where this fun is coming from,

>>read between the lines

Swift fucking confirmed

[Anonymous No.4649564]

rory knows nothing, been confirmed dozens of times

[Anonymous No.4649676]

>>4649464
>>4649539

you've been BTFO. If even Rory knows about SWIFT LINK it's common knowledge. Sergey is going to have to make a statement. This is huge.

[Anonymous No.4649686]

>>4649539

Damage control

[Anonymous No.4649725]

>>4649539
>>4649676
NO! NO! CRASH AND BURN!!!! CRASH AND BURN!!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.4649885]

>>4646983
sorry, *her* penis

[Anonymous No.4650039]

>>4649539
Wait, when did Rory post this?

[Anonymous No.4650097]

>>4649539
What, specifically, in this document should I be looking at?

[Anonymous No.4650172]

>>4649539

Rory's inability to spell is fucking annoying, and accounts for at least 3% of the price drop.

[Lieutenant Colonel Damu No.4650230]

>>4650039
less than 1 hr ago

[Anonymous No.4650266]

>>4649539
https://www.sibos.com/sites/default/files/sibos_toronto_2017_sibos_issues_wrapup_edition.pdf

[Anonymous No.4650316]

>>4649539
there is no mention of chainlink, smart contracts, oracles or Sergey in this document.

[Anonymous No.4650373]

>>4650316
This. I am confused

[Anonymous No.4650515]

President and CEO of the Royal Bank of Canada:

“Blockchain could have an important role
to play and could be the technology that
transforms money moving and money storing.
We are realistic that the technology is still in
its infancy, but are excited by its potential,”
he said. “The opportunity to decentralise our
record-keeping and remove third parties could
significantly reduce friction, lower cost and
increase the cadence at which we operate.”
RBC is exploring the technology’s
potential via a number of initiatives spanning
its personal, commercial and capital markets
businesses. A blockchain-based shadow
ledger for cross-border payments between
the US and Canada launched recently, and the co-launch of a pilot programme with
JP Morgan and ANZ Banking Group, which
deploys blockchain for global payments.
“We are watching the performance
of all our blockchain pilots very carefully
and are aware of the need to clarify legal,
regulatory and security questions, including
around the enforceability and d reversibility of
transactions,” McKay said.

[Anonymous No.4650616]

>>4650515
Tom Casteleyn, head of product
management for custody, cash and FX at BNY
Mellon:

Post-blockchain, I see the role of the global
custodian as linking blockchains together
and making sure there is interoperability
between them.”

[Anonymous No.4650822]

>>4650230

[Anonymous No.4650842]

>>4649539
Jesus christ, why the fuck did you faggots tell me to sell? I WILL FUCKING END YOU /BIZ/ IF IT MOONS NOW

[Anonymous No.4650886]

>>4649539
Link can't moon no matter what.

[Anonymous No.4650887]

>>4649539
>>4650266
I haven't completely examined this doc, but there doesn't seem to be anything in there outside of some positive references to 20022 and pilot projects.
Going to keep perusing.

Anyway, this document was published on 2 November it seems, so it's hardly news.

Meanwhile here's a more recent publication from 15 November by SWIFT itself (not Sibos), directly referencing the Chainlink proof of concept:
https://www.swift.com/file/45401/download?token=1SlvZHKA
(direct PDF download)

See pic.
Swift considers ISO 20022 the future of global (financial) networks, and lists the Chainlink PoC as one of the key examples of ISO 20022 implementation. Right alongside other major projects like Swift's flagship GPI project.

Maybe Rory meant to post this link?

[Anonymous No.4650916]

>>4650842

Thanks for selling me your bags at a discount mate. Don't worry I will let you buy them back off me at a premium soon.

[Anonymous No.4650959]

>>4646818
if link explodes I promise i will call riley reid to fuck her.

[Anonymous No.4650960]

>>4650515
>>4650616
These quotes are from >>4650266 btw.

They've clearly been piloting LINK. How far they are down the road is another question.

[Anonymous No.4650982]

>>4650266

Not one mention of LINK.
lol my god...linkies never change.
RIP

[Anonymous No.4651114]

>>4650887
WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK
THIS IS YUUUUGE
START ACCUMULATE NOW

[Anonymous No.4651252]

All those nocoiner and weak hands hahhahahahahahahhahahahaa

[Anonymous No.4651387]

>>4651252
Eh link ain't doing nothing pal. Why are you happy.

[Anonymous No.4651516]

>>4650982
you're an idiot, they'd never directly mention the names of companies they're working with in a report like this. if you actually did your research you'd come to the conclusion that it's almost certain they're talking about the chainlink project.
but that's the thing, your research reaches as far as checking out twitter pages and watching "crypto experts" on youtube.

[Lieutenant Colonel Damu No.4651553]

>>4651387
Why aren't you?

[Anonymous No.4651587]

>>4648874
>If it takes over 6 months
Thing is, I don't care if it's 6 months or 3 years. If you look at something like Eth, I'm sure people were saying it was dumb to hold it in 2013.

I get what you're saying, but I have a few thousand I can just leave and don't need to trade with right now, so might just put it in.

>>4648866
>$1qdrl a year.
Alright fuck I'm putting it in. I just read their newsletter from the SIBOS conference and they are really keen on using blockchain technology. Dam, this might legit be our chance.

[Anonymous No.4651634]

>>4650982
>Not one mention of LINK.
Holy fuck you are stupid.

>>4650887
I think what he meant by it was saying that they are very bullish on blockchain technology. We already know SWIFT is working with LINK, so I see zero reason why they wouldn't actually use them.

Yeah fuck me I'm putting $10k into this. This is gigantic.

[Anonymous No.4651667]

>>4646507
Time to accumulate faggots

[Anonymous No.4651756]

>>4650266
>>4649539
One thing from this publication that seems very relevant to Link is this:

"The European Union’s second
Payments Services Directive (PSD2) and
the UK’s Open Banking Initiative, due to
come into effect from 2018, both mandate
use of standardised open APIs to facilitate
access to bank customers’ transaction and
account data."

This is actually pretty amazing, Chainlink basically runs on open APIs.

[Anonymous No.4651777]

>>4650887
Delete this