/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.4552203]

>mfw he doesn't use quadratic programming to max gains, while minimizing risk
>mfw he has never heard of a Markowitz model
Are you kids even trying?

[Anonymous No.4552229]

>>4552203
>he thinks anything but the 300 day moving average matters

simple will get you far, kid

[Anonymous No.4552250]

>he doesn't use non-standard models of arithmetic to calculate dips

[Anonymous No.4552257]

>>4552203
Interesting. I'll look into this.

[Anonymous No.4552303]

>>4552229
>simple will get you far, kid
In the age of big data? Who are you kidding? Look, it's very simple: the data is there, the models are there, some people will use it, buy a yacht and hire a bunch of bitches, while the rest can go to peanuts hell. Not knowing any better is one thing. Ignorance, however...

[Anonymous No.4552318]

>He doesn't know of quasi-parabolic Markov probability models and their applications in studying chaotic activity such as market trading

Do you intend to remain penniless eternally?

[Anonymous No.4552366]

>not using dynamic linear models to determine regression shrinkage on leveraged bitcoin future swaps while minimizing volatility using a ergodic markov model with multivariate kernel smoothing

[Anonymous No.4552404]

>>4552203
doesn't matter because you can't actually cash anything out so the "gains" are just entertainment

BTC is just a videogame where you pay as much as you want

[Anonymous No.4552412]

>>4552366

I have no idea what the fuck that means. I am so happy I stopped trading.

[Anonymous No.4552415]

>>4552404
>not understanding any of this
>at least memes are funny

[Anonymous No.4552440]

>>4552366
>not generalizing your models' statistical envelopes using Jacobian variety vector bundles to more efficiently use your computational resources

[Anonymous No.4552501]

>>4552440
>he doesn't have access to a quantum computer utilizing topological cluster states to determine the scalability of contango-backwardation ratios for multiplexed predictive markets

[Anonymous No.4552511]

>he does not base his prediction cumming on charts

[Anonymous No.4552547]

>>4552501
>he needs a quantum computer to calculate the trivial monad price points of a first order elliptic curve

[Anonymous No.4552560]

>he doesn't put crypto names on a grid, put a chicken on the grid, and go all-in on the square that the chicken shits on first

[Anonymous No.4552606]

>>4552560
>he doesn't play chicken on the grid 2
>now with even more gains, and headless chickn
also japs. Fuckers like silly games. Oh well, good for them.

[Anonymous No.4552671]

“I can calculate the movement of stars, but not the madness of men.”

https://www.sovereignman.com/finance/how-isaac-newton-went-flat-broke-chasing-a-stock-bubble-13268/

Derivatives certainly are enhanced with quantitative approaches. But, I find getting too mathsy-watsy about human behavior, in financial markets, to be overkill. Unless of course other people are doing roughly the same thing, in which case you can play on the self-fulfilling prophecy.

[Anonymous No.4552751]

>he doesn‘t go all in on memes

[Anonymous No.4552841]

>>4552671
>implying Sir Newton an idiot (geek/specialist)
you know kid, there is a reason that throughout history there always was the inventor and the entrepreneur. It's a dreamteam. Inventors on their own were left to starve with their brilliant (but unpractical) inventions, and as for the entrepreneur, the art of making shekkels out of thin air hasn't been perfected back then, and even now, a good invention makes things ever so easier.

[Anonymous No.4552856]

>>4552841
there's a "wasn't" missing up there. Eh... you'll fiure it out by yourself.

[Anonymous No.4552905]

>>4552841
But OP, it's so much funner to envision yourself as a General leading your soldiers (each individual dollar) into battle against the market. Forming alliances, backstabbing, deception. To approach it from a psychological manner is so much more interesting. Although, it's much harder to have variables and metrics to monitor, and measure, and compare with that approach. I get it :)

[Anonymous No.4553091]

>>4552547
>First order elliptical

Get the fuck out of here you fucking casual bitch

[Anonymous No.4553376]

>not being born with the warren buffet sharinga

[Anonymous No.4553405]

>>4553091
>needing anything else

supreme pleb

[Anonymous No.4553494]

>>4552856
>not having a self-learning A.I. digital identity linked through your full-body suit onahole-neural interface to proof read your thoughts posted for you.

[Anonymous No.4553905]

>>4552203
>>4552318
>>4552366
>>4552440
>>4552501

>he doesn't use lyapunov functions with feedback linearization to implement passivity-based high-gain observers to stabilize integral control

Lmao it's like you hate money.

[Anonymous No.4553987]

>>4553905
>not realizing that Eigenmatrix reduction across higher dimensional complex Riemannian manifolds was demonstrated to be a more efficient method of market analysis in 1973

even the pajeets begging for money here know this

[Anonymous No.4554033]

>>4553987
>not implementing higher order functional design applied to the span of quaternion subtopological space whilst solving nonlinear concave programming

no wonder you're bleeding money even the chinks use this

[Anonymous No.4554207]

I like this board

[Anonymous No.4554234]

>>4552203
hi i was on wikipedia today! here are some cool words i saw!

[Anonymous No.4554318]

>>4554234
if anything it shows there are some engineer/math students on /biz/
you all deserve it brahs
we're all gonna make it

[Anonymous No.4554514]

>>4554234
>implying math modelling isn't a buttload of fun
getting your hands dirty > reading the pedia jew

[Anonymous No.4554550]

>>4554234

[Anonymous No.4554751]

>>4554234
>not being on Wikipedia