No communication, 2 Developers

[Anonymous No.4473829]

Why should i buy your bags? These retards have a 2 man team when projects with half the marketcap have 20+ and update twitter/reddit/bitcointalk daily. Admit it you bought a pump and dump and got fucked for your money.

[Anonymous No.4473849]

okay. i admit. Dont buy it

[Anonymous No.4473860]

>>4473829
Pretty sure Sergey counts as two developers nowadays on account of all the cheeseburgers he's been eating

[Anonymous No.4473868]

Link is yet to pump

Foh gaybo

[CeCsBNu79wzWDxZ3wNRqt518iHW4fJ(...) No.4473878]

>>4473829
>>4473849
#4CHNalldau

[Anonymous No.4473886]

>>4473829
please just pump this a little so i can get my money back please please please

[Anonymous No.4473892]

one drops of news and this thing will fuckin explode. will it catch on long term? who knows

[Anonymous No.4473911]

>>4473829
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kW27zYIxZhY

[Anonymous No.4473917]

Admit it you delusional faggots you lost your money to a smart pump and dump group.

[Anonymous No.4473932]

>>4473917
but I haven't lost money :/

[Anonymous No.4473992]

>>4473829
Just watch the first 2 minutes of >>4473911 understand what he's actually saying, then think how important this is for crypto and how lucrative it would be if they pull this off

If you're not convinced then don't buy

[Anonymous No.4474050]

>>4473829
greedy retards think if they have less people on project they will make more when link moons too bad it never will because crypto will be dead by the time they get anything done.

[Anonymous No.4474089]

>>4473829
It took my 5 seconds to realize link was junk. How can you be so stupid to fall for these stupid shill threads???

[Anonymous No.4474132]

>>4473829
>when projects with half the marketcap have 20+ and update twitter/reddit/bitcointalk daily
Exactly

[Anonymous No.4474139]

>>4473860
He's always counted as two
>Sergey
>rory

[Anonymous No.4474246]

>>4473829
I have 30K in Link. It's 92% of my stack.

I'm going to trade the other 8 percent. People say I'm losing money holding Link but it's not like I'm catching every pump and I'm down 14% on my trading stack.

This rocket isn't going to the moon without me or to hell without me.

[Anonymous No.4474336]

There isn't even a bitcoin talk ANN thread
Let that sink in for a moment

[Anonymous No.4474340]

>>4473829
Fuck off retard, you failed to mention the ACTUAL PARTNERSHIPS of ChainLink. For example LINK and Confido are confirmed partners, here's what the latter had to say about LINK:

>We recently made the switch from Oraclize to Chainlink because of the decentralised aspect of Chainlink. The way we use Chainlink is pretty simple; our smart contracts track packages by using multi-carrier shipping API’s like Easypost and Postmen to view the delivery status of a package. We connect to, and pull data from, these API’s using Chainlink.
>Before we made the switch from Oraclize to Chainlink we relied on one single API to serve us the correct data, which simply wasn’t secure enough when dealing with people’s money. Chainlink allowed us to stay decentralised and improve the security of our platform by allowing us to pull data from several API’s.
>We are bullish on LINK and hope to accelerate the adoption by using it in our own project. There are so many use cases for LINK, our project is just one of them.

If you can't see what a big deal this is then you deserve to stay poor. There will be many more developers like them that see the light and make the switch!

[Anonymous No.4474354]

>>4474340
Hey dick head the confido devs just dumped everything they had in reserve and shut the project down

[Anonymous No.4474361]

>>4473829
Don't buy. Let me buy more.

[Anonymous No.4474373]

>>4474340
funny thing is there I don't think the LINK guys ever said anything about confide
>>4474354
it's FUD m8

[Anonymous No.4474400]

Confido seeing LINK as useful is still good. All coins that use external data will find it useful.

[Anonymous No.4474457]

>>4473911
The better question is if there is anyone else out there doign the same thing, but with an actual team already in place.

[Anonymous No.4474479]

>>4474457
Only pajeet copy catters

You realize they've been working on this for 4 years right? They are well ahead.

[Anonymous No.4474526]

>>4474139
rory isn't a dev

[Anonymous No.4474577]

>>4474400
>Confido seeing LINK as useful is still good. All coins that use external data will find it useful.

No they won't you fucking pajeet. Anyone who wants to incorporate data with their contracts will do the non-sub 30 IQ way: making a web application

[Anonymous No.4474641]

>>4474457
This is literally the only thing I'm worried about

Sooner or later we're going to need a trustless way of getting external data onto the blockchain

I'm confident chainlink is furthest ahead though

[Anonymous No.4474734]

>>4474340
Find a quote from anyone involved with Chainlink that they have had anything to do with Confido

You can't

[Anonymous No.4474775]

>>4474577
>No they won't you fucking pajeet. Anyone who wants to incorporate data with their contracts will do the non-sub 30 IQ way: making a web application
Someone clearly doesn't understand what ChainLink does...

[Anonymous No.4474806]

>>4474577
what would you rather do?
>hire a dev
>make him maintain it
>have to deal with humans and BS
or
>pay a small fee
>computers do everything
>no upkeep at all

[Anonymous No.4474819]

If nothing happens by the beginning of January, I'm pulling out. Then it's going to fucking skyrocket to $20.

[Anonymous No.4474859]

>>4474819
Thus is life

[Anonymous No.4475531]

>>4473917
you cant lose money if you dont sell them or throw them away on dice

[Anonymous No.4475543]

>>4473829

>Satoshi is more than one person

>2 man team

>20 man team