[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 102 KB, 203x250, rentfree.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4196933 No.4196933 [Reply] [Original]

I bought 400k LINK through ICO and I won't sell until 2019. If this project succeeds how rich will I be?

>> No.4196980

>>4196933
For someone as cocky as you you shouldn't have these many doubts.
https://youtu.be/6Ejga4kJUts?t=1m34s

>> No.4197052

$10 each link. you do the math

>> No.4197083

>>4196980
Garbagio Music Taste Friendo No Offenso.

>> No.4197084

>>4197052
If it's listed on GDAX and there are any major announcements it will be $20 by March.

>> No.4197094

>>4197084
>LINK
>gdax
kek
nothing is getting added to gdax any time soon

>> No.4197096

>>4197084
The GDAX alt exchange announced? How likely is it that LINK would be included.

>> No.4197106

>>4197094
GDAX announced a new exchange for altcoins the which is why REQfags are so excited because they think their coin will be included.

>> No.4197110

>>4197094
https://blog.gdax.com/gdax-digital-asset-framework-c875988acce8

The game has changed.

>>4197096
Fairly high after it launches nodes.

>> No.4197119
File: 12 KB, 232x162, IMG_0959.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4197119

>>4197083
Rent free

>> No.4197125

>>4197106
>>4197110
so when is this gdax altcoin exchange being launched?

>> No.4197131
File: 67 KB, 540x534, 1454556440555.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4197131

>>4197084
>gdax listing an erc20 token

>> No.4197140

>>4197125
No timeline given. Presumably not until next year.

https://www.gdax.com/static/digital-asset-framework-2017-11.pdf

Is the framework so if a given coin fails those requirements then it won't be listed. Privacy coins fail one of them so likely no XMR.

>> No.4197145

>>4197131
havent you been reading the other replies? were talking about the GDAX Digital Asset Framework recently announced. they're getting into the altgame because they're pissed of Bittrex and Binance getting the profits.

>> No.4197155

>>4197140
I'm confused why would it take them a year to do this? they have an exchange already right? they just have to add the trading pairs.

>> No.4197167

>>4197155
It won't take them a year. By next year I mean a few months which is next year. I'm sure they have to do all kinds of cert shit and other due diligence before listing assets.

>> No.4197216

>>4196933
I have a bit of my portfolio in link too (bought at ICO) but I have 1 simple question to you bagholders:
Why should 1 LINK be worth 20c? Why 30?
The project is a great one based on an idea that's not really original but an interesting attempt to tackle the centralized oracles.
But don't forget there are other ways to accomplish tasks on the blockchain where the “oracle problem“ is not even relevant.
I know you are all bagholding and trying to shill this token but please answer this simple question: Why should it rise in value?