/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.4032698]

Who here bought LINK @ $.46+ ?

[Anonymous No.4032720]

>>4032698
I did, and sold at .40 cents at a loss which apparently was one of the best ideas I made this month.
I don't have a lot of good ideas.

[Anonymous No.4032726]

at least LINK is way better than DGB.. hold strong anon

[Anonymous No.4032730]

>>4032720
>Selling a loss

[Anonymous No.4032748]

Literally everyone except the redditors.

>tfw too intelligent to pay less than 40 cents for Link

[Anonymous No.4032761]

>>4032720
>Buy high, sell low
Why am I not surprised?

[Anonymous No.4032777]

Bought at 40 cents. Later bought shit loads again at 25 cents.

[Anonymous No.4032793]

Bought at ICO sold at 40 cents. You guys are dumbasses

[Anonymous No.4032822]

>>4032698
It's easy to second guess yourself now but I can see the future and in 6 months you're going to look like a genius buying at that price.

[Anonymous No.4032853]

>>4032698

[Anonymous No.4032860]

>>4032698
>tfw you bought at $.38, $.34, and $.32

[Anonymous No.4032888]

>>4032698
yep

[Anonymous No.4032908]

>>4032698
How many people here actually have more than 200k Link?

[Anonymous No.4032914]

Anyone else been day trading this coin. I've managed to increase my holdings by 25% and it gives me something to occupy my time with while I wait for it to moon

[Anonymous No.4032924]

>bought 16k LINKS at 8k sats a piece

[Anonymous No.4032925]

>>4032908
Probably a small handful.

[Anonymous No.4032928]

>LINK isn't the only coin tackling oracles
>most LINK is held by devs (90%)
>will still inflate 3x its current supply
>no customer base as of yet
>transaction fees going into the LINK system will actually be very small, thus little profit for hodlers
>shamelessly shilled on /biz/
>10x returns!
>2 devs 1 white paper at one time quarter a billion marketcap
>all for a business that hasn't produced anything at all

huehuehuehuehuehue

[Anonymous No.4032962]

>>4032925
I know I've seen a few people here with 1m+.

I wonder where 120k falls into the holdings chart.

[Anonymous No.4032979]

>>4032698
haha
dumass
laffin @ (you)
but really, once LINK hits $100 it won't matter

[Anonymous No.4032980]

>>4032928
I can make the same greentext FUD for any coin in the top 20. What piece of shit are you holding dude? Let me guess, omg and neo you fucking reddit cancer.

[Anonymous No.4032985]

>>4032962
Im holding 136k but most here are holding 50k or less.

[Anonymous No.4033026]

>>4032980
Nope, I'm a deluded ARKie. FUD away, you also didn't counter argue any of my points.

>because you know I'm right :^)

[Anonymous No.4033049]

>>4032980

spotted the asshurt deluded linkie

[Anonymous No.4033145]

>>4032979
>once LINK hits $100

Hueeeeeeeeeehuehuehuehuehuehuehue why just $100?

Clearly you a newfag that can't realize Link will hit $692 next month (hint: top secret insider here)

Huehueheuheuhhehue

[Anonymous No.4033147]

question to all linkies
why are you so obsessed with this coin?
is it because the shills on here convinced you to buy it and now you're trying to damage control your shitty decision?

[Anonymous No.4033206]

>>4032730
>holding a loss

[Anonymous No.4033207]

>>4033147
They think its the only coin that is attempting to do what its doing. They got shilled on hard by /biz/, didn't read the whitepaper/research at all, bought really fucking high, etc...

[Anonymous No.4033901]

>>4032928
>no customer base as of yet
That's the whole point, to invest at the very early beginning.
Maybe a nice savings account is more your thing anon.

[Anonymous No.4034127]

>>4033901
The demand for smart contracts is pathetic. At least for something like ARK the goal is to link blockchains together. The demand for blockchain tech as a whole is increasing. That's the difference.

[Anonymous No.4034308]

>>4034127
>The demand for smart contracts is pathetic.
Lmao.
Smart contracts are one of the hottest items when it comes to the future of finance.

Let me give you a few examples of some of the industry's most significant influencers.
I chose these examples because they not only discuss the importance of smart contracts, but specifically mention Smartcontract.com by name.

WEF: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GAC15_Technological_Tipping_Points_report_2015.pdf#page=24
World economic forum talking about smart contracts and crypto as a technological tipping point, specifically mentioning Chainlink/Smartcontract.com by name

Capgemini: https://www.capgemini.com/consulting/wp-content/uploads/sites/30/2017/07/smart-contracts.pdf
Massive consultancy and IT firm Capgemini devoting an entire report to the importance of smart contracts, specifically mentioning Chainlink/Smartcontract.com and Sergey Nazarov by name as the only providers of a smart contract solution that can use external data

SWIFT: https://www.swift.com/node/39911
SWIFT itself saying how "Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) and Smart Contracts (SC) promise to transform automation in the financial industry, and are generating huge interest amongst financial institutions and technology providers."

Gartner: (see pic)

tl;dr not only are the very biggest global economic players tripping over themselves to adopt blockchain tech, they are specifically lusting after smart contracts, AND mentioning Chainlink/Smartcontract.com specifically.

[Anonymous No.4034989]

>>4034308
don't feed the fudder

[Anonymous No.4035081]

>bought at .32 and .36 $
>sold at .42$ to buy better coins
>"Oh look it's 25 cents" and bought back
Feeling pretty good, now I can just HODL for ever

[Anonymous No.4035345]

>>4033145
>$692

My algos average out to $588 by December, but I mostly agree otherwise