Gender Politics in Crypto

[Anonymous No.3985793]

It's coming

[Anonymous No.3985799]

[Anonymous No.3985808]

TWO GENDERS? TWO FUCKING GENDERS???? ARE YOU FUCKERS IN 1417 OR SOMETHING?

[Anonymous No.3985810]

>>3985793
>16% roasties

please tell me 90% or more of that is LARPers

[Anonymous No.3985812]

>>3985793
Heh girls suck at economics though.

[Anonymous No.3985826]

You have to be kidding me with those tweets. Who the hell cares if you are m/f for buying a fucking coin.

[Anonymous No.3985827]

shit

[Anonymous No.3985833]

fuckin hell...

[Anonymous No.3985837]

How is that absurd

Everyone can buy crypto
Everyone can trade crypto

This is legit proof it's women's fault. This is completely anonymous and accessible to anyone that can afford it.

Spend less money on make-up and you'll be able to buy this

[Anonymous No.3985846]

>>3985793

>men are more likely to take risks
>main sites where crypto are talked about are primarily male use
>men still have more money today

How does this surprise anyone that it's mostly men in crypto?

[Anonymous No.3985851]

To be honest, its likely not about gender politics and more a ploy to get more people on the ecosystem.

((("join eth ecosystem and fight against (((men)))")))

[Anonymous No.3985875]

I don't see how asserting that is a bad thing.

It's probably a very similar ratio with personal stock portfolios. Women are terrible with money and have a la-dee-da attitude towards finance. They want equality and progress but still assume the man will pay for everything and keep things running financially in marriage. That post is only masked as leftist.

[Anonymous No.3985878]

>>3985799
Holy fucking Kek

Never buying that shot coin in my life just cause of this

From now on only investing in Chad run companies

[Anonymous No.3985884]

zero barrier to entry for women, literally nobody knows what sex you are when you buy bitcoin on coinbase.

time to wake up to the fact that women aren't men and arent interested in the same things.

[Anonymous No.3985885]

https://www.women-coin.com

Q: why is it called women-coin?
A: because it is worth a shit.

[Anonymous No.3985889]

>>3985884
everyone likes money though.

[Anonymous No.3985891]

>>3985878
myetherwallet is a coin now?

[Anonymous No.3985894]

only women should be allowed to trade crypto

fucking white supremacy again

[Anonymous No.3985903]

>>3985889
women do not want to take any risks to get money, thats the difference

[Anonymous No.3985904]

>>3985891
Did you even look at the pic?
It's SingularDTV.

[Anonymous No.3985905]

I mean, girls are welcome to lose their money on shitcoins with the rest of us

[Anonymous No.3985906]

>>3985884
fucking sexist

[Anonymous No.3985907]

>>3985878

DIONS, bro

[Anonymous No.3985922]

>>3985903
statistically*

>>3985905
i'm sure people will argue that to make things fair, women should only be allowed to lose 80% of what men lose, to encourage more of them to enter this space.

[Anonymous No.3985926]

>>3985903
women like shopping though, and crypto makes shopping faster.

They wont be investing, but they will be the end-users.

[Anonymous No.3985928]

woman dont worry about making money as much as man
they have things in life way easier

[Anonymous No.3985930]

>>3985793
Lol look at all the small-dicked assholes responding in this thread.

Grow up boys. Crypto isn't your fascist safe space any longer. Hopefully soon legislation will be passed to redistribute coins from white men to women and PoC.

Ideally it would come in the form of a tax that progressively increases based on existing wealth, masculinity, and lack of minority status. Maybe for once we can start an industry that isn't founded on oppression.

[Anonymous No.3985942]

>>3985793
>Women hate free markets
>Women need to be enticed into everything

In short women are children.

[Anonymous No.3985952]

>>3985930

[Anonymous No.3985953]

>>3985793
women are brainlets, what do you expect?
we got niggers in crypto before women

[Anonymous No.3985970]

>>3985889
I don't think women like money as much as men. Women just want enough to be financially stable, men want more and more and more

[Anonymous No.3985985]

>>3985891
He's talking about SNGL.

You absolute retard.

[Anonymous No.3985990]

>>3985970
Yeah, because men want to and are expected to offer financial stability to their significant other/children.

women who go down that path end up unhappy because they don't know how to juggle a love life and have reasonable standards as they move up the ladder.

[Anonymous No.3985996]

>>3985846
? Men are not more likely to take risks. Women and men have the exact same capabilities, you are being insanely sexist. The environment guides women into not buying crypto, it's the fault of the patriarchy, and we must all help make sure women feel welcome.

[Anonymous No.3986007]

>>3985930
i would literally beat the living shit out of you if i met you and you quoted that to me.

[Anonymous No.3986023]

>>3985930
you`re saying as if this is a bad thing
fuck me if more roasties and shitskins are joining the shitcoins bandwaggon our profits will tripple in price
the more the marrier

[Anonymous No.3986033]

>>3985970
Men make the majority of money and women spend the majority if it.
They expect a man to provide for them in exchange for the means to reproduce. It's been this way for millenia.

[Anonymous No.3986034]

feminists are fucking stupid. everything they touch turns against them.
look at gamergate, a whole sub-culture which never spent a single thought about this (in opposite, a community who still is open for women in gaming) became a political force, they fucking turn into right wing death squads when it comes to feminism in the video games industry.

they. fuck. up. everything.

[Anonymous No.3986048]

>>3985990
>>3986033
You may be right, I'm not discussing the reason behind this

[Anonymous No.3986054]

>>3985851

exactly, this is blatant advertising

[Anonymous No.3986058]

>>3986033
CRASHING THIS ANCESTRAL PARADIGM WITH NO FEMALE SURVIVOR

[Anonymous No.3986064]

>>3985793
was just about to send kink i just bought i MEW, wont be using these faggot cucks anymore. Wont ever be buying faggot SNGLS either. i love the faggot commies that are getting into crypto now, you can tell theyre the ones making the wojak threads cause theyre retard faggots who cant think.

[Anonymous No.3986067]

Its smart advertising, who gives a fuck what a wallet says on its twitter! It's just bringing in eyes. This is only a good thing!

More end users! I say keep doing it for the lulz!

[Anonymous No.3986068]

>>3985793
the irony in that tweet is that almost no women is even interested in cryptos yet alone follows any twitter handles related to crypto
so this news reaches mostly men as the majority
so who the fuck are they advertising this too
fucking kek

[Anonymous No.3986069]

>>3986034
I just wanted to play bideo games.

[Anonymous No.3986074]

>>3985793
"I heard he trades crypto"

[Anonymous No.3986075]

>>3985930
my sides

[Anonymous No.3986076]

>>3986068
Wait till Vox or any other mainstream media starts reporting on gender-bias in crypto. Honestly we should be leaving those websites tips on this news.

[Anonymous No.3986078]

>>3985930

This give me an idea
a socialist coin

>one central regulator (a world's government, for instance) controls the supply
>every time you acummulate more than the avarege, every other wallet is given coin to equals your's
>every time you fall below average, you gain coins to match the average
>every one will NEED to accept TFSJ (Token For Social Justice) or will go to jail
>if you get seek or need food, the central regulator will buy it to you generating new coins

[Anonymous No.3986081]

>>3985827
I need this

[Anonymous No.3986087]

fuck i hate this "we need more womenz!!!" crap. Yes we want more people using crypto and it could be valuable to advertise specifically to women but women unto themselves do not bring a new perspective and they are not needed for any kind of development, if anything it's the fucking opposite

[Anonymous No.3986088]

>>3985793
>myetherwallet
those virtue signal larper nigger faggots can suck a dick.

[Anonymous No.3986111]

>>3986076
honestly
do you really those that follow those mainsteam media outlets would even comprehend what cryptocoins are

> yo like what the fuck are cryptocoins bruh, is it those golden coins with chocolate inside? ye i want sum gibsmedat

[Anonymous No.3986119]

[Anonymous No.3986122]

i intentionally will not invest in a coin if i see that the dev team is (((diverse))) I know first hand how cancerous a bunch of entitled women and minorities can be to a project. Most of them aren't can't even comprehend that they might be wrong about something, as soon as you call them out on something they instantly revert to the victim mentality. REEEEEEE MANSPLAINING REEEEEEEE INSTITUTIONAL RACISM REEEEEE PAY GAP. Crypto is driven by data....not by fucking feelings.

[Anonymous No.3986127]

This is good.
>women will be our new bagholders that we always dump on

[Anonymous No.3986133]

>>3986058
Yup. Artificial wombs and passable sex dolls - we've very nearly got both - will render women who aren't willing to actually act like women (and thus be decent feminine wives and mothers) will render the majority of women worthless. Will be amusing to see how quickly the masculinization of Western females over the last 50-100 years is reversed when they begin to realize they genuinely are not needed and that they'll actually have to make an effort again to get a man.

[Anonymous No.3986153]

>>3986111
no, but they don't even need to comprehend it to join in and buy a bit.

Articles would talk up crypto just because womens are not on it.

its normie bait, am I over thinking this or could it just work?

[Anonymous No.3986165]

>>3986078
>>3986076

Wait hold on, how can we capitalize off of this? Could we market it in some way to get a fuckking tonne of new stupid money in>

Something like "There is currently the largest transfer of wealth happening. Crytpocurrency will be 12.5% of world GDP by 2025.

Women already make 70% less than men for the EXACT same type of work. We can't let this male-dominated financial sector exclude women any longer.

Decentralized is another way of saying shared worldwide; yet over 86% of cryptocurrency holders are WHITE MALES in their 20-40s. Doesn't sound like everyone has their fair share to me."

Who's got social media accounts/profiles? It would be amazing if 4chan got the radical fems into crypto and we just take their money

[Anonymous No.3986166]

>>3985810
Probably 10 out of the 16 are trannies.

[Anonymous No.3986177]

>>3985793
where did they even get that statistic? I have never told anyone my gender when I bought or traded crypto

[Anonymous No.3986186]

As a woman I am deeply disgusted by these responses on 4chan. Women have a hard enough time being discriminated against in STEM jobs. We don't need sexism in crypto too. Maybe if you guys could get off your computer and out of your parents basement you would realize that there is a world going on out there and other people have feelings too. How would you feel if you were only 16% of something, if you were a minority? You would feel unsafe like I do every time I go to /biz/. We need federal legislation to end crypto and STEM discrimination since it's clear that people like yourselves won't listen to reason.

[Anonymous No.3986187]

>>3985793
This is good. New money flowing into crypto attached to weak hands.

[Anonymous No.3986193]

>>3985996
(you)

[Anonymous No.3986194]

>>3986165
most of /biz/ would only be able to capitalize off of them if they were convinced to buy into shitcoins.

But we're onto something. Time to load up those twitter sockpuppets.

[Anonymous No.3986201]

>>3986127
>>3986187
Almost the same post lel

[Anonymous No.3986212]

>>3986186
post tits or gtfo

[Anonymous No.3986219]

>>3986186
>As a woman...
stopped reading there

[Anonymous No.3986221]

>>3986133

You still need eggs to make kids tho, you don't need sperm as the egg can use its own DNA? Armys of clone wimmins.

[Anonymous No.3986222]

>>3986186
women aren't discriminated in STEM, in fact they're given every advantage possible, more so than men. Problem is women are just dumb, weak minded, brainlets who don't have the mental strength to hack it. No ones fault but their own.

[Anonymous No.3986229]

>>3985793
Wait, this is it. If we let a majority of women join crypto we'll be able to make big BIG money off of them. Ez.

[Anonymous No.3986235]

>>3985926
>crypto makes shopping faster than a visa debit/credit card

sure it does.

[Anonymous No.3986247]

>>3986235

[Anonymous No.3986248]

>>3986186
(you)

[Anonymous No.3986251]

>>3985930
That's a good imitation, 10/10.

[Anonymous No.3986265]

>>3985930
(you)

[Anonymous No.3986283]

I wish I could short them the way I shorted those iota KEKS

[Anonymous No.3986499]

>>3986194
On it

@cryptostacy

Meme war 2

This time we shill our alt coin bags instead if blumpf

[Anonymous No.3986526]

>>3986499
checked, godspeed anon. get those @'s in.

[Anonymous No.3986529]

>>3986153
Why would women buy crypto? When all the fiat currencies crash and men hold 84% of the new money, the governments will just intervene to reverse that.

[Anonymous No.3986538]

>>3986529
because it isnt men hold 50% of the money. Simple reasons for simple people.

[Anonymous No.3986555]

>>3986221
And similar to the way women can shop at a sperm bank, men will simply shop for the eggs that women will NEED to part with due to lack of financial support from their male counterpart.

[Anonymous No.3986569]

>>3986222 looks like you’ve got your ducks in a row

[Anonymous No.3986644]

>>3986555

You realise they can just bypass us entirely and make their own babies. Artificial womb tech and sex dolls is the end of men not the roasties. The only way we can bypass that is to kill them and enslave them. Unfortunately, they will bribe the militaries with pussy. All this will be orchestrated by shadow governments of men you understand. It will be communism 2.0 but with secret societies of men at the top which nobody knows about except the very tops of the matriarchal society. Shit happens. Gonna make me some Lambo money and enjoy myself, fuck what happens in 50 years time as I will be dead. The roasties will be willing participants in the destruction of humanity with lack of genetic diversity and innovation in science and tech (they have no rational thinking generally or ability to conceptualize about realistic science. They are only proficient creatively and socially 90% of the time with some outliers) but that is their problem. They will Reeeeee for a communist world where we are all united. Either they get it and we are doomed or they don't get it outside the west and the rest of the worlds men come and rape them to death and we are back to the stone age.

Do not get chipped, beware china.

[Anonymous No.3986661]

>>3985793
Look at that pay gap! You all need to give your money to females and redistribute. We all know it's not because of personal choice that women don't get into crypto. It's the patriarchy obviously...

[Anonymous No.3986673]

>>3985799
>Predominantly 20-40yo white males

What is China, Korea, Japan, pajeets, Venezuela, Zimbabwe

[Anonymous No.3986697]

>>3986644
KEK

[Anonymous No.3986726]

Sexual dimorphism (which is real and studied) shows that men are more prone to taking risks than women
that's why women are touted as better drivers
and why men are more likely to get injured

the answers to "why are there more men in ____" are only a google search away

[Anonymous No.3986846]

There is nothing preventing women from investing in crypto except themselves. Very embarrassing for companies that don’t realize they’re undermining the women who took the initiative to make informed decisions and invest. Playing victim cards is spineless and dirty.

[Anonymous No.3986853]

>>3985793
>cucks angry women arent using all the bitcoin to spend it all immediately on makeup and shoes

[Anonymous No.3986875]

>>3986726
>the women are better drivers meme
only in your head, roastie

[Anonymous No.3986885]

>>3985930

[Anonymous No.3986900]

women are risk averse, and for good reason.
can you imagine how a woman would act after losing 90% in crypto?

[Anonymous No.3986912]

>>3985833
lol

[Anonymous No.3986936]

>>3986726
women are better at anything than men you retard fuck. best cooks? men. best educators? men. men invented education btw retard and everything that goes into it. best hair stylist? men. there's nothing in this world women can do better than men. everything women use it made by men

[Anonymous No.3986957]

>>3985793
let them buy my bags

[Anonymous No.3986964]

>>3985812
>Buying speculative shitcoins
>Economics

[Anonymous No.3987035]

>>3986875
I said they're touted as better drivers
and in this instance, 'better' means less accidents

if you want to say that 'better' means who can do a faster lap then it would be men, for the reasons i've stated

[Anonymous No.3987056]

>>3985826
Marketing teams looking to break into new/under-engaged demographics, primarily

[Anonymous No.3987079]

>>3986697

Now go and tell the MSM or anybody in politics or Academia that MRAs have valid points and women have more disadvantages than men in society other than their biological limitations that they are born with. See who is really winning that war. Smarts>being a sociopathic child who crys to get what they want REEEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.3987092]

>>3985837
no, you shitlord. all white males must pay 60% of their crypto to women and minorities as reparations

[Anonymous No.3987141]

(LESS GUYS)

[Anonymous No.3987222]

>>3986127
>inb4 women lose it all and demand the government "fixes" crypto and reimburses them for the money they lost by taxing successful investors

This is what's going to happen.

[Anonymous No.3987280]

>>3987035
Women are fucking terrible drivers. Despite driving less, they get into more accidents. This is caused by a variety of reasons but mainly because female brains aren't developed for making quick decisions in real-time applications.

https://www.malmanlaw.com/Malman-Law-Injury-Blog/who-causes-more-car-accidents-men-or-women/

[Anonymous No.3987409]

>>3986644
You realise they can just bypass us entirely and make their own babies.
Kinda like incest? Even without eggs, similar tech is in development that'll see eggs cultivated from skin cells.

You've missed the point however. Women make the final choice as to who gets to reproduce. Your notion of "well women can do it to" is quasi-cucked and laughable. Why the hell would they need/want to?

The focus will be on how the resulting paradigm shift will play out; if men see it to fruition of course:^)

>Unfortunately, they will bribe the militaries with pussy.
>matriarchal society.
>the rest of the worlds men come and rape them to death and we are back to the stone age.
Which is it?

[Anonymous No.3987592]

>>3987409

If the tech came in to make one sex obsolete they would need to. When AI gets in they will eradicate us all for clones to maintain their systems anyway.

Depends which road they take, they can't go back and try bribing non-existant militaries if they politicise them out of existence first hoping the rest of the world will follow. If they chose not to then they will rule with a pussy-whipped military if they chose not to then they will be overrun by kebabs. If they chose to use the military for fighting foreign wars instead of just keeping the remnants of beta men in cheque then they will get overrun by the bug people easily. If they chose the remove war and hope the non-west follows they get overrun too. Their only hope is a combined effort internationally. They will never agree on the best methods of subjugating the men, they will end up being at war with each other before too long and end up in the same situation they wanted to get rid of men for in the first place.

[Anonymous No.3987701]

>>3985826
Some people believe women must share the same interests as men.

[Anonymous No.3987717]

>>3985826
Jews

[Anonymous No.3987791]

>>3985996
Is this bait or are you actually this stupid? Women are statistically less inclined to take risks. That is not mutually exclusive with being able to achieve virtually anything a man can. Risk aversion is neither an inherently good or a bad thing, it's just a fact. If women want to participate in speculative "investing" like us then great, more power to them! But acknowledging that they are less likely to is not sexism. There is no silent hand of the patriarchy preventing women from participating in crypto, there is only a lack of interest from most women. But like anything there are exceptions—my female coworker is the biggest crypto fan I've met.

[Anonymous No.3987795]

>>3985851
yeah and it's a super annoying ploy. Probably some feminist intern working at the myetherwallet office.

[Anonymous No.3987807]

>>3985837
This.

Let's face it. Women are biologically prone towards being against risk taking compared to their male counterparts. Almost all videos on YouTube of people doing absolutely stupid shit is of men. You'd he hard-pressed to find endless videos of women jumping of bridges and cliffs and making a cake out of hair and so on.

Whats even funnier is the left says it's because men oppress women that there are no women in STEM, but it looks more like it's because women are women that they aren't going in. Crypto is completely anonymous yet 16% of people in this shitcoin are women (A large percentage of which are likely lesbians, not that there's anything wrong with that).

[Anonymous No.3987846]

>>3985793
>women literally just not participating in something that is open to anybody
>must be discrimination
All my fucking what. If you want more women to hold crypto there needs to be women who actually want to hold crypto.
The reason for inequality in this space is women’s refusal to participate.

[Anonymous No.3987855]

>>3987807
>completely anonymous
>they know the M/F ratios.

Makes sense. Women BTFO by a marketing ploy yet again.

[Anonymous No.3987902]

>>3985799

This is extremely bad marketing for them.

[Anonymous No.3987917]

>>3987807
>>3987855

PLUS men BTFO by sharing and putting MyEtheriumWallet pictures into many threads and forums. MSM have been using the sexism shit to get likes, shares, and clicks for years now. It is shock jock journalism and the consequences on society be damned. Sex sells, even arguing about it. The problem is that it is morally bankrupting a generation as they obsess about its every detail while the media and advertising companies rake in the cash. It is literally fake news. It is so effective people are forming tribal cults over it. It is just advertising!

That is what is really going on here.

[Anonymous No.3987945]

>>3985793
WHERE ARE THE GENDER-FLUID PEOPLE? YOU FUCKING CISGENDER PIECE OF SHIT, DID YOU JUST ASSUME THAT ALL THE PEOPLE ARE GENDER BINARY? YOU STINKING PILE OF CRAP

[Anonymous No.3987959]

>>3987902

Why? It will get thousands sharing it to moan about it. For many, it will be a forgotten issue but the company will stick in peoples minds even subconsciously.
>Oh I need a wallet.
>Oh there was that one company I head about... I can't remember where from though.
Some will just use the company regardless, because it is the only one they know, or because they agree with the message.

>>3987917

On the plus side, it is a good sign that they see a market for wallets and that the crypto market is expecting increased usage. Good news for us early adopters. It is probably also why BTC has been in the news a lot lately other than its massive spike.

[Anonymous No.3987976]

>>3985793
btw in all seriousness do you faggots realize how much money we could make if more women were into crypto? women can't think for shit, their decision making process is driven by emotions, shilling them a couple of shitcoins would be easy AF

tl;dr:
P R O F I T
R
O
F
I
T

[Anonymous No.3988018]

>>3987959

>It will get thousands sharing it to moan about it

Worked out well for Colon Copperdick and the NFL amirite?

[Anonymous No.3988027]

>>3985793
clearly the patriarchy forced women not to give a fuck about technology and socially un-sanctioned fringe industries!

the world is gay. let women be women. no need to shame them for not liking fucking computers.

[Anonymous No.3988055]

>>3987976
A lot of women simply don't buy. They give up too easily. Women simply won't buy, whether it's a good or bad investment. Women genuinely prefer to keep money in cash and seek out the most boring, risk-averse investments possible, fucking always. It's men who utilize calculated risks.

It would be way way fucking harder than you understand to get women into crypto.

[Anonymous No.3988058]

>>3985846
>millenial women make 8% more than millenial men
>men still have more money

and its all millenial men in crypto.

[Anonymous No.3988072]

>>3987976
Don't spout the nupol nonsense. Women hate risks and are very unlikely to be high rollers. Just read about all the stories of /biz/tards getting emasculated by their wife when they want to gamble on shitcoins for exemple.
The moment they see a red candle, they out.

[Anonymous No.3988073]

>>3985889
women don't partake in movements until they are mainstream and socially sanctioned. women are literally herd animals who just go along with the group.

[Anonymous No.3988084]

>>3985793
There's absolutely fucking nothing stooping women from investing in crypto

[Anonymous No.3988093]

>>3988072
>women are less likely to gamble
women don't even know what the fuck crypto is in the first place, let alone gambling on it. 90% of women have no interest in hanging out on message boards trading ideas about technology.

[Anonymous No.3988126]

>>3988084
>>3988093
I'm telling you guys here: >>3988055
Women are extremely risk-averse with their finances. They like cash, even though it's guaranteed to lose value over time. MEN are the one who calculate risk and make investments.

[Anonymous No.3988135]

>>3988126
Also if you get women into crypto, they will start dumping and create a panic the second Bitcoin falls over 2%.

[Anonymous No.3988166]

>>3985930
Oh thank God another intellectual. I was beginning to think that I was the only one here. I agree their are too many straight white males making money on crypto. Obviously crypto currency is racist, homophobic and worse of all anti semetic. Deflationary currency based off proof of work first started in nazi Germany. Bitcoin is literally nazi money.

[Anonymous No.3988218]

>>3988126
I'm telling you here >>3988093
that women have no interest in technology, by and large. this is not something they would have heard of until long after it became mainstream.

[Anonymous No.3988226]

lmao that Ruth was on stefan molyneux and got alpha mogged

[Anonymous No.3988239]

>>3988218
con't
so of course women aren't into it. the primary reason for few women in crypto is because they're busy getting railed and going on dates to give a flying fuck about crypto currency technology.
risk aversion is a distant second when it comes to the reason who few women are involved.

[Anonymous No.3988276]

>>3987592
>If the tech came in to make one sex obsolete they would need to.
These technological advancements won't render either/or sex obsolete though. As long as men/women still derive sexual gratification from the other, and they can reproduce, these advancements, however progressive or regressive, are just a substitute wherein either gender isn't afforded the same sexual/reproductive privileges as others by the opposing sex.

Without going too far into how this will all play out in the west's domestic/foreign policy, the main take-away is that the average man will no longer be required to compete for more and more resources just to achieve a baseline level of fulfilment. Whether that's a positive thing is for another conversation, probably not. But women won't be in a position to use sex/reproduction as a vice to coerce men for too much longer.

Ideally, men's judgement will no longer be clouded and subjugated by pussy; returning us back to a more pragmatic approach in dealing with each other kek.

[Anonymous No.3988282]

>>3986186
this is some high level shit posting.

[Anonymous No.3988305]

>>3985793
Jesus, the comments are cancer.

This is how we know the normies have arrived. When crypto is polluted with sjw bullshit.

[Anonymous No.3988322]

>>3986186

[Anonymous No.3988385]

>>3985793
Why is it so wrong to admit that biological differences between men and women can also express themselves in the form of gender-dominated interests and hobbies? I have tried quite hard to get my female friends and family interested in crypto(as well as male, ofc). The girls just don't give a shit. They realize that there are complex concepts involved. and instead of asking questions like males tend to do, they just turn away from it. It's too complicated to even bother learning more about, apparently. I realize that this does not apply to 100% of females, but the trends are so strong that I don't believe it to be purely a coincidence. Most girls just don't give a fuck about high-tech internet money.

[Anonymous No.3988397]

>>3988018

That wasn't advertising though. That was racist activism by the players. Advertising is provocative enough but has boundaries. They found one of them with that.

>>3988322

No pom on this board man come on... Sigh, Unzips.

[Anonymous No.3988450]

I commented on their Twitter and they actually blocked me.

Looks like mew is now in the same pool as iota. Cue the memes...

[Anonymous No.3988465]

>>3988018

They go by the numbers don't forget. Not because of activism. they go slowly increasing the outrage level of a campaign until they see the numbers drop and then they go back a bit and sit around that ideal level testing slightly +/- Provocation level campaigns until the numbers change. It is a science. The human brain is easy to manipulate.

[Anonymous No.3988549]

>>3985837
Because this ideology is not about equality, it's about redistributing wealth from the strong to the weak. Actual equality does the opposite, and that's not what the marxist types are looking for. What equality really means to them is "you need to feel guilty for having more and you need to give it away".

[Anonymous No.3988557]

>>3985793
>Women start buying eth en-masse
>ETH crashes to 200 sats each

[Anonymous No.3988613]

>>3988397
I can't fap roasties but if you can, more power to you

[Anonymous No.3988648]

>>3988397
This is not porn, it is a sandwich that I really, really want to lick.

[Anonymous No.3988660]

I love women. I hate what they have become.

[Anonymous No.3988765]

>>3986222
As a woman in STEM this is true. When interviewing for technical positions, I have an advantage because they want to diversify their team so the company looks good on paper. Companies are always doing diversity surveys these days.

[Anonymous No.3988766]

>>3985799


for fucks sake they won't stop till they infect every last thing on this planet. it's insane. they can't just let us neets have our crypto and shit coins, they should just say what they really mean and that is kill whitey

[Anonymous No.3988820]

>>3988660

Like a toddler, they will tire themselves out crying eventually. Just ignore their cries, never apologise, and stand your ground based on reality.

[Anonymous No.3988990]

>>3985793
Fuck these faggots. I'm BOYcotting MEW.

[Anonymous No.3989204]

>>3985930
>>3986078
https://www.seratio-coins.world/

[Anonymous No.3989513]

>>3985793
>more dumb money is a bad thing
lol fucking imbecile

[Anonymous No.3989551]

Test

[Anonymous No.3990683]

>>3989551
It worked. You are now an official member of 4chan. Please collect your complimentary autism and fist yourself.

[Anonymous No.3990850]

>>3985930

[Anonymous No.3990904]

>>3986133
>muh sex dolls
you know how hard it is to clean one of those bitches?

[Anonymous No.3990925]

>>3985793
wow yeah op i am totally opposed to having a bunch of dumb slags in crypto that i can scam, yes that truly would be awful

[Anonymous No.3990930]

>>3985799
dropped and sold all my singular

they can keep their women

[Anonymous No.3991006]

>>3985793
im fucking sick of these niggers ruining everything fuck all these resentful cocksuckers

[Anonymous No.3991039]

>>3985793
Great news desu. When crypto becomes more Normified that means we'll be able to make a very quick buck flipping retarded coins/projects run by SJWs which will see early popularity for political reasons before collapsing due to total incompetence and the inevitable political backstabbing while continuing to enjoy gains on steadier projects run my FUCKING WHITE (and ASIAN) MALES.

[Anonymous No.3991041]

>>3985793
>Females get in
>Inherently emotional and impatient
>Predictably fall for pump and dumps, cause large, predictable swings in price

Unironically please happen!

[Anonymous No.3991059]

>>3986964
Learn 2 game theory fucker, crypto isn't macro econ but it def is micro

[Anonymous No.3991077]

On one hand women spend money so they’ll bring in new cash flow.

On the other hand, women ruin everything. So yeah, they’re going to ruin crypto. Stay out.

[Anonymous No.3991149]

>>3985793
At least the PC police have not pushed niggers in yet. Imagine the industry crumble then.

[Anonymous No.3991175]

>>3991077
Women = bitching and moaning whenever they can't have their way = impending communist-tier regulation

[Anonymous No.3991194]

>>3991175
This, they'll add nothing but regulatory pressure as they are too risk adverse to pump much money in.

[Anonymous No.3991220]

im actually shocked that its not 96% males
what kind of woman have patience to watch graphs all day

[Anonymous No.3991246]

>>3991220
Most people in crypto aren't NEETS that stare at charts all day, they buy a couple things they have faith in and rarely make trades.

[Anonymous No.3991259]

>>3985793
Wow im surprised its 16%.

[Anonymous No.3991286]

>>3985808
Spbp

[Anonymous No.3991348]

>>3985793

>there are people on this earth that will look at this graph and be convinced that there is some kind of conspiracy to keep wimminz out of crypto

[Anonymous No.3991367]

>>3985930

[Anonymous No.3991372]

>>3988766

> he thought he would EVER be free from the feminazi inquisition

oy vey you silly boyim

[Anonymous No.3991381]

>>3985930

[Anonymous No.3991387]

>>3989204

> bongcoin
> just install this simple CCTV camera on your smartphone today!

[Anonymous No.3991403]

>>3985930

[Anonymous No.3991462]

>>3985826
exactly, i do not care if you're transphobic dogs and cats are pooling their pet store funds to purchase coins. let them. more for me. but who cares what the demographic is? interestingly, since males are still the prominent decision makers pertaining to family fund investment there will probably continue to be a "disproportionate" amount of M:F ratio of coin purchasers.

god save us all; that was a dumb fucking post.

[Anonymous No.3991513]

>>3985793
What the fuck? Is that real??? What the fuck ????????????????????????????????????????????????????\\\\\

WHAT THE FUCK

[Anonymous No.3992381]

> Ruth (((Heasman))) in the comments

Every fucking time

[Anonymous No.3992410]

yes more women in crypto pls
i want to take their money

>16%
thats still way more than i thought there would have been. literally 3 out of every 20 wallet holders are a chick.

[Anonymous No.3992433]

>>3985799

More emotionally driven investors! Sure bring them right in. I accept cat lady money too.

[Anonymous No.3992441]

>>3985793
Are they going to force women to invest?

[Anonymous No.3993209]

>>3987807
>a large percentage of which are lesbians
Lesbian here, not holding this shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.3993325]

84% men and 16% men buying crypto with their wives/girlfriends ID

[Anonymous No.3993330]

>>3993325
ey, youre probably right
could also be criminals using false identities

[Anonymous No.3993345]

>>3985812

[Anonymous No.3993395]

>>3993345
I would not fuck with this guy.

[Anonymous No.3993676]

I'm a grill into crypto ask me anything :^)

[Anonymous No.3993844]

For anybody who didn't know and keeps losing money on big spikes.

>Pump and Dump - Explained
>>3993493