[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 164 KB, 1080x1349, 1507457600103.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3936472 No.3936472 [Reply] [Original]

is chainlink a good investment now?

No fudding or shilling just real facts

>> No.3936488

Price is pretty low right now, potential is really high.
Based on these facts, yes.

>> No.3936498

>>3936472
Fuck facts.

>> No.3936511

>>3936472
No, but DGB is...told you all 30mins ago...check it fast......270 stats is 1st target

>> No.3936535

It's being FUDded to oblivion so yeah, it's a good time to buy

>> No.3936542

>>3936511
>unironically shilling dgb

>> No.3936555

Yeah its a good buy just don';t come crying if it hasn't moved in a week theres a good chance it could just trade sideways/ down for a while now until something is announced but the minute that announcement does come its an instant +50%

>> No.3936570

its definetly the time to buy anything under 8000 satoshi is ultra cheap, buy when others are fearful

>> No.3936578

Not until we move away from binance

This will die hard if we dont get on a new exchange

>> No.3936586

>>3936472

winners don't let facts get in the way of being rich

>> No.3936646
File: 33 KB, 363x349, le ugly fuck.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3936646

>>3936472
no stay away from it, its not a good time to buy.

>hype already dead
>dev team isn't getting their project running (conference was a big disaster)
>apparently they were too close to the bathroom and people couldn't hear Sergay speak through the Gloryhole while the toilets loudly flush
>SWIFT and friends are already pulling out of the project (they removed all marks about smartcontract from their site and news (just check their site, its true)
>there was already a new solution found for the oracle problem that does not involve an incomplete project like LINK (hint: big ass computers)
>dev team also does not communicate with investors because too ashamed and autism to tell them all that the 32mn from the ICO are all wasted
>they have trouble finding more devs and the project can't be scaled up

etc.

if you buy now you're a deluded retard, if you have not sold already you're even dumber.

>> No.3936847

>>3936646
>>SWIFT and friends are already pulling out of the project (they removed all marks about smartcontract from their site and news (just check their site, its true)

Why do people keep posting this shit FUD. Can anyone refute it.

>> No.3936855

COSS is planning to list LINK soon. Small exchange but the more the merrier I guess

>> No.3936864

>>3936847
It ain‘t FUD if its the truth, go and check the SWIFT website, they removed everything that mentions smartcontracts or LINK.

>> No.3936874

>>3936472
Fool.

Buy high sell low, not buy low sell high!

>> No.3936875

>>3936864

Was it even mentioned beforehand?

Wouldn't it only be up there as a SIBOS advertisement. Chainlink was already shown why would it still need to be there?

>> No.3936905

>>3936875
>Was it even mentioned beforehand?
Apparently it was, and now its gone.
No news about it, they don‘t mention anything about it and cut it all out.
So much for „close partnership with SWIFT“.
Like your girlfriend is deleting you out of pictures, the same principle here.
The partnership is most likely over, probably in favor of other, cheaper solutions.

>> No.3936938
File: 70 KB, 600x631, DECTrstUQAA1c7w.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3936938

>>3936864
Dafuq? SWIFT website never even had anything about LINK.

Coindesk was the first to write an article about a partnership. Sergey being on SIBOS made it more clear, but still not 100%. And now just yesterday Sergey said on slack that they are indeed working together with SWIFT.

This is typical FUD here in this thread. Don't fall for it, but don't go all in on LINK either.

>> No.3936961

>>3936938
>truths and facts I don‘t like are FUD

dude cmon, why you so deluded?

>> No.3936980

currently below ICO price, i would say a great buy!

>> No.3936984

>>3936961
You didn't even try to refute what I said, just an ad hominem.
Makes me happy, seeing FUDDERS getting this desperate. :D

>> No.3937000
File: 5 KB, 267x188, 4CFED7B5-DF45-43F9-8043-FF8B98FA476C.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3937000

>>3936984
>33 cent and freefalling
>“uh oh its i-its FUD!!!“