/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.3894397]

You wanna fuck with me? Huh? Who the fuck do you think you're talking to? How about I FUD your overpriced scam back to the stone age. Would you like that you pathetic piece of shit? Let me get out a list of all the companies that YCombinator has that have failed, never made it, crashed to zero... it's like 97% of them. Think your scam coin is any different? Do we really need yet another payments clone? No. We don't. They are already far far behind. This ain't fucking stripe lol. YCombinator is desperately trying to play catchup. Y Combinator wishes they were still relevant in our world. But they are a dinosaur in the crypto game. Look at the Brave browser with VC funding... crashing and burning. That's because it's a shitty useless clone, just like Req.Net.

Have fun dropping your bags at half the ICO price. No one wants your stupid scam ICO bullshit anymore. Look at enigma. Wow, it sold out in like 2 minutes. Gonna go 10x right? Right? Muh MIT. Muh hedge funds for crypto. That was actually a revolutionary idea... and yet... It's trading on a major exchange at well bellow ICO price. The same is true for your shitty Request.To.Die bags.

So please.

I REQUEST that you fucking go fuck yourself.

LINK is the future motherfucker. Link will be $500 by Q1 of 2018

Cap this.

[Anonymous No.3894432]

>>3894397
Req is gonna use LINK.
I put 100 eth in the presale for CL and 100 eth in Request. Both projects have their strengths and weaknesses. Dumb to be so emotionally invested in only one coin.

[Anonymous No.3894455]

[Anonymous No.3894462]

>>3894432
came here to reply this actually. request is gonna use LINK, everyone bullish in link should be bullish in req too. quantstamp is another one if youre interested, has relations with both link and req. they audited req supposedly, and one of their advisors advised on link too, stating link and quantstamp as most promising tech recently

[Anonymous No.3894475]

>>3894397
fag if OP

but yeah, balls deep man

[Anonymous No.3894478]

>>3894397
Funny you expect Enigma to be 108232x by now. I suggest you scoop up em at this price while you can.

[Anonymous No.3894511]

>>3894397
What I don't understand is the amount of FUD and FOMO when this coin has held stable at ~$.40 for the last three weeks.

This board needs more general threads to clean it up. Link is being spammed at this point.

JANITORS PLEASE DO IT FOR FREE

[Anonymous No.3894526]

>>3894455
fixed the lock's proportions

[Anonymous No.3894543]

>>3894462
im bullish on REQ but that logic is shaky.

since REQ is using LINK you should be bullish on link if you're bullish on REQ.

but it does not hold the other way around. LINK will not be using REQ so its possible to be bullish on LINK and not on REQ.

[Anonymous No.3894548]

>>3894462
Also Tierion (TNT) is tied to Microsoft and guess who is tied into Tierion? Hint...Scroll down

https://www.smartcontract.com/link-copy-4

[Anonymous No.3894572]

Market is still baby i expect a billion dollar market cap by December

[Anonymous No.3894575]

>>3894543
yep youre right i fucked up the explanation, my point was more that association with each other should make you bullish on both although typing it out right now seems flimsy. yours sounds much better

[Anonymous No.3894592]

>>3894526
Damn it I was looking for this image.
I used a worse version.

[Anonymous No.3894636]

>>3894548
Yeah, dude, no logic was used here.

hurr durr put tierion on the website, it was obviously just a placeholder for the design

[Anonymous No.3894762]

>>3894592
>not following my chainlink logo github

[Anonymous No.3894769]

>>3894511
This is req fud and link shilling. Reread the OP

[Anonymous No.3894778]

>>3894762
link pls

[Anonymous No.3894795]

>>3894778
I was kidding

[Anonymous No.3894823]

>>3894397

>>>>op's bitch post

muh 4chan fud faggots