BTC MOONING RIGHT NOW

[Anonymous No.3197888]

get in for comfy gains

[Anonymous No.3197894]

+0.5%
Yawn

[Anonymous No.3197942]

HAPPENING

[Anonymous No.3198210]

This is it lad...the takeoff to 5000 USD

[Anonymous No.3198250]

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

[Anonymous No.3198263]

>>3197888
i love it when it moons but at the same time it scares me that it's gonna dip just as fast at the weekend.

[Anonymous No.3198280]

this is bitcoins last hurrah. itll never break $4500. there's nothing fueling this pump but pure speculation. no one will use lightning. bch will forever fuck with the hash rate. there is a lawsuit in progress over segwit2x.

the idea that bitcoin will rise forever because of a limited supply, regardless of anything else, is beyond insane.

[Anonymous No.3198289]

>>3198280
>bitcoin is finished, says increasinly desperate mETHead

[Anonymous No.3198303]

>>3198280
b. cashcuck

[Anonymous No.3198305]

>>3198280
Look at our current financial system.

Bitcoin is not the most insane thing on earth.

[Anonymous No.3198359]

>>3198289
we will see. i didn't even expect this last pump because of how terrible the fundamentals and technicals are, so i could be wrong about about $4500. if it does hit $4500, ill admit defeat and say you bitcoin maximalists were right.

still, the tech behind it is shit. can we agree on that? $5 fees and hour long transactions fucking suck.

[Anonymous No.3198388]

>>3198359
at this point everyone is just speculation that it will be solved with the lightning network

high fees and long confirmation times are shit, agreed

[Anonymous No.3198396]

Selling pos eth here for one whole superior bbc

[Anonymous No.3198418]

>>3198289

Eth is going up every time btc goes up, its the chinese shills that talk shit about btc...

[Anonymous No.3198421]

>>3198359
DGB has great tech and blazing fast transactions, you should try investing in that

[Anonymous No.3198473]

>>3198388
thats the thing though. i dont think lightning will solve the issue. i 100% feel the block size limit exists to force lightning, and that r/bitcoins censorship was a major factor in its adoption.

i feel people will just use alts that are faster, especially after eth eventually flips btc and btc becomes "the legacy chain."

[Anonymous No.3198500]

The whole BCC vs BTC debate is retarded.

BTC is too established to fail and get replaced by another coin.

[Anonymous No.3198520]

>>3198500
Yeah, it's like IBM getting replaced by Apple or Compaq. I mean sure Compaq had greater tech than IBM at one point but were they going to replace IBM? lmao dude no

[Anonymous No.3198533]

furthermore, bch is actually a threat. its trash as an investment (ltc already exists, so bch is redundant as a bitcoin 2.0 attempt) and i feel it was created specifically as an attack against btc. but, as an attack, the math checks out. it will attack btc every week forever and just needs to succeed once to kill it.

[Anonymous No.3198560]

>>3198520
but IBM never got replaced by apple or compaq.

IBM sold their PC section off to lenovo which still exists.

[Anonymous No.3198575]

Guys, do you have links to any academic articles where it is said that BTC demand is more speculative than anything? I tried to google but I didn't find anything.

[Anonymous No.3198619]

>>3198575
would you hold bitcoin if it would never rise? all coins are mostly speculation right now.

[Anonymous No.3198664]

What the fuck is fuelling this? Just sudden rise starting @ 18:00 est..

[Anonymous No.3198669]

>>3198280
Segwit 2x will be another drop of free money (or BTC will become the free money, depends on which chain wins)

Regardless the Core devs are so rigid they're ruining their own coin

[Anonymous No.3198768]

>>3198619
I agree with you completely. But I have a decently sized assigned that I have to show in september and I only need one or two articles that openly mention this. Could it be that no one mentions it because it is obvious?

[Anonymous No.3198851]

Praying it goes back to around 4100, think it could happen soon?

[Anonymous No.3199191]

we are going to test $4500
very soon combined value BTC+BCH will be over $5000

[Anonymous No.3199203]

[Anonymous No.3199231]

Sold for 4479 USD on Quadriga. Why is there a premium on there? Because it's a Canadian exchange?

[Anonymous No.3199345]

>>3198533
From a technical standpoint, what is a better form of electronic cash, LTC or BCH? This is the long term fundamental question. Which coin processes transactions fastest and cheapest.

In the long term if I can use BTC + Lightning Network + Litecoin to pay for anything efficiently, BCH should eventually die.

The BCH price you see isn't real btw. Many people still aren't able to sell their coins.

[Anonymous No.3199540]

>>3199345
lightning will never be used. people will just use alts instead.

from a tech perspective only eth matters. eth has billions invested into it and no other coin comes close in terms of research and development.

[Anonymous No.3199567]

>>3199191
It already is.

[$4CHN:CWNWHZnzmEPNA3yGJUXDAy3J(...) No.3199598]

ETH is still the savior

[Anonymous No.3199642]

>>3199540
But isn't it more complicated to have several alts rather than a single coin, or just 2 coins, and use them in different layers of the system with the BTC backbone as a settlement layer?

[Anonymous No.3199833]

>>3199642
lightning will never see widespread adoption and you will still need to pay huge fees and wait ages to move coins to cold storage.

but lets pretend lightning is adopted and every exchange and shop uses it. lets also pretend bch isnt slowly killing the network.

lighting doesnt solve the problem of quadratic growth that bitcoin has. eventually opening and closing lightning channels will take weeks and have $100 fees. this eventuality is maybe 5 or 10 years into the future because of how bitcoin doesnt prune its ledger like eth does.

[Anonymous No.3200037]

>>3198280
I literally never read posts made by anime posters. You're are fucked in the head and your opinions and posts are worthless

[Anonymous No.3200291]

I know there's gotta be some smug bastards lurking here holding a fair amount of bitcoin thinking: "maybe I should cash some out now"

Take it from a bad goy who's been buying and mining since 2012, don't.

Greedy Jews and rich shabbos goys are going to be entering serious positions in Bitcoin real soon, and they'd love to buy the Bitcoin you own.

Don't give it to them. When you're willing to hold until Bitcoin is worth nothing, then maybe you have a considerable amount of Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.3200574]

>>3198533
>bch is redundant as a bitcoin 2.0
Unless bitcoin 1.0 is destroyed.

What service did bitcoin provide, that created the growth? Bitcoin was a currency I buy things with, without doing it through the bank. DIRECT PURCHASING. Not showing the seller a card through which they contract the bank to confirm, or depending on their printing press, interest rates and notFed noReserves. The blockchain verified itself and everyone could see it.

Under LN there will be a private, third party ledger to act as a bank. And if you look into LN and the new BTC conglomerate, they're funded surreptitiously by bankers.

This is what the BCC "shills" mean when they say bitcoin's being centralized. They're right.

And bitcoin's value comes from the ability to make decentralized transactions with it. BCC still does that, but BTC is using banks.

[Anonymous No.3200602]

>>3198280

[Anonymous No.3200674]

>>3198280
>tfw he doesn't know about the tulips.

[Anonymous No.3200695]

>>3200602
>none of the blockstream shills will respond to this: >>3200574