Rubic limit orders do work

[Anonymous No.30419834]

Tx hash 0x54435465363906ebb1587833d283a58498ac52a887b5bf3a8ed3c9fd5957dfbb
Platform fee was set at 0.01 at first and testing purposes.
Good night
My Rubic stays cubic

[Anonymous No.30419882]

>>30419834
delete this
you have 2 minutes

[Anonymous No.30419932]

>>30419834
Jannies deleting this thread in 1... 2..

[Anonymous No.30419940]

[Anonymous No.30419991]

>>30419834
STOP POSTING THIS YOU FAGGOT WHEN I FIND OUT WHICH ONE OF YOU IS DOING THIS I'M GONNA BAN YOU FROM THE MCDC ELITE

[Anonymous No.30420024]

>>30419834
Fucking Kek, fudders btfo... I mean.. Fuck that's not my script... RUBIC LIMIT ORDERS DO NOT OWRK AUTIST PROVED WRONG THREAD HERE (thrdlonk)

[Anonymous No.30420039]

>>30419834
>2 days 11 hours ago
now post one thats not from their internal testing OP

[Anonymous No.30420105]

You mean that random retard screaming all day was wrong?
And rubic isn't a scam?
Again?
How can every fud be wrong for months?
Wow I can't contain my shock.

[Anonymous No.30420117]

>>30420039
You still haven't paid that one anon his eth for going through with a transaction and showing it you fucking pratel shitinstreet.

[Anonymous No.30420188]

>>30420117
i'm not that other guy you fucking retard. just waiting for actual proof of limit orders executing like limit orders should, i.e. not only at the exact price

[Anonymous No.30420290]

>>30420188
Then you acknowledge you are full of shit and it works?

[Anonymous No.30420317]

>>30420188
hey chiang

[Anonymous No.30420342]

>>30420290
if it does, how come nobody has been able to provide proof for two fucking days

[Anonymous No.30420419]

>>30420105
More like he's right and Sanjeev is shuffling around pulling his hair out wondering how to get whitey to buy back in.

Do the needful, his village needs feeding.

[Anonymous No.30420715]

>>30420342
>>30420117
You didn't deny that the anon who showed his transaction was legit. That was your proof and when asked to pay up you ducked and ran.

[Anonymous No.30420763]

>>30420715
Kek these fudders are retarded... You already know what their next move is. "okay you showed me a working one, but now spoonfeed me more"

[Anonymous No.30421135]

a test transaction? really? nothing from a real user? nice damage control attempt makes me thinkg

[Anonymous No.30421180]

>>30419834
incoming fudding fag that makes 50 posts in a thread

[Anonymous No.30421200]

>>30420715
Well, I don’t really care about your pissing contest. For me the question is whether to invest, and currently I remain unconvinced that the limit order feature works, and if the posted tx is from testnet that just makes me even more skeptical.

[Anonymous No.30421284]

>>30421200
then don't invest faggot, why don't you wait. literally no one cares if you invest, your measly little 0.01 ETH will not affect the success of rubic. Literally DYOR and come to your senses or fuck off. You can buy in at $2 when we have L2 implemented, DOT integration, and all the other shit planned for the next month or two.

[Anonymous No.30421350]

>>30421200
Furthermore, the fact that we’re not drowning in anons showing their examples of successful limit orders tells me that even if it works it’s apparently not the popular feature I expected it to be so not worth investing in. Similarly, the lack of anons reporting unsuccessful attempts tell me it’s not popular.

[Anonymous No.30421375]

>>30421284
I'll be honest, I was a baholder, bought in early, but the bull run won't last long enough for Q3-4. It might not even last to end of Q2. If they don't deliver quickly, it's not going to matter if the sun shines out of their asses.

[Anonymous No.30421416]

>>30417554
let's all laugh at this KEK, WHAT A FAGGOT

[Anonymous No.30421515]

>>30421313
rubicbros...

[Anonymous No.30421549]

>>30421416
30410723
this one

[Anonymous No.30421576]

>>30421284
lol fuck off you pathetic shill. The whole point of all these threads is to get anons to invest. That’s why this is all heatedly debated, it’s between anons (shills) hoping to attract investment vs anons (shills) hoping to detract investment, us investors watch you fight it out and position ourselves according to results. Let me just tell you, bud, that from the onlooking investors’ view, your side is flailing very badly and you in particular are a laughing stock.

[Anonymous No.30421713]

>>30416188
>>30421104
>>30414533
Look at this shit, faggots were even shilling MCDC in RBC threads at one point.

[Anonymous No.30421841]

>>30421576
>>30421350
>>30421200
>LE NOOTRAL OBSERVER ACT
What shitcoin are your buddies going to shill when they come barging in here? Bonus points for blatant rugpulls or competing DEXES.

[Anonymous No.30421843]

>>30421200
congratulations believing the tranny fud ngmi

[Anonymous No.30421899]

>>30421515
FUCKING HEAD SHOT
Rubic confirmed scam

[Anonymous No.30421903]

I posted this in another thread just now but I went through telegram and they are actively posting orders which work via limits.

I think a competitor to rubic might be trying to kill them off

[Anonymous No.30421970]

>>30421903
good for rubic, but toolio is a fucking fag that blocks everyone

[Anonymous No.30421973]

>>30421903
can you post the actual addresses instead of a screenshot, please? or both

[Anonymous No.30422046]

>>30421973
0x54435465363906ebb1587833d283a58498ac52a887b5bf3a8ed3c9fd5957dfbb

[Anonymous No.30422053]

>>30421973
I'm on my phone at work. Just go to the telegram and scroll through

[Anonymous No.30422082]

>>30422046
No, not the one that's been spammed. I want one that a user has done.

[Anonymous No.30422112]

>>30422046
This same order keeps getting posted in all the threads but it's clearly from their internal testing on Friday. Why are there none from anons on this board?

[Anonymous No.30422127]

>>30422082

[Anonymous No.30422216]

>>30422127
Posting a testnet transaction from almost 3 days ago is not "they are actively posting orders". I want orders, plural, and I want to see users that can't just do whatever they want because they're devs.

[Anonymous No.30422240]

>>30422216

[Anonymous No.30422336]

>>30422240
Whatever man. I guarantee I bought lower than you did. I'm tired of this shit.

[Anonymous No.30422360]

>>30422082
>>30422112
>Limit orders don't work, prove they do
>ok, here's the transaction
>NO NOT THAT ONE IT DOESN'T COUNT

[Anonymous No.30422463]

>>30421313
The goalposts have been extremely clear since day 1. There has still not been a single autofilled limit order since release. The feature is demonstrably fake, how the FUCK can any rubic holders defend the absolute BEST evidence the devs have being a transaction from

>before release
>with 1/15th the fees they say they have now
>executed from an address that has not made a single transaction since the feature was "released"

[Anonymous No.30422795]

>>30422216
Basically when you want to execute limit order right now you have to save 0.15 ETH + around 0.03 ETH for fees (platform + gas). There is no point doing it when buying low amounts. You can instant swap pretty hefty amount of RBC with the amount of platform fee + gas.
I looked at the order book on Rubic.exchange and cannot find any favorable orders that limit function could execute.

[Anonymous No.30422887]

>>30421841
None because I don't buy shitcoins let alone obvious pajeet pnds like rubic

[Anonymous No.30422931]

>>30422795
There have been many orders linked over the past few days that have fulfilled those conditions, why have they not executed?

[Anonymous No.30423085]

>>30422887
>New ID
OOF I wasn't talking to you.
Or was I?

[Anonymous No.30423373]

>>30421841
I’m not a shill, I’m an investor with >$1M in crypto, I was thinking of putting $100k into rubic but 3 things have made me reconsider: 1) the lies about limit orders 2) the lack of anybody really noticing until hero anon pointed it out (it’s apparently not a feature anyone wants to use anyway) and 3) the atrocious quality of pro-rubic shills - if you guys are the best the rubic team can afford, I don’t see much of a future for them.

[Anonymous No.30423391]

>>30422931
Just looked the "famous" 0.18 ETH per 1RBC transaction.
It couldn't be filled by limit function because - plat.fee (0.15 ETH) and swap fee (0.05 ETH) give a total cost of 0.2 ETH while the author of the order offered "only 0.18 ETH per RBC".
When he wanted to do it as a limit order where 1 RBC would cost 0.18 ETH he should have had offered 0.2+0.18 so total of 0.38 ETH for an exchange of 1 RBC.
Of course the swap fee can change fast so it's always wise to leave a bit more ETH to fill it, I usually leave 100-200USD worth of ETH for swap fees.

[Anonymous No.30423486]

>>30423373
post wallet and stop acting like you're an "investor" god from above

[Anonymous No.30423491]

>>30421843
> believing
I don’t believe shit without proof. At the moment it’s up to rubic to prove their feature works if they want me or anyone else to believe it does. Remember, they are not competing with hero anon claiming ghat it doesn’t, they are competing with the null hypothesis which also claims rubic’s limit orders don’t work until they have proven otherwise.

[Anonymous No.30423561]

>>30421903
So a limit order is supposed to be on the book, right? It’s what market orders eat from. Thus a limit order is something very different from a market order that gets triggered at a certain price, something which is more commonly known as a stop loss order (a stop loss sell or buy order is not a limit order visible on the books, it is a computer program running on the side, monitoring the price and at a trigger price it creates and executes market orders).
Are they marketing a stop loss feature as a limit order feature? That seems beyond incompetent and verging on fraud.

[Anonymous No.30423724]

>>30423391
What the fuck are you saying?
You're correct that the platform and swap fees are taken out of the transaction, making it an offer to sell ~0.02 ETH for 1 RBC. Direct quote from the CEO of rubic.
"It is possible to create a deal a trade with unfavourable conditions - for example 1 RBC <> 1 ETH and fulfill the first part (ETH) and it will be completed automatically now"
The trade I was offering was extremely unfavourable to me, you could buy 1 rubic with 0.00002 ETH, let alone 0.02. It could have filled my order but didn't according to the CEO it should have filled my order but didn't, there have been MANY orders that have been unfavourable since release and not ONE of them has been filled.

[Anonymous No.30423891]

>>30423373
You sound like a larp, just try the limit order for yourself if you are >$1M

[Anonymous No.30423898]

>>30423486
I’m not a god I’m an average anon. Which makes all of this a much bigger problem for you, because regular anons like me see straight through your bullshit and not even little ol’ me can be intimidated by your aggressive attitude and insults. Frankly, you suck balls at this and I hope your boss pops in to see why your campaign is crashing and burning and see you in the middle of it all, flailing madly and screaming at anons pointing out you’re full of shit.

[Anonymous No.30423989]

>>30422360
my man there's a difference between a test transaction by the devs in a perfect environment prior to release vs a tx from a regular user

[Anonymous No.30423992]

>>30419834
I will post a webm with limit order as soon as the gas fees drop. Visual proof is probably needed on an imageboard anyways.

[Anonymous No.30423996]

>>30423391
This makes complete sense and anyone who disagrees with it doesn't understand what is going on.

[Anonymous No.30424022]

>>30423724
Tell me how it should fill the order if you don't have the funds for the swap fee (gas)?
How much ETH did you put in? Because when you sent 0.18 the order CANNOT execute.

[Anonymous No.30424026]

>>30423898
i trade crypto because it's fun and keeps me involved in new tech. I don't need the cash. I don't have a boss. I'm a fucking senior counsel patent attorney. I can shit on my desk and then take 3 weeks off and no one would ask why it smells or why im gone. Lulz

[Anonymous No.30424372]

>>30423891
No. I was interested in rubic, spent time researching it, now I only feel distaste and will not invest more time or energy in this scam. I am frankly a bit disappointed since I had some hopes for this project.
> you can afford testing it
So can their fucking PR department. If their response to this enormous fiasco that will end them is not to demonstrate beyond doubt that the feature works but rather to send an army of impolite shills to scream at anons who question it, it must be concluded that the feature doesn’t work and the whole thing is a scam. Bye, shill, or rather see you next time a scam project needs a low IQ insult monkey to throw at doubting Toms.

[Anonymous No.30424511]

>>30424022
?? The gas fees and transaction fee are taken out of the trade. The 0.18 - 0.15 fee - 0.01 gas is 0.02 ETH for 1 rubic, that trade could be filled at ANY point.

[Anonymous No.30424915]

>>30424511
Dude, when did you last saw gas being 0.01 ETH for a swap?
Lowest swap gas fees are around 0.03-0.04 ETH today.

[Anonymous No.30425017]

>>30424511
And there's your problem.
0.01 gas doesn't fucking exist anymore.
0.03 if you are lucky, usually 0.05 or more

[Anonymous No.30425147]

>>30425017
>>30424915
So if I understand this right, the reason that the autistic anon's swap didn't work is because he's genuinely a retard and underpaid for gas? Wow.

[Anonymous No.30425191]

>>30425147
Yes, ETH network got the best of him

[Anonymous No.30425218]

>>30421200
best argument against poobic is honestly to open the chart
its a PnD and its not going to recover

[Anonymous No.30425242]

>>30425191
Thanks for explaining fren, I'll be honest, I fell for the fud a bit too. I appreciate people like you actually explaining where the fuck up was, because it's not necessarily very obvious.

[Anonymous No.30425309]

>>30425242
dont believe random faggot anons when the ltieral CEO of rubic said something different on the telegram
DYOR for once and stop listening to fucking people on 4chan

[Anonymous No.30425397]

>>30425309
I saw what he said, but their excuse about how "only the test case worked!!1" was mildly convincing. Thanks fren, also, you may wanna delete this, since it conflicts with your previous comment fudding rubic kek

[Anonymous No.30425481]

>>30425309
I literally said the same thing as the CEO.
Fees are taken from the ETH/RBC YOU provide for the swap.
If you don't pay for the gas, you aren't getting an automated swap. Easy as that!

[Anonymous No.30425911]

STAYS. FUCKING. CUBIC

[Anonymous No.30425940]

>>30425242
One rule I learned in this place is if you aren't doing the fucking, you are the one getting fucked. The anon posting about the limit orders not working, claimed he is doing it out of the goodness of his heart. Apparently, he is just trying to protect his fellow /biz/raelis from le ebil scammers. Draw a box with four sections. Put Rubic, You, biz and the FUDer. Brainstorm who would gain the most by spreading rumours that limit orders are allegedly not working, and who would lose the most. A small thought experiment. And make your decision (whether to sell or hold) based on those odds.

[Anonymous No.30426032]

>>30425940
I already made that assumption, that he obviously had a motive, but I didn't fully understand how to debunk his fud which left it open to interpretation, that's why I asked. Other fud I've seen is easily debunked/rectified, but this one seemed more stubborn than usual, so even though it was obvious the anon was acting in bad faith, I was still left wondering. I never planned to sell but I was curious about what the actual answer was.

[Anonymous No.30426753]

>>30425940
Then do the same exercise but swapping the “FUDer” for people telling you it’s “just fud”. What results do you get this time?

[Anonymous No.30427015]

>>30426753
You mean /biz/? Already accounted for fren. Vlad has something to lose in all of this, by risking his reputation. I'll stick with him. Thanks for the concern though. Appreciate it.

[Anonymous No.30428157]

>>30419834
Rubic

[Anonymous No.30429046]

>>30419834
Rubic

[Anonymous No.30429982]

>>30419834
Rubic

[Anonymous No.30430085]

>>30419834
Rubic.

[Anonymous No.30430114]

>>30427837

[Anonymous No.30430618]

>>30426753

shut up

die

go away loser

[Anonymous No.30431099]

>>30419834
Rubic

[Anonymous No.30431889]

>>30419834
Rubic

[Anonymous No.30432405]

my jewbic stays pubic

[Anonymous No.30433465]

>>30419834
rubic
cubic

[Anonymous No.30433643]

crazy fucking day in rubic land.
what are the implications of such incessant threads about rubic unlike anything i've ever seen?
big news on the way or what?