Red pill me on Bonded Finance (BOND)

[Anonymous No.30374459]

Adderall anon mentioned it in his schizo thread and included it in his schizo pastebin... really solid white paper... clearly defined platform, use case, and unique value proposition... lots of connections...yet only $10 mil market cap. What am I missing here, anons? Is this vaporware or is it unironically an overlooked gem?

[Anonymous No.30374560]

Could just be early for once.

Wait...that's probably not it.

[Anonymous No.30374705]

>>30374459
Bond whales are in a private TG chat with the CEO. You will get dumped on.

[Anonymous No.30374766]

Bonded has been shilled here since before December when the first audit was announced. Most of Biz is at least familiar with it by now but most have dismissed it as vaporware or panjeet scam. Others ignore it because it crabs while they chase scam coins. The amount of SEETHE caused by missing out on RBC will be nothing compared to this one

[Anonymous No.30374871]

>>30374459
Extremely undervalued for what they seek to provide but pull out after the first few pumps. The other DeFi projects listed have institutional funding and are safer to hold long term.

Don’t have the pastebin saved but don’t remember him mentioning a timeframe for holding. Been doing a lot of research into the “cream finance“ he mentioned and it seems like it has the same team as Yearn which is a 30k+ coin

[Anonymous No.30374912]

>>30374459
Man I bought $60,000+ of this because my magic 8 ball told me to.

Pro’s
>is being thoroughly audited by same company to audit Cisco, Elrond, and some Ukrainian Bank
>has lot’s of partnerships
>Will use LINK oracles
>has a good pajeet dev from Matic

Con’s
>everything else
>missed December deadline for audit completion
>failed audit 1 due to garbage code
>website looks atrocious / unfinished
>no timelines at all
>founders keep saying “soon” whenever asked anything

Now, my Magic 8 ball also told me that 1 bond would be $1 before the end of 2021, so I will continue holding.

[Anonymous No.30375199]

>>30374912
Are you the anon who first mentioned it? Adderall anon said “to look into” and stressed doing our own research but the audit is a little concerning.

Might ape in once the audit is done though.. IMO Curve, Synthetix, and Stacks were the major winners he shilled though.
>Synthetix was incubated by Paradigm which was founded by a coinbase founder
>Curve provides liquidity to Synthetix
>Stacks is a Bitcoin DApp chain that will allow applications to be built on the bitcoin network
>stacks is also sub $2 and has Winklevoss funding which means it’s a guaranteed thing
Just my .02 anons

[Anonymous No.30375483]

>>30375199
Did you check out Opium, which he also mentioned? Reading the white paper and it looks very interesting, especially since they have a working product. You can buy insurance on USDT collapsing right now, for example.

[Anonymous No.30375677]

>>30375199
I was in that thread. I jokingly said Bond was the real hidden gem. I had fomoed in 4 days before that thread.

But yeah, he was definitely talking about looking at “startup accelerators” ran by the bigboys like Coinbase, and then just copying them. So he was talking avout Synthetix last night.

[Anonymous No.30375793]

>>30374705
this...

[Anonymous No.30375935]

PROS:
>Sameep
>Mak
>Bond memes
>Partnerships

Negative:
>The rest of the team
>Auditcity
>Maybe not even that good a platform since so many have caught up
>kinda worried about 60% of the tokens not circulating yet

[Anonymous No.30376254]

>>30375677
Bought into Synthetix after reading the thread. BOND is definitely a riskier play but $200 for a small bag suicide stack isn’t a bad risk vs reward ratio. If I were to buy anything more I’d wait until it hits a real exchange because the TG issue has been mentioned here a few times (can check warosu). Not to say it won’t pump hard.. but there were so many other “sure fire” plays just seems silly to go all in on the riskiest of the bunch. Wouldnt put in serious money but that’s just me.
>>30375483
Actually been holding Opium since last month so was happy to see it mentioned. They also plan on offering insurance on options trades which is a first in the industry and it has only been mentioned on /biz/ a handful of times since launch.

One of my most bullish holdings atm but ethereum network congestion put a bit of a hold on the price action so I’ve just been cost averaging. Large institutional presence too, very comfy.
>talking about looking at startup accelerators ran by the bigboys like Coinbase, and then just copying them.
This is exactly what I got out of the thread. Thank you for putting it succinctly
>>30375793
ID: Hax Ran (Kek has spoken? Lol)

[Anonymous No.30376331]

>>30375935
This.

Riskiest play out of everything mentioned, would look around the Stacks (winklevoss), Opium (paradigm), or Synthetix discord / telegram groups before going into Bonded Finance but bought $200 worth in case.
>t. risk adverse dolphin

[Anonymous No.30376395]

>>30376254
What's with the circulating supply though? Only 5% circulating?

[Anonymous No.30376420]

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ego/
ego.finance

[Anonymous No.30376464]

what the fuck is happenning here. stop discussing this trash, im fucked up with your zero trade and fake “moon”. your rockets are shit. is that so fucking challenging to put money in smth good kek???buy phore coin, have the graphene distribution and stop being so dumb

[Anonymous No.30376588]

>>30376464
Shill Phore to me. Been around since 2017 and yet just a $10 mil market cap...

[Anonymous No.30376702]

>>30376588
I can almost guarantee you're replying to a bot. If you lurk long enough on biz you'll notice a pattern

[Anonymous No.30376773]

>>30376702

[Anonymous No.30376863]

>>30376395
Opium has an interesting token lockup schema and burning system gonna try and find exacts

List of DeFi projects for those who don’t mind digging. Website only provides a broad description but great for seeking out moonshots
>https://defipulse.com/defi-list/

[Anonymous No.30376955]

>>30376863
There sure isn't much in the way of derivatives platforms on that list...

[Anonymous No.30376965]

>>30376588
>>30376588
Check’d and that’s for sure a shill bot they switch projects every few weeks

[Anonymous No.30377034]

>>30375677
Because you said that he gave a us a breadcrumb, must mean something. Whitepaper seems pretty interesting.

[Anonymous No.30377605]

>>30374766
>>30374912
>>30377034
What’s their community like? Bitching about an audit, bullish on the project? Devs responding or going ghost? Haven’t checked yet but plan to tonight

[Anonymous No.30377911]

>>30377605
team doxx'd, bunch of partnerships announced last month too. I believe they're in the process of getting audited.

[Anonymous No.30378088]

>>30377605
Just jumped in the TG
>extensive conversation about how to dodge IRS and avoid crypto cap gains taxes

[Anonymous No.30378120]

>>30378088
and scrolling up looks pajeet and cringe af...this can't be a real project

[Anonymous No.30378207]

>>30374705
As much as I hate these conspiracy theories as a weak fud they usually are - I wouldn’t bet my shittiest of shitcoins that such a collusion doesn’t exist

[Anonymous No.30378436]

>>30378088
Lmaooo might be smart to wait until an exchange listing

[Anonymous No.30379115]

Mark Cuban is an investor. #IYKYK

[Anonymous No.30379293]

>>30378436
Nah I'm out, TG smells like curry and screams vaporware.

[Anonymous No.30379357]

>>30379293

I did a 120x on Bao and will do it again on this shit. Neck yourself.

[Anonymous No.30379370]

>>30379293
Good call. The community says everything you need to know lol

[Anonymous No.30379613]

>>30379370
I just checked out the Opium TG and its dry and boring as a Federal Reserve meeting...bullish af

[Anonymous No.30379669]

can anyone link me to this pastebin? sounds interesting

[Anonymous No.30380201]

>>30379669
You'll find it in here
>>30314929

[Anonymous No.30380355]

[Anonymous No.30380408]

>>30380355
Ya, thread's over folks. Bonded Finance is retarded and pajeet. Everyone go home, show's over.

[Anonymous No.30381059]

>>30374871
>The other DeFi projects listed have institutional funding
are you implying that bonded does not?

[Anonymous No.30381129]

>>30378436
They already have one kek

[Anonymous No.30381251]

>>30381059

I noticed the original image tweeted also had rarestone capital, which is a huge one. but why would they remove it? https://twitter.com/bondedfinance/status/1319309983784337410

[Anonymous No.30381354]

>>30381251
interesting. i had only seen the medium post, but it is somewhat concerning seeing that the twitter post has a different image

[Anonymous No.30381379]

he was talking about snx and dydx retards

[Anonymous No.30381946]

>>30381354
only things I can think of is they backed out, it was a mistake, or something with an nda...? idk

[Anonymous No.30382427]

>>30381946
the hopium in me wants to say NDA. that kind of makes sense, because you can't edit tweets.

[Anonymous No.30383155]

>>30382427
any other plausible explanation? why would that even be under nda? feel like it's normally public knowledge

[Anonymous No.30384523]

Too bad they are a diversity hire female/tranny dev team

[Anonymous No.30385048]

>>30383155
the article itself also does not list rarestone but only the others.

[Anonymous No.30385049]

>>30374705
not a hecking dumparino

[Anonymous No.30385653]

>>30379669
>>30380201
The link in the pastebin has expired. Would any kind anon reupload a timed link? If not, oh well, he gave good crumbs.

[Anonymous No.30385722]

>>30385653
HE ACTUALLY DELETED IT, Adderall anon wasn't even larping

[Anonymous No.30387388]

>>30385653
>>30385722
Looking for this?

[Anonymous No.30388698]

>>30387388
Thank you for the large crumb anon

[Anonymous No.30389203]

>>30374459
you're not missing anything. it's allr ight there.
the audit will come back clean. mcap is so low because the platform hasn't launched yet. the fact that everyone wants to work with them is proof positive that's it's based though.
get in while you still can