/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.30179059]

Elon Musk playing around with NANO confirmed!

[Anonymous No.30179135]

>>30179059
1 second transaction time plus 0 fees.
NANO is better than the current top 10 coins combined.

[Anonymous No.30179186]

>>30179135
inb4 the NanoFUDDER

[Anonymous No.30179333]

>>30179059
WTF IS THIS. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE

[Anonymous No.30179501]

>>30179059
I've done that with nano before. With poorfag amounts though, holy shit

[Anonymous No.30179536]

>>30179059
>Elon Musk
Smh anon

[Anonymous No.30180243]

>>30179059
somebody upload the nano thread on it being a scam thx

[Anonymous No.30180353]

>>30180243
>I can't buy in til next week
>Quick, upload some FUD

[Anonymous No.30180990]

>>30179059
Nano is a scam and you know it.
>>/biz/thread/S28856161

Pic. Nano scammers looking for new paypigs aka "investors"

[Anonymous No.30181041]

>>30179059
>Elon Musk playing around with NANO confirmed!
Yet another insane lie from the Nano scammers.

Just like your paypal lie. Pic related.

[Anonymous No.30181079]

>>30179059
Just like your Bank of America lie.

[Anonymous No.30181338]

>>30179059
Nano scammers spammed the hell out of Plebbit, Facebook, and /biz/ claiming that Mastercard endorsed Nano. Nothing could be further from the truth. It was just a low-ranking Mastercard employee (Mastercard have at least 3200 VPs and 1000 Executive VPs) that said something mildly positive about Nano. It's just as retarded as if a scammer group held shares in a beverage company called Coca Cuck and spammed that a Walmart VP was endorsing Coca Cuck, when in reality it was only the local Walmart manager that mildly said that he enjoyed a glass of Coca Cuck sometimes.

That is how shady and dishonest these Nano scammers are. No wonder, as even their devs/team have a long history of criminal activity and of lying through their teeth to existing and potential investors.

[Anonymous No.30181383]

>>30179059
>>30181338
Of course Nano scammers lied on top of lies. There is no way in hell Nano can scale and handle thousands of tps.

[Anonymous No.30181420]

>>30179059
>>30181338
Australia's local VP business Mastercard suddenly added this to his LinkedIn:

>Disclaimer: My views expressed are of my own.

[Anonymous No.30181460]

>>30179059
>>30181338
Nano Foundation was of course officially pushing the scam. Pic.

[Anonymous No.30181485]

reckt, get the dip tard or go away poor
this shillers try to scam you with trashtokens
don’t believe in this trash, wanna see the top staking gem?
take a look at Jul with dual platform on binance smart chain
>3700$ already here

[Anonymous No.30181502]

>>30179059
There are literally thousands of Nano threads with insane Nano partnership claims, pushed by the usual scammy Nano discord trannies.

[Anonymous No.30181588]

>>30179059
its centralized and the founders have SHUTDOWN the network before, they can also BAN YOU FROM SENDING if u spam their "network" too much lmao.

Its ddos open

[Anonymous No.30181627]

>>30179135
>NANO is better than the current top 10 coins combined.
Insane statement. Nano is not free, can't scale, and is wide open to spam attacks. Nano's claim in their whitepaper about unlimited scaling is absolutely rubbish. It's just as crazy as me stating that I will go the moon using my bicycle, proudly claiming that my speed is unlimited, only restricted by my muscle strength and I am getting stronger and stronger for each day, and very soon I will be strong enough to get such a high speed that I will jump to the moon. Ridiculous. Do they have any written plan for 100 000 TPS? Any cost analysis? ETH and other competitors will roll out 100K to 1 million TPS in a matter of months/year.

Nano has done zero cost analysis for 100 000 TPS bandwidth, CPU, and IO. Random volunteers are supposed to take costs involving millions of USD each year, working on the network 24/ with no downtime, holidays, Christmas etc. Nano has done nothing to provide how it is feasible for Nano to reach 100 000 TPS within the next years. However, imagining it's possible, Nanoids admits that Amazon and large operators like them will take all the costs and burdens of operating the system. That's a clear and open single point of failure (SPOF) and is the very reason why people choose crypto currencies over banks and centralized payment systems. That Nano is not able to identify a clear and basic SPOF in their system is worrisome on multiple levels.

Pic Nano hodler getting assraped since January 2018 by the Nano Devs, Italian scammers, and the market, buying some more, while screaming:
"2 da moooOooooooOooon!!!"

[Anonymous No.30181732]

>>30181627
dev here, can confirm that nano is an italian job

[Anonymous No.30181797]

>>30179059
Of course, Nano is now lying about "Elon Musk playing around with NANO confirmed!"

Only reason why anyone has heard about Nano is that they lied about Nano having 7000 tps (reality was 1% of promised tps) when BTC network was clogged in late 2017. Worse Nano has the absurd business model that they can get suckers to run the network for free, zero compensation whatsoever, and thus have zero fees. Works well when NOBODY is using the crashed tech network. However, if you ask how much it will cost in CPU, IO, bandwidth, hardware etc to run a global network on their plebbit page, /r/NanoCircleJerk, you will be banned within seconds. Same if you ask anything related to their crashed tech, cost analysis for a global network based on volunteers taking all the costs, swindle, corruption and scam. Nano provides zero real-world transparency.

[Anonymous No.30181825]

>>30179059
>>30181797
The sad reality behind the vile 7000 tps claim from Nano scammer devs, Jewish grifters and Italian swindlers, was 75 tps. Even today, two years later, Nano scammers can't even muster 10% of what they claimed in 2017.

[Anonymous No.30181863]

>>30179059
>>30181797
>>30181825
It was well known in the community that Nano devs and team were lying through their teeth. Vitalik even tweeted about it

[Anonymous No.30182149]

>>30179135
>NANO is better than the current top 10 coins combined.
Ryte...
-Nano is centralized vaporware.
-Nano foundation shuts down nodes they don't like through a backdoor and/or exploit. Pic.

[Anonymous No.30182298]

>>30179059

Musk please check out mochimo dao and link

[Anonymous No.30182493]

>>30182298
Musk there's this new defi toy where you can borrow with negative interest rates and the loan pays itself off because of yield farming. It will teach you the wonderful ways of DeFi. 20% yielding profits a week

check out Alchemix, the devs are linked to andre cronje

[Anonymous No.30182532]

>>30179135
>NANO is better than the current top 10 coins combined.
Ryte...
->It takes only a mild 200-300 tps spam to crash the Nano network. After that, Nano Foundation must send around zip files to node operators to "update" the transaction history.

[Anonymous No.30182847]

>>30179059
You fucks are really getting desperate to shill the coin you refuse to sell huh?
Admit you failed buying at the peak of 2018, you'll never get that money back.

[Anonymous No.30182906]

>>30179135
>NANO is better than the current top 10 coins combined.
Ryte...
-All Nano scammers have is criminal and lying devs, plus a horrific shitcoin of a tech trainwreck Nano is wide open for spam attacks, due to your feeless transactions, i.e. volunteers taking all the costs for no reason. No wonder Nano's hysterical core dev Colin is threatening to sue anyone who stress test or spam test Nano. Pic.

[Anonymous No.30182912]

>>30181338
This. Reminder to discard any coin that's been out for longer than 2 years and hasn't gone anywhere.

[Anonymous No.30183004]

>>30179059
Wow OP you got absolutely rekt.
Now fuck off

[Anonymous No.30183080]

I'm holding some Nano because of the potential for a 10-15x from here. I don't give a shit about what partnerships the Nano team does or doesn't have. If the coin is actually fast, feeless, and secure at a high number of TPS then it will see adoption. Marketing and partnerships won't be necessary, adoption will happen naturally.

If the technical limitations that others are mentioning in this thread are true, then we are going to see some huge problems as the number of users grows. I would want to see how things play out. If it's a complete disaster and my investment goes to zero that's fine. That would be much better than having Nano fade into obscurity without ever getting tested on a large scale.

[Anonymous No.30183310]

>>30179135
>NANO is better than the current top 10 coins combined.
Ryte...
It takes virtually nothing to cripple Nano vaporware and make it unusable. Pic related. There is no way in hell Nano will be a global currency ever.

[Anonymous No.30183413]

>>30181383
If you're gonna pretend to reply to yourself at least change your IP first m8.

[Anonymous No.30183445]

>>30183080
Why would you hold for a potential 10-15x of something that is doomed due to tech wreck and incompetent/dishonest team, pic related, when there are so many 100x and 1 000x projectes out there?

[Anonymous No.30183574]

>>30183445
I mean I'm holding some for same reason as this guy >>30183080
World needs a fast, feeless coin. Transaction costs are cripping ETH, BTC and others, and BTC has big time delays.

I'm curious why you're relentlessly shilling against this thing, and lying by pretending to reply to your own posts.

[Anonymous No.30183885]

>>30183574
>and lying by pretending to reply to your own posts.
YOU are lying, psycho. I don't respond to my own posts.
>feeless coin
-That means wide open to spam attack
-Feeless is false, all costs and work are taken by volunteers. That is an insane business model and only functions when there is no load on the network.

[Anonymous No.30183914]

>>30183445
Because there are some interesting technical challenges to scaling and I want to see how it plays out. I want to see who is going to be running nodes and who will foot the bill. I want to see if there's a complete network crash. Because I'm holding Nano I feel emotionally invested in the story.

Plus, Nano has a devoted following. The potential for a pump is there for sure.

[Anonymous No.30184321]

>>30183574
>I'm curious why you're relentlessly shilling against this thing
I knew about the TPS lie from Nano pre-Bitgrail and got my assets/profit out. When the scam/crash happened, I had to watch people losing all their money, some talked about suicide and some very likely did commit suicide. I tried to help as many as I could and many wanted to organize donations etc but we got zero help from Nano Foundation. They kicked all discussion about Bitgrail from their plebbit page and refused to do anything to help the victims. There are numerous ways and technical solutions they could have done to help the victims and offset their losses. They did nothing and instead jumped into an orgy of hedonism, woke hard left hypocrisy and pushing hard for feminism/BLM/womenintech/globohomo etc. I am so disgusted. After that, the Bitgrail victims got scammed again by Nano Foundations dirty deal with Espen Enger, only to have Bitgrail victims scammed a third time when Espen Enger exit scammed with their donations.

To have these dirty Nano lefties running around lecturing other people about decency and morality is just disgusting. Pic.

[Anonymous No.30184763]

>>30179059
>>30179135
>NANO is better than the current top 10 coins combined.
Even former Nano core dev Zack Shapiro has no faith in this shitcoin. He explains in pic why Nano is unable to compete with BTC and will fail. Nano is a scam.

[Anonymous No.30185160]

>>30179059
Another insane rumour pushed by the Nano scammers (that caused another usual Nano pump and dump), was when Nano hired a low level Amazon UK employee and this was sold as an imminent Nano-Amazon partnership. Sadly people following Nano knew that it was just another one of Nano's now many #WomenInTech diversity hires.

Deepa Mardolkar
>Incompetenet
>Diversity hire
>Pajeet
>Her linkedIn looks like a feminist blog, pic
When you thought Nano couldn't get any worse, they drop this on you..

[Anonymous No.30185295]

Why do you give this much of a fuck?
>>30184321
>raising money for "victims" to help offset their losses
This has to be a troll. From the way you type you sound deranged.

[Anonymous No.30185505]

>>30185160
let's pick up where we left off
>>30114272
>>30114418
>>30114650
>>30115049
your turn

[Anonymous No.30185690]

>>30183413
>If you're gonna pretend to reply to yourself at least change your IP first m8.
You are so fucked up and stupid that you don't understand that I am adding additional relevant information to my previous post. Fuck off newfag. Go and scam your Nano shitcoin somewhere else.

>>30185295
>This has to be a troll. From the way you type you sound deranged.
As always the moronic Nano scammers are totally unable to defend their scam and crashed tech trainwreck. All you idiots have is mass-flagging comments. Pathetic, weak and stupid Nano scammers. Pic related

[Anonymous No.30185966]

>>30185690
>>30185690
fine, let's do it the old fashioned way then:
you know exactly what you're doing, it's called gish gallop
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop
so no, I don't intend to engage in rational debate with someone who is arguing in bad faith (and coincidentally lost a shitton on bitgrail lmao). if the network is so shitty and it takes nothing to cripple it, DO IT FAGGOT, short it and bust it right now and prove yourself right.
>inb4 your bullshit "altruism" copout
you're pathetic

[Anonymous No.30186217]

>>30185966
>arguing in bad faith (and coincidentally lost a shitton on bitgrail lmao).
Of course the Nano moron whining about bad faith is lying again. Here: >>30184321

>you know exactly what you're doing, it's called gish gallop
Try to debunk one of my points, Nano scammer. Do it.

>if the network is so shitty and it takes nothing to cripple it, DO IT FAGGOT,
I am not a sociopath like you and your Nano devs/team. I warn people against Nano so they don't lose money, I will not be the immoral cause that they lose money.

>you're pathetic
Yes, you truly are, Nano scammer.

[Anonymous No.30186271]

>>30186217
>one post:
let me start with the first one then.
>>30182149
your claim:
>Nano foundation shuts down nodes they don't like through a backdoor and/or exploit
the node in question was shut down through an open RPC port and literally anyone, including you and me, could have taken it down because it was inappropriately configured. therefore this is not a backdoor, just the spammer failed to configure his own node. your claim that this was done by someone from NF is speculation at best, therefore consistent with your gish gallop strategy. I know this might be hard for you but if you apply some logic, if the spammer knew he will be shut down by NF like that, he would simply continue to do it to prove that they are indeed shutting him down after configuring his RPC port appropriately. guess why it didn't happen and the spam is continuing even as we speak, but the network is handling it perfectly.

you also didn't answer my question
>if the network is so shitty and it takes nothing to cripple it, DO IT FAGGOT, short it and bust it right now and prove yourself right.
why don't you do it? why doesn't literally anyone do it?

[Anonymous No.30186516]

>>30186271
>the node in question was shut down through an open RPC port
How do YOU know it? Documentation. That Nano Foundation is actively shutting down nodes they don't like and/or are afraid of, only further proves what kind of tech trainwreck and vaporware Nano truly is.

>your claim that this was done by someone from NF is speculation at best
Are you on drugs? Jayycox said it was him.

>the spam is continuing even as we speak, but the network is handling it perfectly.
There is no spam. Only some extremely low traffic 20tps traffic, probably made by Nano Foundation or other Nano scammers to "prove" that Nano can tackle "spam". You are pushing that absurd lie on both plebbit and twitter, obviously unaware that you look like tech-illiterate morons.

>you also didn't answer my question
I did, Nano scammer:
"I am not a sociopath like you and your Nano devs/team. I warn people against Nano so they don't lose money, I will not be the immoral cause that they lose money." >>30186217

[Anonymous No.30186699]

>>30186516
I know it because I did it

so you are saying Jaycoxx used a backdoor/vulnerability to do it? it was done through open RPC port, anyone could have done it brainlet

>There is no spam. Only some extremely low traffic 20tps traffic
so you admit there is no spam, why would anyone need to shutdown a spammer in this case?

>I am not a sociopath like you
so basically there are 2 possibilities:
>everyone on the planet is an altruistic god such as yourself and therefore doesn't want to make money off Nano failing
>it can't be done
which one do you think is it you thick fuck

[Anonymous No.30186915]

>>30186699
>I know it because I did it
>so you are saying Jaycoxx used a backdoor/vulnerability to do it?
It's jayycox, you idiot. He said he did it.

>so you admit there is no spam, why would anyone need to shutdown a spammer in this case?
Two different events.

>so basically there are 2 possibilities:
For a long time, there were no computer viruses. Many warned that it would be a problem, but idiots like you said that it would never happen because it had not happened. Your psudo-logic is that of an imbecile. Back to discord, Nano tranny. You have to go back.


Nano supports tranny rights

#walnutsauce #TrannyRights #BLM #WokeNano #LoveIsLove #RoughAnalSexYAY

[Anonymous No.30187374]

>>30179059
>Elon Musk playing around with NANO confirmed!
As always with the lying Nano scammers, pushing their crashed vaporware: This isn't new, this person has been transferring large amounts between the same two addresses for months already.

Nano devs/team and community are by far the most nasty and dishonest in the whole crypto community. No wonder, since so many of them came from OneCoin, pic related.

[Anonymous No.30187405]

>>30186915
you didn't answer the question. did he use a backdoor/vulnerability? no, he didn't

2 different events with approx. the same number of txs makes it comparable

last argument, so basically you admit it may happen in the future (and can't happen now), thanks for confirming my argument brainlet

[Anonymous No.30187443]

>>30179135
>NANO is better than the current top 10 coins combined.
Ask me how I know you're new and never read a white paper in your life
Midwits annoy me more than full blownout retards at this point

[Anonymous No.30187533]

>>30187374
also ridiculous that you accuse others of arguing in bad faith when you are literally using bad faith arguments - "you can't prove something wont happen in the future". you made the claim, you provide the evidence. so far reality is proving your claim wrong.
you can apply your flimsy argument to absolutely anything:
>Oh so you say bitcoin can't be hacked? For a long time, there were no computer viruses. Many warned that it would be a problem, but idiots like you said that it would never happen because it had not happened. Your psudo-logic is that of an imbecile.
see how retarded you sound?

[Anonymous No.30187617]

>>30181797
Raiblocks was such a better name and logo

[Anonymous No.30187669]

>>30187405
>no, he didn't
Moron. I asked you how do you know. You said because YOU did it.
>so basically you admit it may happen in the future (and can't happen now)
To claim that I "admitted" that your shit tech wreck can't be spammed now is insane.

Nano stands with Saiful Islam against white racism in the West.

#BLM #NoWhiteAmerica #Diversity #Solidarity #OpenBordersNOW #Antifa #POCAmerica #POCEurope #NANO #SmashAfash #JIHAD

[Anonymous No.30187841]

WOWZERS THE MUSK MAN HIMSELF?

[Anonymous No.30187919]

>>30187817
Spam has crippled Nano's chad network 0 times, it has been an ongoing problem literally never. Widely admitted by schizos on 4chan talking to themselves, replying to their own posts. Just fuck off dishonest Nano fudder. Back to the loony bin, schizo.

[Anonymous No.30187928]

>>30187841
No, Nano scammers are as always lying through their teeth. One of their major desperate bagholders are sending his stuff around so the rest of the Nano scammer team can run around screaming it's Elon Musk. This is how these nasty low IQ Nano scammers are operating.

[Anonymous No.30187957]

>>30187533
Spam has crippled Nano's shit network multiple times, it has been an ongoing problem for years. Widely admitted by Nano bagholders talking among themselves, pic. Just fuck off dishonest Nano scammer. Back to plebbit, boomer.

[Anonymous No.30187971]

>>30187957
Spam has crippled Nano's chad network 0 times, it has been an ongoing problem literally never. Widely admitted by schizos on 4chan talking to themselves, replying to their own posts. Just fuck off dishonest Nano fudder. Back to the loony bin, schizo.

[Anonymous No.30188030]

>>30187971
Any idiot can go to Nano discord and see what kind of lying moron you are. Nano scammer.

[Anonymous No.30188079]

>>30188030
>Nano network is shit and spam is a huge problem!!1
>ok then why don't short it and perma-spam it and get rich
>because muh altruism and moralism, I'm not a bad guy see
>ok why doesn't someone else do it who isn't altruistic and moral
>because For a long time, there were no computer viruses. Many warned that it would be a problem, but idiots like you said that it would never happen because it had not happened.
>muh pseudo logic
kys

[Anonymous No.30188243]

>>30188079
Just fuck off, you stupid Nano scammer. You are totally unable to defend your utter tech trainwreck of a Nano scam. No wonder your devs have been lying through their teeth from day one >>30181797

Back to plebbit, boomer.

[Anonymous No.30188289]

>>30188079
Nano has some of the worst distribution in crypto. For many, Nano Foundation dumping Nano worth 300 000 USD on Nano bagholders each month sounds insane. Well, not so much when Colin is using funds from Nano Foundation to fight private messy divorce and slander accusations in court.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.746752/gov.uscourts.cacd.746752.1.0.pdf

Has Colin completely lost it? Insane statement in a legal document:
> (In layman's terms, at present, it [Nano] is the Cadillac of cryptocurrency.)
>On 28 January 31, 2018, the periodical Medium declared that it "is objectively the best pure cryptocurrency"

After dumping like a madman, Colin claims to have only 5-6 million Nano left.
Colin is angry that confidential information were leaked from this lawsuit and confidential settlement agreement:
https://decrypt.co/6396/nano-cryptocurrency-seeks-dismissal-170-million-rescue-fork-lawsuit

From Nano Foundations/Colins lawsuit:
>They tell their customers 'if you really believe in Nano ..... go to this small exchange in Italy that we don't know anybody and we have nothing to do but we completely vouch for him and he's running a legitimate exchange', we're gonna [sic] give him the Nano, he's gonna [sic] give us money every time he sells a Nano, he's gonna [sic] take half and we're gonna take half, we're gonna [sic] get rich and then one day there's gonna [sic] be an exit scam and then you're gonna [sic] be out $150 million."
> Mr. LeMahieu and the other Nano developers face the prospect of a jail sentence in a current Federal action

[Anonymous No.30188326]

>>30188079
>>30188289
>"Uhhhhh Nano, the CEO and the head guy at Nano [guess he is talking about Zack Shapiro] who holds 90% of the Nano at like $15 it was worth $1.4 billion, I think it's down to like $4, so I think it's only worth like $400,000,000 now. Uhhh, he got divorced from his wife last year. He decided that he was ready. He deserved better because he was now rich. She took all the money. And then, the financial affidavit, she, they, argued about how much the Nano was worth and what the Nano was. But I will tell you this: he said it had value and he said that he believed it was going up and he believed it was a security cause [sic] he put it on his security side of the affidavit."

Coline whined and demanded this information not to be made public. However his claim is absurd:
>Mr. LeMahieu is a private citizen.
A CEO of a foundation that at one point in time had a multi-billion dollar market cap and hundreds of thousands of "investors" is not a "private citizen".

[Anonymous No.30188334]

>>30188243
>has no rebuttal
good to know. later schizo

[Anonymous No.30188390]

>>30188289
>>30188326
>continues with gish gallop
who would have known

[Anonymous No.30188417]

so, how does Nano make money?

[Anonymous No.30188450]

>>30188079
>ok why doesn't someone else do it who isn't altruistic and moral
Fantom was down for 7 hours and the price went up 50%. Nano community is hysterical and a death cult, pic related, so to believe that you can earn good money spamming your shit network to death is insane. Devs will just lie about some pruning, ledger blah blah update and the tech illiterate Nano zombies will just continue to buy. Despite documented lies and vaporware, idiot bagholders like you are still around, scamming for Nano.

[Anonymous No.30188515]

>>30188390
You can only debate yourself and what I "basically" said. Back to plebbit boomer. You are unable to answer even the most simple question and you have been proven to lie through your teeth, just as your lying dev and team.

[Anonymous No.30188602]

>>30188390
>continues with gish gallop
That is what you idiot call documenting multiple reasons why you Nano scammers are lying multiple times? Here is just one example:

Do you super-cucked Nano "investors" and findom plebbit perverts know this?
George owned 100% of Appia, and then Nano Foundation bought shares from Appia and the holding changed. thus, Nano Foundation (Colin) bought shares from George for £100k. https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/e10hkd/nano_foundation_and_appia/

Luckily, Nano "investors" can easily identify the whales dumping on them. And that is at least something, r-r-ryte Nano guys? Pic is Nano Foundation in Monaco. Text on Instagram: Casual breakfast overlooking abramovich's yacht

[Anonymous No.30188636]

>>30188334
here, boomer >>30188450

[Anonymous No.30188989]

>>30188450
>price of shitcoin increased by 50% when network was down for 7 hours
>this is undeniable proof that stalling a network will always make money nomber go up
the state of /biz/

btw how does it feel knowing that Firano is banging hookers with your money while your existence is reduced to desperately fudding on a mongolian scuba diving board?

[Anonymous No.30188995]

>>30179059
Nano is an utter tech trainwreck and shit show.. With only 750 tps there is no way in hell Nano can be a global currency. Visa has 65 000 tps without serving the unbanked and doing micro-transactions.
https://usa.visa.com/dam/VCOM/download/corporate/media/visanet-technology/aboutvisafactsheet.pdf

Scammer Colin has done no cost analysis for running a global network, where all costs, labour, investments are supposed to be paid for and done by volunteers for free, for all eternity, with not a second downtime ever. Pure lunacy.

>One anon said this:
Nano's network literally does not work right now. They have delayed pushing epoch upgrade blocks because they have been disabled on so many exchanges.
Literally one dude with a mid range you can bring their entire network to it's knees right now by spamming.
They introduced a bug in v21.1 and if any account deadlocks the whole node does.

It is pretty basic in their pursuit of efficiency they mashed all the threads together which means if confirmations are behind on hundereds of thousands of blocks on one account they stop confirming for all accounts.
To spam hundereds of thousands of blocks takes a 200 dollar Nvidia card and a couple hours.
Some dude just optimized the opencl driver to for Blake2b so possibly a couple minutes.

The key takeaway is they have no anti spam measures in place the nodes never shit list another node (BTC did this shit back in like 2012). So one dude with a mid range GPU can totally cripple the whole network right now.
They guy who works on brainboocks white hatted and showed them this and they are not reacting properly.
Such a shitshow the NF has run a once promising project into the ground.

Pic. Nano - A New England without Racism and Bigotry

[Anonymous No.30189066]

>>30188989
>this is undeniable proof that stalling a network will always make money nomber go up
No, as I said, there is no guarantee to make money spamming the network. I also explained why.
>the state of /biz/
Just fuck off to plebbit, boomer.

[Anonymous No.30189320]

>>30189066
you didn't explain why, you gave a cherrypicked example of a shitcoin going up
the fact remains that if you managed to spam a network to the point where it wasn't usable, the price would trend downward long-term and therefore you would make a boatload of money shorting. it IS guaranteed, despite the possibility of short term scam pumps, it WOULD trend toward 0 long term
and even in the case you weren't able to make money off the network dying, people would still attack it for the lulz, just like people ddos random shit every day
try again

[Anonymous No.30189364]

>doing it for free
imagine thinking a shitcoin with no incentive for people to run nodes will succeed

[Anonymous No.30189385]

>>30179059
>100 billionaire messing around with memecoins

You can’t be serious?

[Anonymous No.30189413]

>>30189320
Not cherry picked. Same death cult following modus operandi. So how large a portion of the initial Nano distribution did Colin and his friends have? 60%? 70%? Any question regarding hard data related to Nano's initial distribution will get you insta-banned on discord, plebbit etc. They moved millions around on Bitgrail, both before and after bankruptcy. Colin refuses to answer any questions and giving empirical data regarding distribution, and he and his friends have been dumping Nano into oblivion since Jan 2017

Colin said he would release a financial statement for Nano Foundation some months ago. Of course, he lied. At least he now is saying a big fuck you to the desperate and moronic Nano community publicly. He is using Nano Foundation's money in private lawsuits, slushing money to George Coxon - buying her crashed companies and paying corruption money to Espen Enger, so he would protect them from any lawsuit from the Bitgrail Victim group.

[Anonymous No.30189469]

>>30189413
as expected, no rebuttal, continued gish gallop
FF sends his regards

[Anonymous No.30189721]

>>30189469
>as expected, no rebuttal, continued gish gallop
Again: Not cherry picked. Same death cult following modus operandi.
I have documented why technically Nano vaporware is wide open for spam. I have documented that historically you have been crippled by spam multiple times. I have documented that Nano bagholders on their own forum admit that spam is an ongoing and perpetual problem for Nano due to structural errors, etc etc. You idiot have nothing to defend your shitcoin with. Only some hysterical rambling why no one has not spent time and money to totally cripple your shit network, as that was supposed to be some deranged and insane "evidence" that it can't be done. You sound insane. Seriously. Why is it that you Nano psychos are the worst and most nasty community in crypto? Your comments and pic related.

[Anonymous No.30189792]

>>30179059
American NANO is not even under consideration for Coinbase. Nano has zero institutional adoption or cooperation, plus they have been burning through their dev fund and will go bankrupt within the next 2-.3 months.

Great job by woke Bikini Blogger George Coxon, COO of Nano, with zero experience, connections, or tech knowledge, - a rabid hard left open borders feminist.

Her LinkedIn likes include:
>Muslim invader and Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan
>World Economic Forum
>IMF's Christine Lagarde
>BBC
>Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
>and more pure globohomo and hard left persons/organizations

#WomenInTech #BLM #OpenBordersNOW #Diversity

[Anonymous No.30189829]

>>30189792
Nothing says "open borders" and "progressive leftie" as a trip in your private jet.

[Anonymous No.30189906]

>>30189792
Pic Nano's Chief Operating Officer showing Colin, Nano findom "investors" and all the "misogynists" in the tech industry her...ahem.. "job qualifications" as a Chief Operating Officer (COO) for a 4,5 Billion USD ATH Mcap crypto project.

[Anonymous No.30190127]

>>30189792
>>30189906
Bikini blogger and Nano COO with no tech knowledge, business experience or education, contacts etc, telling EU how difficult it is for women to enter tech and have a career in a male-dominated tech industry.

#WokeNano #paypigs #WomenInTech #GenderQuotas4TopJobsNOW

[Anonymous No.30190384]

How do XRP and Nano compare tech potential?

[Anonymous No.30190407]

>>30189792
>>30189906
>>30190127
Any critizism of Nano hiring a bikini-blogger with zero relevant qualifications, and Nano's feminist/woke founder and CEO, Colin LeMahieu, goes hysterical.

[Anonymous No.30190427]

>>30190384
What about Qtum

[Anonymous No.30190502]

NANO is going to 3 digits

[Anonymous No.30190687]

>>30190502
>NANO is going to 3 digits
That's delusional

>Worst anti-white globohomos in crypto
>>/biz/thread/S24148427

>Team is insane:
>>>>/biz/thread/16596049


Here are some links:
>Nano Heading for Disaster – Dirty Deals with BitGrail
http://archive.is/GGWIG

>Nano and Bitgrail leaders scammed over $100 million from Bitgrail
http://archive.is/zAtyl

>Dangerous flaws and major problems with Nano
http://archive.is/diUnZ

>Team NANO - Sex, Fraud, Corruption and Satanists
>>/biz/thread/16596049


Pic. Desperate Nano scammer boiz keep whining that pic is not Bikini Blogger George Coxon, COO of Nano, with zero experience, connections, or tech knowledge, is a rabid hard left open borders feminist.

It is. Pic is directly from her instagram account that got shut down for months. Scrubbed and re-emerged. Every one of her followers from that time can confirm that the pic was on her instagram. Photo is taken by London based photographer Sarah Bahbah using London based George Coxon as her model. George later posted the photo on her instagram.
https://archive.vn/SpKB5

[Anonymous No.30190948]

in 2017 i retired because of iota pump. Iota was shilled against hard on /biz/ because of muh refugee coin. i see a lot of similarities with Nano here.

[Anonymous No.30191141]

>>30190948
>i see a lot of similarities with Nano here.
ID the similarities then.

[Anonymous No.30191293]

>>30191141
>iota was shilled against hard on /biz
>you

[Anonymous No.30191355]

Oh god the FUD spammer is back

[Anonymous No.30191519]

>>30190948
>>30191293
Yeah, A LOT of similarities there, desperate Nano bagholder.

>>30191355
What is it with Nano bagholders and your utter inability of defending your Nano tech wreck and scammer team?

[Anonymous No.30191527]

>>30191355
checked
Just know, he convinced this anon to load up. we are not all retards here.

[Anonymous No.30191620]

>>30191527
Sure. Pic related. You are just as convincing as the other "retired iota bagholder". Lies and deceit is all that you Nano scammers have.

[Anonymous No.30191810]

>>30181041
>>30181383
>lie
calm down son it's just a joke

[Anonymous No.30191870]

>>30191620
always do the opposite of /biz/

[Anonymous No.30191909]

>>30191810
No it's a consistent pattern from desperate Nano bagholders to lie about glorious partnerships to newfags.

[Anonymous No.30191951]

>>30191870
>always do the opposite of /biz/

[Alec Monopoly No.30191982]

>>30190687
"I'll be glad to invite a more users to this group! Share the most perspective financial projects for your side. Need this data for our media TOP Ranking.
I'll appreciate any help.. and I always open for dm if group rules prohibit discussion of similar topics"

[Anonymous No.30191993]

>>30191951
>NANO scammers

[Anonymous No.30192092]

Nano stands with BLM against white nationalist bigots

Pic. With a supportive comment from Nano's black diversity hire, Naome Jone

[Anonymous No.30192134]

>>30192092
Nano diversity hire Naome Jones.

[Anonymous No.30192267]

Nano Foundation is bankrupt within a few months, burning through its funds like a drunken sailor. Pic is a silent comment to the grave situation for Nano from their hard-left feminist, BLM supporter, and Nano COO, George Coxon.

#WomenInTech #BLM #NanoFoundation #UhaveNoRight2transparency #BigTech #ProgressivesUnite

[Anonymous No.30192693]

>>30179059
Hello there, I am Nano dev, Zack Shapiro. Hope you Nano fans enjoyed me dumping my million heavy bags on your heads, while Nano was crashing, the very bags I got out from Bitgrail while you were stuck and tried to get your "KYC" from Bomber (lol). We were on the phones the whole day with bomber to get those 1.5 million Nano out, right before the "hack" and BitGrail was officially insolvent.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/7xqxqu/500_thousand_nano_was_moved_today_out_of_one_of/duaj73z/

In addition, I had to tweet like crazy to the small people, the ungrateful Nano "investors" that were pestering us all the time with their, *whiny voice* "I have 8.3 Nano and I am so worried Zack, please help me". The worst part of living in America is dealing with white people. They will never be winners. He, he, he, he...Take that as a lesson schmucks, don't listen to guys on the internet, like me, when doing financial decisions. Pic is me before you gave me my millions of $$. Aaaah, life is gooOOooOod. L'chaim!

[Anonymous No.30193363]

Powerful. Beautiful. Nano stands with the future of multicultural, multiracial Europe free from racism and bigotry,

[Anonymous No.30194040]

>The Tragic Story of Espen Enger

Nano Foundation and Espen Enger have a very shady and dark history before Espen Enger decided to exit scam with the Bitgrail Victim's money:

>Nano's core dev Shapiro, despite knowing about Bitgrail's problems did multiple times publicly endorse Bitgrail and encouraged people to invest and convinced them to stay in, to not sell their Bitgrail.
>Tens of thousands of people who would have got out ended up losing everything because of this.
>There were people who committed suicide as a consequence of this
>While key Nano dev Shapiro was telling concerned investors not to worry (as normal investors had their accounts and ability to withdraw frozen) the Nano devs and their friends were withdrawing and funneling out tens of millions of dollars, both before and after the "hack" was publicly known
>These are the people Espen Enger sold out to and banned Bitgrail victims from criticising.

Espen Enger
>Enger promised 100% transparency and to fight for the interests of the Bitgrail victims
>Very soon he had a meeting with Nano foundations lawyer - the outcome and contents of the meeting remain a secret to date.
>Soon after the meeting with Nano Foundation, he got non Bitgrail mods to monitor discord and ban/silence any actual Bitgrail victims who were critical of the Nano devs and the Nano team’s involvement
>Espen Enger said that he just "knew" that the Bitgrail victims had no legal case against Nano Foundation, so he decided to protect the Nano Foundation
>Nano foundation still won’t answer questions regarding (a) what the meeting with Espen Enger was about (b) how much money they paid him and (c) what happened to the money

>It is now clear that Espen Enger had a dirty deal to protect Nano Foundation, exit scammed, lost 100 BTC due to bad trades, and then committed suicide
Espen Børke Enger site:https://jolstad.vareminnesider.no/

[Anonymous No.30195172]

Nano is a scam

[Anonymous No.30196141]

At least Nano hodlers (16% of ATH) paid for some social impact 4 women, and that's at least something...r..r..r.ight guys??